An Evolving Polarity (Chapter 1)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Artificial and the Natural Dibner Institute in the History of Science and Technology Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology George Smith, general editor Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and William R. Newman, editors, The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity Jed Z. Buchwald and I. Bernard Cohen, editors, Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy Jed Z. Buchwald and Andrew Warwick, editors, Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysics Geo¤rey Cantor and Sally Shuttleworth, editors, Science Serialized: Representations of the Sciences in Nineteenth-Century Periodicals Michael Friedman and Alfred Nordmann, editors, The Kantian Legacy in Nineteenth- Century Science Anthony Grafton and Nancy Siraisi, editors, Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Renaissance Europe J. P. Hogendijk and A. I. Sabra, editors, The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives Frederic L. Holmes and Trevor H. Levere, editors, Instruments and Experimentation in the History of Chemistry Agatha C. Hughes and Thomas P. Hughes, editors, Systems, Experts, and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After Manfred D. Laubichler and Jane Maienschein, editors, From Embryology to Evo-Devo Brett D. Steele and Tamera Dorland, editors, The Heirs of Archimedes: Science and the Art of War through the Age of Enlightenment N. L. Swerdlow, editor, Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination The Artificial and the Natural An Evolving Polarity edited by Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and William R. Newman The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. For information about special quantity discounts, please e-mail special_sales@ mitpress.mit.edu This book was set in Bembo on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The artificial and the natural : an evolving polarity / edited by Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent and William R. Newman. p. cm. — (Dibner institute studies in the history of science and technology) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-02620-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Science—Europe—History. 2. Science—Philosophy—History. 3. Philosophy, European—History. 4. Science, Medieval. I. Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. II. Newman, William R. Q127 .E8A78 2007 501—dc22 2007001896 10987654321 Index Adam and Eve, 275 Alfonso of Aragon, 196 Adriani, Marcello Vircilio, 189 Alfred of Sareshal, 117 Ægidius Romanus, 141 Amerbach cabinet, 211 Africa, 198 America (de Bry), 198 Age of the Marvelous,211 Andreae, Johann Valentin, 15, 215–216 Agnellus, 37 Animal Chemistry (Brock), 283 Agriculture, 2, 189 Antigone (Sophocles), 78–79 Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius, 15, 200– Antiphon, 30–31, 78–79 201, 209n59 Apollonius of Tyana, 140 Aksay, Ilian, 304 Architectura, De (Vitruvius), 197 Alberti, Leon Battista, 14, 205nn30, 31, Archytas, 140 209n61 Arcimboldo, Giuseppe, 13–14 engineering and, 195–196 Baldini and, 171–172 sculpture and, 192–193, 206nn32–35 Comanini and, 149–174 Albertus Magnus, 12, 192 composite heads of, 153, 155 alchemy and, 119–126, 131n33 criticism of, 156 Aristotelianism and, 141–142 dreams and, 154 demons and, 119–124 fantasy and, 152–157, 160 Alchemy, 4–5, 13, 275, 300 Figino and, 167, 172 Albertus Magnus and, 119–126, Fontana and, 151, 155–156 131n33 German work of, 163–165 Avicenna and, 110–121, 127, 275–276 grotesqueness and, 155–156 demons and, 109–127 hybrids and, 151, 156–157 European medieval age and, 109–127 icastic imitation and, 153 Islamic world and, 109 Italian works of, 164 Kramer and, 110–117 Lombardy and, 167, 170 magic and, 119–127, 129n7 Mannerism and, 151–152 plastick principle and, 277 nature studies of, 159–165, 170 as scholarly discipline, 109–110 Padovano and, 157, 160 Sprenger and, 110–117 poetry and, 149–151, 172–173 Thomas Aquinas and, 111–118, 124– reversible images of, 165–170 126, 132nn39, 40, 276 Aristotle, 13, 36, 38, 171, 293–294 transmutation and, 109–110, 113–116, Cartesian revisions and, 142–145 128n2, 129n13 circle and, 80–85, 92–93, 105n60 as witchcraft, 110–117 Comanini and, 149 Aldrovandi,Ulisse,157,212–213 double four-causes theory and, 54–57 Index 318 Aristotle (cont.) subordinate, 139–140 Hippocratics and, 26, 44n16 superficial, 138–139 homunculus discussion and, 5–6 surrealism and, 155–156 Jesuits and, 135–142 techne and, 21–28 mathematicsand,80–85,90–93 technical, 38–42 maximal principle and, 62–63 theaters of, 213–214 mechanics and, 4, 12, 68–86, 90–94, trompe l’oeil techniques and, 7–8, 10 135–145 utopian imagination and, 185–197 mimetic art and, 51–64 