Social Due Diligence Report on Involuntary Resettlement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Social Due Diligence Report on Involuntary Resettlement Social Due Diligence Report on Involuntary Resettlement Project Number: 48118-004 September 2020 Republic of the Union of Myanmar: Greater Mekong Subregion Health Security Project (Additional Financing) Prepared by Ministry of Health and Sports for the Asian Development Bank. This safeguards due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank CDC - communicable disease control COVID-19 - coronavirus disease DOMS - Department of Medical Services GMS - Greater Mekong Subregion GRM - grievance redress mechanism MOHS - Ministry of Health and Sports PMU - project management unit SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement WHO - World Health Organization 2 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND 4 A. Introduction 4 B. Background and Project Rationale 4 II. SCOPE OF THE DUE DILIGENCE AND SUBPROJECTS/HOSPITALS 5 III. FINDINGS OF THE DUE DILIGENCE 4 IV. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 4 V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND A. Introduction 1. This is a social due diligence report on Involuntary Resettlement prepared for the proposed Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) Health Security Project (Additional Financing). 2. As per ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009), project screening and categorization are undertaken to (i) determine the significance of potential impacts or risks that a project might present with respect to the environment, involuntary resettlement, and Indigenous Peoples; (ii) identify the level of assessment and institutional resources required to address safeguard issues; and (iii) determine the information disclosure and consultation requirements. Using environment, involuntary resettlement, and Indigenous Peoples screening checklists, the project is categorized. A proposed project is assigned to one of the following categories depending on the significance of the probable involuntary resettlement impacts: Category A. A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant involuntary resettlement impacts. A resettlement plan, including assessment of social impacts, is required. Category B. A proposed project is classified as category B if it includes involuntary resettlement impacts that are not deemed significant. A resettlement plan, including assessment of social impacts, is required. Category C. A proposed project is classified as category C if it has no involuntary resettlement impacts. No further action is required. 3. A project’s involuntary resettlement category is determined by the category of its most sensitive component in terms of involuntary resettlement impacts. The involuntary resettlement impacts of an ADB-supported project are considered significant if 200 or more persons will experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets (income generating). The level of detail and comprehensiveness of the resettlement plan are commensurate with the significance of the potential impacts and risks. A screening has been done (Refer to Annexure-1) for the project and based on the screening, the additional financing is categorized as “C” for involuntary resettlement. Therefore, this due diligence has been prepared to conform the category “C” on involuntary resettlement. B. Background and Project Rationale 4. ADB approved the GMS Health Security project on 22 November 2016 for $125 million equivalent from its ordinary capital resources.1 Building on ADB’s prior investments in 1 The ongoing project comprises (i) loans to Cambodia (SDR15,012,000 [$21 million]), the Lao PDR (SDR2,856,000 [$4 million]), Myanmar ($12 million), and Viet Nam (SDR56,946,000 [$80 million]); and (ii) a grant to the Lao PDR ($8 million). ADB also provided project preparatory technical assistance of $1.3 million to Cambodia, the Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Viet Nam. ADB. Regional: Greater Mekong Subregion Health Security Project; and ADB. Technical Assistance: Greater Mekong Subregion Health Security Project. communicable disease control (CDC) in the GMS,2 the ongoing project aims to strengthen regional cooperation and subnational CDC systems, particularly in border areas. The impact of the ongoing project is strengthened GMS public health security. The outcome is GMS health system performance regarding health security improved. 5. The additional financing for Myanmar will support implementation of the government’s Health Sector Contingency Plan for coronavirus disease (COVID-19).3 It will expand the overall project scope to encompass 31 district and township hospitals requiring immediate investment for upgrading clinical care, infection prevention and control, and human resource capacity for responding to COVID-19 and other future public health threats. These 31 hospitals are located across the country’s 14 states and regions and 1 union territory. Target hospitals are in areas that are highly vulnerable because of poverty, ethnicity, and inadequate access to essential services, including health care.4 The target hospitals have also been selected with reference to the investments of other development partners, ensuring complementarities across projects.5 6. The project impact and outcome will remain the same. Activities under the additional financing will be consolidated and delivered through output 4 that is aligned with, and contributes to, the original project outcome. Output 4 will be rephrased as “emergency preparedness and response capacity for COVID-19 strengthened”. The main activities under output 4 will