POLITENESS and MULTIMODALITY in KOREAN and JAPANESE by HYUN JI KIM a DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of East Asian Lang
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
POLITENESS AND MULTIMODALITY IN KOREAN AND JAPANESE by HYUN JI KIM A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Hyun Ji Kim Title: Politeness and Multimodality in Korean and Japanese This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of East Asian Linguistics degree in the East Asian Languages and Literatures by: Lucien Brown Co-Chairperson Kaori Idemaru Co-Chairperson Lucien Brown Advisor Zhuo Jing-Schmidt Core Member Eric Pederson Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded March 2020 ii © 2020 Hyun Ji Kim This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Hyun Ji Kim Doctor of Philosophy Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures March 2020 Title: Politeness and Multimodality in Korean and Japanese This dissertation work aims to explore multimodal strategies of politeness in Korean and Japanese by investigating 7 hours of spoken and visual data produced by Korean and Japanese speakers. The analysis particularly deals with ways of controlling density of lexical information, use of kinetic cues and manipulation of gestural space in deferential and non-deferential situations. To begin, the first study examines how speech in interactions with a status-superior and a status-equal differ in the quantity of honorific lexemes, honorific sentence-ending particles, formal case-marking particles, mimetics, Chinese-origin words, pronouns, fillers and backchannels. Statistical tests revealed that use of honorifics and other lexical items that are related to formality and politeness increase in deferential situations. On the other hands, the general quantity of lexical information given to the addressee did not significantly differ in deferential and non- deferential situations. Second, in the study on kinetic cues of politeness, it was found that deference and intimacy can be embedded by manipulating multiple types of nonverbal iv behavior involving manual gesture, head movements (nodding and shaking), erect body posture, eye contact and self-touch by looking at the frequency in formal and informal situations. In general, both native speakers of Korean and Japanese more actively and animatedly moved their bodies in intimate situations compared to deferential situations. An additional analysis further revealed that Korean and Japanese speakers use smaller gestural space to produce manual gestures when interacting with a superior than when interacting with a friend. In conclusion, this study contributes to developing methodological approaches of research on politeness by demonstrating that politeness- related verbal and nonverbal behaviors can be quantitatively examined. Furthermore, the statistical results indicating particular verbal and nonverbal patterns of (im)politeness support the perspective that politeness is a social practice of members of a community that share similar moral orders. Lastly, the findings that show how (im)politeness is complicatedly expressed in verbal and nonverbal ways can also have significant educational implications in that this research has brought to the forefront the issues in classes of Korean and Japanese where the focus of (im)politeness instruction has been placed mainly on honorifics rather than the true multimodality of (im)politeness. v CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Hyun Ji Kim GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University of Oregon, Eugene Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor of East Asian Linguistics, 2020, University of Oregon AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: Sociopragmatics Politeness Second Language Acquisition PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Graduate Employee, Department of East Asian Languages and Literatures, University of Oregon, 2015-2020 vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express sincere appreciation to Professors Lucien Brown and Kaori Idemaru for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. I also want to thank the members of the community councils for their valuable input. vii I dedicate this dissertation to my beloved family for nursing my soul with unconditional affections and love. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 II. REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON POLITENESS ...................................................... 5 2.1. Prior Research on Politeness ........................................................................... 5 2.1.1. First-wave Approach .............................................................................. 6 2.1.1.1. Cooperative Principle (CP) ........................................................... 6 2.1.1.2. Rationality and Face ..................................................................... 7 2.1.1.3. Universality versus Culture-specific ............................................. 8 2.1.1.4. Elicited Data and Utterance-level Analysis .................................. 10 2.1.1.5. Observer Coding ........................................................................... 11 2.1.2. Second-wave Approach ......................................................................... 11 2.1.2.1. First and Second-order Politeness ................................................. 12 2.1.2.2. Beyond Culture as the Unit of Analysis ....................................... 13 2.1.2.3. Challenge to the Notion of Face ................................................... 15 2.1.2.4. Naturally Occurring Interactions .................................................. 15 2.1.3. Third-wave Approach ............................................................................ 17 ix Chapter Page 2.1.3.1. Politeness and Interpersonal Evaluation ....................................... 18 2.1.3.2. Politeness and Social Practice ....................................................... 20 2.1.3.3. Multimodality of Politeness .......................................................... 21 2.2. Research on Japanese and Korean Politeness ................................................. 22 2.2.1. Concept of Politeness in Japanese and Korean .................................... 22 2.2.2. Honorifics ............................................................................................ 24 2.2.2.1. Korean Honorific System ............................................................. 24 2.2.2.2. Japanese Honorific System ........................................................... 26 2.2.2.3. Speech Style Shifting .................................................................... 27 2.2.3. Prior Research on Multimodal Polite Expressions in Korean and Japanese .............................................................................................. 29 2.2.4. Indexicality .......................................................................................... 31 III. GENERAL METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 34 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 34 3.2. Data Collection ............................................................................................... 34 3.2.1. Korean Data ........................................................................................... 34 3.2.2. Japanese Data ......................................................................................... 38 3.3. Analysis........................................................................................................... 40 x Chapter Page 3.4. Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 42 IV. LEXICAL INFORMATION AND POLITENESS .............................................. 44 4.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 44 4.2. Methodology ................................................................................................... 45 4.2.1. Analysis.................................................................................................. 46 4.2.2. Hypothesis.............................................................................................. 49 4.3. Results ............................................................................................................. 50 4.3.1. Korean ................................................................................................. 50 4.3.1.1. General Results ............................................................................. 50 4.3.1.2. Effect of Task ................................................................................ 52 4.3.2. Japanese ................................................................................................ 54 4.3.2.1. General Results ............................................................................. 54 4.3.2.2. Effect of Task ................................................................................ 56 4.3.3. Cross-cultural Comparison .................................................................... 58 4.4. Discussion