vivisection and, 32–38 pepsis and, 73 Artes (Celsus), 33 physis and, 39–40 Artificial on pleasure, 54–63 conceptual issues and, 9–10 Spinoza and, 226 conflicting perspectives and, 8–9 subordinate sciences and, 91–93 defining, 1–3 techne and, 39–40 indistinct boundaries and, 1–5 Arnoldus Saxo, 109 limiting cases and, 5–6 Arriaga, Roderigo, 138, 142 relationships and, 5–8 Ars combinatoria (Ho¤mann), 300 Artificial intelligence (AI), 9 Ars Poetica (Horace), 154 Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 241, Art, 1–2, 313–314 263 alchemists and, 109–127 Artificial life, 16–17, 240 Aristotle and, 4–6 animal machinery and, 242 concealing/revealing semiotics and, automata and, 13, 16–17, 188, 201, 28–32 242–265 Dada and, 155 emergence of, 241–242 divine, 143–144 materialists and, 242 fine, 9–10 moral issues and, 264–265 Hippocratics and, 21–42 response to, 241–242 hybrids and, 151, 156–157 sensibility property and, 242 illusion and, 7–8, 10 software model of, 263 imitation of nature and, 72, 74–75, Astronomy, 91–92 98n16 (see also Nature) Atalanta Fugiens (Maier), 275 Jesuits and, 135–142 Atechnon,59 Leibniz and, 212–219 Atlantis, 190 Mannerism and, 151–152 Atlas universalis (Leibniz), 15, 215–219 maximal principle and, 62–63 Augustine, 119–120 mechanics and, 67–97 (see also Automata, 13, 16–17, 101n42, 104n51, Mechanics) 188, 201 mimetic, 51–64, 301–308 animals and, 242–244 pictorial images and, 215–216 birthing machine and, 258–260 pleasure and, 54–63 breathing and, 245–247 power of, 3 defecation and, 247, 254 science and, 211–212 denunciation of, 265 sculpture and, 192–193 Descartes and, 243 secondary, 137–138 historic design styles of, 242–244 Spinoza and, 225–233 Jaquet-Droz family and, 244–246, 258 still life and, 149–174 Le Cat and, 261–262 Index 319 mass production of, 244 Intelligent Design and, 306 modern, 262–263 synthetic chemistry and, 301–308 moving anatomies and, 258–262, 266 technology transfer in, 305 physiological correctness and, 245–265 Theory of Inventive Problem Solving prosthetics and, 254–258 and, 305 Quesnay and, 261–262, 266 working hypothesis of, 304–305 sensation and, 263–264 Birthing machine, 258–260 spoken language and, 247, 249, 251– Blake, Linda, 51 254, 270nn25,26 Bodin, Jean, 199–200 Vaucanson and, 246–247, 251, 260, Boethius, 87 263, 265 Bol, Hans, 164 Vichy and, 244–245 Bonaventure, 126 ‘‘Automaten, Die’’ (Ho¤mann), 241 Boodt, Anselmus Boethius de, 164 Avicenna Book of the Remedy (Avicenna), 117 alchemy and, 110–121, 127, 275–276 Book on the Congealment and Concretion of demons and, 110, 119, 121 Stones (Avicenna), 117–119 Boscherini, Giancotti, 227 Bacon, Francis, 10, 14, 136 Botero, Giovanni, 202 chemistry and, 278, 281–282 Boussingault, J. B., 282 on invention, 190 Boxer, Steven, 303 Renaissance and, 186–190, 198, 202 Boyle, Robert, 135, 277–278 Bacon, Roger, 275 Bredekamp, Horst, 15, 188, 211–223 Baekeland, Leo, 294–295 Breeding, 9 Baeyer, 286 Broadie, Sarah, 38–39 Bakelite, 294–295, 308 Brock, W., 279, 283 Baldini, Bernardino, 171–172 Brooke, John Hedley, 17, 275–292 Barthes, Roland, 156, 296 Brooks, Rodney, 263 Baudrillard, Jean, 296 Brunelleschi, 195–196, 198–199 Becher, Johann Joachim, 214 Bry, Theodore de, 198 Beeckman, Isaac, 142 Belle Epoque, 244 Campanella, Tommaso, 14–15, 215– Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, 1–19, 216 293–321 ideal state of, 185–186 Berlin Academy of Science, 214 mechanics and, 186–191 Bernard, Claude, 264, 283 Renaissance and, 185–191, 198, 201 Berra, Giacomo, 152, 167, 172, 180n74 Campi, Vicenzo, 167 Berthelot, Marcellin, 276, 284–286, 288 Canon episcopi, 111, 113–114 Berzelius, 281–282, 286–287 Cantor, G., 289 Besson, Jacques, 189 Caravaggio, 152, 167 Bible, 110, 120–125 Cardano, 201 Biology, 1 Carnegie Mellon, 1 automata and, 13, 16–17, 188, 201, Carothers, William, 295 242–265 Cassiodorus, 87, 104n52 biomimesis and, 301–308 Castiglione, Baldassare, 153, 194 Hippocratics and, 21–42 Catalogus omnium corporum (Becher), Biomimesis. See also Mimetic art 214 design strategies in, 305–308 Caus, Salomon de, 189 Index 320 Cause structure theory for, 286–287 e‰cient, 56 synthetics and, 275–276, 279–290, final, 56–57 293–308 mechanics and, 68 systematic multiplication and, 284 mimetic art and, 56–57 temperature boundaries and, 279, 282– Celluloid, 294–295, 308, 309n4 283 Celsus, Aulus Cornelius, 33, 36–37 trial-and-error method and, 297–301 Cennini, Cennino, 8 vitalism and, 278, 281–283 Cesariano, Cesare, 197–198 x-ray crystallography and, 298 Chalcedon, 32 Chevreul, 279 Chemistry, 2–3, 17, 313 Chimera, 154–155, 302 alchemy and, 4–5, 13 (see also Chimie Organique fonde´e sur la Synthe`se Alchemy) (Berthelot), 284 ambivalence in, 283–284 Christianity, 87–88,
Recommended publications
  • Dio Chrysostom's Charidemus and Aristotle's Eudemus

