DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix to Chapter 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix to Chapter 5 Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/25842 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Boer, Rients de Title: Amorites in the Early Old Babylonian Period Issue Date: 2014-05-28 Year Babylon Sippar Kiš Damrum/Kiš’vicinity Marad Isin Larsa Kisurra Uruk Ešnunna Aššur Tutub Nêrebtum Šaduppûm Uzarlulu Šadlaš Diniktum Dēr Malgium Šimaški & Other/Remarks Sukkalmah 2004 Išbi-Erra 15 Yamṣium 1 ≈Kirikiri 2003 Išbi-Erra 16 2002 Išbi-Erra 17 Kindadu Fall or Ur at the hand of Šimaški/Elam 2001 Išbi-Erra 18 2000 Išbi-Erra 19 Idadu I 1999 Išbi-Erra 20 1998 Išbi-Erra 21 ≈Puzur-Aššur I 1997 Išbi-Erra 22 1996 Išbi-Erra 23 1995 Išbi-Erra 24 ≈Bilalama ≈Ilum- ≈Šu-Kakka ≈Tan-ruhuratir II mutabbil 1994 Išbi-Erra 25 1993 Išbi-Erra 26 1992 Išbi-Erra 27 ≈ Šalim-ahum From here on: sukkalmah dynasty 1991 Išbi-Erra 28 1990 Išbi-Erra 29 1989 Išbi-Erra 30 1988 Išbi-Erra 31 1987 Išbi-Erra 32 1986 Šu-Ilīšu 1 1985 Šu-Ilīšu 2 1984 Šu-Ilīšu 3 ≈Ilušuma 1983 Šu-Ilīšu 4 1982 Šu-Ilīšu 5 1981 Šu-Ilīšu 6 1980 Šu-Ilīšu 7 1979 Šu-Ilīšu 8 1978 Šu-Ilīšu 9 ≈Nidnūša ? ≈Nabi- 1977 Šu-Ilīšu 10 Enlil 1976 Iddin-Dagan 1 Samium 1 1975 ≈Išar-ramašu ≈Ebarat II 1974 1973 1972 Šu-Ištar 1 King: Erišum I 1971 Šukkutum 1970 Iddin-ilum 1969 Šu-Anum 1968 Inah-ilī 5 ≈Silhaha 1967 Suetaya 1966 Daya 1965 Ilī-ellitī ≈Temti-Agun I 1964 Šamaš-ṭāb 1963 Agusa 10 1962 Idnaya 1961 Quqādum 1960 Puzur-Ištar ≈Šu- 1959 Lā-qēpum Amurru ≈Pala-iššan 1958 Šu-Laban 15 1957 Šu-Bēlum 1956 Nabi-Sîn 1955 Išme-Dagan 1 Hadaya 1954 Ennam-Aššur 1953 Ikūnum 20 ≈Iram-x- 1952 ≈Uṣur-awassu Iṣmid-ilum x? 1951 Buzutaya 1950 Šu-Ištar 1949 Iddin-Aššur 1948 Puzur-Aššur 25 1947 Quqādum ≈Kuk-Kirmaš 1946 Ibni-Adad 1945 ≈Azuzum Erišum 1944 Minānum 1943 Iddin-Sîn 30 1942 Puzur-Aššur 1941 Zabāya 1 Šuli 1940 Lā-qēpum 1939 Puzur-Ištar 1938 Agua 35 ≈Nur- 1937 Šu-Sîn Matišu ≈Ili-abi? 1936 Lipit-Ištar 1 Ennam-Aššur 1935 Enna-Sîn 1934 Ennānum 1933 Buzu 40 1932 Gungunum 1 Šuli King: Ikūnum I ≈Kuk-Nahundi 1931 Gungunum 2 Iddin-Sîn 1930 Gungunum 3 Ikūnum ≈Iddinuni Year: Bašimi was destroyed ≈Imgur- 1929 Gungunum 4 ≈Ur-NinMAR.KI Dān-Wēr Sin? 1928 Gungunum 5 Šu-Anum 45 Year: Anšan was destroyed 1927 Gungunum 6 Ilī-massu ≈Alila-hadûm 1926 Gungunum 7 Šu-Hubur 1925 Ur-Ninurta 1 Gungunum 8 Idia 1924 Gungunum 9 Lā-qēpum 1923 Gungunum 10 Šu-Anum 50 1922 Gungunum 11 Uku 1921 Gungunum 12 Aššur-mālik 1920 Gungunum 13 Dan-Aššur 1919 Gungunum 14 Šu-Kubum 1918 Gungunum 15 Erišum 55 ≈Kuk-Našur I 1917 Gungunum 16 Aššur-mālik King: Sargon I Gungunum 1916 Gungunum 17 Itūr-Šamaš, Aššur-mālik ca 8 years defeated Malgium 1915 Gungunum 18 ≈Ur-Ningišzida Ibisua 1914 Gungunum 19 ≈Sumu-binasa Baziya Year: the army of Malgium was destroyed 1913 Situation unknown Situation unknown Situation unknown Situation unknown Gungunum 20 Puzur-Ištar 60 1912 Gungunum 21 Pišah-Ilī 1911 Gungunum 22 Asqudum ≈Atta-hušu 1910 Gungunum 23 Ilī-pilah Situation Situation 1909 Gungunum 24 Qulali unknown unknown 1908 Gungunum 25 ≈Ṣallum Susaya 65 1907 Gungunum 26 ≈Ubâya Amaya 1906 Gungunum 27 ≈Zikrû, Iphurum Situation unknown Situation unknown Situation unknown Situation unknown total ca. 10 1905 Abi-sarê 1 Kudānum years 1904 Abi-sarê 2 Ilī-bāni 1903 Abi-sarê 3 Šu-Kubum 70 1902 Abi-sarê 4 Quqidi ≈Ipiq-Adad I 1901 Abi-sarê 5 Abiya 1900 Abi-sarê 6 Šu-Ištar 1899 Abi-sarê 7 Baziya ≈Synchronism in AS 1898 Abi-sarê 8 ≈Mana-balti- Šu-Ištar 75 22 40 with Ur-ninurta 28 El, ca. 8 years Ipiq-Adad I, 1897 