DOCSLIB.ORG

Market Overview of the Modernisation of Asian Navies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Market Overview of the Modernisation of Asian Navies Market Overview of the Modernisation of Asian Navies Global Military Naval Vessels and Support in Service Amartya De, Senior Consultant Aerospace & Defense Practice, Asia Pacific 1 Market Overview - Key Questions What is the potential for military naval vessels and SIS market despite budget constraints witnessed globally? Which segments have the highest growth potential and why? Which are the countries providing the highest growth opportunities to the market and what will be the future scope in these countries? Source: Frost & Sullivan 2 Executive Summary Global Military Naval Vessels Market Market Size at Compound Market Revenue End of Forecast Annual Growth Period Rate $32.00 B $39.99 B 2.5% (2013) (2022) (2013–2022) Global Support in Service Market Market Size at Compound Market Revenue End of Forecast Annual Growth Period Rate $15.29 B $21.24 B 3.7% (2013) (2022) (2013–2022) Decreasing Stable Increasing Source: Frost & Sullivan 3 Market Overview - Segmentation Market Global Military Naval Vessels and SIS Market Central Middle Latin North Regions Africa APAC Europe Asia East America America Supercarriers Light Aircraft Carriers Amphibious Vessels Cruisers Destroyers Frigates Corvettes Platforms Ballistic Nuclear-powered Attack Conventional Submarines Missile Submarines (SSBN) Submarines (SSN) (SSK) Logistics and Support Mine Warfare Patrol and Costal Vessels Vessels Line Maintenance Heavy Maintenance Services Spare Parts Modernisation Training Source: Frost & Sullivan 4 Market Overview - Segmentation by Platform Role and SIS Activity Key Takeaway: The market shares of frigate, nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine (SSBN), and heavy maintenance segments will see the highest growth by 2022. Forecast for Global Military Naval Vessels Forecast for Global Military SIS Market: 2022 Market: 2022 Amphibious Vessel Line Training 3.1% Maintenance Super Carrier 7.0% Corvette 4.6% 10.9% 4.5% Nuclear- Destroyer Powered 11.5% Heavy Attack Maintenance Submarine 33.2% (SSN) Modernisation 17.5% 31.6% Frigate 19.1% Conventional Submarine Light Aircraft (SSK) Carrier 9.8% 3.7% Nuclear- Logistics and Powered Support Vessel Patrol and Mine Warfare Ballistic Missile 3.5% Spare Parts Coastal 2.3% Submarine Vessel 23.6% (SSBN) 3.2% 10.9% 5 Drivers and Restraints Total Military Naval Vessels and SIS Market: Key Market Drivers and Restraints, Global, 2014–2022 1–2 Years 3–5 Years 6–9 Years Implementation of extensive re-armament programs in APAC and the Middle East countries results in increase in demand for modern military vessels. The growing market of second-hand defence platforms offers an opportunity to naval platform suppliers. Market Drivers Increasing number of piracy and terrorism acts boosts demand for patrol and coastal vessels and private convoys services. Demand for local partnerships and technology transfer to provide new military vessels and SIS of complex naval platforms make market penetration difficult. Emerging regional participants particularly in APAC are increasing competition on the military naval vessels and SIS market. Defence budget cuts cause significant pressure on Market Restraints procurement of naval vessels and related SIS programmes. Impact: High Medium Low Source: Frost & Sullivan 6 Military Naval Vessels Market - Revenue Forecast by Region Key Takeaway: The high jump of revenue in APAC after 2015 will be due to expected introduction of light aircraft carriers into service by China and India. Military Naval Vessels Market: 2013–2022 20.0 Fastest growing regions 18.0 16.0 14.0 2nd biggest region after North America 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 Revenue( in $US billion) Fastest growth in Central Asia expected from Russian Navy 4.0 2.0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Asia-Pacific 7.37 8.60 8.78 10.71 9.73 10.60 9.43 9.76 9.14 9.32 Central Asia 4.36 4.44 4.52 5.26 5.38 5.51 5.65 5.88 6.03 6.18 Latin America 1.28 1.30 1.32 1.36 1.38 1.40 1.86 1.91 1.93 1.52 The Middle East 0.80 0.81 0.83 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.99 1.01 1.03 Source: Frost & Sullivan 7 Military Naval Vessels Market - Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market Key