DOCSLIB.ORG

Финно-Угроведение, 2019 (№ 60) Научный Журнал Основан В Феврале 1994 Г

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Финно-Угроведение, 2019 (№ 60) Научный Журнал Основан В Феврале 1994 Г ФИННО-УГРОВЕДЕНИЕ, 2019 (№ 60) Научный журнал Основан в феврале 1994 г. Учредитель – Государственное бюджетное научное учреждение при Правительстве Республики Марий Эл «Марийский научно-исследовательский институт языка, литературы и истории им. В.М. Васильева» Редакционный совет: Кузьмин Евгений Петрович, председатель ред. совета, канд. ист. н., директор МарНИИЯЛИ (г. Йошкар-Ола) Пенькова Мария Викентьевна, секретарь ред. совета, канд. филол. н., зам. директора-ученый секретарь МарНИИЯЛИ (г. Йошкар-Ола) Агранат Татьяна Борисовна, д-р филол. н., ведущий научный сотрудник Института языкознания РАН (г. Москва) Воронцов Владимир Степанович, канд. ист. н., старший научный сотрудник Удмуртского института истории, языка и литературы УрО РАН (г. Ижевск) Зайцева Нина Григорьевна, д-р филол. н., зав. сектором языкознания Института языка, литературы и истории КарНЦ РАН (г. Петрозаводск) Косинцева Елена Викторовна, д-р филол. н., доцент, главный научный сотрудник Обско-угорского института прикладных исследований и разработок (г. Ханты-Мансийск) Крыласова Наталья Борисовна, д-р ист. н., главный научный сотрудник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра УрО РАН (г. Пермь) Куршева Галина Александровна, д-р ист. н., директор Научно-исследовательского института гуманитарных наук при Правительстве Республики Мордовия (г. Саранск) Лехтинен Илдико, д-р философии, доцент Хельсинкского университета (г. Хельсинки, Финляндия) Ошаев Алексей Григорьевич, канд. ист. н., декан историко-филологического факультета Марийского государственного университета (г. Йошкар-Ола) Пустаи Янош, профессор, д-р философии, председатель Ассоциации финно-угорских литератур, директор Института Collegium Fenno-Ugricum (г. Будапешт, Венгрия) Ракин Анатолий Николаевич, д-р филол. н., главный научный сотрудник Института языка, литературы и истории Коми НЦ УрО РАН (г. Сыктывкар) Сергеев Олег Арсентьевич, канд. филол. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ (г. Йошкар-Ола) Тендер Тыну, д-р философии, директор Института эстонского языка (г. Тарту, Эстония) Чузаев Родион Иванович, канд. ист. н., директор Института национальной культуры и межкультурной коммуникации Марийского государственного университета (г. Йошкар-Ола) Редакционная коллегия: Никитина Татьяна Багишевна – главный редактор, д-р ист. н., главный научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Абукаева Любовь Алексеевна – зам. редактора, д-р филол. н., главный научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Пекшеева Эльвира Ивановна – отв. секретарь, канд. филол. н., старший научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Григорьева Людмила Яковлевна – отв. редактор направления «Лингвистика», канд. филол. н., зам. директора МарНИИЯЛИ Кошкина Ольга Анатольевна – отв. редактор направления «История», канд. ист. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Михеев Алексей Викторович – отв. редактор направления «Археология», канд. ист. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Молотова Тамара Лаврентьевна – отв. редактор направления «Этнология», канд. ист. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Орлова Ольга Викторовна – отв. редактор направления «Социология», канд. ист. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Федосеева Надежда Александровна – отв. редактор направления «Литературоведение и фольклористика», канд. филол. н., ведущий научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Глухова Наталья Николаевна – д-р филол. н., профессор Марийского государственного университета Ключева Мария Аркадьевна – канд. искусствоведения, старший научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ Кудрявцева Раисия Алексеевна – д-р филол. н., профессор Марийского государственного университета Шкалина Галина Евгеньевна – д-р культурологии, профессор Марийского государственного университета Мнения, высказанные в материалах журнала, не обязательно совпадают с точкой зрения редакции © МарНИИЯЛИ, 2019 © Авторы статей, 2019 Editorial Review Board: Kuzmin E.P., Candidate of History, Director of the Mari Research Institute, Editorial Board Chairman (Yoshkar-Ola) Penkova M.V., Candidate of Philology, Deputy Director-Academic Secretary of the Mari Research Insti- tute, Editorial Board Secretary (Yoshkar-Ola) Agranat