ITS 500 Series the New Alsaldobreda/Firema Meneghino Train for Milan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

ITS 500 Series the New Alsaldobreda/Firema Meneghino Train for Milan

Connectors ITS 500 ITS 500 Series Reverse Bayonet Single Pole Power Connector Introduction New York MTA The new AlsaldoBreda/Firema Glenair is proud to supply connectors and Meneghino train for Milan, Italy interconnect systems for various programs for the The Meneghino is a new six-car dual- New York MTA. voltage train for the Metropolitana Milanese Glenair interconnects are employed on critical (Milan underground). It belongs to the “MNG” Traction Motor System and Intercar Jumper (Metropolitana di Nuova Generazione or Metro applications on the M8 EMU Railcars supplied by New Generation) family.The MNG is designed and Kawasaki for Metro North Railroad. manufactured in cooperation with Ansaldo Breda, a premier Italian rail transport and engineering company. Each train is built with two identical traction units, in the “Rp-M-M” configuration: Each unit includes one trailer coach (Rp) equipped with a driver’s cab, and two intermediate motor coaches (M) without a driver’s cab. C The M8 is an electric multiple unit (EMU) railroad car built by Kawasaki for use on the New Haven Line of the Metro-North Railroad. Photo: office of Dannel Malloy Glenair has also supplied product for numerous applications on the Long Island Railroad / Metro North M9 cars such as Traction Motor Systems, Intercar Jumpers, Lighting, Communication, HVAC, Converters, as well as others. The new AlsaldoBreda/Firema Meneghino train for Milan, Italy The electrically - controlled passenger doors (8 on each coach) grant a high reliability standard and very low maintenance. The train is equipped with a highly advanced Passengers’ Audio/ Video Information System. With this system, passengers receive informational messages and video The EMU M9 railcars will replace the M-3 fleet and regarding train service, broadcast directly to LCD expand the electric fleet for East Side Access. monitors in each compartment. Glenair is a major contributor of connectors We continue to supply a wide array of and interconnect systems for this advanced connectors and conduit assemblies direct to NYCT metropolitan train. for various maintenance work being done on a number of their railcars from various projects. © 2011 Glenair, Inc. CAGE Code A6854 Rev. 07.16.18 Printed in U.S.A. GLENAIR, INC. • 1211 AIR WAY • GLENDALE, CA 91201-2497 • 818-247-6000 • FAX 818-500-9912 www.glenair.com - www.glenair.it C1 e-mail: [email protected].

Copy Link

Recommended publications

M7 Electric Multiple Unitанаnew York
Electric Multiple Unit -M- 7 POWERCAR WITH TOILET ---10' 6' B END FEND I 3,200 mi , -: -" 0 C==- ~=0 :- CJCJ ~~[] CJCJCJCJCJCJ [] I D b 01 " ~) -1::1 1211-1/2 t~J ~~W ~~IL...I ~w -A'-'1~~~- I ~~ 309~mmt ~ 1 I~ 11 m 2205~16~m-! 591..1.6" mm --I I 1- -- 59°6" ° 4°8-1/2. , ~ 16,~:,60~m ~-- -;cl 10435mm ~ .-1 25.908 mm F END GENERAL DATA wheelchair locations 2 type of vehicle electric multiple unit passenger per car (seated) under design operator Metropolitan Transportation Authority passengers per car (standing) crush load under design Long Island Railroad order date May 1999 TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS quantity 113 power cars without toilet .power fed by third rail: 400-900 Vdc 113 power cars with toilet .auxiliary voltages: 230 Vac / 3 ph / 60 Hz train consist up to 14 cars 72 Vdc .AC traction motor: 265 hp (200 kW) DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHf Metric Imperial .dynamic and pneumatic (tread & disc) braking system length over coupler 25,908 mm 85'0" .coil spring primary suspension width over side sheets 3,200 mm 10'6" .air-bag secondary suspension rail to roof height 3,950 mm 12' II Y;" .stainless steel carbody rail to top of floor height I ,295 mm 51" .fabricated steel frame trucks rail to top of height 4,039 mm 13' 3" .automatic parking brake doorway width 1,270 mm 50" .forced-air ventilation doorway height 1,981 mm 6'6" .air-conditioning capacity of 18 tons floor to high ceiling height 2,261 mm 89" .electric strip heaters floor to low ceiling height 2,007 mm 79" .ADA compliant toilet room (8 car) wheel diameter 914 mm 36" .vacuum sewage system
[Show full text]
Right of Passage
Right of Passage: Reducing Barriers to the Use of Public Transportation in the MTA Region Joshua L. Schank Transportation Planner April 2001 Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 · www.pcac.org ã PCAC 2001 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the following people: Beverly Dolinsky and Mike Doyle of the PCAC staff, who provided extensive direction, input, and much needed help in researching this paper. They also helped to read and re-read several drafts, helped me to flush out arguments, and contributed in countless other ways to the final product. Stephen Dobrow of the New York City Transit Riders Council for his ideas and editorial assistance. Kate Schmidt, formerly of the PCAC staff, for some preliminary research for this paper. Barbara Spencer of New York City Transit, Christopher Boylan of the MTA, Brian Coons of Metro-North, and Yannis Takos of the Long Island Rail Road for their aid in providing data and information. The Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee and its component Councils–the Metro-North Railroad Commuter Council, the Long Island Rail Road Commuters Council, and the New York City Transit Riders Council–are the legislatively mandated representatives of the ridership of MTA bus, subway, and commuter-rail services. Our 38 volunteer members are regular users of the MTA system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of County officials and, within New York City, of the Mayor, Public Advocate, and Borough Presidents. For more information on the PCAC and Councils, please visit our website: www.pcac.org.
