DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient Foundations Unit Two CA * the Babylonians

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ancient Foundations Unit Two CA * the Babylonians Marshall High School Mr. Cline Western Civilization I: Ancient Foundations Unit Two CA * The Babylonians • By the mid-20th century BC, Sumerian Civilization had already been through a lot: • It had been co opted by the Akkadians • It had been conquered by the Guti. • It had thrown off its invaders, and started a new Sumerian Empire with Ur as its capitol • Then, in 1950 BC, a new group of people entered the scene, the Elamites, a fierce people living to the southeast of Mesopotamia. • The Elamites, like the Guti before them, seem to have been more interested in pillaging than empire building. • It would take another thousand years before the Elamites would mount their own bid for control of the empire. • Nevertheless, the Elamites destroyed the power structure that held the Sumerian empire together. • After a thousand years, the Sumero-Akkadian empire was dead at last. * The Babylonians • Yet the idea of a united Mesopotamian empire lived on as new peoples tried their hand at imperialism. • With the break down of the empire at the hands of the Elamites, a new people, the Amorites, came to conquer much of southern Mesopotamia, including an important religious center called Babylon. • Like the Sumerians before them, the Amorites began by creating minor kingdoms or city states, which vied with one another for power. • The earliest of these were two cities, Isin and Larsa. • For about 200 years, these two were rivals and struggled with each other for supremacy. • Then around 1830, the city of Babylon took advantage of the distraction of these two power players and established itself as an independent kingdom. • Yet Babylon was small compared to the older kingdoms around it. * The Babylonians • Surrounded by enemies, Babylon extended its power slowly. It would take the better part of a century before a Babylonian leader was brazen enough to attempt to recreate the grand Mesopotamian empire. That leader's name was Hammurabi. • Hammurabi inherited a central, but rather unimportant kingdom of Mesopotamia. • He led a well disciplined fighting force to the conquest of his Amorite rivals, Isin and Larsa, as well as the already ancient cities of Ur and Uruk. • By the time he was done, Babylon would be the seat of an empire stretching for thousands of miles. • But Hammurabi was not sated with mere conquest. • He wanted to build an empire to last. • Like Ur Nammu, he established a centralized bureaucracy with taxes. * The Babylonians • He rebuilt old imperial roads and cleared out the canals, allowing trade to form once again. • Like all Babylonian kings, Hammurabi was a member of the priestly caste and was likely considered an avatar of the city's patron deity, Marduk. • During his reign, Hammurabi established Babylon as the holiest of Mesopotamian cities, where all future emperors would need to be crowned. • Yet perhaps Hammurabi's greatest accomplishment was his Code of Laws. • It was likely inspired by the code of Ur Nammu, the law of the last great Mesopotamian empire. • While the Babylonians seem to have perfected Sumerian designs for civilization, they show little signs of invention in this period. • This copying of Sumerian accomplishments would typify all the empires that attempted to gain control of Mesopotamia. * The Babylonians • Indeed, the relics of Babylonian culture could not be easily discerned from those of the Sumerians for hundreds of years. • They built their palaces, temples and Ziggurats all along Sumerian lines, adorning them with frescoes, glazed tiles and stone steles. • Like the Sumerians, the Babylonians built with mud brick. • Some believe this is because they suffered from a lack of stone. Yet it is interesting to note that the later Assyrians, who had plenty of stone at their disposal, continued to build with mud brick after their rise to power. • This suggests that the choice of mud brick might have been a cultural appeal to an old source of legitimacy as much as it was a material necessity. • To appear legitimate, every culture to come would try to replicate the achievements of the Sumerians. • The 200 years following the fall of Ur saw the rise of two great cultures that would dominate Mesopotamia for the next millennia, the Babylonians and the Assyrians * The Babylonians • The Babylonians began as a small city state in the shadow of Agade. However, in 1894 B.C. an Amorite dynasty gained control of Babylon, and in 1813 of Assyria. • The first Amorite King of Babylon was Shamshi Adad, and under him Babylon and Assyria conquered most of northern Mesopotamia. • However, the achievement did not live beyond Shamshi Adad as the kingdom was split between his two sons, which are recorded as being lazy and overconfident, and so they lost the new empire. • With the decline of the dominant Assyria after Shamshi Adad, a new Amorite King was able to take control of Babylon, and this was the legendary Hammurabi (1792-1750 B.C.) • In 1761 B.C., Hammurabi conquered all of old Sumeria, then most of northern Mesopotamia. His most famous victory was over the City of Eshnunna, where he won by redirecting the city’s water supply. • Hammurabi was most famous for his law code, one of the most complete, though not the earliest one, to survive from the ancient world. * The Babylonians • It is most marked by the severity of its punishments, such as: • If a woman bring about the death of her husband for the sake of another man, they shall impale her, or; • If a man destroy the eye of another man, they shall destroy his eye • The law code was divided into 282 sections dealing with family, property, and commercial law, with slavery, professional fees, prices, and wages