Bûr-Sîn 1 Abi-sarê 9 Abiya Abdi-Erah, Year: the army of Isin was Šiqlânum, Ašduni-yarim ruled Kiš Perhaps Ašduni-yarim ruled in Kiš’vicinity as well defeated ≈Year: Šiqlānum Mašparum and 1896 for at least eight yearsi Abi-sarê 10 died Salliya Išmeh-bala 1895 Abi-sarê 11 Ibni-Adad ≈Abdi-Erah ≈Išmeh-bala ≈Itūr- 1894 Sumu-El 1 Aham-arši šarrum 1893 Sumu-El 2 Sukkaliya 80 -Marad under Isin’s rule? 1892 Sumu-El 3 Iddin-Aššur ≈Abi-madar 1891 Sumu-El 4 Uruk defeated ≈Year: Sumu-abum Šudaya ≈Abi-madar Year: Akusum was plundered by Larsa was sent to Dēr ≈Tattanum (year Bali-epuh and Kazallu defeated ≈Ikûn-pî-Sîn? 1890 died in TIM 7 Sumu-El 5 ≈Ibni-šadûm, Larsa ruled Al-ṭāb ≈Yanqim-El ≈Yadkur-El 117:38) Year: the army of Uruk was vassal king of Uruk? defeated Larsa, married 1889 Sumu-El 6 to Sumu-El’s Aššur-damiq (year Bali-epuh 1888 Sumu-El 7 daughter Puzur-Nirah 85 died in JCS 9 74:6) 1887 Sumu-El 8 Amur-Aššur Year: Pî-nārātim was destroyed 1886 Sumu-El 9 Buzuzu ≈Ilum-ma-Ila The end of Ašduni-yarim ≈Šarriya 1885 Sumu-El 10 Šu-Hubur contemporary with at the hands of Larsa? ≈Ammi-ṣûra at (Sumu-El 11) Year: Sabum and the villages of Year: Yadkur-El Year: Yadkur-El Sippar -MAOG MD 5 dated by Būr-Sîn the bank of the Euphrates were died Year: Yadkur-El died taken f, died 1884 Abi-x x x king? Sumu-El 11 Ilšu-rabi ≈Sumun-abi-yarim ≈Sumun-abi-yarim ≈Sumun-abi-yarim? ≈Sumun-abi-yarim Year: the army of Kiš was ≈Warassa (not attested at ≈Synchronism in destroyed (Year:Warassa took Šaduppûm) IPLA 14 with -Marad under Isin’s rule? the throne) Mašparum 1883 Nāqimum king in Kiš’ vicinity, at least six own yearnames Sumu-El 12 Ali-ahum 90 1882 Sumu-El 13 (≈Year: Ṭāb-Aššur ≈Sumu- Sumun-abi-yarim, 1881 Sumu-El 14 Warassa conquered Elāli Amnānim Sumu-abum and Yawium was king:, at Išur) Halun-pî-umu least seven of his own yearnames are attested ≈Year: Tutub was restored -Halun-pî-umu already king in Marad? 1880 Sumu-la-El 1 Halun-pî-umu king in Marad Būr-Sîn g? Sumu-El 15 Iddin-abum Year: Kazallu and its king were defeated 1879 Sumu-la-El 2 Halun-pî-umu took Dilbat in Būr-Sîn 18 Sumu-El 16 Adad-bāni ≈Hammi-dušur ≈Hammi-dušur ≈Hammi-dušur ≈Hammi-dušur month V Year: Sumu-El took Nanna-isa ≈Tetep-mada -Halun-pî-umu was defeated by ≈Year: Hammi- Sumu-la-El dušur took Ṣilli- ki 1878 Sumu-la-El 3 End of Nāqimum by -Haliyum had at least six -Sumu-ditān new king in Sumu-El 17 Aššur-iddin 95 Ešnunna controlled Adad Year he defeated Halun- usurpation? own yearnames (see Marad ≈Bēlakum Tutub? ≈Treaty between pî-umu footnote) -HEO 18 207 dated to Bûr-Sîn ≈Year: Bēlakum Bēlakum and an b/Sumu-ditān 1877 Sumu-la-El 4 ≈Immerum Abdi-Erah 1 in RSM 39 Abdi-Erah 1 Sumu-El 18 made a statue of Aššur-nādā unknown ruler, -“Haliyum c”= King: Puzur-Aššur II ≈Year: Abdi-Erah Ištar Kiti perhaps Hammi-dušur Sumu-ditân h+1 died (Damrum) 1876 Sumu-la-El 5 Mananâ 1 in RA 8 5 -Abdi-Erah 2 and Ahi- Sumu-El 19 Kūbiya -Sumu-ditān’s own yearnames? Year: he built Babylon’s “Yawium” e (year he maraṣ 1 + Mananâ 1? (at least five) wall built Babylon’s wall) -Mananâ had at least 15 ≈Synchronism ≈Year: ≈Year: yearnames ≈Sumu- beteween Hammi- Bûr-Sîn 22 Hammi-dušur built Hammi-dušur built numhim dušur and Sumu- Dūr-Rimuš Dūr-Rimuš 1875 Sumu-la-El 6 “Yawium f” (year after he Mananâ 2? Lipit-Enlil 1 Sumu-El 20 Ilī-dan numhim, the king of built Babylon’s wall) Šadlaš (treaty OBTIV -Sumu-ditān’s death Year: Bêlakum died Year: Bêlakum died Year: Bêlakum died 1874 Sumu-la-El 7 Yawium h (Sumu-ditân -Mananâ and Yawium Sumu-El 21 Ṣilulu commemorated in a yearname 326). Year: Yarim-Lîm 1873 Sumu-la-El 8 died) mentioned together in Sumu-El 22 ≈Ibal-pi-El I Aššur-nādā 100 died (Mê-Turān) RSM 36 from Yawium of Kiš (RA 8 3) ≈Year: Hammi- ≈Year: Hammi- 1872 Sumu-la-El 9 (year:Sumu-atar Sumu-El 23 Ikūn-pî-Ištar dušur built the wall ≈Year: Hammi- dušur built the wall Mananâ d in BM 103198 (year: Sumu-atar died in -Sumu-atar ruled between 1871 Sumu-la-El 10 died in TIM 7 Sumu-El 24 ≈Narâm-Sîn Buzutaya of Biškira dušur built the wall of Biškira SCT38) Sumu-ditān and Sumu- 117:35, 42) numhim? of Biškira Lipit-Enlil 5 -Haliyum and Yawium 1870 Sumu-la-El 11 -Sumu-numhim comes after Erra-imitti 1 Sumu-El 25 Innaya mentioned together in Sumu-ditān, ruled at least five YOS 14 116, which is years. dated to Mananâ f+2 1869 Sumu-la-El 12 -End of Yawium Mananâ’s reign -AUCT 5 126 dated by Erra- Sumu-El 26 Šu-Sîn imitti f/Sumu-ditān ? ≈Sîn-kâšid King: Narām-Sîn I 1868 Sumu-la-El 13 MHET II/1 19 dated -EGHS 10 dated by Erra-imitti Sumu-El 27 ≈Erra-imitti d, Aššur-mālik 105 Year: he destroyed Kiš to Sumu-la-El 13 c? year he took 1867 Sumu-la-El 14 Sumu-El 28 Kisurra Aššur-imitti 1866 Sumu-la-El 15 ≈Altinû (king in the -Yamsi-El succeeds Sumu- Sumu-El 29 Enna-Sîn 1865 Sumu-la-El 16 vicinity of Sippar) numhim, ruled at least two Nûr-Adad 1 Akutum years 1864 Sumu-la-El 17 Maṣi-ilī ≈Sîn-abûšu ≈Sîn-abûšu ≈Sîn-abûšu ≈Sîn-abûšu? (not ≈Year: Sîn-abūšu attested at Uzarlulu) ≈Buntahtun-Ila Kiš under Babylon’s rule -MAOG 4 MD 6 and Testi Sîn-abûšu conquers 1863 Sumu-la-El 18 “Sumu-abum 13”→one of Mananâ’s later yearnames.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Keilschrifttexte Sargons
    DIE KEILSCHRIFTTEXTE SARGONS NACH DEN PAPIERABKLATSCHEN UND ORIGINALEN NEU HERAUSGEGEBEN VON HUGO WINCKLER. BAND I. Historisch-sachliche einleitung, umschrift und ibersetzung, wörterverzeichnis. LEIPZIG VERLAG VON EDUARD PFEIFFER 1889. MEINEM VATER JULIUS WINCKLER GEWIDMET. Inhaltsverzeichnis. Seite Vorrede .... I-V Einleitung . .. VI-XLVI Die inschriften. Die Annalen . .. 1-79 Die Annalen des saales XIV ... .. 80-95 Die prunkinschrift . 96-135 Die inschriften auf dem fuszboden der türen (Pave des portes). I. 136- 138/139 II. 138/139- 142/143 III . .... ........... 142/143-146/147 IV . ............ 146/147-157 V. .. 158- 163 Die inschrift auf der rückseite der platten . .. 164-167 Nimrüd-inschrift . 168-173 Die inschrift der stele . 174-185 Der bericht über den zug gegen Asdod nach S . .. 186-189 Kleinere inschriften . .. 190-196 Wörterverzeichnis . .. 197-234 Verzeichnis der eigennamen . .. 235-242 Verbesserungen . .. .. 243/244 Vorrede. Die meisten der inschriften Sargons sind uns durch die von P. E. Botta in den jahren 1842-45 zu Khorsabad (jL+L^;. bei Jakut 2,422) nördlich von Mossul veranstalteten ausgrabungen zugänglich geworden. veranlasser und triebfeder des unter- nehmens war Julius Mohl gewesen, der durch die wenigen da- mals in London befindlichen keilinschriftlichen denkmäler und durch die bereits erfolgte entzifferung der altpersischen in- schriften angeregt, Botta ans herz gelegt hatte, die trümmer- hügel des nach den arabischen schriftstellern als stätte Ninives bekannten Mossul zu untersuchen. die nachgrabungen daselbst, bekanntlich später von Layard glücklicher fortgesetzt, wurden indessen von keinem erfolge belohnt, bis Botta auf die aussage eines bauern hin, dass in dem etwa acht stunden weiter nörd- lich gelegenen dorfe Khorsabad beschriebene steine in menge gefunden würden, dort zu graben anfing.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Studies Level 6
