ARTICLE
Co-Production of Acetone and Ethanol With Molar Ratio Control Enables Production of Improved Gasoline or Jet Fuel Blends
Zachary C. Baer,1,2 Sebastian Bormann,1 Sanil Sreekumar,1,3 Adam Grippo,1 F. Dean Toste,1,3,4 Harvey W. Blanch,1,2 Douglas S. Clark1,2 1 Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California 2 Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; telephone: þ1 510-642-1387; fax: 510-642-4778; e-mail: [email protected]; telephone: þ1 510-642-2408; fax: þ1 510-643-1228; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 4 Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720; telephone: þ1 510-642-2850; fax: þ1 510-666-2504; e-mail: [email protected]
chemical catalysis was used to upgrade the co-produced ethanol ABSTRACT: The fermentation of simple sugars to ethanol has and acetone at both low and high molar ratios to higher-chain been the most successful biofuel process to displace fossil fuel oxygenates for gasoline and jet fuel applications. consumption worldwide thus far. However, the physical properties Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 2079–2087. of ethanol and automotive components limit its application in most ß 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. – cases to 10 15 vol% blends with conventional gasoline. Fermenta- KEYWORDS: metabolic engineering; fermentation; biofuels; tive co-production of ethanol and acetone coupled with a catalytic catalytic alkylation alkylation reaction could enable the production of gasoline blendstocks enriched in higher-chain oxygenates. Here we demonstrate a synthetic pathway for the production of acetone through the mevalonate precursor hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA. Expression of this pathway in various strains of Escherichia coli Introduction resulted in the co-production of acetone and ethanol. Metabolic engineering and control of the environmental conditions for The increasing demand for petroleum-based fuels, coupled with the microbial growth resulted in controllable acetone and ethanol deleterious effects of increasing carbon dioxide emissions, has production with ethanol:acetone molar ratios ranging from 0.7:1 to 10.0:1. Specifically, use of gluconic acid as a substrate increased driven efforts to develop approaches for the production of production of acetone and balanced the redox state of the system, transportation fuels from renewable resources. The fermentation predictively reducing the molar ethanol:acetone ratio. Increases in of sugars to ethanol by yeast or bacteria has been exploited by ethanol production and the molar ethanol:acetone ratio were society for thousands of years (Cavalieri et al., 2003). Currently, a achieved by co-expression of the aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase significant proportion of the ethanol produced through this (AdhE) from E. coli MG1655 and by co-expression of pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc) and alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhB) from fermentative process is blended with gasoline as an anti-knock, Z. mobilis. Controlling the fermentation aeration rate and pH in a octane-enhancing additive. However, ethanol production for fuel bioreactor raised the acetone titer to 5.1 g L 1, similar to that use in 2010 was 23.0 billion gallons, accounting for only 6.8% of the obtained with wild-type Clostridium acetobutylicum. Optimizing world’s gasoline consumption (EIA data). The United States leads the metabolic pathway, the selection of host strain, and the all nations in ethanol production at 13.3 billion gallons per year but physiological conditions employed for host growth together fi improved acetone titers over 35-fold (0.14–5.1 g/L). Finally, has seen signi cant resistance recently to increase production above the 10 vol% blend-wall (Strogen et al., 2012). The production of longer-chain biofuels (Atsumi et al., 2009; Jang et al., 2012; Correspondence to: F.D. Toste, H.W. Blanch, and D.S. Clark Machado et al., 2012) can address the blend-wall problem. However, Contract grant sponsor: Energy Biosciences Institute Contract grant sponsor: DAAD several of these longer-chain biofuel molecules are highly toxic to Received 20 December 2015; Accepted 7 March 2016 the producing organism, severely limiting the final titers achieved Accepted manuscript online 14 March 2016; during fermentation (Lehmann and L€utke-Eversloh, 2011). Article first published online 31 March 2016 in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bit.25978/abstract). Acetone, also known as dimethyl ketone, is a colorless liquid DOI 10.1002/bit.25978 used primarily as a solvent in the synthesis of polymers. Acetone is
