DOCSLIB.ORG

De Oratore I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

D E O R A T O R E BO O" 1 TRA N S L A TED IN TO E N G LIS H W ITH A N IN T R O DU C TIO N B Y P E N . MOOR M . , . A . A S S I S T A N T M A S T E R A T C L I F T O N C O L L E G E filamj um a nti 1 8 BU RY S TREET W C , . L O N D O N 1 8 9 2 IN TR O D U C TIO N H T E t hre e b o o k s De Ora tore seem to have been B . C 5 5 written by Cicero in the year . It was n t o n s o f a time when, owi g the i crea ing power the fo r Triumvirs, there was little room any political activity o n o f his the part Cicero . On recall from exile in the preceding year he had conceived som e hopes o f again taking a leading part in political life but owing partly to the lukewarmness o f some and the downright faith o f o f lessness others his old supporters, which made it impossible for him to resume his o l d place at the head o f s ro the optimates, and partly to the clo er union p du ced between Pom peia s and Caesar by the conference s at Luca, he thought it more advi able to withdraw f m s a s inva ri ro public life and con ole himself, was his 1 w able custom , with literary work . The ork to which w a s s De Ora tore he devoted himself the present treati e, his it is dedicated to brother Quintus, and , as we are d told in the introductory chapters, his choice was eter 1 ’ Fo r Cicero s p o sitio n a nd feelings a t this tim e see his fa m o u s er t o Len u u s A d F a m . a nd a m os n e es n essa l ett t l ( . i t i t r ti g y i t v l o f o n Cicero a nd the Triu m vira t e in the Intro d u ct o n o o . ii . the Co res o n ence o f C ce o ro essor T rrell . r p d i r , by P f y b INTRODUCTI ON ’ mined by a request o f his brother s that he would o n supplement his earlier work the same subj ect, the tione De Inven , by something more worthy of his maturer age and riper experiences as the leading orator o f s m o f Rom e . The treati e is thrown into the for a s his m dialogue, which Cicero represent as so ewhat imperfect reminiscence of a conversatio n which had o f . taken place at the Tusculan villa L Licinius Crassus, s and had been reported to him by C . Aureliu Cotta, o ne o f the interlocutors . That some such conversation t o f did ake place , we must course believe but it is scarcely credible that what Cicero gives us in these three books is anything but a fancy account of What he u s o r thinks o ght to have been aid , what he would have l o n . iked to have been said, the occasion He calls it non s a ne s a tis ex lica ta m em oria himself a p , a fairly vague expres sion which may perhaps be intended to imply that he will feel at perfect liberty to draw upon his o wn n s imaginatio , in order to supply the mis ing details o f s . the conver ation However this may be, we have a long dialogue extending through three books, and it ss must be confe ed that, as we read it, we are apt to n forget in ma y places that it is a dialogue at all . No s o f doubt at time there is a good deal dramatic play, a nd a lively interchange o f humorous and charming remarks " but the subj ect o f conversation at such a s ul moments is not a r e the question of oratory , but something extraneous to the main theme . The con INTRODUCTI ON versation does not, as a rule , contribute to the argu o f ment the dialogue, but only relieves the somewhat long-winded discourses o f the chief exponents o f ’ o f Cicero s theory oratory . It has been said that the ‘ ’ De Ora tore is the most finished, perhaps, of Cicero s o f compositions . An air grandeur and magnificence o f reigns throughout . The characters the aged n Senators are fi ely conceived, and the whole company ’ 1 is invested with an almost religious maj esty . This ‘ ’ ‘ air o f grandeur and magnificence and al most religious m ’ ajesty may be what we are finding fault with, and the fault may really lie with the reader who cannot attune himself to so high a strain but we cannot help feeling that any o f the listeners might fairly have C administered to rassus at all events, if not to the - other speakers, the well known rebuke which Lamb . administered to Coleridge “ Crassus does unmistakeably When preach, and not talk, and it is a certain relief u we reach the l e ss o m po u s and comparatively every v p day deliverance o f Antonius . The scene o f the dialogue is laid at the Tusculan f C villa o L . Licinius rassus . To this country residence he is represented as retiring fo r the brief holiday of Rom a ni B . C 1 Lu di . the , in the year 9 It was at a moment when political excitem ent w a s running very Two high . burning questions were before the Roman 1 n Dr a n s in hi o n e N e m a n u o e . S s Intro u c Jh H ry w , q t d by dy d o n t o the O ra o . ti t r, p xlix . I N TRODUCTION — o f u dicia public the reform the j , and the extension of the civita s to all the Italian yeomen . The champion s o f the party of reform was M . Livius Dru us, and he was supported by the most enlightened members o f t his . the nobili y, chief opponent being L Marcius s m Philippus, the Consul . Cra sus, therefore, acco panied f s s o o r by som e o his clo e t political friends, took the pp ’ ff Lu dz Rom a ni t u nit y o f the interval a orded by the to ’ “ retire for a few days rest and refreshment in the -in- country . His companions were his father law, Mu ciu s S Q . caevola, the Augur " Marcus Antonius, the grandfather o f the triumvir " and two younger mem f . u s . bers o the party, P Sulpici Rufus and C Aurelius Cotta, attached more immediately, the former to Cras s u s t . , and the la ter to Antonius The visit extended s over three day . On the first day, the political situation n e gaged all their attention, and was made the subj ect o f n ss . On an a imated discu ion the second day, all the morning up to the hour fo r the sie s ta was spent in a s ss o n s di cu ion oratory, which was opened by Crassu , n and in which he took the leadi g part, Antonius only briefly replying and suggesting some limitation s to the very extensive claim s m ade by Cra ssus fo r the perfect . o f S orator At the end the second day, caevola retired o wn b u t o n o f to his villa, the morning the third day his place w a s supplied by the unexpected arrival o f . Lu t a t iu s Ca t u l u s two other friends , Q , the conqueror o f o f V r ll a e ce e . the Cimbri at the battle , and C Julius INTRODUCTI ON Vo iscu s - o f Ca t u l u s Caesar Strabo p , a half brother , who in the second book takes some part in the dialogue as o f o f l the exponent the true theory wit, and its p ace and function in oratory . On the third day the dis c u ssio n was maintained till the evening . Antoniu s m discoursed throughout the orning, with a brief ’ interval for Caesar s delivera nce o n wit " and after the siesta, Crassus again took up the tale, and with but a very few interruptions from the others monopolised the afternoon . S uch is a very meagre skeleton o f the contents of the o f s ha s three books " each which, it hould be added, a few introductory sections . Here , in the first book, Cicero states his reasons and motives for writing the o wn o n treatise, and gives in brief his notions the ' r o f h e requi ements the orator " in the second, reminds his brother o f the false impression there was that Crassus a nd m en Antonius were unlearned and ignorant , and s explains how that impres ion arose " in the third , he deplores the untimely deaths of Crassus and Antonius, and the horrors o f the Marian proscription .
Recommended publications
  • INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119