strengthen capacity across three core areas of district and township hospital service delivery, namely (i) clinical management and medical care services, (ii) hospital infection prevention and control, and (iii) human resources. II. SCOPE OF THE DUE DILIGENCE AND SUBPROJECTS/HOSPITALS 7. The project has various components having physical and non-physical intervention. The physical intervention is very minimal and is confined to minor renovation work. The scope covered under the due diligence is 31 existing district and township hospitals. The due diligence report has been prepared in due consultation with the executing agency which is Ministry of Health and Sports (MOHS) and in consultation with the respective hospitals. The subprojects/hospitals covered under the due diligence report are described below in Table 1 and the location map is provided in Figure-1: 2 ADB. GMS Regional Communicable Diseases Control Project; and ADB. Second GMS Regional Communicable Diseases Control Project. 3 Ministry of Health and Sports (MOHS). 2020. Health Sector Contingency Plan. Outbreak Response on COVID-19 and Other Emerging Respiratory Diseases in Myanmar. The plan is aligned with WHO’s Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID-19. WHO. 3 February 2020 (Draft). 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019 nCoV): Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan. Geneva. 4 The MOHS has identified more than 100 hospitals requiring upgrading to respond to COVID-19. Hospitals that are accessible to ethnic populations and to populations in hard-to-reach and border areas were prioritized for ADB support. Hospital selection was coordinated with other development partners involved in MOHS’s COVID-19 response. 5 ADB and other development partners ensures alignment of COVID-19 support through the health cluster coordination mechanism, established by MOHS. The World Bank will provide investment for 61 provincial, state, and district hospitals in locations not supported under the ADB additional financing. Table 1: List of Hospitals under the Due Diligence for Additional Financing No. Name of Subproject/Hospital Name of Township Name of District 1 Pharkant Township Hospital Pharkant Mohnyin 2 Puta-O Township Hospital Puta-O Puta-O 3 Bawlakhae District Hospital Bawlakhae Bawlakhae 4 Kamamaung Township Hospital Kamamaung Hpa pun 5 Myawaddy District Hospital Myawaddy Myawaddy 6 Htantalan Township Hospital Htantalan Phalan 7 Toungup Township Hospital Toungup Thandwe 8 Namhkham Township Hospital Namhkham Muse 9 Mong Set District Hospital Mong Set Mong Set 10 Kalaw District Hospital Kalaw Kalaw 11 Mine Shu township Hospital Mine Shu Loilin 12 Ye Township Hospital Ye Mawlawmyaing 13 Tanintharyi Township Hospital Tanintharyi Kawthaung 14 Boatbyin Township Hospital Boatbyin Dawei 15 Homalin District Hospital Homalin Homalin 16 Tamu District Hospital Tamu Tamu 17 Kathar District Hospital Kathar Kathar 18 Kawlin Township Hospital Kawlin Kathar 19 Satote Tayar Township Hospital Satote Tayar Minbu 20 Mindone Township Hospital Mindone Thayet 21 Gangaw District Hospital Gangaw Gangaw 22 Thayarwady District Hospital Thayarwady Thayarwady 23 Shwe Kyin Township Hospital Shwe Kyin Bago 24 Tontay Hospital Tontay Yangon South 25 Taikkyi Hospital Taikkyi Yangon North 26 Mawlamyaing Kyun Township Hospital Mawlamyaing Kyun Labutta 27 Bogalay Township Hospital Bogalay Phyapon 28 Tat Kone Hospital Tat Kone Nay Pyi Taw 29 Myingyan District Hospital Myingyan Myingyan 30 Yamethin Hospital Yamethin Yamethin 31 Mogok Hospital Mogok Mandalay Figure 1: Location of of Hospitals
Recommended publications
  • Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015
    Rakhine State Needs Assessment September 2015 This document is published by the Center for Diversity and National Harmony with the support of the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund. Publisher : Center for Diversity and National Harmony No. 11, Shweli Street, Kamayut Township, Yangon. Offset : Public ation Date : September 2015 © All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Rakhine State, one of the poorest regions in Myanmar, has been plagued by communal problems since the turn of the 20th century which, coupled with protracted underdevelopment, have kept residents in a state of dire need. This regrettable situation was compounded from 2012 to 2014, when violent communal riots between members of the Muslim and Rakhine communities erupted in various parts of the state. Since the middle of 2012, the Myanmar government, international organisations and non-governmen- tal organisations (NGOs) have been involved in providing humanitarian assistance to internally dis- placed and conflict-affected persons, undertaking development projects and conflict prevention activ- ities. Despite these efforts, tensions between the two communities remain a source of great concern, and many in the international community continue to view the Rakhine issue as the biggest stumbling block in Myanmar’s reform process. The persistence of communal tensions signaled a need to address one of the root causes of conflict: crushing poverty. However, even as various stakeholders have attempted to restore normalcy in the state, they have done so without a comprehensive needs assessment to guide them. In an attempt to fill this gap, the Center for Diversity and National Harmony (CDNH) undertook the task of developing a source of baseline information on Rakhine State, which all stakeholders can draw on when providing humanitarian and development assistance as well as when working on conflict prevention in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Village Tract of Mandalay Region !
