DOCSLIB.ORG

Multi-Link Iridium Satellite Data Communication System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multi-Link Iridium Satellite Data Communication System Multi-Link Iridium Satellite Data Communication System by Mohammad Abdul Jabbar Bachelor of Engineering, Electrical Engineering Osmania University, Hyderabad, India, 2001 Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Thesis Committee Chairperson: Dr. Victor S. Frost Dr. Glenn Prescott Dr. Christopher Allen Date Accepted: __________________ © Copyright 2004 by Mohammad Abdul Jabbar. All rights reserved. i i To my caring parents who are my inspiration To my graduate advisor who is a remarkable mentor ii i Acknowledgements I would like to extend my sincere and utmost gratitude to Dr. Victor Frost, my advisor and committee chair for his invaluable guidance and inspiration throughout my research. I would like to thank him for giving me the opportunity to work on this project, which is his brainchild. I would also like to thank Dr. Glenn Prescott and Dr. Chris Allen for being on my committee and helping me solve some of the technical problems faced during my research. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Tory Akins and the entire Greenland field team for their support during the field experiments, without which this work would not have been possible. Thanks are due to Dennis Sundermeyer who helped me with the packaging of the system and carrying out field experiments. I would like to thank Brett Becker for his help with the network design and his support throughout my research. Thanks are also due to Dan Depardo, who helped me with the setup in the wireless lab and provided valuable suggestions. I extend a special note of thanks to my friends, Nandish Chalishazar and Radha Krishna Mukkai for providing the much needed help during the Greenland experiments. I would like to express my gratitude to all my friends at KU for their moral support. iv Abstract Data and Internet access are integral for the success of any field research. The current state-of-the-art communication facilities, besides their wide penetration are still not available in many geographically remote regions including the Arctic and Antarctic regions. Research in the Polar Region involving data collection and telemetry has grown significantly over past few years. The commercial broadband satellite systems do not provide coverage at higher latitudes. The current geo-synchronous NASA satellites providing broadband access to Polar research have a limited visibility window at poles and need extremely large field equipment. Hence the need for a reliable, portable and easily available data/Internet access system is clearly evident. In this thesis, we present an Iridium based data communication system that can provide round the clock coverage from pole-to-pole. Since the Iridium satellite system provides a low bandwidth that is not sufficient to support most of the data applications, inverse multiplexing technique is used to combine multiple satellite links into a single logical channel of aggregate bandwidth. Multi-link point-to-point protocol is used to implement packet level inverse multiplexing. This technique effectively increases the available bandwidth per application to useable limits. Field experiments conducted at NGRIP, Greenland showed that the system is highly efficient and reliable. TCP performance analysis showed that the system has high throughput efficiency and high round trip time. An analysis of the observed TCP behavior is presented. v Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION……………….……………………………………………....1 1.1. Motivation…………………………………………………………...……..…2 1.2. Satellite data communication………..…………………………......................4 1.2.1. Commercial satellite systems……………………………………….....4 1.2.2. Special purpose satellite systems..…………………………………….7 1.2.3. Iridium satellite system…………….……………………………….....8 1.3. Project goals……………………………….………………………………...10 1.4. Accomplishments…………………………………………………..……….10 1.5. Thesis organization……………………………………………………...…..11 2. BACKGROUND………………………………………………………..………13 2.1. Iridium Satellite System………………………………………………….....13 2.1.1. Architecture……………………………………………..……………14 2.1.2. Constellation design………………………………………………….16 2.1.3. Multi-access scheme………………………………………………....19 2.1.4. System capacity…………………………………………………..….22 2.1.5. Network performance……………………………………………..…23 2.1.6. Hardware……………………………………………………..………26 2.1.7. Types of data services………………………………………………..27 2.1.8. Summary of Iridium………………………………………………….29 2.2. Supporting Technologies…………...……………………………………….30 2.2.1. Inverse Multiplexing………………...……………………………….31 2.2.2. Point-to-Point protocol……………………………...………………..33 2.2.3. Multi-link Point-to-Point protocol……………………………..…….35 3. SYSTEM DESIGN…………………………………………………………...…38 3.1. System design requirements………………………………………………...38 3.2. System design…………………………………………………………….....38 3.3. Protocol Stack…………………………………………………………….....40 v i 3.4. Network architecture………..…………………………………………..…..41 4. SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION……………..