T.B., Doctor of Philology, Leading Researcher of the Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow) Vorontsov V.S., Candidate of History, Senior Researcher of the Udmurt Institute of History, Language, and Literature, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Izhevsk) Zaitseva N.G., Doctor of Philology, Head of Linguistics Sector of the Institute of Language, Literature, and History, Carelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Petrozavodsk) Kosintseva E.V., Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor, Chief Researcher of Ob-Uric Institute of Ap- plied Researches and Development (Khanty-Mansiysk) Krylasova N.B., Doctor of History, Chief Researcher of the Perm Federal Research Centre, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Perm) Kursheva G.A., Doctor of History, Director of the Research Institute of Humanities affi liated to the Governmet of the Republic of Mordovia (Saransk) Lehtinen Ildiko, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Helsinki (Helsinki, Finland) Oshaev A.G., Candidate of History, Dean of the Faculty of History and Philology, Mari State University (Yoshkar-Ola) Pusztay János, Chairman of the Association of Finno-Ugric Literatures, Director of Collegium Fenno-Ugricum (Budapest, Hungary) Rakin A.N., Doctor of Philology, Chief Researcher of the Institute of Language, Literature and History of the Komi Scientifi c Center, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Syktyvkar) Sergeev O.A., Candidate of Philology, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute (Yoshkar-Ola) Tõnu Tender, PhD, Director of the Estonian Language Institute (Tartu, Estonia) Chuzaev R.I., Candidate of History, Director of the Institute of National Culture and Intercultural Com- munication (Yoshkar-Ola) Editorial Board: Nikitina T.B., Editor-in-Chief, Doctor of History, Chief Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Abukaeva L.A., Deputy Editor, Doctor of Philology, Chief Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Peksheeva E.I., Executive Secretary of the journal, Candidate of Philology, Senior Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Grigoryeva L.Ya., Executive Editor of the series «Linguistics», Candidate of Philology, Deputy Direc- tor of the Mari Research Institute Fedoseeva N.A., Executive Editor of the series «Literary Studies and Folklore Studies», Candidate of Philology, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Mikheev A.V., Executive Editor of the series «Archeology», Candidate of History, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Koshkina O.A., Executive Editor of the series «History», Candidate of History, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Molotova T.L., Executive Editor of the series «Ethnology», Candidate of History, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Orlova O.V., Executive Editor of the series «Sociology», Candidate of History, Leading Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Klyucheva M.A., Candidate of Art History, Senior Researcher of the Mari Research Institute Kudryavtseva R.A., Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Mari State University Glukhova N.N., Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Mari State University Shkalina G.E., Doctor of Culturology, Professor of the Mari State University СОДЕРЖАНИЕ СТАТЬИ ЛИНГВИСТИКА Беленов Н.В. Географическая лексика шелехметского говора мокша-мордовского языка ....................................... 5 Зайцева Н.Г., Жукова О.Ю. Вепсское vs русское в происхождении наименований понятий «корзина» и «ушат» в языке вепсов (на материале ЛАВЯ) .................................................................................................................. 9 Пекшеева Э.И. Историко-генетический анализ некоторых названий охотничьих ловушек в марийском языке 18 Сергеев О.А. Из истории изучения переводной христианской литературы на марийском языке XIX – начала XX в. ................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Теуш О.А. Прибалтийско-финская по происхождению лексика с семантикой «заболоченное место» в диалектах Европейского севера России ............................................................................................................................. 31 Цыпанов Е.А. Значения древнекоми названий месяцев урасьöм ‘февраль’ и косму ‘апрель’ ................................. 50 Эрцикова Г.