Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine Between 2014–2018 VIOLENT CRIMES Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 Kharkiv Human Rights Publisher 2018 УДК 355.012АТО(477)’’2014/2018’’(047)=111 Н31 THE List OF abbreviations This report was prepared with financial support of AI — Amnesty International; MTOT — Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Terri- tories and Internally Displaced Persons; ATO — Anti-Terrorist Operation; NGO — Non-Governmental Organization CC — Criminal Code of Ukraine; NPU — National Police of Ukraine; CMA — Civil-Military Administration; OTDLR — Occupied Territories of Donetsk and Lu- СMPO — Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office; hansk Regions; СP — Checkpoint; OSCE — Organization for Security and Coopera- CPC — Criminal Procedural Code; tion in Europe; EXCP — Entry-Exit Checkpoint; PLWHA — People Living with HIV/AIDS; DSA — District State Administration; RSA — Regional State Administration; RS — Rome Statute; ECHR — European Convention on Human Rights; Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlushchenko, Boris Knyrov, Natalia Okhotnikova, Anna Ovdiienko, LNR — the self-proclaimed “Luhansk People’s ECtHR — European Court of Human Rights; Olena Richko, Gennady Shcherbak, Pavlo Shvab, Yanina Smelyanska, Igor Sosonsky, Republic”; Gennadiy Tokarev, Martha Vovk, Anastasia Yegorova, Yevgeniy Zakharov GC — Geneva Convention(s) of 12 August 1949; DNR — the self-proclaimed “Donetsk People’s Н31 Violent Crimes Committed During the Armed Conflict in Eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018 / HRMM — UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission Republic”; compiler Yevgeniy Zakharov; CO “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group”, CO “Shore of Peace”. — in Ukraine; Kharkiv: LLB “Human Rights Publisher”, 2018. — 112 p. SLC — Strategic Litigation Center; HRW — Human Rights Watch; ISBN 978-617-7391-38-7 SMM — Special Monitoring Mission; ICC — International Criminal Court; Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group and «Shore of Peace», non-governmental nonprofit human rights organizations, SP — NGO “Shore of Peace”; present to the reader a report containing various information about violent criminal acts committed during the military con- IDP — Internally Displaced Persons; SSU — Security Service of Ukraine; flict in eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018. The authors perceive in these acts the signs of numerous crimes against humanity and war crimes in accordance with IAF — Illegal Armed Formations;1 UAF — Ukrainian Armed Forces; the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. KHPG — Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group; UHHRU — Ukrainian Helsinki Human Rights This report was prepared by Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group with the support of the United Nations Union; Development Program (UNDP) and the financial support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, National Endowment LGB — Local Government Body; for Democracy, International Renaissance Foundation. UNSDC — Ukraine’s National Security and De- LAF — Legal Armed Formations;2 The views, expressed in this publication, are those of the authors and may not coincide with the official position of the UNDP, fense Council; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark, National Endowment for Democracy, International Renaissance Foundation. MD — Ministry of Defense of Ukraine; URPTI — Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investiga- УДК 355.012АТО(477)’’2014/2018’’(047)=111 MI — Ministry of Interior of Ukraine; tions; © Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlushchenko, VRU — Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Boris Knyrov, Natalia Okhotnikova, MLRS — Multiple Launch Rocket System; Anna Ovdiienko, Olena Richko, Gennady Shcherbak, Pavlo Shvab, 1 Yanina Smelyanska, Igor Sosonsky, “Illegal armed formations” is a cumulative term that Gennadiy Tokarev, Martha Vovk, signifies the pro-Russian separatist (anti-government) Anastasia Yegorova, Yevgeniy Zakharov groups operating in eastern Ukraine. © Yevgeniy Zakharov, compiled, 2018 2 “Lawful armed formations” is a cumulative term that © CO “Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group”, 2018 signifies the Ukrainian armed forces and law enforce- © CO “Shore of Peace”, 2018 ment agencies (e. g. National police, National Guard, ISBN 978-617-7391-38-7 © Oleg Miroshnychenko, design, 2018 Security service, etc.). 