DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL TOLERANCE AND SOCIAL POLICY: A CASE STUDY OF CRIME AND PENAL PRACTICES IN THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD IN UKRAINE. MYKOLA B. PANASYUK LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION MAY 2000 UMI Number: U137986 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U137986 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 /(4£St£ f 78 S 7 75 *+7z<5 2 V Abstract The present study focuses on the current state and developments of social and penal policies in Ukraine. It concentrates on changes brought about in the period of social and political transition, which started when Ukraine became an independent state in 1991. In particular, this study attempts to explain the current failure of reforms as being the result of a lack of social tolerance intrinsic to state officials at all levels, a legacy of previous repressive regimes. The introduction examines the notion of tolerance as a value produced by civil society and its importance for the administration of penal policy. It is argued that the level of social tolerance is heavily influenced by the nature of social and economic relationships. The following section consists of a case study presenting the origins of Ukrainian political, economic and social institutions and the results of an analysis of official media reportage of the current transition towards a market economy - a transition which has formed the precondition for a sharply rising criminality and the corruption of the main social institutions. The third chapter begins with a brief history of the use of imprisonment during the Soviet era, describing the administrative methods of punishment embedded into the system which Ukraine inherited on independence. The next section is a study of the Ukrainian penal system in the transitional period and shows that change has been minimal in terms of ideology, penal structures and the training of personnel. It also reveals findings on the functioning of prison enterprises, which established a deficit between prison production outputs and the sale of prison products, which is theorised as being due to private profiteering by senior prison staff. Finally, the data from an empirical study of social relations in a Ukrainian penitentiaiy are analysed on the basis of the social tolerance concept. The culture of prison life is seen as embedded in a hierarchy of roles. For these reasons, the existing prison system fails in its aim to resocialise offenders; it fails to respect human rights; and the experience of imprisonment as an exploitative system is related to the privatisation of human resources by the prison authorities. 3 Contents Abstract................................................................................................................. 2 Contents ................................................................................................................ 3 List of tables ............................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 5 Part I. Introduction and Methodology ..................................................................... 6 1. Reverse transition .............................................................................................. 6 1.2. Social tolerance and penal practice ....................................................................11 1.3. Methodology ................................................................................................... 23 Part II. Society in the transitional period ................................................................. 32 2. 1. Nomenclature ................................................................................................. 33 2. 2. Social security and the shadow economy ...........................................................53 2. 3. Criminalisation of the public realm: crime and justice .......................................69 2. 4. Latest trends in sentencing practice ................................................................. 87 2. 5. Abolition of the death penalty ..........................................................................89 2. 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................... 95 Part HI. Prisons ......................................................................................................99 3.1. Introduction: the legacy of GULag ................................................................... 99 3. 2. The current state of the Ukrainian penal system ................................................ 127 3.3. Prison staff ..................................................................................................... 153 3.4. Production and financial functioning of penal colonies in 1997-1998 .................. 159 3.5. Conclusions .................................................................................................... 171 Part IV. The empirical study of social tolerance in prison ....................................... 173 4.1. Characteristics of the quota sample ................................................................... 174 4.2. The social tolerance scale .................................................................................177 4.3. Social relations in the strict regime institution - IES-87 ...................................... 203 4.4. Attitudes of the prison staff to prisoners - IES-87 .............................................. 235 4.5. Conclusions .................................................................................................... 243 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 245 Bibliography .............................................................................................................257 Glossary....................................................................................................................276 Appendix I (Questionnaire) ....................................................................................... 279 Appendix II (Data used for correlation analysis) .......................................................... 283 4 List of tables 1 . Dynamics of trust in the social institutions of Ukraine .....................................................................................14 2 . What personality traits are attributed to Ukrainian politicians? .....................................................................52 3 . Main causes of death in Ukraine ........................................................................................................................55 4 . Discontinuity between poverty and prosperity ................................................................................................ 55 5. Which of the following social groups would you consider yourself as belonging to? (% ) ..........................56 6. How people’s worst feelings changed during 1996-1998 ................................................................................57 7. The structure of informal employment in Ukraine ............................................................................................61 8. Gross National Product per Capita, $ in Ukraine 1991-1999 .......................................................................... 68 9. The structure of criminality in Ukraine (by main criminological groups).......................................................71 10. Total murders per 100,000 population in different countries ........................................................................71 11. Quantity of registered economic crimes in 1992-1999 ................................................................................... 75 12. Court verdicts in Ukraine 1997 -1999 ............................................................................................................. 87 13. What do you think of the death penalty? Should it to be abolished or extended? .........................................92 14. Sentences passed by the courts, imprisonment and recidivism in 1987-1999 ............................................. 132 15. Crimes and sentenced criminals (1996-1997) ................................................................................................... 134 16. Increase in the number of offenders convicted for minor crimes (term up to 3 years) ...................................135 17. Number of inmates in penal colonies sentenced for violent crimes in 1994-1999 ........................................ 136 18. Crime level per 1,000 prisoners ........................................................................................................................... 137 19. Number of inmates
Recommended publications
  • No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011