included. • The law code presents an idealized picture of Babylonian society with the King at the head and three classes below him, the awilum or property owning freemen, the mushkennum or non property owning dependents of the state, and the wardenum, or slaves. • It was a fluid society as a slave could accumulate enough wealth to become a freeman, and a freeman could find himself enslaved for non payment of debts * The Babylonians • Women and children were considered to be the property of their husbands, while the king’s relationship with his people was considered to be one of master to slaves. • The law was not available to everyone, as it was carved into a large stone stele and placed in the temple of Marduk, so that Hammurabi could demonstrate to the god what a wise and just king he was, and thereby gain his favor. • Following Hammurabi’s death, the Babylonian Empire had a period of decline where the threat of military invasion by the Hittites in the north, and the eventual sacking of Babylon by them, led to the overthrow of the Amorite Dynasty, and Babylon becoming an obscure city again. • The Need for Laws • This is Jim. This is Jim's neighbor, Tom. Jim has a cow. Tom steals Jim's cow. Jim retrieves his cow, and steals Tom's pig to boot. That'll teach Tom to steal from Jim! * The Babylonians • The Need for Laws • Unfortunately, all Tom learns from this exchange is that Jim must die. Tom kills Jim and takes back his pig and the cow. • Enraged, Jim's family descends on Tom's farm, steals all the livestock, and burns Tom's barn to the ground, with Tom inside. • Tom's family retaliates in kind, and we've got ourselves a good old- fashioned feud, one to last for generations. • Over the years, dozens of people will die, all over a stupid cow. Left to their own devices, these two families will tear each other apart, to no one's benefit. • The Importance of Judges • Enter the judge. A judge can be anyone: a priest, an elected official, a jury of peers, a king or royal appointee, a little old man on a hill. • The only real requirement for a judge is that his decisions must be respected. * The Babylonians • The Importance of Judges • That is, a judge must be obeyed; otherwise he's just a spectator with an opinion. • How judges enforce their will varies. • The priest uses fear of the gods to sway people. • The jury of peers depends on its impartiality to bind people to its verdicts. • The king can use soldiers to enforce his will. • Yet whatever the system, it allows Tom and Jim to resolve their conflict over the cow without bloodshed. • Tom steals Jim's cow; Jim goes to the judge. The judge threatens Tom with eternal damnation until he relents, or holds a trial to decide whom the cow belongs to, or simply sends soldiers to return Jim's cow to him. * The Babylonians • The Importance of Judges • However it goes, at the end of the day, Jim has his cow back without creating a longstanding vendetta with his neighbor. Thus you can see the important role of judges in society. • There is reason to believe that the role of judge may very well be the first position of authority, and that this authority evolved into chiefdoms, priesthoods, monarchies, and all the other forms of government. • At the heart of all authority is the power to make decisions for the people beneath you. • Should we invade? Where shall we build? And yes, even, 'whose cow is this? ' • The Use of Hierarchies in Law • Yet judging things is time consuming. Kings have better things to do than decide which farmer gets a cow, and emperors really can't be bothered with that sort of thing. * The Babylonians • The Use of Hierarchies in Law • To ease this burden, leaders can and do take advantage of hierarchies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neo-Assyrian Treaties As a Source for the Historian: Bonds of Friendship, the Vigilant Subject and the Vengeful KingS Treaty
    WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY Sources, Problems, and Approaches Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the University of Helsinki on September 22-25, 2014 Edited by G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger THE NEO-ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT 2019 STATE ARCHIVES OF ASSYRIA STUDIES Published by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki in association with the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Project Director Simo Parpola VOLUME XXX G.B. Lanfranchi, R. Mattila and R. Rollinger (eds.) WRITING NEO-ASSYRIAN HISTORY SOURCES, PROBLEMS, AND APPROACHES THE NEO- ASSYRIAN TEXT CORPUS PROJECT State Archives of Assyria Studies is a series of monographic studies relating to and supplementing the text editions published in the SAA series. Manuscripts are accepted in English, French and German. The responsibility for the contents of the volumes rests entirely with the authors. © 2019 by the Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Helsinki and the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research All Rights Reserved Published with the support of the Foundation for Finnish Assyriological Research Set in Times The Assyrian Royal Seal emblem drawn by Dominique Collon from original Seventh Century B.C. impressions (BM 84672 and 84677) in the British Museum Cover: Assyrian scribes recording spoils of war. Wall painting in the palace of Til-Barsip. After A. Parrot, Nineveh and Babylon (Paris, 1961), fig. 348. Typesetting by G.B. Lanfranchi Cover typography by Teemu Lipasti and Mikko Heikkinen Printed in the USA ISBN-13 978-952-10-9503-0 (Volume 30) ISSN 1235-1032 (SAAS) ISSN 1798-7431 (PFFAR) CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................. vii Giovanni Battista Lanfranchi, Raija Mattila, Robert Rollinger, Introduction ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Daughter of Babylon?
    WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF BABYLON? ● Babylon was initially a minor city-state, and controlled little surrounding territory; its first four Amorite rulers did not assume the title of king. The older and more powerful states of Assyria, Elam, Isin, and Larsa overshadowed Babylon until it became the capital of Hammurabi's short-lived empire about a century later. Hammurabi (r. 1792–1750 BC) is famous for codifying the laws of Babylonia into the Code of Hammurabi. He conquered all of the cities and city states of southern Mesopotamia, including Isin, Larsa, Ur, Uruk, Nippur, Lagash, Eridu, Kish, Adab, Eshnunna, Akshak, Akkad, Shuruppak, Bad-tibira, Sippar, and Girsu, coalescing them into one kingdom, ruled from Babylon. Hammurabi also invaded and conquered Elam to the east, and the kingdoms of Mari and Ebla to the northwest. After a protracted struggle with the powerful Assyrian king Ishme-Dagan of the Old Assyrian Empire, he forced his successor to pay tribute late in his reign, spreading Babylonian power to Assyria's Hattian and Hurrian colonies in Asia Minor. After the reign of Hammurabi, the whole of southern Mesopotamia came to be known as Babylonia, whereas the north had already coalesced centuries before into Assyria. From this time, Babylon supplanted Nippur and Eridu as the major religious centers of southern Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's empire destabilized after his death. Assyrians defeated and drove out the Babylonians and Amorites. The far south of Mesopotamia broke away, forming the native Sealand Dynasty, and the Elamites appropriated territory in eastern Mesopotamia. The Amorite dynasty remained in power in Babylon, which again became a small city-state.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Article As
    Helena Forshell ROCK ART An attempt to understand rock art motifs through ancient literature, epics of creation and the history of metals IN WORKS AND DAYS (probably written down that the different properties of the metals in the 9th century B.C.) by the Greek Hesiod, the may have brought about the growing cruelty first humans are described as a golden race, and greed of man. In which way may the so- ”living like gods without sorrow of heart, re- cial behaviour of man be influenced by the mote and free from toil and grief. When they availability of metals and knowledge of their died, it was as though they were overcome properties? First, a brief outline of the qualities with sleep … they had all good things; for of gold, silver and copper. the fruitful earth unforced bare them fruit abundantly and without stint”. “The second generation which was of silver was less no- Gold ble by far … when they were full grown and Thousands of gold occurrences, most of them were come to the full measure of there prime, less profitable have been discovered in Europe they lived only a little time and that in sorrow alone. There, and in Caucasus, Ural and the because of their foolishness, for they could Himalayas, the heavy gold has accumulated not keep from sinning and from wronging in sea-beds and rivers through erosion of the one another”. The third generation, that of rock. Already in prehistoric times, gold was bronze, was violent, ”… they ate no bread, sifted in large quantities. Parrish (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Elam Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State
    Cambridge University Press 0521563585 - The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State D. T. Potts Frontmatter More information The Archaeology of Elam Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State From the middle of the third millennium bc until the coming of Cyrus the Great, southwestern Iran was referred to in Mesopotamian sources as the land of Elam. A heterogenous collection of regions, Elam was home to a variety of groups, alternately the object of Mesopotamian aggres- sion, and aggressors themselves; an ethnic group seemingly swallowed up by the vast Achaemenid Persian empire, yet a force strong enough to attack Babylonia in the last centuries bc. The Elamite language is attested as late as the Medieval era, and the name Elam as late as 1300 in the records of the Nestorian church. This book examines the formation and transforma- tion of Elam’s many identities through both archaeological and written evidence, and brings to life one of the most important regions of Western Asia, re-evaluates its significance, and places it in the context of the most recent archaeological and historical scholarship. d. t. potts is Edwin Cuthbert Hall Professor in Middle Eastern Archaeology at the University of Sydney. He is the author of The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity, 2 vols. (1990), Mesopotamian Civilization (1997), and numerous articles in scholarly journals. © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521563585 - The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State D. T. Potts Frontmatter More information cambridge world archaeology Series editor NORMAN YOFFEE, University of Michigan Editorial board SUSAN ALCOCK, University of Michigan TOM DILLEHAY, University of Kentucky CHRIS GOSDEN, University of Oxford CARLA SINOPOLI, University of Michigan The Cambridge World Archaeology series is addressed to students and professional archaeologists, and to academics in related disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating Tablets in the Garshana Corpus
    Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference Dating Tablets in the Garshana Corpus James Hearne, Connor Anderson, Yudong Liu Dannon Dixon, Dario Fenstermacher Ritchie Computer Science Department Western Washington University Bellingham, Washington 98226 Abstract original state-owned archives from which they came, depriv- ing scholars of the ability to reconstruct local economic ac- This paper reports on an effort to assign dates to undated tivity. Tablets originally stored in the same local archive are tablets in the Garshana corpus, a fully curated and annotated now scattered throughout the world in museums and univer- collection of Sumerian tables from the Ur III era. Of the 1488 tablets, 92% are dated, giving a strong training set for dat- sities. The ability to identify dense regions of a larger social ing those undated. Two approaches were pursued: (1) a naive network, quasi-cliques, would support the assignment of a one which determined the date of a tablet by simply counting tablet to a specific but now scattered archive. Since names the name overlap with tablets of known year and (2) invok- were reused in Sumerian society, as they are in most, the ing a collection of machine learning algorithms of established identification of tablet dates is essential for such an assign- robustness. The naive method reports an accuracy of 45-55% ment. and the machine learning algorithms achieve 78.8-84.15% ac- This overarching goal requires the identification of two curacy. sorts of information from the original tablets, dates and per- sonal names. It also requires, as this study reveals, the iden- Introduction tification of geographical names.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A
    XI Sumero-Babylonian King Lists and Date Lists A. R. GEORGE The Antediluvian King List The antediluvian king list is an Old Babylonian (b) a tablet from Nippur, now in Istanbul text, composed in Sumerian, that purports to (Kraus 1952: 31) document the reigns of successive kings of (c) another reportedly from Khafaje (Tutub), remote antiquity, from the time when the gods now in Berkeley, California (Finkelstein first transmitted to mankind the institution of 1963: 40) kingship until the interruption of human histo- (d) a further tablet now in the Karpeles Manu- ry by the great Flood. The list exists in several script Library, Santa Barbara, California, versions. Sometimes it appears as the opening given below in a preliminary transliteration section of the Sumerian King List, as in text (No. 97) No. 98 below. More often it occurs as an inde- (e) a small fragment from Nippur now in Phil- pendent list, of which one example is held by adelphia that bears lines from the list fol- the Schøyen collection, published here as text lowed by other text (Peterson 2008). No. 96. Other examples of the Old Babylonian A more extensive treatment of the lists of ante- list of antediluvian kings copied independently diluvian kings, including No. 96 and the tablet of the Sumerian King List are: in the Karpeles Manuscript Library, is promised (a) the tablet W-B 62, of uncertain prove- by Gianni Marchesi as part of his forthcoming nance and now in the Ashmolean Museum larger study of the Sumerian king lists. (Langdon 1923 pl. 6) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade from Assyrian Aššur to Anatolian Kaneš in the 19Th Century B.C.E
    Journal of Management and Marketing Research Trade from Assyrian Aššur to Anatolian Kaneš in the 19th Century B.C.E. M. Wayne Alexander Minnesota State University Moorhead William Violet Minnesota State University Moorhead ABSTRACT Evidence of trade in the Ancient Near East between Aššur in Assyria, now northern Iraq, and Kaneš in Anatolia, now central Turkey, comes from Cuneiform writing on over 23,000 clay tiles unearthed at Kaneš. The tiles tell of 19 th century B.C.E. Assyrian traders who established a trading colony at Kaneš. Merchants in Aššur imported tin and textiles from the east and south, packed them into bags, and loaded the bags on donkeys. Transporters led caravans of 10 to 50 donkeys some 1200 kilometers over rough, narrow roads to Kaneš. After the proper taxes were paid