2 THE LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 3 1. SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION wo Ukrainian non-governmental nonprofit human 1) Murder (extrajudicial killings, torturing to HPG and SP provide information on the crimes and unlawful imprisonment. SP documentators Trights organizations, the Kharkiv Human Rights death, killings of civilians as a result of iso- Kcommitted in the context of the armed conflict in have already carried out 72 trips for interrogation of Protection Group (KHPG) and the Shore of Peace (SP), lated attacks); eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018, calling upon victims and witnesses who were held in captivity by present the report, which contains information about 2) Attacks on the civilians and the destruction of the Prosecutor of the ICC to open an investigation the LNR and DNR authorities. SP created its own da- the alleged crimes committed during the armed con- civilian objects (intentional attacks, indiscri- into the situation of Ukraine. This is the first joint tabase, which is one of the most comprehensive and flict in eastern Ukraine between 2014–2018. minate attacks, deaths as the result of explo- communication to the Office of the Prosecutor pre- accurate in Ukraine in relation to the documented KHPG and SP find that the crimes enumerated in sions — mines, trip wire etc., the destruction pared by the two organizations. crimes that have been committed on the territory of and damage of buildings and infrastructure); this report constitute crimes against humanity and war KHPG was registered in 1992 and has acted as a eastern Ukraine since the beginning of the conflict. 3) Willfully causing great suffering, or serious crimes within the jurisdiction of the ICC. There are rea- human rights group of the Kharkiv Association ‘Me- As of September 1, 2018, the database contains in- injury to body or health; sonable grounds to believe that these crimes qualify morial’ since 1989. KHPG’s work focuses on (1) up- formation on more than 19,000 people — prisoners, 4) Extensive destruction and appropriation of as crimes against humanity under articles 7 (1) (a), (e), holding and protecting the rights of individuals missing persons, dead and injured in hostilities and property, not justified by military necessity, (f), (g), (h) and (i); and as war crimes under Article 8(2) who suffered human rights violations, handling up in captivity; victims of torture and unlawful deten- and carried out unlawfully and wantonly; (a) (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), (vi), (b) (i). (ii), (iv), (v), (ix), (xxi), 5) Use of protected persons as «human shields»; to 3,000 written submissions on the annual basis, tion; witnesses to crime(s); and suspects of crimes (xxii), (xxiii), (c) (i), (ii), (e) (i), (ii), (iv) and (vi) of the RS. 6) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of (2) keeping the Ukrainian government and society (members of IAF). SP communicated information The report includes information on all the crimes physical liberty in the unlawful places of de- informed about the human rights violations, (3) an- contained in its database to the national authorities which is supported by the evidence available to tention (separately in relation to military per- alyzing Ukraine’s compliance with human rights of Ukraine — Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office, Gen- KHPG and SP. sonnel and civilians); and fundamental freedoms. KHPG strives to im- eral Prosecutor’s Office, National Police of Ukraine, Section 2 (Introduction) provides a brief overview 7) Torture and inhuman treatment (separately in prove the human rights situation in Ukraine, in par- the Security Service of Ukraine in the Volyn region, of the work of KHPG and SP, and expresses gratitude relation military personnel and civilian); ticular with respect to the protection of the right to and numerous public organizations. SP members to the international donor organizations that sup- 8) Sexual and gender based violence; life, prohibition of torture, prohibition of arbitrary provide legal advice to the victims of crimes and ported our efforts, as well as to the partner organiza- 9) Outrages upon personal dignity (parades of detention, freedom of expression, the right to priva- family members of servicemen who were killed or tions that participated in the collection of evidence. captives, forcing detainees to eat insignia cy, the human rights of marginalized groups, such injured, represent their interests and litigate in Section 3 (Methodology) describes methodology of their military uniforms, forcing detainees as prisoners, PLWHA, drug addicts, asylum seekers cases heard in national courts. The organization is that has been used in preparation of this report, in to reinter decomposed corpses of Ukrainian and others. KHPG’s Strategic Litigation Center (SLC) headquartered in Lutsk. particular: (1) SP and KHPG databases; (2) methodo- military servicemen, etc.). established in 2003, is handling up to 200 strate- The report was authored by the staff members logy of the monitoring visits to the areas located on The report also lists crimes that require more de- gic cases per year both in the national courts and of KHPG, namely Yuriy Aseev, Volodymyr Hlush- the territory controlled by the Ukrainian government; tailed consideration in separate prospective reports the ECtHR. The Center’s lawyers won more than 120 chenko, Anna Ovdiienko, Natalia Okhotnikova, Ole- to the ICC Office of The Prosecutor, such as enforced (3) interviews