……….…………………..…...44 4.1. Four channel Iridium communication system………………………….…...44 4.2. Modem control……….……………………………………………….….….46 4.3. PPP link parameters and user authentication………………………..………47 4.4. Client-Server configuration………………………………………………....49 4.5. Autonomous system operation………………………………………..…….51 5. FIELD TESTS AND RESULTS……..…………………….…………………..54 5.1. Overview of field experiments…………………..………………………….54 5.2. General system performance…………………………………..……………57 5.2.1. Delay and loss.…………………………………………………..…...57 5.2.2. Throughput…………………………………………………..……….61 5.3. System reliability………………………………………………………..…..64 5.4. TCP performance over Iridium…………………………………………..….68 5.4.1. Related work………………………………………………………....68 5.4.2. Overview of TCP performance tests………………………………....70 5.4.3. TCP performance over a single Iridium link………………………...71 5.4.4. TCP performance over a multi-channel Iridium system………..……73 5.4.5. Performance degradation due to packet losses………………….…...79 5.4.6. Performance degradation due to call drops and link termination…....82 5.5. Mobile system performance…………………………………………..…….87 5.6. Applications………………………………………………………..………..89 6. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK……………………………..……...92 6.1. Conclusions…………………………………………………….…………....92 6.2. Future work……………………………………………………….………....93 REFERENCES……………….……………………………………….…………….93 APPENDIX A……………….…………………………………………………....…98 APPENDIX B………………..………………………………………………….....100 APPENDIX C...………………………..…………………………………………..101 vi i List of Figures Figure 1.1: Coverage map of Inmarsat……………………………..………................5 Figure 1.2: Coverage map of Globalstar………………………………........................6 Figure 1.3: Typical South Pole satellite visibility………………………………..........7 Figure 2.1: Iridium satellite………………………………..........................................13 Figure 2.2: An Iridium gateway ………………………………..................................15 Figure 2.3: Call hand-off between two satellites………………………………..…...17 Figure 2.4: Coverage area of a satellite…………………...........................................18 Figure 2.5: Iridium FDMA scheme………………….................................................19 Figure 2.6: The three panels of an Iridium phased array antenna…………..…….….20 Figure 2.7: Frequency reuse in Iridium…………………………................................21 Figure 2.8: Iridium TDMA scheme………………….................................................22 Figure 2.9: Iridium data modem and antenna…………………..................................26 Figure 2.10: Iridium-to-PSTN data connection…………………...............................27 Figure 2.11: Iridium-to-Iridium data call………………….........................................28 Figure 2.12: Traditional multiplexing…………………..............................................30 Figure 2.13: Inverse multiplexing…………………....................................................31 Figure 2.14: PPP phase diagram…………………......................................................34 Figure 2.15: Multi-link PPP operation………………….............................................36 Figure 3.1: Multi-channel data communication system…...……………....................39 Figure 3.2: Protocol stack of the remote and local system…………..........................40 Figure 3.3: Network architecture………….................................................................41 Figure 4.1: Four-channel Iridium communication system………….....................…..44 Figure 4.2: Four-channel Iridium communication unit and its antenna array….....…45 Figure 4.3: Software flow control diagram of the remote system………...…………50 Figure 4.4: Software flow control of the local system (server)…………..………….52 Figure 4.5: Modem flow control diagram…………....................................................53 Figure 5.1: Field implementation of multi-channel Iridium communication system..55 Figure 5.2: Field antenna setup……………………………........................................56 vi ii Figure 5.3: Mobile performance tests…………..........................................................56 Figure 5.4: Round trip time vs. time of the day…………...........................................59 Figure 5.5: Variation of RTT with respect to packet size…………............................60 Figure 5.6: Variation of normalized RTT with respect to packet size…………….....61 Figure 5.7: Plot of Throughput vs. Number of modems…………..............................63 Figure 5.8: Call drop pattern of the first modem during the 10th July 24-hour test….65 Figure 5.9: Availability of modems during the 10th July 24-hour tests…………..….65 Figure 5.10: Call drop pattern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President, 1976 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 19 76 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1976 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I. Summary of U.S. Aeronautics and Space Ac- X. National Academy of Sciences, National Acad- tivities of 1976 _________________________ 1 emy .of Engineering, National Research 67 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ 1 Council _______________________________ Space _______________________________ 1 Introduction _ _ _____ _ ______ __ _ ______ __ 67 Aeronautics __ __________ ____ __________ 4 Aerospace Science _ _ _ __ - _ _ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ - - - 67 The Heritage ________________________ 5 Space Applications .................... 