    Dio Chrysostom's Charidemus and Aristotle's Eudemus

    Dio Chrysostom’s Charidemus and Aristotle’s Eudemus Katarzyna Jażdżewska IO CHRYSOSTOM’S DIALOGUE Charidemus exhibits a rich intertextual network, and recent scholarship has D explored Dio’s interaction with Plato’s Phaedo, with Hellenistic philosophy (particularly Stoicism and Cynicism), and with consolation, λόγος παραµυθητικός.1 In this note I would like to add to the literary background of the dialogue by arguing that, so far as extant evidence allows us to judge, Dio’s Charidemus seems to have been particularly closely associated with Aristotle’s lost dialogue Eudemus in respect to format, overall character, and themes covered. Aristotle’s Eudemus was a dialogue written to commemorate Eudemus of Cyprus, a deceased friend and a member of the Academy, who died in Syracuse around 354 B.C.E.2 Ps.- Plutarch’s Consolation to Apollonius 115B (= Arist. fr.44) informs us that Aristotle’s work was known under the title Eudemus, or On the soul. We do not know who the interlocutors were; Aristotle may have been one of the speakers.3 From Cicero’s De 1 For Plato see J. Moles, “The Dionian Charidemus,” 187–210, and M. Trapp, “Plato in Dio,” 213–239, in S. Swain (ed.), Dio Chrysostom. Politics, Letters, and Philosophy (Oxford 2000); K. Jażdżewska, “Dio Chrysostom’s Charidemos: A Study,” Eos 101 (2014) 67–81, at 69–76. For consolatory topoi, M. C. Giner Soria, “Acotaciones a un diálogo consolatorio,” Faventia 12–13 (1990) 293–305. For an overview of various influences on the Charidemus, M. Menchelli, Dione di Prusa. Caridemo (Or. XXX) (Naples 1999) 37–75.
  • The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary

    The Protrepticus of Clement of Alexandria: a Commentary

    Miguel Herrero de Jáuregui THE PROTREPTICUS OF CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA: A COMMENTARY to; ga;r yeu'do" ouj yilh'/ th'/ paraqevsei tajlhqou'" diaskedavnnutai, th'/ de; crhvsei th'" ajlhqeiva" ejkbiazovmenon fugadeuvetai. La falsedad no se dispersa por la simple comparación con la verdad, sino que la práctica de la verdad la fuerza a huir. Protréptico 8.77.3 PREFACIO Una tesis doctoral debe tratar de contribuir al avance del conocimiento humano en su disciplina, y la pretensión de que este comentario al Protréptico tenga la máxima utilidad posible me obliga a escribirla en inglés porque es la única lengua que hoy casi todos los interesados pueden leer. Pero no deja de ser extraño que en la casa de Nebrija se deje de lado la lengua castellana. La deuda que contraigo ahora con el español sólo se paliará si en el futuro puedo, en compensación, “dar a los hombres de mi lengua obras en que mejor puedan emplear su ocio”. Empiezo ahora a saldarla, empleándola para estos agradecimientos, breves en extensión pero no en sinceridad. Mi gratitud va, en primer lugar, al Cardenal Don Gil Álvarez de Albornoz, fundador del Real Colegio de España, a cuya generosidad y previsión debo dos años provechosos y felices en Bolonia. Al Rector, José Guillermo García-Valdecasas, que administra la herencia de Albornoz con ejemplar dedicación, eficacia y amor a la casa. A todas las personas que trabajan en el Colegio y hacen que cumpla con creces los objetivos para los que se fundó. Y a mis compañeros bolonios durante estos dos años. Ha sido un honor muy grato disfrutar con todos ellos de la herencia albornociana.
  • Daniel Jugrin

    Daniel Jugrin

    Studia Philosophiae Christianae UKSW 52(2016)2 DanIel JuGrIn THE WAY OF ἈΝΆΛΥΣΙΣ: CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA AND THE PLATONIC TRADITION Abstract. In Clement of Alexandria, the three ways of knowing God appear implicitly in the form: the way of analogy, the way of negation (in the mathematical version), and the way of eminence. A basic aspect of the negation appears as an expression of Clementine criticism on anthropomorphism. The Platonic traditional model of via negativa is related to the mathematical theory of abstraction and is defined as a denial of the material things in order to reach the contemplation of God through pure mind: “we start by abstracting the surface, and we are left with the line; we abstract the line, and we are left with the point; we abstract the point, or strictly speaking the monad, and we are then precipitated into the greatness of Christ” (Stromateis V.11.71.2). Clement of Alexandria is, also, one of the authors who emphasize silence and prayer as having great importance in the knowledge process. The cessation of the activity of the senses leads to the supreme state of contemplation with a pure mind. Silence becomes, in this way, a symbol of God, and knowledge – not a matter of speaking, but of being. Keywords: Clement of Alexandria, Platonic Tradition, knowledge of God, abstractive way, analysis, aphairesis, silence 1. The geometrical method of ἀνάλυσις . 2. Via negativa and the theme of silence in Clement of Alexandria. 3. The origin of the mathematical model of via negativa. St. Justin, martyr and philosopher (103 – 165 AD), was the first Christian thinker who claimed that God can be characterized only in negative terms.1 His vision was familiar in the context of Helle- nistic Judaism: Philo of Alexandria (20 BC – 50 AD)2 had already established the ideas put forward by Justin.
  • The Appeal to Easiness in Aristotle's Protrepticus