[Show full text]
MTA Capital Program 2008–2013
MTA Capital Program 2008–2013 February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Overview: The MTA 2008-2013 Capital Program-- - i - “Building for the Future on a Firm Foundation” 2008-2013 Introduction: Investment Summary and Program Funding - 1 - I. Core CPRB Capital Program - 7 - MTA NYC Transit 2008-2013 Capital Program - 13 - Overview Program Plan MTA Long Island Rail Road 2008-2013 Capital Program - 45 - Overview Program Plan MTA Metro-North Railroad 2008-2013 Capital Program - 73 - Overview Program Plan MTA Bus Company 2008-2013 Capital Program - 101 - Overview Program Plan MTA Security 2008-2013 Capital Program - 111 - Overview Introduction MTA Interagency 2008-2013 Capital Program - 115 - Overview Program Plan II. Capacity Expansion - 123 - Completing the Current Expansion Projects: MTA Capital Construction Company: - 125 - Overview Program plan East Side Access Second Avenue Subway Fulton Street Transit Center South Ferry Terminal Regional Investments Miscellaneous 2005-2009 Capital Program New Capacity Expansion Investments - 141 - Overview Investments to Implement Congestion Pricing New Capacity Expansions to Support Regional Growth Communications Based Train Control Second Avenue Subway Next Phase Penn Station Access Jamaica Capacity Improvements #7 Fleet Expansion Capacity Planning Studies Sustainability Investments Program Project Listings (blue pages) - 149 - (not paginated; follows order above, beginning with blue pages for MTA NYC Transit and ending with blue pages for MTA Capital Construction Company) MTA Bridges and Tunnels 2008-2013 Capital Program - B-1 - Overview Program Plan Program Project Listings - B-25 - 2005-2009 Capital Program THE 2008-2013 CAPITAL PROGRAM: Building for the Future on a Firm Foundation In the early 1960’s, the New York Metropolitan Region’s mass transportation network faced financial collapse and a crisis of capacity.
[Show full text]
Drmnsmay-July2013
The Railyard Local Volume 12, Issue 3 -The Monthly Newsletter of the Danbury Railway Museum- May‐July 2013 DRM at GCT’s Grand In This Issue ~ Upcoming Events at DRM ‐ Page 2 Centennial Parade of Trains ~ Words from Our President ‐ Page 4 Huge crowds come to see famous and ~ Board of Directors News ‐ Page 5 historic railcars on display Plus . Ten Years Ago and New Members Danbury Railway Museum was honored to have five pieces of its rolling stock chosen to be dis‐ Burro Crane Revival played at Grand Central Terminal’s 100th anniversary Part 1 Introduction “Parade of Trains” the weekend of May 11th & 12th. The By Michael Madyda, Project Manager Metropolitan After itʹs arrival in October 1995, our 1947 Transportation Model 30 Burro crane CB3004 had sat unrestored and Authority hand‐picked inoperable. A couple of unsuccessful attempts had the Tonawanda Valley been made in the past to restore it. For those of you Pullman Co. observa‐ who remember, CB3004 came with a counterpart, tion car, the PRR Class CB3001, that was supposed to provide parts for the BNM‐70 Baggage/ restoration of CB3004. Several years ago, a decision Railway Post Office was made to scrap CB3001 when the yard was being car, the 1171 ACMU, cleaned up. Unfortunately, vital parts from CB3004 the NYC 2013 EMD that were removed, but not replaced, for its restoration FL‐9 diesel electric were lost or scrapped during that time. locomotive, and the CDOT 605 ALCO RS‐ A sign welcomes visitors. 3m diesel to be trans‐ Top photo: Carolyn Taylor ported and displayed Bottom photo: Bob Boothe at the event.