traders sold the tin, textiles, and donkeys in the market for silver which they sent back to Aššur to start the process anew. To facilitate buying and selling the merchants drew up contracts and wrote letters concerning purchases, sales, and market conditions. The trade proved quite profitable but ended with the violent destruction of Kaneš. Keywords: Aššur, Kaneš, Trade in the19th Century B.C.E., Assyria, Anatolia Copyright statement: Authors retain the copyright to the manuscripts published in AABRI journals. Please see the AABRI Copyright Policy at http://www.aabri.com/copyright.html Trade Aššur to Kaneš, Page 1 Journal of Management and Marketing Research INTRODUCTION Traders bought, sold, and moved goods from one place to another in prehistoric Mesopotamia as early as the eighth millennium. For example, people transported obsidian (7500-3500 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Karduniaš. Babylonia Under the Kassites
    557 BIBLIOTHECA ORIENTALIS LXXV N° 5-6, september-december 2018 558 §2 The Early Kassite Period (pp. 45-92) by Frans van Koppen The generally neglected Early Kassite period is discussed at length by van Koppen. This chapter provides an in-depth study discussing first the Kassites in the Old Babylonian period and their military background, i.e., military specializa- tion, command structure, settlements and social organization, followed by a careful description of Kassite-Babylonian interactions in the Late Old Babylonian period, i.e., the Samḫarû and Bimatû under Ammī-ṣaduqa and the Kassite kingdoms in the Diyala under Samsu-ditāna, and finally the role of the Kassites in the Fall of Babylon and their position thereafter. §3 Political Interactions between Kassite Babylonia and Assyria, Egypt and Ḫatti during the Amarna Age (pp. 93-111) by Jared L. Miller Miller focuses on political history in the Late Bronze Age, providing a concise introduction to the political interactions between Kassite Babylonia and its neighbours in the Amarna Age. An interesting contribution is Miller’s update of the chronological synchronisms between Babylon, Assyria, Egypt and Ḫatti, resulting in a helpful chart (pp. 105-106). Finally, an enticing scenario is presented, based on a passage in a prayer of Muršili II (KUB 14.4 ii 3’-8’) regarding the Hittite tawannanna, the Babylonian wife of Šuppiluliuma I: here, Miller advocates a different reading than hitherto accepted, suggesting that she was siphoning off wealth from Hattuša to Babylon and discusses its possible political implications. §4 Of Kings, Princesses, and Messengers: Babylonia’s ASSYRIOLOGIE International Relations during the 13th century BC (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • BC Program Credit & Course Guidelines 2018-2019
    BC Program Credit & Course Guidelines 2018-2019 Program of Study Program Credit & Course Specific Requirements Requirements per semester Argentina Universidad Torcuato 12 credits (3 regular courses) Di Tella (UTDT) + Early start intensive language course (3 credits) Universidad Catolica 12 UCA semester credits Students who do not pass the language Argentina (UCA) + Early start intensive language placement test must enroll in a semester- course long Spanish language course as part of their 12 credit course load. *One course must be taken with locals Australia Monash University 24 credit points University of 50 points Melbourne University of New 24 credits South Wales University of Notre 125 credit points (5 courses) One unit can be at the 100 level; the rest Dame must be at the 200 or 300 levels. University of 8 units (4 courses) Queensland University of Western 24 points (4 courses) Australia University of Sydney 24 credit points Austria Vienna University of 30 ECTS credits + Pre-semester All students must enroll in German Business Economics and German language course (1 BC credit) Communication as part of their 30 ECTS Business (WU) (must be taken for grade) course load. Brazil PUC-Rio 15-16 PUC credits (min. 4 courses) All students must enroll in the semester-long + Early start intensive language Portuguese language program as part of their course (1 BC credit) 15-16 credit course load. Chile PUC-Chile 50 PUC credits All students must enroll in the Semanario de + Early start intensive language cultura chilena (Chilean culture course) as course part of their 50 credit course load. 1 BC Program Credit & Course Guidelines 2018-2019 Program of Study Program Credit & Course Specific Requirements Requirements per semester Universidad Alberto 50 AH credits All students must enroll in the intensive early Hurtado (AH) start language program as part of their 50 credit course load.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortal Kings of Ur: a Short Century of Divine