    The Appeal to Easiness in Aristotle's Protrepticus

    THE APPEAL TO EASINESS IN ARISTOTLE’S PROTREPTICUS Matthew D. Walker [Uncorrected draft. To be published in Ancient Philosophy 39 (2019). Please cite only the final published version.] Aristotle’s Protrepticus sought to exhort its audience to engage in philosophy (filosofi&a), i.e., the “acquisition and use of wisdom” (kth~si&v te kai_ xrh~siv sofi&av: 6, 40.2-3/B53; cf. 6, 37.7-9/B8).1 The Protrepticus is now lost. But work by D.S. Hutchinson and Monte Ransome Johnson (2005) has confirmed earlier speculation – initiated by Ingram Bywater (1869) – that Iamblichus preserves large passages of the work in his own Protrepticus. Hutchinson and Johnson 2018 argue that significant portions of the Protrepticus also appear in Iamblichus’ De Communi Mathematica Scientia (DCMS), and that the Protrepticus was originally a dialogue. In passages preserved in Chapter 6 of Iamblichus’ Protrepticus (at 40.15-41.2/B55- 56), Aristotle offers three linked arguments for the claim that philosophy is easy. (I number the arguments in the translation that follows.) [1] For, with no pay coming from people to those who philosophize, on account of which [the latter] would have labored strenuously in this way, and with a great lead extended to the other arts, nevertheless their passing [the other arts] in exactness despite running a short time seems to me to be a sign of the easiness about philosophy. [2] And further, everybody’s feeling at home in it and wishing to occupy leisure with it, leaving aside all else, is no small sign that the close attention comes with pleasure; for no one is willing to labor for a long time.
  • Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)

    Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)

    HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN COMMENTARY TRADITION (IN LESS THAN SIXTY MINUTES) Fred D. Miller, Jr. CHAPTER 1 PERIPATETIC SCHOLARS Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BCE) Exoteric works: Protrepticus, On Philosophy, Eudemus, etc. Esoteric works: Categories, Physics, De Caelo, Metaphysics, De Anima, etc. The legend of Aristotle’s misappropriated works Andronicus of Rhodes: first edition of Aristotle’s works (40 BCE) Early Peripatetic commentators Boethus of Sidon (c. 75—c. 10 BCE) comm. on Categories Alexander of Aegae (1st century CE)comm. on Categories and De Caelo Adrastus of Aphrodisias (early 1st century) comm. on Categories Aspasius (c. 131) comm. on Nicomachean Ethics Emperor Marcus Aurelius establishes four chairs of philosophy in Athens: Platonic, Peripatetic, Stoic, Epicurean (c. 170) Alexander of Aphrodisias (late 2nd —early 3rd century) Extant commentaries on Prior Analytics, De Sensu, etc. Lost comm. on Physics, De Caelo, etc. Exemplar for all subsequent commentators. Comm. on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Only books 1—5 of Alexander’s comm. are genuine; books 6—14 are by ps.-Alexander . whodunit? Themistius (c. 317—c. 388) Paraphrases of Physics, De Anima, etc. Paraphrase of Metaphysics Λ (Hebrew translation) Last of the Peripatetics CHAPTER 2 NEOPLATONIC SCHOLARS Origins of Neoplatonism Ammonius Saccas (c. 175—242) forefather of Neoplatonism Plotinus (c. 205—260) the Enneads Reality explained in terms of hypostases: THE ONE—> THE INTELLECT—>WORLD SOUL—>PERCEPTIBLE WORLD Porphyry of Tyre (232–309) Life of Plotinus On the School of Plato and Aristotle Being One On the Difference Between Plato and Aristotle Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories) What is Neoplatonism? A broad intellectual movement based on the philosophy of Plotinus that sought to incorporate and reconcile the doctrines of Plato, Pythagoras, and Aristotle with each other and with the universal beliefs and practices of popular religion (e.g.
  • Walter Nicgorski: Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians 35 and the Teachings of the Peripatetic School Founded by Aristotle