    No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011

    No Justice for Journalists in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia September 2011 ARTICLE 19 Free Word Centre 60 Farringdon Road London EC1R 3GA United Kingdom Tel: +44 20 7324 2500 Fax: +44 20 7490 0566 E-mail: [email protected] www.article19.org International Media Support (IMS) Nørregarde 18, 2nd floor 1165 Copenhagen K Denmark Tel: +45 88 32 7000 Fax: +45 33 12 0099 E-mail: [email protected] www.i-m-s.dk ISBN: 978-1-906586-27-0 © ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS), London and Copenhagen, August 2011 This work is provided under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 licence. You are free to copy, distribute and display this work and to make derivative works, provided you: 1) give credit to ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS); 2) do not use this work for commercial purposes; 3) distribute any works derived from this publication under a licence identical to this one. To access the full legal text of this licence, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ legalcode. ARTICLE 19 and International Media Support (IMS) would appreciate receiving a copy of any materials in which information from this report is used. This report was written and published within the framework of a project supported by the International Media Support (IMS) Media and Democracy Programme for Central and Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. It was compiled and written by Nathalie Losekoot, Senior Programme Officer for Europe at ARTICLE 19 and reviewed by JUDr. Barbora Bukovskà, Senior Director for Law at ARTICLE 19 and Jane Møller Larsen, Programme Coordinator for the Media and Democracy Unit at International Media Support (IMS).
  • Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018

    Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018

    VIOLENT CRIMES Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 Kharkiv Human Rights Publisher 2018 УДК 355.012АТО(477)’’2014/2018’’(047)=111 Н31 THE List OF abbreviations This report was prepared with financial support of AI — Amnesty International; MTOT — Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Terri- tories and Internally Displaced Persons; ATO — Anti-Terrorist Operation; NGO — Non-Governmental Organization CC — Criminal Code of Ukraine; NPU — National Police of Ukraine; CMA — Civil-Military Administration; OTDLR — Occupied Territories of Donetsk and Lu- СMPO — Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office; hansk Regions; СP — Checkpoint; OSCE — Organization for Security and Coopera- CPC — Criminal Procedural Code; tion in Europe; EXCP — Entry-Exit Checkpoint; PLWHA — People Living with HIV/AIDS; DSA — District State Administration; RSA — Regional State Administration; RS — Rome Statute; ECHR — European Convention on Human Rights; Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlushchenko, Boris Knyrov, Natalia Okhotnikova, Anna Ovdiienko, LNR — the self-proclaimed “Luhansk People’s ECtHR — European Court of Human Rights; Olena Richko, Gennady Shcherbak, Pavlo Shvab, Yanina Smelyanska, Igor Sosonsky, Republic”; Gennadiy Tokarev, Martha Vovk, Anastasia Yegorova, Yevgeniy Zakharov GC — Geneva Convention(s) of 12 August 1949; DNR — the self-proclaimed “Donetsk People’s Н31 Violent Crimes Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 / HRMM — UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission Republic”; compiler Yevgeniy Zakharov; CO “Kharkiv
  • LETHAL INJECTION: the Medical Technology of Execution

    LETHAL INJECTION: the Medical Technology of Execution

    LETHAL INJECTION: The medical technology of execution Introduction From hanging to electric chair to lethal injection: how much prettier can you make it? Yet the prettier it becomes, the uglier it is.1 In 1997, China became the first country outside the USA to carry out a judicial execution by lethal injection. Three other countriesGuatemala, Philippines and Taiwancurrently provide for execution by lethal injection but have not yet executed anyone by that method2. The introduction of lethal injection in the USA in 1977 provoked a debate in the medical profession and strong opposition to a medical role in such executions. To 30 September 1997, 268 individuals have been executed by lethal injection in the USA since the first such execution in December 1982 (see appendix 2). Reports of lethal injection executions in China, where the method was introduced in 1997, are sketchy but early indications are that there is a potential for massive use of this form of execution. In 1996, Amnesty International recorded more than 4,300 executions by shooting in China. At least 24 lethal injection executions were reported in the Chinese press in 1997 and this can be presumed to be a minimum (and growing) figure since executions are not automatically reported in the Chinese media. Lethal injection executions depend on medical drugs and procedures and the potential of this kind of execution to involve medical professionals in unethical behaviour, including direct involvement in killing, is clear. Because of this, there has been a long-standing campaign by some individual health professionals and some professional bodies to prohibit medical participation in lethal injection executions.
  • The Death Penalty in Belarus

