DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Federation St.Petersburg Industrial Investor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Federation St.Petersburg Industrial Investor Dear friends! I am glad to welcome the publication of a new directory dedicated to investment in the industry of St. Petersburg! During its existence the edition became the real guide for business people on industrial investment pro­ jects of the Northern Capital. St. Petersburg is the largest industrial, transport, scientific and educational and tourist center of Russia and Europe. Today the city takes the leading positions in many indicators of economic and social deve­ lopment. Following the results of 2017 the index of industrial production in St. Petersburg in comparison with 2016 amounted to 105.5 % (on average in Russia — 101.0 %). In 2017 the volume of dispatched industrial production in St. Petersburg amounted to 2866.8 billion ru­ bles — 106.6 % compared to the level of 2016. The contribution of the industrial complex in the formation of a profitable part of budgets of all levels in comparison with other sectors of the city economy is the highest one — 46.5 %. Along with traditional sectors — shipbuilding, power and heavy engineering — the modern innovative high­tech enterprises are being created and successfully work. Automobile and medical­pharmaceutical clusters became the real drivers of city economy. Important competitive advantages of St. Petersburg are the favorable business climate and competent human resources, the developed infrastructure and fast access to the main markets of Russia and the European Union. The Government of Saint Petersburg pays priority attention to implementation of pro­ duction investment projects, the balanced development of urban areas, including so-called “industrial belt”. Companies and investors implementing modern technologies are offered tax incentives and other preferences. Residents of the Special economic zone, technoparks and business incubators, industrial parks and industrial zones have unique conditions for placement of their production facilities. It should be noted that St. Petersburg has contributed to the improvement of Russia’s position in the “Doing Business-2019” rating. Assessment of the comfort of doing business in our city was conducted by experts on the results of a survey of entrepreneurs. In the “Doing Business-2019“ ranking among 190 countries of the world, Russia took 31st place, strengthening its position by 4 points over the year. On behalf of the Committee on Industrial Policy and Innovations of St. Petersburg I invite you to business cooperation and implementation of investment industrial projects for the benefit of our city, our country! Welcome to St. Petersburg! Chairman of the Committee on industrial policy and innovation of St. Petersburg M. S. Meyksin Content 1. The economic potential of St. Petersburg .......................................................6 1.1. Socio-economic indicators of St. Petersburg ................................................6 1.2. The population of St. Petersburg ....................................................................8 1.3. Logistics complex of St. Petersburg ................................................................9 1.4. Consumer market of St. Petersburg .............................................................13 1.5. Financial infrastructure in St. Petersburg ....................................................14 1.6. Foreign economic activity in St. Petersburg ............................................ 15 1.7. Innovative activities in St. Petersburg ..........................................................17 1.8. Warehouse, office and retail property in St. Petersburg ...........................18 2. Industry of St. Petersburg ...............................................................................20 2.1. Structure and dynamics of the industrial complex of St. Petersburg .....20 2.2. Industrial and infrastructure projects in St. Petersburg ............................24 3. Industrial and investment policy of St. Petersburg .....................................26 3.1. State support of investment activities in St. Petersburg ...........................26 3.1.1. Financial and tax incentives for investment activities in St. Petersburg ..................................................................... 31 3.1.2. Investment policy in accordance with the legislation of St. Petersburg .................................................. 35 3.2. State support of the industry of St. Petersburg ..........................................40 3.2.1. Clusters in the industry of St. Petersburg .......................................... 40 3.2.2. Promotion of technological development of enterprises ............... 