DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report Gazprombank Group ANNUAL REPORT (IFRS) 2006 GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 CONTENTS ADDRESS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD . 4 A PORTRAIT OF GAZPROMBANK GROUP. 6 1. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND PROSPECTS . 16 Macroeconomic situation and banking environment . 17 Financial performance . 19 Enhancement of shareholder base . 22 2. BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT . 26 Corporate business. 27 Strategic partnership with OAO “Gazprom” . 27 Cooperation development with strategic customers . 28 Corporate lending. 29 Cash and settlement services . 30 Investment banking . 31 Project finance . 31 Corporate finance. 32 Financial and stock markets. 38 Proprietary trading. 38 Client trading in financial markets . 39 Capital markets . 40 Asset management. 41 Custodian services . 42 Retail business . 46 Lending programs . 46 Deposits and money transfer services. 47 On-line and remote banking . 48 Retail business outlook . 50 3. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT. 54 Corporate governance development . 55 Risk management and internal audit . 56 |2| GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 Human resource policy and personnel management. 57 Regional expansion and it development. 58 Social responsibility . 59 4. GAZPROMBANK GROUP FINANCIAL INFORMATION . 64 Independent auditors’ report. 65 Consolidated financial statements . 66 REFERENCE INFORMATION . 140 Branches and representative offices . 141 Subsidiary banks . 144 S Licenses, permits, certificates. 145 T N Contact details . 146 E T N O C |3| GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 ADDRESS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Dear Shareholders, Clients, and Partners, We are delighted to report a steady progress and strong financial performance in the past year. We have achieved a significant growth in all key financials and expanded the Bank’s geography and the range of its products and services. In 2006, the Group’s assets grew 75% to exceed USD 31.6 billion, while customer accounts increased 1.6 times. The Bank’s corporate customer base reached 40 thousand. Our corporate loan portfolio grew 44% and our retail loan portfolio 2.7 times. The Group reported a net profit of USD 1.56 billion, or 2.8 times year on year. Gazprombank has reaffirmed its position as one of the top three Russian banks and improved its international standing. A high level of trust is reflected in investment grade credit ratings assigned to the Bank by the leading rating agencies Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s. The Bank’s sustainable growth is supported by a solid customer base that is centered around major government-owned and private companies. ОАО “Gazprom” has tradi- tionally been our top-priority client, and the Bank considers the support of Gazprom’s operations and participation in its large-scale investment projects to be a very impor- tant and prestigious mission. We see it as our contribution to strengthening the ener- gy basis of the Russian economy and a vital mission for ensuring global energy secu- rity. In January 2007, Gazprombank and Gazprom signed a cooperation agreement for the period through 2015 providing for further development of our close partner- ship. The Bank’s solid and well-balanced funding base guarantees continued expansion of products and services offered to our corporate and retail clients. Gazprombank active- ly develops investment banking. Today the Bank is the leading underwriter and an organizer of domestic market bond issues. Its Depositary Center is the largest in Rus- sia in terms of customer assets. We have also strengthened our positions in the con- sumer and mortgage lending markets and the market of remote banking services. Furthermore, we are actively developing our asset management business. In 2006, Gazprombank completed an additional share issue, which became another important landmark for the Bank. The new issue boosted the Bank’s share capital by 28%, while the Group’s equity more than doubled to USD 6.65 billion. In addition to Gazprom the Bank acquired another major shareholder – the leading Russian Non-State Pension Fund “GAZFOND”. A new inflow of cash generated by an additional stock placement will be invested in the regional network development pro- gram, the retail and investment banking businesses and the introduction of new prod- ucts for corporate customers from various sectors of the economy. |4| ADDRESS BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD Gazprombank of theManagementBoar Chairman benefit