sign in sign up
<<
Home , Shale oil extraction

Bibliometric assessment of global research 2009 – 2018: Grey literature list Annex 2. Grey literature list

Grey literature is defined as research that Examples of grey literature we collected are: conference papers, pre-print articles, policy documents and working is not formally published by commercial papers and publications from governmental agencies. journal publishers or those with limited distribution namely those not listed in The grey literature list does not seek to be exhaustive and was compiled from suggestions from a wide range online bibliographic database systems. of individuals during the project. It has been included for general information only. The inclusion of records or papers in the grey literature list does not indicate the endorsement or otherwise for that paper by either the Royal Society or the Royal Academy of Engineering. The accuracy of the title, authors, organisation or date published has not been verified.

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 2 References

1. 10:10 Climate Action. (2017). Fracking, nuclear and wind: which would 20. Chambers, D., Kozar, M., Messinger, T., Mulder, M., Pelak, A., & White, you rather have in your backyard? Opinion Poll. J. (2015). Water quality of and stream base flow in the Marcellus Shale Gas Field of the Monongahela River Basin. 2. ACIL Allen. (2017). The Economic Impacts of a Potential Shale Gas U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. Development in the Northern Territory. The Economic Impacts of a Potential Shale Gas Development in the Northern Territory. 21. Chief Medical Officer of Health's Recommendations Concerning Shale Gas Development in New Brunswick. (2012). 3. Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure UK. (2015). Technical Support for the Risk Management of Unconventional Hydrocarbon 22. Chilvers, J., Pallett, H., & Hargreaves, T. (2017). Public engagement Extraction: Final Report. European Commission DG Environment. with energy: broadening evidence, policy and practice. UK Energy Research Centre. 4. Anderson, K., & Broderick, J. (2017). Natural gas and climate change. 23. Church of England. (2016). Shale Gas and Fracking: A Briefing Paper 5. Andrews, I. (2013). The Carboniferous Bowland Shale gas study: geology from the Mission and Public Affairs Council and the Environment and resource estimation. British Geological Survey for Department of Working Group of the Church of England. Energy and Climate Change. 24. Clean Water Action. (2017). Oklahoma Drinking Water at Risk from Oil 6. Balcombe, P., Anderson, K., Speirs, J., Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2015). and Gas Injection Wells:Exposing Oklahoma Corporation Commission's Methane and CO2 Emissions from the Natural Gas Supply Chain: Flawed Drinking Water Protection Policies. An Evidence Assessment. Sustainable Gas Institute. 25. Colley, H., & Donnelly, K. (2012). and Water 7. Bommer, J. (2017). Predicting and Monitoring Ground Motions Induced Resources: Separating the Frack from the Fiction. Pacific Institute. by Hydraulic Fracturing. Oil & Gas Authority. 26.  Department of Public Health & Environment. (2017). 8. Bond, C., Roberts, J., Hastings, A., Shipton, Z., Joao, E., & Tabyldy Kyzy Assessment of Potential Public Health Effects from Oil and Gas J., &. (2014). Life-Cycle Assessment of Emissions from Operations in Colorado. Retrieved from https://naturalgassolution.org/ Unconventional Gas in . ClimateXChange. wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Assessment-Potential-Public-Health- 9. Bradshaw, M. (2017). Future UK Gas Security: Upstream Security of Effects-Oil-Gas-Operations-Colorado.pdf Supply About the UK Gas Security Forum A Supply Chain Approach 27. Committee on Climate Change. (2016). Onshore : to Gas Security. Warwick Business School. The compatibility of UK onshore petroleum with meeting the UK's 10. Bradshaw, M. (2018). Future UK Gas Security: The Future Role of Gas? carbon budgets. Warwick Business School. 28. Concerned Health Professionals of New York & Physicians for Social 11. British Geological Survey. (2018). Environmental monitoring, Lancashire: Responsibility. (2018). Compendium of Scientific, Medical, and Media Real-time data. Findings Demonstrating Risks and Harms of Fracking (Unconventional Gas and Oil Extraction) (5th ed.). 12. British Geological Survey. (n.d.). Atmospheric composition in Lancashire. Retrieved from https://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/groundwater/shaleGas/ 29. Cook P., B., & Williams, J. (2013). Engineering Energy: Unconventional monitoring/atmosphericComposition.html Gas Production. Australian Council of Learned Academies.