А. О союзах следствия в современном марийском языке ...................................................................... 53 ЛИТЕРАТУРОВЕДЕНИЕ И ФОЛЬКЛОРИСТИКА Камитова А.В. Фольклорные экспедиции Кузебая Герда: малоизвестные страницы ..................................................... 59 Лисовская Г.К. Преемственность или новизна: к вопросу о современных тенденциях в коми литерату рове- дении (на примере анализа стихотворения И.А. Куратова «Менам муза») ...................................................................... 66 Остапова Е.В. Особенности перевода на русский язык дилогии В. Савина (Небдiнса Виттора) «Райын» / «В раю» и «Инасьтӧм лов» / «Неприкаянная душа» ........................................................................................................... 73 ИСТОРИЯ Акшиков А.Г. Марийские тамги (тисте): некоторые проблемы изучения ................................................................ 77 Бажин В.В. Филиграни на тряпичной бумаге ручного производства Угличских бумажных фабрик XVIII – первой половины XIX в. в документах Государственного архива Республики Марий Эл ..............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Études Finno-Ougriennes, 47 | 2015 2
    Études finno-ougriennes 47 | 2015 Varia Édition électronique URL : https://journals.openedition.org/efo/4898 DOI : 10.4000/efo.4898 ISSN : 2275-1947 Éditeur INALCO Édition imprimée ISBN : 978-2-343-08571-5 ISSN : 0071-2051 Référence électronique Études finno-ougriennes, 47 | 2015 [En ligne], mis en ligne le 31 décembre 2015, consulté le 21 septembre 2021. URL : https://journals.openedition.org/efo/4898 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/efo. 4898 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 21 septembre 2021. Études finno-ougriennes est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International. 1 Les articles qui forment le numéro 47 des Études Finno-ougriennes présentent une grande diversité et couvrent presque toutes les aires finno-ougriennes, à l’exception du monde same. Il couvre également un bon nombre des disciplines de sciences humaines concernées par la revue. Ce numéro comporte les rubriques traditionnelles des articles scientifiques, des chroniques et des comptes rendus – particulièrement nombreux dans ce volume. Nous avions introduit dans le numéro 46 une rubrique terrain : elle vise à encourager ceux de nos chercheurs qui font des terrains à rapidement partager leurs expériences. Cette année, nous avons ajouté une rubrique « aperçus », qui permet d’introduire des textes présentant un intérêt, mais ne relevant pas des rubriques traditionnelles. Quant aux disciplines représentées dans l’ensemble du numéro, nous avons la linguistique (avec différentes sous-branches, phonologie, étude de discours, langues en danger, histoire de la langue), l’anthropologie/ethnologie, la sociologie (surtout concentrée sur la langue), la musicologie, les études littéraires, l’histoire, l’oralité.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Mari Belief: the Formation of Ethnic Religion
    Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics 12 (2): 79–114 DOI: 10.2478/jef-2018-0013 CONTEMPORARY MARI BELIEF: THE FORMATION OF ETHNIC RELIGION TATIANA ALYBINA PhD, Researcher Estonian National Museum Muuseumi tee 2, 60534 Tartu, Estonia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this article* I describe the process of developing of Mari ethnic religion based on the tradition of animistic beliefs. I aim to consider two areas of contemporary Mari religion, the activities of the official religious organisation and the vernacular tra- dition as practiced by people in the countryside. The Mari vernacular belief system has been seen as one of the components of Mari ethnic identity. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Mari religious tradition has played a role in strengthening national identity, and so the religious organisation has been officially registered. Today there is an attempt to adapt Mari religious practices to the conditions of the religious market, in the face of which vernacular tradition seems to lose its con- nection with the ethnic worldview and rural way of life. My analysis of research material from fieldwork conducted shows the existence of belief rituals that are followed independently from the official Mari religious movement. Contemporary Mari religious tradition has two layers and can be described as a process of trans- formation from vernacular belief to ethnic religion with its religious institutions and group of experts. KEYWORDS: ethnic religion • animism • vernacular belief • Mari people • Finno- Ugric ethnology INTRODUCTION The European discourse of modern animistic religions includes the variety of New Reli- gious movements with environmentalism component and reconstructions of ‘pagan’ rituals (‘neo-paganism’).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Sogaz Insurance Group
