AMERICANS and SOVIETS AFTER the BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION by DAVID E. GREENSTEIN DISSERTATION Submitted in Partia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BETWEEN TWO WORLDS: AMERICANS AND SOVIETS AFTER THE BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION BY DAVID E. GREENSTEIN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2015 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Kristin Hoganson, Chair Professor Diane Koenker Associate Professor Emeritus Mark Leff Associate Professor Kathryn Oberdeck Professor Frank Costigliola, University of Connecticut ii Abstract This dissertation investigates the ways that migration and the ongoing legacies of imperialism shaped the United States’ engagement with the world in the early twentieth century. It focuses on interaction between Americans and Russian Soviets during an era marked by both multidirectional migration and the increasing deployment of American power abroad. In the decade after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Americans attempted to transform Russia through military occupation, humanitarian work, and the spread of cultural and industrial products. Between Two Worlds shows that such ventures were not unilateral extensions of American values and interests. Russian émigrés, workers, and refugees substantially affected American programs and even core questions about the United States’ role in the world and what it meant to be an American. This research also shows that rather than precursors to the cold war, American approaches to Russia were part of the history of early twentieth century imperialism. Chapters trace these interactions through a series of case studies. A chapter on economic connections engages histories of international business, labor, and migration during Ford Motor Company’s Russian operations. A study on cultural interaction examines the circulation of filmmaking techniques and sentimental narratives in the Russian and American motion picture industries. Solders’ on-the-ground encounters in the context of overlapping U.S. and Russian development projects are the focus of a chapter on the Allied military occupation of North Russia. A chapter on humanitarian intervention explores American famine relief projects in Soviet Russia and the pathways they opened and foreclosed for migrants. An epilogue follows the circumnavigation of a group of refugees and aid workers through outposts of U.S. empire. Highlighting movement and multidirectional interaction, these histories challenge pervasive narratives about Americans and Russians as nationally, ideologically, and culturally divergent. iii Table of Contents INTRODUCTION – AMERICAN EMPIRE, MIGRATION, AND BOLSHEVIK RUSSIA …...1 CHAPTER 1 – ASSEMBLING FORDIZM: THE PRODUCTION OF AUTOMOBILES, AMERICANS, AND BOLSHEVIKS IN DETROIT AND EARLY SOVIET RUSSIA ………34 CHAPTER 2 – WHEN BOLSHEVISM WAS A LOVE STORY: EMPIRE, ATTRACTION, AND CONNECTION IN AMERICAN AND RUSSIAN SILENT FILM…...77 CHAPTER 3 – “A MAN’S SIZE JOB:” IMPERIALISM, EMBODIMENT, AND TRANSFORMATION IN THE AMERICAN MILITARY INTERVENTION IN NORTH RUSSIA ….…………………………………………………………………………..145 CHAPTER 4 – BORDERS OF RELIEF: REPATRIATION, REFUGEE MIGRATION, AND AMERICAN HUMANITARIAN WORK IN AND OUT OF THE RUSSIAN FAMINE OF 1921 …………………………………………………………………….……….216 EPILOGUE – “HOME BY AMERICA:” THE PETROGRAD CHILDREN’S COLONY AND THE PATHWAYS OF AMERICAN EMPIRE……….……………………..271 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………………294 1 Introduction – American Empire, Migration, and Bolshevik Russia In 1919 a Russian peasant named Ivan with arms the length of the Neva River, heels as wide as the Caspian steppes, and 150,000,000 heads – one for each of his countrymen – waded across the Atlantic Ocean to fight hand-to-hand against a gigantic Woodrow Wilson whose top hat was the size of the Eiffel Tower. Their clash erased countries; some ran to Ivan with out- stretched hands, others headlong to Wilson, but no middle ground was left, and everything turned crimson red or whiter and whiter white. The shattering confrontation between the head of capitalist America and the Russian people, imagined by Soviet futurist poet Vladimir Mayakovsky, presaged many visions of a bipolar conflict between two giants that would later come to dominate understandings of the relationship between Soviet Russia and the United States.1 But were Soviet Russia and the United States fundamentally at odds as Mayakovsky imagined, destined to face off in an epic battle that would wash across and divide the entire world? The poet’s actual journey across the Atlantic to visit the United States five years later suggested a different narrative about the way that Americans and Russians interacted and pointed to different pathways of connection. Unlike Ivan, Mayakovsky could not walk right up to Chicago. Because