    !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. !. Myanmar Information Management Unit !. !. !. Village Tract of Mandalay Region !. !. !. !. 95° E 96° E Tigyaing !. !. !. / !. !. Inn Net Maing Daing Ta Gaung Taung Takaung Reserved Forest !. Reserved Forest Kyauk Aing Mabein !. !. !. !. Ma Gyi Kone Reserved !. Forest Thabeikkyin !. !. Reserved Forest !. Let Pan Kyunhla Kone !. Se Zin Kone !. Kyar Hnyat !. !. Kanbalu War Yon Kone !. !. !. Pauk Ta Pin Twin Nge Mongmit Kyauk Hpyu !. !. !. Kyauk Hpyar Yae Nyar U !. Kyauk Gyi Kyet Na !. Reserved Hpa Sa Bai Na Go Forest Bar Nat Li Shaw Kyauk Pon 23° N 23° Kyauk War N 23° Kyauk Gyi Li Shaw Ohn Dan Lel U !. Chaung Gyi !. Pein Pyit !. Kin Tha Dut !. Gway Pin Hmaw Kyauk Sin Sho !. Taze !. !. Than Lwin Taung Dun Taung Ah Shey Bawt Lone Gyi Pyaung Pyin !. Mogoke Kyauk Ka Paing Ka Thea Urban !. Hle Bee Shwe Ho Weik Win Ka Bar Nyaung Mogoke Ba Mun !. Pin Thabeikkyin Kyat Pyin !. War Yae Aye !. Hpyu Taung Hpyu Yaung Nyaung Nyaung Urban Htauk Kyauk Pin Ta Lone Pin Thar Tha Ohn Zone Laung Zin Pyay Lwe Ngin Monglon !. Ye-U Khin-U !. !. !. !. !. Reserved Forest Shwe Kyin !. !. Tabayin !. !. !. !. Shauk !. Pin Yoe Reserved !. Kyauk Myaung Nga Forest SAGAING !. Pyin Inn War Nat Taung Shwebo Yon !. Khu Lel Kone Mar Le REGION Singu Let Pan Hla !. Urban !. Koke Ko Singu Shwe Hlay Min !. Kyaung !. Seik Khet Thin Ngwe Taung MANDALAY Se Gyi !. Se Thei Nyaung Wun Taung Let Pan Kyar U Yin REGION Yae Taw Inn Kani Kone Thar !. !. Yar Shwe Pyi Wa Di Shwe Done !. Mya Sein Sin Htone Thay Gyi Shwe SHAN Budalin Hin Gon Taing Kha Tet !. Thar Nyaung Pin Chin Hpo Zee Pin Lel Wetlet Kyun Inn !.