Takeaway: The frigate segment will generate the highest cumulative revenue during the forecast period. Global Military Naval Vessels Market: Forecast by Vertical Market, 2013–2022 25.0 TOP 3 Segments 20.0 15.0 Revenue( in $US billion) 10.0 Frigate ($US 66.9 billion) 5.0 Nuclear Submarine SSN($US 65.4 billion) 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Destroyer 3.93 3.98 4.02 4.22 4.27 5.11 5.17 5.27 4.54 4.61 Frigate 5.83 5.97 6.11 6.42 6.59 6.76 6.95 7.22 7.43 7.64 SSN 5.80 5.91 6.02 6.25 6.36 6.48 7.04 7.19 7.32 7.01 Source: Frost & Sullivan 8 SIS Market—Percent Revenue Forecast by Region Key Takeaway: APAC is a prominent region for SIS standing at 3 rd place globally after NA and EU. Global SIS Market: Revenue Forecast by Region, 2013–2022 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 Asia Pacific ($US 32.5 billion expenditure in SIS) Revenue( in $US billion) 2.0 1.0 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Asia-Pacific 2.70 2.84 2.85 3.12 3.13 3.15 3.16 3.84 3.86 3.88 Central Asia 1.15 1.19 1.20 1.44 1.46 1.48 1.51 1.54 1.57 1.59 The Middle East 0.19 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.27 0.27 Source: Frost & Sullivan 9 SIS Market - Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market Key Takeaway: The heavy maintenance segment will generate the highest revenue during the forecast period. SIS Market: Percent Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market, Global, 2013–2022 25.0 20.0 15.0 Heavy Maintenance 10.0 Spare Parts 5.0 Revenue( in $US billion) Mordernisation 0.0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Line Maintenance 0.84 0.85 0.86 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.97 0.98 0.99 Heavy Maintenance 4.20 4.23 4.26 6.13 6.18 6.24 6.29 6.91 6.97 7.04 Spare Parts 4.40 4.44 4.47 4.58 4.62 4.66 4.71 4.91 4.96 5.01 Modernisation 4.88 5.10 5.14 5.22 5.27 5.32 5.38 6.57 6.64 6.71 Training 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.30 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.46 1.48 1.49 Note: All figures are rounded. The base year is 2013. Source: Frost & Sullivan 10 Competitive Analysis Total Military Naval Vessels and SIS Market: Competitive Landscape and Key Participants Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Northrop Grunmann, General Dynamics Marine Systems, Tier I DCNS, BAE Systems, CMN, TKMS, Lürssen, Navantia, Damen Shipyards Group, Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Heavy Industries, CSOI, CSSC, CSIC, Mazagon Docks Limited, Hindustan Shipyard Limited, United Shipbuilding Corporation, Sevmash, Admiralty Shipyard, Baltiysky Zavod, Severnaya Verf, Baltic Shipyard,Parokhodniy Shipyard, Sredne-Nevskiy Shipyard, Abu Dhabi Ship Building Tier II Rockwell Collins, Hispano-Suiza, Rolls Royce, CAE, Safran, SMA Engine Snecma, VIJA, Raytheon, Selex, Kongsberg, ST Engineering, Saab, Elbit Systems, Indra, Rubin Design Bureau, NPO Mashinostroyeniya, Samsung Heavy Industries, BMZ, KTZ and Zvezda, MAN Diesel & Turbo SE (a subgroup of MAN SE), Wärtsilä, MAK, Caterpillar, Deutz, MTU, Saab AB, QinetiQ, Thales, MBDA, Boeing, ATLAS ELEKTRONIK, BMT Defence Services, Thales Tier III Local suppliers Source: Frost & Sullivan 11 APAC Breakdown 12 APAC Military Naval Vessels Market - Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market Key Takeaway: Military vessels fleet modernisation will drive APAC’s expenditure on military naval vessels. The frigate and conventional submarine (SSK(SSK)) have maximum interest in APAC. Military Naval Vessels Market: Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market, APAC, 2013–2022 8.00 7.00 6.00 Destroyer 5.00 Revenue($ Billion) 4.00 Frigate 3.00 2.00 SSK (Conventional submarine) 1.00 0.00 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Destroyer 1.41 1.42 1.43 1.55 1.57 2.37 2.39 2.44 1.67 1.69 Frigate 1.76 1.78 1.80 1.94 1.96 1.99 2.02 2.08 2.11 2.15 SSK 1.56 1.60 1.69 1.84 1.88 1.86 1.91 1.99 2.04 2.09 SSBN 0.42 0.44 0.45 0.51 0.53 0.55 0.57 0.60 0.63 0.65 SSN 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.33 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 Source: Frost & Sullivan 13 APAC SIS Market—Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market Key Takeaway: The complexity of newly procured vessvesselsels and extensive modernisation programmes will result in high growth of the SIS market in APAC. SIS