DOCSLIB.ORG

2012-AAA-Annual-Report.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Borders & Crossings New Ways to Generate Conversations & Experiences 2012 ANNUAL REPORT EXECUTIVE BOARD AND COMMITTEES 2012 AAA Linguistic Seat Section Assembly Committee on the Executive Board Niko Besnier EB Seat #1 Future of Print (2011–14) Gabriela Vargas– and Electronic President Publishing University of Cetina Leith Mullings (2010–12) Deborah Nichols (2011–13) Amsterdam Universidad The Graduate Center Committee on Minority Seat Autonoma de Yucatan of the City University Gender Equity in Ana L Aparicio Anthropology of New York Section Assembly (2010–13) Jennifer R Weis EB Seat #2 Northwestern President–Elect/Vice Ida Susser University Committee for President (2010–13) Monica Heller Human Rights Practicing/ Hunter College, (2011–13) Ilana Feldman Professional Seat City University of Jessica Winegar University of Toronto, Alisse Waterston New York Ontario Institute for (2010–13) Committee on Labor Studies in Education John Jay College of Treasurer–Ex Officio Relations Criminal Justice, Edward Liebow Michael Chibnik Secretary City University of (2008–12) Debra L Martin New York Battelle Committee on (2009–12) Minority Issues in University of Nevada, Student Seat Anthropology Las Vegas Jason E Miller AAA Committees Simon Craddock Lee (2009–12) and Chairs Section Assembly University of South Committee on Convenor Annual Meeting Practicing, Applied Florida Program Chair Vilma Santiago– and Public Interest Carolyn Rouse Anthropology Irizarry Undesignated #1 (2011–13) Keri Brondo Hugh Gusterson Anthropological Cornell University (2009–12) Communications Committee on Committee George Mason Public Policy Archaeology Seat University Alisse Waterston Sandra L Lopez Varela Elisa J Sobo (2011–14) Association Undesignated #2 Committee Departamento Operations Susan D Gillespie on World de Antropología, Committee (2010–13) Anthropologies Universidad Florence Babb University of Florida Setha Low Autónoma del Estado Gustavo Lins Ribeiro Audit Committee de Morelos Undesignated #3 Hugh Gusterson Frances E Mascia–Lees Finance Committee Biological Seat (2011–14) Edward Liebow David Himmelgreen Awards Committee Rutgers University Susan Gillespie (2011–14) Nominations University of South Undesignated #4 Committee Committee on Ethics Florida Jean J Schensul Debra L Martin Lise Dobrin (2009–12) Cultural Seat Resource Institute for Florence E Babb Development Community Research (2009–12) Committee University of Florida Louise Lamphere 2012 ANNUAL REPORT New WaysBorders to Generate & Conversations Crossings & Experiences TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Board and Committees inside front cover Statement of Purposes 2 Letter from the President and Executive Director 3 Borders & Crossings: Ethical Currents 4 Association Briefs 6 Staff Update: Arrivals and Departures 8 Long Time Executive Director Retires 9 2012 AAA Photo Contest Award Winners 10 Public Education: Migration & Displacement 12 Borders and Crossings: Policy Impacts 13 2012 Annual Report 2012 AAA Award Winners 14 Statement of Financial Position 18 Statement of Activities 19 • American Anthropological Association • American Anthropological 2012 AAA Section Award Winners 20 AAA Staff and Publications inside back cover 2012 Donor Recognition inside back cover 1 Statement of Purposes of the American Anthropological Association The purposes of the Association shall be to advance anthropology as the science that studies humankind in all its aspects through archaeological, biological, ethnological, and linguistic research; and to further the professional interests of American anthropologists, including the dissemination of anthropological knowledge and its use to solve human problems. Taken from the Articles of Incorporation & Bylaws, amended and restated in October 1983, of the American Anthropological Association. From the Association Leadership s your Association’s President and Executive Director, we are pleased to provide this report on AAA’s signature activities, programs and accomplishments during the past year. We took some important steps in 2012 to advance the Association. We are making our public profile more visible, and engaging in enduring new partnerships. We continue to improve member support and guidance. This year, we put the finishing touches on the career scholars a chance to gain a first-hand sense AAssociation’s revised Statement on Ethics, completing of Association leadership service opportunities. To a five-year review process that involved several rounds highlight the enduring contributions of our long term of member engagement, comment and feedback. members, we have created our Distinguished Members The Statement on Ethics—Principles of Professional program. These members receive special recognition at Responsibility offers guidance to anthropologists