American Armies and Battlefields in Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Armies and Battlefields in Europe Chapter x OPERATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY IN THE WORLD W AR HE information given in this chapter of shipping a month, which was much is based upon data furnished officially greater than the rate of replacement. T by the Secretary of the Navy. The task facing the American N avy When the United States entered the was one of tremendous difficulty. It war the Allied N avies appeared to be had to assist as soon as possible in coun- lacking in effective means for combating teracting the submarine menace and in the German submarines which had started addition had to organize means of pro- a campaign of unrestricted warfare two viding passage across the Atlantic for months previously. It was extremely hundreds of thousands of American important, therefore, that immediate troops and enormous quantities of supplies. German Submarine U- 58 Surrendering to United States Destroyers Fanning and Nicholson, November 1917 American naval assistance be furnished Action against submarines was initiated to aid them in meeting the crisis. at once by dispatching to Europe the Admiral William S. Sims, who was limited number of destroyers then avail- to become Commander-in-Chief of the able. These were augmented by con- United States Naval Forces in European verted yachts, gunboats, small cruisers waters, landed in England shortly after and revenue cutters, and immediate steps America's entry into the war and estab- were taken to build additional destroyers. lished bis headquarters at London. He The first fighting unit of the American was at once informed by the British N avy to arrive in European waters was a authorities that if lasses due to hostile detachment of six destroyers which, on submarines were not checked quickly the May 4, 1917, steamed into the harbor at Allies would probably be defeated, as Queenstown, Ireland, where a main base they were then losing about 800,000 tons was established. This force was soon (449) 450 OPERATIONS OF UNITED STATES N AVY IN WORLD WAR increased to 34 destroyers. A main base the war the Cruiser and Transport Force was later established at Brest, and the was organized to carry American troops force operating from there gradually overseas. The few suitable vessels avail- grew in size until it approximated that able were taken over by the Government of Queenstown. A third main base at once and the German liners interned American Naval Activities in European Waters Naval Headquarters Sub·Chaser Base Air Force Main Base, Destroyers, etc. () Battleships Mine Barrage Minar Base œ Submarines + Mine Base was established at Gibraltar. Secondary in American ports were later added to bases were established along the Bay of this fleet. Every effort was made Biscay and at various other places along throughout the war to obtain additional the European and Mediterranean coast. ships for this service, which carried a Soon after the United States entered total of 911,000 men to Europe, or a little less than half of the number sent. Most of the remainder were transported in ships under British control. To guard against submarine attack, American transports making the trip to Europe were, as far as practicable, gathered into groups and escorted through the danger zone by destroyers and other armed vessels. This method of combat- ing the submarine menace was most suc- cessful and the results obtained were re- markable. Not a single vessel of the Cruiser and Transport Force was lost on the eastward voyage, although three Stern of Des troyer Showing 4-Inch Gun and ships returning to the United States were Depth Bombs Used Agains t Submarines sunk out of a total of five torpedoed. Nearly all the troops who crossed the Atlantic in American and French ships landed at French ports, while those going in other vessels landed in England. This necessitated the establishment of a small transport force of American ships at Southampton, the chief port used for reembarkation to France, in order to aug- ment the British cross-channel service. As the number of troops overseas in- creased, the task of supplying them be- came more difficult. This problem was met by the formation of the Naval Over- seas Transportation Service, which was a force distinct from the troop transport organization. It developed into a fleet of more than 400 vessels, manned by ap- proximately 4,500 officers and 29,000 men. To form this great organization it was Explosion of a 300-Pound Depth Bomb Dropped necessary to take vessels from every by a United States Destroyer, May 18, 19l 8 available source, and included in it were ships taken over from the Shipping Board, new tonnage resulting from the intensive building program of the Emer- gency Fleet Corporation, and a number of ships which were brought from the Great Lakes under considerable difficul- ties. The convoy system was also used insofar as possible in the operation of this fleet, and only seven vessels were lost by enemy action. This was considered an exceptionally fine record. As soon as the safety of the transports and supply ships had been reasonably assured, aggressive steps were taken against enemy submarines. This was ( 451 ) Oil Patch Indicating a "Hit" With a Depth Bomb United States Naval Vessels With Captive Balloon in Tow The ba11oon was used in searching for German submarines done by the laying of mine barrages, have been put out of action either by the employment of a hunting force cf being sunk or considerably damaged. small ships, supplemented by aircraft, Plans were also made for placing mine and the use of