    [Show full text]
  • 46399E642.Pdf
    PGDS in DOS Myanmar Atlas Map Population and Geographic Data Section As of January 2006 Division of Operational Support Email : [email protected] ((( Yüeh-hsi ((( ((( Zayü ((( ((( BANGLADESHBANGLADESH ((( Xichang ((( Zhongdian ((( Ho-pien-tsun Cox'sCox's BazarBazar ((( ((( ((( ((( Dibrugrh ((( ((( ((( (((Meiyu ((( Dechang THIMPHUTHIMPHU ((( ((( ((( Myanmar_Atlas_A3PC.WOR ((( Ningnan ((( ((( Qiaojia ((( Dayan ((( Yongsheng KutupalongKutupalong ((( Huili ((( ((( Golaghat ((( Jianchuan ((( Huize ((( ((( ((( Cooch Behar ((( North Gauhati Nowgong (((( ((( Goalpara (((( Gauhati MYANMARMYANMAR ((( MYANMARMYANMAR ((( MYANMARMYANMAR ((( MYANMARMYANMAR ((( MYANMARMYANMAR ((( MYANMARMYANMAR ((( Dinhata ((( ((( Gauripur ((( Dongch ((( ((( ((( Dengchuan ((( Longjie ((( Lalmanir Hat ((( Yanfeng ((( Rangpur ((( ((( ((( ((( Yuanmou ((( Yangbi((( INDIAINDIA ((( INDIAINDIA ((( INDIAINDIA ((( INDIAINDIA ((( INDIAINDIA ((( INDIAINDIA ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( ((( Shillong ((((( Xundia ((( ((( Hai-tzu-hsin ((( Yongping ((( Xiangyun ((( ((( ((( Myitkyina ((( ((( ((( Heijing ((( Gaibanda NayaparaNayapara ((((( ((( (Sha-chiao(( ((( ((( ((( ((( Yipinglang ((( Baoshan TeknafTeknaf ButhidaungButhidaung (((TeknafTeknaf ((( ((( Nanjian ((( !! ((( Tengchong KanyinKanyin((( ChaungChaung !! Kunming ((( ((( ((( Anning ((( ((( ((( Changning MaungdawMaungdaw ((( MaungdawMaungdaw ((( ((( Imphal Mymensingh ((( ((( ((( ((( Jiuyingjiang ((( ((( Longling 000 202020 404040 BANGLADESHBANGLADESH((( 000 202020 404040 BANGLADESHBANGLADESH((( ((( ((( ((( ((( Yunxian ((( ((( ((( (((
    [Show full text]
  • TRENDS in MANDALAY Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN MANDALAY Photo credits Paul van Hoof Mithulina Chatterjee Myanmar Survey Research The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN MANDALAY UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 11 2. Methodology 14 2.1 Objectives 15 2.2 Research tools 15 3. Introduction to Mandalay region and participating townships 18 3.1 Socio-economic context 20 3.2 Demographics 22 3.3 Historical context 23 3.4 Governance institutions 26 3.5 Introduction to the three townships participating in the mapping 33 4. Governance at the frontline: Participation in planning, responsiveness for local service provision and accountability 38 4.1 Recent developments in Mandalay region from a citizen’s perspective 39 4.1.1 Citizens views on improvements in their village tract or ward 39 4.1.2 Citizens views on challenges in their village tract or ward 40 4.1.3 Perceptions on safety and security in Mandalay Region 43 4.2 Development planning and citizen participation 46 4.2.1 Planning, implementation and monitoring of development fund projects 48 4.2.2 Participation of citizens in decision-making regarding the utilisation of the development funds 52 4.3 Access to services 58 4.3.1 Basic healthcare service 62 4.3.2 Primary education 74 4.3.3 Drinking water 83 4.4 Information, transparency and accountability 94 4.4.1 Aspects of institutional and social accountability 95 4.4.2 Transparency and access to information 102 4.4.3 Civil society’s role in enhancing transparency and accountability 106 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6 Satellite Map of Proposed Project Site
    APPENDIX 6 SATELLITE MAP OF PROPOSED PROJECT SITE Hakha Township, Rim pi Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village A6-1 Falam Township, Webula Village Tract, Chin State Kim Mon Chaung Village A6-2 Webula Village Pa Mun Chaung Village Tedim Township, Dolluang Village Tract, Chin State Zo Zang Village Dolluang Village A6-3 Taunggyi Township, Kyauk Ni Village Tract, Shan State A6-4 Kalaw Township, Myin Ma Hti Village Tract and Baw Nin Village Tract, Shan State A6-5 Ywangan Township, Sat Chan Village Tract, Shan State A6-6 Pinlaung Township, Paw Yar Village Tract, Shan State A6-7 Symbol Water Supply Facility Well Development by the Procurement of Drilling Rig Nansang Township, Mat Mon Mun Village Tract, Shan State A6-8 