Regulars Features
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report. -
Toronto Has No History!’
‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY By Victoria Jane Freeman A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto ©Copyright by Victoria Jane Freeman 2010 ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ ABSTRACT ‘TORONTO HAS NO HISTORY!’ INDIGENEITY, SETTLER COLONIALISM AND HISTORICAL MEMORY IN CANADA’S LARGEST CITY Doctor of Philosophy 2010 Victoria Jane Freeman Graduate Department of History University of Toronto The Indigenous past is largely absent from settler representations of the history of the city of Toronto, Canada. Nineteenth and twentieth century historical chroniclers often downplayed the historic presence of the Mississaugas and their Indigenous predecessors by drawing on doctrines of terra nullius , ignoring the significance of the Toronto Purchase, and changing the city’s foundational story from the establishment of York in 1793 to the incorporation of the City of Toronto in 1834. These chroniclers usually assumed that “real Indians” and urban life were inimical. Often their representations implied that local Indigenous peoples had no significant history and thus the region had little or no history before the arrival of Europeans. Alternatively, narratives of ethical settler indigenization positioned the Indigenous past as the uncivilized starting point in a monological European theory of historical development. i i iii In many civic discourses, the city stood in for the nation as a symbol of its future, and national history stood in for the region’s local history. The national replaced ‘the Indigenous’ in an ideological process that peaked between the 1880s and the 1930s. -
Tommy Thompson Park Update
Attachment 3: City of Toronto Report for Action REPORT FOR ACTION Tommy Thompson Park Update Date: May 10, 2021 To: Infrastructure and Environment Committee From: Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Wards: Ward 14 - Toronto-Danforth SUMMARY Tommy Thompson Park (the Park) is the largest component of the broader Leslie Street Spit (the Spit), located at the base of Leslie Street where it meets the shore of Lake Ontario; all components of the Spit will ultimately be consolidated as Tommy Thompson Park (see Attachment 1). The Park is designated in the Official Plan as an Environmentally Significant Area and is recognized internationally as a Canadian Important Bird Area for supporting the conservation of birds and their habitat. The Park is owned by Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) and managed in partnership between TRCA and the City of Toronto. The Park demonstrates that nature can flourish in cities and contribute to the well-being of city residents; only minutes from downtown, the Park is an escape from the city, and a place to marvel at the force of nature. It is a pet-free urban wilderness that exists as the result of decades of careful management and stewardship of natural succession and habitat restoration processes by TRCA with the support of the City, community groups, and other partners. Its significant and diverse aquatic and terrestrial environments provide habitat for at-risk species who are otherwise challenged by the interrelated impacts of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation, urbanization and climate change. The Park's evolution into an urban wilderness can also be attributed to the work of advocacy groups like the Friends of the Spit, founded in 1977 by naturalists advocating for the Spit to grow naturally, without development and the privatization of uses. -
2016 Advertising Expenditure
ZB7.2 STAFF REPORT To: Board of Management From: Jennifer Tracey, Senior Director Marketing, Communications & Partnerships Subject: 2016 ADVERTISING EXPENDITURE Date: 2016-02-25 Summary: This report outlines the proposed media plan and expenditures related to the 2016 advertising campaign as provided for in the 2016 Operating Budget. The paid advertising will complement the public relations and event strategy to ensure we are reaching our target audiences in the Greater Toronto Area and beyond, and that we are communicating the right messages. Recommendations: It is recommended that the Board approve the following: 1. Expenditures to reimburse Public Inc. for any outsourced production costs related to advertising programs as required for the Toronto Zoo brand, not to exceed $229.0 thousand, plus HST; and, 2. Expenditures with ZenithOptimedia Canada Inc. for media purchases related to the 2015 advertising campaign, not to exceed $956.0 thousand, plus HST. Financial Impact: There