DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Letter to Espoo IC on Ugljevik III Lawsuit August 2017 0.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Letter to Espoo IC on Ugljevik III Lawsuit August 2017 0.Pdf To whom it may concern, In relation to case EIA/IC/INFO/16 on Ugljevik thermal power plant, we would like to inform you of some new developments regarding the case. In parallel with the information form submitted to the Espoo Convention Implementation Committee, as was explained in the text of the form, a court complaint was filed to the Banja Luka District Court on 13 December 2013, filed under number 11 0 U 013268 13 U. The complaint covered various procedural issues, the lack of transboundary consultations and the lack of a Plan for the Prevention of Major Accidents. In addition to this, on 16 December 2014 a complaint was submitted by Center for Environment to the Energy Community Dispute Settlement Mechanism.1 This complaint included issues which were discovered only after the court complaint had been submitted, regarding the emission limit values of the coal power plant. A scientific analysis of the Environmental Impact Assessment document showed that the figures provided on emissions to air were internally inconsistent and could not possibly be correct.2 Therefore it was impossible for the Environmental Impact Assessment to properly analyse the plants’ impact on the environment, domestically or transboundary. The complaint to the District Court was rejected in verdict no 11 0 U 013268 13 U of 24.9.2015. A court appeal against the verdict and seeking the cancellation of the environmental permit for the Ugljevik III power plant was filed to the Supreme Court of Republika Srpska by the Center for Environment on November 13, 2015. On 31 May 2017 the Supreme Court reached its verdict, upheld our complaint, modified the verdict of the District Court, and annulled the environmental permit for Ugljevik III (See Annex 1). However, on 24 July 2017 the Republika Srpska Ministry of Spatial Planning, Construction and Ecology issued a new Environmental Permit (reference number 15.04-96-120/13) without any kind of public information and consultation process (See Annex 2). On 29.08.2017 Center for Environment submitted an administrative lawsuit to the Banja Luka District Court requesting the cancellation of the revised Environmental Permit. 1 https://bankwatch.org/sites/default/files/complaint-EnCom-Ugljevik-16Dec2014.pdf 2 https://bankwatch.org/news-media/for-journalists/press-releases/environmental-impact-assessment-new- bosnia-herzegovina-coa The main points of the lawsuit are as follows: In the Environmental Permit, the Ministry claims that there is no evidence of the presence of dangerous substances in the plant in quantities larger than those laid out in Articles 5 and 6 of the Regulation (Pravilnik) on installations that may be put into operation only if they possess an environmental permit, and that the installation therefore does not fall into the category of installations which may cause major accidents and therefore does not need a Plan for the Prevention of Major Accidents. In the permit, it is stated that for the purposes of Ugljevik 3 power plant, in order to start the boilers, 1720 tonnes of light fuel oil will be used, and 86 kg of hydrogen. However this data cannot be found in the EIA study from 2013, on which both the 2013 and new environmental permit were based. In the EIA, no quantities are given, and instead of light fuel oil, heavy fuel oil is mentioned, which significantly changes the classification of hazardous substances. This means that there appears to be no evidence supporting the conclusion that the plant is not an installation which could cause major accidents and does not need a prevention Plan. The Ministry claimed in its Decision to issue the environmental permit that the plant will not have significant transboundary impacts and that none of the neighbouring countries or entities had requested consultations. However it offers no evidence to prove that there will not be significant transboundary impacts. Indeed, the 2013 EIA is currently subject to a dispute settlement procedure at the Energy Community precisely because of the fact that the data on emissions