Market: Revenue Forecast by Vertical Market, APAC, 2013–2022 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 Heavy Maintenance 2.00 1.50 Spare Parts Revenue($ Billion) 1.00 0.50 Mordernisation 0.00 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Line Maintenance 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18 0.18 Heavy Maintenance 0.86 0.86 0.86 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.21 1.55 1.56 1.57 Spare Parts 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.95 0.95 0.96 Modernisation 0.75 0.88 0.88 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.92 Training 0.17 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 0.26 0.26 Year Note: All figures are rounded.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies
    Baltic Rim Economies Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Poland - Baltic Russia Bimonthly Review ISSUE NO. 5, 31 OCTOBER 2008 ECONOMIC REVIEWS: ESTONIA Page 1 LATVIA Page 2 LITHUANIA Page 3 POLAND Page 4 ST. PETERSBURG Page 5 LENINGRAD REGION Page 6 KALININGRAD REGION Page 7 EXPERT ARTICLES: José Manuel Durão Barroso: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Page 8 Paula Lehtomäki : Cleaner, safer and brighter future of the Baltic Sea Page 9 Jaak Aaviksoo: Events in Georgia provoke discussions on security in good, old, peaceful Europe Page 10 Siiri Oviir: Gas pipeline to the Baltic Sea – should it come in a civilized way or under the dictate of the big and the powerful? Page 12 Artis Pabriks: Baltic security reflections in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian conflict Page 13 Efthimios E. Mitropoulos: Busy Baltic to benefit from global pollution measures Page 14 Jari Luoto: EU focuses on the Baltic Sea Page 15 André Mernier: A role for the Energy Charter in a new Russia-EU Partnership Agreement Page 16 Timo Rajala: Finland is facing major energy decisions Page 18 Karlis Mikelsons: Environmentally friendly for sustainable growth Page 19 Reinier Zwitserloot: Nord Stream – making more European energy solidarity possible Page 20 Viktoras Valentukevicius: Current and future activities of Lietuvos Dujos AB Page 21 Seppo Remes: Russian gas can unite Europe – if we allow it Page 22 Aleksandra Mierzyńska and Krzysztof Parkoła: PGNiG – trying to be one step further Page 24 Tapio Reponen: Profiling as a key success factor in modern university strategies Page 25 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • OOB of the Russian Fleet (Kommersant, 2008)
    The Entire Russian Fleet - Kommersant Moscow 21/03/08 09:18 $1 = 23.6781 RUR Moscow 28º F / -2º C €1 = 36.8739 RUR St.Petersburg 25º F / -4º C Search the Archives: >> Today is Mar. 21, 2008 11:14 AM (GMT +0300) Moscow Forum | Archive | Photo | Advertising | Subscribe | Search | PDA | RUS Politics Mar. 20, 2008 E-mail | Home The Entire Russian Fleet February 23rd is traditionally celebrated as the Soviet Army Day (now called the Homeland Defender’s Day), and few people remember that it is also the Day of Russia’s Navy. To compensate for this apparent injustice, Kommersant Vlast analytical weekly has compiled The Entire Russian Fleet directory. It is especially topical since even Russia’s Commander-in-Chief compared himself to a slave on the galleys a week ago. The directory lists all 238 battle ships and submarines of Russia’s Naval Fleet, with their board numbers, year of entering service, name and rank of their commanders. It also contains the data telling to which unit a ship or a submarine belongs. For first-class ships, there are schemes and tactic-technical characteristics. So detailed data on all Russian Navy vessels, from missile cruisers to base type trawlers, is for the first time compiled in one directory, making it unique in the range and amount of information it covers. The Entire Russian Fleet carries on the series of publications devoted to Russia’s armed forces. Vlast has already published similar directories about the Russian Army (#17-18 in 2002, #18 in 2003, and #7 in 2005) and Russia’s military bases (#19 in 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • SBX Sourcebook, Volume II