Recommended publications
  • Mental Health in Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts - 2018
    Mental health in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts - 2018 1 Content List of abbreviations....................................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 2. METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ....................................................................................................... 6 3. RESUME .................................................................................................................................................. 8 4. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF THE RESEARCH .................................................. 13 5. PREVALENCE OF MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AMONG THE PEOPLE LIVING IN DONETSK AND LUHANSK OBLASTS ...................................................................................................................................... 16 А. Detecting the traumatic experience .................................................................................................... 16 B. Prevalence of symptoms of PTSD, depression, anxiety disorder, excess alcohol consumption. ........ 18 C. Prevalence of mental health problems among the inner circle of the respondents .......................... 27 D. Indicators of mental well-being .......................................................................................................... 27 6. ACCESS TO ASSISTANCE WHEN SUFFERING FROM
    [Show full text]
  • REQUIEM for DONBAS Three Essays on the Costs of War in Ukraine
    JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ Altenberger Str. 69 4040 Linz, Austria www.jku.at, DVR 0093696 REQUIEM FOR DONBAS Three Essays on the Costs of War in Ukraine By Artem Kochnev A Doctoral Thesis submitted at Department of Economics to obtain the academic degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Doctoral Program “PhD Program in Economics” Supervisor and First Examiner Second Examiner em. Univ-Prof. Dr. Michael Landesmann Dr. habil. rer. soc. oec. Robert Stehrer May 2020 Abstract The thesis investigates short- and long-term effects of war on the economy of Ukraine. Specifically, it discusses the impact of separatists’ control and subsequent adverse trade policies on the real economy, responses of stock market investors to battle events, and the effect of conflict intensity on reform progress and institutional change in Ukraine. The thesis finds that the impact of war on the economy is most pronounced on the real economy of the war-torn regions. Whereas separatists’ control caused a decline in economic activity by at least 38%, the thesis does not find evidence supporting that the impact of conflict intensity on asset prices and institutional change in Ukraine was linear in parameters. The thesis explains the lack of the linear relationship between asset price move- ments and conflict intensity by investors’ inattention caused by information overload during the early stages of the conflict. Regarding the possible relationship between con- flict and institutional change, the thesis argues that it was electoral competition, not the conflict dynamics, that had an impact on the decision-making process of the policymak- ers in Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders
    Introductory Handbook on The Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES Cover photo: © Rafael Olivares, Dirección General de Centros Penales de El Salvador. UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders CRIMINAL JUSTICE HANDBOOK SERIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2018 © United Nations, December 2018. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Preface The first version of the Introductory Handbook on the Prevention of Recidivism and the Social Reintegration of Offenders, published in 2012, was prepared for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) by Vivienne Chin, Associate of the International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy, Canada, and Yvon Dandurand, crimi- nologist at the University of the Fraser Valley, Canada. The initial draft of the first version of the Handbook was reviewed and discussed during an expert group meeting held in Vienna on 16 and 17 November 2011.Valuable suggestions and contributions were made by the following experts at that meeting: Charles Robert Allen, Ibrahim Hasan Almarooqi, Sultan Mohamed Alniyadi, Tomris Atabay, Karin Bruckmüller, Elias Carranza, Elinor Wanyama Chemonges, Kimmett Edgar, Aida Escobar, Angela Evans, José Filho, Isabel Hight, Andrea King-Wessels, Rita Susana Maxera, Marina Menezes, Hugo Morales, Omar Nashabe, Michael Platzer, Roberto Santana, Guy Schmit, Victoria Sergeyeva, Zhang Xiaohua and Zhao Linna.
