Settler Agnosia in the Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Settler Agnosia in the Field Anthropology Publications Anthropology 8-2016 Settler agnosia in the field: Indigenous action, functional ignorance, and the origins of ethnographic entrapment Grant Arndt Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/anthr_pubs Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ anthr_pubs/29. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Settler agnosia in the field: Indigenous action, functional ignorance, and the origins of ethnographic entrapment Abstract In the late 1930s a novice fieldworker from the University of Chicago wrote in his field notes that his collaboration with a Ho-Chunk interpreter had failed because of the interpreter's “aggressions” in the struggle for “white class status.” The notes exhibit a pattern of perceptual failure that I call “settler agnosia,” elements of which have been noted in research on the obstacles facing Indigenous activists. The case shows that the tendency of older anthropological accounts of contemporary American Indian life to obscure evidence of both colonial oppression and Indigenous action may have originated as consequences of a form of functional ignorance triggered by interpersonal struggles over position in the everyday relations of settler society. An ethnographic investigation of the links between settler agnosia and the practice of settlerness connects perception in everyday interactions to larger issues of knowledge production in and of settler societies. Keywords settler colonialism, field theory, Bordieu, race, ignorance, indigeneity, Native North America Disciplines Indigenous Studies | Social and Cultural Anthropology Comments This article is from American Ethnologist 43 (2016): 465–474, doi:10.1111/amet.12339. Posted with permission. This article is available at Iowa State University Digital Repository: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/anthr_pubs/29 GRANT ARNDT Iowa State University Settler agnosia in the field: Indigenous action, functional ignorance, and the origins of ethnographic entrapment ABSTRACT n September 1938, Leo Srole, a doctoral student in the Department In the late 1930s a novice fieldworker from the of Anthropology at the University of Chicago, traveled to the Wis- University of Chicago wrote in his field notes that consin Dells to begin a year of field research on Ho-Chunk (Win- his collaboration with a Ho-Chunk interpreter had nebago) social organization and cultural change. One of his first failed because of the interpreter’s “aggressions” in interviews was with Phyllis Crandall-Connor, the Anglo-American the struggle for “white class status.” The notes Iartistic director of The Stand Rock Indian Ceremonial, a tourist pageant in exhibit a pattern of perceptual failure that I call which Ho-Chunk people had performed for two decades. Crandall-Connor “settler agnosia,” elements of which have been complained to Srole that her Ho-Chunk employees refused to perform noted in research on the obstacles facing many of their traditional dances for tourists, ascribing their defiance to Indigenous activists. The case shows that the their “childlike” nature. She added, “The negro knows his place, but the tendency of older anthropological accounts of Indian doesn’t know how to act. You have to be careful about what you say contemporary American Indian life to obscure or he’ll walk out on you” (Srole 1938d, 6). In the typescript of his interview evidence of both colonial oppression and Indigenous with Crandall-Connor, Srole offered no comment on the remark but noted action may have originated as consequences of a elsewhere in his field notes that form of functional ignorance triggered by interpersonal struggles over position in the everyday the white attitude hereabouts seems to be a clear-cut case of ambiva- relations of settler society. An ethnographic lence. On the one hand the Indian is looked upon as something of a investigation of the links between settler agnosia museum piece, the remnant of a glorious, colorful tradition in Amer- and the practice of settlerness connects perception ican history, which has been especially memorialized in the school- in everyday interactions to larger issues of booksofchildren....Butontheotherhand,therearealmostcaste- knowledge production in and of settler societies. like attitudes and evaluations of the Indian, expressed in such words [settler colonialism, field theory, Bourdieu, race, as “dirty, stinking, drunken, thieving, lying.” (1938c, 4) ignorance, indigeneity, Native North America] Srole had come to the Dells in 1938 specifically to recruit James Daybreak, the Ho-Chunk master of ceremonies in Crandall-Connor’s tourist show, to be his guide and interpreter.1 Having worked for previous researchers, Daybreak promised to be an especially valuable contact for Srole because, in addition to his work at Stand Rock, he participated in “most of the ceremonies of the conservative or traditionalist religious faction” and was an initiated member of the Medicine Lodge, a status “unusual for one of his generation” (Srole 1938b, 14). But Srole and Daybreak’s collaboration did not last long. From the beginning, Daybreak criticized “white people who come to the Indians to get all they can out of them and give nothing in return,” and when the two visited Ho-Chunk households, he seemed