61 3.2.3. Development of industrial and innovation infrastructure of St. Petersburg ........................................................... 72 3.2.4. The largest international events in St. Petersburg ........................... 87 4 4. Operations in the implementation of investments in the industry of St. Petersburg ....................................................................92 4.1. The procedure for the selection of land for the implementation of industrial investment project ....................................................................92 4.2. The procedure for making decisions on the provision of real estate for construction, reconstruction, adaptation for modern use. ..........................................................................94 4.3. The procedure for the acquisition of land in the property or for rent by the owners of buildings and structures ..............................99 4.4. The procedure for obtaining a building permit ....................................... 101 4.5. The procedure for the provision of land plots for rent for purposes not related to construction ................................................. 102 4.6. The order of transfer of non-residential facilities for rent ..................... 104 4.7. State registration of real estate .................................................................. 106 5. Application ......................................................................................................108 Contacts ...............................................................................................................118 5 1. The economic potential of St. Petersburg 1.1. Socio-economic indicators of St. Petersburg Today St. Petersburg is one of the largest megalopolises of Russia and Europe, it is the economic, cultural and tourist center. Among competitive advantages of St. Petersburg are: • Existence of one of the largest consumer markets of EAC and EU (total number of the population of the city taking into account agglomeration is over 6 million people with the high level of income); • High extent of diversification of city economy; • High growth rates of GRP which exceed similar indicators of other regions; • Availability of direct access to the largest markets in Europe and Russia. The main socio-economic indexes of St. Petersburg in 2017: • The population is 5352.1 million people; • The average monthly salary is 54.3 thousand rubles; • Retail trade turnover is 1319.1 billion rubles; • Investments into fixed capital are 658.5 billion rubles. Gross regional product of St. Petersburg The internal regional product of St. Petersburg (GRP) in 2017 was 3839.4 billion rubles (717.3 thousand rubles per capita) that is 1.02 % higher than a similar indicator of 2016. In value terms, the indicator for the year increased by 97.3 million rubles. St. Petersburg takes the 3rd place in the Russian Federation on GRP volumes. Growth of the GRP indicator since 2013 testifies to a stable economic situation in St. Petersburg. Gross regional product of St. Petersburg in 2014–2017, billion rubles 72.1 . 7. 2661.2 201 2015 2016 2017 6 Evaluation of the structure of gross regional product in 2017, in % eal estate transactions 25% Industrial production 20% Wholesale and retail trade 20% Transport and communications 13% Other activities 8 Health 5 Construction 5 Education 4 Investments St. Petersburg is one of the most investment attractive regions of the Russian Federation with stable mac­ roeconomic situation. The main advantages of city economy to investors are: • High diversification of economy of the region; • High extent of development of infrastructure of the city; • Direct access to world logistic network; • Direct access to the largest sales markets of the European Union and central regions of Russia; • One of the largest industrially developed regions of Russia; • The developed region service sector; • The leading positions in the ratings of investment attractiveness of regions of Russia; • The developed system of projects support and supports of investors; • Financial and tax incentives of investment and innovative activities. The rate of investment in fixed capital in the share of GRP of St. Petersburg is on a par with such European cities as Stockholm, Madrid and Hamburg. The volume of investments in fixed capital of large organizations of the economy of St. Petersburg in 2017 amounted to 477.2 billion rubles. the Volume of investments in fixed capital (except for budgetary funds) amounted to 554.9 billion rubles. The largest volume of investment following the results of 2017: • Operations with real estate — 26.1 %; • Industrial production — 24.8 %; • Transportation and storage — 13.5 %. Following the results of 9 months 2017 according to the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, 4.4 billion dollars of direct foreign investments have come to economy of St. Petersburg. The share of St. Petersburg in the total
