Colores in Cicero's Philippics I and II, and in Pliny's Panegyricus Marilyn Jacke Smart
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 6-1970 Colores in Cicero's Philippics I and II, and in Pliny's Panegyricus Marilyn Jacke Smart Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Smart, Marilyn Jacke, "Colores in Cicero's Philippics I and II, and in Pliny's Panegyricus" (1970). Master's Theses. Paper 980. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COLORES IN CICERO'S PHILIPPICS I AND II, AND IN PLINY'S PANEGYRICUS BY MARILYN JACKE SMART A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS JUNE 1970 LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF ANCIENT LANGUAGES 5_. ;p. I "tW ~DIRECTOR (J.rli;:,_ ~ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My eternal gratitude and love to my hus band, John, and my daughters, Beth and Susan, for their understanding and cooperation in this endeavor, but most of all for their lov ing patience which at times was only short of m1raculous. My appreciation and love which can never be adequately expressed to my mother, my fath er and my grandmother, for their tireless ef forts to free my.. time, and for their unending encouragement, comfort and love. My thanks to the members of the faculty and my friends in the Department of Ancient Languages of the University of Richmond for their friendship, encouragement and help. My very special thanks to my director and friend, Dr. Joseph s. White, for his time t' his advice and his determination and assurance that this thesis would be completed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . i PREFACE • . iii CHAPTER I Non-Technical Color • . • . 1 Technical Color • • . .. .19 CHAPTER II The First Philippic . • • • • • • 4 4 The Second Philippic . • • • • • • 5 8 CHAPTER III .71 CONCLUSION . • • 9 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY Ancient Sources . i Modern Sources • • . v VITA LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND VIRGINIA ii PREFACE Color, as a figure of speech, is a small part of the art of rhetoric. The various definitions and uses of color in a selection of ancient writers form the subject of this thesis. The purpose is to present examples of col'o'r'es found in· PhiTi·p·pics I and II of Cicero, and in the· Pan·egy'r'icus of Pliny the Younger. These ex amples will be correlated to the demands of the situation of each speaker. Cicero's speeches represent free oratory during the period of the late Republic; Pliny's speech represents epideictic oratory during the Empire. The first chapter of this thesis will serve as an introduc tion to the history and development of color in Roman rhetoric, with definitions and major examples of its meanings and uses, first as a non-technical term and then as a technical term. Major ancient writers quoted in Chapter I are Cicero, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Quintilian, Sallust, Seneca Rhetor and Juvenal. There are additional definitions and commentaries from modern writers. In Chapter II we shall examine the First and Second Philippics of Cicero with emphasis on Cicero's definitions and use of color as a non-technical term. He also used co·lor in a technical manner. He employed this well-known and frequently used oratorical device which ·only after the advent of the Rhetorical schools and the ·decline of oratory durinq the empire, assumed the Latin nomen of· ·coTor. Chapter III will deal with the· Panegyricus to the ·Emperor Trajan written by Pliny the Younger. It is a valuable example of Silver Age adulation and em bellished rhetoric in which Pliny has used abundantly both technical and non-technical ·colores. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Non-Technical Color As a definition of colores in its general and non-technical sense, Stanley F. Bonner states, "The colores are the Persian carpet of the declaimeri look at it from one angle and the colours are bright and clear, the pat tern simple, but observe it from another angle, and the shade deepens, the pattern changes, and the whole appears in a different light."l Marcus Tullius Cicero exhibited a style of ora- tory equalled by few. In its clarity and brilliance it was his g£eat strength. Such a styie recognized the necessity, nevertheless, of some type of embellishment which Cicero believed was, to a certain degree, inherent in :the very nature of good oratory: "ornatur igitur oratio genere primum et .quasi colore quodam et suco suo. 11 2 lstanley F. Bonner, Rom:an· Decl"antation in the Late Republic and Early Emoire, (California: University of- California Press, 1949), p. 56. 