about our Annual Meeting and are profiled in Anthropology appropriate conduct in professional and academic News. The Executive Board approved two new sections: Leith Mullings settings, collecting and disseminating research the Association for the Anthropology of Policy President (2012–13) data, and establishing and maintaining respectful promotes the study of policy, including its makings, relationships with research subjects, colleagues and working and effects, and the Society of Economic students. Organized around seven basic principles, the Anthropology, formerly a separate organization, 2012 Statement on Ethics has a new, interactive format formally merged with the AAA. that encourages member commentary and cases. Finally, building on the terrific success of our public As part of our ongoing efforts to increase the education initiative, RACE: Are We So Different?, AAA Association’s public visibility, we have been active announced this past year its intent to create a new in the past year in working with a number of media initiative with a focus on migration and displacement. Edward Liebow outlets to highlight anthropologists’ work, and This new public education initiative will draw on Executive Director accurately portray the discipline. We have helped policymakers and elected This year, we put the finishing touches on the Association’s revised officials see the value of Statement on Ethics, completing a five-year review process that involved our work, pointing out how a large segment several rounds of member engagement, comment and feedback. 2012 Annual Report of our membership is involved in pushing the frontiers of knowledge expertise from all sub-fields of the discipline. It will about the human condition through research and speak to historical movements of people, displacement, training, while a growing segment are involved in such inequality, incorporation and a host of other issues, endeavors as improving healthcare and educational guided by a broad-based working group and systems, working towards environmental sustainability, supported with key partnerships like the Wenner-Gren cultural heritage protection, reducing global Foundation, Northwestern University, the Smithsonian Association • American Anthropological inequalities, and increasing awareness of the many Institution, among others. forms of household and family that raise our children This year’s Annual Report draws on the theme of the and take care of our elderly. 2012 Annual Meeting, Borders and Crossings. As you Speaking of members and your interests, we have review this report, we ask that you help us celebrate the taken some key steps in the past year to recognize accomplishments of the past year, and also reflect on your contributions and expand ways of engaging how we can best help you in achieving our long-term with the Association. Our Leadership Fellows program goals of disseminating anthropological knowledge and continued in its fourth year, providing six early using such knowledge to solve human problems. Leith Mullings Edward Liebow President Executive Director 3 ➔ ➝ Borders & Crossings: Ethical Currents AAA Finalizes Revisions to Ethics Code fter a five-year review process, members of the American Anthropological Association approved a rigorous overhaul of the association’s code of Ethics in 2012. The code offers guidance to anthropologists concerning responsible conduct in professional and academic settings, in collecting and disseminating research data, and in their relationships with research subjects, colleagues and students. The new document, titled“Statement on Ethics: Principles of Professional AResponsibility,” strengthens the previous ethics code, adapts it to the digital age, and makes use of a fundamentally new format. The first AAA ethics code was written in 1971, in your records, and maintain respectful and ethical response to controversies over anthropologists’ professional relationships. involvement in the Vietnam War. Where previous This 2012 revision has its origins in a controversy AAA ethics codes resembled legal codes, the over U.S. Army human terrain teams five years new Principles of Professional Responsibility take ago. In response to that controversy the AAA the form of a hyperlinked living document in a convened a Task Force on Comprehensive Ethics simple, user-friendly format. While still offering Review, chaired by Dena Plemmons (U California- guidance for ethical conduct in the form of San Diego). The membership of that Task Force general principles, the new document features was carefully chosen to represent the different embedded hypertext links to pertinent case study sub-disciplines of anthropology as well as a range materials, reference documents, websites and of opinions on anthropological work for the
Recommended publications
  • 24 Labor As Seen by Social Anthropology José Sergio Leite