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Russia's Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry*
    Russia’s Policy on Strengthening the Navy and the Defense Industry* Yoshiaki Sakaguchi** Abstract The Russian government has begun rebuilding the Russian Navy as a part of the military reforms since October 2008. The Russian leadership has set out a clear policy on strengthening the Navy. Furthermore, the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020,” unveiled at the end of 2010, presents that 23.4% of the total budget will be allocated to the procurement and development of vessels. This program and the budgetary measures for its realization have contributed to the gradual progress in the construction of new naval vessels since 2011. Nevertheless, the problems confronting the Russian defense industry remain unresolved, putting into question the ability of the defense industry to meet the high procurement targets identified in the State Weapons Program. Introduction A large-scale military reform has been under way in Russia since October 2008, with the focus of reform now shifting to modernization of obsolete armament following the near-completion of organizational and structural reform. The replacement and modernization of armament have been undertaken on the basis of the “State Weapons Program for 2011-2020” (hereinafter referred to as the “current State Weapons Program”), formulated in late 2010. The reform to equip the armed forces with a high degree of mobility and professionalism as well as the latest equipment is gradually beginning to take shape. Under these circumstances, the Navy is emerging out of the battered state that ensued after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The building of new naval vessels that had been stagnant for some time and their introduction into the Navy can be seen again.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Rim Economies
    Baltic Rim Economies Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Poland - Baltic Russia Bimonthly Review ISSUE NO. 5, 31 OCTOBER 2008 ECONOMIC REVIEWS: ESTONIA Page 1 LATVIA Page 2 LITHUANIA Page 3 POLAND Page 4 ST. PETERSBURG Page 5 LENINGRAD REGION Page 6 KALININGRAD REGION Page 7 EXPERT ARTICLES: José Manuel Durão Barroso: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Page 8 Paula Lehtomäki : Cleaner, safer and brighter future of the Baltic Sea Page 9 Jaak Aaviksoo: Events in Georgia provoke discussions on security in good, old, peaceful Europe Page 10 Siiri Oviir: Gas pipeline to the Baltic Sea – should it come in a civilized way or under the dictate of the big and the powerful? Page 12 Artis Pabriks: Baltic security reflections in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian conflict Page 13 Efthimios E. Mitropoulos: Busy Baltic to benefit from global pollution measures Page 14 Jari Luoto: EU focuses on the Baltic Sea Page 15 André Mernier: A role for the Energy Charter in a new Russia-EU Partnership Agreement Page 16 Timo Rajala: Finland is facing major energy decisions Page 18 Karlis Mikelsons: Environmentally friendly for sustainable growth Page 19 Reinier Zwitserloot: Nord Stream – making more European energy solidarity possible Page 20 Viktoras Valentukevicius: Current and future activities of Lietuvos Dujos AB Page 21 Seppo Remes: Russian gas can unite Europe – if we allow it Page 22 Aleksandra Mierzyńska and Krzysztof Parkoła: PGNiG – trying to be one step further Page 24 Tapio Reponen: Profiling as a key success factor in modern university strategies Page 25 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies ISSUE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • OOB of the Russian Fleet (Kommersant, 2008)
    The Entire Russian Fleet - Kommersant Moscow 21/03/08 09:18 $1 = 23.6781 RUR Moscow 28º F / -2º C €1 = 36.8739 RUR St.Petersburg 25º F / -4º C Search the Archives: >> Today is Mar. 21, 2008 11:14 AM (GMT +0300) Moscow Forum | Archive | Photo | Advertising | Subscribe | Search | PDA | RUS Politics Mar. 20, 2008 E-mail | Home The Entire Russian Fleet February 23rd is traditionally celebrated as the Soviet Army Day (now called the Homeland Defender’s Day), and few people remember that it is also the Day of Russia’s Navy. To compensate for this apparent injustice, Kommersant Vlast analytical weekly has compiled The Entire Russian Fleet directory. It is especially topical since even Russia’s Commander-in-Chief compared himself to a slave on the galleys a week ago. The directory lists all 238 battle ships and submarines of Russia’s Naval Fleet, with their board numbers, year of entering service, name and rank of their commanders. It also contains the data telling to which unit a ship or a submarine belongs. For first-class ships, there are schemes and tactic-technical characteristics. So detailed data on all Russian Navy vessels, from missile cruisers to base type trawlers, is for the first time compiled in one directory, making it unique in the range and amount of information it covers. The Entire Russian Fleet carries on the series of publications devoted to Russia’s armed forces. Vlast has already published similar directories about the Russian Army (#17-18 in 2002, #18 in 2003, and #7 in 2005) and Russia’s military bases (#19 in 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024
