OPTION 3: SMALL WARDS TORONTO WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW Drawthelines.Ca
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
drawthelines.ca OPTION 3: SMALL WARDS TORONTO WARD BOUNDARY REVIEW STEELES STEELES STEELES ROUGE RIVER HUMBER RIVER BRANCH W 310 WILLOWDALE W 328 W 329 W 353 W 355 CUMMER 400 VICTORIA PARK PARK VICTORIA FINCH DUFFERIN HWY FINCH YONGE RR W 356 FINCH FINCH SENTINEL EDDYSTONE LESLIE KIPLING KIPLING W 309 GRANDRAVINE W 331 TAPSCOTT W 33 0 DON RIVER BRANCH W 327 WEST HIGHLAND MCLEVIN BIRCHMOUNT 427 SHEPPARD SHEPPARD SHEPPARD W 354 CREEK HWY HWY W 352 W 311 HWY 401 NEILSON W 301 W 302 HWY RR W 326 401 ROUGE RIVER BAYVIEW PKY JANE HWY 401 ALLEN W 333 DON RIVER DON VALLEY HUMBER RIVER W 325 MARKHAM BRANCH MORNINGSIDE BLACK CREEK W 332 W 334 W 351 W 358 W 312 RR W 357 W 313 DUFFERIN W 350 LAWRENCE DON RIVER BRANCH W 303 HUMBER DON RIVER BRANCH LAWRENCE CREEK LESLIE WEST HIGHLAND HWY 401 STAYNER W 324 W 349 CREEK EGLINTON YORK ROYAL HYDRO WEST HIGHLAND CREEK RR EGLINTON BROADWAY EGLINTON YONGE EGLINTON VICTORIA PARK PARK VICTORIA RR BELTLINE BRIMLEY W 305 W 314 W 323 W 336 W 335 EGLINTON OAKWOOD BAYVIEW W 348 RR NORTHLINE W 304 KIPLING ETOBICOKE CREEK MOORE DON RIVER RR RR W 347 ST CLAIR W 315 MASSEY RR W 345 ST CLAIR CREEK SPADINA W 337 RR W 344 HUMBER RIVER RR MIDLAND DAVENPORT BLOOR W 316 W 3 18 W 322 AVENUE RR KINGSTON BLOOR DANFORTH WOODBINE W 307 W 338 ROSEDALE VALLEY W 342 RR RR W 339 DON VALLEY W 346 W 317 W 340 W 343 W 306 PARKSIDE W 321 GREENWOOD QUEEN SHERBORNE DOVERCOURT UNIVERSITY ETOBICOKE CREEK PKY PARK VICTORIA KIPLING KIPLING GARDINER XY W 320 LESLIE RR RR FRONT W 341 W 3 19 YONGE The goal of the SMALL WARDS option is to keep wards within an average ward population size of 45,000 to W 308 55,000, thereby creating a larger number of small wards. During the Round One public consultation phase there was ample support for small wards to W 319 warrant the development of this option. Many people NUMBER OF WARDS believe that smaller wards improve citizen access and 58 the Councillors' capacity to represent their constituents. This option results in 58 wards. Most of AVG WARD SIZE the increase comes from reducing the size of large RIVER AND STREAMS GREENSPACE wards. Only 1 ward needs to be increased in size. In 2026, 51 of the 58 wards fall within the 10% variance RAILWAY (RR) WARD BOUNDARY factor and 4 within the 10% - 15% variance factor in this ROADS 50,000 option. Of the three wards above the 15% variance factor, two are above it by less than one half a percent. One ward is 17% above the average ward population in N POPULATION RANGE 2026. However, this ward is a very stable and 0 2.5 5 10 Km 45,000 - 55,000 (+/-10%) homogeneous ward..