Export of Corrosion: How Practices from Russia Penetrate and Undermine US and UK Prepared for a panel discussion “Export of Russian Corruption: From Kremlin with Hate” at the annual Convention of The Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES), Boston, November 21-24, 2013 Ilya Zaslavskiy –
[email protected] November 16, 2013 Executive summary • Since Cold War US and UK governments chose to oppose Russia only on traditional hardcore criminal issues (arms control, espionage, outright crime, etc.) but neglect highly questionable and ethically debatable practices and appease Kremlin in exchange for nuclear proliferation and select regional cooperation issues (e.g. Iran, Korea, Afghanistan, arguably Syria). • Below is a detailed analytical update on 6 hardcore and 13 highly questionable/debatable layers of export of corrosive practices from Russia based on a thorough overview of data since Putin’s grab of power in 2000. • The main argument of the report is that neglected layers of corrosion, although less harmful at a first glance, are nevertheless extremely dangerous in the long run as they undermine democratic values, institutions and practices in US and UK and can undermine national security by importing Russian practices to the West. • New forms of corrosion export often come without direct support of Russian state but through corporations or powerful individuals connected to Putin’s regime. 1 • US and UK governments, media and opinion-makers should be bolder in filtering and counter- acting penetration of Russian corrosive practices in international organizations, internet, western media, legal and financial system, elections, lobbying, think-tanks, universities, real estate. While the exact terming of this new containment/filtering and its extent requires more research and public discussion, this report tries to synthetize most basic and initial policy suggestions for each layer in one summary table at the end.