are no financial implications related to approval of these recommendations as the related advertising expenditures are included in the Operating Budget for 2016. Background: The Toronto Zoo set out the following objectives which link directly to the goals in the recent Strategic Plan, to drive the Marketing, Communications & Partnerships planning for 2016: 1. Meet or exceed 1.325 million visitors with a positive net revenue; 2. Highlight the Zoo as a ‘must-see’, fun and engaging experience filled with discovery and learning for all ages with a particular focus on the successful conservation and breeding programs including the first giant panda cubs born in Canada; 2015 Advertising Expenditure 2015-02-04 Page 2 of 9 3. -
OPTION 3: SMALL WARDS TORONTO WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW Drawthelines.Ca
drawthelines.ca OPTION 3: SMALL WARDS TORONTO WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW STEELES STEELES STEELES ROUGE RIVER HUMBER RIVER BRANCH W 310 WILLOWDALE W 328 W 329 W 353 W 355 CUMMER 400 VICTORIA PARK PARK VICTORIA FINCH DUFFERIN HWY FINCH YONGE RR W 356 FINCH FINCH SENTINEL EDDYSTONE LESLIE KIPLING KIPLING W 309 GRANDRAVINE W 331 TAPSCOTT W 33 0 DON RIVER BRANCH W 327 WEST HIGHLAND MCLEVIN BIRCHMOUNT 427 SHEPPARD SHEPPARD SHEPPARD W 354 CREEK HWY HWY W 352 W 311 HWY 401 NEILSON W 301 W 302 HWY RR W 326 401 ROUGE RIVER BAYVIEW PKY JANE HWY 401 ALLEN W 333 DON RIVER DON VALLEY HUMBER RIVER W 325 MARKHAM BRANCH MORNINGSIDE BLACK CREEK W 332 W 334 W 351 W 358 W 312 RR W 357 W 313 DUFFERIN W 350 LAWRENCE DON RIVER BRANCH W 303 HUMBER DON RIVER BRANCH LAWRENCE CREEK LESLIE WEST HIGHLAND HWY 401 STAYNER W 324 W 349 CREEK EGLINTON YORK ROYAL HYDRO WEST HIGHLAND CREEK RR EGLINTON BROADWAY EGLINTON YONGE EGLINTON VICTORIA PARK PARK VICTORIA RR BELTLINE BRIMLEY W 305 W 314 W 323 W 336 W 335 EGLINTON OAKWOOD BAYVIEW W 348 RR NORTHLINE W 304 KIPLING ETOBICOKE CREEK MOORE DON RIVER RR RR W 347 ST CLAIR W 315 MASSEY RR W 345 ST CLAIR CREEK SPADINA W 337 RR W 344 HUMBER RIVER RR MIDLAND DAVENPORT BLOOR W 316 W 3 18 W 322 AVENUE RR KINGSTON BLOOR DANFORTH WOODBINE W 307 W 338 ROSEDALE VALLEY W 342 RR RR W 339 DON VALLEY W 346 W 317 W 340 W 343 W 306 PARKSIDE W 321 GREENWOOD QUEEN SHERBORNE DOVERCOURT UNIVERSITY ETOBICOKE CREEK PKY PARK VICTORIA KIPLING KIPLING GARDINER XY W 320 LESLIE RR RR FRONT W 341 W 3 19 YONGE The goal of the SMALL WARDS option is to keep wards within an average ward population size of 45,000 to W 308 55,000, thereby creating a larger number of small wards. -
Peer Review EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport BBTCA
Imagine the result Peer Review – EA Study Design Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) Runway Expansion and Introduction of Jet Aircraft Final Report August 2015 BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Background 1-1 1.2 Current Assignment 1-3 2.0 PEER REVIEW APPROACH 2-1 2.1 Methodology 2-1 3.0 FINDINGS OF PEER REVIEW OF AECOM’S DRAFT STUDY DESIGN REPORT 3-1 3.1 EA Process and Legislation 3-1 3.2 Public Consultation & Stakeholder Engagement 3-1 3.3 Air Quality 3-2 3.4 Public Health 3-5 3.5 Noise 3-6 3.6 Natural Environment 3-10 3.7 Socio-Economic Conditions 3-11 3.8 Land Use & Built Form 3-14 3.9 Marine Physical Conditions and Water Quality 3-15 3.10 Transportation 3-15 3.11 Archaeology & Cultural Heritage 3-18 4.0 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS 4-1 APPENDIX A Presentation Given to the Working Group (22 June 2015) B Presentation of Draft Phase I Peer Review Report Results (13 July 2015) i BBTCA Peer Review of EA Study Design Report ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AERMOD Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System ARCADIS ARCADIS Canada Inc. BBTCA Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport CALPUFF Meteorological and Air Quality Monitoring System CCG Canadian Coast Guard CEAA Canadian Environmental Assessment Act CO Carbon Monoxide COPA Canadian Owners and Pilots Association dBA Decibel Values of Sounds EA Environmental Assessment EC Environment Canada GBE Government Business Enterprise GWC Greater Waterfront Coalition HEAT Habitat and Environmental Assessment Tool INM Integrated Noise Model Ldn Day-Night -
Exhibition Place Master Plan – Phase 1 Proposals Report