    24 Labor As Seen by Social Anthropology José Sergio Leite

    24 Labor As Seen By Social Anthropology José Sergio Leite Lopes 1 1. Introduction: the economic sphere and labor in social anthropology Anthropologists have traditionally studied labor in their monographs about indigenous groups, ethnic minorities, the peasantry, fishers and artisans. In these studies of labor, as in the economic sphere in general, it appears as enmeshed in the totality of the social life of these “traditional”, “pre-capitalist” groups. Generally such anthropological studies focus on the centrality of gift giving and reciprocity, which negate or obscure economic interests for the benefit of the logic of honor or of symbolic capital. They regard the gift as a total social fact where the market principal is subordinated to that of reciprocity and redistribution. Labor in these studies is not the central theme of interest, but appears in a form subordinated to other aspects with which it is interrelated. Between the 1950s and 1970s, anthropologists engaged with the question of the critical application or appropriation of concepts from diverse currents of so-called economic theory. Such concepts were constructed to explain the capitalist economy, but anthropologists embraced these economic principles in general to understand all societies. A debate arose between “substantivists”, who praised the historicity of concepts and the necessity of new instruments for the economic analysis of non-capitalist societies and the “formalists” who gave a wider reach to existing economic theories to apply to their ethnographies. The substantivists were located in some American universities and drew heavily on the work of and disciples of the Hungarian economic historian Karl Polanyi; later they would have an important repercussion in the whole anthropological field.
  • November 2006

    November 2006

    Volume 17, Number 4 November 2006 PRESIDENT’S LETTER By Donald D. Stull [[email protected]] University of Kansas Anthropology, or any other subject, cannot avoid the context in which it is done. And we cannot afford to be out of touch with our times. Paul Bohannon n the November 2006 issue of Anthropology News, Elizabeth Tunstall announces that American anthropology suffers from a I“branding problem,” and she reports on preliminary research, which concludes, “the popular perceptions of anthropology are of a field engaged in the scientific study of primitive peoples (exoticism) or the distant past (dirt, bones, and Indiana Jones,” (Anthropology News 47(8): 17, 2006). More than a decade ago, Paula Rubel and Abraham Rosman observed that anthropology finds itself “in a stage of disintegration and fragmentation into myriad subdisciplines, subspecialties, and interest groups, all of which empha- size their differences and uniqueness rather than what they have in common” (Journal of Anthropo- logical Research 50(4):335, 1994). It still does. Anthropology, it would seem, is not only misunderstood by what we like to call “the Other,” but roiling with internecine dissension and turmoil. IN THIS ISSUE Page For several decades now, in fact, anthropology has suffered from what Paul Bohannon called a catastrophe SfAA President’s Letter 1 in its epigenetic landscape (American Anthropologist Obituaries 82(3):512, 1980). An epigenetic landscape is “one that Foster, George 3 changes and moves because of the very activity that Lantis, Margaret 16 goes on within it. A catastrophe takes place when the 2007 Annual Meetings in Tampa 17 epigenetic landscape changes to the point that one of Grappling with Tough Issues 19 its valleys, wherein social action has been flowing, is Rethinking Cosmopolitan 21 blocked or diverted to new courses.” Such valleys are Minding Your Business 24 called chreods.
  • Paper Download (202184 Bytes)

    Paper Download (202184 Bytes)

    EASA Biennial Conference Experiencing Diversity and Mutuality Ljubljana, Slovenia 26-30 August 2008 Ships passing in the night? Interdisciplinarity, East-West relations and commoditization of knowledge in anthropology of post-socialism Kacper Pobłocki Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology Central European University, Budapest, Hungary Abstract: Debates on 'native anthropology', 'anthropology with an accent' and so forth have usually focused on colonialism as the main culprit of asymmetric relations between anthropological knowledges. By bringing the recent dispute between Western and 'native' anthropologist of post-socialism into the 'world anthropologies' debate, I seek to highlight those aspects of current epistemic inequalities that are not post-colonial in nature, but result from global commoditization of knowledge. I ponder why Western anthropologists who started visiting Eastern Europe from the 1970s, concluded that 'native' academic knowledge is inferior to their own output. This was not due to a prejudice brought from afar, I argue, but rather was a result of their field experiences. I discuss how three types of native 'captive minds' (communist, nationalist, and neo-liberal) emerged, and how encountering (or learning about) them made Western anthropologist uninterested in (and distrustful of) local epistemic production. I focus on the putative nationalist 'captive mind', and argue that the straw man of East European 'positivist' science (as opposed to the superior 'theory-oriented' Western anthropology) emerged due to recent changes in the political economy of the academia. I show how the 'theoretical turn' was experienced differently in Western and Polish academia, and how these changes, explained by the different regimes of value, show that there has been an increase only in 'ritual' exchange between parochial and metropolitan anthropology rather than meaningful communication.
  • Hilton Portland Downtown Portland, Oregon March 19-23, 2019

