Catalytic Dehyration of Ethanol to Ethylene Abstract Introduction 61

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catalytic Dehyration of Ethanol to Ethylene Abstract Introduction 61 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining DGMK Conference October 4-6, 2011, Dresden, Germany Catalytic Dehyration of Ethanol to Ethylene Ying Zhu, Zhaosheng Jin, Wei Shen SINOPEC Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology, Shanghai 201208, People´s Republic of China Abstract The different routes of ethylene production were briefly introduced and the advantage of ethanol to ethylene (ETE) route was explained. Followed by that, the upgraded catalyst applied in this route developed by SINOPEC Shanghai Research Institute of Petrochemical Technology (SRIPT) was introduced together with the development of the ethanol to ethylene process. The core technologies involved in this process development were discussed, such as isothermal fixed-bed reactor, water scrubber and alkaline wash column, two columns of low-temperature separation as well as process heat integration. Furthermore, the performance of one of ethanol industrial plants licensed by SRIPT was reviewed. It is as follows, conversion of ethanol reaches 99% while selectivity of ethylene is over 96% at the reaction temperature of 350~450°C, the liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV)of 0.5~1.0 h-1 and atmosphere pressure. Meanwhile, the catalyst shows its life time of one year. This route is considered not only as an economical and practical process but also as an environment- friendly path to ethylene production. Introduction Ethylene is considered as one of the most important chemicals in petrochemical industry, such as ethylene, ethylene oxide, ethylene glycol, polyvinyl chloride, styrene, vinyl acetate etc. The production rate of ethylene nationwide is the indication of development level in the chemical industry. Therefore, ethylene production always draws the most attention. The different routes of ethylene production co-existed in industry in the different period of time. As a traditional ethylene production process, ethanol dehydration was widely used in Brazil, India, Pakistan, and Peru in 1980s. However, this route was phased out in the past two decades. Ethylene is mainly derived from hydrocarbon steam cracking of naphtha and natural gas feedstock due to its more competitive investment and operating cost at that time. With the depletion of crude oil and continuing increase in crude oil price, ethanol dehydration process is back to people’s sight due to its great advantage compared to hydrocarbon stream cracking of petroleum process. With the great breakthrough of biomass-to-ethanol technology, the raw material price of ethanol declined to a large extend, which makes the ethanol dehydration process is more feasible. Ethanol dehydration process has more flexible in terms of ethanol feedstock not only with different concentration but also various biomasses. Furthermore, this process operates at mild reaction conditions, normally 250~480°C and 0.01~1.8MPaG while the steam cracking of naphtha occurs at 800~850°C and 0.18MPaG. Compared to the number of equipments required by steam cracking process, ethanol dehydration process requires far less and around 80 equipments. Therefore, the construction cost of ethanol dehydration plant is much lower than that of steam cracking process due to the low standard construction material and less equipment required. In addition, ethanol dehydration process has high ethylene selectivity which leads to the more purified product and this directly reduces the separation cost. Therefore, ethanol dehydration process is DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2, ISBN 978-3-941721-17-3 61 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining much simpler and easier to be controlled than the steam cracking process. In literature, it is found that, for ethanol dehydration process, the energy consumed for each tonne of ethylene produced is much less than the energy consumption for a common steam cracking process. Again, the low capital investment, simple process, short construction period leads to the quick investment return and make the dehydration of ethanol to ethylene process even more attractive. Most importantly, the ethanol dehydration process has limited impact on the environment due to its high selectivity of ethylene. This process is considered as an environment-friendly one. The reactor types in the ETE process route are common: one is fixed-bed and the other is fluidised-bed. The process with fluidised-bed reactor was first brought up by ABB in late 1970s; however, no industry application is launched yet. Whereas the process with fixed-bed reactor is more common nowadays, either adiabatic or isothermal process. The ethanol dehydration reaction in the early stage takes place in the tubular fixed-bed reactor at atmosphere pressure where the heat for reaction is supplied directly or indirectly by heating medium. In this case, the reaction temperature and flow rate are key factors which affect the product composition. Too high temperature or too low flow rate of ethanol leads