    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119

    INGO GILDENHARD Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary CICERO, PHILIPPIC 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119 Latin text, study aids with vocabulary, and commentary Ingo Gildenhard https://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2018 Ingo Gildenhard The text of this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt the text and to make commercial use of the text providing attribution is made to the author(s), but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work. Attribution should include the following information: Ingo Gildenhard, Cicero, Philippic 2, 44–50, 78–92, 100–119. Latin Text, Study Aids with Vocabulary, and Commentary. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2018. https://doi. org/10.11647/OBP.0156 Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omission or error will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. In order to access detailed and updated information on the license, please visit https:// www.openbookpublishers.com/product/845#copyright Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/ All external links were active at the time of publication unless otherwise stated and have been archived via the Internet Archive Wayback Machine at https://archive.org/web Digital material and resources associated with this volume are available at https://www.
  • Karen Moore Gaylan Dubose with Steven L. Jones

    Karen Moore Gaylan Dubose with Steven L. Jones

    Karen Moore Gaylan DuBose with Steven L. Jones Latin Alive!Latin Reader: Alive! LatinReader: Literature Latin Literature from Cicero from to Cicero Newton to Teacher’sNewton Edition © Classical Academic Press, 2014 Version 1.0 ISBN: 978-1-60051-200-1978-1-60051-201-8 All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of Classical Academic Press. Classical Academic Press 2151 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 www.ClassicalAcademicPress.com Scripture labeled “Vulgate” is taken from the Latin Vulgate. Subject Editor: Edward J. Kotynski Project Editor: Lauraine E. Gustafson Design: Lauraine E. Gustafson Banner image courtesy of Vector4Free/vecteezy.com Puzzle piece image courtesy of Vecto2000.com team/vecteezy.com pp. 76, 78: Image of Arria et Paetus sculpture by Pierre Lepautre and Jean-Baptiste Théodon courtesy of Neuceu via wikipedia.org pp. 79, 82: Image of Saint Catherine’s Monastery, Sinai, Egypt, courtesy of Berthold Werner via wikipedia.org p. 153: Image of Cambridge University Library courtesy of McAnt via wikipedia.org p. 161: Image of mosaic of a child playing with hoops courtesy of Prioryman via wikipedia.org p. 161: Image of Girl with a Hoop by Pierre-Auguste Renoir courtesy of AgnosticPreachersKid via wikipedia.org MVP.06.14 The excellent teacher will love students, kindle their imaginations, and instill a love of learning. Such a teacher, wrote Henry Adams, “affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops.” I have been blessed to have three such teachers in my life.
  • Idealizing Humanitas in Cicero's De Oratore, Or, Why Herbert O. Morrison

