TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of Acronyms...... iv

INTRODUCTION...... 1

Building Afghan Ownership...... 2

Strategy...... 2

Lessons for the Future ...... 3

Cross-Cutting Priorities for 2002 ...... 3

Expected Programme Outcomes ...... 4

Measuring our Impact...... 4

Ensuring Capacity to Respond ...... 5

Financial Requirements ...... 5

Contingencies ...... 5

Table 1: Agency Funding Requirements - By Sector...... 7 Table 2: Agency Funding Requested - By Sector ...... 11 Table 3: Summary of Major Donor Contributions to Donor Alert...... 12 Table 4: List of Participating NGOs - By Sector...... 13

Annex 1 - UNHCR: Sectoral and Geographic Breakdown of Total Budget ...... 16

Annex 2 - WFP: Sectoral Breakdown of Funding Requested ...... 17

Annex 3 - User Guide to the Activity Tracking Information Management System, AIMS...... 18

iii LIST OF ACRONYMS

AIMS Afghanistan Information Management Service

CA Consolidated Appeal CDAP Comprehensive Disabled Afghans Project

FAO Food and Agriculture Organization

IA Interim Authority ICT Information and Communications Technology IDP Internally Displaced Person ILO International Labour Organization IOM International Organization for Migration IRIN Integrated Regional Information Network ISAF International Security Assistance Force ITAP Immediate and Transitional Assistance Programme for the Afghan People

JLC Joint Logistics Centre

NFI Non-Food Item NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

PCP Principled Common Programming

SMU Strategic Monitoring Unit

TA Transitional Authority

UN United Nations UNCHS United Nations Commission on Human Settlements (Habitat) UNCO United Nations Coordinator’s Office UNDCP United Nations Drug Control Programme UNDESA United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNFPA United Nations Populations Fund UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNIC United Nations Information Centre UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNIFEM United Nations Development Fund for Women UNOCHA United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs UNOPS United Nations Office for Project Services UNSECOORD United Nations Security Coordinator

WFP Word Food Programme WHO World Health Organization

iv INTRODUCTION an important vehicle for this: the Immediate and Transitional Assistance Programme for the Afghan At the International Conference on Reconstruction People 2002 (ITAP). The ITAP seeks to build a Assistance to Afghanistan held in Tokyo in coherent vision for assistance that will be January, the international community signalled undertaken in Afghanistan in 2002. It incorporates loudly and clearly its commitment to provide the sectoral strategies that will begin the recovery resources required to secure peace in Afghanistan, process, as well as ongoing activities aimed at and to begin the long, complex task of recovery. ensuring that urgent humanitarian needs are met. Pledges totalling more than US$ 4.5 billion were The ITAP is a touchstone for future agency efforts made against the Preliminary Needs Assessment to build integrated programming in Afghanistan. conducted by the World Bank, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB), which provides a This document should be seen as a companion comprehensive framework for support over the to the ITAP. It is an update of requirements for coming five years. Agency work is now under the funding of projects that have evolved from way on more detailed sectoral needs assessments, the sectoral strategies and objectives outlined to identify priority activities in 2002 for under the ITAP1, based on actual activities to programmes focused on sustainable development. be undertaken in 2002 and for which an These activities will be developed in the months agency is ready to assume immediate ahead through close and substantive partnership implementation responsibility. Detailed with the Interim Authority (IA) and the successor proposals for these activities are available on a Transitional Authority (TA). database maintained by the Afghanistan Information Management Service (AIMS)2. Meanwhile, it is critical that the enormous and pressing humanitarian, recovery and reconstruction The overall funding requirements are needs of millions of Afghans are met. To this summarised below: end, and in parallel to the Tokyo Conference, the United Nations (UN) presented

TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED BY SECTOR* Sector Funds Required US$ Food Assistance 336,778,238 Food Security, Agriculture & Environment 59,613,613 Nutrition 17,979,644 Health 136,315,283 Water & Sanitation 42,998,477 Shelter, Housing & Urban Renewal 77,978,771 Protection & Promotion of Human Rights 33,961,582 Gender 15,752,214 Mine Action 22,979,241 Education 86,121,869 Refugees, Returnees & Reintegration 150,013,481 Governance 83,242,746 Culture 10,000,000 Media 7,947,283 Employment 15,778,567 Infrastructure 58,943,453 Coordination & Support Services 24,426,981 TOTAL 1,180,831,443 *Financial requirements for the Trust Fund for salary support to civil servants are not included.