to the formation of by-products. On the other side, the conversion rate decreases with the increase of the ethanol flow rate. To solve this issue, isothermal process of ethanol dehydration is suggested that ethanol feed is heated to desired reaction temperature to ensure the reaction occurs. Based on this, three adiabatic fixed-bed reactors connected in series and the process with this reactor arrangement is industrialised in the 1980s with the capacity of 60 kilo-tonnes per year. The furnace is applied to heat up the feed mixture of ethanol and steam in each section of reactor and unconverted ethanol and by-products circulate. The steam prevents the reaction from coking. At mean time, it improves the catalyst activity enhance production rate. Halcon/SD developed its isothermal fixed-bed reactor technology and industrialised soon in the 1970s. Soon after, Halcon/SD developed the multi-sections of adiabatic fixed-bed reactor. Lummus also had its fixed-bed reactor process and industrialised in the 1960s. It applied the tubular isothermal reactor in the process and utilised hot-oil as the heating media to supply the reaction heat. By combining these characterise, SRIPT developed its own technology on the ethanol dehydration to ethylene process. To understand its process, the mechanism of ETE process is reviewed at first. The Mechanism of ETE Process Under certain reaction temperature and pressure, the ethanol is catalytically converted to ethylene and water. It is an endothermic and molecules increasing reaction. (a) Main Reaction The main reaction of ethanol to ethylene is illustrated as follows: Catalyst C2H5OH ⎯⎯→⎯ C2H 4 + H 2O +10.82kcal/mol Equation 1 (b) Side Reactions The primary side reactions in the ETE process are: The intermolecular dehydration of ethanol leads to ethers formation, the dehydrogenation of ethanol results in the formation of acetaldehyde and hydrogen, and the ethylene oligomerization and cracking produce methane, ethane, C3’s and C4’s, and so on. The main factors which affect the dehydration reaction are the reaction temperature, LHSV, and reaction pressure. Besides, the catalyst performance and impurities contained in the ethanol feed will also affect the reaction to some extent. DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2 62 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining SRIPT’S ETE Process In Figure 1, it can be seen that the ETE process developed by SRIPT includes three sections, reaction and water scrubbing, compressing and drying as well as ethylene purification. Figure 1 Schematic Draw of ETE Process The ethanol feed is vaporized and preheated with the reactor effluent before it is charged into the reactor. In the reactor the ethanol is catalytically converted to ethylene and water. After heat-exchanging with feed, the reactor effluent enters the bottom of water scrubber, and directly contacts the spraying water from the top part, and gets further cooling. The water and other high boiling point components in the reactor effluent are condensed and discharged as process waste. The gas-phase stream from the top of the water scrubber enters the bottom of alkaline washing column. This column is divided into two parts: the lower one is alkaline washing part, in which diluted alkaline solution is sprayed and recycled to remove the acidic gas such as carbon dioxide; and the upper one is water washing part, directly scrubbing with spraying water. The crude ethylene stream from the alkaline washing column is compressed, and cooled down, then enters ethylene dryer to remove the water contained. The stream from ethylene dryer enters the ethylene column to remove ethane, C3 and other heavier components. The stream from the top of ethylene column enters the stripper to remove light ends such as hydrogen, methane and carbon monoxide. The ethylene product from the bottom of the stripper is sent to storage tank. JT-II Catalyst Specification A number of catalysts are used in the ETE reaction; the results show that the activated alumina and silica-alumina are the most effective ones. The specification of the activated alumina catalyst JT-II developed by SRIPT is shown below. Table 1 JT-II catalyst specifications Items Specifications Appearance White (or reddish) cylinder Main component Alumina Physical size Ф3.5~4.0×10~20mm Bulk density 0.60~0.80 g/ml Crush strength ≥ 80 N/cm DGMK-Tagungsbericht 2011-2 63 Catalysis – Innovative Applications in Petrochemistry and Refining JT-II is a very stable catalyst with high yield in ethanol dehydration. The conversion rate of ethanol reaches 99% while selectivity of ethylene is over 96% at the reaction temperature of 350~450°C, LHSV of 0.5~1.0 h-1 and atmosphere pressure. Meanwhile, the catalyst shows its life time of one year. Commercial References SRIPT started its research on ethanol to ethylene process in 1982. Based on the JT-II catalyst, SRIPT has developed the process design package of ethanol dehydration to ethylene, and it was commercialized soon after. In 1988, this technique was first applied on the ethylene industrial plant in China. This process was upgraded based on actual plant data and improved catalyst for ethylene production.
