DOCSLIB.ORG

(08) Mehmet Ali Kirpik

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(08) Mehmet Ali Kirpik Çankaya Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Journal of Arts and Sciences Say›: 4 / Aral›k 2005 Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r› ‹lleri Pepsinae ve Ceropalinae (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) Türleri Üzerine Faunistik Araflt›rmalar Mehmet Ali KIRPIK* Özet Bu çal›flmada Ankara, K›r›kkale ve Çank›r› illerinin Pepsinae ve Ceropalinae (Insecta:Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) türleri faunistik yönden araflt›r›lm›fl, türlerin Dünya ve Türkiye yay›l›fl› verilmifltir. Çal›flma sonunda araflt›rma bölgesinden 14 tür tespit edilmifl olup bunlardan 13 tanesi bölge faunas› için yeni kay›tt›r. Anahtar kelimeler: Insecta, Hymenoptera, Pepsinae, Ceropalinae, Pompilidae, Fauna, Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r›, Türkiye Abstract In this study, species of Pepsinae and Ceropalinae (Insecta:Hymenoptera:Pompilidae) of the provinces Ankara, K›r›kkale, and Çank›r› were studied faunisticaly and distribution of species in Turkey and in the world are given. At the end of study, totaly 14 species have been determined from the studied area. Of 14 species, 13 are new record for the fauna of the region. Key words: Insecta, Hymenoptera, Pepsinae, Ceropalinae, Pompilidae, Fauna, Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r›, Turkey. 1. G‹R‹fi Pompilidae Hymenoptera tak›m› içinde önemli familyalardan biridir. Ço¤unlukla soliter çok az bir k›sm› sosyal yaflar. Soliter yaflayanlar›n büyük bir k›sm› topra¤a yuva kazd›¤› halde, toprak çatlaklar›na, tafl yar›klar›na, a¤aç kabuklar›na, kurumufl bitki –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– * Kafkas Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Biyoloji Bölümü. Kars-Türkiye 71 Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r› ‹lleri Pepsinae ve Ceropalinae gövdesine, terk edilmifl akrep, kemirgen ve farkl› böcek yuvalar›n› kullananlar da vard›r. Sosyal yaflayanlar kumluk alanda birbirine çok yak›n olarak yuva kazarlar. Baz›lar› ise örümce¤i yuvas›nda sokup larvas›na besin sa¤lamakta ve kendiside onun yuvas›n› kullanmaktad›r (Day 1988). Pompilidlerin erginlerinin ço¤u nektarla beslenir. Ço¤u korollas› k›sa olan Compositae (Asteracea), Euphorbiaceae (F›ç›otugiller) ve Umbelliferae (Apiaceae) familyalar› bitkilerinden nektar al›rlar. Ceropales cinsine ait bireylerden çok az bir k›sm›n›n soktu¤u örümce¤in vücut s›v›s›n› emerek beslendi¤i bildirilmifltir (Day 1988). Öldükten sonra diflilerin antenlerinin koç boynuzu gibi k›vr›lmas›yla karakteristik olan Pompilidae türleri, larvalar› içinde örümcekleri avlamalar›yla örümcek ar›lar› olarak ta bilinirler. Ülkemizde ve çal›flma bölgesinde Pompilidae familyas› ile ilgili olarak flu ana kadar üç yabanc› ve bir yerli araflt›r›c›n›n çal›flmas› mevcuttur. 1961-1997 y›llar›n› kapsayan bu araflt›rmalar daha çok tarihi ve turistik bölge habitatlar›nda yap›lm›flt›r. Faunistik kay›t niteli¤i tafl›yan bu araflt›rmalar› yapan yabanc› araflt›r›c›lar flunlard›r: Moczar 1986, 1987, 1988; Türkiye’den toplam sekiz kay›t vermifl ve bunlardan bir tanesi bölgeye aittir. Priesner 1966, 1968; Türkiye’den toplam 71 tür kayd› vermifl ve bunlardan bir tanesi bölgeye aittir. Wolf 1966a, 1966b, 1971, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988a, 1988b, 1990a, 1990b, 1990c; Türkiye’den toplam 86 tür kayd› vermifl ve bunlardan 33 tanesi bölgeye aittir. Familya ile ilgili faunistik çal›flma tek yerli araflt›r›c› olarak, Özbek vd (1999, 2000) taraf›ndan yap›lm›flt›r. Bu yay›nlara göre 1965-1997 y›llar› aras›nda seyahat a¤›rl›kl› ve gezi amaçl› örnekler toplanarak de¤erlendirilmifltir. Sonuçta Türkiye’den toplam 230 tür kayd› verilmifl olup, bunlardan 50 tanesi bölgeye aittir. 