Evolution of Communication in Gibbons (Hylobatidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolution of Communication in Gibbons (Hylobatidae) Evolution of Communication in Gibbons (Hylobatidae) Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der philosophlschen DoktorwOrde vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultat II der Universitat Zurich von THOMAS GEISSMANN von Hagglingen Begutachtet von den Herren Prof. Dr. R.D. Martin Dr. D.J. Chivers Zurich 1993 Zentralstelle der Studentenschaft Evolution of Communication in Gibbons (Hylobatidae) Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der philosophischen Doktorwürde vorgelegt der Philosophischen Fakultät II der Universität Zürich von THOMAS GEISSMANN von Hägglingen Begutachtet von den Herren Prof. Dr. R.D. Martin Dr. D.J. Chivers Zürich 1993 Zentralstelle der Studentenschaft Suggested citation: Geissmann, T. (1993). Evolution of communication in gibbons (Hylobatidae). Ph.D. thesis, Anthropological Institute, Philosophical Faculty II, Zürich University, Switzerland. iii + 374 pp. (English text, German summary). Contents: 1. Introduction ................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction to Gibbons.....................................................................1 1.2 Gibbon Ancestry...............................................................................2 1.3 Gibbon Systematics ..........................................................................4 1.4 Adopting a Systematic Framework....................................................7 1.5 Aims of the Present Study...............................................................10 2. Material and Methods...............................................................................14 2.1 General Methods.............................................................................14 2.2 Vocal Communication.....................................................................15 2.3 Olfactory Communication................................................................21 2.4 Visual Communication....................................................................32 2.5 Phylogenetic Evaluation ...................................................................33 3. Vocal Communication...............................................................................35 3.1 Introduction.....................................................................................35 3.2 Pure Species Vocalizations..............................................................43 3.3 Hybrid Vocalisations.......................................................................53 4. Olfactory Communication.........................................................................82 4.1 Introduction.....................................................................................82 4.2 Macroscopic Study .........................................................................97 4.3 Microscopic Study........................................................................118 4.4 Chemical Analysis.........................................................................124 5. Visual Communication............................................................................139 5.1 Description of Visual Characteristics ............................................139 5.2 Circumfacial Markings in Siamangs .............................................144 5.3 Body Weight.................................................................................155 6. Phylogenetic Evaluation..........................................................................162 6.1 Description of the Data Matrix......................................................162 6.2 Analysis of the Complete Data Matrix ..........................................162 6.3 Analysis of Subsets of the Data Matrix.........................................169 7. Discussion..............................................................................................174 7.1 Vocal Communication...................................................................174 7.2. Olfactory Communication..............................................................203 7.3 Visual Communication..................................................................215 7.4 Phylogenetic Evaluation .................................................................229 ii Evolution of Communication in Gibbons 8a. Summary ................................................................................................234 8b. Zusammenfassung..................................................................................240 9. References ..............................................................................................247 10. Appendices .............................................................................................278 Appendix 10.1: Tape-Recorded Songs of Hybrid Gibbons....................279 Appendix 10.2: Vocal Characteristics of Gibbons ..................................283 Appendix 10.3: Study Animals for Olfactory Communication ...............286 Appendix 10.4: Skin Secretions..............................................................302 Appendix 10.5: Olfactory Characteristics of Gibbons ............................307 Appendix 10.6: Visual Characteristics of Gibbons .................................308 Appendix 10.7: Key to Abbreviations for Museum Collections..............311 Appendix 10.8: Key to Abbreviations for Collectors ..............................312 Appendix 10.9: Individual Data on Body Weights .................................313 Appendix 10.10: Gazetteer......................................................................350 Appendix 10.11: "Non-communicatory" Characteristics of Gibbons .....365 Appendix 10.12: Data Matrix for Phylogenetic Evaluation.....................368 11. Acknowledgements.................................................................................371 12. Curriculum Vitae.....................................................................................374 "Whether the species maintain their individuality through geographical segregation, or whether, if they were to meet and mix, sexual and social instincts would still maintain the present arrangement of species, are matters upon which no information has as yet been given. But the fact that certain of these species (H. lar, H. pileatus, and H. hoolock), if not all, have voices which can be distinguished, tends to show there is a physiological differentiation, and the colour markings are very constant." (Keith, 1896) "Um zu wissen, ob ein Gebiet von dieser oder jener Art bewohnt sei, ist es übrigens nicht immer nötig, ans Land zu gehen; man kann zuverlässig feststellen, welche Art hier vorkommt. Die Stimme der Hylebatiden ist nämlich sehr laut und bei den einzelnen Arten sehr verschieden." (Volz, 1904) 1. Introduction 1 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction to Gibbons The gibbons, or lesser apes (Hylobates spp.), are distributed throughout the tropical rain forests of Southeast Asia (Chivers, 1977; Groves, 1972; Marshall & Sugardjito, 1986). They are unusual among primates in several respects which can be summarised under three key complexes: locomotion, social structure, and communication. Gibbons are strictly arboreal and mainly frugivorous (Chivers, 1984a; Leighton, 1987). Their arm-swinging form of locomotion (brachiation), unique suspensory behaviour and habitual erect posture represent extreme specialisations which evolved in connection with the animals' substrate and diet (Chivers, 1984b). Gibbons live in monogamous, territorial family groups (Brockelman & Srikosamatara, 1984; Chivers, 1984b; Leighton, 1987). In the wild, single offspring are born at intervals of approximately 3 years. Offspring remain with their parental family group until attaining sexual maturity at about 8 years of age, at which time they usually leave the group in order to find a mate and a territory. All species of gibbons are known to produce elaborate, species-specific and sex-specific patterns of vocalisation often referred to as "songs" (Haimoff, 1984a; Marshall & Marshall, 1976, 1978). Songs are loud and complex and are mainly uttered at specifically established times of day. In most species, mated pairs may characteristically combine their songs in a relatively rigid pattern to produce coordinated duet songs. Several functions have been attributed to gibbon songs, most of which emphasise a role in territorial advertisement, mate attraction and maintenance of pair and family bonds (Haimoff, 1984a; Leighton, 1987). 2 Evolution of Communication in Gibbons 1.2 Gibbon Ancestry Various fossil primates have at some time or other been proposed as possible ancestors of gibbons, including genera from the Oligocene such as Propliopithecus (= Aeolopithecus) and from the Miocene such as Crouzelia, Dendropithecus, Dionysopithecus, Laccopithecus, Limnopithecus, Micropithecus, Pliopithecus (see e.g. Barry et al., 1986; Fleagle, 1984; 1988). Most of them are probably too primitive to be gibbon ancestors and probably precede the radiation of living hominoids; in others, the critical cranial and postcranial material is not available (Fleagle, 1984; 1988). In many cases, phyletic relationship with hylobatids has been assumed on the basis of dentition (5-cusped, ape-like molars) and small body size. A major problem in tracing gibbon ancestry is that modern gibbons are defined as a clade mainly by derived postcranial features related to brachiation (Andrews & Groves, 1976), whereas, so far as known, none of the previous candidates for hylobatid ancestors seems to exhibit such features (Barry et al., 1986; Fleagle, 1984). On the other hand, gibbon
Recommended publications
  • Description of a New Species of Hoolock Gibbon (Primates: Hylobatidae) Based
    1 Title: Description of a new species of Hoolock gibbon (Primates: Hylobatidae) based 2 on integrative taxonomy 3 Peng-Fei Fan1,2#,*, Kai He3,4,#, *, Xing Chen3,#, Alejandra Ortiz5,6,7, Bin Zhang3, Chao 4 Zhao8, Yun-Qiao Li9, Hai-Bo Zhang10, Clare Kimock5,6, Wen-Zhi Wang3, Colin 5 Groves11, Samuel T. Turvey12, Christian Roos13, Kris M. Helgen4, Xue-Long Jiang3* 6 7 8 9 1. School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, P.R. China 10 2. Institute of Eastern-Himalaya Biodiversity Research, Dali University, Dali, 671003, 11 P.R. China 12 3. Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, 13 P.R. China 14 4. Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, 15 Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., 20013, USA 16 5. Center for the Study of Human Origins, Department of Anthropology, New York 17 University, New York, 10003, USA 18 6. New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology (NYCEP), New York, 10024, 19 USA 20 7. Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, 21 Arizona State University, Tempe, 85281, USA. 22 8. Cloud Mountain Conservation, Dali, 671003, P.R. China 1 23 9. Kunming Zoo, Kunming, 650021, P. R. China 24 10. Beijing Zoo, Beijing, 100044, P.R. China 25 11. School of Archaeology & Anthropology, Australian National University, Acton, 26 ACT 2601, Australia 27 12. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, NW1 4RY, London, UK 28 13. Gene Bank of Primates and Primate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, 29 Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 30 31 32 Short title: A new species of small ape 33 #: These authors contributed equally to this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2016 Newsletter