13. British Geological Survey. (n.d.). BGS Midland Valley of Scotland Shale 30. Council of Canadian Academies. (2014). Environmental Impacts of Shale reports – GOV.UK. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/ Gas Extraction in Canada. publications/bgs-midland-valley-of-scotland-shale-reports 31. Cuadrilla Resources. (2014). Preston New Road Environment Impact 14. Broderick, J., & Anderson, K. (2012). Has US Shale Gas Reduced CO2 Assessment. Emissions? Tyndall Manchester. 32. Cuadrilla Resources. (2018). Hydraulic Fracture Plan PNR 2. 15. Broomfield, M. (2012). Support to the identification of potential risks 33. Cuadrilla Resources. (2018). Hydraulic Fracture Plan PNR1/1Z. for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe. AEA Technology 34. Cuadrilla Resources. (n.d.). Cuadrilla ePortal: Hydraulic Fracturing.

16. Broomfield, M., Donovan, B., & Leonard, A. (2014). Considerations 35. Cuadrilla Resources. (n.d.). Our sites . Retrieved from for quantifying fugitive methane releases from shale gas operations. https://cuadrillaresources.uk/our-sites/ Environment Agency. 36. David Hughes, J. (2018). Shale Reality Check: Drilling Into the U.S. 17. Brunt, H., & Kibble, A. (2018). Public Health Wales' response to Natural Government's Rosy Projections for Shale Gas & Production Resources Wales initial evidence programme on and Through 2050. Post Carbon Institute. gas. Public Health Wales. 37. Davies, R., Mathias, S., Moss, J., Hustoft, S., & Newport, L. (2012). 18. Cardno Entrix. (2012). Hydraulic Fracturing Study: PXP Inglewood Oil Field. Hydraulic fractures: How far can they go?

19. CERES. (2016). Hydraulic Fracturing & Water Stress: Water Demand 38. Department for Business, E. (2017). Energy and Climate Change Public by the Numbers. Attitudes Tracker – Wave 22.

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 3 39. Department for Business, E. (2018). Energy and Climate Change Public 61. Finlayson, H., Ares, E., Smith, L., & Keep, M. (2016). Shale gas and Attitude Tracker – Wave 25. fracking: Briefing Paper. House of Commons Library.

40. Department for Business, E. (2018). Inclusion of shale gas production 62. Fraser, H. (2017). Review of groundwater monitoring data, KM8 Site, projects in the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project regime. Kirby Misperton. Friends of the Earth.

41. Department for Environment, F. (2018). Potential Air Quality Impacts 63. Gandossi, L. (2013). An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other of Shale Gas Extraction in the UK. formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production. European Commission Joint Research Centre. 42. Department of Health: Government of Western Australia. (2015). Hydraulic fracturing for shale and tight gas in Western Australian 64. Gandossi, L. (2016). State of the art report on waterless stimulation drinking water supply areas: Human Health Risk Assessment. techniques for shale formations. European Commission Joint Research Centre. 43. Eaton, G. (2014). Are we fit to frack? Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. 65. German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources. (2016). and shale gas in Germany – potential and environmental aspects. 44. Energy and Climate Change Committee. (2013). The Impact of Shale Gas on Energy Markets. House of Commons. 66. Godec, M., & Spisto, A. (2016). Economic impacts and framework conditions for potential unconventional gas and oil extraction in the 45. Energy in Depth. (2017). Compendium of studies demonstrating the EU: Case studies of Germany and Poland. European Commission Joint safety and health benefits of fracking. Research Centre. 46. Environment Agency. (2012). Evidence: Review of assessment 67. Goss G., A., & Prosser, C. (2015). Unconventional Wastewater procedures for shale gas well casing installation. Management: A Comparative Review and Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing 47. Environment Agency. (2012). Monitoring and control of fugitive methane Wastewater Management Practices Across Four North American Basins. from unconventional gas operations. Canadian Water Network.