    The Death Penalty in Belarus

    Part 1. Histor ical Overview The Death Penalty in Belarus Vilnius 2016 1 The Death Penalty in Belarus The documentary book, “The Death Penalty in Belarus”, was prepared in the framework of the campaign, “Human Rights Defenders against the Death Penalty in Belarus”. The book contains information on the death penalty in Belarus from 1998 to 2016, as it was in 1998 when the mother of Ivan Famin, a man who was executed for someone else’s crimes, appealed to the Human Rights Center “Viasna”. Among the exclusive materials presented in this publication there is the historical review, “A History of The Death Penalty in Belarus”, prepared by Dzianis Martsinovich, and a large interview with a former head of remand prison No. 1 in Minsk, Aleh Alkayeu, under whose leadership about 150 executions were performed. This book is designed not only for human rights activists, but also for students and teachers of jurisprudence, and wide public. 2 Part 1. Histor ical Overview Life and Death The Death penalty. These words evoke different feelings and ideas in different people, including fair punishment, cruelty and callousness of the state, the cold steel of the headsman’s axe, civilized barbarism, pistol shots, horror and despair, revolutionary expediency, the guillotine with a basket where the severed heads roll, and many other things. Man has invented thousands of ways to kill his fellows, and his bizarre fantasy with the methods of execution is boundless. People even seem to show more humanness and rationalism in killing animals. After all, animals often kill one another. A well-known Belarusian artist Lionik Tarasevich grows hundreds of thoroughbred hens and roosters on his farm in the village of Validy in the Białystok district.
  • IRI's Friends in Russia: the Anti-Utopiain Power

    IRI's Friends in Russia: the Anti-Utopiain Power

    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 23, Number 36, September 6, 1996 �ITillStrategic Studies IRI's friends in Russia: the anti-utopiain power by Roman Bessonov With this contribution from our Russian correspondent is going to take over, and what the next consequences will Roman Bessonov, EIR continues to expose the fraud of"Proj­ be-actually, to what is historically known as the Russian ect Democracy, "I applied in Russia.2 The cast of characters smuta, or Time of Troubles.3 introduced in this installment, exposes the viciousness of the Russians appear to be deeply disappointed in political argument, which is axiomatic for the International Republi­ parties, and the State Duma's consensus for the confirmation can Institute (IR/) and kindred "Project Democracy" vehi­ of Viktor Chernomyrdin as prime minister, in which two­ cles, that the proponents of "free market" reformsrate as the thirds of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation dep­ only truly" democratic" forces in Russia. Subsequent articles uties joined, is evidence that not even the CPRF and its elec­ will explore the activity of the IRI. toral bloc, which had just fieldedthe strong Presidential candi­ dacy of Gennadi Zyuganov (he received 32% to Yeltsin's The mass media story, that there was a "new victory of democ­ 35% in the first round; 41% to Yeltsin's 53% in the second), racy in Russia" in the June-July 1996 elections, sounds less constitute a clearly definedopposition. There are no vigorous, and less convincing.The latest events, including the resump­ independent
  • Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders

    Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders

    Introductory Handbook on The Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES Cover photo: © Rafael Olivares, Dirección General de Centros Penales de El Salvador. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2018 © United Nations, December 2018. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Preface The first version of the Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders, published in 2012, was prepared for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) by Vivienne Chin, Associate of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Canada, and Yvon Dandurand, crimi- nologist at the University of the Fraser Valley, Canada. The initial draft of the first version of the Handbook was reviewed and discussed during an expert group meeting held in Vienna on 16 and 17 November 2011.Valuable suggestions and contributions were made by the following experts at that meeting: Charles Robert Allen, Ibrahim Hasan Almarooqi, Sultan Mohamed Alniyadi, Tomris Atabay, Karin Bruckmüller, Elias Carranza, Elinor Wanyama Chemonges, Kimmett Edgar, Aida Escobar, Angela Evans, José Filho, Isabel Hight, Andrea King-Wessels, Rita Susana Maxera, Marina Menezes, Hugo Morales, Omar Nashabe, Michael Platzer, Roberto Santana, Guy Schmit, Victoria Sergeyeva, Zhang Xiaohua and Zhao Linna.
  • Florida's Legislative and Judicial Responses to Furman V. Georgia: an Analysis and Criticism

