DOCSLIB.ORG

Getting Shale Gas Working Infrastructure for Business 2013 #6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Getting Shale Gas Working Infrastructure for Business 2013 #6 Infrastructure for Business Getting shale gas working Infrastructure for Business 2013 #6 2 Getting shale gas working About the report On 21 September 2012, the IoD published a report, Britain’s Shale Gas Potential,1 which concluded that shale gas has the potential to create jobs, generate tax revenues, reduce imports, accelerate the move away from coal and support the growth of renewables. Although exploration is still at an early phase, the UK has substantial quantities of shale gas in place that have the potential to support the creation of an important new industry in parts of the country that need it most. The report also detailed the results of a survey of over 1,000 IoD members, which found that businesses are in favour of careful, well-regulated shale gas development in the UK. On 13 December 2012, the Government lifted the temporary moratorium on exploratory hydraulic fracturing, the technique used for extracting shale gas, and announced new seismic controls.2 Following the lifting of the moratorium, the IoD has studied in detail how a new shale gas industry could develop. This report, which has been sponsored by Cuadrilla Resources Ltd, examines the history of comparable developments; the economic potential of a UK shale gas industry, focusing on Lancashire as an example of a part of the UK that could gain substantially; and the main barriers to its establishment and growth. It also investigates the partnerships that will need to be set up between the industry, its supply chain, local and national government, education and training institutions, and communities to ensure that local businesses, and local people, benefi t from exploration and production. Written by Corin Taylor, Senior Economic Adviser at the Institute of Directors. Chapter 2 written by Dan Lewis, Chief Executive of Future Energy Strategies (www.future-es.com) and Energy Policy Adviser to the IoD. Foreword by Dan Byles MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Unconventional Oil & Gas and member of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee. Designed by Jen Cogan Front cover image kindly supplied by Shell 3 Infrastructure for Business 2013 #6 Scope of the report This report examines the potential of a shale gas industry in the UK, and how to overcome the barriers to its establishment and growth. In order to remain focused, this report does not examine the safety of hydraulic fracturing, either in the UK or overseas. Other expert bodies have looked into the process in detail, including the Royal Society,3 the International Energy Agency,4 the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee5 and the report commissioned by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) on seismic issues.6 We support their calls for strong regulation of all aspects of the drilling and hydraulic fracturing process, and also note the exploration and appraisal guidelines issued recently by the UK Onshore Operators Group (UKOOG).7 For the same reason, this report concentrates on the potential of shale gas. Other unconventional hydrocarbon resources in the UK, including unconventional oil8 and coal-bed methane, also have considerable potential, and they will be examined in future publications. Finally, there are potentially large offshore shale gas resources, but as extraction would be considerably more expensive, we focus on the potential of onshore shale gas. Conversions In this report, for simplicity and consistency, we have tended to convert gas measurements into billion cubic feet (bcf) or trillion cubic feet (tcf). A helpful converter for many of the various energy measures can be found here: http://www.bp.com/conversionfactors.jsp 4 Getting shale gas working Acknowledgements This report has been sponsored by Cuadrilla Resources Ltd. Its purpose is to: ● Study and apply the lessons of previous energy developments; ● Investigate the economic impacts of potential UK shale gas production at scale; ● Work out the practical steps, for both government and the private sector, to overcome the barriers to the establishment and growth of a UK shale gas industry. This report represents the independent assessment of the IoD. The IoD is exclusively responsible for this report and its content, analysis and conclusions. We would like to thank the numerous people we have met and spoken to during the course of the research for this report, including from national and local government agencies, academic institutions, business development bodies, representative bodies of the UK offshore and onshore oil and gas industry, exploration and production