48. Environment Agency. (2014). An Environmental Risk Assessment for 68. Gradient Corporation. (2013). National Human Health Risk Evaluation coal bed methane, coal mine methane and abandoned mine methane for Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Additives. operations in England. 69. Grant, L., & Chisholm, A. (2014). Shale Gas and Water: An independent 49. Environment Agency. (2016). Emissions of methane from abandoned review of shale gas exploration and exploitation in the UK with a particular onshore oil and gas wells: Project summary SC140032. focus on the implications for the water environment. The Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management (CIWEM. 50. Environment Agency. (2016). Oil and Gas Sector 2016. 70. Grant, L., & Chisholm, A. (2016). Shale Gas and Water: An independent 51. Environment Agency. (2017). Environmental performance: sector review of shale gas extraction in the UK and the implications for the strategies: Oil and Gas Sector 2016. water environment. Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental 52. Environment Agency. (2017). Facts about fracking: Environmental controls Management. in England. 71. Green, C., Styles, P., & Baptie, B. (2012). Preese Hall Shale Gas Fracturing: 53. Environment Agency. (2017). Facts about fracking: Managing wastes Review & Recommendations for Induced Seismic Mitigation. from fracking. 72. . (2017). Fracking: What's the evidence? 54. Environment Agency. (2017). Facts about fracking: Protecting water. 73. Griesbach, D., Waterton, J., & Platts, A. (2017). Talking "Fracking": A 55. Environment Agency. (2017). Minimising risks from fluid reinjection Consultation on Unconventional Oil and Gas. Scottish Government. to deep geological formations: Project summary SC150027. 74. Hammack, R., Harbert, W., Sharma, S., Stewart, B., Capo, R., Wall, A., . . . 56. Environment Agency. (n.d.). Onshore Oil & Gas: Consultations. Veloski, G. (2014). An Evaluation of Fracture Growth and Gas/Fluid Retrieved from https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/ Migration as Horizontal Marcellus Shale Gas Wells are Hydraulically consultation_finder/?sort_on=iconsultable_enddate&sort_ Fractured in Greene County, Pennsylvania. Retrieved from EPAct order=descending&advanced=1&tx=&st=&au=&in=&de=.site.onshore-oil- Technical Report Series: https://edx.netl.doe.gov/dataset/an-evaluation- and-gas of-fracture-growth-and-gas-marcellus-shale-gas-wells-greene-county-pa

57. Environment Agency. (n.d.). Onshore oil and gas regulation – information 75. Harrison, G., Parkinson, S., & Mcfarlane, G. (2014). Shale gas and fracking: page. Retrieved from https://consult.environment-agency.gov.uk/ examining the evidence . Environment Agency. onshore-oil-and-gas/onshore-oil-and-gas-regulation-information-page/ 76. Hart, A., Beaglehole, J., & van der Stoep, R. (2016). Public views on the 58. European Parliament: Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2012). research priorities of the Environment Agency about onshore oil and gas. Impact of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Extraction on the Environment 77. Health Protection Scotland. (2016). HPS Website – A Health Impact and on Human Health: Workshop. Assessment of Unconventional Oil and Gas in Scotland: Volume 1 – 59. European Parliament: Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2012). Full Report. Retrieved from https://www.hps.scot.nhs.uk/web-resources- Impacts of Shale Gas Extraction on the Environment and on Human container/a-health-impact-assessment-of-unconventional-oil-and-gas-in- Health – 2012 Update. scotland-volume-1-full-report/

60. Exxon Mobil Corporation. (2014). Unconventional Resources Development 78. Healy, D. (2012). Hydraulic Fracturing or 'Fracking': A Short Summary of – Managing the Risks. Current Knowledge and Potential Environmental Impacts. Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland).

