DOCSLIB.ORG

EVALUATION REPORT Photo Credit: Forcier MOZAMBIQUE’S STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES THROUGH INTEGRATED PROGRAMMING (SCIP) EX-POST EVALUATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EVALUATION REPORT Photo Credit: Forcier MOZAMBIQUE’S STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES THROUGH INTEGRATED PROGRAMMING (SCIP) EX-POST EVALUATION EVALUATION REPORT Photo Credit: Forcier MOZAMBIQUE’S STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES THROUGH INTEGRATED PROGRAMMING (SCIP) EX-POST EVALUATION WASH Ex-Post Evaluation Series—Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project July 2020 THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ECODIT LLC AND SOCIAL IMPACT INC. FOR USAID UNDER THE WATER CKM PROJECT IDIQ NO. AID-OAA-I-14-00069; TASK ORDER NO. AID-OAA-TO-15-00046. AUTHORITY Prepared for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Water and Development Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract No. AID-OAA-I-14-00069, Task Order No. AID-OAA-TO-15-00046, awarded September 17, 2015, entitled “Water Communications and Knowledge Management (CKM) Project.” This final report is made possible by the support of the American people through USAID. The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECODIT LLC and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. The Water CKM project team, comprised of ECODIT LLC and Social Impact Inc., prepared this report under the leadership of Holly Dentz, Senior Technical Specialist, Leslie Hodel, Senior Technical Specialist, and Kari Nelson, Technical Director. i | E3/WATER CKM: SCIP EX-POST EVALUATION FINAL REPORT USAID.GOV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The evaluation team (ET) would like to thank the current and former staff at the implementer World Vision for their participation and provision of documentation and valuable feedback. The ET also appreciates Forcier Consulting’s provision of data collection services. The ET is grateful to Bacelar Muneme for his consulting services, especially his insight into the water and sanitation sector in Mozambique and contributions to securing documentation and qualitative data collection. The ET would like to acknowledge the support of Grace Tang and Andrew Chatting who contributed to the evaluation. The ET also thanks the staff at USAID, including Gastao Mendes, Ken Hassan, Abigail Jones, Elizabeth Jordan, Alison Macalady, Maria “Ella” Lazarte, Nga Nguyen, Leonor Domingos, Sheila Zacarias, and Clara Dimene for their support and feedback through the entire evaluation process. Finally, the ET would like to thank the many stakeholders who spoke with us about the SCIP activity. The support and engagement of these organizations and stakeholders proved invaluable during the evaluation process. USAID.GOV E3/WATER CKM: SCIP/USAID EX-POST EVALUATION FINAL REPORT | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Authority ......................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iii Figures ........................................................................................................................................... iv Tables ............................................................................................................................................. v Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................................vii Purpose and Overview .............................................................................................................................................. vii Scope and Design ........................................................................................................................................................ vii Key Findings ................................................................................................................................................................. viii Water Points........................................................................................................................................................... viii Sanitation ................................................................................................................................................................... ix Handwashing ............................................................................................................................................................. ix WASH Capacity, Integration, and Resilience ..................................................................................................... x Conclusions .................................................................................................................................................................... x Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ xi INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 Overview of Activity and Budget .............................................................................................................................. 2 Implementation and Intervention Approach........................................................................................................... 3 SCIP Key Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 EVALUATION QUESTIONS ...................................................................................................... 7 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 8 Overview ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Evaluation Team ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Data Collection Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 9 Qualitative Interviews .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Quantitative Data ................................................................................................................................................... 