2. MATERYAL VE METOT 1999-2003 tarihleri aras›nda atrapla toplanan örnekler, KCN ve Etilasetta öldürülmüfl olup laboratuarda müze materyali haline getirilmifltir. Prior marka binoküler mikroskopta incelenen türlerin teflhisinde Berland (1925), de Beumont (1970), Day (1988), Haupt ve Halle (1927), Muesebeck ve Krombein (1951), Özbek ve di¤erleri (1999, 2000), Leley (1987), Smith (1871), Wolf (1966a, 1971, 1986, 1992, 1993), Yevropoeyskoy (1978)’den yararlan›lm›flt›r. Teflhis edilen örneklerin kontrolü ve teflhisinde güçlük çekilen türler için Prof. Dr. Heinrich WOLF (Almanya)’dan yard›m al›nm›flt›r. 72 Mehmet Ali KIRPIK 3. ARAfiTIRMA BULGULARI Pepsinae Ashmead 1900 Cins: Priocnemis Schioedta 1837 Tür: Priocnemis parvula (Dahlbom 1845) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 2 ƂƂ) : Ankara: Etimesgut: Yaprac›k 1000 m 09. 08. 2000 1 Ƃ , Haymana: Merkez 1100 m 14. 07. 2001 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Norveç, ‹sveç, Finlandiya, ‹rlanda, Danimarka, ‹spanya, Fas, Korsika Adas›, Sardunya adas›, ‹talya, Yugoslavya, Arnavutluk, Macaristan, Romanya, Rusya, Türkmenistan, ‹ngiltere, ‹skoçya, ‹zlanda, Romanya, (Day 1988, Scobiola- Palade 1967, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Asiatik Türkiye, Erzurum, Samsun, Mersin (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999, Priesner 1968, Wolf 1971). Tür: Priocnemis minuta (Vander Linden 1827) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 3 ƂƂ , 1 ƃ ): Ankara: Haymana: Merkez 1110 m 09. 08. 2000 1 Ƃ , Kalecik: Merkez 700 m 24. 06. 2001 1 Ƃ , 1 ƃ ; Çank›r›: Çerkefl: Merkez 1000 m 26. 06. 2001 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: ‹sveç, Finlandiya, Hollanda, Belçika, Fransa, Almanya, Macaristan, Bulgaristan, Romanya, Yugoslavya, ‹talya, ‹spanya, Portekiz, K›br›s, Suriye, Romanya (Scobiola-Palade 1967) Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Antakya, Antalya, Bilecik, Erzurum, Hakkari, Isparta, Kars, Konya, Nevflehir, I¤d›r, Mersin, Sivas, Siirt, fianl›urfa, Kahramanmarafl (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Tür: Priocnemis vulgaris (Dufour 1841) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 7 ƂƂ , 1 ƃ ): Ankara: Alt›nda¤: Çubuk I Baraj› 950 m 29. 09. 1998 1 ƃ , Bala: Beynam orman› 1400 m 19. 05. 2001 1 Ƃ , Çankaya: A. Ü. Fen Fakültesi Bahçesi 850 m 13. 04. 2001 1 Ƃ , Çubuk: Durhasan 1350 m 08. 09. 1999 1Ƃ , Hasano¤lan: ‹drisda¤› 1750 m 10. 07. 2001 1 Ƃ , Yenimahalle: Karfl›yaka 950 m 01. 05. 2000 1 Ƃ ; Çank›r›: Ilgaz: Merkez 800 m 29. 07. 2000 1 Ƃ , Merkez 950 m 30. 07. 2000 1Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Almanya, Romanya (Scobiola-Palade 1967). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Adana, Antalya, Artvin, Bolu, Bitlis, Burdur, Erzincan, Erzurum, Hakkari, Isparta, ‹stanbul, Mersin, Kars, Konya, Nevflehir, Rize, Sivas, Van (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). 73 Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r› ‹lleri Pepsinae ve Ceropalinae Tür: Priocnemis agilis (Shuckard 1837) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 1 Ƃ ,1 ƃ )): Ankara: Çubuk: Durhasan 1350 m 08. 09. 1999 1Ƃ ; Çank›r›: Ilgaz: Merkez 950 m 30. 07. 2000 1 ƃ .. Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: ‹ngiltere, ‹zlanda (Day 1988) Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: I¤d›r, Uflak (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Tür: Priocnemis perturbator (Harris 1776) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 1 ƃ ): Ankara: Alt›nda¤: Çubuk I Baraj› 850 m 26. 03. 