ß 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 113, No. 10, October, 2016 2079 not well-suited as a fuel molecule because of its high volatility and Figure 1 (Scenario 1) describes how a high ethanol:acetone ratio polymer swelling susceptibility but is only mildly toxic to most (in excess of 5:1) would produce an improved gasoline blendstock 1 organisms, with tolerances in excess of 60 g L reported (Jones enriched in C5 and C7 oxygenates. Alternatively, controlling the and Woods, 1986). The a-carbons on acetone can be rendered ethanol:acetone ratio to a level of 3:1 or below, as depicted in nucleophilic and were previously shown to form carbon-carbon Scenario 2 of Figure 1, enables nearly complete conversions of both bonds with primary alcohols via an alkylation reaction under fermentation products to mono-ketones of C5–C7.. Balakrishnan et al. basic conditions with an appropriate transition-metal catalyst (2015) and Sacia et al. (2015) recently demonstrated that the mono- (Anbarasan et al., 2012). Therefore, the co-production of acetone ketones produced from this initial alkylation reaction could be and ethanol, combined with a chemical catalysis alkylation upgraded further to a highly branched C10 and C14 or to cyclic C15 reaction, enables the production of C5 and C7 mono-ketones as mono-ketones via self-condensation reactions to dimers and trimers precursors for gasoline blendstocks. Bormann et al. (2014) (Fig. 1, Scenario 2). The high degree of branching and longer-chain demonstrated that tuning the ratio of fermentation products for length of these C10–C15 products makes them well suited as jet fuel. catalytic upgrade has a major impact on the distribution of long- Biological production of acetone was demonstrated on the chain fuel precursors. industrial scale with Clostridium acetobutylicum from the 1920s to
Figure 1. Summary of proposed metabolic pathway for co-production of acetone and ethanol in E. coli (dashed lines indicate recombinant pathways, solid lines native pathways) coupled with proposed chemical catalysis to enriched gasoline or jet blendstocks. Acetone and ethanol from the fermentation can be upgraded to either an enriched gasoline blendstock with an ethanol:acetone ratio of at least 5:1 (Scenario 1) or highly branched jet fuel blendstock using an ethanol:acetone ratio of at most 3:1 (Scenario 2).
2080 Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Vol. 113, No. 10, October, 2016 1950s (Tracy et al., 2012). The metabolic pathway for producing suitable candidates are combined with a second inducible operon acetone in C. acetobutylicum was successfully transferred to containing either the E. coli MG1655 alcohol/aldehyde dehydro- Escherichia coli (Bermejo et al., 1998) and resulted in titers ganse (AdhE) or both the Z. mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc) comparable to those of wild-type C. acetobutylicum. The pathway and alcohol dehydrogense (AdhB) to improve the co-production of for acetone production in C. acetobutylicum requires the presence of ethanol. Optimization of the fermentation conditions and sugar acetate or butyrate in their un-dissociated forms. A CoA-transferase substrate affords significant improvements in overall solvent (CtfA or CtfB) transfers a Co-A moiety from acetoacetyl-CoA to production and control of the ethanol:acetone ratio. This control the un-dissociated acid, producing acetyl- or butyryl-CoA and over the solvent ratio enables catalytic upgrading to either gasoline acetoacetate. Wiesenborn et al. (1989) reported very high acetate or jet fuel blendstocks. and butyrate Km values of 1,000 and 660 mM, respectively, for the fi puri ed C. acetobutylicum Co-A-transferase. Acetoacetate is then Material and Methods decarboxylated to acetone by acetoacetate decarboxylase (Adc). May et al. (2013) described a modified acetone production pathway Chemicals, Microorganisms, and Plasmids using a thioesterase from Haemophilus influenzae (ybgC) that did not require acetate or butyrate reassimilation and increased the All chemicals and reagents were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. acetone titer to 7.1 g L 1. However, the thioesterase activity toward Louis, MO) and Spectrum Chemicals. Enzymes were purchased acetyl-CoA, coupled with the aerobic environment of the from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA) and used according to the fermentation, limited ethanol production to at most 10 mM or manufacturer’s instructions. Strains used in this work and their 0.5 g/L. This low ethanol:acetone ratio is incompatible with the sources are described in Table I. Primers used and plasmids created chemical catalysis upgrading, which requires a