    [Show full text]
  • QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES REPORT of Civic Network OPORA for the Period 1 July – 30 September, 2014
    01103, Kyiv, Pidvysotskoho St. 10/10, office 3 www.oporaua.org, [email protected] +38 044 286 26 70 QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES REPORT of Civic Network OPORA For the Period 1 July – 30 September, 2014 1 01103, Kyiv, Pidvysotskoho St. 10/10, office 3 www.oporaua.org, [email protected] +38 044 286 26 70 CONTENT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Political framework ................................................................................................................................... 4 PROGRAM ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................... 5 Objective 1: Fairness and integrity of key Ukrainian elections improved through domestic monitoring … 4 Long-term observation ............................................................................................................................. 5 Public reports covering long-term parliamentary observation: ............................................................... 6 Preparation of a questionnaire ................................................................................................................. 6 Software development ............................................................................................................................. 7 REPORT ON OPORA’s PUBLIC OUTREACH AND INFORMATION STRATEGYINFORMATION REPORT OF THE CIVIC NETWORK OPORA FROM 1 JULY
    [Show full text]
  • FROM DESPAIR to HOPE LGBT Situation in Ukraine in 2014
    FROM DESPAIR TO HOPE LGBT situation in Ukraine in 2014 LGBT Human Rights Nash Mir Center Council of LGBT Organizations of Ukraine Kyiv 2015 From Despair to Hope. LGBT situation in Ukraine in 2014 This publication provides information that reflects the social, legal and political situation of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) community in Ukraine in 2014. Here are to be found data and analyses on issues related to the rights and interests of LGBT persons in legislation, public and political life, public opinion, and examples of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation etc. Authors: Andrii Kravchuk, Oleksandr Zinchenkov Project Manager of Nash Mir Center: Andriy Maymulakhin The authors would like to thank NGOs Association LGBT LIGA, Gay Forum of Ukraine, Lyudy Bukoviny, LGBT Union You Are Not Alone and all active participants in the LGBT Leaders e-mailing list and Facebook groups who collect and exchange relevant information on various aspects of the situation of LGBT people in Ukraine. Very special thanks to J. Stephen Hunt (Chicago, USA) for his proofreading of the English text and long-lasting generous support. The report is supported by Council of LGBT Organizations of Ukraine. The report “From Despair to Hope. LGBT situation in Ukraine in 2014” was prepared by Nash Mir Center as part of the project “Promoting LGBT rights in Ukraine through monitoring, legal protection & raising public awareness”. This project is realised by Nash Mir in cooperation with the Norwegian Helsinki Committee, within the framework of the program "Promotion of human rights and rule of law for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons in Ukraine" which is funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hygiene Practice by Caregivers
    Public Opinion Survey on Water, Sanitation and Hygiene KAP study Analytical Report Prepared for August 2016 1 Content Research Tasks Methodology Key Findings Water Supply Situation in the Households Toilet Conditions in the Households Garbage Disposal Household Cleaning Practices Household Hygiene Practices Hygiene Practice by Children WASH Situation in Public Places Media Consumption Communication Campaign Evaluation Appendix: Households` Profile 2 Research Tasks • To develop a set of indicators for sanitation and hygiene practices and behavior; • To assess knowledge, attitude and practice of sanitation and hygiene habits within the area and target audience; • To identify cultural beliefs, norms, habits and misconceptions; • To evaluate current situation and challenges affecting existing knowledge, attitudes and behavior; • To identify target audience challenges in access to drinking and technical water; • To identify barriers hindering proper hygiene behavior; • To assess challenges and opportunities for improving hygiene behavior of target population; • To identify WASH knowledge, attitude and practices; • To evaluate the use of ADRA / UNICEF hygiene promotion materials and their effectiveness within the target area and among the target audience; • To assess the awareness level of www.7planets.com.ua website, its use and effectiveness; • To provide knowledge on preferred channels of communication for different target groups. 