69 .. 70 11. National Aeronautics and Space Administration G Aerospace Engineering _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ - - - - - 6 Education ____________________-------71 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 72 Applications to Earth __________________ 6 XI. Office of Telecommunications Policy __i____-- 10 Introduction __ __ __________ _____ ____ __ 72 Science ______________________________ 72 Space Transportation __________________ 15 International Satellite Systems _____ _ _____ 18 Direct Broadcast Satellites ______________ 72 Space Research and Technology _ _ ___ ____ 73 Tracking and Data Acquisition __________ 19 Frequency Management _____ __ _ __ _ ___ __ 20 Domestic Satellite Applications __________ 73 International Affairs ___________________ 74 User Affairs ________________________ 23 XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs Written Historical and Descriptive
    CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY HAER FL-8-B BUILDING AE HAER FL-8-B (John F. Kennedy Space Center, Hanger AE) Cape Canaveral Brevard County Florida PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama St. NW Atlanta, GA 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD CAPE CANAVERAL AIR FORCE STATION, MISSILE ASSEMBLY BUILDING AE (Hangar AE) HAER NO. FL-8-B Location: Hangar Road, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station (CCAFS), Industrial Area, Brevard County, Florida. USGS Cape Canaveral, Florida, Quadrangle. Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates: E 540610 N 3151547, Zone 17, NAD 1983. Date of Construction: 1959 Present Owner: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Present Use: Home to NASA’s Launch Services Program (LSP) and the Launch Vehicle Data Center (LVDC). The LVDC allows engineers to monitor telemetry data during unmanned rocket launches. Significance: Missile Assembly Building AE, commonly called Hangar AE, is nationally significant as the telemetry station for NASA KSC’s unmanned Expendable Launch Vehicle (ELV) program. Since 1961, the building has been the principal facility for monitoring telemetry communications data during ELV launches and until 1995 it processed scientifically significant ELV satellite payloads. Still in operation, Hangar AE is essential to the continuing mission and success of NASA’s unmanned rocket launch program at KSC. It is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) under Criterion A in the area of Space Exploration as Kennedy Space Center’s (KSC) original Mission Control Center for its program of unmanned launch missions and under Criterion C as a contributing resource in the CCAFS Industrial Area Historic District.
    [Show full text]
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Worldwide Satellite Magazine April 2013 Maritime SATCOM Space
    Worldwide Satellite Magazine April 2013 SatMagazine Maritime SATCOM Space Engineering SatMagazine. April 2013, Vol. 6, #1 Publishing Operations Authors + Contributors Silvano Payne, Publisher + Writer Jan Einar Bringedal Hartley G. Lesser, Editorial Director Patrick Decool Pattie Waldt, Executive Editor Chris Forrester Martin Jarrold Jill Durfee, Sales Director, Editorial Assistant Jos Heyman Simon Payne, Development Director Hartley Lesser Donald McGee, Production Manager Reinhold Lüppen Dan Makinster, Technical Advisor Bert Sadtler Chris Forrester, Senior Contributing Editor Pattie Waldt Alan Gottlieb, Senior Contributing Editor Bob Gough, Senior Contributing Editor Jos Heyman, Senior Contributing Editor Giles Peeters, Senior Contributing Editor Mike Antonovich, Senior Contributing Editor Richard Dutchik, Contributing Editor Bert Sadtler, Contributing Editor We reserve the right to edit all submitted materials to meet Published monthly by our content guidelines, as well as for grammar or to move SatNews Publishers articles to an alternative issue to accommodate publication 800 Siesta Way space requirements or removed due to space restrictions. Sonoma, CA 95476 USA Submission of content does not constitute acceptance of said Phone: (707) 939-9306 material by SatNews Publishers. Edited materials may, or may Fax: (707) 838-9235 not, be returned to author and/or company for review prior © 2013 SatNews Publishers to publication. The views expressed in SatNews Publishers’ various publications do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of SatNews Publishers. All rights reserved. All included imagery is courtesy of, and copyright to, the respective companies or named individuals. { Prove it. SatMagazine, MilsatMagazine and SatNews are always seeking articles covering the SATCOM and related industries, features that would Think be of interest to our thousands of global readers.