Recommended publications
  • Use of Solvents for Pahs Extraction and Enhancement of the Pahs Bioremediation in Coal- Tar-Contaminated Soils Pak-Hing Lee Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2000 Use of solvents for PAHs extraction and enhancement of the PAHs bioremediation in coal- tar-contaminated soils Pak-Hing Lee Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Environmental Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Pak-Hing, "Use of solvents for PAHs extraction and enhancement of the PAHs bioremediation in coal-tar-contaminated soils " (2000). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 13912. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/13912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter fece, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quaiity of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substeindard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlilcely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Safer Cocktail for an Ethanol/Water/Ammonia Solvent
    L A S C P LSC in Practice C P O C L Safer Cocktail for an Ethanol/Water/ K T I A I C Ammonia Solvent Mixture L S A Problem T A laboratory had been under pressure to move towards Using this mixture, the sample uptake capacity of I the newer generation of safer liquid scintillation ULTIMA-Flo AP, ULTIMA-Flo M and ULTIMA Gold O cocktails. Unfortunately, the sample composition of LLT (PerkinElmer 6013599, 6013579 and 6013377, one of their targets kept giving the researchers problems. respectively) at 20 °C was determined and N Before the lead researcher contacted PerkinElmer, the results were: they had tried PerkinElmer’s Opti-Fluor®, ULTIMA ULTIMA-Flo AP 4.00 mL in 10 mL cocktail N Gold LLT, and ULTIMA Gold XR. All of the safer O ™ ULTIMA-Flo M 4.25 mL in 10 mL cocktail cocktails could incorporate each of the constituents T as indicated by their sample capacity graphs. ULTIMA Gold LLT 4.25 mL in 10 mL cocktail E The problematic sample was an extraction solvent From these results, we observed that it was possible consisting of 900 mL ethanol, 50 mL ammonium to get 4.0 mL of the sample into all of these cocktails. hydroxide, 500 mL water and an enzyme containing In addition, we determined that it was not possible to 14C. The mixture had a pH in the range of 10 to 11. get 4 mL sample into 7 mL of any of these cocktails. To complete this work, we also checked for lumines- Discussion cence using 4 mL of sample in 10 mL of each cocktail.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethylene Dichloride (Edc) Handbook
    ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE (EDC) HANDBOOK OXYCHEM TECHNICAL INFORMATION 11/2014 Dallas-based Occidental Chemical Corporation is a leading North American manufacturer of basic chemicals, vinyls and performance chemicals directly and through various affiliates (collectively, OxyChem). OxyChem is also North America's largest producer of sodium chlorite. As a Responsible Care® company, OxyChem's global commitment to safety and the environment goes well beyond compliance. OxyChem's Health, Environment and Safety philosophy is a positive motivational force for our employees, and helps create a strong culture for protecting human health and the environment. Our risk management programs and methods have been, and continue to be, recognized as some of the industry's best. OxyChem offers an effective combination of industry expertise, experience, on line business tools, quality products and exceptional customer service. As a member of the Occidental Petroleum Corporation family, OxyChem represents a rich history of experience, top-notch business acumen, and sound, ethical business practices. 1 Table of Contents Page Introduction to Ethylene Dichloride ............................................................................................................ 3 Manufacturing .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Ethylene Dichloride (EDC) — Uses ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Properties Comparison
    Alternative Fuels Data Center Fuel Properties Comparison Compressed Liquefied Low Sulfur Gasoline/E10 Biodiesel Propane (LPG) Natural Gas Natural Gas Ethanol/E100 Methanol Hydrogen Electricity Diesel (CNG) (LNG) Chemical C4 to C12 and C8 to C25 Methyl esters of C3H8 (majority) CH4 (majority), CH4 same as CNG CH3CH2OH CH3OH H2 N/A Structure [1] Ethanol ≤ to C12 to C22 fatty acids and C4H10 C2H6 and inert with inert gasses 10% (minority) gases <0.5% (a) Fuel Material Crude Oil Crude Oil Fats and oils from A by-product of Underground Underground Corn, grains, or Natural gas, coal, Natural gas, Natural gas, coal, (feedstocks) sources such as petroleum reserves and reserves and agricultural waste or woody biomass methanol, and nuclear, wind, soybeans, waste refining or renewable renewable (cellulose) electrolysis of hydro, solar, and cooking oil, animal natural gas biogas biogas water small percentages fats, and rapeseed processing of geothermal and biomass Gasoline or 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 1.12 B100 1 gal = 0.74 GGE 1 lb. = 0.18 GGE 1 lb. = 0.19 GGE 1 gal = 0.67 GGE 1 gal = 0.50 GGE 1 lb. = 0.45 1 kWh = 0.030 Diesel Gallon GGE GGE 1 gal = 1.05 GGE 1 gal = 0.66 DGE 1 lb. = 0.16 DGE 1 lb. = 0.17 DGE 1 gal = 0.59 DGE 1 gal = 0.45 DGE GGE GGE Equivalent 1 gal = 0.88 1 gal = 1.00 1 gal = 0.93 DGE 1 lb. = 0.40 1 kWh = 0.027 (GGE or DGE) DGE DGE B20 DGE DGE 1 gal = 1.11 GGE 1 kg = 1 GGE 1 gal = 0.99 DGE 1 kg = 0.9 DGE Energy 1 gallon of 1 gallon of 1 gallon of B100 1 gallon of 5.66 lb., or 5.37 lb.