to air is demonstrably wrong and therefore does not allow the environmental impact of the plant – local or transboundary – to be assessed. In addition, the other Entity, Brčko district and other state could hardly express interest in being consulted when they had not been notified about the construction of Ugljevik 3. In fact, after a complaint was sent to the Espoo Convention Implementation Committee by the Center for Environment, the report of its 37th session in December 2016, mentions Serbia’s interest and wish to be informed about the transboundary impact of Ugljevik 3. The description of waste water sources, quality and treatment defined in the Environmental Impact Assessment is very inadequate. It doesn’t give a clear picture how effluents will be treated, which composition they will have and what will be the real impact of effluents released in the Mezgraja river. Chapter 11 of the EIA does not provide any useful information on the impact on human health from Ugljevik 3, especially considering the fact that RiTE Ugljevik already exists in the immediate vicinity and will have a cumulative influence in the future. The coal store for the plant is of a scale (capacity 303 600 tonnes) that would require an environmental impact assessment, but this has been neither included in the Ugljevik III EIA nor required separately. In addition to this, on 28 July 2017 the Energy Community Secretariat sent an opening letter to Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the Ugljevik III coal power plant,3 thus signaling the official start of a dispute settlement procedure on the case. In light of these very recent developments, we ask the Espoo Convention Secretariat to bring this additional information to the attention of the Implementation Committee during the 39th Session taking place between 5-7 September and to continue consideration to the case under the “information gathering” procedure. We will keep you informed of any further developments in the case. Kind regards, Annex 1 – Supreme Court Verdict, 31.05.2017 Annex 2 – Updated environmental permit for Ugljevik III, 24.07.2017 Annex 3 – Court case against updated environmental permit, submitted 29.08.2017 3 https://energy-community.org/news/Energy-Community-News/2017/08/08.html .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Law Amending the Law on the Courts of The
    LAW AMENDING THE LAW ON COURTS OF THE REPUBLIKA SRPSKA Article 1 In the Law on Courts of the Republika Srpska (“Official Gazette of the Republika Srpska”, No: 37/12) in Article 26, paragraph 1, lines b), e), l) and nj) shall be amended to read as follows: “b) the Basic Court in Bijeljina, for the territory of the Bijeljina city, and Ugljevik and Lopare municipalities,”, “e) the Basic Court in Doboj, for the territory of Doboj city and Petrovo and Stanari municipalities,”, “l) the Basic Court in Prijedor, for the territory of Prijedor city, and Oštra Luka and Kozarska Dubica municipalities,” and “nj) the Basic Court in Trebinje, for the territory of Trebinje city, and Ljubinje, Berkovići, Bileća, Istočni Mostar, Nevesinje and Gacko municipalities,”. Article 2 In Article 28, in line g), after the wording: “of this Law” and comma punctuation mark, the word: “and” shall be deleted. In line d), after the wording: “of this Law”, the word: “and” shall be added as well as the new line đ) to read as follows: “đ) the District Court in Prijedor, for the territories covered by the Basic Courts in Prijedor and Novi Grad, and for the territory covered by the Basic Court in Kozarska Dubica in accordance with conditions from Article 99 of this Law.” Article 3 In Article 29, line g), after the wording: “the District Commercial Court in Trebinje”, the word: “and” shall be deleted and a comma punctuation mark shall be inserted. In line d), after the wording: “the District Commercial Court in East Sarajevo”, the word: “and” shall be added as well as the
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Essay Competition “Tackling Youth Unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina: My Generation's View” List of All Particip