    Idealizing Humanitas in Cicero's De Oratore, Or, Why Herbert O. Morrison

    Idealizing Humanitas in Cicero’s De oratore, or, why Herbert O. Morrison was wrong Taylor Putnam, 2016 Political Theory Research Workshop University of Toronto Working paper - please do not cite or circulate This paper draws primarily from material I intend to use in the introduction and first chapter of my dissertation, the latter of which will provide a more extensive account of Ciceronian humanitas against the backdrop of the waning Roman Republic. The larger dissertation project focuses on the concept of humanitas in the broader Roman context – traced through Cicero, Seneca the Younger, Tacitus, and Augustine - as a means to confront and challenge the modern understanding of “Humanity.” I greatly appreciate any and all feedback people are willing to share. Oh, my, get out of the way, please! It's burning and bursting into flames, and the - and it's falling on the mooring-mast and all the folks agree that this is terrible, this is one of the worst catastrophes in the world. […] It's–it's–it's the flames, […] oh, four- or five-hundred feet into the sky and it ... it's a terrific crash, ladies and gentlemen. It's smoke, and it's flames now ... and the frame is crashing to the ground, not quite to the mooring-mast. Oh, the humanity and all the passengers screaming around here. I told you, I can't even talk to people whose friends are on there. Ah! It's–it's–it's–it's ... o–ohhh! I–I can't talk, ladies and gentlemen. Honest, it's just laying there, a mass of smoking wreckage.
  • Performance and Rhetoric in Cicero's Philippics * in Recent Years, the Idea Of

    Performance and Rhetoric in Cicero's Philippics * in Recent Years, the Idea Of

    Performance and Rhetoric in Cicero's Philippics * In recent years, the idea of 'performance' has become a more and more important concept for the analysis of literary texts, even if the notion of 'performance' in literary criticism still does not denote a single agreed theory, but is a collective term referring to a number of different aspects and methods. The performance approach seems obvious for some literary genres, like drama and also oratory, for which performance is an essential char­ acteristic. In the case of orations, in antiquity already a detailed doctrine of the perfect performance was established, both in theory and practice. Building on this knowledge and trying to recover the quintessential context of a speech, people have successfully attempted to explore a Roman orator's potential and to contexrualize Roman orations by reconstructing the delivery of sample speeches.' However, there are further levels of performance to be looked at in a Roman speech if the term 'performance' is understood in a more specific way: there is not only the actio that determines the performance of a complete speech; the texts of transmitted speeches also exhibit passages where the wording shows that the orator bases his argument on the performance situation, particularly by making use of the active participation of the audience. Reactions from the audience are deliberately elicited by the orator, for instance by taking on certain roles; these techniques stem from his rhetorical training (for example, ethopoiia); however, considering and commenting on these reactions subsequently yield a performative dialogue with the audience, mirrored in the text. That opens up the opportunity to reconstruct a performance situation which goes beyond identifying how rhetorical techniques have been realized by the orator.
  • Obama's Discourse of "Hope": Making Rhetoric Work Politically

    Obama's Discourse of "Hope": Making Rhetoric Work Politically

    Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically Marcus Letts University of Bristol © Marcus Letts School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies University of Bristol Working Paper No. 04-09 Marcus Letts is a former undergraduate student in the Department of Politics, University of Bristol. This paper, originally a BSc dissertation, received the highest mark awarded to any BSc dissertation in Politics at the University of Bristol in 2008-2009. A revised version of this paper is currently being prepared for submission to the journal New Political Science. University of Bristol School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies Title: Obama's discourse of "hope": Making rhetoric work politically (Morris, C. 2008) Question: What is articulated in Obama's discourse of "hope"? How did this rhetoric work politically? Marcus Letts Word Count: 9,899 2 Contents: Introduction: The US elections of 2008: A contextualisation The "strange death of Republican America": A grand theme of change................................ 5 A "rhetorical situation"?.......................................................................................................... 6 The birth of "Brand Obama": An exceptional campaign........................................................ 7 The nature of American "polyarchy"...................................................................................... 9 Literature Review: Two theories of discourse. Derrida's deconstruction and Laclau logics: A theory of discourse.......................................10
  • Cicero, Rhetoric, and Republicanism in the Columbian Orator