    Florida's Legislative and Judicial Responses to Furman V. Georgia: an Analysis and Criticism

    Florida State University Law Review Volume 2 Issue 1 Article 3 Winter 1974 Florida's Legislative and Judicial Responses to Furman v. Georgia: An Analysis and Criticism Tim Thornton Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Tim Thornton, Florida's Legislative and Judicial Responses to Furman v. Georgia: An Analysis and Criticism, 2 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 108 (1974) . https://ir.law.fsu.edu/lr/vol2/iss1/3 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Florida State University Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES FLORIDA'S LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL RESPONSES TO FURMAN V. GEORGIA: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITICISM On June 29, 1972, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed the constitutionality of the death penalty by deciding the case of Furman v. Georgia' and its two companion cases.2 The five man majority agreed only upon a one paragraph per curiam opinion, which held that "the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in these cases constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.'" The per curiam opinion 4 of the majority was followed by five separate concurring opinions and four separate dissents.5 The impact of the Furman decision reached beyond the lives of the three petitioners involved.6 In Stewart v. Massachusetts7 and its companion cases," all decided on the same day as Furman, the Supreme Court vacated death sentences in more than 120 other capital cases, which had been imposed under the capital punishment statutes of 26 states.
  • Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1

    Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1

    ARTICLES Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine 8 Mečislav BORÁK at the Time of the Great Purge Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1 prof. Mečislav BORÁK Abstract In its introduction, the study recalls the course of Czech emigration to Ukraine and the formation of the local Czech minority from the mid-19th century until the end of 1930s. Afterwards, it depicts the course of political persecution of the Czechs from the civil war to the mid-1930s and mentions the changes in Soviet national policy. It characterizes the course of the Great Purge in the years 1937–1938 on a national scale and its particularities in Ukraine, describes the genesis of the repressive mechanisms and their activities. In this context, it is focused on the NKVD’s national operations and the repression of the Czechs assigned to the Polish NKVD operation in the early spring of 1938. It analyses the illegal executions of more than 660 victims, which was roughly half of all Czechs and Czechoslovak citizens executed for political reasons in the former Soviet Union, both from time and territorial point of view, including the national or social-professional structure of the executed, roughly compared to Moscow. The general conclusions are illustrated on examples of repressive actions and their victims from the Kiev region, especially from Kiev, and Mykolajivka community, not far from the centre of the Vinnycko area, the most famous centre of Czech colonization in eastern Podolia. In detail, it analyses the most repressive action against the Czechs in Ukraine which took place in Zhytomyr where on 28 September 1938, eighty alleged conspirators were shot dead, including seventy-eight Czechs.
  • TCA Awards: Jon Hamm

    TCA Awards: Jon Hamm

    lifestyle MONDAY, AUGUST 10, 2015 Amy Schumer on ‘Trainwreck,’ gender and gun control ello, everybody!’ gushed Amy Schumer. bursting into Saturday’s ‘Hpress conference room at Switzerland’s Locarno and applauding herself. “Well, thank you!”And for the next 27 minutes, sitting beside her sister Kim Caramele, who played straight gal at the conference and takes an associate producer credit on “Trainwreck” - two or more Amy Schumers fielded questions from the international press as she tub- thumped the Judd Apatow-directed “Trainwreck” hours before Saturday’s European premiere. There was her feted comic persona, the ditzy femme airhead, known from Comedy Central’s “Inside Amy Schumer” and the - one presumes- much more real life person shooting from the hip, and still often very funny, on herself, gun control (well-less funny on that one), working with Judd Apatow, “Trainwreck,” humor and multiple other topics. Schumer was very fast, could answer comically without missing a beat, did not disappoint. Comedian Amy Schumer and US Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speak at a press conference A screengrab from the 2015 film ‘Trainwreck’. “Trainwreck” played to Europe’s press Friday calling for tighter gun laws in an effort to stop mass shootings and gun violence. — AFP night to consistent laughter at what will proba- many more scenes; in film, it was more “relax- feminist icon? “I’m proud to be a feminist. I think bly be the most-attended press screening at ing” playing just one character. everybody in this room is proud to be a feminist. Locarno. Remarkably then, at the “Trainwreck” I’ve just got an email from Gloria Steinem.
  • The Master and Margarita Mikhail Bulgakov Pdf