Acknowledgments The site of Exhibition Place has had a long tradition as a gathering place. Given its location on the water, these lands would have attracted Indigenous populations before recorded history. We acknowledge that the land occupied by Exhibition Place is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples. We also acknowledge that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands. Figure 1. Moccasin Identifier engraving at Toronto Trillium Park The study team would like to thank City Planning Division Study Team Exhibition Place Lynda Macdonald, Director Don Boyle, Chief Executive Officer Nasim Adab Gilles Bouchard Tamara Anson-Cartwright Catherine de Nobriga Juliana Azem Ribeiro de Almeida Mark Goss Bryan Bowen Hardat Persaud David Brutto Tony Porter Brent Fairbairn Laura Purdy Christian Giles Debbie Sanderson Kevin Lee Kelvin Seow Liz McFarland Svetlana Lavrentieva Board of Governors Melanie Melnyk Tenants, Clients and Operators Dan Nicholson James Parakh David Stonehouse Brad Sunderland Nigel Tahair Alison Torrie-Lapaire 4 - PHASE 1 PROPOSALS REPORT FOR EXHIBITION PLACE Local Advisory Committee Technical Advisory Committee Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association Michelle Berquist - Transportation Planning The Bentway Swinzle Chauhan – Transportation Services -
Toronto Central Waterfront Public Forum #2
TORONTO CENTRAL WATERFRONT PUBLIC FORUM #2 Queens Quay Revitalization EA Bathurst Street to Lower Jarvis Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Schedule C) December 08, 2008 1 WATERFRONT TORONTO UPDATE 2 Central Waterfront International Design Competition 3 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 4 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 5 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 6 Waterfront Toronto Long Term Plan – Central Waterfront 7 East Bayfront Waters Edge Promenade: Design Underway 8 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 9 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 10 Spadina Wavedeck: Opened September 2008 Metropolis Article 11 Rees Wavedeck: Construction Underway 12 Simcoe Wavedeck: Construction Underway 13 Spadina Bridge: Construction Early-2009 14 What Have We Been Doing for the Past 11 Months? • Consider and follow up on comments from Public Forum 1 • Assess baseline technical feasibility of design alternatives – Over 90 meetings in total: • City and TTC technical staff • Partner agencies •Stakeholders • Landowners/Property Managers • Adjacent project efforts • Advanced transit and traffic modelling • Develop Alternative Design Concepts and Evaluation (Phase 3) • Coordination with East Bayfront Transit EA 15 Study Area: Revised 16 Overview • Review of EA Phases 1 & 2 from Public Forum #1: January 2008 • EA Phase 3: Alternative Design Alternatives – Long list of Design Alternatives – Evaluation of Design Alternatives • Next Steps – Evaluation Criteria for Shortlisted Design -
TRIPLE FLAG PRECIOUS METALS CORP. US$250,000,010 19,230,770 Common Shares
No securities regulatory authority has expressed an opinion about these securities and it is an offence to claim otherwise. This prospectus constitutes a public offering of these securities only in those jurisdictions where they may be lawfully offered for sale and therein only by persons permitted to sell such securities. These securities have not been, and will not be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘U.S. Securities Act’’), or the securities laws of any state of the United States (as such term is defined in Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act) and may not be offered, sold or delivered, directly or indirectly, in the United States, except pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable state securities laws. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy any of these securities in the United States. See ‘‘Plan of Distribution’’. SUPPLEMENTED PREP PROSPECTUS Initial Public Offering May 19, 2021 4NOV201908140987 TRIPLE FLAG PRECIOUS METALS CORP. US$250,000,010 19,230,770 Common Shares This prospectus qualifies the distribution in each of the provinces and territories of Canada of an aggregate of 19,230,770 common shares of Triple Flag Precious Metals Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’). The common shares are being offered in U.S. dollars, at a price of US$13.00 per common share, for gross proceeds of approximately US$250,000,000. We will use the net proceeds from this offering for the repayment of existing indebtedness. -
Natural Environment Report