2000 1 ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Norveç, ‹sveç, Finlandiya, ‹ngiltere, Belçika, Hollanda, Lüksemburg, Fransa, ‹spanya, ‹talya, Arnavutluk, ‹skoçya, ‹rlanda, Almanya, Macaristan, Galler (Day 1988, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: ‹stanbul, Yalova (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Tür: Priocnemis gracilis Haupt 1927 ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 1 Ƃ ): Ankara: Ayafl: Merkez 900 m 27. 06. 2000 1 Ƃ Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Finlandiya, ‹sveç, Hollanda, Belçika, Fransa, Almanya, Macaristan, ‹talya, Çekoslavakya, ‹ngiltere, ‹rlanda (Day 1988, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Antakya, I¤d›r, Samsun, Sivas (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Tür: Priocnemis propinqua (Lepeletier 1847) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 2 ƂƂ ): Ankara: Ayafl: Merkez: 850 m 27. 06. 2000 1 Ƃ , Keçiören: Etlik 850 m 11. 06. 2001 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Fransa, ‹spanya, ‹ngiltere, Portekiz, Fas, Tunus, ‹talya, Çekoslavakya, Macaristan, Romanya, Yunanistan, Suriye (Day 1988, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Ankara, Antalya, Mersin, Kahramanmarafl, Konya, fianl›urfa (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Tür: Priocnemis fastigiata (Haupt 1934) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 1 ƃ ): Ankara: Haymana: Merkez 1100 m 14. 07. 2001 1 ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: ‹talya, Almanya, Çekoslavakya, Macaristan, Romanya, Yunanistan, ‹sveç, Fransa, ‹spanya, Portekiz, Cezayir (Priesner 1966, Wolf 1962, 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Antakya, Erzurum, Konya, Samsun (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999, Priesner 1968). 74 Mehmet Ali KIRPIK Tür: Priocnemis sulci (Balthasar 1943 ) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 1 Ƃ ): Ankara: Haymana: Merkez 24. 08. 2002 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Avusturya, Çekoslavakya, Macaristan, Yugoslavya, Romanya, ‹srail (Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Amasya, Hakkari, Mersin, Kars (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Cins: Dipogon Fox 1897 Tür: Dipogon variegatus (Linnaeus 1758) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 3 ƂƂ ): Ankara: Çankaya: 850 m 16. 07. 2001 1 Ƃ , Yenimahalle: Çayyolu 800 m 24. 06. 1999 2 ƂƂ ) . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Kuzey Avrupa, ‹ngiltere, Belçika, Fransa, Almanya, ‹sveç, ‹sviçre, Çekoslavakya, Macaristan, Romanya, Yugoslavya, Yunanistan, Malta, Kuzey Afrika, M›s›r, K›br›s, ‹ran, ‹ngiltere, ‹skoçya, ‹rlanda, Galler, ‹skoçya (Day 1988, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Antakya, Eskiflehir, Mu¤la, Tokat (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999, Priesner 1968). Tür: Dipogon erythrepus (Kohl 1888) ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 2 ƂƂ ): Ankara: Akyurt: Merkez 850 m 28. 06. 1999 1 Ƃ , Ayafl: Merkez 800 m 23. 09. 1999 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: , Kuzey Afrika, M›s›r, K›br›s, ‹ran, ‹ngiltere, (Day 1988, Wolf 1971). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Antakya, Ayd›n, Erzurum, Hakkari, Mersin, Kars (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999, Priesner 1968). Ceropalinae Ashmed 1900 Cins: Caliadurgus Lepeletier 1845 Tür: Caliadurgus fasciatellus (Spinola 1808) ‹ncelenen Materyal ( Toplam: 3 ƂƂ ): Çank›r›: Merkez 840 m 30. 07. 2000 1 Ƃ , Ilgaz: Merkez 950 m 30. 07. 2000 2 ƂƂ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Galler (Day 1988). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Erzurum, Trabzon, Tokat (Özbek ve di¤erleri 1999). Cins: Ceropales Latreille 1796 Tür: Ceropales helveticus Tournier 1889 75 Ankara, K›r›kkale, Çank›r› ‹lleri Pepsinae ve Ceropalinae ‹ncelenen Materyal (Toplam: 2 ƂƂ ): Ankara: Alt›nda¤ Çubuk I Baraj› 900 m 01. 05. 2000 1 Ƃ , Çankaya: Keklikp›nar› 1250 m 30. 07. 1999 1 Ƃ . Dünyadaki yay›l›fl›: Fransa, Portekiz, ‹spanya, ‹talya, ‹sviçre, Çekoslavakya, Polonya, Romanya, Bulgaristan, Fas, Türkmenistan (Wolf 1971, 1995). Türkiye’deki yay›l›fl›: Asiatik Türkiye, Antakya, Mersin (Priesner 1968, Wolf 1971).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • FORET DU GAVRE (Identifiant National : 520006609)