    Simple Solutions© Social Studies Level 6 Level 6 Social Studies Help Pages 283 Simple Solutions© Social Studies Level 6 Help Pages Glossary the father of Judaism; a prophet of Islam; an ancestor of Jesus and Abraham Muhammad an Egyptian pharaoh; the first major leader to endorse a monotheistic Akhenaten religion Allah the Muslim term for God Alps a large mountain range in Europe the world’s second longest river; the river with the highest volume of Amazon River water Andes the world’s longest mountain range; located in South America Antarctica the southernmost continent; the world’s largest and coldest desert archaeology the study of the things left behind by past cultures (ahr kee ol uh jee) artifacts human-made objects a central Asian people who entered India and changed its culture, Aryan people bringing a caste system and Brahmanism Ashoka the Great a Mauryan (Indian) emperor who converted to Buddhism Atacama Desert the world’s driest desert; located in South America Aztec a Mesoamerican people who thrived in the 14th through 16th centuries CE Babylonian the period of time during which the Hebrews were under the control of Captivity the Babylonian Empire bar graph a graph which compares things bartering the trading of one good or service for another nonreligious common language for dating events that came before the Before Common birth of Jesus; years increase in number as the timeline goes from right Era (BCE) to left. Bhagavad Gita a sacred text of Hindu scripture the primary figure in and founder of Buddhism; born Gautama Buddha Siddhartha, a Hindu prince a major world religion founded by Buddha; beliefs include karma, Buddhism reincarnation, the Four Noble Truths, the Middle Way, and the Eightfold Path the non-human, non-cash resources used to create a good; used for the capital resources long-term production of goods; these are not used up when a good is created; includes machinery, tools, vehicles, buildings, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Iraq
    Republic of Iraq Babylon Nomination Dossier for Inscription of the Property on the World Heritage List January 2018 stnel oC fobalbaT Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 State Party .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Province ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Name of property ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Geographical coordinates to the nearest second ................................................................................................. 1 Center ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 N 32° 32’ 31.09”, E 44° 25’ 15.00” ..................................................................................................................... 1 Textural description of the boundary .................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria under which the property is nominated .................................................................................................. 4 Draft statement
    [Show full text]
  • The Sumerian King List the Sumerian King List (SKL) Dates from Around 2100 BCE—Near the Time When Abram Was in Ur