    The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Report Price: US$4,800 (Single User) 1 The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024 Summary “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” offers the reader detailed analysis of the global submarine market over the next ten years, and provides market size forecasts. It covers the key technological and market trends in the submarine market. The demand for global submarines is anticipated to be driven by growing regional tensions, coupled with maritime conflicts. The new technological advancements in the sector will also drive demand. The market is expected to be dominated by North America, followed by Asia Pacific and Europe. In spite of the budget sequestration measures, the US still has the highest spend in the sector and is almost equal to the spending in Asia-Pacific, which is the second largest spending region. Asia Pacific is the second largest market for submarines with major spenders in the region including China, India, Australia and Japan. “The Global Submarine Market 2014–2024” provides detailed analysis of the current industry size and growth expectations from 2014 to 2024, including highlights of key growth stimulators. It also benchmarks the industry against key global markets and provides a detailed understanding of emerging opportunities in specific areas. Key Findings A major finding in the report entails that the sector demand will be largely driven by increase in maritime security threats and need for replacement of obsolete submarines; leading to consistent growth in the market. The demand for submarines is also anticipated to be driven by the need for the balance of power by countries with major militaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Economy: Trends and Perspectives 08'2011
    © GAIDAR INSTITUTE FOR THE ECONOMIC POLICY 3-5, Gazetny pereulok, Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation Phone (495)629-67-36, fax (495)697-88-16, Email: [email protected] www.iep.ru RUSSIAN ECONOMY: TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES 08’2011 MONTHLY BULLETIN: THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN AUGUST: PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND MAJOR TRENDS 2 THE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC RESULTS OF AUGUST 2011 (S.Zhavoronkov) 4 INFLATION AND MONETARY POLICY (N.Luksha) 7 FINANCIAL MARKETS (N.Burkova, E.Khudko) 10 REAL ECONOMY: TRENDS AND FACTORS (O.Izryadnova) 16 INVESMENTS IN REAL ECONOMY SECTOR (O.Izryadnova) 19 FOREIGN TRADE (N.Volovik, K.Kharina) 24 STATE BUDGET (E.Fomina) 28 RUSSIAN BANKING SECTOR (S.Borisov) 31 HOUSING MORTGAGE IN THE RF (G.Zadonsky) 35 ECONOMIC GROWTH FACTORS IN 2010 – THE FIRST HALF YEAR OF 2011 (E.Astafi eva) 39 ECONOMIC LEGISLATION REVIEW (I.Tolmacheva) 42 REVIEW OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION GOVERNMENT IN AUGUST 2011 (M.Goldin) 44 AN OVERVIEW OF NORMATIVE DOCUMENTS ON TAXATION ISSUES FOR JULY AND AUGUST 2011 45 (L.Anisimova) AMENDMENTS TO THE BUDGETING LEGAL FRAMEWORK (M.Goldin) 50 RUSSIAN ECONOMY: TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY IN AUGUST: PRELIMINARY RESULTS AND MAJOR TRENDS The socio-political situation in August 2011 was rather calm although more ‘businesslike’ than usually. The most notable event was Georgy Poltavchenko’s appointment to the post of St Petersburg governor. In his previous role of the RF President’s Representative in the Central Federal District, Poltavchenko had defi nitely failed to achieve much in the public sphere, and proved himself one of the most lackluster offi cials of this rank.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Planning