Nansang Township, Hai Nar Gyi Village Tract, Shan State A6-9 Hopong Township, Nam Hkok Village Tract, Shan State A6-10 Hopong Township, Pawng Lin Village Tract, Shan State A6-11 Myaungmya Township, Moke Soe Kwin Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-12 Myaungmya Township, Shan Yae Kyaw Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-13 Labutta Township, Thin Gan Gyi Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Protection Dike Rainwater Pond (New) : 5 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) : 20 Facilities A6-14 Labutta Township, Laput Pyay Lae Pyauk Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-15 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road Irrigation Channel Rainwater Pond (New) : 2 Facilities Rainwater Pond (Existing) Hinthada Township, Tha Si Village Tract, Ayeyarwady Region A6-16 Symbol Facility Proposed Road Other Road
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Modern Burma Thant Myint-U Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521780217 - The Making of Modern Burma Thant Myint-U Index More information Index Abhisha Husseini, 51 and local rebellions, 172, 173–4, 176 Afghanistan, 8, 22, 98, 102, 162 and modern Burma, 254 agriculture, 36, 37, 40, 44, 47, 119, 120, payment of, 121 122, 167, 224, 225, 236, 239; see also reforms, 111–12 cultivators Assam, 2, 13, 15–16, 18, 19, 20, 95, 98, 99, Ahom dynasty, 15–16 220 Aitchison, Sir Charles, 190–1 athi, 33, 35 Alaungpaya, King, 13, 17, 58, 59–60, 61, Ava (city), 17, 25, 46, 53, 54 70, 81, 83, 90, 91, 107 population, 26, 54, 55 Alaungpaya dynasty, 59, 63, 161 Ava kingdom, 2 allodial land, 40, 41 administration, 28–9, 35–8, 40, 53–4, Alon, 26, 39, 68, 155, 173, 175 56–7, 62, 65–8, 69, 75–8, 108–9, Amarapura, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 26, 51, 53, 115–18, 158–60, 165–6 54, 119, 127, 149 anti-British attitudes, 6–7, 99, 101–3 rice prices, 143 and Bengal, 94, 95, 96, 98, 99–100 royal library, 96 boundaries of, 9, 12, 24–5, 92, 101, Amarapura, Myowun of, 104–5 220 Amherst, Lord, 106 British attitudes to, 6, 8–9, 120, 217–18, Amyint, 36, 38, 175 242, 246, 252 An Tu (U), 242 and Buddhism, 73–4, 94, 95, 96, 97, 108, Anglo-Burmese wars, 2, 79 148–52, 170–1 First (1824–6), 18–20, 25, 99, 220 ceremonies, 97, 149, 150 Second (1852–3), 23, 104, 126 and China, 47–8, 137, 138, 141, 142, Third (1885), 172, 176, 189, 191–3 143, 144, 147–8 animal welfare, 149, 171 chronicles of, 79–83, 86, 240 appanages, 29, 53, 61–3, 68, 69, 72–3, 77, and colonial state, 219–20 107, 108, 231 commercial concessions, 136–7 reform of,
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgments
    FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Acknowledgments Thisresearch study was led by U Kyaw Khine & Associates with the assistance of the field survey team of the FSWG members organizations. The research team would like to express sincere thanks to Dr Ohnmar Khaing (FSWG Coordinator), Dr. Min Ko Ko Maung, (Deputy Coordinator), and Mr. Thijs Wissink (Programme Advisor) for their kind and effective support for the research. The team is especially grateful to Daw Yi Yi Cho (M&E Officer) for providing logistical and technical support along with study design, data collection, analysis, and report writing. Finally, this research would not have been possible without the valuable participation and knowledge imparted by all the respondents from the villages of Pauktaw and Taungup Townships and focus group discussion (FGD) participants. The research team would like to acknowledge the experts and professors from respective institutions concerned with livestock who willingly agreed to take part in the FGDs. We are greatly indebted to them. 1 FACTORS AFFECTING COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE RURAL LIVESTOCK SECTOR Ensure adequate financial and human resources to village volunteers for veterinary extension services to cover all rural areas Upgrade local pig breeds with improved variety for better genetic performance in rural livestock production Attract private sector investment to finance all livestock support infrastructure, such as cold chain, cold storage, animal feed mills, veterinary drugs, and meat and