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquichek Ethanol/Ammonia Control SERUM CHEMISTRY CONTROLS Liquichek Ethanol/Ammonia Control
    Bio-Rad Laboratories SERUM CHEMISTRY CONTROLS Liquichek Ethanol/Ammonia Control SERUM CHEMISTRY CONTROLS Liquichek Ethanol/Ammonia Control A liquid control used to monitor the precision of Ethanol and Ammonia test procedures in the clinical laboratory. • Liquid • Normal, elevated and toxic concentrations of Ammonia • 2 year shelf life at 2–8°C • 20 day open-vial stability at 2–8°C Analytes Ammonia Ethanol Refer to the package insert of currently available lots for specific analyte and stability claims Ordering Information Cat # Description 544 Level 1 ..................................................................................... 6 x 3 mL 545 Level 2 ..................................................................................... 6 x 3 mL 546 Level 3 ..................................................................................... 6 x 3 mL 545X Trilevel MiniPak (1 of each level) .................................................................. 3 x 3 mL EQAS Independent QC Unity An independent, external assessment of laboratory Ongoing, proactive, unbiased daily QC that QC Data Management tools that help you create performance in comparison to your peers. helps identify errors as they occur or begin to trend. a strategy to reduce risk and streamline QC workflow. QCNet.com/eqas QCNet.com/independentqc QCNet.com/datamanagement Bio-Rad For further information, please contact the Bio-Rad office nearest you Laboratories, Inc. or visit our website at www.bio-rad.com/qualitycontrol Clinical Website www.bio-rad.com/diagnostics Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Cellulosic Ethanol Production Via Aqueous Ammonia Soaking Pretreatment and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation Asli Isci Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Cellulosic ethanol production via aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation Asli Isci Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Bioresource and Agricultural Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Isci, Asli, "Cellulosic ethanol production via aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15695. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15695 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cellulosic ethanol production via aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation by Asli Isci A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Co-majors: Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering; Biorenewable Resources and Technology Program of Study Committee: Robert P. Anex, Major Professor D. Raj Raman Anthony L. Pometto III. Kenneth J. Moore Robert C. Brown Iowa State University Ames, Iowa
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicological Profile for Ethylbenzene
    ETHYLBENZENE 151 5. PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL 5.1 PRODUCTION Ethylbenzene is primarily produced by the alkylation of benzene with ethylene in liquid-phase slurry reactors promoted with aluminum chloride catalysts or by vapor-phase reaction of benzene with dilute ethylene-containing feedstock with a boron trifluoride catalyst supported on alumina (Cannella 2007; Clayton and Clayton 1981; HSDB 2009; Welch et al. 2005; Ransley 1984). Newer versions of the method employ synthetic zeolites in fixed-bed reactors as catalysts for alkylation in the liquid phase or narrow pore synthetic zeolites in fixed-bed reactors in the vapor phase (Welch et al. 2005). Other methods of manufacturing ethylbenzene include preparation from acetophenone, dehydrogenation of naphthenes, catalytic cyclization and aromatization, separation from mixed xylenes via fractionation, reaction of ethylmagnesium bromide and chlorobenzene, extraction from coal oil, and recovery from benzene-toluene-xylene (BTX) processing(Clayton and Clayton 1981; HSDB 2009; Ransley 1984; Welch et al. 2005). Commercial grades of ethylbenzene may contain small amounts of m-xylene, p-xylene, cumene, and toluene (HSDB 2009). Ethylbenzene is traditionally ranked as one of the top 50 chemicals produced in the United States. Table 5-1 shows the historical production volumes of ethylbenzene from 1983 to 2005 (C&EN 1994a, 1994b, 1995, 2006; Kirschner 1995). Table 5-2 lists the facilities in each state that manufacture or process ethylbenzene, the intended use, and the range of maximum amounts of ethylbenzene that are stored on site. There are currently 3,755 facilities that produce, process, or use ethylbenzene in the United States. The data listed in Table 5-2 are derived from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI06 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Dehydrogenation of Ethanol to Acetaldehyde Over Different Metals Supported on Carbon Catalysts