    Leonid Lavrov, Elena Molotkova, Andrey Surovenkov — Pages 29–42 ON EVALUATING THE CONDITION OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG HISTORIC CENTER DOI: 10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-3-29-42 Urban Planning ON EVALUATING THE CONDITION OF THE SAINT PETERSBURG HISTORIC CENTER Leonid Lavrov, Elena Molotkova*, Andrey Surovenkov Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Vtoraja Krasnoarmeyskaya st., 4, Saint Petersburg, Russia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Introduction: This study was prompted by the introduction of the urban environment quality index into the system operated by the Russian Ministry of Construction Industry, Housing and Utilities Sector (Minstroy). We note that the ˝environment-centric˝ methodologies were already worked on and applied to housing studies in Leningrad as far back as during the 1970–1980s, and that the insights from these studies can now be used for analyzing the current state of the urban environment. Purpose of the study and methods: The information reviewed in this article gives us the first glimpse of the tangible urban environment in the historic center of Saint Petersburg. Many features of this part of the city are reminiscent of other European metropolises, but the fact that the historic center is split into three parts by vast waterways, that the construction began from the ground up in the middle of the wilderness, and that the active urban development phase lasted only a century and a half (from the 1760s to the 1910s), has a major part to play. Results: We use quantitative data to describe the features of the Saint Petersburg historic center and compare our findings to the features of European metropolises, across such parameters as spatial geometry, transportation and pedestrian links, and environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Centuries of Multi-Storied St. Petersburg
    E3S Web of Conferences 33, 01003 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183301003 HRC 2017 Three centuries of multi-storied St. Petersburg Leonid Lavrov1, Fedor Perov1,, Aleksandra Eremeeva1 and Vladimir Temnov1 1Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (SPSUACE), 2-nd Krasnoarmeiskaya St. 4, 190005, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. The article is devoted to assessment of the role of high-rise buildings in the St. Petersburg historic city’s ensemble. Features of formation of city architectural look, the conditions of city typical silhouette’s appearance which is characterized by the contrast of a small number of high-rise structures with a low horizontal mass building are observed. The consequences of the emergence of a significant number of great height buildings, the silhouette of which conflicts with the traditional St. Petersburg landscape’s compositional principles, are analyzed. The economic reasons of high-rise construction of residential and office buildings are given. The conclusions about the prospects of St. Petersburg high-rise construction in the light of city-building and economic factors are made. 1 Introduction The problem of transformation of the historic St. Petersburg’s specific silhouette, which evolved over three centuries, appeared at the beginning of the new century. The weakening of height regulations in the mid of 1990-ies allowed to place buildings up to a height of 28- 40 meters in the city center and in the depth of the districts which led to the fact that there are more and more objects in the classic urban panoramas, which destroy the "skyline" beauty. The research urges to turn to the assessment of the role of high-rise structures in the ensemble of the historic St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Federation
    Asylum Research Centre The Russian Federa�on: LGBTI Country of origin informa�on to support the adjudica�on of asylum claims from Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (‘LGBTI’) asylum seekers /shutterstock.com Bennian 17 July 2012 Cover photo © 17th July 2012 Country-of-origin information to support the adjudication of asylum claims from Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex (‘LGBTI’) asylum-seekers The Russian Federation Commissioned by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Division of International Protection. Any views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of UNHCR. Contents 1. The legal position of LGBTI persons in the country concerned including criminalisation p. 3 2. Evidence of the implementation of legal provisions, including police and judicial treatment p. 11 and punishment of same sex activity 3. Societal attitude to LGBTI persons, evidence of non-state persecution and discrimination p. 31 4. Homophobia and transphobia in government institutions (including but not limited to p. 47 government statements state owned media, prisons, education, health system) 5. State willingness and ability to provide effective protection to LGBTI persons; (particularly p. 54 police attitude to LGBTI persons, investigations into crimes perpetrated against LGBTI persons) 6. (Limitations in) access to social and economic rights for LGBTI persons p. 60 7. Sources consulted (including descriptions of lesser known sources) p. 72 1 Explanatory Note The following non-exhaustive excerpts of COI are from 2011-2012. The COI is presented in reverse chronological order and is cited directly from the original source, including original footnotes.
