DOCSLIB.ORG

Signature Redacted Signature of Author: History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology Affd Society August 19, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Signature Redacted Signature of Author: History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology Affd Society August 19, 2014 Project Apollo, Cold War Diplomacy and the American Framing of Global Interdependence by MASSACHUSETTS 5NS E. OF TECHNOLOGY OCT 0 6 201 Teasel Muir-Harmony LIBRARIES Bachelor of Arts St. John's College, 2004 Master of Arts University of Notre Dame, 2009 Submitted to the Program in Science, Technology, and Society In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2014 D 2014 Teasel Muir-Harmony. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature redacted Signature of Author: History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology affd Society August 19, 2014 Certified by: Signature redacted David A. Mindell Frances and David Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Committee Chair redacted Certified by: Signature David Kaiser C01?shausen Professor of the History of Science Director, Program in Science, Technology, and Society Senior Lecturer, Department of Physics Committee Member Signature redacted Certified by: Rosalind Williams Bern Dibner Professor of the History of Technology Committee Member Accepted by: Signature redacted Heather Paxson William R. Kenan, Jr. Professor, Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies, History, Anthropology, and STS Signature redacted Accepted by: David Kaiser Germeshausen 14Dfssor of the History of Science, STS Director, Program in Science, Technology, and Society Senior Lecturer, Department of Physics Project Apollo, Cold War Diplomacy and the American Framing of Global Interdependence by Teasel Muir-Harmony Submitted to the Program in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society on August 19, 2014 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the distinctive and critical role that space exploration played in American foreign relations and national image making in the 1960s. Proposed by President John F. Kennedy in 1961, Project Apollo was established, in large part, as a means of demonstrating American power and promoting technocratic values in an international landscape defined by the Cold War, the collapse of colonialism, and the emergence of newly independent nations. While existing scholarship has gestured to this geopolitical context, it has tended to examine activity that takes place on American or lunar soil. This dissertation argues that the geopolitical context was not simply a backdrop but instead the main theater of Project Apollo. By embedding this familiar story back in its global context, this dissertation reinterprets the established narrative of Project Apollo in three significant ways. First, it places greater emphasis on the international stage and the relationship between the US and the world. Second, while the role of the Executive Branch remains essential to this story, this dissertation shifts the focus from engineers and managers, to key actors within the State Department and United States Information Agency, as well as foreign leaders and the world public. Finally, the role of Project Apollo in foreign relations, and public diplomacy in particular, becomes the defining feature of this investigation. By examining how US government elites promoted and disseminated information about space exploration to support American foreign relations interests, this dissertation offers a lens onto attempts to establish national power by fusing perceived values and strengths of science and technology- like rationality and progress- with the image of the nation's political system. These efforts, this dissertation demonstrates, were not only aimed at boosting American prestige, but were also strategic attempts to promote an idea of global unity and progress ushered in by American scientific and technological leadership. Thesis Supervisor: David Mindell Title: Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am fortunate enough to be indebted to countless friends, colleagues and acquaintances that supported, challenged and guided me at every stage of this process. First, I want thank the participants in Project Apollo public diplomacy who shared their time and recollections with me: Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong, Frank Borman, Simon Bourgin, Ken Bryson, Conan Grames, Beverly Gray, Fred Haise, James