    Youth Essay Competition “Tackling Youth Unemployment in Bosnia and Herzegovina: My Generation’s View” List of All Participants of the Competition Names 1. Admir Čavalić, Tuzla 2. Admir Karadža, Bugojno 3. Admira Tahirović, Sarajevo 4. Adnan Muminović, Sarajevo 5. Aida Mujezinović, Tešanj 6. Aida Sadagić, Sarajevo 7. Ajdin Čagalj, Sarajevo 8. Ajdin Perčo, Sarajevo 9. Ajka Baručić and Lejla Ahmetagić, Tuzla 10. Ajla Kurspahić, Sarajevo 11. Alaudina Boškailo, Čapljina 12. Albinko Hasić 13. Aleksandar Crnovčić, Banja Luka 14. Aleksandar Jovanović, Ugljevik 15. Aleksandra Gojić, Doboj 16. Alen Džananović, Sarajevo 17. Alija Bajramović, Sarajevo 18. Amela Habibić, Turbe 19. Amila Biogradlija, Zenica 20. Amila Pozderac, Bihać 21. Amra Kandić 22. Anamarija Ljubić, Široki Brijeg 23. Anela Zorlak, Goražde 24. Anesa Omanović, Sarajevo 25. Arslan Berbić, Tuzla 26. Azra Aljkanović, Sarajevo 27. Belmin Selimbegović, Sarajevo 28. Berina Kapetanović, Sarajevo 29. Berina Porča, Sarajevo 30. Biljana Popović, Banja Luka 31. Boban Sašić, Kneževo 32. Boris Drobić, Brčko 33. Boris Lalić, Sarajevo 34. Boriša Stevanović, Bijeljina 35. Branko Vasiljević, Banja Luka 36. Damir Kurtagić, Sarajevo 37. Dario Milić 38. Divna Kosović, Mostar 39. Dragana Krcum, Mostar 40. Dragana Marinković, Budapest, Hungary 41. Dragana Pavlović, Bijeljina 42. Elvira Ganibegović 43. Dženita Hukić, Sarajevo 44. Ediba Softić, Tuzla 45. Edin Pašović, Sarajevo 46. Edvin Sinanović, Zavidovići 47. Elma Cuprija, Visoko 48. Ema Mustafić, Bihać 49. Emil Ahmagić, Sarajevo 50. Emina Čamdžić, Sarajevo 51. Emina Rekanović, Sarajevo 52. Emina Vranić, Sarajevo 53. Emir Šabanić, Sarajevo 54. Ena Muratspahić, Sarajevo 55. Enes Tinjić, Tuzla 56. Evelin Trako, Sarajevo 57. Fahira Brodlija, Sarajevo 58. Fatima Muhamedagić, Pećigrad 59. Haris Softić, Tuzla 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Divided Sarajevo: Space Management, Urban Landscape and Spatial Practices Across the Boundary Bassi, Elena
    www.ssoar.info Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary Bassi, Elena Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bassi, E. (2015). Divided Sarajevo: space management, urban landscape and spatial practices across the boundary. Europa Regional, 22.2014(3-4), 101-113. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-461616 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • Zakon O Izmjeni I Dopuni Zakona O
    Na osnovu člana IV. 4.a) Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine, Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine, na 50. sjednici Predstavničkog doma, održanoj 18. jula 2013. godine, i na 33. sjednici Doma naroda, održanoj 5. novembra 2013. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O IZMJENI I DOPUNI ZAKONA O JEDINSTVENOM MATIČNOM BROJU Član 1. U Zakonu o jedinstvenom matičnom broju ("Službeni glasnik BiH", br. 32/01, 63/08 i 103/11), član 5. mijenja se i glasi: ''Član 5. Registri (IV. grupe) u Republici Srpskoj su: 1. Broj registra 11 za registraciona područja: Banja Luka, Čelinac, Gradiška, Istočni Drvar, Jezero, Kneževo, Kostajnica, Kotor Varoš, Kozarska Dubica, Krupa na Uni, Kupres, Laktaši, Mrkonjić Grad, Novi Grad, Oštra Luka, Petrovac, Prijedor, Prnjavor, Ribnik, Srbac i Šipovo. 2. Broj registra 12 za registraciona područja: Bijeljina, Brod, Derventa, Doboj, Donji Žabar, Lopare, Modriča, Pelagićevo, Petrovo, Teslić, Ugljevik, Vukosavlje i Šamac. 3. Broj registra 13 za registraciona područja: Bileća, Berkovići, Bratunac, Čajniče, Foča, Gacko, Han Pijesak, Istočna Ilidža, Istočni Mostar, Istočni Stari Grad, Istočno Novo Sarajevo, Kalinovik, Ljubinje, Milići, Nevesinje, Novo Goražde, Osmaci, Pale, Rogatica, Rudo, Srebrenica, Sokolac, Šekovići, Trebinje, Trnovo, Višegrad, Vlasenica i Zvornik. Registar (IV. grupe) za Brčko Distrikt Bosne i Hercegovine je: 1. Broj registra 14 za registraciono područje: Brčko Distrikt Bosne i Hercegovine. Registri (IV. grupe) u Federaciji Bosne i Hercegovine su: 1. Broj registra 15 za registraciona područja: Čapljina, Čitluk, Grude, Jablanica, Konjic, Ljubuški, Mostar, Neum, Posušje, Prozor, Ravno, Stolac i Široki Brijeg. 2. Broj registra 16 za registraciona područja: Bihać, Bosanska Krupa, Bosanski Petrovac, Bosansko Grahovo, Bužim, Cazin, Drvar, Glamoč, Ključ, Kupres, Livno, Sanski Most, Tomislavgrad i Velika Kladuša.