his Soviet citizenship made it difficult for him to obtain a visa to enter the United States, he traveled a circuitous route that included stops in Havana, Cuba, and Vera Cruz, Mexico, before crossing the border into Laredo, Texas. Mayakovsky met with workers in Detroit and Chicago. In New York, Russian émigrés of various stripes were particularly keen to meet him. For his own part, Mayakovsky saw the United States not as an inevitable foe of Soviet 1 Vladimir Mayakovsky, “150,000,000,” Polnoe sobranie sochinennii (Moscow: Gos. izd. Khudozhestvennoi literatury, 1958); Patricia Blake, ed The Bedbug and Selected Poetry Max Hayward and George Reavey, trans. (New York: Meridian Books, 1960), 31; Edward James Brown, Russian Literature Since the Revolution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), 33-34; Michael Almereyda, ed. Night Wraps the Sky: Writings by and about Mayakovsky (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008), 151-158. 2 Russia but rather in some ways analogous to Russia’s past and in others to its potential future. While American workers lagged behind Soviets in generating revolutionary activity, Mayakovsky, like many Soviets, saw American technology and industry as models that would be used in the development of a new socialist world. Noting that American advancements had been achieved on the backs of workers, the poet also explained the present state of the country as a product of the way the United States interacted with the world, arguing that “the United States established the right to call itself ‘America’ by force, by means of dreadnoughts and dollars, putting fear into neighboring republics and colonies.” A poem he wrote during his visit imagined a future geologist reconstructing the America Mayakovsky saw from the Brooklyn Bridge: “He will say: ‘So this is the paw of steel that united the seas with the prairies, and it’s from here Europe strained to the West, having scattered Indian feathers to the winds.”2 Mayakovsky’s impressions during his visit to the United States provide more useful avenues for understanding engagement between Americans and Russian Soviets then an epic battle. The journey took him through Russian migrant communities, sites marked by the legacy of American imperialism, and centers of American technology, industry, and culture. His travel account suggested many possible paths for how Russians and Americans might relate to each other. Taking this variety of potential paths as a starting point, Between Two Worlds examines interaction between Americans and Russian Soviets during an era marked by both multidirectional migration and the increasing deployment of American power abroad. In the decade after the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Americans attempted to transform Russia through armed occupation, humanitarian work, and the spread of industrial and cultural products like those that Mayakovsky had admired on his trip. Although scholars have emphasized such 2 Vladimir Mayakovsky, My Discovery of America and “Brooklyn Bridge,” trans. Neil Cornwell, (London: Hesperus Press, [1926] 2005), 73, 126. 3 ventures as part of the expanding reach of American efforts to shape places around the world,3 this dissertation demonstrates that these were not one-way projections of American power. Russians including émigrés, workers, and refugees substantially affected American programs and even core questions about the United States’ role in the world and what it meant to be an American. Migrants like the Russian-Americans Mayakovsky met in New York and Detroit were not just the objects of humanitarian aid or the fuel for manufacturing projects; they were central in producing and challenging these endeavors. This dissertation also argues that rather than precursors to an epic cold war conflict, American approaches to Soviet Russia were part of the history of American imperialism. Echoing Mayakovsky’s poetic recognition that the “paw of steel” reaching across the North American continent had done so “having scattered Indian feathers to the wind,” I trace the ways that American efforts to shape Russia relied on narrative and material legacies drawn from prior and ongoing imperialism in the American West and overseas. Many Americans felt that the kinds of relationships that Mayakovsky noted had created “‘America’ by force” in its late nineteenth and early twentieth century interactions with “neighboring republics and colonies,” might be extended to places like Russia. They proposed that the mix of violence, benevolent uplift, and economic and cultural advancement that had aimed at shaping populations in and around the United States could also be used to direct Russia’s future. These focuses on migration and imperial visions to transform Russia offer a history of connection that departs from cold war narratives that describe Americans