Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads (CSEN) 2016 Educational Field Program CENTRAL MONGOLIAN NOMADS PROJECT Deer stone and slab burial complex, Khentii Province Table of Contents Essential Information…………………………………………………………...2 Program Overview……………………………………………………............2-3 Contact Us………………………………………………………………………3 About CSEN………………………………………………………………….....3 Program……………………………………………………………………...4-22 Senior Staff……………………………………………………………...4 Description……………………………………………………………4-6 Map…………………………………………………………………...…6 Student Requirements……………………………………………...…...7 Schedule…………………………………………………………......8-13 Logistics……………………………………………………………..……..….14 Transportation…………………………………………………...…….14 Visas…………………………………………………………...………14 Ulaanbaatar………………………………………………………...………14-17 In The Field…………………………………………………………...……17-24 Rural Mongolia………………………………………………...………17 Sleeping………………………………………………………...……...18 Climate………………………………………………………......…18-19 Eating & Drinking…………………………………………….....…19-21 Facilities………………………………………………………........21-23 Cultural Differences……………………………………………….23-24 List of Required and Recommended Items……………………………......25-27 Project Bibliography……………………………………………………....28-29 Cancellation Policy…………………………………………………………....29 Application Form…………………………………………………….……30-35 Waiver (Release/Assumption of Risk form)……………………………….....36 Code of Conduct……………………………………………………...…....37-40 1 Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook ESSENTIAL INFORMATION st th Program dates: June 21 to July 7 , 2016 Length: 17 days st Application Deadline: April 1 , 2016 st Full student contribution deadline: May 1 , 2016 Tax-deductible student contribution*: $3,265 th Enrollment: 7-12 students. Students must be at least 18 by June 20 , 2016; there is no student age-limit or required university enrollment status. Non-students (recent graduates, professionals, and retirees) are encouraged to apply. Previous experience required: None. Previous camping, wilderness, archaeological course work, or field research experience preferred but not required. PROGRAM OVERVIEW The “Central Mongolian Nomads Project” is a 17-day archaeological field school and research project conducted in Ulaanbaatar, Ar Janchivlan Valley (located in Tuv Province), and the western portion of Khentii Province. Archaeologists from the University of Chicago and the Mongolian University of Science & Technology will give lectures, lead seminars and lab practica, and provide hands-on instruction in core field methods through original research and visits to sites of archaeological significance in rural Mongolia. The field school aims to provide students of all ages and backgrounds with a rigorous, well-rounded introduction to archaeological research in Mongolia through intellectual and practical engagement with Mongolian history, prehistory, and culture. Our team of students and staff will live, learn, and adventure together for two weeks in late June and early July through the steppe, river valleys, and forested zone of Central Mongolia after three intense days of classroom learning in Ulaanbaatar. Archaeologists always conduct their field research within a specific cultural context; thus, our team will engage with individuals, communities, and institutions that have a stake in Mongolia’s cultural heritage. Our students of all ages and backgrounds will practice their new language skills with Mongolian staff, visit with a nomadic family, and attend a local naadam festival as part of their education on Mongolia. *The participant contribution covers the following: -Airport pickup on June 20th and drop-off on July 8th at Chinggis Khan International Airport or the main railway station in Ulaanbaatar -Shared rooms in a guesthouse with other archaeological field school students in Ulaanbaatar on the nights of June 20th, 21st, 22nd, and 23rd, and July 7th 2 Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook -Three meals per day from June 21st through July 7th (does not include: alcoholic beverages, dessert, espresso, or personal snacks. Please consult the Program Coordinator if you have any questions about what food and drink are covered in the student contribution) -Entrance fees to all national parks, protected areas, museums, monasteries, and other sites listed in the program schedule -All in-country program-related transportation costs (does not include international airfare or train travel costs) -Lectures, seminars, Mongolian language classes, and lab practica sessions at the Mongolian University of Science & Technology (MUST) in Ulaanbaatar -Mongolian-English dual translation by program staff -Program participant t-shirt