    An SBX Sourcebook, Volume II Version of 2012-05-13 Additional information for this sourcebook would be welcome. Please send it to [email protected] SBX ballasted down in stable “semi-submerged” operating position SBX-1 fully afloat and under way http://www.indeed.com/salary/q-Shift-Security-Lead-Sbx-l-Adak,-AK.html http://marinetraffic.com/ais/ Accessed 2012-05-11T14:32Z http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/documents/nas_response.pdf April 30, 2012 Representative Michael R. Turner Chairman, Strategic Forces Subcommittee House Armed Services Committee Representative Loretta Sanchez Ranking Member House Armed Services Committee Dear Mr. Turner and Ms. Sanchez: We are pleased to provide the following responses to the twelve (12) questions you raised to us in your April 20 letter. Before doing so, however, it is appropriate to make clear that our responses are unclassified as you requested (i.e., some specific details have been omitted to avoid making this letter classified). Furthermore, our responses are based on the briefing we provided to your subcommittee on April 18, as well as the work of a National Research Council (NRC) committee1 which we co-chaired and helped prepare the NRC report entitled Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives which is undergoing final security classification review by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is also appropriate to make clear that the committee examined ballistic missile defense (BMD) for the following limited missions for defense against attacks that could plausibly be mounted by “rogue states” in the next decade or so: (1) protection of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Summary
    Contact Expert Group – Project Summary Project Title UK7 Dismantling of two Oscar 1 Class nuclear submarines General Information Start Date: 2003-11-21 End Date: 2004-12-31 Status: Completed Cost: 11 424 000 GBP Project Summary Russia constructed some 250 nuclear submarines; of which about 90 are Strategic type (Housing ballistic missiles) and the remainder were General Purpose (GP) type carrying torpedoes and/or cruise missiles. Since its signature of the START agreement, Russia has accepted an obligation to progressively reduce its submarine fleet, and this intention has been reinforced by the decline in funding for the Russian navy since Perestroika, which has both accelerated the withdrawal of submarines from active service, and inhibited work on defuelling and dismantling these submarines. The Strategic submarines issue has been the subject of a bilateral agreement with the US (under its Co- Operative Threat Reduction Programme) that agreed to fund the dismantling of about 30 such submarines. However, there has hitherto been no corresponding aid programme to fund the dismantling of GP submarines. Although of somewhat lower military significance, these are of high safety and environmental significance, since they are in many cases older than the Strategic submarines, and have in many cases deteriorated to the point where they can no longer be relied on to remain afloat. Although most of these older GP submarines have been withdrawn from service, many have not yet been defuelled, and the prospect of their sinking with their nuclear fuel still on board has been a matter of rising concern to Russia and its neighbours. The underlying objectives of this project are: - To undertake dismantling of two General Purpose nuclear submarines in NW Russia nominated by MINATOM and agreed by the UK DTI.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Moscow Defense Brief Your Professional Guide Inside # 2, 2011
    Moscow Defense Brief Your Professional Guide Inside # 2, 2011 Troubled Waters CONTENTS Defense Industries #2 (24), 2011 Medium-term Prospects for MiG Corporation PUBLISHER After Interim MMRCA Competition Results 2 Centre for Russian Helicopter Industry: Up and Away 4 Analysis of Strategies and Technologies Arms Trade CAST Director & Publisher Exports of Russian Fighter Jets in 1999-2010 8 Ruslan Pukhov Editor-in-Chief Mikhail Barabanov International Relations Advisory Editors Georgian Lesson for Libya 13 Konstantin Makienko Alexey Pokolyavin Researchers Global Security Ruslan Aliev Polina Temerina Missile Defense: Old Problem, No New Solution 15 Dmitry Vasiliev Editorial Office Armed Forces 3 Tverskaya-Yamskaya, 24, office 5, Moscow, Russia 125047 Reform of the Russian Navy in 2008-2011 18 phone: +7 499 251 9069 fax: +7 495 775 0418 http://www.mdb.cast.ru/ Facts & Figures To subscribe, contact Incidents Involving Russian Submarines in 1992-2010 23 phone: +7 499 251 9069 