Alliance for Disaster Risk Reduction (ALTER) Project Geghi Reservoir

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alliance for Disaster Risk Reduction (ALTER) Project Geghi Reservoir Alliance for Disaster Risk Reduction (ALTER) Project WP4: Transfer of Methods Geghi Reservoir and Geghanoush Tailing Dam Break Analysis: Methodology, Software and Data Requirements Prepared by: Alexander Arakelyan, Ph.D GIS and Hydrology Expert Yerevan, Armenia December, 2018 Contents LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF WORK ................................................................................................................ 6 2. OBJECTS OF THE STUDY ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 WATER RESERVOIR: GEGHI .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 TAILING DAM: GEGHANOUSH ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 DAM BREACH ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.1 Dam Failure Types.............................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.2 Breach Characteristics Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.2.1 Federal Agency Guidelines ........................................................................................................................................... 10 3.1.2.2 Regression Equations ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2.3 Physically-Based Breach Computer Models ................................................................................................................. 15 3.2 PEAK FLOW EQUATIONS AND ENVELOPE CURVES ............................................................................................................... 17 3.4 TAILING DAM BREACH OUTFLOW CALCULATION ................................................................................................................ 18 3.5 FLOOD MODELING: ONE-DIMENSIONAL AND TWO-DIMENSIONAL HYDRAULIC MODELS ............................................................ 22 3.5 FLUID DYNAMICS: STEADY AND UNSTEADY FLOW ............................................................................................................... 23 3.6 MANNING EQUATION AND N VALUES .............................................................................................................................. 25 3.7 POPULAR MODELS FOR DAM BREAK ANALYSIS AND FLOOD MAPPING .................................................................................... 29 4. REQUIRED DATA FOR DAM BREAK(CH) ANALYSIS AND MAPPING .......................................................................... 33 4.1 HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION DATA ................................................................................................................. 33 4.1.1 Meteorological Data ........................................................................................................................................ 33 4.1.2 Hydrological Data ............................................................................................................................................ 34 4.2 ELEVATION DATA AND ITS DERIVATIVES ............................................................................................................................ 35 4.3 LAND COVER ............................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.4 OTHER SPATIAL DATA ................................................................................................................................................... 37 5. DAM BREAK ANALYSIS AND FLOOD MAPPING IMPLEMENTATION......................................................................... 39 5.1 FLOOD HAZARD INDEX CALCULATION ............................................................................................................................... 39 5.2 RIVER MAXIMUM FLOW ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 44 5.3 DAM BREACH MAXIMUM OUTFLOW AND BREACH HYDROGRAPH CALCULATION ...................................................................... 45 6. CONCLUSIONS AND NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................ 48 7. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 ANNEX 1. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM FLOW OF DEIFFERENT PROBABILITIES FOR GEGHI-GEGHI HYDROPOST ....... 54 ANNEX 2. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM FLOW OF DEIFFERENT PROBABILITIES FOR GEGHI-KAVCHUT HYDROPOST .. 