    ANNUAL REPORT OF SOGAZ INSURANCE GROUP CONTENTS 03 BRAND PROMOTION 33 04 Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors 6 Address by the Chairman of the Management Board 7 SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 35 01 05 SOGAZ INSURANCE GROUP PROFILE 9 OPERATING EFFICIENCY OF THE GROUP 39 Group Management 10 > Personnel Management 39 Group’s Position in the Insurance Market 11 > Location of Head Office 41 > Information Technology 42 > Risk Management 43 02 SOGAZ GROUP’S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN 2010 15 06 Corporate Insurance 15 INVESTMENT POLICY 47 > Insurance of the Fuel and Energy Industry 15 > Industrial Insurance 18 > Transport Insurance 18 07 > Agricultural Sector Insurance 20 > Insurance of Federal and Regional Targeted FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 49 Investment Programs 21 > Balance Sheet of OJSC SOGAZ 49 > Personal Insurance 22 > Income Statement of OJSC SOGAZ 53 Reinsurance 25 > Auditor’s Report 56 Regional Network Development 27 International Development 28 Loss Adjustment 29 08 RETAIL INSURANCE 31 CONTACT INFORMATION 59 Annual Report, 2010 г. CONTENTS 5 Dear shareholders, One of the milestone events in the Russian insurance market in 2010 was the adoption of the law regarding obligatory insurance of hazardous production facility owners’ liability. Today, work is underway to develop a number of key legislative drafts aimed at expanding the application field of insurance as an efficient risk management tool, which will provide a great spark to the development of insurance in Russia. In many respects, the crucial factor at this stage will be the activities of the industry’s leaders. They are to play the key role in formation of insurance culture in Russia, establish new quality standards of insurers’ activities and enhance public confidence in the institution of insurance at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    ANNUAL REPORT 2008 Contents Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors 2 Address by the Chairman of the Management Board 4 SOGAZ Insurance Group members 6 Management Board of OJSC SOGAZ 8 Highlights of the year 10 Strategy of SOGAZ Group up to 2012 15 Key results of SOGAZ Group operation in 2008 17 Social activities of SOGAZ Group 20 Financial report of SOGAZ Insurance Group 23 Auditor’s Report on financial statements of OJSC SOGAZ Balance Sheet of OJSC SOGAZ Income Statement of OJSC SOGAZ Contact Information 31 Representative offices of SOGAZ Insurance Group 32 Representative offices of OJSC SOGAZ Representative offices of OJSC IC SOGAZ-LIFE Representative offices of OJSC IC SOGAZ-MED Representative offices of OJSC IC SOGAZ-AGRO 1 Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors Chairman of the Management Board of OJSC Gazprom Chairman of the Board of Directors of OJSC SOGAZ A.B. Miller 2 Address by the Chairman of the Board of Directors Dear shareholders, Summing up the results of the year, I’m glad to point out that despite the crisis developments in the world economy SOGAZ Group has consolidated its positions among the top three players in the Russian insurance market. It has demonstrated significant growth in charges and profits. By the end of 2008 SOGAZ had occupied 7.4% of the domestic insurance market. It is conclusive evidence of proper management work, adequate investment decisions, and a reliable performance control and assessment system. SOGAZ’s long-term strategic goals remain unchanged. The search for new development opportunities keeps going on.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report