[Show full text]
April 2018 Amendment CPRB
SubmittedInterior_April2018_CapProg_Ex SummFEB_2018 4/23/18 12:16 PM Page 1 MTA Capital Program 2015–2019 Renew. Enhance. Expand. CAPITAL PROGRAM Amendment No. 3 mta.info/capital As Submitted to the Capital Program Review Board April 2018 1 18 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Overview……………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 Program Evolution and Proposed Changes ……………………..………………………………………………..………..…………….… 24 Investment Summary……………………………………………………………………..………..……………………………….………………… 25 Program Funding……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………..…… 26 MTA Core……………………………………….……………………………………………….……………………………………………... 29 MTA New York City Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… 29 MTA Long Island Rail Road………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 49 MTA Metro-North Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 63 MTA Bus Company……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 75 MTA Interagency…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 79 MTA Network Expansion……………………………………………………………….………………………..……………………….. 85 MTA Bridges and Tunnels……………………………………………………….………………………………………………...…….. 97 Project Listings………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………………...……… 107 MTA New York City Transit…………………....…………………………………….……………………………………………………………………….. 111 MTA Long Island Rail Road……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………… 135 MTA Metro-North Railroad……………………………………………………………………………………………..……..….….….….….…… 143 MTA Bus Company…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………….….….
[Show full text]
Best Practices and Strategies for Improving Rail Energy Efficiency
U.S. Department of Transportation Best Practices and Strategies for Federal Railroad Improving Rail Energy Efficiency Administration Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 DOT/FRA/ORD-14/02 Final Report January 2014 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Government, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. The United States Government assumes no liability for the content or use of the material contained in this document. NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
[Show full text]
Network Rail Infrastructure Limited – Annual Return 2011 3 MB
Network Rail Annual Return 2011 “More trains would take the pressure off at busy times. They nearly all seem to be crowded.” The railways have never been more popular. The result is that we need more capacity. More trains. Longer trains. We spent £1.7bn in the year on capacity enhancements and plan to invest £12bn over the five years to 2014 *Passenger comment, December 2010 Helping Britain run better Contents 1 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 11 Section 1 – Operational performance and stakeholder relationships 25 Section 2 – Network capability and network availability 37 Section 3 – Asset management 75 Section 4 – Activity volumes 89 Section 5 – Safety and environment 98 Section 6 – Enhancement Programme “Projects designed to increase capacity and improve services range from the new Airdrie-Bathgate rail link in Scotland to Thameslink across London, from platform lengthening on the East Coast to the redevelopment of Reading and entirely new stations such as Newport.” Contents Executive Summary 1 Track failures 50 Overall performance in 2010/11 1 Condition of asset temporary speed restriction sites (M4) 51 Operational performance and stakeholder relationships 2 Track geometry faults (M5) 54 Network capability and network availability 3 Earthwork failures (M6) 57 Asset management 4 Earthwork condition (M33) 58 Safety and environment 5 Tunnel condition 59 Expenditure and efficiency 6 Bridge condition (M8) 61 Enhancements schemes 7 Signalling failures (M9) 64 Signalling asset condition (M10) 64 Introduction 8 Alternating current traction
[Show full text]
Metro-North Scenario Pack 01
Realistic Routes and Scenarios for Train Simulator Metro-North Scenario Pack 01 About High Iron Simulations As a Train Simulator Partner Programme member, we collaborate with Dovetail Games to produce a wide variety of realistic content for Train Simulator. Our products now include more than 25 realistic Train Simulator scenario packs, each of which is available at the Steam Store and Dovetail Games Store. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Metro-North Commuter Railroad is one of the United States largest commuter operations, with daily ridership of approximately 300,000 passengers and annual ridership in excess of 87 million. Operating as an entity of New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Metro-North operates three commuter lines from New York City’s Grand Central Terminal — the Hudson Line extending, via Croton-Harmon, to Poughkeepsie, New York; the Harlem Line extending, via White Plains and Brewster, to Wassaic, New York; and the New Haven Line, extending via Stamford, to New Haven, Connecticut. The New Haven Line, operated in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, includes branch lines to New Canaan, Danbury, and Waterbury, Connecticut. Metro-North also is a partner with NJ Transit in operating “West of Hudson” lines from Hoboken (New Jersey) Terminal to Spring Valley and Port Jervis, New York. To serve its three routes from Grand Central Terminal, Metro-North utilizes electric-multiple-unit (EMU) trains as well as diesel powered trains hauling Shoreliner “push-pull” equipment. Most diesel-powered trains utilize General Electric P32AC-DM locomotives. EMU trains on the Hudson and Harlem lines most typically employ Metro-North’s M7A electrics while the New Haven Line employs M8 EMUs, the latter of which are equipped to operate both from third-rail D.