2cic. De Or. 3.25.96. See A. s. Wilkins, ed., M.· Tulli CiceronisDe Oratore Libri Tres, (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965), p. 459, n. 14,coIOre: "here it is • • • the generally diffused element which is thought of: we should say in this case ••• 'tone• or 'complexion'". 2 Thus the embellishment of oratory arises from its "'gen- eral character' and from its color or 'tone' and its own strength. 11 3 Cicero felt that this quality which had to be brought out by the orator, was not peculiar to any one part of oratory, but, as Ernesti writes, pertained to the whole corpus.4 It was this diffusion of ·coTor, or spirit · {sucus) , through the whole body of the speech which gave expression and feeling to the speech.5 It was color as a non-technical term with which Cicero was famill.ar. Color, as embellishment or decoration of oratory, and used in these instances by Cicero in a general, non- technical manner should not be thoughtlessly scattered at random over the entire speech. For just as satiation may occur with excessive richness in one's food and drink, so too, it easily occurs with language.6 This same stress on the necessity for moderation.in the use of colores 3wilkins, p. 459, n.14 genere. Cf. p. 518, n. 6, 11 co-io·r·em, "tone • 4J. c. T. Ernesti, Lexicon Technologiae Latinorum Rhetoricae, (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1962), p. 63, where he defines the corpus of the speech to which this quality 11 11 pertains as , a·11gemeiner Charackter der Rede • Sibid., p. 64. 6cic. De Or. 3.25.99-100. See Sen Rh.· Contr. 4.3.3, _where Pollio warns against putting a11· colores in one section; (See Bonner, p. 73). 3 is found in ·Ad Herennium: omne ·genus orationis, et grave et mediocre et atenuatum, dignitate adficiunt exornationes . • • quae ·si rarae "disponentur, distinctam si cuti coloribus, si crebrae conlocabuntur, ob liquam reddunt orationem.7 To Cicero, as to Seneca, 8 the well-applied use of ·colores was an important, even necessary ability of the well- trained orator. It was only the well-trained orator who possessed the capa~ity for rendering with grace and flavor those topics which would othe:rwise present themselves as deadly tedious and boring.9 Toward his conclusion of Book 3 of the De Oratore, Cicero again states the importance of the proper use of decorations, and then uses color in a somewhat different sense from the one he, had used previously, this time meaning "tone", in a discussion and definition of the three styles of ora tory .10 It is in all three styles, sublimi, medio et tenui, Ernesti states, that color should be found, not merely on the surface, but diffused thro~ghout in accord- 7Auct •· Ad Her. 11.16. Bsee Bonner, p. 147, where he states that Seneca was always ready to applaud a good col·or, but quite often criticized them as "far-fetched ·c16nge arcessitus, Controv. 1. 6. 9) , puerile (puerilis ,· "Suas. _2 .16, J?ionysius *µ1:'y;a,JC.1t3071s De ·rsoc. c. 12, De Dem. cc. 5, 20, 21) in bad taste (cacozelia, cacozelos, Controv. 9·.1.15, 10.2.28, Suas. 2.16, 7.11) or stupid (Controv. 1.3.11, 1.4.12) or iriept (Con:trov. 1.4.7)." 9cic. De or. 1.13.55-58. !Ocie. De or. 3.52.199. 4 ance with its very nature.11 Aqain from the De Oratore, co'lor is used with the idea of "tone": "Est", inquit Catulus , 11 ut dicis; sed iste ipse Caelius neque distinxit historiam varie tate colorum neque verborum conlocatione et tractu orationis leni et aequabili perpolivit illud opus; sed ut homo neque doctus neque maxime aptus ad dicendum, sicut potuit, dolavit; vicit tamen, ut dicis, superiores. 11 12 In commenting on this section, Wilkins states that "the MSS. all give locarum [for colorum]. • .Jacobs suggested colorum, which has been adopted by Kayser, Pid., Sorof, and some earlier editors. This is strongly supported by some parallel passages: cp.· Ad Her. 4.11.16 ••• and Or. 19.65 {of the epideictic style) ••• Of course color is in these passages (as in 3.25.95; 52.199) used in its ordinary sense, though applied figuratively •.• it is perhaps more natural here that Caelius should be charged with a want of variety in style, rather than with defic- ient sententiousness, though Cicero in Hrut. 93.322 does complain of the lack of orators in his youth ••• Kiihner rejects the reading colorum on the ground that the style is not discussed until the following clause, but this begs the question. Wit.h the reading in the text we may translate: 'But even your friend Caelius himself did llErnesti, p.