    BcResources Genesis The Sumerian King List The Sumerian King List (SKL) dates from around 2100 BCE—near the time when Abram was in Ur. Most ANE scholars (following Jacobsen) attribute the original form of the SKL to Utu-hejel, king of Uruk, and his desire to legiti- mize his reign after his defeat of the Gutians. Later versions included a reference or Long Chronology), 1646 (Middle to the Great Flood and prefaced the Chronology), or 1582 (Low or Short list of postdiluvian kings with a rela- Chronology). The following chart uses tively short list of what appear to be the Middle Chronology. extremely long-reigning antediluvian Text. The SKL text for the following kings. One explanation: transcription chart was originally in a narrative form or translation errors resulting from and consisted of a composite of several confusion of the Sumerian base-60 versions (see Black, J.A., Cunningham, and the Akkadian base-10 systems G., Fluckiger-Hawker, E, Robson, E., of numbering. Dividing each ante- and Zólyomi, G., The Electronic Text diluvian figure by 60 returns reigns Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http:// in harmony with Biblical norms (the www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/), Oxford bracketed figures in the antediluvian 1998-). The text was modified by the portion of the chart). elimination of manuscript references Final versions of the SKL extended and by the addition of alternative the list to include kings up to the reign name spellings, clarifying notes, and of Damiq-ilicu, king of Isin (c. 1816- historical dates (typically in paren- 1794 BCE). thesis or brackets). The narrative was Dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful KingS Treaty
    WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY Sources, Problems, and Approaches Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the University of Helsinki on September 22-25, 2014 Edited by G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger THE NEO-ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT 2019 STATE ARCHIVES OF ASSYRIA STUDIES Published by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki in association with the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Project Director Simo Parpola VOLUME XXX G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger (eds.) WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY SOURCES, PROBLEMS, AND APPROACHES THE NEO- ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT State Archives of Assyria Studies is a series of monographic studies relating to and supplementing the text editions published in the SAA series. Manuscripts are accepted in English, French and German. The responsibility for the contents of the volumes rests entirely with the authors. © 2019 by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki and the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research All Rights Reserved Published with the support of the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Set in Times The Assyrian Royal Seal emblem drawn by Dominique Collon from original Seventh Century B.C. impressions (BM 84672 and 84677) in the British Museum Cover: Assyrian scribes recording spoils of war. Wall painting in the palace of Til-Barsip. After A. Parrot, Nineveh and Babylon (Paris, 1961), fig. 348. Typesetting by G.B. Lanfranchi Cover typography by Teemu Lipasti and Mikko Heikkinen Printed in the USA ISBN-13 978-952-10-9503-0 (Volume 30) ISSN 1235-1032 (SAAS) ISSN 1798-7431 (PFFAR) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. vii Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi, Raija Mattila, Robert Rollinger, Introduction ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • 2210 Bc 2200 Bc 2190 Bc 2180 Bc 2170 Bc 2160 Bc 2150 Bc 2140 Bc 2130 Bc 2120 Bc 2110 Bc 2100 Bc 2090 Bc