Lovell Jr., Jack Masey & Beverly Payeff-Masey, Harrison Schmitt, and David Scott. The conversations we had gave me an invaluable window onto a world I eagerly wanted to understand. I am grateful for my encouraging and optimistic committee. My advisor, David Mindell, supported this project, and me, throughout my time at MIT. He has continually challenged me to look more closely, dig more deeply and ask more questions--for this I am profoundly appreciative. Rosalind Williams has been a generous and remarkable mentor; this project has benefited immeasurably from her insights about the impact of technology on human experience. I thank David Kaiser for his graciousness, perceptive comments and encouragement. Although Leo Marx was not on my committee his influence, I hope, can be detected in these pages. I feel privileged and grateful to have been one of Leo's students. I thankful to have worked with, and been mentored by, many other MIT faculty. I want to specifically express my gratitude to David Jones, Michael Fischer, Stefan Heimreich, Anne McCants, Heather Paxson, Hanna Rose Shell, Merritt Roe Smith, and Larry Young. I want to also thank Karen Gardner whose kindness, humor and support I relied on, and appreciated, every day. The HASTS student body and STS postdocs have been wonderful friends and colleagues. I would especially like to thank Marie Burks, Edoh Amah, Nate Deshmukh Towery, Xaq Frolich, Chihyung Jeon, Shreeharsh Kelkar, Yanni Loukissas, Ryan Shapiro, Shekhar Krishnan, Zara Mirmalek, Canay Ozden-Schilling, Rebecca Perry, Sophia Roosth, Michael Rossi, Caterina Scaramelli, Shira Shmuely, David Singerman, Alma Steingart, Mitali Thakor, Michaela Thompson, John Tylko, Emily Wanderer, and Rebecca Woods. I am particularly grateful for the friendship and support of Lisa Messeri, Tom Ozden- Schilling, Ellan Spero, and Ben Wilson. In 20111 was fortunate to be an exchange scholar in the Division of History of Science, Technology and Environment at the Royal Institute of Technology. I thank my friends and colleagues at KTH and the University of Gothenburg for their hospitality, thoughtful questions and guidance during the early stages of this project. In particular I wish to recognize Anna Aberg, Dag Avango, Mats Fridlund, Sabine H6hler, Anders Houltz, Arne Kaijser, Christopher Kullenberg, Jesper Meijling, Adam Netz6n, Sverker S~rlin, and Helena T6rnkvist. I also wish to acknowledge Steven & Ingrid Gilsdorf, Susanne Grund, and Jenny Olsson, who made me feel at home in Stockholm. 5 I was fortunate to receive fellowships and scholarly homes at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum (NASM) and the Philadelphia Area Center for the History of Science (PACHS). Martin Collins has been a thoughtful and charitable mentor for the past ten years. I was grateful for the opportunity to work more closely with him at NASM as a Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Fellow. I wish to thank the many members of the Smithsonian community that have nurtured my project from its inception. I would especially like to thank Chandra Bhimull, Paul Ceruzzi, Pete Daniel, James David, Mychalene Giampaoli, Hunter Hollins, Maureen Kerr, Monique Laney, Roger Launius, Jennifer Levasseur, Cathleen Lewis, Jo Ann Morgan, Valerie Neal, Allan Needell, Michael Neufeld, Anke Ortlepp, Richard Paul, Jim Thomas, Steve Velasquez, Deborah Warner, Margaret Weitekamp, Collette Wiliams, and Beth Wilson. My year at PACHS gave me time to write and a community that challenged me to engage more deeply with the history of science and technology. I wish to thank the many friends and colleagues I gained in Philadelphia. In particular I would like to acknowledge Simon Joseph, Julia Mansfield, Rebecca Onion, Sheila O'Shaughnessy, and especially Babak Ashrafi. The seeds of this project were planted during my graduate studies at the University of Notre Dame and my various positions at the Adler Planetarium and Astronomy Museum. I am indebted to Don Howard, Marc Rodriguez, John Soares, and Tom Stapleford. I am grateful for the opportunity to have been a part of the Adler Webster Institute. I thank my remarkable colleagues Lauren Boegen, Jennifer Brand, Misty DeMars, Sara Gonzales, Jodi Lacy, Jill Postma, and Bruce Stephenson. Mary Bolt deserves special recognition for his continued support and inspiring passion for the history of astronomy. Much of the material in this dissertation had its first run in conference presentations and benefited immeasurably from the thoughtful insights from colleagues. In particular I wish to thank Laura Belmonte, Nicolas Cull, Brian Etheridge, Hallvard Notaker, Kendrick Oliver, Giles Scott-Smith, Asif Siddiqi, and David Snyder for their comments. Throughout this project I have relied on the guidance of many archivists; I am grateful for their time and expertise. I wish to thank the remarkably helpful archivists and librarians