    Department Anthropology of Anthropology Newsletter Fall 2015 - Spring 2016 • Vol. 16 Transforming Lives Through Discovery! Welcome Archaeology Field School at Twin Pines 2015 uring the summer of 2015, students in the department of Anthropology The Anthropology students participated in an exciting six-week archaeological field school in the Gila National and alumni profiled here D Forest. Under the direction of Dr. Fumi Arakawa, NMSU professor and director of the are just a few of those University Museum, 16 undergraduate and 5 graduate students excavated the Twin Pines who have received funding Village. and recognition for their research. This is an important Classic Mimbres Phase Site (A.D. 1000- Thanks to new funding 1130) located south of Wall from the College of Arts Lake. The field school operated and Sciences, contributions in collaboration with U.S. from alumni and friends Forest Service archaeologists to the Dean’s Fund for Wendy Sutton and Chris Adams. Excellence and the “Friends Students participated in all phases of Anthropology”, we offer of archaeological fieldwork, grants of up to $500 for including site survey, excavation graduate research. mapping and in-field analysis. “They also had the opportunity We have funded to learn about stewardship of students working both archaeological resources, cultural internationally and 2015 NMSU archaeology field school at Twin Pines heritage management, and best locally, on projects practices for collaborative archaeological investigation,” said Dr. Alexander, head of as diverse as primate NMSU’s Department of Anthropology. behavior, stewardship of archaeological resources, "The project consists of an intensive excavation of a Classic Mimbres site which extends human responses to well back to the Pithouse period,” said Trevor Lea, one of four crew chiefs on the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbon Classification : the Issue of Species and Subspecies
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1988 Gibbon classification : the issue of species and subspecies Erin Lee Osterud Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, and the Genetics and Genomics Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Osterud, Erin Lee, "Gibbon classification : the issue of species and subspecies" (1988). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3925. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5809 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Erin Lee Osterud for the Master of Arts in Anthropology presented July 18, 1988. Title: Gibbon Classification: The Issue of Species and Subspecies. APPROVED BY MEM~ OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Marc R. Feldesman, Chairman Gibbon classification at the species and subspecies levels has been hotly debated for the last 200 years. This thesis explores the reasons for this debate. Authorities agree that siamang, concolor, kloss and hoolock are species, while there is complete lack of agreement on lar, agile, moloch, Mueller's and pileated. The disagreement results from the use and emphasis of different character traits, and from debate on the occurrence and importance of gene flow. GIBBON CLASSIFICATION: THE ISSUE OF SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES by ERIN LEE OSTERUD A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in ANTHROPOLOGY Portland State University 1989 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Erin Lee Osterud presented July 18, 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Primates of the Southern Mentawai Islands
    Primate Conservation 2018 (32): 193-203 The Status of Primates in the Southern Mentawai Islands, Indonesia Ahmad Yanuar1 and Jatna Supriatna2 1Department of Biology and Post-graduate Program in Biology Conservation, Tropical Biodiversity Conservation Center- Universitas Nasional, Jl. RM. Harsono, Jakarta, Indonesia 2Department of Biology, FMIPA and Research Center for Climate Change, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia Abstract: Populations of the primates native to the Mentawai Islands—Kloss’ gibbon Hylobates klossii, the Mentawai langur Presbytis potenziani, the Mentawai pig-tailed macaque Macaca pagensis, and the snub-nosed pig-tailed monkey Simias con- color—persist in disturbed and undisturbed forests and forest patches in Sipora, North Pagai and South Pagai. We used the line-transect method to survey primates in Sipora and the Pagai Islands and estimate their population densities. We walked 157.5 km and 185.6 km of line transects on Sipora and on the Pagai Islands, respectively, and obtained 93 sightings on Sipora and 109 sightings on the Pagai Islands. On Sipora, we estimated population densities for H. klossii, P. potenziani, and S. concolor in an area of 9.5 km², and M. pagensis in an area of 12.6 km². On the Pagai Islands, we estimated the population densities of the four primates in an area of 11.1 km². Simias concolor was found to have the lowest group densities on Sipora, whilst P. potenziani had the highest group densities. On the Pagai Islands, H. klossii was the least abundant and M. pagensis had the highest group densities. Primate populations, notably of the snub-nosed pig-tailed monkey and Kloss’ gibbon, are reduced and threatened on the southern Mentawai Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research
    Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Edited by Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham Chapters written in honour of Professor Colin P Groves Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Taxonomic tapestries : the threads of evolutionary, behavioural and conservation research / Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham, editors. ISBN: 9781925022360 (paperback) 9781925022377 (ebook) Subjects: Biology--Classification. Biology--Philosophy. Human ecology--Research. Coexistence of species--Research. Evolution (Biology)--Research. Taxonomists. Other Creators/Contributors: Behie, Alison M., editor. Oxenham, Marc F., editor. Dewey Number: 578.012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph courtesy of Hajarimanitra Rambeloarivony Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press Contents List of Contributors . .vii List of Figures and Tables . ix PART I 1. The Groves effect: 50 years of influence on behaviour, evolution and conservation research . 3 Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham PART II 2 . Characterisation of the endemic Sulawesi Lenomys meyeri (Muridae, Murinae) and the description of a new species of Lenomys . 13 Guy G Musser 3 . Gibbons and hominoid ancestry . 51 Peter Andrews and Richard J Johnson 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Mio-Pliocene European Primate Fossil Record: Dynamics and Habitat Tracking