Schedule ‘C’ Environmental Assessment for 16th Avenue between Yonge Street and Woodbine Avenue Appendix G Natural Environment Report Accessible formats are available upon request. NATURAL HERITAGE REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO 16TH AVENUE (Y.R.73) FROM YONGE STREET (Y.R. 1) TO WOODBINE AVENUE (Y.R. 8) YORK REGION SCHEDULE ‘C’ MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY prepared for: prepared by: NOVEMBER 2018 NATURAL HERITAGE REPORT IMPROVEMENTS TO 16TH AVENUE (Y.R.73) FROM YONGE STREET (Y.R. 1) TO WOODBINE AVENUE (Y.R. 8) YORK REGION SCHEDULE ‘C’ MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY prepared by: prepared by: LISA CATCHER, B.A. JUDSON VENIER, M.Sc. Botanist/Certified Arborist Senior Fisheries Biologist reviewed by: CONSTANCE J. AGNEW, B.Sc. Vice-President, Senior Planning Ecologist LGL Limited environmental research associates 22 Fisher Street, P.O. Box 280 King City, Ontario L7B 1A6 Tel: 905-833-1244 Fax: 905-833-1255 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.lgl.com NOVEMBER 2018 LGL Project # TA8627A Improvements to 16th Avenue – Yonge Street to Woodbine Avenue Natural Heritage Report Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Aquatic Habitats and Communities ............................................................................................................. 2 2.1.1 German Mills Creek ................................................................................................................................ -
Attachment 1 Summary of Procurements.Pdf
1 Attachment 1 ‐ Summary of Procurements Highest Ranked Goods/Services Contingency Total Cost (Before Total TRCA Division Project Name Awarded Bidder Contract Cost Responded Procured Cost Revisions) Vendors (Responsible) Engineering services for slope stability, erosion Eldorado Court, risk assessment, and Grandravine Drive and AECOM CANADA Restoration and alternative conceptual $225,489.00 $22,548.90 $248,037.90 11 5 Ladyshot Crescent, in the LTD. Infrastructure design for forty‐five (45) City of Toronto properties in the City of Toronto. Fill Quality Control, Site Decommissioning and 2019 laboratory Restoration and ALS Canada Ltd $49,300.00 $4,930.00 $54,230.00 4 3 Environmental Monitoring analytical services. Infrastructure Programs Professional engineering services for preliminary AMTEC Engineering Wiley Bridge design, detailed design $36,325.00 $5,448.75 $41,773.75 17 3 Corporate Services Ltd. and contract administration services. Pre‐construction and Upper Highland Creek Pan post‐construction CCTV Restoration and Andrews Engineer $33,274.00 $12,000.00 $45,274.00 12 1 Am Path Connection inspection services of Infrastructure sanitary infrastructure. Newtonbrook Creek Engineering services for AQUAFOR BEECH Restoration and Bridge Replacement Slope detailed designs for $35,800.00 $3,580.00 $39,380.00 7 2 LIMITED Infrastructure Stabilization Project slope stabilization. 2 Attachment 1 ‐ Summary of Procurements Highest Ranked Goods/Services Contingency Total Cost (Before Total TRCA Division Project Name Awarded Bidder Contract Cost Responded Procured Cost Revisions) Vendors (Responsible) Engineering services for Grey Abbey Ravine Slope AQUAFOR BEECH Restoration and development of detailed $59,160.00 $5,916.00 $65,076.00 5 1 Stabilization Project LIMITED Infrastructure designs. -
Sugar Wharf Is a Community of Extraordinary Proportions
A WHOLE NEW COMMUNITY From Humber Bay to the Eastern Beaches, Toronto’s magnificent waterfront spans 46 kms. Under the direction of Waterfront Toronto, this highly desirable section of the city is undergoing a sea change. Created by the federal and provincial government and the City of Toronto, Waterfront Toronto has the mandate to transform the area into a vibrant public and cultural space for all Torontonians. Unequalled in size, it’s one of the largest urban revitalization projects in the world. The total area for development is 800 hectars in size, and is one of the largest revitalization projects in the world! Collaborating with developers like Menkes, Waterfront Toronto aims to create 40,000 new residences and approximately 40,000 new jobs. With the introduction of mixed-used neighbourhoods, offices, expanding public transit, parks, and public spaces, the waterfront will be a coveted place to live, work, learn and play. By adopting an economically and environmentally sustainable design approach, this reimagination will change the face of Toronto and deliver a positive, meaningful relationship between the lake and the city. THE LAKE. THE LIFE. THE CITY. LAKE SHORE BLVD E NEW ST COOPER ST Rising on the shores of Toronto’s waterfront, Sugar Wharf is a community of extraordinary proportions. FREELAND ST Striking the perfect work-life balance, this exceptional development will be the future-forward ideal today’s urban population seeks. Home to 7,500 residents, and 4,000 HARBOUR ST office workers once completed, this 11.5-acre community RETAIL PROMENADE offers homes, offices, shops, restaurants, school, daycare, park and more.