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction The Georgia Historical Society is excited to offer “And That’s the Way It Is: Television and the Cold War” inquiry kit. This inquiry-based resource includes activities designed to meet the Georgia Standards of Excellence for fifth grade U.S. history. Based on the Inquiry Design Model from C3 Teachers, this resource explores primary sources and utilizes relevant strategies to investigate the Cold War era of the late 20th Century in Georgia and the United States by focusing on the rise of mass media and its relationship to the Cold War including events such as the Vietnam War, the Space Race, and the Civil Rights Movement. The contents of the Inquiry Kit are a series of inquiry-based strategies and activities designed to help teachers guide students to explore a curated set of primary sources. The inquiry format is based on the Inquiry Design Model (IDM) from the C3 Framework for the Social Studies. The inquiry element emphasized in the C3 Framework is centered on asking a compelling question. Compelling questions are meant to address issues found across the social studies disciplines. They engage students by evoking their interests and highlighting the content with which students might have little experience. For example, the compelling question in the “And That’s the Way It Is: Television and the Cold War” inquiry kit “How was the Cold War shaped by television?” The compelling question is open-ended and is meant to engage students in critical thinking and creativity. It challenges students to examine the focus-of-study, the Cold War, through a multi-disciplinary lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronauts Mark Anniversary of Apollo 13 Drama 13 April 2010, by MICHAEL TARM , Associated Press Writer
    Astronauts mark anniversary of Apollo 13 drama 13 April 2010, By MICHAEL TARM , Associated Press Writer On April 13, 1970, an oxygen tank exploded as the spaceship was four-fifths of the way to the moon. The crew, which included Jack Swigert, who died in 1982, was forced to scrap the moon mission and focus solely on getting back to Earth alive. Lovell's calm if unsettling words to Mission Control following the explosion that, "Houston, we've had a problem" - now widely recited as, "Houston, we have a problem" - belied his quick internal calculation that their chances of survival were slim. Apollo 13 crew member Commander James A. Lovell, "But you don't put that in your mind," he said Jr. poses with his space suit during a 40th Anniversary Monday. "You don't say how slim they are but reunion of the moon mission at the Adler Planetarium rather how you can improve the odds." Monday, April 12, 2010, in Chicago. (AP Photo/Paul Beaty) In Houston, Kranz led hundreds of flight controllers and engineers in a furious rescue plan. He insisted on Monday that he never allowed himself to believe that the plan could fail. (AP) -- Surviving Apollo 13 astronauts and several flight directors reunited on Monday to remember a Still, he quickly added, "there is some point when failed moon mission 40 years ago this week that you do the best you can and then it's up to a higher they managed to turn into one of the greatest authority to steer this mission to its ultimate triumphs in the history of space exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Information Series
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project Information Series EUGENE KOPP Interviewed by: Tom Tuch Initial interview date: March 7, 1988 Copyright 1998 A ST TABLE OF CONTENTS Coming to USIA Promotion to USIA Assistant Director Administration Sha espeare!s operating policies Policy Differences Strains between USIA and Dept of State Vis a Vis Soviet Union/D'tente Distrust of Foreign Service USIA (eographic Offices Subordinated to Media Offices USIA Deputy Director Corrects policies (eneral Counsel (ordon Strachan a problem Confronting Keogh!s explaining Keogh!s accomplishments Agency difficulties, -atergate VOA director Ken (iddens and Keogh Differences Special Concern .etrospective View Disagreement on Policy between USIA Management and VOA INTERVIEW ": This is Tom Tuch interviewing Eugene Kopp, former Deputy Director of USIA in his office in downtown (ashington, today on March 7, 1988. KOPP/ Tom. 1 ": Nice to see you. KOPP/ Than you very much. Coming to USIA ": Let,s start by tal-ing about your coming into a foreign affairs agency, USIA, from life as a lawyer, during the Ni.on Administration. How did you decide that you wanted to wor- in USIA as a political appointee at that time0 KOPP/ -ell1 let me bac up Tom/ After I got out of law school in 1341 I served a year as law cler for a federal judge1 I then went to the Department of 5ustice in 1342 as a trial attorney. And by 1348 I felt that I probably ought to be thin ing about something else to do because I didn8t thin I wanted to say at 5ustice for a full career.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacecraft Solar Cell Arrays
    NASA NASA SP-8074 SPACE VEHICLE DESIGN CRITERIA (GUIDANCE AND CONTROL) SPACECRAFT SOLAR CELL ARRAYS MAY 1971 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION c GUIDE TO THE USE OF THIS MONOGRAPH The purpose of this monograph is to organize and present, for effective use in design, the signifi- cant experience and knowledge accumulated in operational programs to date. It reviews and assesses current state-of-the-art design practices, and from them establishes firm guidance for achieving greater consistency in design, increased reliability in the end product, and greater efficiency in the design effort for conventional missions. The monograph is organized into three major sections that are preceded by a brief introduction and complemented by a set of references. The State of the Art, Section 2, reviews and discusses the total design problem, and identifies which1 design elements are involved in successful design. It describes succinctly the current tech- nology pertaining to these elements. When detailed information is required, the best available references are cited. This section serves as a survey of the subject that provides background material and prepares a proper technological base for the Design Criteria and Recommended Practices. The Design Criteria, shown in Section 3, state clearly and briefly what rule, guide, limitation, or standard must be considered for each essential design element to ensure successful design. The Design Criteria can serve effectively as a checklist of rules for the project manager to use in guiding a design or in assessing its adequacy. The Recommended Practices, as shown in Section 4, state how to satisfy each of the criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Norderney Kurier 13.12.2013
    Wochenzeitung für die Insel Norderney enlos mer freitags: kost Im ungen 5. Jahrgang / nummer 50 an alle Haushalt freitag, 13. dezember 2013 Wilhelmstraße 2, 26548 norderney HocHwasser EP: und läuft te: morgen: 1 Uhr ➠ Heu ➠ 13. Dezember: 7.50 Uhr 20.3 21.26 Uhr ter 14. Dezember: 8.54 Uhr t der enno’S inSel-geläS 16 Uhr der stadtrat hat sich nochmals mi 15. Dezember: 9.49 Uhr 22. g von Wohnraum enno ist verschnupft, er ist wirk- nachhaltigen sicherun vice ➟ Seite 2 lich krank. doch zu hause ist ser r insulaner befasst. port Seiten 3, 4 und 5 fü tens sicher... lokales/s ➟ er wenigs s/events ➟ Seite 6 ticket Wünsch Dir... eine Geschenkidee, neu sV Werder verabschiedet sich die immer passt! norderney Kurier jetzt auch online AbsAge fußball-bundesligist bereitet sich nur noch im zillertal auf die Saison vor Jann-Berghaus-Straße 78 • Tel.: 4 12 die bremer hatten ansteuern, stand schon vor kontakt zwölfmal auf Norderney dem Bayern-Debakel fest. „Wir haben davon vor einigen GescHäftsstelle ihr trainingslager Tagen erfahren“, teilte sven norderney04932/86969-0 absolviert. die Suche Frese als Pressesprecher von Geöffnet: veranstalter Rudolf König (Kö- mo. - fr.: 9 - 16.30 UHr nach einem Nachfolger nig event Marketing) mit. sa.: 9.30 - 12.00 UHr läuft auf vollen touren. 2002 lockte König die Bre- kUndenservice 8 69 69-10 mer, die damals schon von von ingo janssen anZeiGen 8 69 69-10 Thomas schaaf trainiert wur- redaktion 8 69 69-14 den, erstmals auf seine Hei- norderney/Bremen – als matinsel, auf der zuvor bereits fax 8 69 69-20 der Tross des sv Werder Bre- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conley, James D