    Hilton Portland Downtown Portland, Oregon March 19-23, 2019

    Society for Applied Anthropology • 79th Annual Meeting Hilton Portland Downtown Portland, Oregon March 19-23, 2019 Contents Hilton Portland Downtown Map .................................................................................................... ii Welcome from the Program Chair ................................................................................................ iii SfAA 2019 Program Committee .................................................................................................... iv Officers of the Society for Applied Anthropology, Board of Directors, and Editors ............... iv Special Thanks and Co-Sponsors ...................................................................................................v Past Presidents and Annual Meeting Sites .................................................................................. viii General Information How to Use This Program .................................................................................................1 A Note About Abstracts .....................................................................................................1 Registration .......................................................................................................................1 Book Exhibit .....................................................................................................................1 Plenary Sessions ................................................................................................................1 Social Events
  • Issue Information

    Issue Information

    Juengst and Becker, Editors Editors and Becker, Juengst of Community The Bioarchaeology 28 AP3A No. The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the ISSN 1551-823X American Anthropological Association, Number 28 aapaa_28_1_cover.inddpaa_28_1_cover.indd 1 112/05/172/05/17 22:26:26 PPMM The Bioarchaeology of Community Sara L. Juengst and Sara K. Becker, Editors Contributions by Sara K. Becker Deborah Blom Jered B. Cornelison Sylvia Deskaj Lynne Goldstein Sara L. Juengst Ann M. Kakaliouras Wendy Lackey-Cornelison William J. Meyer Anna C. Novotny Molly K. Zuckerman 2017 Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, Number 28 ARCHEOLOGICAL PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION Lynne Goldstein, General Series Editor Number 28 THE BIOARCHAEOLOGY OF COMMUNITY 2017 Aims and Scope: The Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association (AP3A) is published on behalf of the Archaeological Division of the American Anthropological Association. AP3A publishes original monograph-length manuscripts on a wide range of subjects generally considered to fall within the purview of anthropological archaeology. There are no geographical, temporal, or topical restrictions. Organizers of AAA symposia are particularly encouraged to submit manuscripts, but submissions need not be restricted to these or other collected works. Copyright and Copying (in any format): © 2017 American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior permission in writing from the copyright holder.
  • Centeredness As a Cultural and Grammatical Theme in Maya-Mam

    Centeredness As a Cultural and Grammatical Theme in Maya-Mam

    CENTEREDNESS AS A CULTURAL AND GRAMMATICAL THEME IN MAYA-MAM DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Wesley M. Collins, B.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Examination Committee: Approved by Professor Donald Winford, Advisor Professor Scott Schwenter Advisor Professor Amy Zaharlick Department of Linguistics Copyright by Wesley Miller Collins 2005 ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I look at selected Maya-Mam anthropological and linguistic data and suggest that they provide evidence that there exist overlapping cultural and grammatical themes that are salient to Mam speakers. The data used in this study were gathered largely via ethnographic methods based on participant observation over my twenty-five year relationship with the Mam people of Comitancillo, a town of 60,000 in Guatemala’s Western Highlands. For twelve of those years, my family and I lived among the Mam, participating with them in the cultural milieu of daily life. In order to help shed light on the general relationship between language and culture, I discuss the key Mayan cultural value of centeredness and I show how this value is a pervasive organizing principle in Mayan thought, cosmology, and daily living, a value called upon by the Mam in their daily lives to regulate and explain behavior. Indeed, I suggest that centeredness is a cultural theme, a recurring cultural value which supersedes social differences, and which is defined for cultural groups as a whole (England, 1978). I show how the Mam understanding of issues as disparate as homestead construction, the town central plaza, historical Mayan religious practice, Christian conversion, health concerns, the importance of the numbers two and four, the notions of agreement and forgiveness, child discipline, and moral stance are all instantiations of this basic underlying principle.
  • 2017 Annual Report.Pub