    Date d'édition : 22/07/2019 https://inpn.mnhn.fr/zone/znieff/520006609 FORET DU GAVRE (Identifiant national : 520006609) (ZNIEFF Continentale de type 2) (Identifiant régional : 10490000) La citation de référence de cette fiche doit se faire comme suite : Le Bail.J- LebosséJ- P,PIED Myriam-GANNE Olivier (Bretagne Vivante), .- 520006609, FORET DU GAVRE. - INPN, SPN-MNHN Paris, 118P. https://inpn.mnhn.fr/zone/znieff/520006609.pdf Région en charge de la zone : Pays-de-la-Loire Rédacteur(s) :Le Bail.J- LebosséJ-P,PIED Myriam-GANNE Olivier (Bretagne Vivante) Centroïde calculé : 288138°-2289726° Dates de validation régionale et nationale Date de premier avis CSRPN : 09/11/2006 Date actuelle d'avis CSRPN : 24/06/2019 Date de première diffusion INPN : 19/07/2019 Date de dernière diffusion INPN : 19/07/2019 1. DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. CRITERES D'INTERET DE LA ZONE ........................................................................................... 4 3. CRITERES DE DELIMITATION DE LA ZONE .............................................................................. 4 4. FACTEUR INFLUENCANT L'EVOLUTION DE LA ZONE ............................................................. 4 5. BILAN DES CONNAISSANCES - EFFORTS DES PROSPECTIONS ........................................... 5 6. HABITATS ...................................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Du Nouveau Chez Les Pompilidae De La Manche
    Du nouveau chez les Pompilidae de la Manche Le premier inventaire de ces hyménoptères, accompagné d’une riche introduction à leur biologie, a paru au printemps 2005 dans les colonnes de L’Argiope (N°48) sous la plume de Henri CHEVIN. La quasi-totalité des insectes, examinés et identifiés par le spécialiste bien connu en Europe de l’Ouest Raymond WAHIS, provenaient des captures de l’auteur et, dans leur grande majorité, de son rayon d’action privilégié, le Cotentin, en particulier Bolleville et ses environs, la forêt domaniale de St-Sauveur-le-Vicomte, la lande de Vesly, le cap de Carteret. Ce catalogue départemental, qui comprenait 31 espèces, était alors l’un des premiers réalisés en France, après celui de la Nièvre (MARION 1978, 42 espèces) et juste en même temps que le formidable inventaire des pompiles de l’Ardèche (WAHIS & SMISSEN 2005, 66 espèces !). Tout récemment viennent de sortir les listes du Puy-de-Dôme (DURAND 2007) et de la Corse qui abrite un nombre record de 74 pompiles dont 7 endémiques (WAHIS 2007). Rappelons que la faune d’Europe de l’Ouest compte 156 taxons (WAHIS, 2006). Au cours des trois saisons qui ont suivi, 2005 et 2006 notamment, l’année 2007 ayant été catastrophique sur le plan climatique, nous avons tous augmenté notre effort de prospection sur cette famille et notablement élargi le domaine géographique envisagé. C’est ainsi que 8 nouvelles espèces ont pu être ajoutées à la liste de la Manche. Ce sont elles surtout qui font l’objet de cet article. Juste une précision préalable : en 2006, R.
    [Show full text]
  • East Wales in 2013: Borras Quarry and Marford Quarry