    [Show full text]
  • And Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness
    MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 2012 This report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness, was completed at the request of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/od/ opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN AntarctICA THROUGH INCREASED LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS REport OF THE U.S. AntarctIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL AT THE REQUEST OF THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY AND THE NatIONAL SCIENCE FoundatION WASHINGTON, D.C. JULY 2012 U.S. AntarctIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON, D.C. July 23, 2012 Dr. John P. Holdren Dr. Subra Suresh Assistant to the President for Science and Technology Director & Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy National Science Foundation Executive Office of the President of the United States 4201 Wilson Boulevard Washington, DC 20305 Arlington, VA 22230 Dear Dr. Holdren and Dr. Suresh: The members of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel are pleased to submit herewith our final report entitled More and Better Science in Antarctica through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. Not only is the U.S. logistics system supporting our nation’s activities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean the essential enabler for our presence and scientific accomplish- ments in that region, it is also the dominant consumer of the funds allocated to those endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos. 13-1231 & 13-1232 Washington, D.C. 20530
    USCA Case #13-1231 Document #1472126 Filed: 12/23/2013 Page 1 of 98 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NOS. 13-1231 & 13-1232 SPECTRUM FIVE LLC, APPELLANT, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE. SPECTRUM FIVE LLC, PETITIONER, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS. ON APPEAL FROM AND PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WILLIAM J. BAER JONATHAN B. SALLET ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL ROBERT B. NICHOLSON JACOB M. LEWIS ROBERT J. WIGGERS ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL ATTORNEYS MATTHEW J. DUNNE UNITED STATES COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 (202) 418-1740 USCA Case #13-1231 Document #1472126 Filed: 12/23/2013 Page 2 of 98 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), Appellee/Respondent the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and Respondent the United States certify as follows: 1. Parties. The parties appearing before the FCC were DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC; EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation; the Government of Bermuda; Radiocommunications Agency Netherlands; SES S.A.; and Spectrum Five LLC. The parties appearing before this Court are Appellant/Petitioner Spectrum Five LLC; Appelle/Respondent the FCC; Respondent the United States in No. 13-1232 only; and Intervenor EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation. 2. Ruling under review. The ruling under review is Memorandum Opinion and Order, EchoStar Satellite Operating Company; Application for Special Temporary Authority Relating to Moving the EchoStar 6 Satellite from the 77° W.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1981 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Con tents Page Page Summary ................................ 1 Department of Agriculture ................. 57 Communications ...................... 1 Federal Communications Commission ........ 58 Earth’s Resources and Environment ...... 2 CommunicationsSatellites .............. 58 Space Science ........................ 3 Experiments and Studies ............... 59 Space Transportation .................. 4 Department of Transportation .............. 61 International Activities ................ 5 Aviation Safety ....................... 61 Aeronautics .......................... 6 Environmental Research ............... 63 National Aeronautics and Space Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control ... 64 Administration ..................... 8 Environmental Protection Agency ........... 66 Applications to the Earth ............... 8 National Science Foundation ................ 67 Science .............................. 13 Smithsonian Institution .................... 68 Space Transportation .................. 19 Spacesciences ........................ 68 Space Research and Technology ......... 23 Lunar Research ...................... 69 Space Tracking and Data Services ........ 25 Planetary Research .................... 70 Aeronautical
    [Show full text]
  • Our First Quarter Century of Achievement ... Just the Beginning I
    NASA Press Kit National Aeronautics and 251hAnniversary October 1983 Space Administration 1958-1983 >\ Our First Quarter Century of Achievement ... Just the Beginning i RELEASE ND: 83-132 September 1983 NOTE TO EDITORS : NASA is observing its 25th anniversary. The space agency opened for business on Oct. 1, 1958. The information attached sumnarizes what has been achieved in these 25 years. It was prepared as an aid to broadcasters, writers and editors who need historical, statistical and chronological material. Those needing further information may call or write: NASA Headquarters, Code LFD-10, News and Information Branch, Washington, D. C. 20546; 202/755-8370. Photographs to illustrate any of this material may be obtained by calling or writing: NASA Headquarters, Code LFD-10, Photo and Motion Pictures, Washington, D. C. 20546; 202/755-8366. bQy#qt&*&Mary G. itzpatrick Acting Chief, News and Information Branch Public Affairs Division Cover Art Top row, left to right: ffComnandDestruct Center," 1967, Artist Paul Calle, left; ?'View from Mimas," 1981, features on a Saturnian satellite, by Artist Ron Miller, center; ftP1umes,*tSTS- 4 launch, Artist Chet Jezierski,right; aeronautical research mural, Artist Bob McCall, 1977, on display at the Visitors Center at Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, Calif. iii OUR FIRST QUARTER CENTER OF ACHIEVEMENT A-1 -3 SPACE FLIGHT B-1 - 19 SPACE SCIENCE c-1 - 20 SPACE APPLICATIQNS D-1 - 12 AERONAUTICS E-1 - 10 TRACKING AND DATA ACQUISITION F-1 - 5 INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS G-1 - 5 TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION H-1 - 5 NASA INSTALLATIONS 1-1 - 9 NASA LAUNCH RECORD J-1 - 49 ASTRONAUTS K-1 - 13 FINE ARTS PRQGRAM L-1 - 7 S IGN I F ICANT QUOTAT IONS frl-1 - 4 NASA ADvIINISTRATORS N-1 - 7 SELECTED NASA PHOTOGRAPHS 0-1 - 12 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the President