10 Sampling ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Quality Checks ............................................................................................................................................................ 11 Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................................... 12 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 14 Water Points and Use ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Household Latrines ..................................................................................................................................................... 24 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................. 31 Handwashing................................................................................................................................................................. 31 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 WASH Capacity, Integration, and Resilience ....................................................................................................... 36 Findings ...................................................................................................................................................................... 36 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa Institutions, Governance and Policy Processes
    SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS IN SOUTHERN AFRICA INSTITUTIONS, GOVERNANCE AND POLICY PROCESSES Mozambique Mapping Phase Report 2 of 2 Mapping Policy, Institutions and Livelihoods in Zambézia Province, Mozambique Simon Norfolk, Isilda Nhantumbo, IUCN Mozambique João Pereira and Zefanias Matsimbe, UFICS/UEM 2001 Mapping Phase Report 2 - Mozambique Version 1 Last Updated 18 March 2000 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1 2. Site identification and characterization ..................................................................1 2.1. Derre Administrative Post (Morrumbala)...................................................................4 2.2. Bajone Administrative Post (Maganja da Costa)........................................................5 3. Natural resource use and livelihood strategies in the study areas ..........................5 3.1. Derre...........................................................................................................................6 3.1.1. Community mapping exercise.............................................................................6 3.1.2. Activities .............................................................................................................7 3.1.3. Vulnerabilities ....................................................................................................8 3.1.4. Livelihood strategies ..........................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Projectos De Energias Renováveis Recursos Hídrico E Solar
    FUNDO DE ENERGIA Energia para todos para Energia CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFÓLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES Edition nd 2 2ª Edição July 2019 Julho de 2019 DO POVO DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS NM ISO 9001:2008 FUNDO DE ENERGIA CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS PORTFOLIO HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES FICHA TÉCNICA COLOPHON Título Title Carteira de Projectos de Energias Renováveis - Recurso Renewable Energy Projects Portfolio - Hydro and Solar Hídrico e Solar Resources Redação Drafting Divisão de Estudos e Planificação Studies and Planning Division Coordenação Coordination Edson Uamusse Edson Uamusse Revisão Revision Filipe Mondlane Filipe Mondlane Impressão Printing Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Leima Impressões Originais, Lda Tiragem Print run 300 Exemplares 300 Copies Propriedade Property FUNAE – Fundo de Energia FUNAE – Energy Fund Publicação Publication 2ª Edição 2nd Edition Julho de 2019 July 2019 CARTEIRA DE PROJECTOS DE RENEWABLE ENERGY ENERGIAS RENOVÁVEIS PROJECTS PORTFOLIO RECURSOS HÍDRICO E SOLAR HYDRO AND SOLAR RESOURCES PREFÁCIO PREFACE O acesso universal a energia em 2030 será uma realidade no País, Universal access to energy by 2030 will be reality in this country, mercê do “Programa Nacional de Energia para Todos” lançado por thanks to the “National Energy for All Program” launched by Sua Excia Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, Presidente da República de Moçam- His Excellency Filipe Jacinto Nyusi, President of the
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the European Commission's Support To
    MOZAMBIQUE COUNTRY LEVEL EVALUATION FINAL REPORT ANNEX EGEVAL II EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SUPPORT TO THE REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE Country Level Evaluation Contract n°EVA/116-828 Final Report Annexes 14th December 2007 Evaluation for the European Commission MOZAMBIQUE COUNTRY LEVEL EVALUATION FINAL REPORT ANNEX EGEVAL II This evaluation is commissioned by: The Evaluation Unit common to: EuropeAid Co-operation Office, Directorate General for Development and External Relations Directorate-General This evaluation is carried out by EGEval II EEIG on behalf of PARTICIP GmbH. John Clifton is the contact person in the external evaluation team ([email protected]). Mirjam Luthe-Alves is the contact person in PARTICIP ([email protected]). Dr. Georg Ladj is the Evaluation consortium contract manager ([email protected]). The evaluation is managed by the Evaluation Unit, who also chaired the reference group composed by members of the services (EuropeAid, DG Dev, DG Budget and the EC Delegation in Mozambique) and the Embassy of the Republic of Mozambique in Belgium. The opinions expressed in this document represent the authors’ points of view, which are not necessarily shared by the European Commission or by the authorities of the countries concerned. Status and versions of the document Vers. Date Status Feedback / Date Reference 01 10/06/07 1st draft Final Report 02 15/06/07 2nd draft Final Report 03 17/08/07 3rd draft Final Report 04 14/12/07 Final Report MOZAMBIQUE COUNTRY LEVEL EVALUATION FINAL REPORT ANNEX EGEVAL