1 In keeping with the timeframes for the ITAP, this document also takes into account the requirements of the Donor Alert (1 October 2001-30 March 2002). 2 Project proposals from which financial requirements are calculated are accessible on the AIMS database, reached through the AIMS website (www.hic.org.pk). Proposals can be viewed by sector, agency and geographic location. User guidelines are at Annex 3.

1 The international community has a critical role
A strategy for livelihoods in rural areas to tap to play in supporting the new Afghan the potential of Afghans in agriculture, administration in building a brighter future for horticulture and livestock;
all Afghans. Expectations are high: Afghans Restoration of basic services with particular are anxious to see a peace dividend from the attention to education for both girls and boys. Bonn Agreement, as well as tangible evidence The ITAP strategies are broadly in keeping with of the international community’s commitment the above priorities. These will be further adjusted to peace, justice and recovery. But the as the IA refines its reconstruction agenda. challenges are enormous. Afghanistan lies devastated by 23 years of war, missed In order to finalise this document, a series of development opportunities, a huge human briefings and sectoral consultations focusing on the rights deficit, massive displacement and the ITAP strategies were held with the IA in Kabul in worst drought in living memory. early February. These consultations, in which UN agencies and Non-Governmental Organisations While the current shift to the reconstruction agenda (NGOs) participated, introduced the sectoral in Afghanistan is long overdue, donors are urged to strategies but did not allow scope for substantive respond in a timely and generous fashion to this discussions with line ministries on the projects update, in order to meet immediate humanitarian included in each sector. In addition, project and recovery, as well as reconstruction proposals included in this document have been requirements. It is imperative that the new peace handed to the IA for further consideration. While in Afghanistan does not falter owing to lack of the IA has indicated its support for the overall resources to meet critical basic needs for millions programme, it also emphasized during the of people in the country. consultations the importance of Afghan ownership. More consultation is now required, to ensure that programmes are appropriate to the IA’s priorities Building Afghan Ownership and capacity. For example, it is expected that support and assistance will be sought by the IA for Traditionally, Consolidated Appeals (CA) for the Commissions on Civil Service, Judiciary and Afghanistan have been finalised without the Human Rights once these have been formally participation of the central authorities. The established. This update thus provides a snapshot situation today is radically different, and the of a new process of consultation with the IA. It assistance community is now fully committed to represents a first effort to match identified needs partnership with the new administration. For its with IA priorities and capacities. part, the IA’s repeated commitment to accountability and transparency in the utilisation of It is expected that both the strategies and the external assistance is most welcome, as is its portfolios of projects will need to be revised at pledge to address immediately structural poverty regular intervals during 2002, as progress is and rights issues and to promote social justice and periodically reviewed. Some projects will be sustainability. taken out and new ones included to take account of the evolving situation on the ground. Projects of a As indicated in Tokyo, the IA’s priorities are: longer-term nature will be developed with the IA, and the TA; these will need to be approved and
Emergency programmes to address the needs financial resources mobilised. Further updates of of Afghans who have suffered human rights financial requirements, based on such reviews, will violations and who are internally displaced in be provided at regular intervals in 2002. nine areas of the country3;
A local empowerment programme that allows communities to manage their own resources; Strategy
Programmes addressing the specific needs of The agencies that have participated in the women, including employment; preparation of detailed strategies included in the
An urban reconstruction programme to restore ITAP are fully committed to consolidating peace in utilities and support municipal authorities; Afghanistan. The most fundamental need in Afghanistan today is for stability: people need confidence in their leaders and in the future. The new administration requires the resources to instill 3 The Shomali Plains; Dari-suf Yakawlang, Central Bamyan; this confidence. Khawajaghar-Hazarbajh; Takhar-Badakhshan; Mazar region; Herat- Ghor; Kandahar, Paktia-Paktika; Eastern Nangahar.