to interfere in Srole’s efforts to document kinship AMERICAN ETHNOLOGIST, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 465–474, ISSN 0094-0496, online ISSN 1548-1425. C 2016 by the American Anthropological Association. All rights reserved. DOI: 10.1111/amet.12339 American Ethnologist Volume 43 Number 3 August 2016 and ceremonial activities (Srole 1938b, 4). In response, Clifford and Marcus 1986; Hymes 1972; Povinelli 2002; Srole broke off the collaboration and sent his supervisors at Turner 1991). Such concerns have reshaped anthropolog- the University of Chicago a 33-page account of Daybreak’s ical accounts of Native North America, leading anthro- “personality” in which he depicted Daybreak as marked by pologists to reflect on the complicated legacies of the a set of “aggressions” linked to the pursuit of “white class “Americanist tradition” (Briggs and Bauman 1999; Buckley status” (3, 6). 1996; Field 1999; Lewis 1998; Simpson 2007; Valentine and Srole continued his research after he stopped working Darnell 2007) and to create new ethnographic accounts that with Daybreak, eventually interviewing 22 Ho-Chunks and emphasize the agency of Indian peoples, past and present, 17 whites. He learned from both groups about the strained in struggles against dispossession and racism (Biolsi and race relations in the region, and his research included re- Zimmerman 1997; Cadena and Starn 2007; Strong 2005; see ports of recent mass meetings held by white residents who also Cattelino 2008; Dennison 2012; Fowler 2004; Lambert opposed the integration of Ho-Chunk students into local 2007; Nesper 2002; Richland 2008; Simpson 2014). Srole’s schools (Srole 1939a, 1939b, 1939c). The material he col- field notes suggest that an understanding of how ethnogra- lected substantiates the contention he expressed in a March phies carried out within settler-colonial contexts can entrap 15, 1939, letter to his advisers that he could write a study Indigenous people can look to the experiences created by “unlike (for better or worse) any other study of an Amer- the interpersonal politics in the colonial field, and the rela- ican Indian tribe” because he could describe and define tionship between racism, indigeneity, and settlerness. “exactly the nature and extent of the relations and status Settlerness, or “whiteness in settler contexts” (Veracini of the Winnebagoes in white society, the attitudes of both 2011, 9), names the position of privilege vis-a-vis` indigene- Winnebago and whites to each other and to their relations” ity within settler society.3 The position represents, in the (Srole 1939d, 1). Yet in Srole’s notes for a never-completed words of Audra Simpson, the “stable ontological core [and] monograph based on his research, he focused not on the unquestioned ‘self’” (2007, 70) that exists largely unmarked causes of the tense local race relations or white hostility to- in institutional and everyday contexts. As unmarked, it ward Indians, but rather on the breakdown of Ho-Chunk has often been invisible to white scholars and persons culture and the “instability” of the Ho-Chunk “personality” (Moreton-Robinson 2004). Its invisibility relative to Indige- (Srole 1939e). nous difference is sustained in part by what Mark Rifkin has Srole’s turn to personality despite the evidence of called a “settler common sense” that comprises an “embod- racism he documented will not surprise those familiar with ied set . of sensations, dispositions, and lived trajectories” the history of anthropological studies of American Indian that shape action in the “field of possibility” constituted acculturation (for bibliographies, see Keesing 1952; Siegel by settler society (Rifkin 2014, 8–9, 12–16; see also Rifkin 1955). Many anthropological accounts during the era of 2012). his research
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Ruth Landes Papers, 1928-1992
    Guide to the Ruth Landes papers, 1928-1992 John Glenn and Lorain Wang The revision of this finding aid and digitization of portions of the collection were made possible through the financial support of the Ruth Landes Memorial Research Fund. 1992, 2010 National Anthropological Archives Museum Support Center 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland 20746 [email protected] http://www.anthropology.si.edu/naa/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 8 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 4 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 7 Bibliography: Books......................................................................................................... 8 Bibliography: Articles and Essays................................................................................... 9 Bibliography: Book Reviews.......................................................................................... 10 Names and Subjects .................................................................................................... 11 Container Listing ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fay-Cooper Cole, 1881-1961 Author(S): Fred Eggan Reviewed Work(S): Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol
    Fay-Cooper Cole, 1881-1961 Author(s): Fred Eggan Reviewed work(s): Source: American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 65, No. 3, Part 1 (Jun., 1963), pp. 641-648 Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the American Anthropological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/667373 . Accessed: 08/12/2011 13:11 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Blackwell Publishing and American Anthropological Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Anthropologist. http://www.jstor.org FAY-COOPER COLE 1881-1961 W ITH THE DEATH of Fay-Cooper Cole in Santa Barbara September 3, 1961, the anthropological profession has lost another one of its major figures. He was not only a world authority on the peoples and cultures of Malaysia, and one of the founders of modern archeology, but also a great administrator and developer of men and institutions and a warm and friendly human being. During his long career, which spanned more than half a century, he was in addition one of our foremost interpreters of anthropology to the general public, an activity which he continued after his retirement from the chairmanship of the Department of Anthropology at the University of Chicago in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indians: Social Justice and Public Policy. Ethnicity and Public Policy Series, Volume IX
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 351 157 RC 018 834 AUTHOR Green, Donald E., Ed.; Tonnesen, Thomas V., Ed. TITLE American Indians: Social Justice and Public Policy. Ethnicity and Public Policy Series, Volume IX. INSTITUTION Wisconsin Univ. System, Milwaukee. Inst. on Race and Ethnicity. REPORT NO ISBN-0-942672-16-X PUB DATE 91 NOTE 282p.; For selected individual papers, see RC 018 835-837. AVAILABLE FROMUniversity of Wisconsin System, Institute on Race and Ethnicity, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201. PUB TYPE Books (010) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE HF01/PC12 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS American Indian Education; *American Indian History; *American Indians; Court Litigation; Disadvantaged; Elementary Secondary Education; Ethnicity; *Federal Indian Relationship; Federal Legislation; Higher Education; *Public Policy; *Self Determination IDENTIFIERS *Social Justice ABSTRACT This book discusses legal and social aspects of public policy in American society and their relationship to fulfilling the promise of social justice for American Indians.U.S. public policy is viewed as reflecting the collective sentimentsof the electorate. If the American people have the will to bringabout change in the socioeconomic conditions of American Indians, it will be evidenced in public policies. Chapters are: "'Irlian Law,' Indians' Law, and Legalism in American Indian Policy: AnEssay on Historical Origins," by Russel L. Barsn; "The Concept of Sovereignty: The Key to Social Justice," by Sharon O'Brien; "Organizingfor Self-Determination: Federal and Tribal Bureaucracies inan Era of Social and Policy Change," by Paul H. Stuart; "The Persistenceof Identity in Indian Communities of the Western Great Lakes,"by Donald L. Fixico; "The Delivery of Health Care to American Indians: History, Policies and Prospects," by Jennie Joe; "The Education of American Indians: Policy, Practice and Future Direction," by JohnW.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Departments of Anthropology.' School
    4 9 ANTHROPOLOGY AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION: FREDERICK STARR AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO, 1892-1923 R. Berkeley Miller Department of Sociology Brown University Providence, Rhode Island Within the history of social science, it is well on general principles, against the appointment of known that the first department of sociology in instructors otherwise than by nomination, or the United States was formed with the opening of previous consultation of the heads of departments" the University of Chicago in 1892. It is perhaps less (UPP: Small to Harper, 26 February 1892). Short- well known that this department was, in fact, the ly thereafter, Small overcame his objections and Department of Social Science and Anthropology- wrote to Harper that changed a year later to the Department of Soci- Dr. Starr is quite right-that the work in anthropol- ology and Anthropology-making it also one of the ogy is capable of broadening into a full department or earliest departments of anthropology.' school. I wish to be a learner from Dr. Starr in his For field, and in no case . should I desire to limit his William Rainey Harper, first president of the work by any attempt to direct matters which he is an University of Chicago, recruiting faculty for the authority and I am not [WRH: Small to Harper, 26 new university proved to be exceedingly difficult March 1892]. (Ryan 1939). Before anyone had been appointed Small then insisted that a place for Starr's program in Frederick head of at sociology, Starr, ethnology be found within the threefold division Small had the American Museum of Natural History and a planned-'historical sociology,' 'contemporary sociol- past associate of President Harper, decided to ogy,' and 'constructive sociology': '.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malinowski Award Papers