    Cicero, Rhetoric, and Republicanism in the Columbian Orator

    Cicero, Rhetoric, and Republicanism in the Columbian Orator The influence of ancient Greece and Rome on early America was pervasive, and recent scholarship (e.g., Richard 1995, Winterer 2004) has shown how this familiarity with the classics affected many aspects of American public and personal life. Much work, however, remains to be done in tracing out the specific strands of classical learning that early Americans encountered. This paper, by providing an examination of how a key classical figure, Cicero, is presented in a key schoolroom text of early America (Caleb Bingham’s 1797 Columbian Orator), will model a strategy for how this sort of work can proceed. For many early Americans, the Columbian Orator would have been the first introduction to the art of speaking and writing like an American: over 200,000 copies were sold, and the textbook went through twenty-three editions, the last one printed in 1860. As a radically egalitarian republican, Bingham believed that the new republic needed educated and equally egalitarian citizens to advocate on its behalf, and his textbook presented readers with a dignified, classical style of speech that was bare of any aristocratic affectations (Cmiel 1990). The influence of Bingham’s textbook on early American intellectual thought was profound. Abraham Lincoln pored over it during a cold Illinois winter, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Harriet Beecher Stowe drew some of their nonconformist activism from its pages, and in 1830, a young slave named Frederick Douglass took 50 cents he had earned from polishing boots and bought himself a copy. Bingham’s abolitionist spirit spoke powerfully to Douglass, who later said that “every opportunity I got, I used to read this book” (Blight 1998).
  • Classical Rhetoric in America During the Colonial and Early National Periods

    Classical Rhetoric in America During the Colonial and Early National Periods

    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Communication Scholarship Communication 9-2011 “Above all Greek, above all Roman Fame”: Classical Rhetoric in America during the Colonial and Early National Periods James M. Farrell University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/comm_facpub Part of the Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Cultural History Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation James M. Farrell, "'Above all Greek, above all Roman fame': Classical Rhetoric in America during the Colonial and Early National Periods," International Journal of the Classical Tradition 18:3, 415-436. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Above all Greek, above all Roman Fame”: Classical Rhetoric in America during the Colonial and Early National Periods James M. Farrell University of New Hampshire The broad and profound influence of classical rhetoric in early America can be observed in both the academic study of that ancient discipline, and in the practical approaches to persuasion adopted by orators and writers in the colonial period, and during the early republic. Classical theoretical treatises on rhetoric enjoyed wide authority both in college curricula and in popular treatments of the art. Classical orators were imitated as models of republican virtue and oratorical style. Indeed, virtually every dimension of the political life of early America bears the imprint of a classical conception of public discourse.
  • Cicero and Barack Obama: How to Unite the Republic Without Losing Your Head

    Cicero and Barack Obama: How to Unite the Republic Without Losing Your Head

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2020 Cicero and Barack Obama: How to Unite the Republic Without Losing Your Head Michael J. Cedrone Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2266 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3607105 Nevada Law Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 1177. This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Legal Writing and Research Commons 20 NEV. L.J. 1177 CICERO AND BARACK OBAMA: HOW TO UNITE THE REPUBLIC WITHOUT LOSING YOUR HEAD Michael J. Cedrone* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1178 I. AUTHOR AND AUDIENCE IN THE LIFE OF CICERO AND IN DE ORATORE .......................................................................................... 1182 A. Cicero: A Career Built on Oratory ........................................... 1182 B. De Oratore’s Purposes: Gazing on the Orator ......................... 1185 C. Setting the Scene for De Oratore: Location, Situation, Participants ............................................................................... 1186 D. Rhetoric, Philosophy, Action, Audience, and Power ................ 1187 II. CICERO AND BARACK OBAMA: RIGHTING THE SHIP OF STATE ........ 1191
  • John F. Kennedy at American University: the Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace

    John F. Kennedy at American University: the Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace

    The College of Wooster Open Works All Faculty Articles All Faculty Scholarship 2014 John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace Denise M. Bostdorff The College of Wooster, [email protected] Shawna Ferris The College of Wooster Follow this and additional works at: https://openworks.wooster.edu/facpub Recommended Citation Bostdorff, Denise M. and Ferris, Shawna, "John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace" (2014). Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100(4), 407-441. 10.1080/00335630.2014.989895. Retrieved from https://openworks.wooster.edu/ facpub/239 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Faculty Scholarship at Open Works, a service of The College of Wooster Libraries. This article is a(n) Accepted Manuscript and was originally published in Quarterly Journal of Speech (2014), available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2014.989895. For questions about OpenWorks, please contact [email protected]. John F. Kennedy at American University: The Rhetoric of the Possible, Epideictic Progression, and the Commencement of Peace Denise M. Bostdorff and Shawna H. Ferris Abstract: In his American University address, Kennedy employed epideictic progression, a pedagogical process drawing upon dissociation and epideictic norms to convince listeners, gradually, to embrace a new vision—in this case, a world in which a test ban treaty with the USSR was possible. To do so, Kennedy’s words: (1) united the audience behind the value of “genuine peace”; (2) humanized the Soviets as worthy partners in genuine peace; (3) established the reality of the Cold War and the credibility of US leadership; and (4) connected lessons on genuine peace to domestic civil rights.
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1957 A Rhetorical Study of the Gubernatorial Speaking of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Paul Jordan Pennington Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Pennington, Paul Jordan, "A Rhetorical Study of the Gubernatorial Speaking of Franklin D. Roosevelt." (1957). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/222 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A RHETORICAL STUD* OP THE GUBERNATORIAL SPEAKING OP FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Meohanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Speech by Paul Jordan Pennington B. A., Henderson State Teachers College, 19U8 M. A., Oklahoma University, 1950 August, 1957 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The writer wishes to acknowledge the inspiration, guidance, and continuous supervision of Dr. Waldo W. Braden, Professor of Speech at Louisiana State University. As the writer1s major advisor, he has given generously of his time, his efforts, and his sound advice. Dr. Braden is in no way responsible for any errors or short-comings of this study, but his suggestions are largely responsible for any merits it may possess. Dr. C. M. Wise, Head of the Department of Speech, and Dr.
  • Barack Obama the Pursuit of Identity EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

    Barack Obama the Pursuit of Identity EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

    Barack Obama The pursuit of identity EPISODE TRANSCRIPT Listen to Presidential at http://wapo.st/presidential This transcript was run through an automated transcription service and then lightly edited for clarity. There may be typos or small discrepancies from the podcast audio. BARRACK OBAMA CLIP: I stand here knowing that my story is part of the larger American story -- that I owe a debt to all of those who came before me and that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: This is Barack Obama in 2004 before he had held any national political office. Four years later, he would be elected the first black president of the United States. BARRACK OBAMA: Our pride is based on a very simple premise, summed up in a declaration made over 200 years ago: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal. That they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights. That among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.’ That is the true genius of America. LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: I'm Lillian Cunningham with The Washington Post, and this is the 43rd episode of “Presidential.” PRESIDENTIAL THEME MUSIC LILLIAN CUNNINGHAM: This isn't our very final episode of the series, but it is our last episode chronicling the people who've served already as president of the United States. So, I think it's fitting that, in this episode, we come full circle to a question that we've really been asking since the very beginning, which is, 'Who are we?' Well, that question -- 'Who am I?' -- is essentially at the very core of Obama's own personal story.
  • The Civic Education of Cicero's Ideal Orator

    The Civic Education of Cicero's Ideal Orator

    [Expositions 8.1 (2014) 122–144] Expositions (online) ISSN: 1747–5376 The Civic Education of Cicero’s Ideal Orator JOSEPH A. DILUZIO Baylor University Scarcely five years after the Roman people hailed him as “father of the fatherland” for his role in saving the Republic from a revolutionary plot, Cicero was banished from Rome. A violent and demagogic tribune, backed by a cabal of ruthless senators including Julius Caesar and Pompey the Great, had arranged for his removal. Though he would return the following year, Rome’s leading orator increasingly found himself politically hamstrung and the republican system plagued by dysfunction. Intent on remedying the ills of the Republic, Cicero took to writing philosophy. He began, significantly enough, with On the Ideal Orator (de Oratore), the first of three dialogues written over five years, all of which aimed to defend and encourage the teaching of republican values among the Roman nobility. All senators were orators capable of addressing the courts, the Senate, and popular meetings; through their speeches, they set policy, advocated justice, shaped public opinion, and won popular acclaim. Since the end of the second century BC, however, Rome’s republican consensus had faltered, and a number of powerful orators had used their education and natural abilities to stir unrest for their own political ends. Cicero had noted this fact in the introduction to his youthful de Inventione, a rhetorical handbook. Despite the differences in style and content, the prologue of de Inventione adumbrates several themes that would feature prominently in his later de Oratore, among them, the essential role of oratory in establishing and sustaining the Republic and the need for orators to possess wisdom and eloquence (Inv.