    2017 Annual Report.Pub

    Annual Report For 2017 “Supporting worldwide research in all branches of Anthropology” Table of Contents Chair’s Introduction ..................................................................................... 3 President’s Report ....................................................................................... 4 Program Highlights SAPIENS & Institutional Development Grants ..................................... 6 Wenner-Gren Symposia Overview ...................................................... 10 Current Anthropology Supplementary Issues .................................... 11 Historical Archives Program ................................................................ 12 International Symposia Reports .......................................................... 14 Meetings of the Anthropology Section of the New York Academy of Sciences ....................................................................................... 18 Hunt Postdoctoral Fellows ................................................................... 19 Fejos Postdoctoral Fellows............................................................... ... 23 Wadsworth Fellows .............................................................................. 26 2018 Grantees Dissertation Fieldwork Grants ............................................................. 32 Post-Ph.D. Research Grants ................................................................ 41 Hunt Postdoctoral Fellowships ........................................................... 46 Fejos Postdoctal Fellowships
  • Quiz 4 - Anthropology in Practice

    Quiz 4 - Anthropology in Practice

    Quiz 4 - Anthropology in Practice 1. T/F It is rare for anthropologists to work outside of academia. False 2. T/F Anthropologists are most often involved in gathering information rather than constructing policy or initiating action. True 3. What is an example of a culturally appropriate innovation? Something that is aligned with a cultures beliefs and practices. Wash basins in a circle. 4. Are there products you miss that have been replaced by products you don’t care for? (re: over-innovation) 5. Name five examples of ways anthropologists work in the world outside of academia. Cultural Resource Management (archeology enable native peoples to protect and preserve their artifacts ) , Medical Practitioners, Forensic Anthropology (crimes scene), Advocate Anthropologist, Market Research (focus groups, observation of cultural behaviors related products and purchasing) 6. T/F Applied anthropology is a new area for American anthropologists. False (re: WWII Chrysanthemum and the Sword) 7. T/F Today there are applied anthropologists whose clients are neither poor nor powerless. True 8. What does CRM stand for? Cultural Resource Management 9. T/F There are corporations who hired CRMs to establish that a site does not contain objects of cultural and historical value. True 10. What are roles that applied anthropologists might assume? a. Protecting local people from policies and projects that might hurt them b. Interpreting local needs to larger/governing agencies c. Designing culturally appropriate and socially sensitive change d. Mediating between tribal and corporate interests e. Assisting local youth in opening Facebook and Twitter accounts ABCD 11. What might be the negative consequences of introducing irrigation into an arid region? Water-borne diseases…mosquitos 12.
  • SECTION NEWS February 2011 |

    SECTION NEWS February 2011 |

    SECTION NEWS February 2011 | Anthropology and Environment Section S ECTION NEWS Terre Satterfield, Contributing Editor Recognizing that the association’s sections represent the rich diversity of the discipline’s subfields, AN includes Section News, State of the Section Report which provides news of specific relevance to members of each section (eg, summaries of section business meetings, section meeting presentations, section awards). Members are encouraged to make full use of other AN editorial sections to report items By Paige West (A&E President) of more general interest (eg, meeting dates, death notices, commentaries). Contact information for section contributing editors A&E had a great 2010 meeting in New Orleans. Many is available in individual columns and on the AAA website. of our sponsored panels took up questions of circula- tion, flow and movement, the overall theme of the meet- in the Cane (1960) examined the connections of local ings. We sponsored panels on the circulation of ecoto- American Ethnological histories to global processes of capitalism. Moreover, pian imaginaries, water, energy, environmental knowledge Society Oscar Lewis’ La Vida (1966) inaugurated the culture and morals, climate science and knowledge, and conser- of poverty literature. Steward et al’s and Lewis’ studies vation capital. We also sponsored panels on hybrid land- Caitrin Lynch, Contributing Editor received intense anti-imperialist critiques from Puerto scapes, the relationship between environmental toxins Rican anthropologists (Valdés-Pizzini 2001). and neoliberal policy, the anthropological analysis of light, Join Us in Puerto Rico! Spring 2011 AES/ The anthropology of Puerto Rico has expanded consid- how transnational extractive industries work, contem- SUNTA Conference erably since the 1970s.
  • What Is Anthropology?

    What Is Anthropology?