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 14, No. 9 (D) – November 2002 I am trying to get two foreigners’ department officers fired. They were from PSC [public security center] Prijedor. A seventeen-year-old from Romania had 500 clients, was beaten and maltreated…. I met the girl again, [and she refused to speak to the local police inspector. She told us that] the inspector [went] to the brothel and stamped the passports with the inspectors from the foreigners’ department who used the girls for free. Testimony to Human Rights Watch Hundreds of nightclubs dot the landscape throughout Bosnia and Herzegovina. Some contain trafficked women and girls trapped in debt bondage. (c) Human Rights Watch HOPES BETRAYED: Trafficking of Women and Girls to Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina for Forced Prostitution 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] November 2002 Volume 14 No. 9 (D) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA HOPES BETRAYED: Trafficking of Women and Girls to Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina for Forced Prostitution I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................................4 II. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................7 To the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina......................................................................................................................7 To the United Nations..............................................................................................................................................................8 To the U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese-Built Coal Projects in Europe for More Information: a Real and Immediate Threat to the EU’S Decarbonisation Efforts
    14 September 2020 14 September 2020 Chinese-built coal projects in Europe For more information: A real and immediate threat to the EU’s decarbonisation efforts Pippa Gallop Senior Energy Advisor SEE (Coal, Hydro, State aid) [email protected] Ioana Ciuta Energy Coordinator (Coal and air pollution) [email protected] Wawa Wang Senior Advisor (EU-China and Trade) [email protected] Coal for Stanari project in Bosnia and Herzegovina (October, 2019), Credit: Xinhua News 1. Context With nine EU member states now coal-free1 and 11 more planning to end electricity generation from coal by 2030, the coal phase out in the EU is well underway. 52 coal plants have closed in the EU since 2016, while the European Union has stepped up its commitment to climate change mitigation and has set out a path to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The EU is also committed to ensuring that its COVID-19 recovery package delivers on the ambition of its European Green Deal, helping Europe to lead the world in climate and environmental action. China, however, is allowing its State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) specializing in power generation and coal technologies to enable the construction of new units of coal-fired power stations across southeast Europe. Chinese SOEs and state media assert that these coal-fired power plants are environmentally friendly projects that contribute to environmental and social improvements. bankwatch.org www.ve.dk In 2019, the European Commission in its Strategic Outlook in EU-China relations underlined that: “...China is constructing coal-fired power stations in many countries; 1 Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapa Katastarskih Opština Republike Srpske
    Mapa katastarskih opština Republike Srpske Donja Gradina Čuklinac Glavinac Kostajnica Petrinja Mlinarice Draksenić Babinac Bačvani Tavija Demirovac Suvaja KOSTAJNICA Jošik Vrioci Međeđa Mrakodol Gornja Johova Komlenac Orahova Slabinja Grdanovac Ševarlije Donja Slabinja Kozarska Kozarska Verija Dubica 1 Dubica 2 Mrazovci Bok Gumnjani Klekovci Jankovac Tuključani Gašnica Kalenderi Podoška Pobrđani Dobrljin Mraovo Dizdarlije Jasenje Parnice Novoselci Gunjevci Polje Hadžibajir Ličani Mačkovac Čelebinci Aginci Sključani Božići Donje Gradiška 1 Orubica Kuljani Sreflije Bistrica Kozinci Pobrđani Veliko KOZARSKA DUBICA Čitluk Dvorište Brekinje Bijakovac Greda Gornje Furde Ušivac Pucari Gornja Dolina Vodičevo Malo Bosanski Brod Vlaškovci Jelovac Čatrnja Brestovčina Donje Vodičevo Dvorište Gradiška 