    Brownfield sites and their value for invertebrates – A survey of selected sand quarries in north- east Wales in 2013: Borras Quarry and Marford Quarry Bryan Formstone and Mike Howe* *Natural Resources Wales NRW Evidence Report No. 21 Date NRW Evidence Report No. 21 About Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is the organisation responsible for the work carried out by the three former organisations, the Countryside Council for Wales, Environment Agency Wales and Forestry Commission Wales. It is also responsible for some functions previously undertaken by Welsh Government. Our purpose is to ensure that the natural resources of Wales are sustainably maintained, used and enhanced, now and in the future. We work for the communities of Wales to protect people and their homes as much as possible from environmental incidents like flooding and pollution. We provide opportunities for people to learn, use and benefit from Wales' natural resources. We work to support Wales' economy by enabling the sustainable use of natural resources to support jobs and enterprise. We help businesses and developers to understand and consider environmental limits when they make important decisions. We work to maintain and improve the quality of the environment for everyone and we work towards making the environment and our natural resources more resilient to climate change and other pressures. Evidence at Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is an evidence based organisation. We seek to ensure that our strategy, decisions, operations and advice to Welsh Government and others are underpinned by sound and quality-assured evidence. We recognise that it is critically important to have a good understanding of our changing environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pompilidae - Spinnendoders Verspreiding H
    Pompilidae - spinnendoders Verspreiding H. Nieuwenhuijsen & V. Lefeber Spinnendoders komen overal ter wereld voor, met uitzonde- Spinnendoders hebben een slank lichaam en lange poten. ring van de poolstreken. Het grootste aantal soorten leeft in In het veld zijn ze goed te herkennen aan hun manier van de tropen, maar ook in subtropische klimaten zijn spinnen- voortbewegen: ze wisselen korte stukjes rennen af met korte doders rijk vertegenwoordigd. In West-Europa en andere stukjes vliegen.Tijdens het rennen bewegen ze voortdurend koele streken is het aantal soorten aanzienlijk geringer. hun vleugels. Dit gedrag maakt op de waarnemer een nogal Wereldwijd schat men het aantal soorten op 4000 tot 5000 nerveuze indruk en dat heeft de spinnendoders de bijnaam (HANSON & GAULD 1995). In Europa komen ongeveer 800 soorten ‘Hymenoptera neurotica’ opgeleverd. voor (SCHMID-EGGER & WOLF 1992). In West-Europa zijn 157 soor- De Nederlandse soorten hebben een lichaamslengte van 3 ten gevonden (WAHIS 1986), waarvan 66 in Nederland. tot 15 mm. Spinnendoders in onze klimaatzone zijn geheel zwart of zwart met gele of rode banden en vlekken. Veel Biologie soorten zijn overwegend zwart met een rode achterlijfsbasis. De Nederlandse spinnendoders zijn vooral bekend van Sommige mooi gekleurde tropische soorten (genus Pepsis) droge, warme biotopen. Vooral Pompilinae verkiezen warme, jagen op vogelspinnen en behoren met een lichaamslengte zandige habitats waar ze in de zon, snel rennend en kleine van acht centimeter en een vleugelspanwijdte van tien cen- stukjes vliegend, kunnen worden aangetroffen. Veel Pepsi- timeter tot de grootste Hymenoptera ter wereld. nae prefereren koelere plekken met een rijke vegetatie zoals bosranden, lichte bossen, grazige terreinen en muren (SCHMID- Taxonomie EGGER & WOLF 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Vespoidea: Pompilidae (Hrabalkovití)