    The Dynamics of Applied Anthropology in the Twentieth Century: The Malinowski Award Papers Thomas Weaver Editor and Contributor of Introductory Materials Society for Applied Anthropology Oklahoma City 2002 ii Series Editor: Patricia J. Higgins, Plattsburgh State University Production Designer: Neil Hann, Society for Applied Anthropology, Oklahoma City Production Manager: J. Thomas May, Society for Applied Anthropology, Oklahoma City Copyright 2002 by the Society for Applied Anthropology All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or in any means without permission except in the context of reviews. All inquiries should be addressed to the Society for Applied Anthropology, P.O. Box 24093, Oklahoma City, 73124. Essays in chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 were previously published in Human Organization. The essay in chapter 23 was previously published in The Future of Anthropology: Its Relevance to the Contemporary World, Akbar S. Ahmed and Cris N. Shore, eds. (London: Athlone, 1995). iii Contents vii Acknowledgements viii About the Editor 1 Chapter 1: The Malinowski Award and the History of Applied Anthropology Thomas Weaver 14 Chapter 2: Malinowski as Applied Anthropologist Thomas Weaver 34 Chapter 3: Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán: Applied Anthropology and Indigenous Policy Thomas Weaver 38 Applied Anthropology in Mexico Gonzalo Aguirre Beltrán (Tucson 1973) 45 Chapter 4: Everett C. Hughes: Urban Sociology, Social Problems, and Ethics Thomas Weaver 48 Who Studies Whom? Everett C. Hughes (Boston 1974) 59 Chapter 5: Gunnar Myrdal: Interdisciplinary Research, Policy Science, and Racism Thomas Weaver 62 The Unity of the Social Sciences Gunnar Myrdal (Amsterdam 1975) 69 Chapter 6: Edward H.
    [Show full text]
  • News of the National Anthropological Archives
    History of Anthropology Newsletter Volume 4 Issue 1 1977 Article 3 January 1977 News of the National Anthropological Archives James Glenn Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Glenn, James (1977) "News of the National Anthropological Archives," History of Anthropology Newsletter: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol4/iss1/3 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/han/vol4/iss1/3 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3 SOURCES FOR THE HISTORY OF ANTHROPOLOGY NEWS OF THE NATIONAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHIVES James Glenn Smithsonian Institution Last December the Smithsonian Institution's National Anthro- pological Archives began a long-term project to arrange, describe, and pub- lish on microfilm its extensive collection of papers of John P. Harrington. An ethnologist and linguist with the Bureau of American Ethnology from 1915 to 1945, Harrington amassed over two hundred cubic feet of field notes and other material relating to Indians of all parts of the United States. He is best remembered for his work among California tribes. His material is difficult to describe briefly, for it ranges from verb paradigms to copies of several versions of Boscana's Chinigchinich, and the nature and quantity of data vary considerably from tribe to tribe. Many researchers have marveled at Harrington's dedicated efforts to record as much as he could of fading cultures, but they have often been especially delighted by stray facts contained in faithfully recorded digressions of his own or his informants.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Roots of Key Anthropologists
    SELECTIONS FROM ASSESSING CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY Robert Borofsky, editor (1994) New York: McGraw-Hill FREDRIK BARTH is currently Research Fellow under the Norwegian Ministry of Culture and Professor of Anthropology at Emory University. He has previously taught at the universities of Oslo and Bergen, and as a visitor at various American departments of anthropology. He has carried out research in a number of areas, starting in the Middle East with a focus on tribal politics and ecology. His best known works from this period are: Political Leadership among Swat Pathans (1959), Nomads of South Persia (1961), Models of Social Organization (1964), and the edited work Ethnic Groups and Boundaries (1969). Later, he has also done fieldwork in New Guinea and Southeast Asia, and among his publications are Ritual and Knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea (1975) and Cosmologies in the Making (1987). A monograph entitled Balinese Worlds will appear in 1993. "After a wartime childhood in Norway, I started at the University of Chicago with an interest in paleontology and human evolution. But the active and rich teaching program of Fred Eggan, Sol Tax, Robert Redfield and others broadened my intellectual horizon and led, after an interlude on a dig in Iraq with Bob Braidwood, to my choice of social anthropology as the focus of my work. My foundations derived indirectly from Radcliffe-Brown, who had taught my teachers during the 1930s. "Like many of my Chicago cohort, I went on to further studies in England. I chose the L.S.E. Autobiographies: 2 and developed a life-long association with Raymond Firth and, even more importantly, with Edmund Leach, whom I later followed to Cambridge for my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Second World War Anthropology Peripheral, Persuasive and Ignored Contributions