    Walter Nicgorski: Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians 35 and the Teachings of the Peripatetic School Founded by Aristotle

    WALTER NICGORSKI Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians ABSTRACT: Set against tendencies in the Renaissance and later political theory to see Cicero in tension with Aristotle, this research essay reports the results of a close study of all of Cicero’s texts that bear on his reading, understanding and assessment of Aristotle and the Peripatetic school. The essay necessarily attends to Cicero’s sources for his encoun- ter with Aristotle and affirms, with some qualifications, Cicero’s overall continuity with the moral and political thought of Aristotle. KEYWORDS: Aristotle, Cicero, Socrates, Theophrastus, Peripatetic, New Academy, Rhetoric, Stoic, Dialogues, Virtue, Equality, Petrarch. [M]y philosophical writings differing very little from Peri- patetic teachings, for both I and those men wish to follow in the Socratic and Platonic tradition… (Cicero, De Officiis I. 2) cicero was rome’s “best Aristotelian”. (dante)1 The authority of the American Declaration of Independen- ce rests in part on its drawing from “elementary books of public right as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, etc.” (Tho- mas Jefferson, 1824/1973. 12) This research essay provides the basis, in cicero’s own writings, to see his moral and political thinking as a significant Roman manifestation of political Aristo- telianism. It examines closely his assessment of Aristotle’s political legacy and the necessary preliminary topic of cicero’s sources for understanding Aristotle 1 This was dante’s judgement according to A. E. Douglas (1965, 162) and Paul Renucci (1954, 331). A seemingly different claim made by the 20th century scholar Ernest Fortin (1996, 33) was that cicero and Varro are “Plato’s roman disciples.” WALTER NICGORSKI: CICERO ON ARISTOTLE AND ARISTOTELIANS 35 and the teachings of the Peripatetic school founded by Aristotle.
  • Preprint N°500

    Preprint N°500

    2020 Preprint N°500 From Hesiod to Saussure, from Hippocrates to Jevons: An Introduction to the History of Scientific Thought between Iran and the Atlantic Jens Høyrup ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR Section for philosophy WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE and science studies Berlin FROM HESIOD TO SAUSSURE, FROM HIPPOCRATES TO JEVONS An introduction to the history of scientific thought between Iran and the Atlantic Jens Høyrup Preprint, April 2020 ©2020 Jens Høyrup In memory of Alex Novikoff whose Climbing Our Family Tree introduced me to scientific thinking at the age of six I promise nothing complete; because any human thing supposed to be complete, must for that reason infallibly be faulty Herman Melville, Moby Dick Jens Høyrup Section for Philosophy and Science Studies Roskilde University P.O. Box 260 DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark [email protected] http://ruc.dk/~jensh/ Greek alphabet V GREEK ALPHABET As a pretext for training the use of a dictionary of ancient Greek, the following pages contain a few words written in Greek letters. The four columns below show the corresponding alphabet – first the Greek minuscule, then the corresponding majuscule, then the name, and finally the approximate phonetic value (which does not always coincide with the phonetic value in modern Greek). αΑalpha a βΒBeta b γΓGamma g ( before γ, κ and χ; γγ thus as ng in English anger, γκ as nk in ink) δΔDelta d εΕEpsilon e (short) ζΖZeta z (i.e., voiced s) ηΗEta e¯ (long) θΘTheta þ (unvoiced th; originally t’) ιΙIota i (as i in English if or e in be, may thus be short or long) κΚKappa k λΛLambda l µΜMu m νΝNu n ξΞKsi ks οΟOmikron o (short) πΠPi p ρΡRho r (transcribed rh in initial posi- tion) σΣSigma s ςΣSigma s (used in final position) τΤTau t υΥYpsilon y (as German ü) φΦPhi f (originally p’) χΧKhi χ (as ch in German Ich; orig- inally k’) ψΨPsi ps ωΩOmega o¯ (long) The following double vowels may be taken note of: VI Greek alphabet αυ au ευ eu ου u (as English oo) Vowels in the initial position are marked by one of the two aspiration marks and .
  • Université De Sherbrooke Faculté Des Lettres Et Sciences Humaines Département De Philosophie Et D'éthique Appliquée La Ju