ofthecountry. tothemutualsatisfactionofallparticipantsand ourrelationship and develop Please, beassur I totheirpractices. social responsibility ofcorporate inthearea financial institutionsinadaptinginternationalstandards toassistRussian ready all aspectsofthisinfluenceinourdailyoperationsandare toconsider strive andotherimportantaspectsofsociallife.We protection, ronmental andhealth,envi- impactonemployment,publicwelfare andhasadirect development fullyunderstandthatbusinessitselfisanimportantfactorofsocial we Moreover, e s t enterprisepursuingitsownbusinesspurposes.Yet, isacommercial Gazprombank G he Bank recognizes its commitment to fulfilling social responsibilities focusingon itscommitmentto fulfillingsocialresponsibilities he Bankrecognizes ponsorship and charity and providing support to orphanages and boarding schools, supporttoorphanagesandboarding ponsorship andcharityproviding ducational, research and cultural institutions, the church andsportsorganizations. andculturalinstitutions,thechurch ducational, research am grateful to our shareholders, clients andbusinesspartnersforcooperation. am gratefultoourshareholders, AZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report |2006 AZPROMBANK GROUP|Annualreport ed, that in the future theBankwilldo itsbesttofurtherstrengthen ed, thatinthefuture d Andrey I.Akimov Andrey |5| GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 A PORTRAIT OF GAZPROMBANK GROUP Joint-Stock Bank of the Gas Industry “Gazprombank” (Closed Joint-Stock Company) is one of the largest full-service financial institutions in Russia providing a broad range of banking, financial, and investment products to corporate and individual cus- tomers, credit institutions and institutional and private investors. I Gazprombank was founded in 1990 as a strategic partner of OAO “Gazprom” and the gas industry. I In late 2006, Gazprombank completed an additional placement of shares to increase its share capital by about 1/3, while its total equity more than doubled to reach USD 6.65 billion. I Gazprombank’s two principal shareholders are OAO “Gazprom”, the largest producer and exporter of natural gas in the world (41.7%) and NPF “Gazfond”, a leading Russian non-state pension fund (50% + 1 share, including the shares of ZAO “Leader”, a “Gazfond”'s asset management company). I The Bank provides services to companies representing key sectors of the Russ- ian economy, including natural gas, oil, nuclear energy, chemical and petro- chemical, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, power, engineering, transportation, construction, communications, agriculture, trade, and other industries. rd rd I Gazprombank is the 3 largest bank in Russia by key indices; the 3 largest banking institution in Central and Eastern Europe (2006); and the 137th largest bank in the world in terms of capital (2006). I Winner of The Bank of the Year 2001 and 2005 in Russia awards from The Banker. I Long-term ratings from the international rating agencies at the investment grade: I Moody’s Investors Service: I Foreign currency deposit rating – Baa2; I Debt rating – A3. I Standard & Poor’s: I Counterparty credit rating – BBB-; I Debt rating – BBB-. I Gazprombank’s customer base includes: I Individual customers – over 1.8 million; I Corporate customers – over 40,000. |6| GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 I The Bank’s extensive regional network comprises 35 branches, 4 subsidiary banks in Russia, and one affiliated bank in Belarus with a total of 450 offices offering banking services to customers in 55 regions of Russia and Belarus (as of 30 June 2007). I Gazprombank’s workforce is around 6,000. P REGIONAL NETWORK U O R G K N A B M O R P Z A G F O T I A R T R O P A Regions of presence of Gazprombank, its subsidiary and affiliated banks, and their units Gazprombank, its branches and supplementary offices Subsidiary and affiliated banks Cities where Gazprombank is planning to establish branch offices |7| GAZPROMBANK GROUP | Annual report | 2006 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE YEAR I Placement of additional 6.7 million shares at RUR 1,000 each, purchased by the new shareholder NPF “Gazfond” (December 2006). Issued share capital totaled 19,997,777 ordinary shares as of 31 December 2006. I Further development of partnership with OAO “Gazprom”: signing new coopera- tion agreement for the period through 2015 (January 2007); participation in the promotion of Gazprom stock (particularly as a custodian bank). I International ratings upgraded to an investment grade. I Expansion of regional network: new branches in Krasnoyarsk (January 2006), Irkutsk (July 2006), Kemerovo (February 2007) and Samara (March 2007); a rep- resentative office in Beijing (China). Acquisition of Credit Ural Bank (March 2007). I Active development of investment business: project and corporate finance, participation in major international projects initiated by Gazprom and other strategic clients of the Bank. I Successful European Commercial Papers (ECP) issue (February 2006) and two Ruble bond issues at RUR 5 billion each (February and November 2006); three- year USD 500 million syndicated loan (April 2006). I Leading organizer and underwriter of corporate bond