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 16.xi.2007 Supplementum 11, pp. 111-131 ISSN 0231-8571 Vespoidea: Pompilidae (hrabalkovití) Jakub STRAKA Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Checklist of Pompilidae of the Czech Republic and Slovakia is pre- sented: 100 species are known from the Czech Republic (85 from Bohemia, 92 from Moravia), and 99 from Slovakia. Anoplius alpinobalticus Wolf, 1965 and Priocnemis fastigiata Haupt, 1934 are new species for Bohemia, Arachnospila conjungens (Kohl 1898), Arachnospila rufa (Haupt, 1927) and Dipogon mon- ticolus Wahis, 1972 are new species for Slovakia. Occurrence of the following rare species was confi rmed: Priocnemis pellipleuris Wahis, 1998, Poecilagenia rubricans (Lepeletier, 1845), Arachnospila westerlundi (Morawitz, 1893), Tachy- agetes fi licornis (Tournier, 1889), and Anoplius tenuicornis (Tournier, 1889) for the Czech Republic, Dipogon vechti Day, 1979 and Auplopus rectus (Haupt, 1926) for Bohemia, Aporus pollux (Kohl, 1888), Dicyrtomellus tingitanus (Wolf, 1966), and Priocnemis pellipleuris for Slovakia. The following species have been condi- tionally removed from the Slovak fauna until the material is revised: Priocnemis baltica Blüthgen, 1944, P. bellieri Sichel, 1860, P. diversa Junco, 1947, P. fallax Verhoeff, 1922, P. massaliensis Soyer, 1945, Arachnospila consobrina (Dahlbom, 1843), Evagetes sahlbergi (Morawitz, 1893), Anoplius tenuicornis (Tournier, 1889), and Episyron funerarium (Tournier, 1889). Majority of these species are highly unlikely to occur in Slovakia. Key words. Hymenoptera, Vespoidea, Pompilidae, checklist, new records, Czech Republic, Bohemia, Moravia, Slovakia Introduction The family Pompilidae (spider wasps) Čeleď hrabalkovití (Pompilidae) je ve comprises about 120 described genera and světě zastoupena přibližně 120 rody se zhruba about 5000 described species (WASBAUER 5000 dosud popsanými druhy (WASBAUER 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenovaria 18
    nummer 18 april 2019 Nieuwsbrief Sectie Hymenoptera Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging In dit nummer onder meer: Verslag voorjaarsexcursies Leuke waarnemingen in 2018 Monitoring van bestuivers op fruit in Zeeland Wilde bijen op de rivierduinrelicten in de Scheldevallei stroomafwaarts De Nederlandse graafwespen – stand van zaken Verslag van een Insektenschutzsymposium in Stuttgart nr. 18, april 2019 ISSN 1387-1773 Foto voorpagina: Anthidium manicatum , man. Foto: Pieter van Breugel. Nieuwsbrief sectie Hymenoptera van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging Vormgeving: Jan Smit. Redactie J. D’Haeseleer, T. Peeters, J. Smit, E. van der Spek Redactieadres Voermanstraat 14, 6921 NP Duiven e-mail: [email protected] Website www.hymenovaria.nl Redactioneel Dit is een uitzonderlijk goed gevuld nummer van onze en Vlaanderen’, Theo Peeters bespreekt het boek over nieuwsbrief: 63 pagina’s. Gewoontegetrouw beginnen de verborgen wereld van de Strabrechtse heide en Erik we met de aankondiging van onze excursies. van der Spek stelt weer enkele resultaten van Vervolgens de verslagen van de excursies van het onderzoek voor. afgelopen jaar. In dit eerste nummer van het jaar de leuke In de buitenlandrubriek een verslag van de waarnemingen van het afgelopen jaar (2018). Hymenopterologentagung van oktober 2018 in Verder een drietal veldobservaties. Stuttgart en een verslag van een symposium over het uitsterven van insecten, daaraan voorafgaande in We hebben een veelheid aan artikelen: Lucien Calle Stuttgart. Met 9 punten ter aanbeveling voor een doet verslag van de monitoring van bestuivers in betere bescherming van insecten. Verder verslag van Zeeland, er is een vervolg op de Nederlandse namen een bezoek aan het KBIN te Brussel door Theo voor bijen- en graafwespenfamilies, Pieter Vanorme- Peeters, Wim Klein en André van Eck.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Legislation Summary