[Show full text]
180-Day Response
December 9, 2020 Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo Honorable Thomas P. DiNapoli Governor of New York State Office of the State Comptroller NYS State Capitol Building 59 Maiden Lane, 31st Floor Albany, NY 12224 New York, NY 10038 RE: Response to Final Report #2018-S-18– Selected Performance Measures Gentlemen: On January 6, 2020, the Office of the State Comptroller issued the above referenced audit report. As required by Section 170 of the Executive Law, I am providing you with the attached response which addresses the recommendations contained in the report. Additionally, I will be working with staff to ensure that management is following up on and enforcing the audit’s recommendations, where appropriate, and requesting regular, interim reports to that effect. A copy of the final audit report is attached for your convenience. Sincerely, Patrick J. Foye Chairman and Chief Executive Officer c: Anni Zhu, Chief of Staff to the MTA Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Michele Woods, Auditor General, MTA Audit Services Attachment Jamaica Station Phillip Eng Jamaica, NY 11435-4380 President 718 558-8254 Tel 71 8 657-9047 Fax e Long Island Rail Road November 20, 2020 Mr. Patrick Foye Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Metropolitan Transportation Authority 2 Broadway New York, NY 10004 RE: MTA Long Island Rail Road Performance Measures Report 2018-S-18 Dear Chairman Foye: I am responding on behalf of the Long Island Railroad (LIRR) to the above-referenced report in compliance with Section 170 of the Executive Law. As described in our 30-day response dated November 7, 2019, and again in this letter, the LIRR already has made significant progress implementing the six recommendations contained in the report.
[Show full text]
The Vision of Montreal's Downtown at the Core of a Polycentric City And
Page 1 Montreal, November 3, 2016 Anton Dubrau The Vision of Montreal’s Downtown at the Core of a PolyCentric City And How to Get there With Public Transit A Contribution to the Office de la Consultation Publique de Montreal on the “Strategie CentreVille”. Page 2 1. Intro 4 2. What is a PolyCentral City? 4 3. A Transit System for a PolyCentric City: An SBahn 6 4. What would an SBahn look like in Montreal? 10 5. The REM The NorthSouth SBahn? 15 5.1. Intro 15 5.2. Low Capacity 17 5.4. Monopolization of Mount Royal Tunnel 20 5.4.1. A Second Tunnel? 25 5.4.2. A Solution: Shared System of REM, AMT, VIA 26 5.5. Bad Transfers At Gare Centrale 29 5.5.1. REM ⟷ Orange Line 29 5.5.2. Improving the transfer REM ⟷ Orange Line 30 5.5.3. Further Improving the transfer Moving a Metro Station 31 5.5.4. REM ⟷ ReneveLevesque 32 5.7. REM: bypassing Griffintown, the Old Port, PtStCharles 35 5.8. Summary 35 5.9. Ridership 35 5.10. An Alternative: CN Rail Viaduct 36 5.11. A Note on Cost 40 6. Summary 41 7. APPENDICES 42 7.1. APPENDIX A: Description of a Shared System between AMT, VIA & REM 42 7.1.1. Frequency, Dwell times & Schedule 42 7.1.2. Track Layout and Station 47 7.1.3. The McGill Station 47 7.1.4. Signalling system / automation 48 7.1.5.
[Show full text]
WATERBURY and NEW CANAAN BRANCH LINES NEEDS and FEASIBILITY STUDY Project 170-2562
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Policy and Planning Intermodal Planning WATERBURY AND NEW CANAAN BRANCH LINES NEEDS AND FEASIBILITY STUDY Project 170-2562 Phases I and II Waterbury and New Canaan Branches Innovative Technologies Report Date: April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i 1.0 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Innovative Technologies ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Rail Vehicles .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Waterbury Branch ................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 New Canaan Branch............................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Track and Grade Crossings .................................................................................. 2-3 2.2.1 Track Design........................................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 Grade Crossings ..................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Train Control .......................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3.1 Block Signaling ......................................................................................
[Show full text]
New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis
CTrail Strategies New Haven Line Capacity and Speed Analysis Final Report June 2021 | Page of 30 CTrail Strategies Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Conditions: Infrastructure, Facilities, Equipment and Services (Task 1)............... 2 2.1. Capacity and Speed are Constrained by Legacy Infrastructure .................................... 3 2.2. Track Geometry and Slow Orders Contribute to Reduced Speeds ............................... 4 2.3. State-of-Good-Repair & Normal Replacement Improvements Impact Speed .............. 6 2.4. Aging Diesel-Hauled Fleet Limits Capacity ..................................................................... 6 2.5. Service Can Be Optimized to Improve Trip Times .......................................................... 7 2.6. Operating Costs and Revenue ........................................................................................ 8 3. Capacity of the NHL (Task 2)................................................................................................. 8 4. Market Assessment (Task 3) ............................................................................................... 10 4.1. Model Selection and High-Level Validation................................................................... 10 4.2. Market Analysis..............................................................................................................
[Show full text]