Contact Us E-mail: [email protected] Mailing address: Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads c/o Jeannine Davis-Kimball, PhD 2158 Palomar Ave Ventura, CA 93001 About the Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads The Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads is a 501(c)3 non-profit educational organization founded by Dr. Jeannine Davis-Kimball in 1989. Since its foundation, CSEN has supported international collaborative research, scholarly publications, and educational field programs in Mongolia, Kazakhstan, and from the broader Eurasian steppe. More information about programming, publications, and academic ventures may be found at the organization’s website (csen.org). Rock art: archer on horseback hunting ibex 3 Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook SENIOR STAFF Program Director: Professor Lhavgasurengiin Erdenebold (PhD) Professor Erdenebold is one of Mongolia’s most esteemed archaeologists and a professor in the Department of Humanities at the Mongolian University of Science & Technology. He has been the PI or project leader on numerous archaeological research expeditions throughout the country and laboratory analyses in the Ancient Technologies Research Center at MUST. Program Coordinator: Emma Hite (MA) Ms. Hite is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Anthropology at the University of Chicago and a visiting researcher at the Mongolian University of Science & Technology. In her dissertation she studies the human-animal relationships of the Xiongnu/Khunnu Empire in Central Mongolia. She has conducted archaeological research and led field expeditions in Mongolia for over 10 years. Field Instructor: Chuluunkhuugiin Vanchigdash (MA) Mr. Vanchigdash is a lecturer in the Department of Humanities at the Mongolian University of Science & Technology. His extensive experience as a field archaeologist includes CRM and multi-season research projects throughout Mongolia, including the Egiin Gol CRM Project and the Tuul Valley Research Project. He is currently working on his dissertation, which examines the mortuary rituals and burial practices of the Khunnu/Xiongnu Empire. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The “Central Mongolian Nomads Project” is a joint endeavor of the Center for the Study of Eurasian Nomads (CSEN) and the Department of Humanities at the Mongolian University of Science & Technology (MUST). The CSEN executive director, Dr. Jeannine Davis-Kimball, first collaborated with Dr. Lhagvasurengiin Erdenebold (now professor at MUST) in 2001 on an archaeological expedition in the Mongolian Altai. 15 years later, the “Central Mongolian Nomads Project” will inaugurate its first season as an archaeological field school and provide international students of all ages and backgrounds with archaeological field experience in the Mongolian context through original research, multidisciplinary learning activities, and cultural immersion. 4 Central Mongolian Nomads Project 2016 Field School Handbook Field school instructors will give lectures and lead seminars in Ulaanbaatar and in rural Mongolia, tailoring these activities to the practical work and original research of each portion of the program. Students will learn research methods in the lab (zooarchaeology, bioarchaeology, archaeological drawing, and ceramic analysis) and field (mapping, data recording, and pedestrian survey) under the guidance of experienced American and Mongolian archaeologists. The “Central Mongolian Nomads Project” will also provide instruction on Mongolian language, history, and cultures through a combination of classroom lessons and instructor-guided site visits in two regions (Ar Janchivlan Valley in Tuv Province and the western portion of Khentii Province). Students will receive a program syllabus detailing required readings and classroom activities via e-mail after they are officially enrolled in the field school (i.e., after they have submitted all materials listed on page 30). Xiongnu burial with dromos in Central Mongolia Ar Janchivlan Valley is a locus of long-term cultural activity in Central Mongolia located near a modern shamanic center, the monumental Genghis Khan equestrian statue complex Tsonjin Boldog, and one of Mongolia’s most famous sites belonging to the Turk Empire. Ritual and mortuary sites from Bronze Age, Xiongnu, Turk, and Mongol periods dot this valley and nearby hills in Tuv Province, where local nomadic families herd animals through steppe pastureland and raptors fly overhead. Archaeologists from the Mongolian University of Science & Technology have conducted numerous field expeditions to Ar Janchivlan Valley in recent years to lay the groundwork for more targeted investigations. The research goals for the “Central Mongolian Nomads Project” in Ar Janchivlan Valley are: 1. Map the Xiongnu cemetery at Bishreltiin Am in order to understand the chronology and spatial organization of the site