2 The programmes in this document all work towards the overarching goal of building security Central to the ITAP’s strategy is the commitment and stability by ensuring tangible short-term to build national capacity. The capacity of the results and beginning the process of longer-term administration to ensure the security of its people – capacity development. There are three economic, social and physical – must be components to this goal, reflected in the ITAP strengthened. Recovery programmes should build strategies: the capacity of communities and the administration to address humanitarian assistance and • Supporting the efforts of the Afghan development assistance needs, including project administration to address immediate and management skills. Capacity development, both longer term needs and to coordinate the within the ministries and the coordination agency inputs of a wide range of national and at central and provincial levels, will be a core international partners aspect of the ITAP, so that national partners are • Meeting humanitarian needs able to manage recovery, as well as set policy, o Increasing access to food and basic guidelines, protocols and strategic direction. services o Facilitating the return of refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs), Lessons for the Future through assisted return projects and quick The experience of the aid community during the impact projects in communities of return past decade provides much on which to build. In o Accelerating the clearance of mines and particular, the Principled Common Programming unexploded ordnance (PCP) approach developed since 1997, provides a • Starting recovery solid structural base for the challenges ahead. o Providing a quick injection of capital and Through PCP structures such as the Afghanistan technical knowledge Programming Body and Regional Coordination
to rebuild communities Bodies, agencies have sought wherever possible to
to contribute to the durable integration move beyond humanitarian objectives, to build the of returnees coping mechanisms of communities, to strengthen
to protect rights capacity to deliver basic services, to empower
to create learning environments people to build sustainable livelihoods and to
to create jobs and generate income protect the rights of Afghans. Lessons learnt that o Empowering Afghans to manage their are important for the future include: recovery o Building the capacity of the IA to deliver • The need for an integrated, inclusive and services and to develop stable, transparent principled programming approach; and equitable governance structures • The ongoing need for strong programme coordination and policy coherence under the These components are mutually reinforcing. After emerging assistance structure; three years of drought and decades of conflict, • The concrete benefits of strong donor people’s assets are seriously depleted and their coordination on substantive policy and coping mechanisms are severely strained. Millions programming issues; of Afghans have been forced to leave their homes, • The need to harmonise assistance strategies seeking refuge in camps inside and outside with the priorities and capacities of Afghans. Afghanistan (or with communities that are already struggling for survival). A fourth year of drought, now a distinct possibility, would hamper plans for millions of Afghans, inside and outside the Cross-Cutting Priorities for 2002 country, who wish to return home. Even if the The assistance community’s priorities for 2002 are drought eases and security improves, humanitarian stated in the sectoral strategies included in the needs will remain high on the agenda well into ITAP. From these, several critical priorities 2003. emerge for 2002:

While humanitarian aid is urgently required, basic • Food security will be addressed in a first services need to be re-established. Schools need to instance by the provision of food assistance to restart, health systems need to function, water and over nine million Afghans. Longer-term sanitation services need to be rebuilt. People need security will be supported through provision of to find their own means of livelihood.

3 agricultural and livestock inputs and technical assistance programme to peace building. assistance. Mechanisms and strategies for prevention of conflict will be strengthened. • Support to the return and initial reintegration of up to 1.2 million refugees and • Reducing illicit drug production and IDPs is a primary objective in 2002. Most addressing growing drug abuse require a sectors include projects to improve conditions comprehensive approach involving many in areas of return. The special needs of female- sectors including food security, health, headed households will be addressed. The education, communication, reintegration, Refugees, Returnees, and Reintegration sector income generation, and law enforcement. outlines a range of more specific returnee- oriented activities. Expected Programme Outcomes • Jobs and income generation are key priorities Activities proposed within the framework of the for peace, addressed by many sector activities. ITAP will contribute to: Specific Employment sector projects will help build the administration’s capacity in • Mitigating humanitarian crisis, owing to employment policy and labour market drought, displacement and depletion of assets; analysis. Promoting the return of qualified • Increased access to basic services – health, Afghans through job identification will build education, water and sanitation; national professional capacity. • Enhanced food security; • • Successful return of up to 1.2 million refugees Gender equity is an explicit priority for 2002. and IDPs, relieving current pressure on host Activities will support the administration to communities both within Afghanistan and in improve the status of women, specifically their Iran and Pakistan; participation in political life, the media and the • The emergence of nascent community economy, and their access to basic services. structures of governance; Actions are likewise directed at building the • Performance of essential functions of capacity of the administration and of women’s government, including the specific function of groups to redress existing legislative and other coordination; barriers, which limit their status and • opportunities. Building a secure environment for all Afghans, particularly women; • • Protection of human rights is central. The Reducing poppy cultivation, through strategies 2002 programme will support rights to health, to more effectively reduce drug production and education, shelter and a decent standard of abuse. living. Specific activities will support the protection of the rights of all Afghans, and Finally, an equitable, robust and constructive promote rights based programming, training, partnership with Afghans will have been advocacy and awareness raising in the established as the building block for achieving assistance community, the administration, sustainable recovery. local associations and the media.

• Community empowerment and Measuring our Impact participation are essential ingredients for The scope and complexity of integrated sustained recovery. Multi-sector assistance programming require a stronger effort to measure and specific community-based governance progress towards expected outcomes. Greater projects will support community stability in Afghanistan will enable aid partners empowerment. Given their strength in this and the authorities to better understand needs, and area, NGOs will work with UN agencies and strengthen capacity to monitor and evaluate the authorities to support community activities. Agencies will match the IA’s initiatives. commitment to transparency and accountability.