2 Kadin Novo Selo Bjelajci Donja Dolina Poloj Sovjak Gaj Strigova Međuvođe Gornje Jablanica Trebovljani Murati Mirkovci Vlaknica Ravnice Odžinci Sreflije Liskovac Dumbrava Miloševo Brdo Žeravica Laminci Jaružani Cerovica Vrbaška Bardača Močila Križanova Laminci Sijekovac Donja Gornja Rakovica Bukovac Laminci Brezici Srednji Srbac Selo Gradina Močila Gornja Prusci Hajderovci Brusnik Čikule Kolibe Donje Velika Lješljani Donji Jelovac Bajinci Gornjoselci Mala Žuljevica Kriva Rijeka Sjeverovci Srbac Mjesto Kaoci Žuljevica Maglajci Koturovi Lužani Grabašnica Jutrogošta Laminci Dubrave Dugo Polje Vojskova Dubrave Liješće Mlječanica Devetaci Bukvik Rasavac Poljavnice Donji Podgradci Kobaš Mazići Rakovac Košuća Kolibe Gornje Nova Ves Novo Selo Zbjeg Dragelji
    [Show full text]
  • National and Confessional Image of Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 36 Issue 5 Article 3 10-2016 National and Confessional Image of Bosnia and Herzegovina Ivan Cvitković University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cvitković, Ivan (2016) "National and Confessional Image of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 36 : Iss. 5 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol36/iss5/3 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONAL AND CONFESSIONAL IMAGE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA1 Ivan Cvitković Ivan Cvitković is a professor of the sociology of religion at the University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He obtained the Master of sociological sciences degree at the University in Zagreb and the PhD at the University in Ljubljana. His field is sociology of religion, sociology of cognition and morals and religions of contemporary world. He has published 33 books, among which are Confession in war (2005); Sociological views on nationality and religion (2005 and 2012); Social teachings in religions (2007); and Encountering Others (2013). e-mail: [email protected] The population census offers great data for discussions on the population, language, national, religious, social, and educational “map of people.” Due to multiple national and confessional identities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, such data have always attracted the interest of sociologists, political scientists, demographers, as well as leaders of political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2010
    REGULATORY COMMISSION FOR ENERGY OF REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2010 Trebinje, May 2011 PREFACE The Annual Report of the Regulatory Commission for Energy of Republic of Srpska, which is in front of you, contains a detailed overview of operations of Regulatory Commission in 2010. The activities of Regulatory Commission in 2010, were done following the plan of business activities and approved budget, always taking into account the basic mission of Regulatory Commission which is meant by establishment and improvement of the regulatory framework required for functioning of the energy sector in Republic of Srpska in a way which will, in market circumstances, provide safety of supply of customers with energy and sustainable development through protection of environment, energy efficiency and use of renewable energy sources. Doing activities within competences and obligations prescribed by laws, compliance with, made in advance, and published rules, procedure and methodology, transparency of work which includes consultations with the public while making decisions ‐ are the basic principles of work of the Regulatory Commission. In the sixth year of operations, Regulatory Commission expanded its activities to the sector of oil and oil derivatives, by issuing first licenses for doing activities to the companies in this sector. In the electric power sector, the activities related to issuance of licenses for electric power activities and construction of the electric power structures continued as well as monitoring of compliance with application of the requirements prescribed by the issued licenses. The natural gas sector in Republic of Srpska has not been sufficiently developed taking into account the capacities of the gas infrastructure and number of customers; and is concurrently burdened with numerous problems.