3 Methodology (1) 6 geographical areas of ADRA activities: Mariupol city; Volnovakha raion; Mariinskyi raion; Geography Nikolskiy (Volodarskiy) raion; Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiyskiy) raion; Velykonovosilkivskiy raion. The entire Donetsk oblast (GCA) was covered by the study. • Parents and caregivers of children ages 0-18 divided in 2 groups: - families with children up to 5 y.o. Target Audience - families with children 6-18 y.o.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Persons and Entities Under EU Restrictive Measures Over the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
    dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN List of persons and entities under EU restrictive measures over the territorial integrity of Ukraine List of Persons Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 1. Sergey Valeryevich DOB: 26.11.1972. Aksyonov was elected 'Prime Minister of Crimea' in the Crimean 17.3.2014 AKSYONOV, Verkhovna Rada on 27 February 2014 in the presence of pro-Russian POB: Beltsy (Bălţi), gunmen. His 'election' was decreed unconstitutional by the acting Sergei Valerievich now Republic of Ukrainian President Oleksandr Turchynov on 1 March 2014. He actively AKSENOV (Сергей Moldova lobbied for the 'referendum' of 16 March 2014 and was one of the co- Валерьевич signatories of the ’treaty on Crimea´s accession to the Russian AKCëHOB), Federation’ of 18 March 2014. On 9 April 2014 he was appointed acting Serhiy Valeriyovych ‘Head’ of the so-called ‘Republic of Crimea’ by President Putin. On 9 AKSYONOV (Сергiй October 2014, he was formally ‘elected’ 'Head' of the so-called 'Republic Валерiйович Аксьонов) of Crimea'. Aksyonov subsequently decreed that the offices of ‘Head’ and ‘Prime Minister’ be combined. Member of the Russia State Council. 1/83 dhdsh PRESS Council of the European Union EN Name Identifying Reasons Date of listing information 2. Rustam Ilmirovich DOB: 15.8.1976 As former Deputy Minister of Crimea, Temirgaliev played a relevant role 17.3.2014 TEMIRGALIEV in the decisions taken by the ‘Supreme Council’ concerning the POB: Ulan-Ude, ‘referendum’ of 16 March 2014 against the territorial integrity of Ukraine. (Рустам Ильмирович Buryat ASSR He lobbied actively for the integration of Crimea into the Russian Темиргалиев) (Russian SFSR) Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly 1992, No.26
    www.ukrweekly.com Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc.ic, a, fraternal non-profit association! ramian V Vol. LX No. 26 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY0, JUNE 28, 1992 50 cents Orthodox Churches Kravchuk, Yeltsin conclude accord at Dagomys summit by Marta Kolomayets Underscoring their commitment to signed by the two presidents, as well as Kiev Press Bureau the development of the democratic their Supreme Council chairmen, Ivan announce union process, the two sides agreed they will Pliushch of Ukraine and Ruslan Khas- by Marta Kolomayets DAGOMYS, Russia - "The agree­ "build their relations as friendly states bulatov of Russia, and Ukrainian Prime Kiev Press Bureau ment in Dagomys marks a radical turn and will immediately start working out Minister Vitold Fokin and acting Rus­ KIEV — As The Weekly was going to in relations between two great states, a large-scale political agreements which sian Prime Minister Yegor Gaidar. press, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church change which must lead our relations to would reflect the new qualities of rela­ The Crimea, another difficult issue in faction led by Metropolitan Filaret and a full-fledged and equal inter-state tions between them." Ukrainian-Russian relations was offi­ the Ukrainian Autocephalous Ortho­ level," Ukrainian President Leonid But several political breakthroughs cially not on the agenda of the one-day dox Church, which is headed by Metro­ Kravchuk told a press conference after came at the one-day meeting held at this summit, but according to Mr. Khasbu- politan Antoniy of Sicheslav and the conclusion of the first Ukrainian- beach resort, where the Black Sea is an latov, the topic was discussed in various Pereyaslav in the absence of Mstyslav I, Russian summit in Dagomys, a resort inviting front yard and the Caucasus circles.