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1977 Activities NOTE TO READERS: ALL PRINTED PAGES ARE INCLUDED, UNNUMBERED BLANK PAGES DURING SCANNING AND QUALITY CONTROL CHECK HAVE BEEN DELETED Aeronautics and Space Report of the President 1977 Activities National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Table of Contents Page Page I. Summary of U.S. Aeronautics and VI. Department of the Interior __________ 66 Space Activities of 1977 __________ 1 Introduction ____ __________ _ _ __ 66 Introduction _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - 1 Earth Resources Observation Communications _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ - 1 Systems Program _____________ 66 Earth's Resources _______ _______ 2 National Cartographic Informa- Space Science __________________ 5 tion Center __________________ 67 Transportation _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ __ 7 Monitoring the Environment ___ 67 Space Energy __________________ 11 Research _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ 68 11. National.. Aeronautics and Space International Activities _________ 69 Administration _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - 13 VII. Department of Transportation _______ 70 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 13 Introduction _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ 70 Applications to Earth _ _______ _ __ 13 Air Safety ..................... 70 Science _______________________ 18 Air Traffic Control and Air Space Transportation _ _______ __ _ 22 Navigation - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ 72 Space Research and Technology- - 26 OST Research Support __________ 7.3 Tracking and Data Acquisition __ 27 NASA Energy Programs ________ 28 Aeronautical Research and Appendixes Development _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ 29 111.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 17 December 1999
    United Nations A/AC.105/734 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 December 1999 Original: English Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Disposal of satellites in geosynchronous orbit Report by the Secretariat Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ....................................................... 1-2 2 II. Standards and recommendations on geosynchonous satellite disposal ........ 3-8 2 III. Examples of the GSO disposal policy .................................. 9-15 3 A. Intelsat....................................................... 10 3 B. Canadian Space Agency ......................................... 11-12 4 C. Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales................................ 13 4 D. European Space Agency ........................................ 14 4 E. EUMETSAT.................................................. 15 4 IV. Situation near the geostationary orbit................................... 16-20 4 V. Conclusions ....................................................... 21 5 Annex. Statistical data....................................................................... 6 V.99-91115 (E) A/AC.105/734 I. Introduction (b) Every reasonable effort should be made to shorten the lifetime of debris in the transfer orbit; 1. At its forty-second session, the Committee on the (c) A geostationary satellite at the end of its life Peaceful Uses of Outer Space agreed1 that the Scientific should be transferred, before complete exhaustion of its and Technical Subcommittee, at its thirty-seventh session, propellant, to a supersynchronous
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +49 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by T. Flohrer Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00086-OPS-GR Issue 14 Revision 1 Date of Issue 17 February 2012 Status Issued Document Type TN Distribution open European Space Agency Agence spatiale européenne Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2011. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 70 deg) is analysed. From 1234 objects for which orbital data are available, 406 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 629 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 18 whose status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 74 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1307 . During 2011 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Thirteen of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, one of those below the GEO protected region. Three spacecraft were reorbited too low. We identified one spacecraft that seems to be abandoned or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all in 2009 and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICATION of GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS ISSUE 13 Produced with the DISCOS Database
    EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY EUROPEAN SPACE OPERATIONS CENTRE GROUND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Space Debris Office GEN-DB-LOG-00074-OPS-GR CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS ISSUE 13 by T. Flohrer, R. Choc, and B. Bastida Produced with the DISCOS Database February 2011 ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany 3 Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2010. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 30 deg) is analysed. From 1202 objects for which orbital data are available, 397 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 622 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 172 are in a libration orbit and 11 whose status could not be determined. Fur- thermore, there are 72 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been catalogued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1274. During 2010 at least sixteen spacecraft reached end-of-life. Eleven of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, of which one spacecraft was reorbited with a perigee of 241 km - it is not yet clear if it will enter the 200-km protected zone around GEO or not -, four spacecraft were reorbited too low and at least one spacecraft did not or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all and is now librating inside the geostationary ring.
    [Show full text]