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 4 79. Hirst, N., Seong Khor, C., & Buckle, S. (2013). Shale gas and climate 98. Loveless, S., & Smith, N. (2016). Summary of potential oil and gas change: Briefing paper No 10. Grantham Institute for Climate Change, formations in England for use in groundwater vulnerability assessments. Imperial College London. British Geological Survey.

80. Hoffman, A., Olsson, G., & Lindstrom, A. (2014). Shale Gas and 99. Loveless, S., Lewis, M., Bloomfield, J., Terrington, R., Stuart, M., Ward, R., Hydraulic Fracturing: Framing the Water Issue. Stockholm International & Hart, A. (2018). 3D Groundwater Vulnerability. British Geological Survey. Water Institute. 100. MacKay, D., & Stone, T. (2013). Potential Greenhouse Gas Emissions 81. Hopstaken, K. (2013). Inventory and Analysis of hydraulically fractured Associated with Shale Gas Extraction and Use. Department of Energy wells in the Dutch on- and offshore. Energie Beheer Nederland (EBN). & Climate Change.

82. House of Lords. (2017). Shale Gas – Hansard. Retrieved from 101. Mauter, M., Palmer, V., Tang, Y., & Behrer, A. (2013). The Next Frontier https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2017-03-07/debates/E12BC451-61E0- in United States Shale Gas and Tight Oil Extraction: Strategic Reduction 4EBB-82FB-78F7DC5DD387/ShaleGas of Environmental Impacts. Harvard Kennedy School.

83. House of Lords: Economic Affairs Committee. (2014). The Economic 102. Maxwell, S. (2014). Microseismic Imaging of Hydraulic Fracturing: Impact on UK Energy Policy of Shale Gas and Oil. Improved Engineering of Unconventional Shale Reservoirs. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. 84. Hyland, L., Ladislaw, S., Pumphrey, D., Verrastro, F., & Walton, M. (2013). Realizing the Potential of U.S. Unconventional National Gas. Center for 103. McGlade, C., Pye, S., Watson, J., Bradshaw, M., & Ekins, P. (2016). Strategic & International Studies. The future role of natural gas in the UK. UK Energy Research Centre.

85. IGas Energy plc and Environmental Ltd. (2014). Potential Economic 104. Mckenzie, L. (2017). Oil and Gas Development: Evaluating the Health Impacts of Shale Gas in the Ocean Gateway. AMION Consulting. Implications.

86. Infrastructure for Business. (2013). Getting shale gas working. 105. Middleton, J., Posner, N., Beaussier, A.-L., Ponsford, V., Kidney, D., Raffle, A., . . . Walpole, S. (2015). Health & Fracking: The impacts & opportunity 87. International Energy Agency. (2012). Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas: costs. Medact. World Energy Outlook, Special Report on Unconventional Gas. 106. Mitchell, J., & Mitchell, B. (2016). The Impact of the COP21 Climate 88. Joint Agencies Groundwater Directive Advisory Group. (2017). Change Negotiations on the Oil and Gas Industries Mismatches: Groundwater hazardous substances and non-hazardous pollutants. The Impact of the COP21 Climate Change Negotiations on the Oil and Retrieved from https://wfduk.org/sites/default/files/Media/JAGDAG/2018 Gas Industries. Chatham House. 01 31 Confirmed hazardous substances list_0.pdf 107. Monaghan, A. (2014). The Carboniferous shales of the Midland Valley 89. Joint Committee on Communications Climate Action and Environment. of Scotland: geology and resource estimation. British Geological Survey (2017). Report of the Joint Committee on the Detailed Scrutiny of the for Department of Energy and Climate Change. Prohibition of the Exploration and Extraction of Onshore Petroleum Bill 108. Moore, V., Beresford, A., & Gove, B. (2014). Hydraulic fracturing for shale 2016. Houses of the Oireachtas. gas in the UK: Examining the evidence for potential environmental 90. Jones, C. (2018). The Implications of Fracking in UK Gas Import Substitution. impacts. RSPB. Cardiff Business School. 109. Moss, J., Coram, A., & Blashki, G. (2013). Is fracking good for your health? 91. Kearney, M., & Wilson, R. (2017). Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, The Australia Institute. and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking. National Bureau 110. Muller, E., & Muller, R. (2015). Pointmaker: The Facts about Fugitive of Economic Research. Methane. Centre for Policy Studies.