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies
    Baltic Rim Economies Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Poland - Baltic Russia Bimonthly Review ISSUE NO. 5, 31 OCTOBER 2008 ECONOMIC REVIEWS: ESTONIA Page 1 LATVIA Page 2 LITHUANIA Page 3 POLAND Page 4 ST. PETERSBURG Page 5 LENINGRAD REGION Page 6 KALININGRAD REGION Page 7 EXPERT ARTICLES: José Manuel Durão Barroso: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Page 8 Paula Lehtomäki : Cleaner, safer and brighter future of the Baltic Sea Page 9 Jaak Aaviksoo: Events in Georgia provoke discussions on security in good, old, peaceful Europe Page 10 Siiri Oviir: Gas pipeline to the Baltic Sea – should it come in a civilized way or under the dictate of the big and the powerful? Page 12 Artis Pabriks: Baltic security reflections in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian conflict Page 13 Efthimios E. Mitropoulos: Busy Baltic to benefit from global pollution measures Page 14 Jari Luoto: EU focuses on the Baltic Sea Page 15 André Mernier: A role for the Energy Charter in a new Russia-EU Partnership Agreement Page 16 Timo Rajala: Finland is facing major energy decisions Page 18 Karlis Mikelsons: Environmentally friendly for sustainable growth Page 19 Reinier Zwitserloot: Nord Stream – making more European energy solidarity possible Page 20 Viktoras Valentukevicius: Current and future activities of Lietuvos Dujos AB Page 21 Seppo Remes: Russian gas can unite Europe – if we allow it Page 22 Aleksandra Mierzyńska and Krzysztof Parkoła: PGNiG – trying to be one step further Page 24 Tapio Reponen: Profiling as a key success factor in modern university strategies Page 25 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • OOB of the Russian Fleet (Kommersant, 2008)
    The Entire Russian Fleet - Kommersant Moscow 21/03/08 09:18 $1 = 23.6781 RUR Moscow 28º F / -2º C €1 = 36.8739 RUR St.Petersburg 25º F / -4º C Search the Archives: >> Today is Mar. 21, 2008 11:14 AM (GMT +0300) Moscow Forum | Archive | Photo | Advertising | Subscribe | Search | PDA | RUS Politics Mar. 20, 2008 E-mail | Home The Entire Russian Fleet February 23rd is traditionally celebrated as the Soviet Army Day (now called the Homeland Defender’s Day), and few people remember that it is also the Day of Russia’s Navy. To compensate for this apparent injustice, Kommersant Vlast analytical weekly has compiled The Entire Russian Fleet directory. It is especially topical since even Russia’s Commander-in-Chief compared himself to a slave on the galleys a week ago. The directory lists all 238 battle ships and submarines of Russia’s Naval Fleet, with their board numbers, year of entering service, name and rank of their commanders. It also contains the data telling to which unit a ship or a submarine belongs. For first-class ships, there are schemes and tactic-technical characteristics. So detailed data on all Russian Navy vessels, from missile cruisers to base type trawlers, is for the first time compiled in one directory, making it unique in the range and amount of information it covers. The Entire Russian Fleet carries on the series of publications devoted to Russia’s armed forces. Vlast has already published similar directories about the Russian Army (#17-18 in 2002, #18 in 2003, and #7 in 2005) and Russia’s military bases (#19 in 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow Defense Brief Your Professional Guide Inside # 2, 2011