• Efforts to mend relationships and restore Renewed efforts will be made to systematically trust between communities and individuals, assess needs in priority areas – both drought- and and between authorities and civil society, conflict related. Greater knowledge is required of will enhance the overall contribution of this how Afghans cope in crisis, so that programmes

4 can be adapted to build on, not trample, these In 2002, agencies participating in this update are mechanisms. Agencies participating in this planning to implement programmes with a total programme will give priority to developing more value of US$ 1.7 billion. Against this, systematic programming frameworks which organisations have available a total of US$ 600 include monitoring, evaluation and learning tools million, which includes: contributions to UN for programme planning, implementation and agencies through the Donor Alert (US$ 416 reporting. Though these may prove difficult, basic million); funds available to NGOs (US$ 78 indicators for each sectoral programme must be million); and funds carried forward by UN identified and shared to better measure progress of agencies (US$ 106 million). agencies during the year, and to ensure accountability. Thus, US$ 1.1 billion is requested to fully fund the planned programmes. Of this total amount requested, UN agencies require over US$ 1 billion Ensuring Capacity to Respond or 85%. The balance of US$ 170 million, or 15% Some 18 UN agencies and several hundred4 is being requested by participating NGOs. national and international NGOs are currently working in Afghanistan, and with the change in NGO proposals in this document represent only a political circumstances and growing needs, there relatively small proportion of overall NGO activity will be many more new actors involved in in Afghanistan. Regrettably, many of the new humanitarian, recovery and reconstruction efforts. actors have not forwarded their proposals to AIMS. Bilateral donors, the coalition forces and the Attempts will be made to provide a more complete International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) are summary of NGO activities in future reviews and now directly involved in the implementation of updates of the ITAP. assistance projects. The potential for duplication and confusion is high and the IA’s own capacity to Some variation exists in the sectoral requirements coordinate external inputs is low. between the initial ITAP document published in January and this document. The main reason for It is imperative that, under the leadership of the this is that the ITAP figures were produced at a national authorities, all actors work together to time when agency requirements were not develop common approaches to tackling key completely known. As well, some NGO proposals priorities for assistance and work to avoid are from potential implementing partners of UN duplication. Every effort will be made to agencies. As UN agencies have not yet completed strengthen the administration’s coordination their selection processes, however, the NGO capacity and to link this to existing structures for proposals, and their financial requirements remain coordination. These structures will need to evolve in the update. The requirements will be subject to considerably in the months ahead, to ensure they continuous updating on the database to reflect are able to address the additional challenges of receipt of funding when advised by the respective recovery and reconstruction. It is anticipated that agency. the forthcoming integrated UN mission will build upon and strengthen existing coordination Some functions for which funding is being structures at the central and field levels. requested may be incorporated into the new integrated UN mission and funds for these activities may, in the future, be covered by assessed contributions. The database will be Financial Requirements revised accordingly, to remove these proposals Figures presented in Table 1 are based on once the new UN mission structure is known. submissions received by the database maintained by AIMS by 12 February 2002: they represent funding requirements for projects which are ready for immediate implementation in 2002 and for Contingencies which there are implementing partners. They The realisation of programme outcomes is include funding requirements for both UN agencies contingent upon a number of variables including and NGOs. Over 50 NGOs have participated in the security situation, the availability of resources preparing the updated requirements. for humanitarian and reconstruction activities, as well as the continued commitment of the international community to building peace and stability in Afghanistan. These variables are 4 380 NGOs are currently registered with the Ministry of Planning. closely interlinked. While many factors will

5 impinge on the security situation, the provision of community is urged to respond generously and timely and adequate funding is a critical factor in quickly to the funding requirements presented in determining the capacity of the administration to this update. stabilise Afghanistan. To this end, the donor

