<<

KEY FINDINGS OF STUDIES ON EXPANDING AND IMPROVING THE DISTRICT IN THE CANTON AND UTILIZATION OF RENEWABLE(NASLOVNA) IN BIH

IRENA’s workshop: Benefits: Can South East Europe realise the full potential of the Energy Transition? 11 June 2019, Sarajevo Project & main reasons to conduct Studies Project: Improving air quality in Bosnia and through renewable energy sources and improvements in district heating: • Feasibility Study on expanding and improving the district heating system in the Canton of Sarajevo • Study on renewable energy sources with focus on , and in Main reasons: • According to 2018 WHO statistics, Bosnia and Herzegovina has the 2nd highest European mortality rate attributed to air pollution. • 44,000 years of life are lost each year due to air pollution in BiH (European Environment Agency). • Losing 21.5% of its GDP to costs associated with premature deaths caused by air pollution (WHO). District heating systems in BiH

GodišnjaAnnual proizvodnjaproduction toplotne of the energije heat energy(MWh) (MWh)

KJKP "Toplane - Sarajevo" d.o.o. Sarajevo 421,021 "Centralno grijanje" d.d. 326,000 "Toplana" a.d. 190,000 JP "Grijanje" d.o.o. 180,000 "Gradska toplana" a.d. 82,000 JP "Grijanje" d.o.o. 60,864 "Toplana" a.d. 56,000 Toplana - "UNIS Energetika" d.o.o. 47,690 JP "Rad" * 46,080 JP "Toplana" d.d. Tešanj 22,872 " stan" a.d. Zvornik 18,585 JKP "Radnik" d.o.o. Zavidovići * 16,256 PJ "Toplana" Gradiška 15,840 "Gradske toplane" a.d. Pale 15,052 JP "Toplana" d.o.o. Banovići * 14,925 "BAGS Energotehnika" d.d. Vogošća 12,086 Termo Nova d.o.o. * 11,791 "Eko toplane" d.o.o. Gračanica 10,000 JKP "" Sokolac * 8,346 JP "Gradska toplana" 7,759 JP "Komunalno" Žepče 6,900 JP "Gradska toplana" Čelinac 6,800 JP "9. Septembar" * 5,120 Toplana - "UNIS Energetika" d.o.o. 4,150 Toplana OR "Bade" * 4,080 Toplane - INS a.d. Istočno Sarajevo 4,000 JP "Komunalno" Breza 3,000 ESCO ECO ENERGIJA d.o.o. 3,000 JP "Grijanje" d.o.o. Zenica - Toplana Nemila 2,800 "Kvatro" d.o.o. Bugojno * 2,040 "UNIS-Energetika" d.o.o. Sarajevo 2,000 KP "Komunalac" d.d. 1,151 District heating systems in BiH

Currently, there are 32 DHS active and Share of fuels in DHS 1 3 companies under bankruptcy. Heat; 39% ; 27% Woody biomass; 19% Average age of the ; 14% 2 installed in the DHS is 26 years. Heavy ; 1%

1% Average age of the distribution 14% 3 grid in DHS is 21 years. 39% 4 Share of the DHS in BiH is 8%. 19%

27% The methodology for assessing the potential of RES in DHS in BiH

Proposal of conceptual solutions for 20 district heating systems. Areas that meet at least one of the following criteria were analysed: − In the present state they use fossil fuels in DH, − Have potential to expand the heat demand/heat distribution network − Use outdated technology (even though using RES) − There is no district heating, but there is a clear plan for its construction (feasibility studies, etc.). For each analysed location, solar energy, biomass and geothermal energy are estimated. Technical potential of wood biomass for district heating (GJ/km²) Levelised cost of heat - LCOH

BAM/MWh LCOH at the room outlets (BAM/MWh) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Estimated reduction of emissions of air pollutants Caused by the implementation of all recommended conceptual solutions. 4,000

3,500

3,000

2,500 Current emissions of air pollutants

2,000 t/a Emissions of air pollutants after 1,500 implementation of proposed solutions for DHS 1,000

500

- sulfur dioxide particulate nitrogen matter oxides Total investment for recommended designs and share of RE in DHS by scenarios