Recommended publications
  • The Vocabulary of Inanimate Nature As a Part of Turkic-Mongolian Language Commonness
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 6 S2 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy November 2015 The Vocabulary of Inanimate Nature as a Part of Turkic-Mongolian Language Commonness Valentin Ivanovich Rassadin Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor, Department of the Kalmyk language and Mongolian studies Director of the Mongolian and Altaistic research Scientific centre, Kalmyk State University 358000, Republic of Kalmykia, Elista, Pushkin street, 11 Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p126 Abstract The article deals with the problem of commonness of Turkic and Mongolian languages in the area of vocabulary; a layer of vocabulary, reflecting the inanimate nature, is subject to thorough analysis. This thematic group studies the rubrics, devoted to landscape vocabulary, different soil types, water bodies, atmospheric phenomena, celestial sphere. The material, mainly from Khalkha-Mongolian and Old Written Mongolian languages is subject to the analysis; the data from Buryat and Kalmyk languages were also included, as they were presented in these languages. The Buryat material was mainly closer to the Khalkha-Mongolian one. For comparison, the material, mainly from the Old Turkic language, showing the presence of similar words, was included; it testified about the so-called Turkic-Mongolian lexical commonness. The analysis of inner forms of these revealed common lexemes in the majority of cases allowed determining their Turkic origin, proved by wide occurrence of these lexemes in Turkic languages and Turkologists' acknowledgement of their Turkic origin. The presence of great quantity of common vocabulary, which origin is determined as Turkic, testifies about repeated ancient contacts of Mongolian and Turkic languages, taking place in historical retrospective, resulting in hybridization of Mongolian vocabulary.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Acoustic Properties of Mongolian Language
    AN INTRODUCTION TO MONGOLIAN PHONETIC-LINGUISTIC MODEL: ON THE ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES OF MONGOLIAN LANGUAGE ¡ Idomuso Dawa , Shigeki Okawa and Katsuhiko Shirai ¢ Dept. of Information and Computer Science, Waseda University, Japan ¢£¢ Dept. of Network Science, Chiba Institute of Technology, Japan ABSTRACT Pandita in 1648. (c) Cyrillic scripts, created from Russian orthographic characters in 1940’s, have been widely used in This paper proposes a multi-lingual phonetic-linguistic mod- Mongolia, Kalmyk A. R. in Russia. el for Mongolian language based on the study of the In the script (a), allophones sometimes correspond to classification and the postulates of such models. This the same characters as well as the contrary case. In many model is commonly applicable for various fields as linguis- cases, a word form is quite different from the pronunciations tic/phonetic/dialectal/ language educational studies as well in these days. On the contrary, (b) Todo scripts were created as speech recognition. Its application to major dialects of based on a rule that one character corresponds to only one Mongolian has marked 91 % on word level recognition. pronunciation. Additionally, the letters have special marks In this paper, therefore, we first introduce the structure of for the long vowels etc. Todo scripts avoid the vagueness in language and classification of Mongolian dialectal speech. writing and speaking in initial Mongolian, as “Todo” means Next, we analyze and classify fundamental characteristics the clearness by Mongolian. in order to define phoneme labels. Lastly, we apply the common models to a simple word recognition experiment. ¤ (a) word ¤ (b) word written spoken written spoken 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 -- n n Mongolian language, one of the most spoken Asian lan- n n n o u u u guages, is mainly used by Mongolian people resided in g g o- o G G the Central Asia and spoken by about 7.5 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer School on Mongolian Language and Culture