or e-mail: [email protected] 28 Moscow Defense Brief is published by the Centre for Analysis of Strategies Our Authors and Technologies All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording or otherwise, without reference to Moscow Defense Brief. Please note that, while the Publisher has taken all reasonable care in the compilation of this publication, the Publisher cannot accept responsibility for any errors or omissions in this publication or for any loss arising therefrom. Authors’ opinions do not necessary reflect those of the Publisher or Editor Translated by: Ivan Khokhotva Computer design & pre-press: B2B design bureau Zebra www.zebra-group.ru Cover Photo: K-433 Svyatoy Georgiy Pobedonosets (Project 667BDR) nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine at the Russian Pacific Fleet base in Vilyuchinsk, February 25, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive Contamination
    NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 NEI-NO--726 \ Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin BELLONA V .., I! V: NO9600025 Bellona Report Volume 2:1996 The Russian Northern Fleet Sources of Radioactive contamination Thomas Nilsen Igor Kudrik Alexandr Nikitin 2 C 1 0 1 The publication of this report is sponsored by: Stiftelsen Fritt Ord/Foundation for Freedom of Expression (Main contributor) Contributors: Norsk Hydro a.s. Petrochemicals Division NORSAS, Norwegian Resource Centre for Waste Aker ASA Management and Recycling Chemical Workers Union of Norway Norsk Sivilingeni0rers Forening Norwegian Seafood Export Council Norges ingeni0rorganisasjon (NITO) FESIL AS Green Sea Operations AS Norwegian Society of Engineers UNI STOREBRAND Confederation of Norwegian Business and Industry AGAAS WASA Forsiikring (Stockholm) OZO Hotwater A/S Norwegian Fishermen's Association Energiforsyningens Fellesorganisasjon EnFO Norwegian Federation of Oilworkers' Trade Union Store Norske Spitsbergen Kullkompani AS Norwegian Polar Institute Svalbard Samfunnsdrift AS Odda Smelteverk Norzink AS Published by: The Bellona Foundation Norway: P.O. Box 2141, Griinerl0kka N-0505 OSLO, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Russia: Brussels: USA Russia Bellona Europa Bellona USA 183038 Murmansk 142-144 Avenue de Tervueren 310 D Street NE P.O. Box 4310 B-1150Bruxelles Washington, DC 20002 Bellona Russia Belgium USA E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] URL: Photos: Copying permitted when source is http://www.grida.no/ngo/bellona/ John Berg (archive), Thorbj0rn Bj0r- stated. kli, Per Stale Bugjerde, Nils B0hmer, ISBN 82-993138-5-6 The Norwegian Defence, Frederic Comments to this report are welco- ISSN 0806-3451 Hauge, Aleksej Klimov, Igor Kudrik, med.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Rearmament Programme
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 7877, 24 January 2017 Russia's rearmament By Claire Mills programme Contents: 1. Background 2. Russian defence expenditure since 2001 3. Programme of military modernisation 4. Progress against the State Armament Plan 5. Looking forward – the State Armament Plan 2018-2025 www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Russia's rearmament programme Contents Summary 4 1. Background 9 1.1 Brief outline of current military assets 10 2. Russian defence expenditure since 2001 13 2.1 Spending in 2016 15 3. Programme of military modernisation 16 3.1 State Armament Plan 2007-2015 17 3.2 2008 programme of military reform 18 3.3 State Armament Plan 2011-2020 21 4. Progress against the State Armament Plan 23 4.1 Complicating issues 24 The impact of defence inflation 24 The military-industrial complex 25 4.2 How far has rearmament progressed? 28 Nuclear forces 28 Revitalisation of the Navy 31 Modernisation of the Aerospace Force 34 Ground forces 37 5. Looking forward – the State Armament Plan 2018-2025 40 5.1 Projected spending 40 5.2 Expectations for the next SAP 40 3 Commons Library Briefing, 24 January 2017 Cover page image copyright: Moscow military parade 2015 by Kremlin.ru. Licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 international license / image cropped. 4 Russia's rearmament programme Summary The decline of the Russian military during the 1990s was regarded as a natural consequence of the fall of the Soviet Union, a crippled Russian economy and a political leadership searching for identity.