6 Immediate and Transitional Assistance Programme for the Afghan People (1 October 2001- 31 December 2002)

Table 1: Agency Funding Requirements by Sector

BUDGET 5 AMOUNT REQUESTED SECTOR AGENCY REQUIREMENTS AVAILABLE FUNDS (US$) (US$) (US$) Food Assistance WFP 559,768,542 244,794,545 314,973,997 UNHCR 2,008,418 822,042 1,186,376 NGOs 32,164,534 11,546,669 20,617,865 Total 593,941,494 257,163,256 336,778,238 Food Security, Agriculture and Environment FAO 45,073,899 8,498,642 36,575,257 UNDCP 2,253,712 0 2,253,712 UNEP 1,000,386 0 1,000,386 UNHCR 5,340,000 2,348,700 2,991,300 NGOs 37,342,598 20,549,640 16,792,958 Total 91,010,595 31,396,982 59,613,613 Nutrition UNICEF 18,800,000 3,800,000 15,000,000 WHO 498,200 5,000 493,200 NGOs 3,797,482 1,311,038 2,486,444 Total 23,095,682 5,116,038 17,979,644 Health WHO 61,193,118 7,227,381 53,965,737 UNDCP 2,441,000 0 2,441,000 UNFPA 9,980,000 7,359,000 2,621,000 UNHCR 13,285,687 5,871,752 7,413,935 UNICEF 39,560,000 7,360,000 32,200,000 NGOs 55,141,464 17,467,853 37,673,611 Total 181,601,269 45,285,986 136,315,283 Water and Sanitation UNDESA 100,000 0 100,000 UNCHS/UNDP 9,000,000 0 9,000,000 UNESCO 1,770,000 0 1,770,000 UNHCR 14,080,016 6,224,057 7,855,959 UNICEF 13,300,000 3,700,000 9,600,000 WHO 3,984,658 535,500 3,449,158 NGOs 12,967,529 1,744,169 11,223,360 Total 55,202,203 12,203,726 42,998,477

5 Includes Contributions against the Donor Alert, now incorporated into the ITAP, for participating UN agencies and NGOs. Contributions to UN agencies under the Alert total US$416 million. Funding available to NGOs is US$78 million. UN carryover funding is US$106 million.

7 BUDGET AVAILABLE FUNDS AMOUNT REQUESTED SECTOR AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (US$) (US$) (US$) 6 Shelter, Housing and Urban Renewal IOM 23,202,450 15,105,359 8,097,091 UNHCR 50,865,238 21,490,605 29,374,633 UNICEF 33,000,000 18,800,000 14,200,000 UNCHS/UNDP 15,000,000 0 15,000,000 NGOs 11,548,563 241,516 11,307,047 Total 133,616,251 55,637,480 77,978,771 Protection and Promotion of Human Rights UNHCR 47,927,262 20,785,995 27,141,267 UNICEF 4,250,000 0 4,250,000 UNCO/UNOCHA 2,589,742 1,152,392 1,437,350 NGOs 1,132,965 0 1,132,965 Total 55,899,969 21,938,387 33,961,582 Gender UNESCO 450,000 0 450,000 ILO 2,460,000 0 2,460,000 UNDESA 149,946 0 149,946 UNIFEM 11,545,000 0 11,545,000 NGOs 1,178,468 31,200 1,147,268 Total 15,783,414 31,200 15,752,214 Mine Action CDAP/UNOPS 2,815,000 1,005,698 1,809,302 UNICEF 1,440,000 700,000 740,000 UNCO/UNOCHA 45,200,000 24,770,061 20,429,939 Total 49,455,000 26,475,759 22,979,241 Education UNHCR 8,171,947 3,640,486 4,531,461 UNICEF 69,610,000 25,329,000 44,281,000 UNFPA 700,000 0 700,000 UNESCO 21,040,000 0 21,040,000 NGOs 19,352,571 3,783,163 15,569,408 Total 118,874,518 32,752,649 86,121,869

6 The shelter sector includes Non-Food Items (NFIs) for IDPs who do not return home and for other vulnerable people.

8 BUDGET AVAILABLE FUNDS AMOUNT REQUESTED SECTOR AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (US$) (US$) (US$) Refugees, Returnees and Reintegration WHO 3,822,360 1,279,440 2,542,920 WFP 15,858,036 0 15,858,036 UNICEF 8,940,525 6,440,000 2,500,525 IOM 24,834,740 2,750,345 22,084,395 UNHCR 122,318,771 53,198,092 69,120,679 NGOs 59,785,854 21,878,928 37,906,926 Total 235,560,286 85,546,805 150,013,481 7 Governance UNFPA 325,000 0 325,000 UNHCR 5,049,874 2,231,266 2,818,608 UNICEF 1,750,000 0 1,750,000 UNESCO 614,500 2,500 612,000 IOM 26,779,911 1,857,143 24,922,768 UNDP 22,092,600 0 22,092,600 UNDCP 11,873,510 440,000 11,433,510 UNCHS/UNDP 19,000,000 1,000,000 18,000,000 NGOs 1,288,260 0 1,288,260 Total 88,773,655 5,530,909 83,242,746 Culture UNESCO 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Total 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Media UNESCO 4,920,000 0 4,920,000 UNIC 52,283 0 52,283 NGOs 3,000,000 25,000 2,975,000 Total 7,972,283 25,000 7,947,283 Employment ILO 5,125,340 0 5,125,340 UNFPA 1,141,999 715,000 426,999 UNDCP 8,962,000 0 8,962,000 UNHCR 2,021,000 822,045 1,198,955 NGOs 65,273 0 65,273 Total 17,315,612 1,537,045 15,778,567