    National University of Mongolia Summer School Programs 2014 National University of Mongolia Summer school programs 2014 Contents The National University of Mongolia (NUM) Overview of NUM Summer School Description of Programs: Mongolian Language and Culture Anthropology and Archaeology Mining Economy General Information Summer School 2013 Participants’ Impressions How to Apply 1. Gorkhi Terelj 2. Naadam festival 3. Gandan Monastery 4, 5. Umnugovi province, 6. Bogd Khaan’s museum 7. Central stadium(during the Naadam festival) Places to visit during summer school program NUM at glance Since the NUM was established in 1942, it has been the first and leading Institute of Higher Education in Mongolia. Schools: 16 Departments: 95 Centers & Institutes: 34 Total University Staff: 1,580 Undergraduate Students: 18039 Graduate Students: 3872 Cooperation with 114 Institutions from 28 Countries 1 National University of Mongolia Summer School Programs 2014 NUM Summer School 2014 The NUM is pleased to announce expanded program during this year’s Summer School for those interested in Mongolian Studies. Various themes are explored at an advanced academic level through a combination of practical field experience and training. Summer school on Mongolian language and culture Duration: 3 weeks Introduction Students live in a Ger, Mongolian traditional accommodation in historical and beautiful place of Ulaanbaatar’s outskirts. And from an experienced Mongolian language teacher, the students receive language training and learn about Mongolia, no prior experience necessary. Students can experience Mongolian culture first-hand: traditions, religion, and nomadic herding lifestyle, the Mongolian major summer holiday “Naadam”, horse racing, wrestling, archery, production of milk products, national songs and music.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Ethnic Groups in China
    Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page i studies on ethnic groups in china Stevan Harrell, Editor Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page ii studies on ethnic groups in china Cultural Encounters on China’s Ethnic Frontiers Edited by Stevan Harrell Guest People: Hakka Identity in China and Abroad Edited by Nicole Constable Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China Jonathan N. Lipman Lessons in Being Chinese: Minority Education and Ethnic Identity in Southwest China Mette Halskov Hansen Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928 Edward J. M. Rhoads Ways of Being Ethnic in Southwest China Stevan Harrell Governing China’s Multiethnic Frontiers Edited by Morris Rossabi On the Margins of Tibet: Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page iii ON THE MARGINS OF TIBET Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS Seattle and London Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/7/05 12:47 PM Page iv this publication was supported in part by the donald r. ellegood international publications endowment. Copyright © 2005 by the University of Washington Press Printed in United States of America Designed by Pamela Canell 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writ- ing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of Harmonious Co-Existence in the Multi-Ethnic Culture of Qinghai
    International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology International Journal of (2018) 2:1 Anthropology and Ethnology https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-018-0010-6 R E S E A R C H Open Access Harmony in diversity: an empirical study of harmonious co-existence in the multi-ethnic culture of Qinghai Dorjie Banban Received: 19 April 2018 /Accepted: 25 April 2018 / © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Abstract Finding the key to achieving harmonious co-existence among ethnic groups with different cultural traditions in a multi-ethnic state is a major problem worldwide. Qinghai is located at the intersection of the four major spheres of cultural influence of the nationalities of the Central Plains, Tibet, the Western Regions, and the Northern Grasslands, where multiple cultures co-exist, borrow from each other, seek common ground while reserving differences, thus vividly embodying the coexistence principle of “harmony in diversity.” Based on case studies on the Tibetanisation of the Han nationality, the acculturation towards Tibetan culture and Han culture, and the Islamisation of the Tibetanised Hui people in Qinghai, this paper discusses the connotation of “harmony in diversity” in the context of ethnic relations in Qinghai. The author believes that here the “diversity” indicates that every ethnic group has a stable identity related to its own ethnicity, as well as its important cultural traits, and that this identity is fully respected.