    [Show full text]
  • The Infrastructure Industry in Mozambique Contents Siccode 502
    THE INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRY IN MOZAMBIQUE Siccode 502 September 2015 Compiled by: CAROLE VEITCH [email protected] JOHANNESBURG OFFICE 7 STURDEE AVENUE, ROSEBANK, 2196 P O BOX 3044, RANDBURG, 2125 TEL: +27 11 280-0880 PORT ELIZABETH OFFICE 1ST FLOOR, BLOCK F, SOUTHERN LIFE GARDENS, 70 2ND AVE NEWTON PARK 6045 P O BOX 505, HUNTERS RETREAT, 6017 TEL: +27 41 394-0600 WEBSITE: WWW.WHOOWNSWHOM.CO.ZA REG NO: 1986/003014/07 DIRECTORS: MAUREEN MPHATSOE (CHAIRPERSON), MICHELLE BEETAR (EXPERIAN), PAXTON ANDERSON (EXPERIAN), ANDREW MCGREGOR (MANAGING) The Infrastructure Industry in Mozambique Contents Siccode 502 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 2. DESCRIPTION ..........................................................................................................................1 2.1. Supply Chain ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2. Geographic Position ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1. Key Cities and Regions .................................................................................................... 4 3. SIZE OF THE INDUSTRY ............................................................................................................5 3.1. Key Indigenous and Foreign Players ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feeder Roads Project Zambézia: Follow‐Up Assessment Scds
    FEEDER ROADS PROJECT ZAMBÉZIA: FOLLOW‐UP ASSESSMENT SCDS Mozambique (membro do Grupo Norconsult) Gaye Thompson, Cecília Pedro DECEMBER 2012 Feeder Roads Project Zambézia: Follow-Up Assessment 2012 This project was funded by the Africa Community Access Programme (AFCAP) which promotes safe and sustainable access to markets, healthcare, education, employment and social and political networks for rural communities in Africa. Launched in June 2008 and managed by Crown Agents, the five year‐long, UK government (DFID) funded project, supports research and knowledge sharing between participating countries to enhance the uptake of low cost, proven solutions for rural access that maximise the use of local resources. The programme is currently active in Ethiopia, Kenya, Ghana, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Zambia, South Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo and South Sudan and is developing relationships with a number of other countries and regional organisations across Africa. This material has been funded by UKaid from the Department for International Development, however 2 | Page Feeder Roads Project Zambézia: Follow-Up Assessment 2012 Table of contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 9 1 SUMMARY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................ 11 2 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Support to the National Integrated Plan to Achieve Mdgs 4&5
    Support to the National Integrated Plan to achieve MDGs 4&5 Reporting Period: 1 January – 31 December 2014 Country, Locality(s), Priority Area(s) / Strategic Programme Title & Project Number Results1 Programme Title: Support to the National Integrated Country/Region: Mozambique Plan to Achieve MDGs 4&5 Health and Nutrition Programme Number SC 12 0131 & SC130257 (UNICEF) Priority area/ strategic results MPTF Office Project Reference Number: 00081835 Participating Organization(s) Implementing Partners WFP, WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF Ministry of Health; Provincial Health Directorate of Zambezia Province; National Institute for Social Communication (ICS); Grupo de Teatro do Oprimido (GTO); Associacao Mocambicana de Desenvolvimento da Familia (AMODEFA); Ministry of Women and Welfare (MIMAS); Women and Welfare Provincial Directorate (DPMAS); Ministry of Youth and Sports (MJD); Youth and Sports Provincial Health Directorate (DPJD) Programme/Project Cost (US$) Programme Duration Total approved budget as per project document: Overall Duration (months): MPTF /JP Contribution: 44 months USD 20.422.671 Start Date: 26/01/2012 Original End Date: 31/12/2015 Current End date: 30/09/2015 Programme Assessment/Review/Mid-Term Eval. Report Submitted By Assessment/Review - if applicable please attach o Name: James McQuenPatterson Yes No Date: dd.mm.yyyy o Title: Health and Nutrition Chief Mid-Term Evaluation Report – if applicable please attach o Participating Organization (Lead): UNICEF Yes No Date: dd.mm.yyyy Email address: [email protected] 1 Strategic Results, as formulated in the Strategic UN Planning Framework (e.g. UNDAF) or project document; Page 1 of 52 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CIDA funding has supported activities to reach the MDG4&5 in Mozambique since 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Situation Overview
