A Comprehensive Review of the Covalent Immobilization of Biomolecules Onto Electrospun Nanofibers
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
nanomaterials Review A Comprehensive Review of the Covalent Immobilization of Biomolecules onto Electrospun Nanofibers Soshana Smith 1,* , Katarina Goodge 1 , Michael Delaney 2, Ariel Struzyk 2, Nicole Tansey 1 and Margaret Frey 1 1 Department of Fiber Science and Apparel Design, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] (K.G.); [email protected] (N.T.); [email protected] (M.F.) 2 Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 October 2020; Accepted: 21 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Abstract: Biomolecule immobilization has attracted the attention of various fields such as fine chemistry and biomedicine for their use in several applications such as wastewater, immunosensors, biofuels, et cetera. The performance of immobilized biomolecules depends on the substrate and the immobilization method utilized. Electrospun nanofibers act as an excellent substrate for immobilization due to their large surface area to volume ratio and interconnectivity. While biomolecules can be immobilized using adsorption and encapsulation, covalent immobilization offers a way to permanently fix the material to the fiber surface resulting in high efficiency, good specificity, and excellent stability. This review aims to highlight the various covalent immobilization techniques being utilized and their benefits and drawbacks. These methods typically fall into two categories: (1) direct immobilization and (2) use of crosslinkers. Direct immobilization techniques are usually simple and utilize the strong electrophilic functional groups on the nanofiber. While crosslinkers are used as an intermediary between the nanofiber substrate and the biomolecule, with some crosslinkers being present in the final product and others simply facilitating the reactions. We aim to provide an explanation of each immobilization technique, biomolecules commonly paired with said technique and the benefit of immobilization over the free biomolecule. Keywords: nanofiber; biomolecule; enzyme; covalent immobilization; crosslinker; electrospinning 1. Introduction Nanofibers are favored as a substrate for biomolecule immobilization because of their high surface to volume ratio, low barrier to diffusion and interconnected pore network [1,2]. These factors allow researchers to have a much higher biomolecule loading compared to other polymer substrates such as beads and films. Nanofibers have been used to immobilize a variety of biomolecules such as enzymes, DNA, aptamers and proteins. The porous nature of the membrane allows for easy diffusion to the nanofiber surface leading to greater biomolecule retention on the large available surface area [3,4]. Researchers have found enzyme activity retention was inversely proportional to fiber diameter and attributed this enhanced activity retention to reduced interactions between molecules on the surface of the material and diminished boundary layers for diffusion [5–8]. In addition to improved activity retention, researchers have also noted enhanced pH, temperature and storage stability [9], as well as increased cell capture, growth and proliferation [10] when utilizing nanofibers for biomolecule retention. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2142; doi:10.3390/nano10112142 www.mdpi.com/journal/nanomaterials Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2142 2 of 39 ThereNanomaterials are many 2020, 10 ways, x to manufacture the needed nanofibers such as self-assembly, phase separation2 of 40 and electrospinning [11]. Electrospinning presents a facile, inexpensive way to make highly tunable There are many ways to manufacture the needed nanofibers such as self-assembly, phase nanofibersseparation allowing and electrospi researchersnning great [11]. controlElectrospinnin over matg presents thickness a facile, and inexpensive composition, way surface to make area to volumehighly ratio, tunable and intra- nanofibers/inter- allowi pore sizeng researchers distribution. great The control usual over electrospinning mat thickness set-up and composition, consists of three mainsurface parts: aarea syringe to volume filled withratio, polymerand intra-/inter- solution, po are grounded size distribution. collector, The and usual a voltage electrospinning source providing set- electricalup consists charge of to three the syringemain parts: needle. a syringe Using filled a pump, with polymer the spinning solution, solution a grounded is gradually collector, forced and a from the syringevoltage intosource the providing needle. Theelectrical application charge to of the the syringe electric needle. charge Using on the a pump, needle the creates spinning an solution electric field gradientis gradually between