    2210 BC 2200 BC 2190 BC 2180 BC 2170 BC 2160 BC 2150 BC 2140 BC 2130 BC 2120 BC 2110 BC 2100 BC 2090 BC Fertile Crescent Igigi (2) Ur-Nammu Shulgi 2192-2190BC Dudu (20) Shar-kali-sharri Shu-Turul (14) 3rd Kingdom of 2112-2095BC (17) 2094-2047BC (47) 2189-2169BC 2217-2193BC (24) 2168-2154BC Ur 2112-2004BC Kingdom Of Akkad 2234-2154BC ( ) (2) Nanijum, Imi, Elulu Imta (3) 2117-2115BC 2190-2189BC (1) Ibranum (1) 2180-2177BC Inimabakesh (5) Ibate (3) Kurum (1) 2127-2124BC 2113-2112BC Inkishu (6) Shulme (6) 2153-2148BC Iarlagab (15) 2121-2120BC Puzur-Sin (7) Iarlaganda ( )(7) Kingdom Of Gutium 2177-2171BC 2165-2159BC 2142-2127BC 2110-2103BC 2103-2096BC (7) 2096-2089BC 2180-2089BC Nikillagah (6) Elulumesh (5) Igeshaush (6) 2171-2165BC 2159-2153BC 2148-2142BC Iarlagash (3) Irarum (2) Hablum (2) 2124-2121BC 2115-2113BC 2112-2110BC ( ) (3) Cainan 2610-2150BC (460 years) 2120-2117BC Shelah 2480-2047BC (403 years) Eber 2450-2020BC (430 years) Peleg 2416-2177BC (209 years) Reu 2386-2147BC (207 years) Serug 2354-2124BC (200 years) Nahor 2324-2176BC (199 years) Terah 2295-2090BC (205 years) Abraham 2165-1990BC (175) Genesis (Moses) 1)Neferkare, 2)Neferkare Neby, Neferkamin Anu (2) 3)Djedkare Shemay, 4)Neferkare 2169-2167BC 1)Meryhathor, 2)Neferkare, 3)Wahkare Achthoes III, 4)Marykare, 5)............. (All Dates Unknown) Khendu, 5)Meryenhor, 6)Neferkamin, Kakare Ibi (4) 7)Nykare, 8)Neferkare Tereru, 2167-2163 9)Neferkahor Neferkare (2) 10TH Dynasty (90) 2130-2040BC Merenre Antyemsaf II (All Dates Unknown) 2163-2161BC 1)Meryibre Achthoes I, 2)............., 3)Neferkare, 2184-2183BC (1) 4)Meryibre Achthoes II, 5)Setut, 6)............., Menkare Nitocris Neferkauhor (1) Wadjkare Pepysonbe 7)Mery-........, 8)Shed-........, 9)............., 2183-2181BC (2) 2161-2160BC Inyotef II (-1) 2173-2169BC (4) 10)............., 11)............., 12)User......
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Daughter of Babylon?
    WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF BABYLON? ● Babylon was initially a minor city-state, and controlled little surrounding territory; its first four Amorite rulers did not assume the title of king. The older and more powerful states of Assyria, Elam, Isin, and Larsa overshadowed Babylon until it became the capital of Hammurabi's short-lived empire about a century later. Hammurabi (r. 1792–1750 BC) is famous for codifying the laws of Babylonia into the Code of Hammurabi. He conquered all of the cities and city states of southern Mesopotamia, including Isin, Larsa, Ur, Uruk, Nippur, Lagash, Eridu, Kish, Adab, Eshnunna, Akshak, Akkad, Shuruppak, Bad-tibira, Sippar, and Girsu, coalescing them into one kingdom, ruled from Babylon. Hammurabi also invaded and conquered Elam to the east, and the kingdoms of Mari and Ebla to the northwest. After a protracted struggle with the powerful Assyrian king Ishme-Dagan of the Old Assyrian Empire, he forced his successor to pay tribute late in his reign, spreading Babylonian power to Assyria's Hattian and Hurrian colonies in Asia Minor. After the reign of Hammurabi, the whole of southern Mesopotamia came to be known as Babylonia, whereas the north had already coalesced centuries before into Assyria. From this time, Babylon supplanted Nippur and Eridu as the major religious centers of southern Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's empire destabilized after his death. Assyrians defeated and drove out the Babylonians and Amorites. The far south of Mesopotamia broke away, forming the native Sealand Dynasty, and the Elamites appropriated territory in eastern Mesopotamia. The Amorite dynasty remained in power in Babylon, which again became a small city-state.