    Lessons from Second World War anthropology Peripheral, persuasive and ignored contributions DAVID PRICE Anthropologists were largely called upon to contribute their World War II and other past wars must be viewed in the David Price is Associate specialized knowledge to the war effort. The nature of the con- historical context of their times. The international anthro- Professor of Anthropology, St. tacts they had established with native peoples the world over pological community needs to be aware of past anthropo- Martin's College, Lacey, and the methods they had developed for understanding varied Washington, USA. A modes of life permitted them to give realistic aid to intelligence logical contributions to war, and we need to critically forthcoming essay examines units, or to those carrying on economic and psychological war- evaluate these past activities not in order to criticize past some of the ways in which fare and to advise concerning many types of postwar programs anthropologists, but to help provide a framework for anthropological interactions with military and intelligence of rehabilitation. coping with present and future pressures for anthropolo- agencies in the Cold War ‘Anthropology 1944’ gists to contribute to military and intelligence operations. became increasingly Britannica Book of the Year 1944 While past wartime anthropological decisions may be seen complicated and ignored. His as appropriate for their times, the context of contemporary email is [email protected]. The well established links between anthropologists and wars raises many more complex and problematic issues. colonialism documented in the work of scholars like Talal Asad, Kathleen Gough, Dell Hymes, Adam Kuper and WWII: Anthropological warfare comes of age George Stocking stand in marked contrast with the sparse The First World War brought a significant anthropological I am grateful for comments from analysis of anthropological contributions to the wars of the showdown, with implications for the wars that followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lindee and Radin, Patrons of the Human Experience.Pdf
    S218 Current Anthropology Volume 57, Supplement 14, October 2016 Patrons of the Human Experience A History of the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 1941–2016 by Susan Lindee and Joanna Radin The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research has played a critical but little-understood role in the development of the social and biological sciences since 1941. For anthropology particularly, its programs have often helped redefine scholarly priorities and research trajectories. Its grants to doctoral students have functioned as an important early sign of scholarly legitimacy, a mark of belonging to the profession. The foundation’s history also re- flects general transformations in scientific patronage as new landscapes of federal, military, and private funding re- configured opportunities in the social sciences. In this account we track the evolution of the foundation in tandem with the evolution of anthropology during a period of dramatic change after 1941, looking at the Second World War context from which the foundation emerged and the ideas and experiences of those who played a key role in this his- tory. We examine the long-term influence of a philanthropic foundation on the postwar emergence of an interna- tionally oriented anthropology from a tiny, almost clubby discipline with a few key institutions and leaders to a major academic and scientific enterprise with sometimes revolutionary ideas about evolution, human biology, race, culture, power, gender, and social order. An international symposium of the Wenner-Gren Foundation send gushing letters of gratitude, admiration, and indebtedness. for Anthropological Research (WGF) is often remembered An invitation to a Wenner-Gren symposium is still a delightful by participants as a rare pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • CSAS HISTORY: the EARLY YEARS by Barry L
    CSAS HISTORY: THE EARLY YEARS by Barry L. Isaac University of Cincinnati January 2001 Reformatted version November 2011 posted on the CSAS website at http://www.aaanet.org/sections/csas TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE CHAPTER I — THE FIRST DECADE: 1921 THROUGH 1930 1.0. The Founding of the Central Section (1921) 2.0. The Annual Business Meeting, 1922-1930 2.1. Financial Relationship with the AAA 2.2. Rebuke to Warren K. Moorehead (1923) 2.3. Membership 2.4. Publication Subvention 3.0. First-Decade Officers (1922-1930) 3.1. Presidents 3.2. Vice-Presidents 3.3. Secretary-Treasurers 3.4. Conclusions 4.0. Executive Committee and Council 5.0. The Scholarly Program (1922-1930) 5.1. Physical Anthropology 5.2. Linguistics 5.3. Archaeology 5.4. Ethnology CHAPTER II — THREE CRISES: 1930s TO 1950s 1.0. The Great Depression 2.0. World War II 3.0. The Defection of the Archaeologists REFERENCES CITED PREFACE When I became CSAS Secretary-Treasurer in 1974, the Society's history was the subject of much discussion. Even the correct ordinal numbering of the annual meetings was debated. My predecessor, Carl Jantzen, urged me to help clarify such matters. He had already organized the Society's existing portable file of records, which had been shipped from one Secretary-Treasurer to the next ever since George R. Fox, elected in 1924, had vacated the office in 1939. I eventually wrote three papers on CSAS history and presented them as plenary addresses at the 1978, 1979, and 1980 annual meetings, and distributed mimeographed versions totaling 128 single-spaced pages (79 of text, 49 of tables and figures).