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar (Burma)
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Myanmar (Burma) Northern Myanmar p271 Mandalay & Around p234 Western ^# Myanmar Bagan & Eastern p307 Central Myanmar Myanmar p196 p141 Southwestern Myanmar ^# Yangon p86 p34 Southeastern Myanmar p105 Simon Richmond, David Eimer, Adam Karlin, Nick Ray, Regis St Louis PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to Myanmar . 4 YANGON . 34 Myeik . 131 Myanmar Map . 6 Myeik (Mergui) Archipelago . 135 Myanmar’s Top 10 . .8 SOUTHWESTERN Kawthoung . 138 MYANMAR . 86 Need to Know . 14 Thanlyin & Kyauktan . 87 What’s New . 16 BAGAN & CENTRAL Bago . 88 MYANMAR . 141 If You Like… . 17 Pathein . .. 94 Yangon–Mandalay Month by Month . 19 Chaung Tha Beach . .. 99 Highway . 143 Ngwe Saung Beach . 102 Itineraries . 21 Taungoo (Toungoo) . 143 Nay Pyi Taw . 146 Before You Go . 23 SOUTHEASTERN Meiktila . 149 Regions at a Glance . 30 MYANMAR . 105 Yangon–Bagan Mon State . 107 Highway . 151 2P2PLAY / SHUTTERSTOCK © SHUTTERSTOCK / 2P2PLAY Mt Kyaiktiyo Pyay . 151 (Golden Rock) . 107 Thayekhittaya Mawlamyine . 109 (Sri Ksetra) . 154 Around Mawlamyine . 116 Magwe . 155 Ye . 119 Bagan . 156 Kayin State . 121 Nyaung U . 158 Hpa-an . 121 Old Bagan . 164 Around Hpa-an . 124 Myinkaba . 167 Myawaddy . 126 New Bagan (Bagan Myothit) . 167 Tanintharyi Region . 127 Around Bagan . 172 STREET FOOD AT BOGYOKE AUNG Dawei . 127 SAN MARKET P54, YANGON CHANTAL DE BRUIJNE / SHUTTERSTOCK © SHUTTERSTOCK / BRUIJNE DE CHANTAL SHWE YAUNGHWE KYAUNG P197, NYAUNGSHWE Contents UNDERSTAND Mt Popa . 172 Mingun . 269 Myanmar Salay . 173 Paleik . 270 Today . 336 Pakokku . 175 History . 338 Monywa . 176 NORTHERN People & Religious Around Monywa . 178 MYANMAR . 271 Beliefs of Myanmar . 352 Mandalay to Lashio . 273 Aung San Suu Kyi .
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 October 26, 2009 Highly Repressive, Authoritarian Military Regimes Have Ruled the Country Since 1962
    Burma Page 1 of 12 Burma BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR International Religious Freedom Report 2009 October 26, 2009 Highly repressive, authoritarian military regimes have ruled the country since 1962. In May 2008 the Government announced voters had approved a new draft Constitution in a nationwide referendum. Democracy activists and the international community widely criticized the referendum as seriously flawed. The new Constitution provides for freedom of religion; however, it also grants broad exceptions that allow the regime to restrict those rights at will. Although authorities generally permitted most adherents of registered religious groups to worship as they choose, the Government imposed restrictions on certain religious activities and frequently abused the right to freedom of religion. There was no change in the Government’s limited degree of respect for religious freedom during the reporting period. Religious activities and organizations were subject to restrictions on freedom of expression, association, and assembly. The Government continued to monitor meetings and activities of virtually all organizations, including religious organizations. The Government continued to systematically restrict efforts by Buddhist clergy to promote human rights and political freedom. Many of the Buddhist monks arrested in the violent crackdown that followed pro-democracy demonstrations in September 2007, including prominent activist monk U Gambira, remained in prison serving long sentences. The Government also actively promoted Theravada Buddhism over other religions, particularly among members of ethnic minorities. Christian and Islamic groups continued to struggle to obtain permission to repair existing places of worship or build new ones. The regime continued to closely monitor Muslim activities. Restrictions on worship for other non-Buddhist minority groups also continued.