    © Ian Wallace Policy and Legislation Summary Legal disclaimer Whilst every effort has been made to be accurate in explaining complex legislation in layman’s language, this document does not constitute legal advice and neither the authors nor Buglife can guarantee the accuracy thereof. Anyone using the information does so at his/her own risk and shall be deemed to indemnify Buglife from any and all injury or damage arising from such use. SPECIES STATUS: LISTS OF INVERTEBRATE SPECIES COVERED BY POLICY AND LEGISLATION IN THE UK The following tables list the invertebrate species covered by the UK’s domestic wildlife legislation, national biodiversity policies and relevant international statutes. Most of these measures aim to protect vulnerable species, but some invasive alien species are also covered by legislation. The tables are as follows: 1. UK invertebrate species protected by international statutes 2A. Invertebrate species listed on Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) for England and Wales and the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004. 2B. Invertebrate species protected under the Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order 1985 (as amended) 3A. Invertebrate species listed under Section 41 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act for England and under Section 42 for Wales 3B. Invertebrate species of principal importance for the conservation of biodiversity in Scotland 4. Invertebrate species endangered by trade and listed under the EU CITES Regulations 5A. Invertebrate species listed on Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 9 (as amended) 5B. Invertebrate species listed on Schedule 9 of the Wildlife (Northern Ireland) Order (as amended) Further information For up to date information on UK legislation visit http://www.legislation.gov.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 the Leeds Naturalist
    The Leeds Naturalist Newsletter Winter 2016 THE LEEDS NATURALIST NEWSLETTER NUMBER 10 Field trip to Ledsham Dale on 10th August 2016 This meeting was attended by 6 members. The day was overcast with only light winds. Rain began as the meeting headed for its traditional pub lunch.. Perhaps because of the weather but mainly because of the late date some of the usual highlights were not pre- sent, notably Autumn Ladies Tresses and Marbled White butterfly. There was no visible trace of the Pasque flower or of its enclosure. But there were compensations. A male Brown Argus was the first for some years but there were few other butterflies. The large cuckoo bees, Bombus bohemi- Brown Argus cus and B. vestalis were plentiful. A magnificent Vol- ucella inanis was present together with V. pellucens, lots of Eristalis arbustorum, Syrphus vitripennis and Epistrophe grossulariae. Good numbers of Meadow grasshoppers, mostly in late instars, was an indica- tion of grassland quality. Two dragonfly species, Aeshna mixta and A. grandis were hunting over the reserve. Common buzzard and a distant Yellowhammer were the only birds noted. Bombus vestalis male malemalemale Bombus bohemicus male Volucella inanis Feedback and questions to John Bowers: [email protected] The Leeds Naturalist Newsletter Winter 2016 Botany Report for 2016 Phyll Abbott writes: Our field meetings were rather disappointing botanically. At Led- sham the grass had grown tall and was smothering many of the smaller plants, and there was no sign of the Pasque flower (Pulsatilla vulgaris). Similarly at Hetchell Wood we had to search diligently for another of our rarities, the Thistle Broomrape (Orobanche reticula- ta).