    [Show full text]
  • MARITIME Security &Defence M
    June MARITIME 2021 a7.50 Security D 14974 E &Defence MSD From the Sea and Beyond ISSN 1617-7983 • Key Developments in... • Amphibious Warfare www.maritime-security-defence.com • • Asia‘s Power Balance MITTLER • European Submarines June 2021 • Port Security REPORT NAVAL GROUP DESIGNS, BUILDS AND MAINTAINS SUBMARINES AND SURFACE SHIPS ALL AROUND THE WORLD. Leveraging this unique expertise and our proven track-record in international cooperation, we are ready to build and foster partnerships with navies, industry and knowledge partners. Sovereignty, Innovation, Operational excellence : our common future will be made of challenges, passion & engagement. POWER AT SEA WWW.NAVAL-GROUP.COM - Design : Seenk Naval Group - Crédit photo : ©Naval Group, ©Marine Nationale, © Ewan Lebourdais NAVAL_GROUP_AP_2020_dual-GB_210x297.indd 1 28/05/2021 11:49 Editorial Hard Choices in the New Cold War Era The last decade has seen many of the foundations on which post-Cold War navies were constructed start to become eroded. The victory of the United States and its Western Allies in the unfought war with the Soviet Union heralded a new era in which navies could forsake many of the demands of Photo: author preparing for high intensity warfare. Helping to ensure the security of the maritime shipping networks that continue to dominate global trade and the vast resources of emerging EEZs from asymmetric challenges arguably became many navies’ primary raison d’être. Fleets became focused on collabora- tive global stabilisation far from home and structured their assets accordingly. Perhaps the most extreme example of this trend has been the German Navy’s F125 BADEN-WÜRTTEMBERG class frig- ates – hugely sophisticated and expensive ships designed to prevail only in lower threat environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Afanasyeva V.Pdf (5.070Mb)
    Logistics and Transport BE 303 E Supply chain of the Shtokman field development project by Veronika Afanasyeva Spring 2009 Abstract Supply chains are always fairly complex, and each industry’s chain has its own quirks and characteristics. The strategic nature of the product makes the oil and gas supply chain distinct from other industries. The given work sets a task to investigate the supply chain in oil and gas on the example of the Shtokman gas and condensate field development project. It is quite a challenging mission if to take into consideration the size of the project and its unique character. The given research is conducted to develop and extend the supply chain theory in oil and gas industry. The research objectives lead to use the theory-oriented type of research with stress on theory testing. Under these circumstances, the single-case study method and semi- structured interviews as a primary source of data are chosen. To build the entire supply chain of the Shtokman project there is a need to describe it first. The history of the field exploration, selection of partners, engineering concept of the project are reflected in the empirical part. Additionally, the project’s description includes the transportation system and marketing strategy of natural gas and LNG distribution. Moreover, the environmental and political aspects of the project which are essential for oil and gas field development find its reflection in the practical part of the work. The analysis of the project with regard to the received from interviews data and other reliable sources of information helps to build the supply chain in the Shtokman project and put value on the supply chain integration and cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea
    FNI Report 7/2008 Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Arild Moe and Lars Rowe [email protected] – [email protected] Report commissioned by the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association September 2008 Copyright © Fridtjof Nansen Institute 2008 Title Petroleum Activity in the Russian Barents Sea: Constraints and Options for Norwegian Offshore and Shipping Companies Publication Type and Number Pages FNI-Report 7/2008 26 Authors ISBN Arild Moe and Lars Rowe 978-82-7613-530-5-print version 978-82-7613-531-2-electronic version Project ISSN 0879 1504-9744 Abstract Presently most attention in the Barents Sea is given to the Shtokman project. Experience from development of this field, where there are still many uncertainties, will have large consequences for the further development program and relations with foreign companies. The exploration activity going on is fairly limited, but over the last few years there has been a struggle over licenses and control over exploration capacity. In the medium term the goal of rapid development of the Arctic continental shelf has become intertwined with a comprehensive government effort to modernise the domestic shipbuilding industry to make it able to cover most of the needs offshore. With the shipbuilding industry in a deep crisis these goals are not fully reconcilable. Russia will either have to accept more foreign involvement, or scale down its offshore ambitions. We believe a combination of the two alternatives is likely.
    [Show full text]