    Journal of Human Evolution 47 (2004) 323e341 The Mio-Pliocene European primate fossil record: dynamics and habitat tracking Jussi T. Eronena,*, Lorenzo Rookb aDepartment of Geology, P.O. Box 64, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland bDipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Universita di Firenze, Via G.La Pira 4, 59121 Firenze, Italy Received 16 September 2003; accepted 13 August 2004 Abstract We present here a study of European Neogene primate occurrences in the context of changing humidity. We studied the differences of primate localities versus non-primate localities by using the mammal communities and the ecomorphological data of the taxa present in the communities. The distribution of primates is influenced by humidity changes during the whole Neogene, and the results suggest that the primates track the changes in humidity through time. The exception to this is the Superfamily Cercopithecoidea which shows a wider range of choices in habitats. All primate localities seem to differ from non-primate localities in that the mammal community structure is more closed habitat oriented, while in non-primate localities the community structure changes towards open-habitat oriented in the late Neogene. The differences in primate and non-primate localities are stronger during the times of deep environmental change, when primates are found in their preferred habitats and non-primate localities have faunas better able to adapt to changing conditions. Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: fossil primates; Cercopithecoidea; herbivore humidity proxy; hypsodonty; community structure; habitat tracking; Late Neogene; Europe Introduction look at the paleoecological scenarios for the temporal and geographical variation of different The Primate record of Europe is comparatively primate families and genera (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia
    Primate Conservation 2017 (31): 71-82 Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia Jatna Supriatna1,2, Asri A. Dwiyahreni2, Nurul Winarni2, Sri Mariati3,4 and Chris Margules2,5 ¹Department of Biology, FMIPA Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 2Research Center for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 3Postgraduate Program, Trisakti Institute for Tourism, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta, Indonesia 4Conservation International, Indonesia 5Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia Abstract: The severe declines in forest cover on Sumatra and adjacent islands have been well-documented but that has not slowed the rate of forest loss. Here we present recent data on deforestation rates and primate distribution patterns to argue, yet again, for action to avert potential extinctions of Sumatran primates in the near future. Maps of forest loss were constructed using GIS and satellite imagery. Maps of primate distributions were estimated from published studies, museum records and expert opinion, and the two were overlaid on one another. The extent of deforestation in the provinces of Sumatra between 2000 and 2012 varied from 3.74% (11,599.9 ha in Lampung) to 49.85% (1,844,804.3 ha in Riau), with the highest rates occurring in the provinces of Riau, Jambi, Bangka Belitung and South Sumatra. During that time six species lost 50% or more of their forest habitat: the Banded langur Presbytis femoralis lost 82%, the Black-and-white langur Presbytis bicolor lost 78%, the Black-crested Sumatran langur Presbytis melalophos and the Bangka slow loris Nycticebus bancanus both lost 62%, the Lar gibbon Hylobates lar lost 54%, and the Pale-thighed langur Presbytis siamensis lost 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radiographic Study of Human-Primate Commensalism
    Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects Series Editor Russell H. Tuttle Department of Anthropology The University of Chicago For further volumes, go to http://www.springer.com/series/5852 Sharon Gursky-Doyen ● Jatna Supriatna Editors Indonesian Primates Editors Sharon Gursky-Doyen Jatna Supriatna Department of Anthropology Conservation International Indonesia Texas A&M University University of Indonesia College Station, TX Jakarta USA Indonesia [email protected] [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-1559-7 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-1560-3 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1560-3 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2009942275 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) S.L. Gursky-Doyen dedicates this volume to her parents, Ronnie Bender and Burt Gursky, who after all these years still do not really know what she does, but they proudly display her books on their coffee table; and to her husband Jimmie who taught her what love is.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Ecology and Adaptation with an Emphasis on Hominoid Evolution
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1997 Aspects of Ecology and Adaptation with an Emphasis on hominoid Evolution Clare Katharine Stott University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Stott, Clare Katharine, "Aspects of Ecology and Adaptation with an Emphasis on hominoid Evolution. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1997. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4234 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Clare Katharine Stott entitled "Aspects of Ecology and Adaptation with an Emphasis on hominoid Evolution." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Andrew Kramer, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard Jantz, Lyle Konigsberg Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Clare K. Stott entitled "Aspects of Ecology and Adaptation with an Emphasis on Hominoid Evolution".