companies, supply chain partners, heavy industry, investors, and other experts. We are also grateful to the Members of Parliament who have taken the time to share their thoughts and concerns. We are also very grateful to the many people who took the time to review earlier drafts of this report, provide valuable feedback and point out errors. All conclusions and remaining errors are ours alone. We would also like to extend particular thanks to Graham Dean, Director of Reach Coal Seam Gas Limited, for his assistance with the calculations presented in Chapter 4. All conclusions and any errors are ours alone. We are also very grateful to CambridgeIP for supplying the data and analysis in the innovation section of Chapter 3, although it should not be taken necessarily to imply endorsement of the wider report on the part of CambridgeIP. Finally, we would like to thank Dan Byles MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Unconventional Oil & Gas and member of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee, for writing the foreword to this report and for his work, on behalf of both the APPG and the Select Committee, to ensure that the UK debate around shale gas is carried out in a level- headed way. 5 Infrastructure for Business 2013 #6 Contents FOREWORD _________________________________________________ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ________________________________________ 9 INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________ 22 1. CONTEXT ________________________________________________ 25 1.1 Energy _________________________________________________ 25 1.2 Tax____________________________________________________28 1.3 Jobs ___________________________________________________29 2. HISTORICAL NARRATIVES ___________________________________ 35 2.1 Lancashire ______________________________________________ 35 2.2 Aberdeen _______________________________________________38 2.3 Wytch Farm _____________________________________________ 41 2.4 The US _________________________________________________44 3. ENERGY DEVELOPMENTS IN DETAIL __________________________ 51 3.1 UK oil and gas ____________________________________________ 51 3.2 US shale gas _____________________________________________ 75 3.3 Onshore wind and nuclear in brief ____________________________ 103 3.4 Key lessons ____________________________________________ 105 4. SHALE GAS POTENTIAL ___________________________________109 4.1 Overview of shale gas benefits _______________________________109 4.2 UK shale gas resources ____________________________________ 111 4.3 Advantages ____________________________________________ 114 4.4 What could shale gas production potentially look like? _____________ 115 5. BARRIERS _______________________________________________ 135 5.1 Overview of barriers ______________________________________ 135 5.2 Infrastructure, resources and equipment _______________________ 137 5.3 Skills and supply chain ____________________________________ 143 5.4 Finance _______________________________________________ 147 5.5 Regulation _____________________________________________ 151 5.6 Reputation ____________________________________________ 156 6. RECOMMENDATIONS _____________________________________161 6.1 Overcoming the exploration hurdle ___________________________ 161 6.2 Developing a shale gas industry _____________________________ 162 ENDNotes ________________________________________________169 6 Getting shale gas working Foreword By Dan Byles MP, Chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Unconventional Oil & Gas, and member of the Energy and Climate Change Select Committee Unconventional gas is simply natural gas. There is nothing unusual or mysterious about the product. It is the gas we already use to generate 28% of our electricity and heat 83% of our homes. Much of the controversy around shale gas comes, not from the product, but from the extraction technique used to access that gas. Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is widely and mistakenly seen as a new technology and some fear the potential impact of fracking for shale gas on their local environment. In fact hydraulic fracturing has been used commercially in the US since 1949, and many people might be surprised to learn that around 200 onshore wells have already been fracked in the UK for conventional gas extraction – out of some 2,000 onshore wells in total. Worldwide, the total is around 1.1 million. The safety record of fracking is outside the scope of this report, but there is a growing library of research from reputable expert organisations such as the Royal Society, the International Energy Agency, the Royal Academy of Engineering and others looking at the safety and regulatory issues. The weight of evidence so far suggests that unconventional gas can be developed safely with effective regulation, and I have no doubt that we will see further and more detailed work in this area. The UK now has the opportunity to marry up our gold standard oil and gas regulatory experience from the North Sea with lessons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM of the STATE of ILLINOIS 2815 West Washington Street I P.O
    Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Performed as Special Assistant Auditors for the Auditor General, State of Illinois Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents Schedule Page(s) System Officials 1 Management Assertion Letter 2 Compliance Report Summary 3 Independent Accountant’s Report on State Compliance, on Internal Control over Compliance, and on Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes 4 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 8 Schedule of Findings Current Findings – State Compliance 10 Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes Fiscal Schedules and Analysis Schedule of Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 1 13 Comparative Schedules of Net Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 2 15 Comparative Schedule of Revenues and Expenses 3 17 Schedule of Administrative Expenses 4 18 Schedule of Changes in Property and Equipment 5 19 Schedule of Investment Portfolio 6 20 Schedule of Investment Manager and Custodian Fees 7 21 Analysis of Operations (Unaudited) Analysis of Operations (Functions and Planning) 30 Progress in Funding the System 34 Analysis of Significant Variations in Revenues and Expenses 36 Analysis of Significant Variations in Administrative Expenses 37 Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Tower Resources plc 5 Charterhouse Square London EC1M 6PX Tel +44 20 7253 6639 Email [email protected] www.towerresources.co.uk Annual Report 2014 Tower Resources plc Annual Report 2014 57 Additional Information Corporate Directory Registered Company Name Professional Advisers Tower Resources PLC Strategic Report Nominated Adviser and Broker At a Glance 1 Directors Peel Hunt LLP Building a high impact African portfolio 2 Jeremy Asher Chairman Moor House 2014 Events 4 Graeme Thomson Chief Executive Officer 120 London Wall Chairman and Chief Executive’s Joint Statement 6 Peter Blakey Non-executive Director London EC2Y 5ET Market Overview 7 Philip Swatman Senior Independent 2014 and Onwards 8 Non-executive Director Joint Broker Operational Review: Peter Taylor Non-executive Director GMP Securities Europe LLP Cameroon 10 First Floor, Stratton House Zambia 11 Company Secretary 5 Stratton Street South Africa 12 Andrew Smith London W1J 8LA Namibia 13 Kenya 15 Corporate Address Solicitors Sahawari Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) 16 Tower Resources PLC Watson Farley & Williams LLP New Ventures 17 5 Charterhouse Square 15 Appold Street Financial Review 18 London EC1M 6PX London EC2Y 2HB Business Risks 19 Registered Office Group Auditors Corporate Governance One America Square UHY Hacker Young LLP Board of Directors 20 Crosswall 4 Thomas More Square Senior Management 22 London EC2N 3SG London E1W 1YW Audit Committee Report 24 Remuneration Committee Report 26 Company Number Registrars Communications with Shareholders 27
    [Show full text]
  • Unconventional Gas and Oil in North America Page 1 of 24
    Unconventional gas and oil in North America This publication aims to provide insight into the impacts of the North American 'shale revolution' on US energy markets and global energy flows. The main economic, environmental and climate impacts are highlighted. Although the North American experience can serve as a model for shale gas and tight oil development elsewhere, the document does not explicitly address the potential of other regions. Manuscript completed in June 2014. Disclaimer and copyright This publication does not necessarily represent the views of the author or the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation of this document for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. © European Union, 2014. Photo credits: © Trueffelpix / Fotolia (cover page), © bilderzwerg / Fotolia (figure 2) [email protected] http://www.eprs.ep.parl.union.eu (intranet) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank (internet) http://epthinktank.eu (blog) Unconventional gas and oil in North America Page 1 of 24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 'shale revolution' Over the past decade, the United States and Canada have experienced spectacular growth in the production of unconventional fossil fuels, notably shale gas and tight oil, thanks to technological innovations such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Economic impacts This new supply of energy has led to falling gas prices and a reduction of energy imports. Low gas prices have benefitted households and industry, especially steel production, fertilisers, plastics and basic petrochemicals. The production of tight oil is costly, so that a high oil price is required to make it economically viable.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocational Education and Fisheries S, N. Dwivedi & V. Ravindranathan