56 ANNEX 3. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM FLOW OF DEIFFERENT PROBABILITIES FOR VOGHJI-KAJARAN HYDROPOST 58 ANNEX 4. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM FLOW OF DEIFFERENT PROBABILITIES FOR VOGHJI-KAPAN HYDROPOST .... 61 ANNEX 5. CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM FLOW OF DEIFFERENT PROBABILITIES FOR GEGHANOUSH-GEGHANOUSH HYDROPOST ............................................................................................................................................................... 64 2 List of Tables Table 1. Possible Failure Modes for Various Dam Types ........................................................................ 10 Table 2. Ranges of Possible Values for Breach Characteristics ............................................................. 10 Table 3. Values of Cb from Reservoir Size ................................................................................................. 14 Table 4. Physically-Based Embankment Dam Breach Computer Models ............................................ 16 Table 5. Summary of the New Erosion Process Models .......................................................................... 16 Table 6. Differences between one- and two-dimensional models .......................................................... 22 Table 7. Manning's n for Channels (Chow, 1959) ..................................................................................... 26 Table 8. Comparison of dam break software ............................................................................................. 30 Table 9. Operational Monitoring Stations within Voghji River Basin ...................................................... 33 Table 10. Annual and monthly average air temperatures in the Voghji River Basin, օC ..................... 34 Table 11. Intra-annual distribution of atmospheric precipitation in the Voghji River Basin, mm ........ 34 Table 12. Cumulative Evaporation in the Voghji River Basin, According to Altitude Zones ............... 34 Table 13. Hydrological Monitoring Posts within Voghji River Basin ....................................................... 35 Table 14. Flow Characteristics in the Hydrological Monitoring Posts within Geghi River Basin ........ 35 Table 15. Classes, Rating and According Weights of FHI Assessment Parameters .......................... 40 Table 16. Classes, Rating and According Weights of FHI Assessment Parameters .......................... 40 Table 17. Maximum Flows of Different Probabilities Calculated for Hydroposts of Voghji River Basin* ............................................................................................................................................................... 44 Table 18. Necessary Input Data for TR-60 and TR-66 Models .............................................................. 45 Table 19. Calculated Values of Geghi Dam Breach Outflow and Timesteps using TR-60 and TR-66 models .............................................................................................................................................................. 46 3 List of Figures Figure 1. Geghi Reservoir ............................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2. Geghanush Tailing Dam ................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 3. Description of the Breach Parameters ....................................................................................... 11 Figure 4. Data on TSF Failures Compiled by Data in Rico et al. (2008) and Chambers and Bowker (CB) (2017) (Entries in bold are not suitable for analysis) ....................................................................... 20 6 3 Figure
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • On the Status and Distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia Luscinia and Common Nightingale L