    Moscow Defense Brief Your Professional Guide Inside # 2, 2011 Troubled Waters CONTENTS Defense Industries #2 (24), 2011 Medium-term Prospects for MiG Corporation PUBLISHER After Interim MMRCA Competition Results 2 Centre for Russian Helicopter Industry: Up and Away 4 Analysis of Strategies and Technologies Arms Trade CAST Director & Publisher Exports of Russian Fighter Jets in 1999-2010 8 Ruslan Pukhov Editor-in-Chief Mikhail Barabanov International Relations Advisory Editors Georgian Lesson for Libya 13 Konstantin Makienko Alexey Pokolyavin Researchers Global Security Ruslan Aliev Polina Temerina Missile Defense: Old Problem, No New Solution 15 Dmitry Vasiliev Editorial Office Armed Forces 3 Tverskaya-Yamskaya, 24, office 5, Moscow, Russia 125047 Reform of the Russian Navy in 2008-2011 18 phone: +7 499 251 9069 fax: +7 495 775 0418 http://www.mdb.cast.ru/ Facts & Figures To subscribe, contact Incidents Involving Russian Submarines in 1992-2010 23 phone: +7 499 251 9069 or e-mail: [email protected] 28 Moscow Defense Brief is published by the Centre for Analysis of Strategies Our Authors and Technologies All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording or otherwise, without reference to Moscow Defense Brief. Please note that, while the Publisher has taken all reasonable care in the compilation of this publication, the Publisher cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this publication or for any loss arising therefrom. Authors’ opinions do not necessary reflect those of the Publisher or Editor Translated by: Ivan Khokhotva Computer design & pre-press: B2B design bureau Zebra www.zebra-group.ru Cover Photo: K-433 Svyatoy Georgiy Pobedonosets (Project 667BDR) nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine at the Russian Pacific Fleet base in Vilyuchinsk, February 25, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Rearmament Programme
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7877, 24 January 2017 Russia's rearmament By Claire Mills programme Contents: 1. Background 2. Russian defence expenditure since 2001 3. Programme of military modernisation 4. Progress against the State Armament Plan 5. Looking forward – the State Armament Plan 2018-2025 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Russia's rearmament programme Contents Summary 4 1. Background 9 1.1 Brief outline of current military assets 10 2. Russian defence expenditure since 2001 13 2.1 Spending in 2016 15 3. Programme of military modernisation 16 3.1 State Armament Plan 2007-2015 17 3.2 2008 programme of military reform 18 3.3 State Armament Plan 2011-2020 21 4. Progress against the State Armament Plan 23 4.1 Complicating issues 24 The impact of defence inflation 24 The military-industrial complex 25 4.2 How far has rearmament progressed? 28 Nuclear forces 28 Revitalisation of the Navy 31 Modernisation of the Aerospace Force 34 Ground forces 37 5. Looking forward – the State Armament Plan 2018-2025 40 5.1 Projected spending 40 5.2 Expectations for the next SAP 40 3 Commons Library Briefing, 24 January 2017 Cover page image copyright: Moscow military parade 2015 by Kremlin.ru. Licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 international license / image cropped. 4 Russia's rearmament programme Summary The decline of the Russian military during the 1990s was regarded as a natural consequence of the fall of the Soviet Union, a crippled Russian economy and a political leadership searching for identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiral Gorshkov Frigate Reveals Serious Shortcomings in Russia’S Naval Modernization Program
    March 2016 Admiral Gorshkov Frigate Reveals Serious Shortcomings in Russia’s Naval Modernization Program Paul Schwartz Since 2008, as part of its ongoing military reform, Moscow has embarked on a large-scale program of naval expansion intended to recapitalize its ailing shipbuilding industry and rebuild and modernize its fleet. Rebuilding the fleet has received especially high priority in Russia’s 2011–2020 State-Armament Program, with the navy set to receive nearly 5 trillion rubles (about US$70 billion), or fully one-quarter of the total amount to be spent on military modernization of Russia’s entire armed forces through 2020.1 Russia’s fleet development plans were further elaborated in its “Action Plan 2013–2020,” an overall modernization road map released by the Ministry of Defense in 2013. According to this plan, the percentage of modern equipment in Russia’s navy was set to increase from a level of approximately 40 percent in 2013 to over 70 percent by 2020.2 Despite substantial efforts to make good on its naval modernization plans, including significant state spending, what has been delivered thus far to the Russian Navy has fallen well short of expectations. While official Russian rhetoric routinely proclaims that the fleet is undergoing a major renaissance, in reality Russia’s shipbuilding programs have been severely hampered by enduring problems, including budget shortfalls, underinvestment in naval R&D, poor design, obsolescence in its shipbuilding industry, system- integration challenges, reduced access to foreign technology, and widespread corruption, among other problems, all of which have led to long-standing delays in several naval programs and outright cancellation of others.3 The Admiral Gorshkov–Class Frigate A particularly important case in point is the seemingly endless project to build a new blue-water frigate.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in St. Petersburg St