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project JAMES D. CONLEY Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: January 27, 2000 Copyright 2018 ADST [Note: This interview was not edited by Mr. Conley prior to his death.] Q: Today is the 27th of January, 2000. This is an interview with James D. Conley, being done on behalf of the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, and I am Charles Stuart Kennedy. Jim and I are old friends, having served together back in the sixties in Belgrade. Jim, could you tell me when and where you were born and something about your family? CONLEY: I was born in Chicago, Illinois on October 5, 1928. My family were native Chicagoans. I have three brothers and a sister. We grew up on the north side of Chicago. I attended parochial schools, St. George High School in Evanston. It was a very happy time in my life. Q: What was your father’s background? CONLEY: My father served in the First World War. He did not attend college. He had a great ability with figures. He was one of the youngest commissioned officers in the First World War. In fact, he was commissioned on his birthday. He couldn’t have been younger than that, because he was like the administrative officer of the battalion that he was with. When he came out of the army he wound up as the inside man of a small insurance brokerage agency in Chicago, which later became substantial. He did that the rest of his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M
    Chapter Two Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M. Logsdon Project Apollo, the remarkable U.S. space effort that sent 12 astronauts to the surface of Earth’s Moon between July 1969 and December 1972, has been extensively chronicled and analyzed.1 This essay will not attempt to add to this extensive body of literature. Its ambition is much more modest: to provide a coherent narrative within which to place the various documents included in this compendium. In this narrative, key decisions along the path to the Moon will be given particular attention. 1. Roger Launius, in his essay “Interpreting the Moon Landings: Project Apollo and the Historians,” History and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3 (September 2006): 225–55, has provided a com­ prehensive and thoughtful overview of many of the books written about Apollo. The bibliography accompanying this essay includes almost every book-length study of Apollo and also lists a number of articles and essays interpreting the feat. Among the books Launius singles out for particular attention are: John M. Logsdon, The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970); Walter A. McDougall, . the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age (New York: Basic Books, 1985); Vernon Van Dyke, Pride and Power: the Rationale of the Space Program (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1964); W. Henry Lambright, Powering Apollo: James E. Webb of NASA (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995); Roger E. Bilstein, Stages to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles, NASA SP-4206 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1980); Edgar M.
    [Show full text]
  • Beretning 1952
    BERETNING 19S2 DET NORSKE ARBEIDERPARTI DET ORSKE ARBEIDERPARTI BERETNING 1952 UTARBEIDET VED PARTIKONTORET OSLO 1953 ARBEIDER ES AKTIETRYKKERI . , INNHOLD Side Innledning ......................................... 5 Sentralstyret og landstyret ......................... 6 Sentralstyremøter .................................. 7 Landstyrets møter . ............................... 7 Konferanser og fellesmØter ......................... 10 Olav Kringen ...................................... 11 Faste komiteer og utvalg ........................... 11 Sentralstyrets representanter i diverse institusjoner .. 13 Utvalg i forbindelse med forberedelsen til landsmØtet 14 1. mai ............................................. 16 Johan Nygaardsvolds minnefond .................... 27 Organisasjonsarbeid ................................ 27 Saker sendt ut av partikontoret ..................... 32- Tillitsmannen ...................................... 33 Magnetofoner ...................................... 34 Stipendier ......................................... 3:5 Prisloven ........................................... 34 Distriktsorganisasjonenes' rapporter .................• 35 Internasjonalt samarbeid ........................... 72 Nordisk samarbeid ................................. 72 Partikurs .......................................... 73 Partikontoret ....................................... 73 Kvinnebevegelsen .................................. 74 A.U.F ............................................... 81 Framfylkingen ............•........................