submarines. barrages in other areas, and a mine base Before America's entry into the war was planned at Bizerta, Tunis, from where the British had considered closing the operations were to be conducted in the northern entrance to the N crth Sea by Adriatic and Aegean Seas, but the signing placing a mine barrage from Scotland to of the Armistice halted the undertaking. N orway, but had given up this idea as In order to establish a large and effec- impracticable. The American naval au- tive hunting force of surface vessels, con- thorities felt, however, that with a new struction was undertaken in America of type of mine which had been developed several hundred boats called "submarine in the United States this scheme could be chasers". These were small wooden ves- undertaken successfully. In October sels, 110 feet long, powered by gasoline 1917 it was decided to make the attempt, motors, and equipped with sound-detect- in conjunction with the British, and the ing devices. A force of 135 of these ves- construction of mines was begun in the sels was sent to Europe. Most of them United States. The total length of the based at Plymouth, England, Queens- mine barrage to be put down was 270 town, Ireland, and Corfu, Greece, and miles, and the estimated number of were very effective in the protection of mines required was about 75,000. Bases merchant shipping. During the period were established on the eastern coast of of operation of the Plymouth detachment Scotland, necessary vessels were procured between Start Point and Lizard Head not and equipped, and in March 1918 opera- a single merchant vessel was lost in its tions were begun by the British and in area as a result of German submarine June by the United States. By the time attacks. A detachment from the Corfu hostilities ceased the British had placed group sailed from Brindisi, Italy, with approximately 14,000 mines and the the Allied fleet and participated with it Americans 56,000, as a result of which 12 in the attack on the Austrian port of enemy submarines are known definitely to Durazzo, doing especially valuable work (452) OPERATIONS OF UNITED STATES NAVY IN WORLD WAR 453 in screening the larger vessels of the fleet During the early days of America's from attack by Austrian submarines. effort there appeared to be no necessity In June 1917 a small detachment of the for dispatching any great portion of ber Naval Air Service arrived in Europe and battle fleet to European waters. There- soon thereafter the establishment of avia- fore, except for two divisions, it remained tion bases was begun along the French, on the American side of the Atlantic, English and Italian coasts in order to where it was engaged principally in train- assist in the escort of shipping. At the ing the large numbers of recruits taken signing of the Armistice this force had into the N avy during the war. developed into an organization of approx- Of the two divisions of battleships sent imately 19,000 officers and enlisted men, to Europe, one, comprising four vessels operating from 27 bases. later increased to five, joined the British T he operations of this force against at Scapa Flow in December 1917, there- hostile craft at sea were very successful. after participating in operations of the With its growth, plans were made for Grand Fleet. The other division of offensive action against the submarines three battleships took station in 1918 at at their bases, and eight squadrons, based Berehaven, from where it was to operate near Calais and Dunkirk, frequently against any enemy raiding cruisers that bombed the Belgian ports of Zeebruge, might break through the cordon drawn Ostend and Bruges until they were freed around the German coast. in the autumn of 1918 by the attacks of Aside from the foregoing purely naval the Allied Armies. Until the cessation of operations, a brigade of marines served hostilities the American naval air units as part of the 2d Division, and five 14-inch also helped the Royal Air Force by operat- naval guns on railroad mounts, manned ing against objectives which aided the by naval personnel, operated along the advance of the northern British Armies.
Recommended publications
  • Navy Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 14, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Navy’s Columbia (SSBN-826) class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new SSBNs to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. Since 2013, the Navy has consistently identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy procured the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021 and wants to procure the second boat in the class in FY2024. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $3,003.0 (i.e., $3.0 billion) in procurement funding for the first Columbia-class boat and $1,644.0 million (i.e., about $1.6 billion) in advance procurement (AP) funding for the second boat, for a combined FY2022 procurement and AP funding request of $4,647.0 million (i.e., about $4.6 billion). The Navy’s FY2022 budget submission estimates the procurement cost of the first Columbia- class boat at $15,030.5 million (i.e., about $15.0 billion) in then-year dollars, including $6,557.6 million (i.e., about $6.60 billion) in costs for plans, meaning (essentially) the detail design/nonrecurring engineering (DD/NRE) costs for the Columbia class. (It is a long-standing Navy budgetary practice to incorporate the DD/NRE costs for a new class of ship into the total procurement cost of the first ship in the class.) Excluding costs for plans, the estimated hands-on construction cost of the first ship is $8,473.0 million (i.e., about $8.5 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-20-257T, Navy Maintenance