    [Show full text]
  • Marten Stol WOMEN in the ANCIENT NEAR EAST
    Marten Stol WOMEN IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Marten Stol Women in the Ancient Near East Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson ISBN 978-1-61451-323-0 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-1-61451-263-9 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-1-5015-0021-3 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book has been applied for at the Library of Congress. Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. Original edition: Vrouwen van Babylon. Prinsessen, priesteressen, prostituees in de bakermat van de cultuur. Uitgeverij Kok, Utrecht (2012). Translated by Helen and Mervyn Richardson © 2016 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin Cover Image: Marten Stol Typesetting: Dörlemann Satz GmbH & Co. KG, Lemförde Printing and binding: cpi books GmbH, Leck ♾ Printed on acid-free paper Printed in Germany www.degruyter.com Table of Contents Introduction 1 Map 5 1 Her outward appearance 7 1.1 Phases of life 7 1.2 The girl 10 1.3 The virgin 13 1.4 Women’s clothing 17 1.5 Cosmetics and beauty 47 1.6 The language of women 56 1.7 Women’s names 58 2 Marriage 60 2.1 Preparations 62 2.2 Age for marrying 66 2.3 Regulations 67 2.4 The betrothal 72 2.5 The wedding 93 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Foundations Unit Two CA * the Babylonians
    Marshall High School Mr. Cline Western Civilization I: Ancient Foundations Unit Two CA * The Babylonians • By the mid-20th century BC, Sumerian Civilization had already been through a lot: • It had been co opted by the Akkadians • It had been conquered by the Guti. • It had thrown off its invaders, and started a new Sumerian Empire with Ur as its capitol • Then, in 1950 BC, a new group of people entered the scene, the Elamites, a fierce people living to the southeast of Mesopotamia. • The Elamites, like the Guti before them, seem to have been more interested in pillaging than empire building. • It would take another thousand years before the Elamites would mount their own bid for control of the empire. • Nevertheless, the Elamites destroyed the power structure that held the Sumerian empire together. • After a thousand years, the Sumero-Akkadian empire was dead at last. * The Babylonians • Yet the idea of a united Mesopotamian empire lived on as new peoples tried their hand at imperialism. • With the break down of the empire at the hands of the Elamites, a new people, the Amorites, came to conquer much of southern Mesopotamia, including an important religious center called Babylon. • Like the Sumerians before them, the Amorites began by creating minor kingdoms or city states, which vied with one another for power. • The earliest of these were two cities, Isin and Larsa. • For about 200 years, these two were rivals and struggled with each other for supremacy. • Then around 1830, the city of Babylon took advantage of the distraction of these two power players and established itself as an independent kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49596-7 — the Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East Aaron A
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49596-7 — The Amorites and the Bronze Age Near East Aaron A. Burke Index More Information INDEX ꜤꜢmw (Egyptian term), 145–47 See also Asiatics “communities of practice,” 18–20, 38–40, 42, (Egypt) 347–48 decline of, 350–51 A’ali, 226 during Early Bronze Age, 31 ‘Aa-zeh-Re’ Nehesy, 316–17 Ebla, 38–40, 56, 178 Abarsal, 45 emergence of, 23, 346–47 Abda-El (Amorite), 153–54 extensification of, 18–20 Abi-eshuh, 297, 334–35 hollow cities, 178–79 Abisare (Larsa), 160 Jazira, 38, 177 Abishemu I (Byblos), 175 “land rush,” 177–78 Abraham, 6 Mari, 38–40, 56, 177–79, 227–28 abu as symbolic kinship, 268–70 Nawar, 38, 40, 42 Abu en-Ni’aj, Tell, 65 Northern Levant, 177 Abu Hamad, 54 Qatna, 179 Abu