92. Kibble, A., Cabianca, T., Daraktchieva, Z., Gooding, T., Smithard, J., 111. Muller, E., & Muller, R. (2015). The Facts about Fugitive Methane. Kowalczyk G., & Kamanyire, R. (2014). Review of the Potential Public Centre for Policy Studies. Health Impacts of Exposures to Chemical and Radioactive Pollutants as 112. National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory. (n.d.). Pollutant information: a Result of the Shale Gas Extraction Process. Public Health England. Methane. Retrieved from https://naei.beis.gov.uk/overview/ 93. Kresse, T., Warner, N., Hays, P., Down, A., Vengosh, A., & Jackson, R. pollutants?pollutant_id=3 (2012). Shale Groundwater Quality and Geochemistry in the Fayetteville 113. National Research Council. (2013). Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Shale Gas – Production Area, North-Central Arkansas, 2011. Technologies. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report. 114. New Brunswick Commission on Hydraulic Fracturing. (2016). 94. Krupnik, A., Gordon, H., & Olmstead, S. (2013). Pathways to Dialogue: The Findings – Volume 1. What the Experts Say about the Environmental Risks of Shale Gas 115. O'Hara, S., Humphrey, M., Andersson-Hudson, J., & Knight, W. (2016). Development. Resources for the Future. Public Perceptions of Shale Gas in the UK: From Positive to Negative. 95. Le Fevre, C. (2017). Methane Emissions: from blind spot to spotlight. 116. Oil & Gas Authority. (2013). Managing onshore induced seismicity. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. 117. Oil & Gas Authority. (2017). UK Oil and Gas Reserves and Resources: as at 96. Limited, G. (2012). Preese Hall Shale Gas Fracturing: Review & end 2016. Recommendations for Induced Seismic Mitigation: GeoScience Comments. 118. Oil & Gas Authority. (2018). Wells Insight Report 2018. 97. Long, J., Birkholzer, J., Feinstein, L., Aines, R., Livermore, L., Dieterich, 119. Pandurangan, R., Kasperczyk, D., Kear, J., & Chen, Z. (2018). Water J., & Mckone, T. (2015). An Independent Scientific Assessment of Well contamination risk assessment on hydraulic fracturing in unconventional Stimulation in California Summary Report An Examination of Hydraulic gas extraction. CSIRO, Australia. Fracturing and Acid Stimulations in the Oil and Gas Industry.

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 5 120. Parkhill, K., Demski, C., Butler, C., Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2013). 140. Styles, P. (2018). Fracking and Historic Coal Mining: Their relationship Transforming the UK Energy System : Public Values, Attitudes and and should they coincide? Acceptability – Synthesis Report. UK Energy Research Centre. 141. Task Force on Shale Gas. (2015). The Economic Impacts of a UK Shale 121. Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology. (2013). UK Shale Gas Gas Industry. Potential. House of Parliament. 142. Taylor, O., Lester, A., & Lee III, T. (2015). Unconventional Hydrocarbon 122. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Development Hazards Within The Central United States: Report 1. (2018). Shale Gas Monitoring Report. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.

123. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. (2015). 2015 143. The Academy of Medicine, E. (2017). Environmental and Community Air Emissions Inventory for Unconventional Natural Gas Operations. Impacts of Shale Development in Highlights from the TAMEST Retrieved from https://www.ahs.dep.pa.gov/NewsRoomPublic/ Shale Task Force Report. SearchResults.aspx?id=21283&typeid=1 144. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, a. (2018). Onshore 124. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. (2016). Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and 2016 Oil and Gas Annual Report. Innovations in Managing Risk – Day 2. National Academies Press.

125. Pepper, R., Andersen, A., Ashworth, P., Beck, V., Hart, B., Jones, D., 145. The Network for Police Monitoring. (2017). Protecting the Planet is Not & Smith, R. (2018). Scientific Inquiry into Hydraulic Fracturing in the a Crime: A NETPOL Report on the Policing of Anti-fracking Protests Northern Territory: Final Report. Northern Territory Government. during 2017. NETPOL.

126. Pérez Ballesta P., F. (2018). Unconventional oil and gas development: 146. The Royal Society of Edinburgh. (2015). Options for Scotland's Gas Future. Evaluation of selected hydrocarbons in the ambient air of three basins 147. The Scottish Government. (2014). Independent Expert Scientific Panel – in the United States by means of diffusive sampling measurements. Report on Unconventional Oil and Gas. European Commission Joint Research Centre. 148. Third Energy. (2017). Environmental Monitoring Plan: Kirby Misperton. 127. Permian Basin Petroleum Association, Texas Oil and Gas Association, & McDonald Observatory. (2017). Recommended Lighting Practices . 149. TNS BMRB. (2014). Public engagement with shale gas and oil: A report on findings from public dialogue workshops. 128. Priestley, S. (2018). Shale gas and fracking: Briefing Paper. House of Commons Library. 150. Trade Unions for Energy Democracy. (2014). Global Shale Gas and the Anti-Fracking Movement: Developing Union Perspectives 129. Ratledge, N., Zachary, L., Wickman, C., Cunningham, B., & Egorenkov, and Approaches. A. (2017). Impacts of Unconventional Oil and Gas Booms on Public Education: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Six Producing States. 151. U.S. Department of Energy. (2015). Report on the Multiagency Collaboration on Unconventional Oil and Gas Research. 130. Regeneris Consulting, Cardiff University, & AMEC. (2015). Socio-economic Impact of Unconventional Gas in Wales . Welsh Government. 152. U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming. (2015). Motion for Preliminary Injunction. 131. Reible, D., & Davies, R. (2015). Joint US-UK Workshop on Improving the Understanding of the Potential Environmental Impacts Associated with 153. U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2017). U.S. Energy-Related Unconventional Hydrocarbons. Emissions, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/ environment/emissions/carbon/archive/2016/ 132. Reig, P., Luo, T., Proctor, J., & Proctor, J. (2014). Global Shale Gas Development: Water Availability and Business Risks. World Resources 154. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2013). Technically Recoverable Institute. Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. 133. Richards, P., Fell, M., & Smith, L. (2013). Shale gas and fracking: Briefing Paper. 155. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Data from the FracFocus Chemical Disclosure Registry 134. Richardson, N., Gottlieb, M., Krupnik, A., & Wiseman, H. (2013). 1.0. Office of Research and Development. The State of State Shale Gas Regulation. Resources for the Future. 156. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2015). Assessment of the 135. Richenderfer, J., Wagner, B., Shank, M., Balay, J., Hintz, D., Hoffman, Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking J., & Zimmerman, J. (2016). Water Use Associated with Natural Gas Water Resources. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Shale Development: An Assessment of Activities Managed by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission Susquehanna River Basin 157. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). GHGRP Industrial Profiles: Commission – July 2008 through December 2013. Susquehanna Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2011-2016 . River Basin Commission. 158. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil 136. Roche, C., & Simon, A. (2017). Can the climate afford Europe's gas and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking addiction? Friends of the Earth Europe. Water Resources in the United States. Executive Summary. Office of Research and Development. 137. Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Corner, A., Arnold, A., Bohm, G., & Tvinnereim, E. (2017). European Perceptions of Climate Change: Topline 159. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Greenhouse Gas findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Reporting Program (GHGRP) Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems.