    The Master and Margarita Mikhail Bulgakov Pdf

    The master and margarita mikhail bulgakov pdf Continue Sometimes it's good to take on a few personal problems. I have never stopped to cross this iconic novel of Russian literature (censored like any good Russian novel), from my research in Russian language to the discovery of several passionate bloggers as I do literature. Be sure to see. But also one of those that impress you too much ... What for? I do not know. Maybe when I heard about it, I was afraid that I wasn't smart enough? Now I know I misunderstood this story. I just knew about that black cat who smokes, drinks and talks. And now I know that this book needs to be re-read. Not immediately, but in a few years. I'm sure I'll learn more with each replay. I will not try to tell a story, I make a presentation that usually is on the back of countless editions of this novel. Available in all languages, in French: Master and Margarita and Bulgakov wins the letter on his behalf. Mysterious gentleman, proclaimed himself a magician, comes to Moscow by the name of Woland, he invites himself to the conversation of two men who discuss literature in the park. The youngest is a poet, the second is Berlioz, publisher of a well-known literary magazine and one of the prominent leaders of the Moscow Literary Society. Surprised by this man's impromptu arrival, they do not know that the Russian literary world will be completely destabilized. The Wizard did not come alone: Azazello, Behemoth and Koroviev - his servants.
  • Capital Punishment

    Capital Punishment

    CAPITAL PUNISHMENT by JOHN WILLIAM KELLER !X(o B.A., St. Benedict's College, 1967 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1968 Approved by: * Majorm \nr ProfessorPrr»f mumnr TABLE OP CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. THE NATURE AND HISTORY OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 1 Introduction ....... 1 The Ancient Civilizations 3 The Dark Ages 8 The Medieval Period 9 Colonial Transition 12 II. PENAL REFORM AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 21 Recent Developments ... 28 Legal Action Groups •••••.•..29 III. CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS 33 Amendment VIII 33 Amendment XIV 36 Amendment VI 39 IV. THE COURTS, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE DEATH PENALTY 42 The Wilkerson Case / 42 Ex Parte Kemmler 44 O'Nefr l y. Vermont; 46 Howard v. Fleming 49 Weems y. United State s 50 Collins y. Johnson •• • .... 53 Louisiana y. Resveber 54 The Warren Court • 56 V. EXECUTIONS 66 Hanging • 66 Electrocution ............. 70 Gas Chamber ....73 Firing Squad ' ... 75 VI. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: A WORLD VIEW 80 The Death Penalty and the Community of Nations 81 Execution of the Death Sentence in the World • • % 83 Capital Crimes Around the World 84 Comments and Conclusions .86 VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ^ 91 LIST OF CASES 99 BIBLIOGRAPHY 101 LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE I. Capital Punishment in the United States 23 II. Capital Crimes in the Fifty One Jurisdictions 24 III. Methods of Executions by States 76 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his sincere appreciation to the people who Joined In the. preparation of this pro- ject.
  • SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES Mr • Justice Marshall Kr

    SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES Mr • Justice Marshall Kr

    / To: The Chief Justice Mr. Justice Douglas Mr. Justice Brennan 1st DRAFT Mr. Justice Stewart Mr. Justice White SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Mr • Justice Marshall Kr. Justice Blackmun ~uat1oe Pow~ MEMORANDUM OF MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST From: Rehnquist, J. Re: CAPITAL CASES Circulated: ~ h3/-, '1..- [June -, 1972J / Recirculated: Petitioners seck from this Court a decision that would ------- at one fell swoop invalidate laws enacted by Congress and 41 of the 50 state legislatures, and would consign to the limbo of unconstitutionality under a single rubric pen- alties for offenses as varied and unique as murder, piracy, mutiny, highjacking, and desertion in the face of the enemy. Such a holding would necessarily bring into sharp relief the fundamental question of the role of ju- dicial review in a democratic society. How can govern- ment by the elected representatives of the people co-exist with the power of the federal judiciary, whose members arc constitutionally insulated from responsiveness to the popular will, to declare invalid laws duly enacted by the popular branches of government? The answer, of course, is found in Hamilton's Federalist Paper No. 78 and in Chief Justice Marshall's classic opin­ ion in Marbu1'y v. Madison, 1 Crunch 137 (1803). An oft told story since then, it bears summarization once more. Sovereignty resides ultimately in the people as a whole, and by adopting through their States a written ConstitutiOil for the Nation, and subsequently adding amendments to that instrument, they have both granted certain powers to the national Government, and denied other powers to the national and the state governments.