    [Show full text]
  • Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1
    ARTICLES Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine 8 Mečislav BORÁK at the Time of the Great Purge Persecution of the Czech Minority in Ukraine at the Time of the Great Purge1 prof. Mečislav BORÁK Abstract In its introduction, the study recalls the course of Czech emigration to Ukraine and the formation of the local Czech minority from the mid-19th century until the end of 1930s. Afterwards, it depicts the course of political persecution of the Czechs from the civil war to the mid-1930s and mentions the changes in Soviet national policy. It characterizes the course of the Great Purge in the years 1937–1938 on a national scale and its particularities in Ukraine, describes the genesis of the repressive mechanisms and their activities. In this context, it is focused on the NKVD’s national operations and the repression of the Czechs assigned to the Polish NKVD operation in the early spring of 1938. It analyses the illegal executions of more than 660 victims, which was roughly half of all Czechs and Czechoslovak citizens executed for political reasons in the former Soviet Union, both from time and territorial point of view, including the national or social-professional structure of the executed, roughly compared to Moscow. The general conclusions are illustrated on examples of repressive actions and their victims from the Kiev region, especially from Kiev, and Mykolajivka community, not far from the centre of the Vinnycko area, the most famous centre of Czech colonization in eastern Podolia. In detail, it analyses the most repressive action against the Czechs in Ukraine which took place in Zhytomyr where on 28 September 1938, eighty alleged conspirators were shot dead, including seventy-eight Czechs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine
    ENTERING THE GREY-ZONE: Hybrid Warfare and the Protection of Civilians in Ukraine civiliansinconflict.org i RECOGNIZE. PREVENT. PROTECT. AMEND. PROTECT. PREVENT. RECOGNIZE. Cover: June 4, 2013, Spartak, Ukraine: June 2021 Unexploded ordnances in Eastern Ukraine continue to cause harm to civilians. T +1 202 558 6958 E [email protected] civiliansinconflict.org ORGANIZATIONAL MISSION AND VISION Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC) is an international organization dedicated to promoting the protection of civilians in conflict. CIVIC envisions a world in which no civilian is harmed in conflict. Our mission is to support communities affected by conflict in their quest for protection and strengthen the resolve and capacity of armed actors to prevent and respond to civilian harm. CIVIC was established in 2003 by Marla Ruzicka, a young humanitarian who advocated on behalf of civilians affected by the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Honoring Marla’s legacy, CIVIC has kept an unflinching focus on the protection of civilians in conflict. Today, CIVIC has a presence in conflict zones and key capitals throughout the world where it collaborates with civilians to bring their protection concerns directly to those in power, engages with armed actors to reduce the harm they cause to civilian populations, and advises governments and multinational bodies on how to make life-saving and lasting policy changes. CIVIC’s strength is its proven approach and record of improving protection outcomes for civilians by working directly with conflict-affected communities and armed actors. At CIVIC, we believe civilians are not “collateral damage” and civilian harm is not an unavoidable consequence of conflict—civilian harm can and must be prevented.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Progress Report
    EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 EU Support to the East of Ukraine – Recovery, Peacebuilding and Governance Annual Progress Report August 2018 – September 2019 Table of contents List of annexes 5 Abbreviations and acronyms 6 Executive summary 7 Background 12 COMPONENT 1 16 LOCAL GOVERNANCE AND DECENTRALISATION REFORM Result 1.1 Nationwide decentralisation reform is fully implemented in the newly established Amalgamated Territorial Communities (ATCs) in areas of Donetsk and Luhansk oblast under the 18 control of the Government Result 1.2 Access to quality administrative and social services is improved 26 Result 1.3 Government capacity for participatory strategic planning and transparent project 30 implementation is enhanced. COMPONENT 2 36 ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND MSMES DEVELOPMENT REFORM Result 2.1 Network of service providers is established, and market access improved 38 Result 2.2 Access to credit and financing is improved and more flexible in Complement to KFW 43 Result 2.3 Provision of technical and vocational training is of increasing quality.. 46 COMPONENT 3 52 COMMUNITY SECURITY AND SOCIAL COHESION Result 3.1. A network of citizen groups is established to promote social cohesion and sustainable 54 socio-economic development. Result 3.2 Citizen group initiatives are financially supported. 77 COMPONENT 4 79 SECTORAL REFORMS AND STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENTS (HEALTH) Result 4.1 The regional health care system is effectively functioning at the regional
    [Show full text]
  • THEMATIC REPORT Hardship for Conflict-Affected Civilians in Eastern
    THEMATIC REPORT Hardship for conflict-affected civilians in eastern Ukraine February 2017 Published by the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine © OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine 2017 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for non- commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine as the source. Available electronically in English, Ukrainian and Russian at: Table of Contents A) Summary ..................................................................................................................................... - 1 - B) Introduction and methodology .................................................................................................... - 2 - C) General observations .................................................................................................................. - 3 - 1. Conduct of hostilities in populated areas......................................................................... - 3 - i) Presence and use of weapons in populated areas ............................................................... - 4 - ii) Presence of armed positions in populated areas ................................................................. - 5 - iii) Areas not fully controlled by any of the sides.................................................................... - 6 - 2. Imposed restrictions affecting civilians ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]