    [Show full text]
  • List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St
    List of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia for St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region № Units Addresses п\п 1 Admiralteysky District of Saint 190013, Saint Petersburg Vereyskaya Street, 39 Petersburg 2 Vasileostrovsky District of Saint 199106, Saint Petersburg, Vasilyevsky Island, 19th Line, 12a Petersburg 3 Vyborgsky District of Saint 194156, Saint Petersburg, Prospekt Parkhomenko, 18 Petersburg 4 Kalininsky District of Saint 195297, Saint Petersburg, Bryantseva Street, 15 Petersburg 5 Kirovsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Avtovskaya Street, 22 Petersburg 6 Kolpinsky District of Saint 198152, Saint Petersburg, Kolpino, Pavlovskaya Street, 1 Petersburg 7 Krasnogvardeisky District of 195027, Saint Petersburg, Bolsheokhtinsky Prospekt, 11/1 Saint Petersburg 8 Krasnoselsky District of Saint 198329, Saint Petersburg, Tambasova Street, 4 Petersburg 9 Kurortny District of Saint 197706, Saint Petersburg, Sestroretsk, Primorskoe Highway, Petersburg 280 10 Kronshtadtsky District of Saint 197760, Saint Petersburg, Kronstadt, Lenina Prospekt, 20 Petersburg 11 Moskovsky District of Saint 196135, Saint Petersburg, Tipanova Street, 3 Petersburg 12 Nevsky District of Saint 192171, Saint Petersburg, Sedova Street, 86 Petersburg 13 Petrogradsky District of Saint 197022, Saint Petersburg, Grota Street, 1/3 Petersburg 14 Petrodvortsovy District of Saint 198516, Saint Petersburg, Peterhof, Petersburg Konnogrenaderskaya Street., 1 15 Primorsky District of Saint 197374 Saint Petersburg, Yakhtennaya Street, 7/2
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    RCHITECTURE DURING THE EPOCH OF PETER THE AGREAT (1703-1725) Galina P. Chudesova*11G.P St Petersburg National Research University of Information Technology, Mechanics and Optics (ITMO University) St Petersburg, Russia Keywords: architecture, St Petersburg, maximaphily, Cabin of Peter the Great 1. Introduction In recent decades, there has been increasing interest in the House of Romanov. An almost total absence of information on the life and activities of the members of this dy- nasty during the Soviet period led to an explosion of interest in this theme after the col- lapse of the USSR. In the post-Soviet period, a stream of literature about the Romanov dynasty looded society, focusing on the architects of that time as creators of particular architectural monuments. As a result, during the translation of collective knowledge, information about the role of the monarchs in creating the architectural heritage of St. Petersburg is practically absent. The present article offers an unusual way of looking at St Petersburg. This is the irst in the series of articles entitled “Architectural Chronicle of St Petersburg”, devoted to deining the contribution each monarch made to the development of the city. The aspects relating to the formation of social memory in society and its implications for the future have been suficiently studied in the historical and philosophical sense, therefore, the author of the paper has considered any scientiic insights unnecessary. Of all the approaches scientists have taken in studying heritage, the author is closest to the informative approach proposed by Ya.K. Rebane and further developed by such scientists as V.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Owners of Small Vessels, Pleasure Craft and Sport Sailboats
    GUIDELINES FOR OWNERS OF SMALL VESSELS, PLEASURE CRAFT AND SPORT SAILBOATS Contents CHAPTER 1. Tourist routes along the waterways of the North-West of Russia. .............. 6 CHAPTER 2. Yacht clubs having guest berths ................................................................ 10 CHAPTER 3. Specifics of navigation in certain areas of waterways ............................... 12 3.1.1. Navigation in the border area of the Russian Federation. ...................................... 12 3.1.2. Pleasure craft navigation on the Saimaa Canal. .................................................... 13 3.1.3. Navigation of small vessels and yachts in Vyborg Bay. ........................................ 14 3.1.4. Navigation of small vessels and yachts the water area of Saint Petersburg. .......... 15 3.1.5. Procedure for entry of vessels to the sea ports Big Port of Saint Petersburg and Passenger Port of Saint Petersburg. ................................................................................ 18 CHAPTER 4. Procedures for customs and border control and customs operations ......... 19 4.1. Regulatory and legal framework. ............................................................................. 19 4.2. Specifics of control operations to check the grounds for passing the state border by Russian and foreign small vessels, sport sailboats and pleasure craft ............................. 22 4.3. Procedure for the passage of ships in the HMCP of the sea port Big Port of Saint Petersburg (terminal for servicing small vessels, sport sailboats
    [Show full text]