    [Show full text]
  • 15/2/21 Liberal Arts and Sciences Anthropology Julian H. Steward Papers, 1842-1980 Box 1: CORRESPONDENCE, 1946-62
    15/2/21 Liberal Arts and Sciences Anthropology Julian H. Steward Papers, 1842-1980 Box 1: CORRESPONDENCE, 1946-62 David F. Aberle, 1954 Correspondence re: reviews and publications Robert M. Adams, 1954, 1955, 1958 American Antiquity, 1954-55 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1953-54 1957-58 American Anthropological Association, 1952-55 Correspondence re: Reece Committee investigation of the AAA, the AAA Viking Fund Award Committee, Indian Claims Commission hearings, and Steward's refusal of the editorship of American Anthropologist. Correspondents include Melville J. Herskovits, Frederick Johnson, Cora DuBois, Fred Eggan, Waldo Wedel, and Sol Tax. (NOTE: Although labelled "Johnson, Frederick, 1952-55," this folder contained letters with the notation "FILE AAA.") 1957-58 Newsletters, correspondence, programs, budgets, and reports American Association of University Professors, University of Illinois Chapter, 1953-54, 1958 American Ethnological Society, 1957-58 American Indian Ethnohistoric Conference, 1956-1958 Newsletters and conference program for 5th Annual Meeting, November 28-30, 1957. American Philosophical Society, 1959-60 Steward's referee comments on "Symposium on Studies in Evolution: Ideology and Socio-economic Structure" manuscript. American Sociological Society (2 folders), 1953-57, 1958 Correspondence, bulletins, reports, and conference programs. Angelo Anastasio, 1948, 1953 Correspondence re: Anastasio's PhD thesis on the "areal matrix." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1952-54 Anthropological Society of Washington, 1955-56 Invitations to lecture, declined. An Anthropologist at Work by Margaret Mead (Review by Steward in Science, v. 129, no. 3345), 1959 Conrad Arensberg, 1952-53, 1959 Robert G. Armstrong, 1953-56 Field worker for the Puerto Rico Project, Armstrong declined an offer to do field work in East Africa for the Cross-Cultural Regularities Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Fred Eggan Papers 1870-1991
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Fred Eggan Papers 1870-1991 © 2013 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Acknowledgments 5 Descriptive Summary 5 Information on Use 5 Access 5 Citation 5 Biographical Note 6 Scope Note 8 Related Resources 9 Subject Headings 10 INVENTORY 11 Series I: Biographical Materials 11 Subseries 1: Personal Papers 11 Subseries 2: Appointments, Awards, and Lectureships 12 Subseries 3: Assessments and Critiques of Eggan's Work 14 Series II: Correspondence 15 Series III: Figures in Anthropology 51 Subseries 1: General 52 Subseries 2: Lewis Henry Morgan 55 Subseries 3: Alfred Reginald Radcliffe-Brown 56 Subseries 4: Edward Sapir 60 Subseries 5: H. R. Voth Collection 60 Series IV: Theory and Method 64 Subseries 1: General 64 Subseries 2: Historical Perspectives 65 Subseries 3: Cultural and Ethnological Theory 66 Subseries 4: Research Methodologies 68 Subseries 5: Social Organization 71 Subseries 6: Development and Change 76 Series V: World Ethnography 78 Subseries 1: General 78 Subseries 2: Africa 78 Subseries 3: Asia 79 Subseries 4: Australia and Oceania 85 Subseries 5: Europe 89 Subseries 6: North America 90 Subseries 7: Mesoamerica 91 Subseries 8: South America 92 Subseries 9: Maps and Charts 94 Series VI: North American Indian Files 95 Subseries 1: General 95 Subseries 2: Arctic 98 Subseries 3: Western Sub-Arctic 99 Subseries 4: Eastern Sub-Arctic 101 Subseries 5: Northeast 102 Subseries 6: Southeast 106 Subseries 7: Plains 108 Subseries 8: Great Basin 116 Subseries 9: Plateau 119 Subseries 10:
    [Show full text]