    [Show full text]
  • IN SITU MJERENJA GAMAFONA U OKOLINI TERMOE- LEKTRANA NA UGALJ NA PODRUČJU Bih
    HR9700033 IN SITU MJERENJA GAMAFONA U OKOLINI TERMOE- LEKTRANA NA UGALJ NA PODRUČJU BiH Anto MIHALJ, Davoriti SAMEK, Lejla SARAČEVIĆ Veterinarski fakultet Sarajevo, Zmaja od Bosne 134 UVOD Osnovu radijacijskog fona na zemlji danas sačinjavaju kosmičko i tere- sterijalno zračenje (radioaktivni elementi u zraku, vodi, zemlji i živom svijetu na njoj). Veličina radijacijskog fona zavisi od sadržaja radionuklida u tlu, vrste kosmičkog zračenja kao i geografskog područja na zemlji, te njegove nadmosrke visine. Posljednjih dvadesetak godina u svijetu se sve više primjenjuje gamaspektrometrijsko In Situ mjerenje gamafona (1,2,3), koje daje detaljne informacije o prisutnosti i koncentraciji radionuklida u zemlji kao i brzine ekspozicionih doza gama zračenja. Obzirom da nema konačnih saznanja o biološkim efektima dugotrajne ozračenosti niskim dozama koje potiču od vještačkih i prirodnih radionuklida, njihovo sistematsko istraživanje i mjerenje je od velike važnosti. Značaj ovih istraživanja naročito dolazi do izražaja kada se uzme u obzir da je visina radijacijskog fona u BiH nakon Ćernobiljskog akcidenta relativno slabo poznata. MATERIJAL I METODE Istraživanja su provedena tokom 1991.g. u okolini 4 termoelektrane na ugalj u BiH: Kakanj, Gacko, Tuzla i Ugljevik. Sve 4 termoelektrane locirane su u blizini naseljenih mijesta, a deponije pepela i šljake nalaze se u neposrednoj blizini termoelektrana. Deponije na lokalitetu Tuzla i Gacko predstavljaju vještačka jezera u koja se odlaže pepeo i šljaka potapanjem u vodu. Transport pepela I šljake obavlja se zatvorenim sistemom cjevovoda (Tuzla), prevozom kamionima-cisternama (Gacko) i transportom pokretnom trakom (Kakanj I Ugljevik). In Situ mjerenje gamafona i ukupna brzina ekspozicione doze gama zračenja vršena je na 4 točke svake od termoelektrana: u krugu termoelektrane, 3-5 km u smijeni i 3 -5 km suprotno od smijera ruže vjetrova te na deponiji pepela i šljake.
    [Show full text]
  • Detalji Poslovi\Og Subjekta
    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA REPUBLIKA SRPSKA okružni privredni sud u Bijeljini Datum: 3I.I0.A\l7.sodine DETALJI POSLOVI\OG SUBJEKTA U sudski registaľ, kod subjekta upisa ''INVEST NOVA'' AD Biijeljina, upisani su sljeđećipodaci: MBS: 1-4978 MB:01935321 JIB: 4400381240005 Caľinski broj: Firma: Društvo zauprav|janje investicionim fondovima ''INVEST NOVA'' AD Biijeljina Skľaćena oznaka ťtrme: ''INVEST NOVA'' AD Biijeljina Sjedište: Gavrila Pľincipa br. 11, Bijeljina' Bijeljina Status poslovnog subjekta: ľegistrovan osNIvAčI SUBJEKTA UPISA Pľezime i ime Adresa Dľagan Savić Srpske dobrovoljačke gaľde br c, Bijeljina, Bijeljina Svetozaľ Mihajlović Branka Radičevića br. , Bljeljina, Bijeljina Slavica Savić Kľalja Petra , Lopare, Lopare Svetozar Sladojević Dr V'D. Kecmnovića