    QUARTERLY REPORT Open Joint Stock Company “VolgaTelecom” The issuer’s code: 0 0 1 3 7 - A For quarter III of 2006 The issuer’s location: Russian Federation, 603000, Nizhny Novgorod city, M.Gorky square, Dom Svyazi The information contained in this quarterly report is subject to disclosure in accordance with Russian Federation legislation on securities Acting General Director _________________ / O.V. Ershov / signature Name Date " 13 " November 2006. Deputy to chief accountant _________________ / N.P. Voronkova / signature Name Date " 13 " November 2006. LS Contact person: Expert of 1-st category Mrs. Mironova Elena Petrovna Phone: (8312) 37 51 39 Fax: (8312) 30 67 68 E-mail: [email protected] The address of Internet web-site(s) where the information contained in this quarterly report is disclosed: http://www.vt.ru/?id=312 1 Table of contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………..6 I. Brief data on persons forming the issuer’s management body structure, data on bank accounts, on auditor, appraiser, and the issuer’s financial adviser, and also on other persons who signed the quarterly report 1.1. Persons forming the issuer’s management body structure …….…………………….…12 1.1.1. The issuer’s collegial management body ………………………...……………..12 1.1.2. The issuer’s collegial executive body ………………...…………………….…..12 1.1.3. The issuer’s single executive body ……………………………………………..13 1.2. Data on the issuer’s bank accounts …………………………………………………….13 1.3. Data on the issuer’s auditor (auditors) ……………………………………………..…..16 1.4. Data on the issuer’s appraiser ………………………………...………………………..18 1.5. Data on the issuer’s advisers …………………………………………..………………18 1.6. Data on other persons who signed this quarterly report …………………………..…...19 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Beliefs and Official Traditional Religion the Position and Meaning of the Mari Worldview in the Current Context
    TATIANA ALYBINA Vernacular Beliefs and Official Traditional Religion The position and meaning of the Mari worldview in the current context ernacular religion connected with the clan was Ethnographers also notice that ‘ethnic’ religions and expected to adapt in the context of globali- faith traditions, as forms of worldviews, reside deep Vsation and the vanishing ideals of traditional within the structures of culture and have an effect (tribal) societies. But at the turn of the twentieth and upon these structures. The period of state-sponsored twenty-first centuries a revival of European ‘pagan- atheism did not entirely uproot forms of religious ism’ has appeared (Koskello 2009: 295). Svetlana thought or rituals associated with Russia’s ethnic Chvervonnaya suggests that a return to vernacular be- minorities (Siikala and Ulyashev 2012: 312). Even liefs is not only happening in the mass religious mind in the context of the ideological dominance of Islam of some Eastern European and Asian people, but also in some regions, clusters of Muslim-heathen ‘double in the romantic mythologemes which are being cre- beliefs’1 (dvoeverie in Russian), or an explicit return ated by national elites. Lithuanians, who were Chris- to archaic beliefs, are emerging (Shnirelman 2008: tianised in the fourteenth century – the last nation in 1187). Among groups whose vernacular belief tradi- the Baltic region to undergo this process – recall their tions are a basis for cultural identity are the Adygs, heathen roots; Ukrainians revive their rodnoverie – indi- the Bashkirs and others (Chervonnaya 1998: 200). genous beliefs – in an attempt to resist the Orthodox The cult of Tengry – the pre-Islamic religion of the and Catholic Churches (Chervonnaya 1998: 200).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide for Readers and Teachers
    Six Thousand Miles to Home: A Guide for Readers and Teachers This guide collates notes relevant to the socio-cultural and historical contexts of the novel Six Thousand Miles to Home. It is organized according to the narrative’s chronology and divided according to the novel’s three major sections and their respective chapters. Background material—about Jewish life in both Poland and Iran—precedes the sections of the book set in those countries. In between the notes for each chapter are historical “snapshots,” most of them derived from primary source material, and which serve to illustrate events described in the novel. Please check back at this web page for revised versions of this free guide. JEWISH LIFE IN POLAND, SILESIA, AND TESCHEN Numerous volumes recount in detail the thousand-year history of Jews in Poland as well as the circumstances particular to the Silesian Duchy of Teschen and its Jewish inhabitants.1 What follows here is a summary. Medieval Period Jews inhabited Poland since at least the tenth century when, fleeing persecution in German territories, they made their way east.2 One legend recounts that a scrap of paper directed