    catalysts Article Dehydrogenation of Ethanol to Acetaldehyde over Different Metals Supported on Carbon Catalysts Jeerati Ob-eye , Piyasan Praserthdam and Bunjerd Jongsomjit * Center of Excellence on Catalysis and Catalytic Reaction Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; [email protected] (J.O.-e.); [email protected] (P.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +66-2-218-6874 Received: 29 November 2018; Accepted: 27 December 2018; Published: 9 January 2019 Abstract: Recently, the interest in ethanol production from renewable natural sources in Thailand has been receiving much attention as an alternative form of energy. The low-cost accessibility of ethanol has been seen as an interesting topic, leading to the extensive study of the formation of distinct chemicals, such as ethylene, diethyl ether, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate, starting from ethanol as a raw material. In this paper, ethanol dehydrogenation to acetaldehyde in a one-step reaction was investigated by using commercial activated carbon with four different metal-doped catalysts. The reaction was conducted in a packed-bed micro-tubular reactor under a temperature range of 250–400 ◦C. The best results were found by using the copper doped on an activated carbon catalyst. Under this specified condition, ethanol conversion of 65.3% with acetaldehyde selectivity of 96.3% at 350 ◦C was achieved. This was probably due to the optimal acidity of copper doped on the activated carbon catalyst, as proven by the temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD). In addition, the other three catalyst samples (activated carbon, ceria, and cobalt doped on activated carbon) also favored high selectivity to acetaldehyde (>90%).
    [Show full text]
  • Ethylene Glycol Ingestion Reviewer: Adam Pomerlau, MD Authors: Jeff Holmes, MD / Tammi Schaeffer, DO
    Pediatric Ethylene Glycol Ingestion Reviewer: Adam Pomerlau, MD Authors: Jeff Holmes, MD / Tammi Schaeffer, DO Target Audience: Emergency Medicine Residents, Medical Students Primary Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize signs and symptoms of ethylene glycol toxicity 2. Order appropriate laboratory and radiology studies in ethylene glycol toxicity 3. Recognize and interpret blood gas, anion gap, and osmolal gap in setting of TA ingestion 4. Differentiate the symptoms and signs of ethylene glycol toxicity from those associated with other toxic alcohols e.g. ethanol, methanol, and isopropyl alcohol Secondary Learning Objectives: detailed technical/behavioral goals, didactic points 1. Perform a mental status evaluation of the altered patient 2. Formulate independent differential diagnosis in setting of leading information from RN 3. Describe the role of bicarbonate for severe acidosis Critical actions checklist: 1. Obtain appropriate diagnostics 2. Protect the patient’s airway 3. Start intravenous fluid resuscitation 4. Initiate serum alkalinization 5. Initiate alcohol dehydrogenase blockade 6. Consult Poison Center/Toxicology 7. Get Nephrology Consultation for hemodialysis Environment: 1. Room Set Up – ED acute care area a. Manikin Set Up – Mid or high fidelity simulator, simulated sweat if available b. Airway equipment, Sodium Bicarbonate, Nasogastric tube, Activated charcoal, IV fluid, norepinephrine, Simulated naloxone, Simulate RSI medications (etomidate, succinylcholine) 2. Distractors – ED noise For Examiner Only CASE SUMMARY SYNOPSIS OF HISTORY/ Scenario Background The setting is an urban emergency department. This is the case of a 2.5-year-old male toddler who presents to the ED with an accidental ingestion of ethylene glycol. The child was home as the father was watching him. The father was changing the oil on his car.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHYLENE from METHANE (January 1994)