    United States Government Accountability Office Testimony Before the Subcommittees on Seapower and Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate For Release on Delivery Expected at 10:00 a.m. ET Wednesday, December 4, 2019 NAVY MAINTENANCE Persistent and Substantial Ship and Submarine Maintenance Delays Hinder Efforts to Rebuild Readiness Statement of Diana C. Maurer Director Defense Capabilities and Management GAO-20-257T December 4, 2019 NAVY MAINTENANCE Persistent and Substantial Ship and Submarine Maintenance Delays Hinder Efforts to Rebuild Readiness Highlights of GAO-20-257T, a testimony before the Subcommittees on Seapower and Readiness and Management Support, Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The 2018 National Defense Strategy The Navy continues to face persistent and substantial maintenance delays that emphasizes that restoring and retaining affect the majority of its maintenance efforts and hinder its attempts to restore readiness is critical to success in the readiness. From fiscal year 2014 to the end of fiscal year 2019, Navy ships have emerging security environment. The spent over 33,700 more days in maintenance than expected. The Navy was Navy is working to rebuild its readiness unable to complete scheduled ship maintenance on time for about 75 percent of while also growing and modernizing its the maintenance periods conducted during fiscal years 2014 through 2019, with aging fleet of ships. A critical component more than half of the delays in fiscal year 2019 exceeding 90 days. When of rebuilding Navy readiness is maintenance is not completed on time, fewer ships are available for training or implementing sustainable operational operations, which can hinder readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A. Navy Activity Descriptions
    Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 APPENDIX A Navy Activity Descriptions Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A Navy Activity Descriptions Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Draft EIS/OEIS June 2017 Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing TABLE OF CONTENTS A. NAVY ACTIVITY DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................ A-1 A.1 Description of Sonar, Munitions, Targets, and Other Systems Employed in Atlantic Fleet Training and Testing Events .................................................................. A-1 A.1.1 Sonar Systems and Other Acoustic Sources ......................................................... A-1 A.1.2 Munitions .............................................................................................................. A-7 A.1.3 Targets ................................................................................................................ A-11 A.1.4 Defensive Countermeasures ............................................................................... A-13 A.1.5 Mine Warfare Systems ........................................................................................ A-13 A.1.6 Military Expended Materials ............................................................................... A-16 A.2 Training Activities ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Clemens Sea Scouts and SC
    Mount Clemens Public Library Local History Sketches The Mount Clemens Sea Scouts and Sub-Chaser SC-227 (©2008 by Mount Clemens Public Library. All rights reserved.) Photo courtesy of The Macomb Daily uring the summer of 1927, Mount Clemens became home port to a World War I submarine chaser, Dand some local boys had the adventure of a lifetime while bringing the ship to town. When the Boy Scouts of America offered a program called Sea Scouts, designed for older boys, the Macomb County Boy Scout Council organized a Sea Scout unit in Mount Clemens under the direction of naval reserve commander William J. Marshall. Commander Marshall used his influence with the Navy to arrange the purchase of a decommissioned submarine chaser, hull number SC-227, for use as a training ship for the Mount Clemens Sea Scouts. Marshall organized a group of community leaders as the Mount Clemens Yacht Club, which paid the $1000 purchase price and turned the vessel over to the Sea Scouts. In exchange, each member of the Yacht Club was a shareholder in the ship and guaranteed at least one trip per season aboard the SC-227. The Mount Clemens Sea Scouts, under Commander Marshall, left Mount Clemens for Washington D.C. by bus on June 30, 1927. The bus was provided by the Mount Clemens Yacht Club to transport the boys to the Washington Navy Yard, where the ship awaited them. Sea Scouts making the trip were Emory Nunneley, Jr., Philip Lutes, Carl Hirt, William Koehler, Russell Rooney, Donald Hatzenbuhler, William Elkin, Donald Stuart, Roy Martin, and James Nunneley.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of the Navy's New Frigate