    Mozambique: Flooding Office of the Resident Coordinator, Situation Report No. 5 (As of 13 March 2015) This report is prepared by the Humanitarian Country Team/Office of the Resident Coordinator in Mozambique. It covers the period from 24 February to 13 March 2015. Highlights From 04 to 08 March 2015, the central and north of the country were severely affected by heavy rains due to a tropical depression formed in the Mozambique Channel affecting at least 144,882 people in Nampula and Cabo Delgado; There are about 10,000 houses destroyed partially/completely in Nampula and Cabo Delgado; In Zambézia province, in terms of Agriculture, there are 60,723 households affected and 60,051 ha of crops lost; A cholera outbreak has been confirmed in Tete, Nampula, Zambézia, Sofala and Niassa provinces, with a cumulative of 5.894 cases and 48 deaths since 25 December 2014. Flooded area in Nampula province, Larde district – March 2015 © INGC Mozambique 327,327 163 56,259 US$ 20,9 5.894 Affected people Deaths people in million Cholera cases in Tete, accommodation Nampula, Sofala, Needed for ongoing centers/resettlement Response and Recovery Zambézia and Niassa centers actions Situation Overview The Mozambican government on 3rd March 2015 downgraded the state of alert from red to orange, following a general improvement in the weather and the receding of floodwaters in the central and northern provinces. Furthermore, the government had opted to downgrade the alert, because life in the flood-affected areas has been gradually returning to normal. Regardless the downgrade of the red alert, all actions to support people affected by the floods in Zambézia would continue and tied vigilance on the climatic conditions as we still in the rainy and cyclone season.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Management Framework (Esmf)
    E4142 REPÚBLICA DE MOÇAMBIQUE Public Disclosure Authorized MINISTÉRIO DA PLANIFICAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO DIRECÇÃO NACIONAL DE SERVIÇOS DE PLANEAMENTO Public Disclosure Authorized Mozambique Integrated Growth Poles Project (P127303) ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK (ESMF) Public Disclosure Authorized Draft Final Public Disclosure Authorized Maputo, February 2013 0 LIST OF ACRONYMS ANE National Roads Administration CBNRM Community-Based Natural Resource Management DA District Administration DCC District Consultative Council DNA National Directorate for Water DNE National Directorate for Energy DNPO National Directorate for Planning DNAPOT National Directorate for Land Planning DNPA National Directorate for Environmental Promotion and Education DPA Provincial Directorate of Agriculture DPCA Provincial Directorate for the Coordination of Environmental Affairs DPOPH Provincial Directorate of Public Works and Housing EA Environmental Assessment EDM Electricidade de Moçambique EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FIPAG Water Supply Investment and Asset Management Fund GAZEDA Special Economic Zones Office GDP Gross Domestic Product GOM Government of Mozambique IDA International Development Association IDCF Innovation and Demonstration Catalytic Fun MAE Ministry of State Administration MCA Millennium Challenge Account MCC
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    The World Bank Report No: ISR16913 Implementation Status & Results Mozambique National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program (P107311) Operation Name: National Decentralized Planning and Finance Program Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 9 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: 01-Dec-2014 (P107311) Public Disclosure Authorized Country: Mozambique Approval FY: 2010 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Technical Assistance Loan Implementing Agency(ies): Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 30-Mar-2010 Original Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Planned Mid Term Review Date 30-Jun-2013 Last Archived ISR Date 12-Jul-2014 Effectiveness Date 30-Aug-2010 Revised Closing Date 30-Jun-2015 Actual Mid Term Review Date 18-Sep-2013 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The Project Development Objective is to improve the capacity of local government to manage public financial resources for district development in a participatory and transparent manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project? Public Disclosure Authorized Yes No Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Improving National Systems 3.20 Strengthening Participatory Planning and Budgeting 10.40 Enhancing Management and Implementation Capacity 9.20 Strengthening Oversight and Accountability 0.30 Knowledge Management 0.40 Effective Project Management and Coordination 3.90 Non-Common-Fund Activities 0.00 Public Disclosure Authorized Overall Ratings Previous Rating
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Weekly Report Is Currently Being Distributed to Over 25 Embassies, 36 Non-Governmental Organisations and 428 Businesses and Individuals in Mozambique
    WEEKLY MEDIA REVIEW: 4 SEPTEMBER TO 11 SEPTEMBER 2015 www.rhula.net Managing Editor: Nigel Morgan Minister Pedro Couto and his newly sworn in team of the Ministry of Mineral Resources and Energy (see page 20 for more). Rhula Intelligent Solutions is a Private Risk Management Company servicing multinational companies, non-governmental organisations and private clients operating in Mozambique. The Rhula Mozambique Weekly Report is currently being distributed to over 25 embassies, 36 non-governmental organisations and 428 businesses and individuals in Mozambique. For additional information or services please contact: Joe van der Walt David Barske Operations Director Operations Specialist Mobile (SA): +27 79 516 8710 Mobile (SA): +27 76 691 8934 Mobile (Moz): +258 826 780 038 Fax: +27 86 620 8389 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is intended to provide general information on a particular subject or subjects. While all reasonable steps are taken to ensure the accuracy and the integrity of information and date transmitted electronically and to preserve the confidentiality thereof, no liability or responsibility whatsoever is accepted by us should information or date for whatever reason or cause be corrupted or fail to reach its intended destination. It is not an exhaustive document on such subject(s), nor does it create a business or professional services relationship. The information contained herein is not intended to constitute professional advice or services. The material discussed is meant to provide general information, and should not be acted on without obtaining professional advice appropriately tailored to your individual needs.