    Doing business in St. Petersburg St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development – member of Enterprise Europe Network | www.doingbusiness.ru 1 Doing business in St. Petersburg Guide for exporters, investors and start-ups The current publication was developed by and under supervision of Enterprise Europe Network - Russia, Gate2Rubin Consortium, Regional Center - St. Petersburg operated by St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development with the assistance of the relevant legal, human resources, certification, research and real estate firms. © 2014 Enterprise Europe Network - Russia, Gate2Rubin Consortium, Regional Center – St. Petersburg operated by St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development. All rights reserved. International copyright. Any use of materials of this publication is possible only after written agreement of St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development and relevant contributing firms. Doing business in St. Petersburg. – Spb.: Politekhnika-servis, 2014. – 167 p. ISBN 978-5-906555-22-9 Online version available at www.doingbusiness.ru. Doing business in St. Petersburg 2 St. Petersburg Foundation for SME Development – member of Enterprise Europe Network | www.doingbusiness.ru Table of contents 1. The city ....................................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Geography ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.2. Public holidays and business hours ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ¹3(19) 2006 ¹3(19) 2006
    ¹3(19) 2006 ¹3(19) 2006 ÍÀÓ×ÍÎ-ÒÅÕÍÈ×ÅÑÊÈÉ È ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÎÍÍÎ-ÀÍÀËÈÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÉ ÆÓÐÍÀË ÐÅÄÀÊÖÈÎÍÍÛÉ ÑÎÂÅÒ Ñîïðåäñåäàòåëè: ÑÎÄÅÐÆÀÍÈÅ Â.Ë. Àëåêñàíäðîâ, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð ÔÃÓÏ «Àäìèðàëòåéñêèå âåðôè», ïðåçèäåíò ÖÏ ÍÒÎ ñóäîñòðîèòåëåé ÑÓÄÎÑÒÐÎÅÍÈÅ èì. àêàä. À.Í. Êðûëîâà Ê.Ï. Áîðèñåíêî, ðåêòîð ÑÏáÃÌÒÓ Ê 50-ëåòèþ À.Ñ. Áóçàêîâà ........................................................ 8 ×ëåíû ñîâåòà: Ñ.Ï. Àëåêñååâ, íà÷àëüíèê À.Ñ. Áóçàêîâ. Îïûò ñòðîèòåëüñòâà êîðâåòîâ ÃÍÈÍÃÈ ÌÎ ÐÔ íà ÎÀÎ «Ñóäîñòðîèòåëüíûé çàâîä «Ñåâåðíàÿ âåðôü» ................. 8 À.Ñ. Áóçàêîâ, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð ÎÀÎ ÑÇ «Ñåâåðíàÿ âåðôü» ÎÀÎ ÑÔ «Àëìàç» Ðîññèè è Ñàíêò-Ïåòåðáóðãó ...................... 13 Ë.Ã. Ãðàáîâåö, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð ÎÀÎ ÑÔ «Àëìàç» Ò.Ä. Õóçèÿòîâ. Ìèðîâîé êîíòåéíåðíûé ôëîò: Quo Vadis? .... 15 Â.Â. Äóäàðåíêî, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð ÎÀÎ «Ñóäïðîìêîìïëåêò» Î.Ì. Æóðàâëåâ. Êîíñòðóêòèâíûå îñîáåííîñòè Â.Í. Êèðååâ, íà÷àëüíèê-ãëàâíûé ñóäîâ-ëåñîâîçîâ, ïðèñïîñîáëåííûõ äëÿ ïåðåâîçêè ïàêåòèðîâàííûõ êîíñòðóêòîð ÖÊÁ «Áàëòñóäîïðîåêò» Ë.Ì. Êëÿ÷êî, äèðåêòîð ïèëîìàòåðèàëîâ ....................................................................... 19 ÎÀÎ ÖÍÈÈ «Êóðñ» À.Ì. ×óëêîâ. Èññëåäîâàíèå ïðîåêòíûõ è ïðîìûñëîâûõ Ý.À. Êîíîâ, äèðåêòîð ÎÎÎ Èçäàòåëüñòâî «Ìîð Âåñò» õàðàêòåðèñòèê òðàóëåðîâ-ðûáîçàâîäîâ..................................... 26 Ë.Ã. Êóçíåöîâ, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð Ñ.Í. Êëèìàøåâñêèé, À.Â. Ñèëèí. Áåñêîíòàêòíûé ÎÀÎ «Êîìïðåññîð» À.Ï. Ìàòëàõ, ãåíåðàëüíûé äèðåêòîð òðàíñïîðò Àðêòèêè ................................................................. 31 ÎÎÎ ÍÏÎ «Ïîëÿðíàÿ çâåçäà» Í.Â. Îðëîâ,
    [Show full text]
  • Passport of St. Petersburg
    Passport of St. Petersburg Saint Petersburg (St. Petersburg) is situated at the easternmost tip of the Gulf of Finland of the Baltic Sea. The exact geographical coordinates of the city centre are 59°57' North Latitude 30°19' East Longitude. St. Petersburg, located in the node of several major sea, river and land transportation routes, is the European gate of Russia and its strategic centre closest to the border with the European Union. Inland waters constitute about 10% of the city territory. The total area (with administrative subjects) covers 1439 km². The population amounts to 5 225.7 people (as of January 1, 2016 by the data from the federal statistical agency “Petrostat”). St. Petersburg is the second (after Moscow) largest city of the Russian Federation and the third (after Moscow and London) largest city in Europe. St. Petersburg is the administrative centre of the Northwestern Federal Region which is characterized by considerable potential in natural resources, well developed industry, a fine