138. Stevens, P. (2012). The 'Shale Gas Revolution': Developments and 160. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Petroleum and Natural Changes. Chatham House. Gas Systems: 2011-2016. GHGRP Industrial Profiles.

139. Stuart, M. (2012). Potential groundwater impact from exploitation 161. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). EPA Facility Level GHG of shale gas in the UK. British Geological Survey. Emissions Data. Retrieved from https://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do#

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 6 162. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2012). Oil and Gas: Information 171. Wasylishen, R., & Fulton, S. (2012). Reuse of Flowback & Produced Water on Shale Resources, Development, and Environmental and Public for Hydraulic Fracturing in Tight Oil. Health Risks. 172. Weible, C., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (2016). Policy Debates 163. UK Energy Research Centre. (2012). A Review of Regional and on Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparing Coalition Politics in North America Global Estimates of Unconventional Gas Resources. Retrieved from and Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://ukerc.ac.uk/publications/a-review-of-regional-and-global- 173. Welsh Government. (2018). Petroleum Extraction Policy in Wales: estimates-of-unconventional-gas-resources/ Consultation Document. 164. UK Government Legislation. (2015). Infrastructure Act 2015: Section 50. 174. White, E., Fell, M., & Smith, L. (2015). Shale gas and fracking: Briefing Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/7/section/50/ Paper. House of Commons Library. enacted 175. Williamson, J., Evans, D., & House, M. (2017). First results of studies 165. UK Onshore Oil and Gas. (2014). UKOOG Fit to Frack response. on the separation of the Bowland-Hodder shale unit from coal mining 166. UK Onshore Oil and Gas. (2016). UK onshore oil and gas industry activity in the East Midlands. British Geological Survey. responds to Medact report. Retrieved from http://www.ukoog.org.uk/ 176. Wilson, J., & Schwank, J. (2013). Hydraulic Fracturing in the State of about-ukoog/press-releases/189-uk-onshore-oil-and-gas-industry- Michigan: The Application of Hydraulic Fracturing Technologies to responds-to-medact-report Michigan Oil and Gas Recovery. University of Michigan. 167. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2018). 177. Wilson, J., & Schwank, J. (2013). The Application of Hydraulic Fracturing Commodities at a Glance: Special Issue on Shale Gas. Technologies to Michigan Oil and Gas Recovery. University of Michigan. 168. Verrastro, F., Ladislaw, S., Sieminski, A., & Stanley, A. (2017). Impacts of 178. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. (2016). Pavillion, Onshore Oil and Gas Development: Managing Societal and Environmental Wyoming Area Domestic Water Wells Final Report and Palatability Study. Risks. Center for Strategic & International Studies. 179. YouGov. (2017). Fracking. Friends of the Earth. 169. Ward, H., & Nicol, A.-M. (2016). Understanding the Public Health Implications Concerning Shale Gas Production and Hydraulic 180. Zijp, M., Nelskamp, S., & Doornenbal, J. (2017). Resource estimation of Fracturing. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health. shale gas and shale oil in Europe. Report T7b of the EUOGA study (EU Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment). European Commission Joint 170. Ward, R., Allen, G., Baptie, B., Bateson, L., Bell, R., Butcher, A., & Research Centre to GEUS. Wasikiewicz, J. (2018). Preliminary assessment of the environmental baseline in the Fylde, Lancashire. British Geological Survey Open Report.

The text of this work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. The license is available at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Issued: March 2021 DES7236_2 © The Royal Society

BIBLIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF GLOBAL SHALE GAS RESEARCH 2009 – 2018: GREY LITERATURE LIST 7