    [Show full text]
  • "Avaliação De Um Projeto De Fortalecimento Das Capacidades Para Resposta Ao HIV: Estudo De Caso Na Província De Gaza - Moçambique"
    Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical "Avaliação de um Projeto de Fortalecimento das Capacidades para Resposta ao HIV: Estudo de Caso na Província de Gaza - Moçambique" Mie Okamura DISSERTAÇÃO PARA OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE DOUTOR EM SAÚDE INTERNACIONAL, ESPECIALIDADE DE POLÍTICAS DE SAÚDE E DESENVOLVIMENTO Dezembro de 2016 Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical "Avaliação de um Projeto de Fortalecimento das Capacidades para Resposta ao HIV: Estudo de Caso na Província de Gaza - Moçambique" Autora: Mie Okamura Orientadora: Professora Doutora Sónia Ferreira Dias Coorientadora: Professora Doutora Zulmira Maria de Araújo Hartz Dissertação apresentada para cumprimento dos requisitos necessários à obtenção do grau de Doutor em Saúde Internacional, especialidade de Políticas de Saúde e Desenvolvimento, de acordo com o Regulamento Geral do 3.º Ciclo de Estudos Superiores Conducentes à Obtenção do Grau de Doutor pelo Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical/Universidade Nova de Lisboa (n.º 474/2012) publicado no Diário da República, 2.ª série, n.º 223 de 19 de novembro de 2012. Aos meus pais Yaeko e Heihatiro, Por acreditar nesta filha, dando o seu apoio espiritual e amor incondicional ao longo de toda a minha caminhada e as condições necessárias para que os estudos fossem a prioridade na minha vida. i ii Agradecimentos Deparo-me com esta parte e vejo que as linhas serão insuficientes para demonstrar a minha gratidão por todos que, ao longo da minha jornada acadêmica foram essenciais para a concretização deste projeto. É inevitável que as minhas primeiras palavras sejam dirigidas à familia que atenuaram a minha ausência olhando pelos meus pais, apoiaram-me nos momentos difíceis e festejaram cada um dos meus pequenos sucessos.
    [Show full text]
  • MOZAMBIQUE June 2001, Rome Italy
    Nutrition Country Profiles – MOZAMBIQUE June 2001, Rome Italy FAO - NUTRITION COUNTRY PROFILES MOZAMBIQUEMOZAMBIQUE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Nutrition Country Profiles – MOZAMBIQUE 11 June 2001 1 Note for the reader The objective of the Nutrition Country Profiles (NCP) is to provide concise analytical summaries describing the food and nutrition situation in individual countries with background statistics on food-related factors. The profiles present consistent and comparable statistics in a standard format. This pre-defined format combines a set of graphics, tables and maps each supported by a short explanatory text. Information regarding the agricultural production, demography and socio-economic level of the country are also presented. In general, data presented in the NCP are derived from national sources as well as from international databases (FAO, WHO...). Technical notes giving detailed information on the definition and use of the indicators provided in the profile can be obtained from ESNA upon request. An information note describing the objectives of the NCP is also available. Useful suggestions or observations to improve the quality of this product are welcome. The data used to prepare the maps are available in Excel upon request at: E-mail: [email protected] Nutrition Country Profile of Mozambique prepared by Lourdes Fidalgo (ANSA ) and Carina Ismael (MOH) in collaboration with Rosanne Marchesich (ESNA-FAO). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers .
    [Show full text]