Salabikh, 100 revival of, 176–80, 357 Abusch, Tzvi, 186 Shubat Enlil, 177–78, 180 Abydos, 220 social identity of Amorites and, 10 Achaemenid Empire, 12 Urkesh, 38, 42 Achsaph, 176 wool trade and, 23 ‘Adabal (deity), 40 Yamḫ ad, 179 Adad/Hadad (deity), 58–59, 134, 209–10, 228–29, zone of uncertainty and, 24, 174 264, 309–11, 338, 364 Ahbabu, 131 Adams, Robert, 128 Ahbutum (tribe), 97 Adamsah, 109 Ahktoy III, 147 Adba-El (Mari), 153–54 Ahmar, Tell, 51–53, 56, 136, 228 Addahushu (Elam), 320 Ahmose, 341–42 Ader, 50 ‘Ai, 33 Admonitions of Ipuwer, 172 ‘Ain Zurekiyeh, 237–38 aDNA. See DNA Ajjul, Tell el-, 142, 237–38, 326, 329, 341–42 Adnigkudu (deity), 254–55 Akkadian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Mesopotamia A
    Table of Contents : 1. Mesopotamia a. Introduction 1-1 (General introduction to Mesopotamia, its geography, topography, civilization, and commerce) b. The Early Dynastic Period: Sumer (to 2316) i. Introduction 1-4 (The discovery of Sumer, cuneiform writing, religion, the ziggurats, art) ii. Sumerian Philosophy and Religion 1-8 (The Sumerian worldview, cosmology, major deities, religious philosophy and practice) iii. Sumerian Mythology 1-12 (Major mythological characters, Sumerian “paradise,” similarities and differences with the biblical accounts) iv. Mesopotamian Creation Stories 1-14 (Sumerian creation accounts, Enuma Elish, comparison to biblical account of creation) v. Gilgamesh and The Great Flood 1-16 (The major Gilgamesh myths, The Epic of Gilgamesh, discovery of the epic, comparison to biblical account of the flood) vi. The End of the Early Dynastic Period 1-18 (Loss of leadership, invasion of the Amorites) c. The Second Dynasty: Akkadian (2334 – 2193) i. Introduction 1-19 (Creation of empire in single ruler) ii. Sargon the Great 1-20 (Birth and early years, ascension, importance in unifying Sumerian world) iii. Rimush 1-21 iv. Manishtusu 1-22 v. Naram-Sin 1-22 (His general greatness and fall) vi. Shar-kali-sharri 1-23 vii. Gudea 1-23 (The invasion of the Gutians, investment in Lagash) viii. Utu-hegal 1-24 d. The Third Dynasty: Ur (2112 – 2004) i. Ur-Nammu 1-24 (Brilliance, military conquests, the ziggurats, their meaning and probable connection with the Tower of Babel) ii. Shulgi 1-26 iii. Aram-Sin 1-26 iv. Shu-Sin 1-26 v. Ibbi-Sin 1-27 (Reasons for loss of power, defeat to the Elamites, beginning of intermediate period, king lists) e.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 2 What Is an Amorite?
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/25842 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Boer, Rients de Title: Amorites in the Early Old Babylonian Period Issue Date: 2014-05-28 CHAPTER 2 What is an Amorite? 2.1 The Amorites from the Early Dynastic to the Old Babylonian period 2.1.1 Introduction In the cuneiform script the word for ‘Amorite’ is mostly written in Sumerian as MAR .TU and sometimes spelled syllabically in Akkadian as a-mu-ur-ru-(ú) = amurru (m). 4 These words also indicate ‘The West’ on the compass. 5 In the lit- erature the overlap of these terms is sometimes confusing, because people indicated as MAR .TU could also come from the area to the north east of Baby- lonia, the Jebel Hamrin. The word lacks a convincing etymology. 6 The study of the Amorites goes back a long time because they are already mentioned in the Bible. 7 4 For the lexical occurrences (and the ‘lexical confusion’ with the term Tidnum/Dita- nu), see Marchesi 2006:8 n. 20,:9 n. 23, the CAD A/2:93-94 and most recently Hrůša 2010:471-472. See Streck 2000:26-29 for a discussion of the term MAR .TU , with the com- ments by Charpin 2005/2006:283-284. See Michalowski 2011:106 for proof from the Ur III period that MAR .TU = a-mu-ru-um . 5 Despite this fact it is known that people with Amorite names lived in the area of the Persian Gulf thanks to the excavations at the island of Failaka of the coast of Kuwait.
    [Show full text]