7 Multisectoral projects have been included under the sector for which the largest proportion of their budget is dedicated. Where one sector is not dominant, multisectoral activities are included under governance.

9 BUDGET AVAILABLE FUNDS AMOUNT REQUESTED SECTOR AGENCY REQUIREMENTS (US$) (US$) (US$) 8 Infrastructure ILO 4,950,000 0 4,950,000 UNDP 39,380,000 3,000,000 36,380,000 UNCHS/UNDP 8,700,000 0 8,700,000 UNDESA 100,000 0 100,000 UNDCP 210,000 0 210,000 NGOs 8,604,128 675 8,603,453 Total 61,944,128 3,000,675 58,943,453 Coordination and Support Services UNCO/UNOCHA 22,979,449 12,946,315 10,033,134 (Coordination) SMU 1,000,000 570,000 430,000 UNSECOORD 1,748,000 800,000 948,000 UNOCHA (IRIN) 670,881 150,000 520,881 UNOCHA/UNDP 2,898,798 1,629,984 1,268,814 (AIMS) 9 WFP 10,053,152 0 10,053,152 NGOs 1,413,000 240,000 1,173,000 Total 40,763,280 16,336,299 24,426,981

Grand Total 1,780,809,639 599,978,196 1,180,831,443

8 Infrastructure includes around US$ 40 million of activities which include employment generation through use of labour intensive technologies. 9 World Food Programme (WFP) Special Operation “Logistics Support to Inter-Agency Relief Effort (SO10130)” for US$ 35m is fully funded (contributions are included under the Food Assistance sector). The amount requested under Coordination is for a new Special Operation, commencing in April 2002, and includes air operations, Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and the Joint Logistics Centre (JLC) costs.

10 IMMEDIATE AND TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMME FOR THE AFGHAN PEOPLE (1 OCTOBER 2001 – 31 DECEMBER 2002) TABLE 2: AGENCY FUNDING REQUESTED BY SECTOR

Shelter, Food Security, Protection and Refugees, Coordination Water and Housing and Organization Name Total Requested Food Assistance Agriculture and Nutrition Health Promotion of Gender Mine Action Education Returnees and Governance Culture Media Employment Infrastructure and Support Sanitation Urban Environment Human Rights Reintegration Services Renewal

CDAP/UNOPS 1,809,302 1,809,302

FAO 36,575,257 36,575,257

ILO 12,535,340 2,460,000 5,125,340 4,950,000

IOM 55,104,254 8,097,091 22,084,395 24,922,768

SMU 430,000 430,000

UNCHS/UNDP 50,700,000 9,000,000 15,000,000 18,000,000 8,700,000

UNCO/UNOCHA 31,900,423 1,437,350 20,429,939 10,033,134

UNDCP 25,300,222 2,253,712 2,441,000 11,433,510 8,962,000 210,000

UNDESA 349,946 100,000 149,946 100,000

UNDP 58,472,600 22,092,600 36,380,000

UNEP 1,000,386 1,000,386

UNESCO 38,792,000 1,770,000 450,000 21,040,000 612,000 10,000,000 4,920,000

UNFPA 4,072,999 2,621,000 700,000 325,000 426,999

UNHCR* 153,633,173 1,186,376 2,991,300 7,413,935 7,855,959 29,374,633 27,141,267 4,531,461 69,120,679 2,818,608 1,198,955

UNIC 52,283 52,283

UNICEF 124,521,525 15,000,000 32,200,000 9,600,000 14,200,000 4,250,000 740,000 44,281,000 2,500,525 1,750,000

UNIFEM 11,545,000 11,545,000

UNOCHA (IRIN) 520,881 520,881

UNOCHA/UNDP 1,268,814 1,268,814

UNSECOORD 948,000 948,000

WFP** 340,885,185 314,973,997 15,858,036 10,053,152

WHO 60,451,015 493,200 53,965,737 3,449,158 2,542,920

Total UN 1,010,868,605 316,160,373 42,820,655 15,493,200 98,641,672 31,775,117 66,671,724 32,828,617 14,604,946 22,979,241 70,552,461 112,106,555 81,954,486 10,000,000 4,972,283 15,713,294 50,340,000 23,253,981