    OCTOBER 2020 The Cost of the Navy’s New Frigate On April 30, 2020, the Navy awarded Fincantieri Several factors support the Navy’s estimate: Marinette Marine a contract to build the Navy’s new sur- face combatant, a guided missile frigate long designated • The FFG(X) is based on a design that has been in as FFG(X).1 The contract guarantees that Fincantieri will production for many years. build the lead ship (the first ship designed for a class) and gives the Navy options to build as many as nine addi- • Little if any new technology is being developed for it. tional ships. In this report, the Congressional Budget Office examines the potential costs if the Navy exercises • The contractor is an experienced builder of small all of those options. surface combatants. • CBO estimates the cost of the 10 FFG(X) ships • An independent estimate within the Department of would be $12.3 billion in 2020 (inflation-adjusted) Defense (DoD) was lower than the Navy’s estimate. dollars, about $1.2 billion per ship, on the basis of its own weight-based cost model. That amount is Other factors suggest the Navy’s estimate is too low: 40 percent more than the Navy’s estimate. • The costs of all surface combatants since 1970, as • The Navy estimates that the 10 ships would measured per thousand tons, were higher. cost $8.7 billion in 2020 dollars, an average of $870 million per ship. • Historically the Navy has almost always underestimated the cost of the lead ship, and a more • If the Navy’s estimate turns out to be accurate, expensive lead ship generally results in higher costs the FFG(X) would be the least expensive surface for the follow-on ships.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine and the Washington Conference Of
    477 THE SUBMARINE AND THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE OF 1921 Lawrence H. Douglas Following the First World War, the tation of this group, simply stated, was tide of public opinion was overwhelm­ that second best in naval strength meant ingly against the submarine as a weapon last. A policy of naval superiority was of war. The excesses of the German necessary, they felt, for "history consis­ U-boat had stunned the sensibilities of tently shows that war between no two the world but had, nonetheless, pre­ peoples or nations can be unthink­ sented new ideas and possibilities of this able.,,1 A second group, the Naval weapon to the various naval powers of Advisory Committee (Admirals Pratt the time. The momentum of these new and Coontz and Assistant Secretary of ideas proved so strong that by the the Navy Theodore Roosevelt, Jr.) also opening of the first major international submitted recommendations concerning disarmament conference of the 20th the limitation of naval armaments. century, practical uses of the submarine From the outset their deliberations were had all but smothered the moral indig­ guided by a concern that had become nation of 1918. more and more apparent-the threat Several months prior to the opening posed to the security and interests of of the conference, the General Board of this country by Japan. This concern was the American Navy was given the task evidenced in an attempt to gain basic of developing guidelines and recommen­ understandings with Britain. dations to be used by the State Depart­ The submarine received its share of ment in determining the American attention in the deliberations of these proposals to be presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Submarine Warfare Today
    Jacobson 205 Chapter VIII The Law of Submarine Warfare Today by Jon L. Jacobson* Introduction he roles of military submarines have evolved throughout the twentieth T century. In wartime, these roles have included coastal defense, harassment of enemy fleets, and, especially in World War II, hunting and destroying the seaborne commerce that supported the enemy's war efforts. Today, two principal roles for u.s. submarines, at least in any future war with the Soviet Union, are probably as anti-submarine weapons (attack submarines) and as strategic weapons platforms (ballistic missile submarines). Other missions, however, could include coastal defense, attacks on the enemy's surface fleet, projection of force ashore, and commerce warfare.1 The laws of war have never been comfortable with the submarine's unique combination of stealth and vulnerability. As will be explained below, it is this peculiar mix of strength and weakness that can be blamed as the root cause of the legal dilemma, particularly as it relates to the submarine's role as a commerce raider. The legal responses to this twentieth-century weapons platform have ranged from early proposals for its abolition to justification of its use under the rules of reprisal to tolerance of it as an effective war machine with characteristics that regrettably require some adjustments in the traditional laws of war. The U.s. Navy's new Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP 9) includes references to the laws of naval warfare that specifically address the submarine weapons system and also rules that apply, or can apply, to submarines and their roles in wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: Ex- USS Pigeon (ASR-21)
    NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: ex- USS Pigeon (ASR-21) USS Pigeon (ASR-21) underway. Pigeon was the first of two catamaran-hulled SRVs. Location and date are unknown. http://www.navsource.org/archives/09/32/3221.htm Vessel History The USS Pigeon (ASR-21) was the first of two catamaran-hulled submarine rescue vessels commissioned by the U.S. Navy in 1973. Alabama Drydock and Shipbuilding Company in Mobile, Alabama won the construction contract on November 15, 1967. Its keel was laid on July 17, 1968 and it was launched on August 13, 1969. Pigeon was commissioned on April 28, 1973. It was the navy’s third vessel that carried the name. Pigeon was assigned to the U.S. Navy’s Pacific Fleet, spending most of its career homeported at Naval Base San Diego. Its sistership, the USS Ortolan (ASR-22) was assigned to the U.S. Navy’s Atlantic Fleet in Norfolk, Virginia. The Pigeon spent the next two decades in readiness for the submarine disaster that fortunately never occurred. It spent frequent periods at sea conducting drills and training, including general training in saturation diving. The Pigeon successfully performed the navy’s first open ocean working saturation dive when it recovered the engine and ejection seat of an F-14 jet fighter that had crashed in 730 feet of water. The construction and design of the ships were a result of the loss of the nuclear-submarine USS Thresher (SSN-593) in the deep waters of the North Atlantic in April 1963, and the subsequent loss of a hydrogen bomb in the western Mediterranean off of Spain’s coast in January 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHUR EMIL HENRIKSEN One of the Positions on the Boat, So Perhaps He Had Training in That Area