them to “Polaniaya,” a Hebrew name for Poland, which they interpreted as meaning “Here God dwells.” They arrived in a forest where they heard the word Polin, another Hebrew name for Poland, which they interpreted as “Po-lin,” “Rest here.” In some versions [of the legend], a cloud broke and an angel’s hand pointed the way and a voice said “Po-lin.” According to [another] version […], Jews entering the forest discovered tractates of the Talmud carved on the trees; in other versions, pages of the sacred texts floated down.3 This story begins in a town called Teschen (called Cieszyn both before and after the time of this narrative) was populated by Slavic peoples by at least the seventh century.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Mari Belief: the Formation of Ethnic Religion
    Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics 12 (2): 95–114 DOI: 10.2478/jef-2018-0013 CONTEMPORARY MARI BELIEF: THE FORMATION OF ETHNIC RELIGION TATIANA ALYBINA PhD, Researcher Estonian National Museum Muuseumi tee 2, 60534 Tartu, Estonia e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this article* I describe the process of developing of Mari ethnic religion based on the tradition of animistic beliefs. I aim to consider two areas of contemporary Mari religion, the activities of the official religious organisation and the vernacular tra- dition as practiced by people in the countryside. The Mari vernacular belief system has been seen as one of the components of Mari ethnic identity. Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Mari religious tradition has played a role in strengthening national identity, and so the religious organisation has been officially registered. Today there is an attempt to adapt Mari religious practices to the conditions of the religious market, in the face of which vernacular tradition seems to lose its con- nection with the ethnic worldview and rural way of life. My analysis of research material from fieldwork conducted shows the existence of belief rituals that are followed independently from the official Mari religious movement. Contemporary Mari religious tradition has two layers and can be described as a process of trans- formation from vernacular belief to ethnic religion with its religious institutions and group of experts. KEYWORDS: ethnic religion • animism • vernacular belief • Mari people • Finno- Ugric ethnology INTRODUCTION The European discourse of modern animistic religions includes the variety of New Reli- gious movements with environmentalism component and reconstructions of ‘pagan’ rituals (‘neo-paganism’).
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching Atheism and Religion in the Mari Republic, Russian Federation
    FORMS AND METHODS: TEACHING ATHEISM AND RELIGION IN THE MARI REPUBLIC, RUSSIAN FEDERATION by Sonja Christine Luehrmann A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology and History) in the University of Michigan 2009 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Alaina M. Lemon, Chair Professor E. Webb Keane Jr. Professor William G. Rosenberg Associate Professor Douglas T. Northrop © Sonja Christine Luehrmann All rights reserved 2009 In loving-guessing memory of my grandparents, Karl Lührmann (1892-1978) and Käte Lührmann née Emkes (1907-1997), who were, among other things, rural school teachers, and bequeathed me a riddle about what happens to people as they move between ideological systems. ii Acknowledgements On the evening of January 18, 2006, over tea between vespers and the midnight mass in honor of the feast of the Baptism of Christ, the Orthodox priest of one of Marij El’s district centers questioned the visiting German anthropologist about her views on intellectual influence. “You have probably read all three volumes of Capital, in the original?” – Some of it, I cautiously admitted. “Do you think Marx wrote it himself?” – I said that I supposed so. “And I tell you, it was satan who wrote it through his hand.” I remember making a feeble defense in the name of interpretative charity, saying that it seemed safer to assume that human authors were capable of their own errors, but could not always foresee the full consequences of their ideas. The priest seemed unimpressed, but was otherwise kind enough to sound almost apologetic when he reminded me that as a non-Orthodox Christian, I had to leave the church after the prayers for the catechumens, before the beginning of the liturgy of communion.