minimum molar in this work are described in Supplemental Table SI and Table II, ratio of 1:1 for complete conversion of the acetone. To address this respectively. challenge, we identified an alternative acetone production pathway not requiring acid reassimilation that allowed for sufficient Strain Maintenance ethanol co-production by expressing a hydroxymethylglutaryl- CoA (HMG-CoA) synthase and HMG-CoA lyase in E. coli,as All E. coli strains were first streaked onto Luria Broth (LB) agar depicted in Figure 1. plates supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic (60 mgmL 1 HMG-CoA synthases are responsible for mevalonate production kanamycin and/or 100 mgmL 1 carbenicillin) if necessary. Single and have been investigated extensively for the microbial synthesis of colonies were picked and inoculated into liquid LB media overnight isoprenoids (Peralta-Yahya et al., 2011; Ro et al., 2006; Tsuruta at 37 C before sub-culturing into fresh liquid LB media. Strains et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2011), whereas HMG-CoA lyases found in were stored in 15 wt% glycerol at 80 C. higher eukaryotes are responsible for the final enzymatic step of ketoneogenesis and leucine catabolism in the liver. Isolates from Assembly of Expression Plasmids prokaryotes are implicated in mevalonate catabolism and maintain activity under oxidative conditions by lacking residue Cys323 (Pi e All plasmid used in this study were constructed using isothermal et al., 2007). The metabolism of glucose to acetone in most DNA assembly as previously described (Gibson et al., 2009). The microorganisms is not balanced with respect to reducing genes C. acetobutylicum thl, adc, and E. coli strain MG1655 adhe equivalents; therefore, fermentations occur under aerobic con- were amplified from genomic DNA. Pyruvate decarboxylase (pdc) ditions. For this reason, this study only considered HMG-CoA lyase and alcohol dehydrogenase (adhB)fromZ. mobilis were amplified isolates from previously described prokaryotes. from the pLOI297 vector. HMG-CoA synthase and lyase genes from In this work, we describe the use of an alternative acid- E. faecalis EF1363, S. aureous mvaS, L. acidophilis LAC30SC_03150, independent acetone production pathway expressed in E. coli using P.mevalonii mvaB, and B. subtilis yngG were synthesized with codon both an HMG-CoA synthase and an HMG-CoA lyase in a single optimization for both E. coli and C. acetobutylicum through geneArt inducible-operon with the C. acetobutylicum genes thl and adc. (see sequences in Supplementary Materials). The HMG-CoA lyase Several sources of the synthase and lyase enzymes are tested, and gene from A. baumannii AB57_1597 was also synthesized by
Table I. Strains used in this study.
Strain Description Source
E. coli BL21 (DE3) F ompT hsdSB(rB mB ) gal dcm (lDE3) Invitrogen E. coli MG1655 (DE3) K-12;l ;F (lDE3) Trinh et al. (2011) E. coli XL1B F0 proAB lacIqZDM15 Tn10 (Tetr) Stratagene K-12; l ;F lacIq rrnBT14 DlacZWJ16 E. coli BW25113 hsdR514 DaraBADAH33 DrhaBADLD78 Trinh et al. (2011) E. coli BFA7 (DE3) BW25113, lDE3 Dzwf Dmdh DfrdA Dndh Trinh et al. (2011) Dpta DpoxB DldhA::Kan E. coli ATCC 11303 Harboring pLOI297 ATCC C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824 Wild-type ATCC
Baer et al.: Ratio-Controlled Acetone-Ethanol Production 2081
Biotechnology and Bioengineering Table II. Plasmids used in this study.
Name Description Source pET 21b f1 ori, Ampr Novagen pET 24b f1 ori, Kanr Novagen p7EFPM pET21b, pT7 E. faecalis HMG-CoA SYN þ P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7LAPM pET21b, pT7 L. acidophilus HMG-CoA SYN þ P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7SAPM pET21b, pT7 S. aureus HMG-CoA SYN þ P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7EFAB pET21b, pT7 E. faecalis HMG-CoA SYN þ A. baumanii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7LAAB pET21b, pT7 L. acidophilus HMG-CoA SYN þ A. baumanii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7SABS pET21b, pT7 S. aureus HMG-CoA SYN þ B. subtilis HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study pK7AT pET24b, pT7 E. coli strain MG1655 ADHE þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7negSYN pET21b, pT7 P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7negLYS pET21b, pT7 E. faecalis HMG-CoA SYN þ C. acetobutylicum ADC þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7negADC pET21b, pT7 E. faecalis HMG-CoA SYN þ P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum THL tT7 This study p7negTHL pET21b, pT7 E. faecalis HMG-CoA SYN þ P. mevalonii HMG-CoA LYS þ C. acetobutylicum ADC tT7 This study pK7PA pET24b, pT7 Z. mobilis PDC þ Z. mobilis ADHB tT7 This study