    3 THE MORTAL KINGS OF UR: A SHORT CENTURY OF DIVINE RULE IN ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA PIOTR MICHALOWSKI, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Assyriologists are at a disadvantage whenever the subject of divine kingship comes up. The issue is not an old one, but it has its lingering ghosts, James Frazer and Edward Evans­ Prichard, and it has its favorite haunting ground, the continent of Africa and the island of Mad­ agascar. Ever since Frazer delineated the problem in 1890, the focus of investigation has been on Africa, and the definition has encompassed three central components: duality, regicide, and the mediating role of the king. Of the three, regicide has been the most contentious issue, but it is one that is hardly important outside of the Africanist debates. Moreover, as Kasja Ekholm Friedman (1985: 250) has written, some have viewed divine kingship as "an autonomous sym­ bolic structure that can only be understood in terms of its own internal symbolic structure." Writing about the Lower Congo (Friedman 1985: 251), she undertook to demonstrate that "it is a historical product which has undergone transformations connected to the general structural change that has turned Africa into an underdeveloped periphery of the West." Here, I follow her example and attempt to locate the eruptions of early Mesopotamian divine kingship as historically defined phenomena, rather than as moments in a developmental trajectory of an autonomous symbolic structure. Most studies of the early history of Mesopotamian kingship concentrate on the develop­ ment of a specific figure in text and art; the underlying notions are social evolutionary, and the methodology is philological, often relying on etymology and the study of the occurrence and history of lexical labels, as summarized well in a recent article by Nicole Brisch (forth­ coming).
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM
    Babylonian Empire 9/13/11 3:47 PM home : index : ancient Mesopotamia : article by Jona Lendering © Babylonian Empire The Babylonian Empire was the most powerful state in the ancient world after the fall of the Assyrian empire (612 BCE). Its capital Babylon was beautifully adorned by king Nebuchadnezzar, who erected several famous buildings. Even after the Babylonian Empire had been overthrown by the Persian king Cyrus the Great (539), the city itself remained an important cultural center. Old Babylonian Period Kassite Period Old Babylonian Period Middle Babylonian Period Assyrian Period King Hammurabi and Šamaš Capital of the stele with the Laws The city of Babylon makes its first appearance in our sources after the Neo-Babylonian Period of Hammurabi (Louvre) fall of the Empire of the Third Dynasty of Ur, which had ruled the city Later history states of the alluvial plain between the rivers Euphrates and Tigris for Related more than a century (2112-2004?). An agricultural crisis meant the Mesopotamian Kings end of this centralized state, and several more or less nomadic tribes Chronology settled in southern Mesopotamia. One of these was the nation of the Amorites ("westerners"), which took over Isin, Larsa, and Babylon. Their kings are known as the First Dynasty of Babylon (1894-1595?). The area was reunited by Hammurabi, a king of Babylon of Amorite descent (1792-1750?). From his reign on, the alluvial plain of southern Iraq was called, with a deliberate archaism, Mât Akkadî, "the country of Akkad", after the city that had united the region centuries before. We call it Babylonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Death in Sumerian Literary Texts
    Death in Sumerian Literary Texts Establishing the Existence of a Literary Tradition on How to Describe Death in the Ur III and Old Babylonian Periods Lisa van Oudheusden s1367250 Research Master Thesis Classics and Ancient Civilizations – Assyriology Leiden University, Faculty of Humanities 1 July 2019 Supervisor: Dr. J.G. Dercksen Second Reader: Dr. N.N. May Table of Content Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... 4 Chapter One: Introducing the Texts ............................................................................... 5 1.1 The Sources .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Main Sources ................................................................................................. 6 1.1.3 Secondary Sources ......................................................................................... 7 1.2 Problems with Date and Place .............................................................................. 8 1.3 History of Research ............................................................................................ 10 Chapter Two: The Nature of Death .............................................................................. 12 2.1 The God Dumuzi ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]