br. Banja Luka, Banja Luka Slavica Stević Pere Stanića b Bijeljina, Bijeljina Saša Vasiljević Simeuna Đaka , Banja Luka, Banja Luka Milan Viđić Kneza Miloša br. Doboj, Doboj Boris Vidović NikoleTęsle Vlasenica' Vlasenica Danilo Vujat Kozarskih ustaĺrika , Gradiška' Gradiška Bojan Maľković Karađoľđevabr Ugljevik, Ugljevik Dejan Markovió Karađoľđevabr. Ugljevik, Ugljevik Dragan Šohja Svetosavska , Foča, Foča Rajko Vuković Ložiona Trebinje, Trebinje Stranall4 Veljko Vasiljević Bogdana Zimonjićabr. Tľebinje, Trebinje obrad Batinić Vladimira Gačinovića br. ' Bilęća, Bileća Risto Ćeranić Tľg Vilijema Šekspiľabr. ,I|iďža, Sarajevo, Sarajevo Srboljub Golubović Save Mľkalja bľ' Banja Luka, Barrja Luka Jovo Gudelj Hercegovačk br'7,Trebinje,Trebinje Miro Klepió Cara Dušana br. Saľajevo, Saľajevo Miľjana Maksimović Filipa Višnjićabr. ,Bijeljina, Bijeljina RađmilaMićić. D.Baranjina br. , Bijeljina, Bijeljina Dragutin Mirović Kneza Miloša bľ' , Bijeljina, Bijeljina Veljko Papaz G.Kotorac , Istočna llidža, Istočnal|iđ Pętra Perić Kľalja Petra I br. l, Ugljevik, Ugljevik Radovan Vučković Stjepana Sjekoč 1 , Tľebinje, Trebinje Stevan Radić Braće Jugovićabr. Zvomlk, Zvoľni Vladimiľ Tľišić Lazę Kostića br.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Monthly Report
    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ministarstvo vanjske trgovine Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic i ekonomskih odnosa Relations Ured za veterinarstvo State Veterinary Office Bosne i Hercegovine of Bosnia and Herzegovina S A R A J E V O S A R A J E V O MONTHLY REPORT ON OCCURRENCE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Srpska Kostajnica Velika Kladuša Kozarska Dubica Bužim Gradiška Srpski Brod OdžakDomaljevac - Šamac Novi Grad Srbac Cazin Vukosavlje Šamac Orašje Prijedor Srpsko Orašje Krupa na Uni Derventa Modriča Bosanska Krupa Laktaši Pelagićevo Srpski Sanski Most Prnjavor Gradačac Brčko Town Doboj Brčko Sanski Most Bijeljina Bihać Banja Luka Čelinac Doboj IstokGračanica Usora Srebrenik Čelić Doboj Jug Ugljevik Lopare Bosanski Petrovac Tesanj Petrovo Ključ Teočak Teslić Lukavac Tuzla Kotor Varoš Maglaj Sapna Petrovac Kneževo Kalesija Ribnik Zvornik Srpski Drvar Živinice Mrkonjić Grad Dobretići Žepče Banovići Osmaci Drvar Zavidovići Jajce Jezero Šekovići Travnik Zenica Kladanj Šipovo Vlasenica Bratunac Bosansko Grahovo Donji Vakuf Kakanj Vareš Olovo Milici Glamoč Vitez Srebrenica Srspki Kupres Novi Travnik Busovača Han Pijesak Bugojno Visoko Breza Ilijaš Skelani Sokolac Fojnica Kiseljak Kupres Gornji Vakuf VogošćaStari Grad CentarSrpski Stari Grad Kreševo Novi Grad Livno Ilidža Rogatica Prozor Srpska Ilidža Pale Višegrad Hadžići Srpsko Trnovo Pale Tomislav Grad Srpsko Goražde Jablanica Trnovo Goražde Rudo Konjic Srpsko Trnovo Foča Čajniče Posušje North West Kalinovik Srbinje Srpski Mostar Široki Brijeg Grude Old
    [Show full text]