DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 24 Issue 1 Fall 2013 Article 3 Human v. House: A Combat for Couture Command of Luxury Labels Carly Elizabeth Souther Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Carly E. Souther, Human v. House: A Combat for Couture Command of Luxury Labels, 24 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 49 (2013) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol24/iss1/3 This Lead Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Souther: Human v. House: A Combat for Couture Command of Luxury Labels HUMAN V. HOUSE: A COMBAT FOR COUTURE COMMAND OF LUXURY LABELS Carly Elizabeth Souther* ABSTRACT As an industry that thrives on-rather than succumbs to- adversity, the couture corporate world demands innovation and encourages risks. When combined with successful marketing and savvy business practices, these risks can result in large payoffs, which exist, primarily, due to the nature of the global fashion market.' Endless consumption drives the market, rewarding fashion houses that cater to current trends with top-line growth and damning those whom fail to suffer decreased net earnings. In order to remain a viable player in the fashion industry, the house must have the resources to market and manufacture the product in a timely manner, as well as incur the costs if a collection is poorly received.