    [Show full text]
  • JOINTS NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Provisional Atlas Of
    JOINTS Centre for NAT URE Ecology & Hydrology CONSERVATION COMM ITTE E N AT U RA L EN V IRO N M ENT RE SEA RC H CO U N CIL t t i P r o v isio n a l at la s o f th e a c u le a te H y m e n o p t e r a it 0 Co OE: o f Br ita in a n d Ir e l an t ,, CI t CI P a r t 5 GEE , I IC ei Ro b in Ed w ar d s (Ed i to r) Bees , W as p s a n d An ts Re co r d lig So c te r), Ga v in Br o ad ( Ed ito r ) Bib lo g iCal Re c o r d s Cen t re C e n t re fo r Eco lo g y a n d H yd r o log y N atural Environment Research Co uncil NERC Copyright 2005 Printed in 2005 by RMG. St Ives ISBN 1 870393 78 3 The Centre fo r Ecology and Hydrology (CEH ) is the UK's Centre of Excellence for research in the land and freshwater envi ronmental sciences. Our parent body is th e Natural Environment Research Council i NERC) CEH's statf have specialist skills in a wide range of environmental ranging in scale no m the gene to whole Earth systems. Our research i • aimed at improv ing ou r understanding of both the environment and die pi/messes that underlie the Earth's sup port systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbs, D.J (2019). Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol
    INVERTEBRATE MONITORING OF TROOPERS HILL, BRISTOL David J. Gibbs 07 January 2020 This report was produced for Friends of Troopers Hill, funded by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. David J. Gibbs Orchard Cottage Cecil Road Weston-super-Mare BS23 2NF [email protected] Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol David J. Gibbs 2019 This report should be quoted as: Gibbs, D.J (2019). Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol. Report to Friends of Troopers Hill. Cover photograph: Dasystoma salicella captured on 11 April. 2 Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol David J. Gibbs 2019 Contents 1 Summary.............................................................................................................................4 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................4 3 Survey Methodology ..........................................................................................................4 3.1 Sampling Techniques .................................................................................................4 3.2 Sample Timing ...........................................................................................................5 3.3 Constraints ..................................................................................................................5 3.4 Identification...............................................................................................................5 3.5 Taxonomic Coverage
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Pollinators Associated with Decaying Wood, Old Trees and Tree Wounds in Great Britain
    A REVIEW OF THE POLLINATORS ASSOCIATED WITH DECAYING WOOD, OLD TREES AND TREE WOUNDS IN GREAT BRITAIN Steven Falk 2021 A report for the Woodland Trust Pollinators associated with decaying wood and old trees. Steven Falk 2021 Contents Summary 1 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………..………………6 1.1 Background and objectives…………………………………………………………………………….…..6 1.2 What is a pollinator?...............................................................................................6 1.3 What is a saproxylic insect?………………………………………………………………………………..7 2 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..9 2.1 Ascertaining lifecycles…………………………………………………………………………………….…..9 2.2 Ascertaining flowers visited………………………………………………………………………………10 2.3 Taxonomic scope………………………………………………………………………………………………11 2.4 Geographic scope……………………………………………………………………………..………………12 2.5 Ascertaining conservation statuses……………………………………………….………………….12 2.6 Checking national distributions…………………………………………………………………………12 2.7 Format of species accounts……………………………………………………………………………….13 2.8 Nomenclature and naming conventions……………………………………………………………13 2.9 Limitations………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….14 3 Results…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..15 3.1 A provisional list of Britain’s flower-visiting saproxylics (Table 1)……………….……..15 3.2 General diversity……………………………………………………………………………………………….24 3.3 Ecological assemblages…………………………………………………………………………….……….24 3.4 Rare and threatened species……………………………………………………………………..……..25 4 A review of the Coleoptera (beetles)………………………………………………………………..…26
    [Show full text]