    [Show full text]
  • Second National Report on Unccd Implementation of the Union of Myanmar ( April 2002 )
    SECOND NATIONAL REPORT ON UNCCD IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR ( APRIL 2002 ) Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Background 3 3. The Strategies and Priorities Established within the Framework of 7 Sustainable Economic Development Plans 4. Institutional Measures Taken to Implement the Convention 9 5. Measures Taken or Planned to Combat Desertification 14 6. Consultative Process in Support of National Action Programme 52 with Interested Entities 7. Financial Allocation from the National Budgets 56 8. Monitoring and Evaluation 58 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The main purpose of this report is to update on the situation in Myanmar with regard to measures taken for the implementation of the UNCCD at the national level since its submission of the first national report in August 2000. 1.2 Myanmar acceded to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) in January 1997. Even before Myanmar’s accession to UNCCD, measures relating to combating desertification have been taken at the local and national levels. In 1994, the Ministry of Forestry (MOF) launched a 3-year "Greening Project for the Nine Critical Districts" of Sagaing, Magway and Mandalay Divisions in the Dry Zone. This was later extended to 13 districts with the creation of new department, the Dry Zone Greening Department (DZGD) in 1997. 1.3 The Government has stepped up its efforts on preventing land degradation and combating desertification in recent years. The most significant effort is the rural area development programme envisaged in the current Third Short-Term Five-Year Plan (2001-2002 to 2005-2006). The rural development programme has laid down 5 main activities.
    [Show full text]
  • English 2014
    The Border Consortium November 2014 PROTECTION AND SECURITY CONCERNS IN SOUTH EAST BURMA / MYANMAR With Field Assessments by: Committee for Internally Displaced Karen People (CIDKP) Human Rights Foundation of Monland (HURFOM) Karen Environment and Social Action Network (KESAN) Karen Human Rights Group (KHRG) Karen Offi ce of Relief and Development (KORD) Karen Women Organisation (KWO) Karenni Evergreen (KEG) Karenni Social Welfare and Development Centre (KSWDC) Karenni National Women’s Organization (KNWO) Mon Relief and Development Committee (MRDC) Shan State Development Foundation (SSDF) The Border Consortium (TBC) 12/5 Convent Road, Bangrak, Suite 307, 99-B Myay Nu Street, Sanchaung, Bangkok, Thailand. Yangon, Myanmar. E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.theborderconsortium.org Front cover photos: Farmers charged with tresspassing on their own lands at court, Hpruso, September 2014, KSWDC Training to survey customary lands, Dawei, July 2013, KESAN Tatmadaw soldier and bulldozer for road construction, Dawei, October 2013, CIDKP Printed by Wanida Press CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Context .................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Situation Update (10 to 16 May 2021)
    Myanmar Situation Update (10 to 16 May 2021) Summary: One hundred days after the coup, the junta has pushed the region’s fastest-growing economy into an economic and humanitarian disaster. The World Bank forecast shows that Myanmar's economy is expected to contract by 10% in 2021, a sharp difference from the previous prediction of 5.9% growth in October 2020. There is a possible banking crisis which leads to cash shortages, limited access to social welfare payments and international remittances. Last week, Myanmar Kyat hit one of its lowest compared to the USD. The World Food Program also estimates that up to 3.4 million more people, particularly those in urban areas, will face hunger during the next six months. Price rises, hurting the poor and causing shortages of some essentials, including the costs of fuel and medicine. The junta called to reopen colleges, universities and schools soon but many students and educators are boycotting. As a result, around 13,000 staff had been suspended by May 8. The junta also announced job vacancies for educational positions to replace striking staff. Across Myanmar, the ordinary citizens have taken up any weapons available from air guns to traditional firearms and homemade bombs and arms have spread in Chin state, Sagaing, Magwe and Mandalay regions. Mindat township in Chin State reported more intensified fights between the civil resistance groups and the Myanmar military while clashes were reported in Myingyan township, Mandalay region and Tamu township, Sagaing region. According to our information, at least 43 bomb blasts happened across Myanmar in the past week and many of them were in Yangon’s townships.
    [Show full text]