    [Show full text]
  • Postsocialist English and Nationalist Language Identities in Mongolia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by K-State Research Exchange This is the author’s final, peer-reviewed manuscript as accepted for publication. The publisher-formatted version may be available through the publisher’s web site or your institution’s library. Words, borders, herds: postsocialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia Phillip Marzluf How to cite this manuscript If you make reference to this version of the manuscript, use the following information: Marzluf, P. (2012). Words, borders, herds: Postsocialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia. Retrieved from http://krex.ksu.edu Published Version Information Citation: Marzluf, P. (2012). Words, borders, herds: Post-socialist English and nationalist language identities in Mongolia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2012(218), 195-216. Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1515/ijsl-2012-0064 Publisher’s Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2012-0064 This item was retrieved from the K-State Research Exchange (K-REx), the institutional repository of Kansas State University. K-REx is available at http://krex.ksu.edu Running Head: LANGUAGE IDENTITIES IN MONGOLIA 1 Words, Borders, Herds: Postsocialist English and Nationalist Language Identities in Mongolia LANGUAGE IDENTITIES IN MONGOLIA 2 Abstract This article focuses on the sociolinguistics of globalism (Blommaert 2010) in Mongolia by examining two dominant language identities, postsocialist English and fundamentalist nationalist Mongolian. Postsocialist English, emerging as a vital part of the free-market capitalist economy in the 1990s, is analyzed in relationship with the now receding language identity of socialist Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People's Republic of China
    The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Xin Liu, Chair Professor Vincanne Adams Professor Alexei Yurchak Professor Michael Nylan Professor Shannon Jackson Spring 2011 Abstract The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Xin Liu, Chair Under state socialism in the People’s Republic of China, dancers’ bodies became important sites for the ongoing negotiation of two paradoxes at the heart of the socialist project, both in China and globally. The first is the valorization of physical labor as a path to positive social reform and personal enlightenment. The second is a dialectical approach to epistemology, in which world-knowing is connected to world-making. In both cases, dancers in China found themselves, their bodies, and their work at the center of conflicting ideals, often in which the state upheld, through its policies and standards, what seemed to be conflicting points of view and directions of action. Since they occupy the unusual position of being cultural workers who labor with their bodies, dancers were successively the heroes and the victims in an ever unresolved national debate over the value of mental versus physical labor.
    [Show full text]
  • China - Mongols
    China - Mongols minorityrights.org/minorities/mongols/ June 19, 2015 Profile There are nearly 6 million Mongols in China, mainly concentrated in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (IMAR) on China’s northern border with Mongolia and Russia. With only a few official crossing points, the border between IMAR and Mongolia has been the site of tensions as China has sought to enforce its policies abroad, such as in December 2016 when China temporarily closed a vital border crossing following a visit by the Dalai Lama to Mongolia. The Mongolian language is part of the Mongolic language family, with the majority of speakers in China using the Chahar, Oyirad and Barghu-Buryat dialects. Mongolian written language was adopted some 800 years ago, under Genghis Khan. It is modeled on an older form of vertically written Uyghur script. Most Mongols are Tibetan or Vajrayana Buddhists, though some also maintain shamanist practices. They tend to be concentrated in the northern and central parts of the IMAR, although there are also substantial numbers in Xinjiang, Liaoning, Jilin, Heilongjiang, and Yimin provinces. State-sponsored or voluntary Han migration to the IMAR has long since made the Mongols a minority in their own land. Many Mongols still have a close connection with the traditional pastoral nomadism and culture of their ancestors, though this has been weakened in many areas of China, where this lifestyle is under threat from environmental degradation, urbanization and forced urbanization or other governmental pressures. The IMAR is rich in natural resources and open land, which has fuelled successive waves of exploitative land and resource grabs sparking episodes of resistance from ethnic Mongolians and harsh responses from the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Language Diversity Across Cultures: the English-Mongolian Case Study