traffic network and furthermore provides contact of the Russian Federation with the outside world via the sea ports of the Baltic Sea and the Arctic Ocean. The city hosts the following institutions: • The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; • Regional offices of federal ministries and departments; • Representations of 24 entities and 2 cities in the Russian Federation; • 65 consular offices of foreign countries; • Offices of international organizations: CIS Inter-Parliamentary Assembly, Inter-Parliamentary Assembly of the Eurasian Economic Community, representatives of international organizations, funds and associations, UN agencies and representative offices and branches of international banks. • Offices of international cultural institutions: the Goethe German Cultural Center, the French Institute, the Finnish Institute, the Dutch Institute, the Danish Cultural Institute, the Israeli Cultural Center and the Italian Cultural Institute.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Defense Industry and Arms Trade: Facts and Figures Prepared by the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies
    Russian defense industry and arms trade: facts and figures prepared by the Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies Contents 1. Russian arms exports 2. Russian defense budget and procurement 3. Key current contracts for Russian arms exports 4. Ranking of the top Russian defense companies More detailed information can be found in the Eksport Vooruzheniy or Moscow Defense Brief journals published by CAST. For subscription, please visit http://cast.ru/eng/. 1. Russian arms exports The key indicators used to quantify Russian arms exports include: • value of deliveries made over the reported year (i.e. the worth of the arms and military equipment already delivered); • revenue (money received under arms contracts); • accumulated value of arms contracts signed during the year; and • accumulated portfolio of contracts by the year's end. The headline figure for arms exports is usually the value of deliveries made. But in any event, a distinction must be made between the four key indicators listed above, as they are sometimes confused by journalists, who unwittingly misinterpret the source figures and draw the wrong conclusions. Starting from 2007, Rosoboronexport, a state-owned company, has been the only Russian entity that holds the full license to export arms and military equipment. Previously, similar licenses were also held by RSK MiG aircraft corporation (Moscow), KBP instrument design bureau (Tula), KBM machine-building design bureau (Kolomna, Moscow region) and NPOmash research and production company (Reutov, Moscow region). Now defense companies (only 22 of them) can export only spare parts and components for weapons systems exported via Rosoboronexport. It is therefore useful to make a distinction between: • total Russian arms exports; • exports via Rosoboronexport (ROE); and • exports of independent spare parts suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Grigori Dudarev, Hannu Hernesniemi, Pavel Filippov EMERGING
    Sarja B 192 Series ______________________________________________________ Grigori Dudarev, Hannu Hernesniemi, Pavel Filippov EMERGING CLUSTERS OF THE NORTHERN DIMENSION Competitive Analysis of Northwest Russia – A Preliminary Study ETLA, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy Publisher: Taloustieto Oy Helsinki 2002 Cover: Mainos MayDay, Vantaa 2002 ISBN 951-628-373-X ISSN 0356-7443 Printed in: Yliopistopaino, Helsinki 2002 DUDAREV, Grigori – HERNESNIEMI, Hannu – FILIPPOV, Pavel, EMERG- ING CLUSTERS OF THE NORTHERN DIMENSION; Competitive Analysis of Northwest Russia, Helsinki: ETLA, Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, 2002, 174 p. (B, ISSN 0356-7443; No. 192). ISBN 951-628-373-X. ABSTRACT: The study presents the initial results of research into the competitiveness and prospects for further growth of the industries of Northwest Russia. It also high- lights the opportunities for over-the-border cooperation between Finnish and Russian companies. The structure and main features of seven key sectors of the Northwest Rus- sia were examined. The forestry, base metals, energy, food and ICT sectors were stud- ied using a method of cluster analysis. The study demonstrates that all the necessary elements for the formation of internationally competitive clusters are found in these sectors. The transport and logistics sector to a great extent determines the cost level and even competitiveness of local manufacturers. The construction materials industry bene- fits from natural resources, but it is fragmented
    [Show full text]