    Vocational education and fisheries Item Type article Authors Dwivedi, S.N.; Ravindranathan, V. Download date 24/09/2021 18:45:18 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/31676 Journal of the Indian Fisheries Association 8+9, 1978-79, 65-70 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND FISHERIES S, N. DWIVEDI & V. RAVINDRANATHAN Central Institute of Fisheries Education Versova, Bombay-400 067. ABSTRACT The knowledge and skill of the poople are important tools for the development of natural resources and for the prosperty of any country. The quality of education is judged not only from the inquistiveness and knowiedge it can impart but also from it's usefulees in meeting the urgent economic problems of the country. Vocational Courses in fisheries are offered in four states. The technologies in fisheries developed offer good scope for Vocational training for self employment. There is an urgent need to have radical revision of the course content to make the students vocationaliy competent. FISHERIES EDUCATION — STATE OF ART : Recognising the need to study, assess and develop the fishery resources of the country, Govt. of India established the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) Cochin; Central Inland Fisheries Risearch Institute (CIFRI) Barrackpore, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology (CIFI) Cochin and Deep Sea Fishing Station, Bombay soon after the Independence. Since then, the fish production trend in the country has been encouraing. The annual fish production has increased from 0.5 million tons in 1950, to 2.6 million tons in 1983. Although the rate of increase has been fairly good, the per capita consumption of fish, even now, is less than 5 kg/yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairn India Limited
    RED HERRING PROSPECTUS Please read Section 60B of the Companies Act, 1956 Dated 27 November, 2006 100% Book Built Issue CAIRN INDIA LIMITED (Incorporated as a public limited company under the Companies Act, 1956 on 21 August, 2006) The registered office of the Company was changed from Lentin Chambers, 3rd Floor, Dalal Street, Fort, Mumbai 400 023 to 401 Dalamal Towers, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021, India, its current registered office on 12 October, 2006 Tel: +(91) (22) 2287 2001; Fax: +91 (22) 2287 2002 Principal Business Office: 3rd and 4th Floor, Orchid Plaza, Suncity, Sector 54, Gurgaon, 122 002 Tel: +(91) (124) 414 1360; Fax: +(91) (124) 288 9320; Website: www.cairnindia.com Contact Person: Preeti Chheda; E-mail: [email protected] PUBLIC ISSUE OF 328,799,675 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH (‘‘EQUITY SHARES’’) FOR CASH AT A PRICE OF RS. [ɀ] PER EQUITY SHARE OF CAIRN INDIA LIMITED (THE ‘‘COMPANY’’) AGGREGATING TO RS. [ɀ] (THE ‘‘ISSUE’’). THERE WILL ALSO BE A GREEN SHOE OPTION OF UP TO 49,319,951 EQUITY SHARES FOR CASH AT A PRICE OF RS. [ɀ] PER EQUITY SHARE AGGREGATING TO RS. [ɀ] (THE ‘‘GREEN SHOE OPTION’’). THE ISSUE AND THE GREEN SHOE OPTION, IF EXERCISED IN FULL, WILL AGGREGATE TO 378,119,626 EQUITY SHARES AMOUNTING TO RS. [ɀ]. THE ISSUE WILL CONSTITUTE 18.63% OF THE FULLY DILUTED POST-ISSUE EQUITY SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY ASSUMING THAT THE GREEN SHOE OPTION IS NOT EXERCISED AND 20.84% ASSUMING THAT THE GREEN SHOE OPTION IS EXERCISED IN FULL.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development
    5th Edition Secure Fuels from Domestic Resources ______________________________________________________________________________ Profiles of Companies Engaged in Domestic Oil Shale and Tar Sands Resource and Technology Development Prepared by INTEK, Inc. For the U.S. Department of Energy • Office of Petroleum Reserves Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves Fifth Edition: September 2011 Note to Readers Regarding the Revised Edition (September 2011) This report was originally prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy in June 2007. The report and its contents have since been revised and updated to reflect changes and progress that have occurred in the domestic oil shale and tar sands industries since the first release and to include profiles of additional companies engaged in oil shale and tar sands resource and technology development. Each of the companies profiled in the original report has been extended the opportunity to update its profile to reflect progress, current activities and future plans. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by INTEK, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Petroleum Reserves, Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves (DOE/NPOSR) as a part of the AOC Petroleum Support Services, LLC (AOC- PSS) Contract Number DE-FE0000175 (Task 30). Mr. Khosrow Biglarbigi of INTEK, Inc. served as the Project Manager. AOC-PSS and INTEK, Inc. wish to acknowledge the efforts of representatives of the companies that provided information, drafted revised or reviewed company profiles, or addressed technical issues associated with their companies, technologies, and project efforts. Special recognition is also due to those who directly performed the work on this report. Mr. Peter M. Crawford, Director at INTEK, Inc., served as the principal author of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Speech of I.I. Sechin on the Energy Panel
    St. Petersburg International Economic Forum BUILDING THE AGENDA OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ENERGY PANEL World Energy in Search of Balance Thesis for the speech of I. Sechin Golden Era or Energy: Protectionism, Market or Manual Control? Saint Petersburg June 6, 2019 1 Dear participants and guests of the Forum! I am very happy to welcome all the guests who are participating in our meeting today and to express confidence in very fruitful nature of the forthcoming debates. I would like to particularly acknowledge the participation of the Minister of Energy of the Russian Federation Alexander Novak, the Heads of our esteemed strategic shareholders - Robert Dudley from BP, Qatar’s Finance Minister Al Emadi and the Head of Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) Mister Mansoor Ebrahim Al Mahmoud, the Heads of our partner organizations, the Head of the China National Petroleum Corporation Van Ilin, the Head of Baker Hughes Lorenzo Simonelli, the Head of Glencore Ivan Glasenberg, the Head of DeGolyer John Wallace, the Head of ExxonMobil Neil Duffin, the Head of Equinor Eldar Saetre, the Head of Trafigura Jeremy Weir, the Head of Vitol Russell Hardy, the Head of Gunvor Torbjorn Tornqvist, and the representative delegation from Venezuela, the Ministers of Oil of Angola, Iraq, the ambassadors of Portugal, India, Mozambique, Qatar and Venezuela, the Heads of the Russian regions. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to our moderators, Doctor Nobuo Tanaka and Evgeny Primakov and to all the dear partners and the guests of the Forum. The discussion during the SPIEF is being held under the sustainable development agenda, but we are having it in a very difficult period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation Management in Seafood Industry Sector
    Development of Innovation Capabilities in the New Zealand Seafood Industry Sector Andrew Jeffs Principal Scientist, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 109-695, Auckland, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Shantha Liyanage Associate Professor, Business School, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Abstract: Most seafood industries around the world are founded on wild capture fisheries which have been facing a static or declining resource base due to over exploitation. Achieving growth with this restraint is a challenge that seafood enterprises have struggled with globally for more than 20 years. Innovation efforts in this industry have focused on developing new sources of raw material, increasing financial returns through value-adding, increased efficiency of production and management integration. An early change in the management regime for wild fish stocks is identified as the key factor in encouraging innovation in the New Zealand seafood industry. The greater certainty in raw material supply provided by the management regime has enabled seafood enterprises to shift their attention from competing to secure sufficient raw material toward increasing their returns from the raw materials they know will be available to them. This paper examines the dynamics of innovation capability building and provides management directions for enhancing innovation capability in this industry. Overall, it is hoped that this study may help to act as an exemplar for encouraging innovation in other national or regional seafood industries, and for other industries based on renewable natural resources. Keywords: seafood; innovation; Quota Management System; innovation capability, New Zealand; aquaculture; biotechnology; national innovation system.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies
    The UK Innovation Systems for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Final Report A report to the DTI Renewable Energy Development & Deployment Team June 2003 Imperial College London Centre for Energy Policy and Technology & E4tech Consulting ii Executive summary Background and approach This report considers how innovation systems in the UK work for a range of new and renewable energy technologies. It uses a broad definition of 'innovation' - to include all the stages and activities required to exploit new ideas, develop new and improved products, and deliver them to end users. The study assesses the diversity of influences that affect innovation, and the extent to which they support or inhibit the development and commercialisation of innovative new technologies in the UK. The innovation process for six new and renewable energy sectors is analysed: • Wind (onshore and offshore) • Marine (wave and tidal stream) • Solar PV • Biomass • Hydrogen from renewables • District and micro-CHP In order to understand innovation better, the report takes a systems approach, and a generic model of the innovation system is developed and used to explore each case. The systems approach has its origins in the international literature on innovation. The organising principles are twofold: • The stages of innovation. Innovation proceeds through a series of stages, from basic R&D to commercialisation – but these are interlinked, and there is no necessity for all innovations to go through each and every stage. The stages are defined as follows: Basic and applied R&D includes both ‘blue skies’ science and engineering/application focused research respectively; Demonstration from prototypes to the point where full scale working devices are installed in small numbers; Pre-commercial captures the move from the first few multiples of units to much larger scale installation for the first time; Supported commercial is the stage where technologies are rolled out in large numbers, given generic support measures; Commercial technologies can compete unsupported within the broad regulatory framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Bilag 6. Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2017 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten. Rækkeetiketter Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine Development Co Black Mountain Resources LLC Bluff Spur Coal Corp Boone Energy Co Bull Mountain Mining Corp Central Penn Energy Co Inc Central West Virginia Energy Co Clear Fork Coal Co CoalSolv LLC Cobra Natural Resources LLC Crystal Fuels Co Cumberland Resources Corp Dehue Coal Co Delbarton Mining Co Douglas Pocahontas Coal Corp Duchess Coal Co Duncan Fork Coal Co Eagle Energy Inc/US Elk Run Coal Co Inc Exeter Coal Corp Foglesong Energy Co Foundation Coal
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Offshore Employee Consultative Forum Meeting
    Minutes of Offshore Employee Consultative Forum Meeting Start Time 13:00 End Time 14:35 Attendees Dave Ward – Senior Manager (DW) Alison Young – Senior P&O Manager (AY) Craig Shanaghey –President (CS) Catherine Liebnitz – P&O Vice President (CL) Stuart Smith – Operations Director (SS) Derek Donald – Senior HSE Manager (DD) Aimee Ironside – Marketing and Communications Manager (AI) Rebekah Sim – P&O Coordinator (Minute Taker (RS) Employee Reps (ER): John Donnelly – BP contract Tristan Gawn – Dana contract David Dunsmore – Premier contract James Parker – Premier contract Nev Cullen – Shell OMS contract Jonny Peek – Shell OMS contract John Reid – TAQA contract Bob Wilson – TAQA contract Stephen Heaney – Retained contract Referenced Jennifer Reaich – Logistics Coordinator (JR) Fiona Reeks – P&O Business Partner These notes capture the key points. They are not a verbatim account of the meeting. Initials Detail of Discussion AY Thanked everyone for attending today. Introduced herself as Senior P&O Manager and confirmed that there were senior management on the call and CS would also be joining the call to deliver a business update. Advised that she will do a roll call and asked all reps to advise what position they worked in and on what contract and asset: David Dunsmore – CRO on Solan – Premier Contract James Parker – Rotating Equipment Technician on Balmoral – Premier Contract John Reid – Plater on the North Cormorant – TAQA Contract Jonny Peek – Lead Instrument Technician on Nelson – Shell Contract Stephen Heaney – Pipefitter on the Retained Contract Tristan Gawn – Marine Services Team Lead on Triton – Dana Contract Nev Cullen – Technician on Shearwater – Shell Contract John Donnelly – Pipefitter on ETAP – BP Contract Bob Wilson – Material Controller – TAQA Contract AY advised that those attending from Wood are DW – Senior Manager for the Aberdeen Engineering HUB and IRS Fabrication Shop.
    [Show full text]