    Abstract Process Economics Program Report No. 208 ETHYLENE FROM METHANE (January 1994) This report evaluates two routes for the production of ethylene from methane: the direct synthesis based on the oxidative coupling of methane, and the less direct chemistry of converting methanol (which is derived from methane via synthesis gas) in the presence of an aluminophosphate molecular sieve catalyst. Our evaluations indicate that at the present state of development, the economics of both routes are unattractive when compared with the steam pyrolysis of hydrocarbons. We analyze the results of our evaluations to define the technical targets that must be attained for success. We also present a comprehensive technical review that examines not only the two routes evaluated, but also some of the more promising alternative approaches, such as synthesis gas conversion via a modified Fischer-Tropsch process, ethanol synthesis by the homologation of methanol, and ethylene production via methyl chloride. This report will be of interest to petrochemical companies that produce or consume ethylene and to energy-based companies (or equivalent government organizations in various countries) that have access to or control large resources of methane-rich natural gas. PEP’91 SCN CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2 SUMMARY 2-1 TECHNICAL REVIEW 2-1 Oxidative Coupling 2-1 Methanol Conversion to Ethylene 2-3 Modified Fischer-Tropsch (FT) Process 2-3 Methanol Homologation 2-3 Conversion via Methyl Chloride 2-4 SRI’S PROCESS CONCEPTS 2-4 Ethylene from Methane by Oxidative
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogenation of Ethylene on Metallic Catalysts
    S ro Hating Bure* M “"“^ piu&« Ubwu, Ml ®min’ JUN 2 1 1S68 A 1 1 1 2 mbESD NATX INST OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C. NSRDS-NBS 13 NSRDS 11 021 46250 ™SRDS.NB^ QC100 -U573 V13;1968 C.1 sH *- NBS-PUB-C 1964 ^f#Cf DftU NBS 'USUCATfONS Hydrogenation of Ethylene Metallic Catalysts U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS National Standard Reference Data Series National Bureau of Standards National Standard Reference Data System, Plan of Operation, NSRDS-NBS 1 — 15 cents* Thermal Properties of Aqueous Uni-univalent Electrolytes NSRDS-NBS 2 — 45 cents* Selected Tables of Atomic Spectra, Atomic Energy Levels and Multiplet Tables — Si II, Si ill, Si iv, NSRDS-NBS 3, Section 1—35 cents* Selected Tables of Atomic Spectra, Atomic Energy Levels and Multiplet Tables — Si I NSRDS — NBS 3, Section 2 — 20 cents* Atomic Transition Probabilities, Volume I, Hydrogen Through Neon, NSRDS-NBS 4 — $2.50* The Band Spectrum of Carbon Monoxide, NSRDS-NBS 5 — 70 cents* Tables of Molecular Vibrational Frequencies. Part 1, NSRDS-NBS 6 — 40 cents* High Temperature Properties and Decomposition of Inorganic Salts. Part 1. Sulfates, NSRDS-NBS 7-35 cents* Thermal Conductivity of Selected Materials, NSRDS-NBS 8 — $1.00* Tables of Biomolecular Gas Reactions, NSRDS-NBS 9 — $2.00* Selected Values of Electric Dipole Moments for Molecules in the Gas Phase, NSRDS- NBS 10 — 40 cents* Tables of Molecular Vibrational Frequencies, Part 2, NSRDS-NBS 11 — 30 cents* Tables for the Rigid Asymmetric Rotor: Transformation Coefficient from Symmetric to Asymmetric Bases Expectation Values of P\ and 4 NSRDS-NBS 12 — in press.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylene and Ethylene Hydrogenation on Alumina Supported Pd-Ag Model Catalysts
    Catalysis Letters Vol. 108, Nos. 3–4, May 2006 (Ó 2006) 159 DOI: 10.1007/s10562-006-0041-y Acetylene and ethylene hydrogenation on alumina supported Pd-Ag model catalysts N.A. Khan,* S. Shaikhutdinov, and H.-J. Freund Department of Chemical Physics, Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, Berlin 14195, Germany Received 20 December 2005; accepted 20 January 2006 Adsorption and co-adsorption of ethylene, acetylene and hydrogen on Pd-Ag particles, supported on thin alumina films, have been studied by temperature programmed desorption (TPD). The TPD results show that adding of Ag to Pd suppresses overall hydrogenation activity but increases selectivity towards ethylene, i.e. similar to that observed on real catalysts. The results are rationalized on the basis of a complex interplay between surface and subsurface hydrogen species available in the system, whereby the latter species are the most critical for total hydrogenation of acetylene to ethane. KEY WORDS: hydrogenation; bimetallic catalysts; acetylene; palladium; silver. The selective hydrogenation of acetylene is an alumina film both at low pressures (with TPD) and high industrially important catalytic process in the large-scale pressures (up to 1 bar, using gas chromatography [16– production of polyethylene, where a small quantity of 18]. Under both conditions, the ethylene hydrogenation acetylene (<3%) is present in ethylene feedstock. reaction was found to be structure insensitive. In Commercially, it is preferred to reduce the acetylene contrast, hydrogenation of 2-pentenes exhibited a sig- content to less than 10 ppm, which needs 99% acet- nificant particle size effect [19]. These studies have ylene conversion in the excess of ethylene [1].
    [Show full text]