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Tapestries the Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research
    Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Taxonomic Tapestries The Threads of Evolutionary, Behavioural and Conservation Research Edited by Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham Chapters written in honour of Professor Colin P Groves Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Taxonomic tapestries : the threads of evolutionary, behavioural and conservation research / Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham, editors. ISBN: 9781925022360 (paperback) 9781925022377 (ebook) Subjects: Biology--Classification. Biology--Philosophy. Human ecology--Research. Coexistence of species--Research. Evolution (Biology)--Research. Taxonomists. Other Creators/Contributors: Behie, Alison M., editor. Oxenham, Marc F., editor. Dewey Number: 578.012 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press Cover photograph courtesy of Hajarimanitra Rambeloarivony Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2015 ANU Press Contents List of Contributors . .vii List of Figures and Tables . ix PART I 1. The Groves effect: 50 years of influence on behaviour, evolution and conservation research . 3 Alison M Behie and Marc F Oxenham PART II 2 . Characterisation of the endemic Sulawesi Lenomys meyeri (Muridae, Murinae) and the description of a new species of Lenomys . 13 Guy G Musser 3 . Gibbons and hominoid ancestry . 51 Peter Andrews and Richard J Johnson 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Closest Relatives of Primates Earliest True Primates Share
    Closest relatives of Primates Earliest true primates share: • Archonta • Inner ear morphology – Scandentia (tree shrews) • Postorbital bar, orbital convergence – Dermoptera (flying lemurs) • Large brain case with large orbits – Chiroptera (bats) • Modifications of the elbow • Plesiadapiformes • Elongation of the heel, opposable thumb – Paleocene radiation of unusual critters and nails (instead of claws) – Replaced by rodents – Put in and out of Primate order Eocene Oligocene • Lots of fossils from N America and Europe; little • Continents mostly in present positions from Africa or Asia; • S America and Australia separate from • Prosimians anatomically and likely behaviorally Antarctica • Adapoids and Omomyoids, ecologically diverse; • Best site is Fayum, Egypt 28-32 my very similar early so likely monophyly Lemurs, Lorises • Adapoids like higher primates with large size, • , early anthropoid primates diurnality, frugivory and folivory (feet like lemurs) • Propliopithecus and Aegyptopithecus • Omomyoids more similar to galagos but • Dental apes but New World monkey bodies increase in size and folivorous late • Late Oligocene settling of S. America by • Where are prosimians lately? anthropoid primates Relationships based on fossils and Monkey Evolution molecular evidence • Hominoid and cercopithecoid apomorphies • New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini) show up in Oligocene, primitive versions by Miocene and at 20 and 18 my thereafter look very much like modern forms • Gibbons and Siamangs at 17 my • Old World Monkeys (Catarrhini) show up in Miocene (after apes); Victoriapithecus and then • Orang utans at 12 my split between colobines and cercopithecines; lots of evolutionary change late and lots of • Gorillas at 9 my convergences make systematics challenging • Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus at 6 my • Also absence of fossils from many lineages • Very successful lately; out competing most apes • Putting chimp vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Information Bulletin, Vol. 35, Part 1
    vol. R 35 / 1 2012 F ST A ICAN IN TR A Y year 2012 G P A A E N PAAT O M M S O A M R O G S O Programme ISSN 1812-2442 I R S P volume 35 Against African part 1 Trypanosomosis TSETSE AND TRYPANOSOMOSIS INFORMATION Department for International Development FAO year 2012 PAAT Programme volume 35 Against African part 1 Trypanosomosis TSETSE AND TRYPANOSOMOSIS INFORMATION Numbers 16037-16293 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2012 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specic companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reect the views of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-107434-3 All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Ofce of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]