forced the needle from the and syringe grounded into collector.the needle. This The diapplicationfference creates of the electric a pendant-like charge on droplet the of the spinningneedle creates fluid calledan electric a Taylor field cone,gradient which between once the ejected needle begins and grounded to whip andcollector. elongate This untildifference it reaches creates a pendant-like droplet of the spinning fluid called a Taylor cone, which once ejected begins the collector plate. The resultant fibers have a large surface area with the typical specific surface area to whip and elongate until it reaches the collector plate. The resultant fibers have a large surface area being 10 m2/g for fiber diameters around 500 nm and 1000 m2/g for diameters around 50 nm [12]. with the typical specific surface area being 10 m2/g for fiber diameters around 500 nm and 1000 m2/g The finalfor diameters fibers can around have 50 a varietynm [12]. of The morphologies final fibers can including have a variety beaded, of aligned,morphologies hollow, including core-shell, flat-ribbonbeaded, and aligned, porous hollow, (Figure core-shell,1a–f). flat-ribbon The final and fiber porous morphology (Figure 1a–f). and The properties final fiber are morphology impacted by variousand polymer properties parameters are impacted such by asva typerious ofpolymer polymer parameters used, polymer such as moleculartype of polymer weight, used, surface polymer tension, conductivitymolecular and weight, volatility surface of tension, the spinning conductivity solution. and Operationvolatility of conditionsthe spinning such solution. as applied Operation voltage, feed rate,conditions spinneret such diameteras applied andvoltage, distance feed rate, between spinneret the diameter spinneret and and distance the collecting between substratethe spinneret are also significant.and the Finally, collecting one substrate must consider are also environmentalsignificant. Finally, factors one must such consider as air temperature, environmental humidity factors and air speed.such as Mastering air temperature, a well-balanced humidity and application air speed. Mastering of all these a well-balanced factors has allowed application researchers of all these to use factors has allowed researchers to use electrospinning as an easy method for creating substrates for electrospinning as an easy method for creating substrates for biomolecule immobilization. biomolecule immobilization. a) b) 50 μm 1 μm c) d) 161 nm 347 nm 2 μm 100 nm e) f) 40 μm 5μm FigureFigure 1. Different 1. Different fiber morphologiesfiber morphologies achieved achieved by various by various researchers research usingers using the electrospinning the electrospinning technique: (a) beaded;technique: (b) aligned; (a) beaded (c) [13]; hollow; (b) aligned (d) core-sheath; [14]; (c) hollow (e) flat [15]; ribbon; (d) core-sheath (f) porous. [16]; Reproduced (e) flat ribbon with [17]; permission (f) porous [18]. from [13], Copyright John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007. Reproduced from [14], Copyright Elsevier, 2012. ReproducedImmobilization from [15], of Copyright biomolecules John Wileyonto nanofibers & Sons, Inc., ca 2007.n be done Reproduced in a variety from [of16 ways:], Copyright encapsulation Springer Nature,[19–22], 2011.adsorption Reproduced [23–28] from and[ covalent17,18], Copyright bonding. Elsevier, Encapsulated 2008, 2007. biomolecules are not attached to the nanofiber surface but instead entrapped in the polymer network. The desired biomolecule is added Immobilizationto the spinning solution of biomolecules and becomes onto immobilized nanofibers can in bethe done polymer in a varietymatrix during of ways: the encapsulation electrospinning [19 –22], adsorption [23–28] and covalent bonding. Encapsulated biomolecules are not attached to the nanofiber surface but instead entrapped in the polymer network. The desired biomolecule is added to the Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2142 3 of 39 Nanomaterials 2020, 10, x 3 of 40 spinning solution and becomes immobilized in the polymer matrix during the electrospinning process. Thisprocess. method This works method well forworks immobilizing well for biocatalysts,immobilizing such biocatalysts, as enzymes, such as wellas enzymes, as encapsulating as well drugsas andencapsulating vitamins. This drugs method and improvesvitamins. enzyme This method stability im asproves well asenzyme reduces stability leaching as into well the as surrounding reduces solutionleaching or into denaturation the surrounding of the enzyme. solution However,or denaturation because of thethe biomolecule enzyme. However, is encapsulated because inthe the nanofiber,biomolecule high is mass encapsulated transfer in resistance the nanofiber, leads high to large mass amounts transfer ofresi thestance biomolecule