    near the Great Lakes. It is not known if he MILITARY HISTORY OF had additional training for a specific job, but it is very likely. After the war he worked the rest of his life as a machinist, which was ARTHUR EMIL HENRIKSEN one of the positions on the boat, so perhaps he had training in that area. When Art joined the Navy, much of the world had already been at war for 4 years in st On June 29, 1943, 8 ½ months after his a battle that began in Europe on the 1 of enlistment, he was assigned to the new December 1939. boat, PC-1262, along with 58 other crewmembers, which was commissioned in The USA had entered WWII on 7 Dec 1941, New Orleans, LA. as result of the bombing of Pearl Harbor. On the 19 of December, 12 days later, a The PC-1262 was a ship built by Leathem draft was enacted that required all males D Smith Shipbuilding in Sturgeon Bay, from age 18-64 be registered. One year WI. Many of the PC’s were built in an later, on December 5, 1942, a drawing was assembly line, which allowed them to be held to determine the order that people who completed in about 1 week. Even so, though had not previously joined the armed forces, each PC was similar to the others, each was would be called up. an individual, and not a clone of another. A PC, or “Patrol Craft,” was 1/10 the size of a Art worked on his parent’s family farm near destroyer and could maneuver more quickly Dike, Iowa as a laborer, working 60 hours a and with its shallow draft (6 feet 2.5 inches), week with his brother Harry Henriksen and it functioned easily in as little as 10 feet of might have been considered exempt from water, allowing it to pass into much tighter military service.
    [Show full text]
  • Submarine Rescue Capability and Its Challenges
    X Submarine Rescue Capability and its Challenges 41496_DSTA 4-15#150Q.indd 1 5/6/10 1:08 AM ABSTRACT Providing rescue to the crew of a disabled submarine is of paramount concern to many submarine-operating nations. Various rescue systems are in operation around the world. In 2007, the Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) acquired a rescue service through a Public–Private Partnership. With a locally based solution to achieve this time-critical mission, the rescue capability of the RSN has been greatly enhanced. Dr Koh Hock Seng Chew Yixin Ng Xinyun 41496_DSTA 4-15#150Q.indd 2 5/6/10 1:08 AM Submarine Rescue Capability and its Challenges 6 “…[The] disaster was to hand Lloyd B. Maness INTRODUCTION a cruel duty. He was nearest the hatch which separated the flooding sections from the On Tuesday 23 May 1939, USS Squalus, the dry area. If he didn’t slam shut that heavy newest fleet-type submarine at that time metal door everybody on board might perish. for the US Navy, was sailing out of the Maness waited until the last possible moment, Portsmouth Navy Yard for her 19th test dive permitting the passage of a few men soaked in the ocean. This was an important trial for by the incoming sea water. Then, as water the submarine before it could be deemed poured through the hatchway… he slammed seaworthy to join the fleet. USS Squalus was shut the door on the fate of those men aft.” required to complete an emergency battle descent – a ‘crash test’ – by dropping to a The Register Guard, 24 May 1964 periscope depth of 50 feet (about 15 metres) within a minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Cards for the Game BATTLESHIPS!
    Ship cards for the Game BATTLESHIPS! http://scouter.wikidot.com/game-battleships BLUE SUBMARINE BLUE SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship BLUE SUBMARINE BLUE SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship BLUE SUBMARINE BLUE SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship BLUE DESTROYER BLUE DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine BLUE DESTROYER BLUE DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine BLUE BATTLESHIP BLUE BATTLESHIP Battleship sinks Destroyer Battleship sinks Destroyer Ship cards for the Game BATTLESHIPS! http://scouter.wikidot.com/game-battleships RED SUBMARINE RED SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship RED SUBMARINE RED SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship RED SUBMARINE RED SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship RED DESTROYER RED DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine RED DESTROYER RED DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine RED BATTLESHIP RED BATTLESHIP Battleship sinks Destroyer Battleship sinks Destroyer Ship cards for the Game BATTLESHIPS! http://scouter.wikidot.com/game-battleships YELLOW SUBMARINE YELLOW SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship YELLOW SUBMARINE YELLOW SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship YELLOW SUBMARINE YELLOW SUBMARINE Submarine sinks Battleship Submarine sinks Battleship YELLOW DESTROYER YELLOW DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine YELLOW DESTROYER YELLOW DESTROYER Destroyer sinks Submarine Destroyer sinks Submarine YELLOW BATTLESHIP YELLOW BATTLESHIP Battleship sinks Destroyer Battleship sinks Destroyer .
    [Show full text]