    [Show full text]
  • Финно-Угроведение, 2020 (№ 61) Научный Журнал Основан В Феврале 1994 Г
    ФИННО-УГРОВЕДЕНИЕ, 2020 (№ 61) Научный журнал Основан в феврале 1994 г. ISSN 2312-0312 (Print), ISSN 2713-2250 (Online) Учредитель – Государственное бюджетное научное учреждение при Правительстве Республики Марий Эл «Марийский научно-исследовательский институт языка, литературы и истории им. В.М. Васильева» Редакционный совет: Кузьмин Евгений Петрович, председатель ред. совета, канд. ист. н., директор МарНИИЯЛИ (г. Йошкар-Ола) Пенькова Мария Викентьевна, секретарь ред. совета, канд. филол. н., зам. директора-ученый секретарь МарНИИЯЛИ (г. Йошкар-Ола) Агранат Татьяна Борисовна, д-р филол. н., ведущий научный сотрудник Института языкознания РАН (г. Москва) Воронцов Владимир Степанович, канд. ист. н., старший научный сотрудник Удмуртского института истории, языка и литературы УрО РАН (г. Ижевск) Зайцева Нина Григорьевна, д-р филол. н., зав. сектором языкознания Института языка, литературы и истории КарНЦ РАН (г. Петрозаводск) Косинцева Елена Викторовна, д-р филол. н., доцент, главный научный сотрудник Обско-угорского института прикладных исследований и разработок (г. Ханты-Мансийск) Крыласова Наталья Борисовна, д-р ист. н., главный научный сотрудник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра УрО РАН (г. Пермь) Куршева Галина Александровна, д-р ист. н., директор Научно-исследовательского института гуманитарных наук при Правительстве Республики Мордовия (г. Саранск) Лехтинен Илдико, д-р философии, доцент Хельсинкского университета (г. Хельсинки, Финляндия) Ошаев Алексей Григорьевич, канд. ист. н., декан историко-филологического факультета Марийского государственного университета (г. Йошкар-Ола) Пустаи Янош, профессор, д-р философии, председатель Ассоциации финно-угорских литератур, директор Института Collegium Fenno-Ugricum (г. Будапешт, Венгрия) Ракин Анатолий Николаевич, д-р филол. н., главный научный сотрудник Института языка, литературы и истории Коми НЦ УрО РАН (г. Сыктывкар) Сергеев Олег Арсентьевич, канд. филол. н., старший научный сотрудник МарНИИЯЛИ (г.
    [Show full text]
  • Venäjän Federaation Paikannimiä
    Venäjän federaation paikannimiä Oikeinkirjoitus- ja painotusopas Toimittaneet Pirjo Mikkonen, Martti Kahla, Ida Kempinen ja Anna Charnaya Näköisjulkaisu teoksesta Venäjän federaation paikannimiä – oikeinkirjoitus- ja painotusopas, toimittaneet Pirjo Mikkonen, Martti Kahla, Ida Kempinen ja Anna Charnaya (Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 138, ISBN 952-5446-18-2, ISSN 0355-5437), Helsinki 2006) Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen verkkojulkaisuja 11 Copyright © Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus Helsinki 2010 URN:ISBN 978-952-5446-51 ISSN 1796-041X Venäjän federaation paikannimiä Kielenkäytön oppaita 6 VENÄJÄN FEDERAATION PAIKANNIMIÄ Oikeinkirjoitus- ja painotusopas Toimittaneet Pirjo Mikkonen, Martti Kahla, Ida Kempinen ja Anna Charnaya Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus 2006 Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskuksen julkaisuja 138 Taitto Matti Uusivirta ISSN 0355-5437 ISBN 952-5446-18-2 Kotimaisten kielten tutkimuskeskus Multiprint Helsinki 2006 SISÄLLYS Alkusanat 7 Johdanto 9 Venäjän translitterointikaava 11 Kielten nimitysten lyhenteet 12 Venäjän federaation tärkeimmät hallintoyksiköt 13 Venäjän federaation paikannimiä 15 Suomenkielisten nimien hakemisto 295 Liite 1: Ukrainan paikannimiä 331 Ukrainan translitterointikaava 332 Suomalaistettujen nimien hakemisto 346 Liite 2: Valko-Venäjän paikannimiä 347 Valkovenäjän translitterointikaava 348 Suomalaistettujen nimien hakemisto 357 Lähteet 359 ALKUSANAT Venäjän federaation paikannimiä -opasta on kaivattu pitkään, sillä sen edeltäjä, vuonna 1982 ilmestynyt Neuvostoliiton paikannimet.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of SOGAZ Insurance Group
    Annual Report of SOGAZ Insurance Group Annual Report of SOGAZ Insurance Group 2011 CONTENTS > A WORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ...................5 > A WORD FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD ....................6 01 > ABOUT SOGAZ INSURANCE GROUP ..............................................................8 Management .................................................................................................................................... 12 Position in the Insurance Market ................................................................................13 • Russian Insurance Market: 2011 Results .................................................................... 13 • Group Operation Results ......................................................................................... 16 02 > GROUP’S ACTIVITIES IN 2011 ........................................................................18 Insurance ...................................................................................................................20 • Property and Liability Insurance .................................................................................20 • Special Risk Insurance .............................................................................................24 • Personal Insurance .................................................................................................26 Sales Channel Development ....................................................................................................... 31
    [Show full text]