Total NGOs 169,962,838 20,617,865 16,792,958 2,486,444 37,673,611 11,223,360 11,307,047 1,132,965 1,147,268 15,569,408 37,906,926 1,288,260 2,975,000 65,273 8,603,453 1,173,000

Total 1,180,831,443 336,778,238 59,613,613 17,979,644 136,315,283 42,998,477 77,978,771 33,961,582 15,752,214 22,979,241 86,121,869 150,013,481 83,242,746 10,000,000 7,947,283 15,778,567 58,943,453 24,426,981

* For detailed sectoral and geographic breakdown of overall UNHCR budget, see Annex 1. ** For sectoral breakdown of funding requested by WFP , see Annex 2.

11 Immediate and Transitional Assistance Programme for the Afghan People (1 October 2001 – 31 December 2002) 10 Table 3: Summary of Major Donor Contributions to Donor Alert (carry over not included) 15 February 2002

Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by the respective appealing organisation

Donor Value US$ % of Total Response

United States 116,641,469 28.05

Japan 71,750,901 17.26

United Kingdom 45,235,841 10.88

Italy 24,839,985 5.97

European Commission 24,155,150 5.81

Germany 22,689,039 5.46

Netherlands 20,409,896 4.91

Norway 13,108,850 3.15

Sweden 10,958,891 2.64

Denmark 9,418,172 2.27

Australia 7,532,307 1.81

Luxembourg 5,365,009 1.29

Canada 3,681,196 0.89

Belgium 3,408,760 0.82

Others 17,153,906 4.13

Private/NGO/Intl 19,450,132 4.68

Grand Total 415,799,504

Table 3: Summary of Major Donor Contributions to Donor Alert

10 Contributions made to the Donor Alert (1 October 2001-30 March 2002), now incorporated in the ITAP.

12 Immediate and Transitional Assistance Programme for the Afghan People (1 October 2001 – 31 December 2002)

Table 4: List of Participating NGOs by Sector

BY SECTOR ACRONYM NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION Food Assistance ADA Afghan Development Association MEDAIR Medical Environmental Development with Air Assistance SC-USA Save the Children – USA VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan WVI World Vision International Food Security, Agriculture & ACF Action Contre la Faim Environment ACU/START Afghan Consultancy Unit/Short Term Assistance for Rehabilitation-Team ADA Afghan Development Association AHSAO Afghans Health & Social Assistance Organisation ASO Afghanistan Solidarity Organisation CA Christian Aid CONCERN Concern DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees NAC Norwegian Afghanistan Committee RDO Rehabilitation and Development Organisation SCA Swedish Committee for Afghanistan SC-USA Save the Children – US VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan WRO World Relief Organisation Nutrition ACF Action Contre la Faim AMI Aide Médicale Internationale IBN-SINA Ibnsina Public Health Programme for Afghanistan SC-UK Save the Children – UK SC-USA Save the Children – USA Health ACF Action Contre la Faim ACU/START Afghan Consultancy Unit/Short Term Assistance for Rehabilitation-Team AHDS Afghan Health & Development Services AITM Afghan Inkishafee Tarbiawee Markaz AMI Aide Médicale Internationale HNI Healthnet International IAM International Assistance Mission IBN-SINA Ibnsina Public Health Programme for Afghanistan IMC International Medical Corps ISRA Islamic Relief Agency MEDAIR Medical Environmental Development with Air Assistance MRCA Medical Refresher Course for Afghans NAC Norwegian Afghan Committee NCA Norwegian Church Aid RI Relief International SCA Swedish Committee for Afghanistan SC-USA Save the Children – USA WPF World Population Fund