Used potential of Share of DHS in the Investment Energy source biomass and total consumption of Scenario (x 1.000 BAM) geothermal energy energy for the [PJ/a] heating Biomass 182.930 20% of use of the technical potential of 4.67 14 % Geothermal energy 12.800 biomass and geothermal energy (S1) Solar energy 24.500 50 % of use of the technical potential 11.67 24 % Natural gas 58.000 of biomass and geothermal energy (S2)

Fuel oil 6.520 100 % of use of the technical potential 23.34 41 % Total 284.750 of biomass and geothermal energy (S3) District heating systems in

Energy consumption in SC Three major DHS companies managed NG (DHS); 30% 1 by public and private companies NG (individual); 24% Electricity; 6% LFO; 1% Coal; 21% 2 Installed capacity 597 MW Firewood; 17% Pellet & Bricket; 1%

Total heated area – current 1% 3 situation 3,560,375 m2 17% 30%

Share of the RES in the Sarajevo 4 Canton DHS is 0%. 21%

1% 24% 6% Analised scenarios

SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 3

➢ Increased efficiency and ➢ SCENARIO Increased efficiency and environmental performance of 2 environmental performance of the current DHS the current DHS ➢ Expansion of the DHS ➢ Increased efficiency and ➢ Expansion of the DHS ➢ Natural gas environmental performance of ➢ Hot water from TPP Kakanj ➢ RE share 0% the current DHS ➢ Natural gas ➢ Investment: 146.612.129 BAM ➢ Expansion of the DHS ➢ RE share 0% ➢ Natural gas + RES ➢ Investment: 368.305.835 BAM ➢ RE share 13.6% ➢ Investment: 171.568.799 BAM Challenges Providing heating in areas with individual houses in Sarajevo Canton

➢ 49 settlements in 9 municipalities ➢ 75.057 individual houses ➢ 162.230 inhabitants

Zones connected to DHS Zones not connected to DHS Value according to the Guidance of the Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/ EU Recommended reduced value *

* Comprehensive Assessment of the Potential for Efficient District Heating and Cooling and for High-Efficient in Austria, 2016 Challenges Providing heating in areas with individual houses in Sarajevo Canton

Criteria according to the Guidance of the Technical feasibility criteria: Energy Efficiency Directive 2012/27/ EU Maintaining normal hydraulic operating mode in the case of 3 connecting users at the Plot ratio 1 highest elevations

Complex resolution of the 4 property-legal relations for laying pipelines Heat density 2 (MWh/km2, MWh/m)

5 Limited street width Challenges Citizens are ready to change the heating source under certain Poll survey in Sarajevo Canton conditions Willingness to switch to the DH Conditions for switching to District Heating System 100% 100% 90% 80% 80% 70% 60% 60% 40% 50% 20% 40% 30% 0% 20% Stup II Stup I Butmir Velešići Pofalići II i I 10% DrugoOther 0% DaYES imam, if I 24have sata a grijanje24-hour heating Stup II Stup I Butmir Velešići Pofalići II i I DaYES, me ifnecosts košta are više lower nego štothan sada current plaćamprice Da,YES, bezunconditionally uslova Da,YES, swith određenim certain conditions uslovima NeNO AkoYES, ne if moramI don‘t sam/samaneed to paysnositiconnection troškove priključenjacosts Challenges Households income have an impact on the choice of energy Poll survey in Sarajevo Canton sources in Sarajevo Canton 60

50

40

30 % 20

10

0 0-400 401-800 801-1500 1501-2001 2001- BAM -10

KM KM KM Natural gas Electricity Coal Wood Pellet Wood+coal Linear (Natural gas) Linear (Coal) Challenges Citizens are ready to change the heating source under certain Data form EMIS, UNDP conditions Thank you for your attention

More info at: http://www.ba.undp.org/content/dam/bosnia_and_herzegovina/docs/News/E&E%20Sector/DistrictHeating/Summary%20 Feasibility%20Study%20District%20Heating%20Canton%20Sarajevo.pdf About: Feasibility study on the expanding and improving of the district heating system in the Sarajevo Canton - Summary http://www.ba.undp.org/content/dam/bosnia_and_herzegovina/docs/News/E&E%20Sector/DistrictHeating/Summary%20 Study%20Renewable%20Energy%20Sources%20in%20Bosnia%20and%20Herzegovina.pdf About: Study of renewable energy sources with focus on biomass, geothermal energy and solar energy in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Summary

Elvis Hadžikadić Project Manager, Green Economic Development Project +387 33 293 485 [email protected]