    Université De Sherbrooke Faculté Des Lettres Et Sciences Humaines Département De Philosophie Et D'éthique Appliquée La Ju

    Université de Sherbrooke Faculté des lettres et sciences humaines Département de philosophie et d’éthique appliquée La justification de l'éclectisme : Galien médecin et philosophe Par Jérémie Hébrard Sous la direction de Benoît Castelnérac Sherbrooke Juillet 2020 Résumé : L’enjeu de ce mémoire tient en quelques mots : restituer à Galien la place qui lui convient au sein de l’histoire de la philosophie. Les préjugés entourant l’œuvre du médecin de Pergame ainsi que son agnosticisme avoué lui ont souvent valu la réputation d’être un penseur sans grande profondeur qu’on pouvait négliger sans préjudice. La richesse de son témoignage, dont les philosophes ont fait peu de cas jusqu’à assez récemment, se révèle pourtant indispensable pour reconstituer la transition entre la philosophie post-hellénistique vers l’Antiquité tardive. Si la tâche peut paraître herculéenne, on aurait pourtant tort de s’en détourner sous ce prétexte, et notre modeste contribution s’avère un pas dans la bonne direction. Dans ce mémoire, je me propose de revoir l’immense œuvre de Galien à la lumière de son attitude éclectique, qui cimente sa pensée en dépit de la pluralité des thèmes qu’elle englobe. Cette recherche plaide donc pour une interprétation renouvelée de la relation de Galien à la philosophie en cherchant d’abord à montrer comment les courants de pensée qu’il côtoyait ont influencé sa pensée, mais également comment il s’est affranchi du dogmatisme des écoles philosophiques. Sa relation avec le scepticisme de la Nouvelle Académie y est également abordée dans notre traduction inédite de son traité Du meilleur enseignement.
  • The Highest Good and the Best Activity: Aristotle on the Well-Lived Life" (2011)

    The Highest Good and the Best Activity: Aristotle on the Well-Lived Life" (2011)

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 2011 The Highest Good and the Best Activity: Aristotle on the Well- Lived Life Philip William Bauchan Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons Recommended Citation Bauchan, Philip William, "The Highest Good and the Best Activity: Aristotle on the Well-Lived Life" (2011). Master's Theses. 514. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/514 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2011 Philip William Bauchan LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO THE HIGHEST GOOD AND THE BEST ACTIVITY: ARISTOTLE ON THE WELL-LIVED LIFE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS PROGRAM IN PHILOSOPHY BY PHILIP WILLIAM BAUCHAN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2011 When zeroing in on the primary points in the Nicomachean Ethics at which Aristotle explicitly discusses the nature of eudaimonia , Book I.1-5; 7 and Book X.7-8 are always singled out as the most crucial sections. While the entire text is filled with discussions that variably shine light on how Aristotle conceives of eudaimonia , it is the aforementioned passages that must be fully addressed and accounted for in any study of this topic.
  • Aristotle's Metaphysics / C.D.C