13 BY SECTOR ACRONYM NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION Water & Sanitation ACF Action Contre la Faim AHDS Afghan Health & Development Services AKDN Aga Khan Development Network AMRAN Afghan Mobile Reconstruction Association ASO Afghanistan Solidarity Organisation CCA Cooperation Centre for Afghanistan DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees NAC Norwegian Afghanistan Committee SADA Southern Afghanistan Development Association VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan Shelter, Housing & Urban DACAAR Danish Committee for Aid to Afghan Refugees Renewal SFL Shelter for Life Tearfund ZOA ZOA Refugee Care Protection & Promotion of APAMR Afghan Professional Alliance for Minority Rights Human Rights CCA Cooperation Centre for Afghanistan CHA Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance CPAU Cooperation of Peace & Unity IHRA Institute of Human Rights for Afghanistan VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan Gender AMRAN Afghan Mobile Reconstruction Association RI Relief International SC-USA Save the Children – USA Mine Action AMRAN Afghan Mobile Reconstruction Association CDAP/UNOPS Comprehensive Afghan Disabled Programme / United Nations Operations SC-US Save the Children – USA Education AHSAO Afghans Health & Social Assistance Organisation AIA Afghan Institute of Accounting AITM Afghan Inkishafee Tarbiawee Markaz ASO Afghanistan Solidarity Organisation BBC/AEP British Broadcasting Corp./Afgan Education Programme CARE Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere CCA Cooperation Centre for Afghanistan ERIC Education Resource & Information Centre GRSP Ghazni Rural Support Programme NAC Norwegian Afghanistan Committee PINF People in Need Foundation RI Relief International SCA Swedish Committee for Afghanistan SC-USA Save the Children – USA VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan Refugees, Returnees & ACU/START Afghan Consultancy Unit/Short Term Assistance for Rehabilitation-Team Reintegration ADA Afghan Development Association CCA Cooperation Centre for Afghanistan CCF Christian Children’s Fund HNI Healthnet International ICMC International Catholic Migration Committee IMC International Medical Corps IRC International Rescue Committee MEDAIR Medical Environmental Development with Air Assistance NRC Norwegian Refugee Council PINF People in Need in Foundation SC-USA Save the Children – USA Tearfund

14 BY SECTOR ACRONYM NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION Governance NAC Norwegian Afghanistan Committee NERU National Emergency & Reconstruction Unit QDCCU Qandahar Drug Control & Coordination Unit Media & Culture AINA Afghan International News Association - United Nations Afghanistan Magazine Employment AHSAO Afghans Health & Social Assistance Organisation RDO Relief and Development Organisation Infrastructure AHSAO Afghans Health & Social Assistance Organisation AKDN Aga Khan Development Network ALO Afghan Literacy Organisation AMRAN Afghan Mobile Reconstruction Association NAC Norwegian Afghanistan Committee OHA Organisation for Humanitarian Assistance VARA Voluntary Association for the Rehabilitation of Afghanistan Coordination & Support ACBAR Agency Coordinating Body for Afghan Relief Services ANCB Afghan NGOs’ Coordination Bureau

15 ANNEX 1

16 ANNEX 2

WFP: Sectoral Breakdown of Funding Requested

Amount requested % In US$

Food Assistance (Relief) 158,926,567 46.6

Food Security, Agriculture and Environment 25,177,621 7.4

Nutrition 13,891,272 4.1

Education 48,874,056 14.3

Refugees and Returnees Assistance* 20,638,596 6.1

Income Generation and Employment 63,323,920 18.6

Coordination and Support Services 10,053,152 2.9

Total 340,885,185 100.0

* Includes US$ 15.8 million for refugee operations in Pakistan and Iran, and US$ 4.8 million for IDP returnees in Afghanistan

17 ANNEX 3

User Guide to the Activity Tracking Information Management System, AIMS

The individual proposals comprising the ITAP are held in a database by the Afghanistan Information Management Service (AIMS). They are available for everybody to view on the AIMS website at www.hic.org.pk.

To access the Database, simply follow these steps:

1. Open your Internet browser (usually Internet Explorer or Netscape Navigator) and type www.hic.org.pk into the address bar. 2. On the left hand side of the screen is a menu bar. Click on the button that reads “Programme 2002”. 3. You will now be in the Appeals Section. Click on the button that reads “Access the Database”. 4. You will now be in the Database for the 2002 Appeal, including clear instructions on how to use the database.

18 19 For further information and additional copies, please contact

Office of the United Nations Coordinator for Afghanistan

Alexander Costy: [email protected] [email protected]

Islamabad: Tel: (92 51) 2211451 Fax: (92 51) 2211450

Kabul: Tel: (92 51) 2214522 Fax: (92 51) 2214379

Afghanistan Information Management Service (AIMS) www.hic.org.pk

UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs

New York Office
Geneva Office United Nations Palais des Nations New York, N.Y. 10017 1211 Geneva 10 USA SWITZERLAND Fax: (1 212) 963.3630 Tel: (41 22) 917.1972 Fax: (41 22) 917.0368 [email protected]

UN Development Group Office

[email protected] [email protected] Fax: (1 212) 906.3609

This document can also be found on: http://www.reliefweb.int/

20 21