    Sandgrouse31-090402:Sandgrouse 4/2/2009 11:21 AM Page 18 On the status and distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and Common Nightingale L. megarhynchos in Armenia VASIL ANANIAN INTRODUCTION In the key references on the avifauna of the Western Palearctic and former Soviet Union, the breeding distributions of Common Luscinia megarhynchos and Thrush Nightingales L. luscinia in the Transcaucasus (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) are presented inconsistently, especially for the latter species. These sources disagree on the status of Thrush Nightingale in the area, thus Vaurie (1959), Cramp (1988) and Snow & Perrins (1998) considered it breeding in the Transcaucasus, while Dementiev & Gladkov (1954), Sibley & Monroe (1990) and Stepanyan (2003) do not. Its distribu- tion in del Hoyo et al (2005) is mapped according to the latter view, but they note the species’ presence in Armenia during the breeding season. Several other publications Plate 1. Common Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos performing full territorial song, Vorotan river gorge, c15 consider that the southern limit of Thrush km SSW of Goris town, Syunik province, Armenia, 12 May Nightingale’s Caucasian breeding range is 2005. © Vasil Ananian in the northern foothills of the Greater Caucasus mountains (Russian Federation), while the Transcaucasus is inhabited solely by Common Nightingale (Gladkov et al 1964, Flint et al 1967, Ivanov & Stegmann 1978, Vtorov & Drozdov 1980). Thrush Nightingale in Azerbaijan was classified as ‘accidental’ by Patrikeev (2004). The author accepted that the species had possibly nested in the past and referred to old summer records by GI Radde from the Karayasi forest in the Kura–Aras (Arax) lowlands, but Patrikeev found only Common Nightingale there in the late 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • ՀՀ ՍՅՈՒՆԻՔԻ ՄԱՐԶ RA SYUNIK MARZ Մարզկենտրոնը` Marz Centre Ք
    ՀՀ ՍՅՈՒՆԻՔԻ ՄԱՐԶ RA SYUNIK MARZ Մարզկենտրոնը` Marz centre ք. Կապան Kapan town Տարածաշրջանները` Territoires Կապան, Kapan, Գորիս, Goris, Սիսիան, Sisian, Մեղրի Meghri Քաղաքները` Towns Կապան, Kapan, ¶որիս, Goris, Սիսիան, Sisian, Մեղրի, Meghri, ք.Կապան Ագարակ, Agarak, s.Kapan Քաջարան, Qajaran, Դաստակերտ Dastakert ՀՀ Սյունիքի մարզը գտնվում է Հայաստանի Syunik marz is situated in the south of the Republic of Հանրապետության տարածքի հարավում: Armenia. Մարզը հյուսիսից սահմանակից է ՀՀ Վայոց ձորի In the North the marz borders with RA Vayots Dzor մարզին, հարավից պետական սահմանով սահմանակից marz, in the South it borders with Iran, (the length of border է Իրանին (սահմանի երկարությունը 42 կմ է), is 42 km), in the West - Nakhijevan and in the East - արևմուտքից` Նախիջևանին և արևելքից` Արցախին: Artsakh. Տարածքը 4506 քառ. կմ / Territory sq. km ՀՀ տարածքում մարզի տարածքի տեսակարար կշիռը 15.1% Territory share of the marz in the territory of RA Քաղաքային համայնքներ 7 Urban communities Գյուղական համայնքներ 102 Rural communities Քաղաքներ 7 Towns Գյուղեր 127 Villages Բնակչության թվաքանակը 2010թ. հունվարի 1-ի դրությամբ 152.9 հազ. մարդ / Population number as of January 1, 2010 ths. persons այդ թվում` including: քաղաքային 103.7 հազ. մարդ / urban ths. persons գյուղական 49.2 հազ. մարդ / rural ths. persons ՀՀ բնակչության ընդհանուր թվաքանակում մարզի բնակչության թվաքանակի տեսակարար կշիռը, 2009թ. 4.7% Share of marz population size in RA population size, 2009 Քաղաքային բնակչության թվաքանակի տեսակարար կշիռը 67.8% Share of urban population size Գյուղատնտեսական նշանակության հողեր 333598 հա / Agricultural land ha այդ թվում` վարելահողեր 43790 հա/ including: arable land ha Օգտակար հանածոներով հանրապետության It is the richest marz of the republic with useful minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • CMDR COE Proceedings 2020 5
    Chief Editor: Plamen Milanov Associate editors: Prof. Jordan Tabov, PhD (The Institute of Mathematics and Informatics – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) Assoc. Prof. Yuliana Karakaneva, PhD (New Bulgarian University) Assoc. Prof. Lyubka Pashova, (The Geodesy Department of the National Institute of Geophysics, Geodesy and Geography – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences) Assoc. Prof. Mihaela Kouteva-Guentcheva, PhD, Eng. (University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy) Irena Nikolova, PhD (Bulgarian Modeling and Simulation Association – BULSIM); Orlin Nikolov, PhD (Crisis Management and Disaster Response Centre of Excellence) Nikolay Tomov (Bulgarian Modeling and Simulation Association – BULSIM) Technical support: Hristina Hristova, Boris Guenov, Plamen Petrov Address: 34A Totleben Boulevard, 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria Phones: 359 29224700, 359 2 9224705 Fax: 359 2 9224755 w ww.cmdrcoe.org Dear Readers, Welcome to the 2020 CMDR COE Proceedings. The issue provides a retrospect into a year marked by a global pandemic, which has altered and continues to challenge security paradigms