    Chapter 1 What Is Anthropology? nthropology is the scientific study of the origin, the behaviour, and the A physical, social, and cultural development of humans. Anthropologists seek to understand what makes us human by studying human ancestors through archaeological excavation and by observing living cultures throughout the world. In this chapter, you will learn about different fields of anthropology and the major schools of thought, important theories, perspectives, and research within anthropology, as well as the work of influential anthropologists. You’ll also learn methods for conducting anthropological research and learn how to formulate your own research questions and record information. Chapter Expectations By the end of this chapter, you will: • summarize and compare major theories, perspectives, and research methods in anthropology • identify the significant contributions of influential anthropologists • outline the key ideas of the major anthropological schools of thought, and explain how they can be used to analyze features of cultural systems Fields of Anthropology • explain significant issues in different areas of anthropology Primatology Dian Fossey (1932–1985) • explain the main research methods for conducting anthropological Physical Anthropology Archaeology Cultural Anthropology research Biruté Galdikas (1946–) Jane Goodall (1934–) Sue Savage-Rumbaugh (1946–) Archaeology Forensic Human Variation Ethnology Linguistic Anthropology Key Terms Prehistoric Anthropology Charles Darwin Ruth Benedict (1887–1948) Noam Chomsky
  • Anthropology and the Racial Politics of Culture

    Anthropology and the Racial Politics of Culture

    ANTHROPOLOGY AND THE RACIAL POLITICS OF CULTURE Lee D. Baker Anthropology and the Racial Politics of Culture Duke University Press Durham and London ( 2010 ) © 2010 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ∞ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Warnock with Magma Compact display by Achorn International, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Dedicated to WILLIAM A. LITTLE AND SABRINA L. THOMAS Contents Preface: Questions ix Acknowledgments xiii Introduction 1 (1) Research, Reform, and Racial Uplift 33 (2) Fabricating the Authentic and the Politics of the Real 66 (3) Race, Relevance, and Daniel G. Brinton’s Ill-Fated Bid for Prominence 117 (4) The Cult of Franz Boas and His “Conspiracy” to Destroy the White Race 156 Notes 221 Works Cited 235 Index 265 Preface Questions “Are you a hegro? I a hegro too. Are you a hegro?” My mother loves to recount the story of how, as a three year old, I used this innocent, mis­ pronounced question to interrogate the garbagemen as I furiously raced my Big Wheel up and down the driveway of our rather large house on Park Avenue, a beautiful tree-lined street in an all-white neighborhood in Yakima, Washington. It was 1969. The Vietnam War was raging in South- east Asia, and the brutal murders of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr., Medgar Evers, and Bobby and John F. Kennedy hung like a pall over a nation coming to grips with new formulations, relations, and understand- ings of race, culture, and power.
  • Applications of Anthropology

    Applications of Anthropology

    Applications of Anthropology Meaning of applied, action and development anthropology Dr. Suninder Kaur HIG 914, Phase 2,Mohali, Chandigarh-160055 CONTENTS Anthropology and applied anthropology Career-oriented approach: the use of anthropology in policy research and implementation The spread of applied anthropology Role of Indian anthropologists in the Indian census Globalisation Participatory planning and information gathering: stepping stones to development Role of anthropologists in issues of health and gender studies Retreat from classical methodology : emergence of action anthropology Collaboration, parternership and multi-disciplinary action Postmodern perspective: research agenda Essence of applied anthropology : micro-level studies Non-governmental organizations (NGOS) Anthropology and development Development anthropology Social engineering model Socio-cultural compatibility Social analysis Anthropology and action Applications of applied anthropology HIV/AIDS epidemic Socio-Cultural Practices affecting HIV/AIDS Sustainable Development Gender and Health Reproductive Health RCH, STD and HIV Anthropology and Education Computer and Internet Anthropology in the computers era Anthropology and applied anthropology Applied Anthropology refers to the application of anthropological data, perspectives, theory, and methods to identify, assess, and solve social problems. Anthropology, the scientific study of mankind, has two major bifurcations namely Social and Physical Anthropology. Anthropology 1 deals with the classification and analysis of humans and their society: descriptively, culturally, historically, and physically. Its unique contribution to studying the bonds of human social relations has been the distinctive concept of culture. Physical Anthropology focuses on the evolutionary trends of Homo Sapiens, their classification (human paleontology) and the study of race and of body build and body constitution. It uses the techniques of anthropometry, as well as those of genetics, physiology, and ecology.