    International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 6 no 3 & 4, year 2014, http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ 167 Managing Language Diversity Across Cultures: the English-Mongolian Case Study Amarsanaa Ganbold Feroz Farazi Moaz Reyad School of Information Technology DISI DISI National University of Mongolia University of Trento University of Trento Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Trento, Italy Trento, Italy [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Oyundari Nyamdavaa Fausto Giunchiglia School of Information Technology DISI National University of Mongolia University of Trento Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Trento, Italy [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Developing ontologies from scratch appears to be providing relations and attributes specific to the domain. By very expensive in terms of cost and time required and often reducing polysemy (the amount of words with same such efforts remain unfinished for decades. Ontology meaning), they can enable better semantic interoperability. localization through translation seems to be a promising Ontologies that are developed to perform NLP tasks in one approach towards addressing this issue as it enables the language can hardly be used with their full potential for greater reuse of the ontological (backbone) structure. another. Representing an existing ontology in a new However, during ontology localization, managing language language, taking into account cultural and linguistic diversity across cultures remains as a challenge that has to be diversities, is defined as ontology localization. taken into account and dealt with the right level of attention In this paper, we describe the development of the space and expertise. Furthermore, reliability of the provided ontology in Mongolian starting from its English counterpart knowledge in the localized ontology is appearing as a non- trivial issue to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration and Separation of 'Language': Language Policies Of
    Integration and Separation of ‘Language’: Language Policies of Mongolian Peoples in the USSR and Mongolia, 1920–1940 ARAI Yukiyasu Introduction To define what is a language is very difficult. There are many aspects that are relevant to this question. One approach is that a particular language is completely different from others. Another is that a language is similar to adjacent languages but still calls itself a language. There are also some cases in the world where there are debates whether a vernacular in discussion is a language or a dialect. In this paper, therefore, I would like to discuss a case of Mongolian peoples where three written ‘languages’ came into being from people who had obscure ethnic boundaries but were united in one written language. There are no studies, which deal with the language policy of all the Mongolian peoples as a whole. But for the whole of the Soviet Union in this period, we can refer to the writings of V.M. Alpatov and M.I. Isaev.1 For other groups of people like Turks, there are a lot of books and papers which deal with the language policy of that group as a whole like Winner, Smith or Şimşir and books on orthographies of Turkic peoples.2 For the creation of alphabets for minority peoples (with populations less than 50,000), a paper by O.A. Kazakevich gives a very useful list that describes which language had (and has) an alphabet, in which script and in which 1 V. M. Al pa t ov, 150 iazykov i politika: 1917–2000 (Moscow 2000); M.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE PHONOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY OF JUNGAR TUVA Talant Mawkanuli Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Central Eurasian Studies, Indiana University December 1999 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • 49173-003: Improving Access to Health Services for Disadvantaged
    Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework Document Stage: Draft Project Number: 49173-003 Loan XXXX December 2018 MON: Improving Access to Health Services For Disadvantaged Groups This indigenous peoples planning framework is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 1 December 2018) Currency unit – togrog (MNT) MNT1.00 = $0.00038 $1.00 = MNT2,612.50 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank ADF - Asian Development Fund DMF Design and Monitoring Framework EMDP Ethnic Minority Development Plan EMDF Ethnic Minority Development Framework FHC Family Health Center GOM Government of Mongolia LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement MOF Ministry of Finance MOH Ministry of Health NGO nongovernment organization PIU Project Impleme SHC ntation Unit RRP Report and Recommendation to the President SGAP Social and Gender Action Plan SHC Soum Health Center SPS Safeguard Policy Statement SPRSS Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy TOR Terms of Reference UB CHD Ulaanbaatar City Health Department GLOSSARY aimag - province ger - traditional tent soum - aimag subdistrict WEIGHTS AND MEASURES km - kilometer m - meter cm - centimeter mm - millimeter m2 - square meter m3 - cubic meter M - Mega (Million) MW - megawatt In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.
    [Show full text]