    Aristotle's Metaphysics / C.D.C

    SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS SUBSTANTIAL KNOWLEDGE ARISTOTLE’S METAPHYSICS C.D.C. REEVE hackett publishing company, inc. indianapolis/cambridge Copyright © 2000 by Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 For further information, please address: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. P.O. Box 44937 Indianapolis, IN 46244-0937 www.hackettpublishing.com Cover and interior design by Abigail Coyle Cover photograph: "The Inheritance of Form." Reproduced by permission of the artist. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Reeve, C.D.C., 1948– Substantial knowledge : Aristotle's metaphysics / C.D.C. Reeve. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 0-87220-515-0 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-87220-514-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Aristotle—Contributions in metaphysics. 2. Metaphysics. 3. Aristotle— Contributions in philosophy of substance. 4. Substance (Philosophy) I. Title. B491.M4 R44 2000 100'.92—dc21 99-052539 ISBN-13: 978-0-87220-515-4 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-87220-514-7 (paper) eISBN: 978-1-60384-014-9 (ebook) For George and John not many behold God he is only for those of 100 percent pneuma —Zbigniew Herbert “Report from Paradise” TABLE of CONTENTS Introduction xiii Abbreviations of Aristotle’s Works xvii ONE PLATONISM 1 1.1 Separation 1 1.2 Platonic Forms 10 1.3 Problems with Platonic Forms 13 TWO SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE 18 2.1 Aristotelian Sciences 18 2.2 Dialectic and First Principles 21 2.3 Natural Sciences 27 2.4 Natural and Theoretical Sciences 35 2.5
  • Aristotle's Theory of Powers

    Aristotle's Theory of Powers

    Aristotle’s Theory of Powers by Umer Shaikh A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Philosophy) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Professor Victor Caston, chair Professor Sara Abhel-Rappe Professor David Manley Professor Tad Schmaltz Umer Shaikh [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8062-7932 © Umer Shaikh 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................... v Chapter 1 Introduction ................................... 1 1.1 The Question ............................... 1 1.2 Powers and Dispositions ......................... 2 1.3 Remark on Translation and Texts .................... 3 1.4 Preliminary Answers ........................... 3 1.4.1 Powers are Efficient Causes ................... 4 1.4.2 Powers and Change ....................... 5 1.4.3 Being in Potentiality and Possibility .............. 6 1.4.4 The Foundation of Modality .................. 8 1.4.5 Possibilities from Powers .................... 9 1.4.6 Conclusion ............................ 11 1.5 Remarks About Scope of Discussion and About the Development of the δύναμις Concept ........................... 12 1.5.1 Scope ............................... 12 1.5.2 Δύναμις in Various Texts .................... 12 1.5.3 Previous Attempts to Find Consistency ............ 18 1.5.3.1 Kenny .......................... 18 1.5.3.2 Hintikka ......................... 21 1.5.4 Drawing Some Morals ..................... 22 2 Powers and Efficient Causation ......................... 24 2.1
  • Chapter Five

    Chapter Five

    chapter five SUMMARY Theophrastus, Aristotle’s pupil and second head of the Peripatetic School, wasapopularteacher.Heissaidtohavehadroughly,students (.). He was also a prolific writer. The catalogue of Theophrastus’ writ- ings preserved by Diogenes Laertius in his Life of Theophrastus lists c. titles (.–). His surviving works include two multi-book treatises on botany, eight scientific opuscula, a short work on first principles (the so-called Metaphysics), a doxographical work on sense-perception and the Characters. Aside from the last, none of Theophrastus’ writings on ethical topics has survived intact, so that we must turn to secondary sources in order to gain knowledge of Theophrastus’ teachings on ethics. These sources (those that are printed in the text-translation volumes as against those that are listed in the apparatus of parallel texts) number . Some belong to the Roman Republic, while others belong to the Empire and the Middle Ages. Some source authors wrote in Greek, but there are also Latin and Arabic sources; even one in Italian. Moreover and most important, the sources vary greatly in their reliability. Late collections of excerpts and sayings must always be approached with caution, but even earlier, respected authors like Cicero and Plutarch may write in ways that are misleading. Each source author needs to be evaluated not only in regard to general reliability but also in regard to particular assertions in particular contexts. Most likely Diogenes’ catalogue of Theophrastean writings derives from the work On Theophrastus byHermippusofSmyrna(ndhalfofthe rd cent. bc). The catalogue divides into five lists plus two addenda. The lists probably represent different purchases by the library in Alexandria.