    [Show full text]
  • Closingin.Pdf
    4: . —: : b Closing In: Marines in the Seizure of Iwo Jima by Colonel Joseph H. Alexander, USMC (Ret) unday, 4 March 1945,sion had finally captured Hill 382,infiltrators. The Sunday morning at- marked the end of theending its long exposure in "The Am-tacks lacked coordination, reflecting second week ofthe phitheater;' but combat efficiencythe division's collective exhaustion. U.S. invasion of Iwohad fallen to 50 percent. It wouldMost rifle companies were at half- Jima. By thispointdrop another five points by nightfall. strength. The net gain for the day, the the assault elements of the 3d, 4th,On this day the 24th Marines, sup-division reported, was "practically and 5th Marine Divisions were ex-ported by flame tanks, advanced anil." hausted,their combat efficiencytotalof 100 yards,pausingto But the battle was beginning to reduced to dangerously low levels.detonate more than a ton of explo-take its toll on the Japanese garrison The thrilling sight of the Americansives against enemy cave positions inaswell.GeneralTadamichi flag being raised by the 28th Marinesthat sector. The 23d and 25th Ma-Kuribayashi knew his 109th Division on Mount Suribachi had occurred 10rines entered the most difficult ter-had inflicted heavy casualties on the days earlier, a lifetime on "Sulphurrain yet encountered, broken groundattacking Marines, yet his own loss- Island." The landing forces of the Vthat limited visibility to only a fewes had been comparable.The Ameri- Amphibious Corps (VAC) had al-feet. can capture of the key hills in the ready sustained 13,000 casualties, in- Along the western flank, the 5thmain defense sector the day before cluding 3,000 dead.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rae Table of Earth Satellites 1957-1986 the Rae Table Ofearth Satellites
    THE RAE TABLE OF EARTH SATELLITES 1957-1986 THE RAE TABLE OFEARTH SATELLITES 1957-1986 compiled at The Royal Aircraft Establishment, Famborough, Hants, England by D.G. King-Dele, FRS, D.M.C. Walker, PhD, J.A. Pilkington, BSc, A.N. Winterbottom, H. Hiller, BSc and G.E. Perry, MBE The Table is a chronological list of the 2869 launches of satellites and space vehicles between 1957 and the end of 1986, giving the name and international designation of each satellite and its associated rocket(s), with the date of launch, lifetime (actual or estimated), mass, shape, dimensions and at least one set of orbital parameters. Other fragments associated with a launch, and space vehicles that escape from the Earth's influence, are given without details. Including fragments, more than 17000 satellites appear in the 893 pages of the tabulation, and there is a full Index. M TOCKTON S P R E S S © Crown copyright 1981, 1983, 1987 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 3rd edition 1987 978-0-333-39275-1 Published by permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Published in the United States and Canada by STOCKTON PRESS, 1987 15 East 26th Street, New York, N.Y. 10010 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The R.A.E. table of earth satellites, 1957-1986. Rev. ed. of: The RAE table of earth satellites, 1957- 1980. 2nd ed. 1981. 1. Artificial satellites- Registers.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo 13'S Harrowing Journey
    JIM LOV The famous astronaut recounts Apollo 13 — the mission that almost didn’t make it home. BY RICHARD TALCOTT TO THE AVERAGE AMERICAN living in 1970, the space program had become rather humdrum. The previ- ous year had witnessed Apollo 11’s historic first Moon landing and Apollo 12’s precision touchdown within walking distance of the unmanned Surveyor 3 spacecraft. But by early 1970, NASA’s run of success had turned much of the nation complacent. Many wondered whether fixing problems on Earth demanded more attention than exploring the Moon. It was in this climate that Apollo 13 set off on April 11 for the third lunar landing. The mission was to be the first devoted largely to sci- ence, and targeted an area near Fra Mauro Crater that scientists thought had been splattered by debris from the impact that formed Mare Imbrium. Jim Lovell served as Apollo 13’s commander. This was his fourth trip into space. He had previously teamed with Frank Borman on Gemini VII The Saturn V rocket that sent Apollo 13 on its in December 1965, when they way to the Moon ignites achieved the first rendezvous with its engines on the afternoon of April 11, another manned spacecraft; with 1970. ALL PHOTOS BY NASA UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED Buzz Aldrin on Gemini XII in November 1966, that program’s final mission; and with Borman and 18 ASTRONOMY • APRIL 2020 ELL REMEMBERS Triumph over tragedy Bill Anders on the historic Apollo 8 mission in December 1968 that first sent astronauts to the Moon. On Apollo 13, he was joined by a pair of rookies: Command Module Pilot Jack Swigert and Lunar Module Pilot Fred Haise.
    [Show full text]