simultaneously in several aspects. The year of 2020 has introduced new requirements vis-à-vis the methods and means of the comprehensive approach. This publication also tries to look into the prospects for the year ahead while being fully cognizant of the challenges before us and standing well-prepared for calibrating our modus operandi. The year of 2020 has shown that engaging with the complexity of the security environment requires cooperation and interaction at various levels and by diverse stakeholders. COVID-19 has brought enormous suffering, has strained already limited capacities, at places beyond the point of a bounce-back, and yet – has also shown that we need to bring about a new smarter and more inclusive normal.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessement (EIA
    AWS CJSC Armenian Small Municipalities Water Project Engineering, Design and Contracts Supervision Proj. No. 610-1182 Detailed Design Environmental Impact Assessment REHABILITATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY NET- WORK IN KAPAN Armenian Small Municipalities Water Project DD - EIA - Kapan AWS CJSC Fichtner Water & Transportation GmbH / “Jrtuc” LLC Armenian Small Municipalities Water Project Engineering, Design and Contracts Supervision Detailed Design Environmental Impact Assessment KAPAN FWT/JRTUC - Project No. 610-1182 Issue and Revision Record No. Date Originator Checked Description A 28/06/2013 K. Hovhannisyan M. Uhlich - “Jrtuc” LLC Fichtner Water & Transportation GmbH Head Office: Project Office: Linnéstr. 5, 79110 Freiburg 8 Vardanants Blind Alley, 0010 Yerevan Federal Republic of Germany Republic of Armenia Phone: +49-761-88505-0 Phone: +374-10-562935 Fax: +49-761-88505-22 Fax: +374-10-562935 E-mail: [email protected] Contact: Michael Uhlich E-mail [email protected] “Jrtuc” LLC Republic of Armenia Gyukbenkyan str. 43/103, 0033 Yerevan Phone: +374-10-220148 Fax: +374-10-220148 Contact: Armen Avagyan E-mail: [email protected] 1182-KAP-EIA-ENG-130628-AA II Armenian Small Municipalities Water Project DD - EIA - Kapan AWS CJSC Fichtner Water & Transportation GmbH / “Jrtuc” LLC Structure of Detailed Design Volume I Detailed Design Report Volume II Detailed Design Drawings Volume III Environmental Management Plan Volume IV Detailed Design Cost Calculation (Confidential) 1182-KAP-EIA-ENG-130628-AA III Armenian Small Municipalities Water Project DD - EIA - Kapan AWS CJSC Fichtner Water & Transportation GmbH / “Jrtuc” LLC Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 2. THE MAIN CONCEPT AND OBJECTIVES OF THE DESIGN ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia
    The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia "Climate Change Impact Assessment" Project Yerevan 2009 The Socio-Economic Impact of Climate Change in Armenia Yerevan 2009 Authors: Elizabeth A. Stanton, Frank Ackerman, Flávia Resende, Stockholm Environment Institute – U.S. Center Tufts University, 11 Curtis Avenue Somerville, MA 02144, www.sei-us.org Reviewers: Anil Markandya, Basque Center for Climate Change, Seth Landau, Consultant Project Title: Climate Change Impact Assessment, UNDP/00049248 Implementing Agency: UNDP Armenia Implementing Partner: Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia UNDP Support: Keti Chachibaia, Regional Technical Advisor for Adaptation, Anna Kaplina, Programme Analyst, Bratislava UNDP Regional Centre for Europe and CIS Diana Harutyunyan, Climate Change Projects Manager, Vahagn Tonoyan, Task Leader, Climate Change Impact Assessment Project, UNDP Armenia Contributions: Cornelia Herzfeld, Ramón Bueno, and Adam Knoff at SEI-U.S, Mikhail Vermishev, Artem Kharazyan, Alvina Avagyan, Gagik Manucharyan, Anahit Hovsepyan, Hamlet Melkonyan, Levon Sahakyan, Ara Keshishyan, Armen Gevorgyan, Armen Nalbandyan, Benyamin Zakaryan, Boris Mnatsakanyan, Levon Chilingaryan, Georgi Fayvush, Lyonik Khachatryan, Rudik Nazaryan, Tigran Sadoyan and Hunan Ghazaryan, National Experts on Climate Change at UNDP Armenia Acknowledgement: This report, initiated by Mrs. Consuelo Vidal, Resident Representative of UNDP Armenia, is a product of cooperation and commitment of an extensive group of local and international consultants
    [Show full text]
  • Հավելված N 1 Հհ Կառավարության 2011 Թվականի Մարտի 3-Ի N 220 - Ն Որոշման
    Հավելված N 1 ՀՀ կառավարության 2011 թվականի մարտի 3-ի N 220 - Ն որոշման Կ Ա Ր Գ ՀԱՅԱՍՏԱՆԻ ՀԱՆՐԱՊԵՏՈՒԹՅԱՆ ԱՇԽԱՐՀԱԳՐԱԿԱՆ ԱՆՎԱՆՈՒՄՆԵՐԻ ՌՈՒՍԵՐԵՆ ԵՎ ԱՆԳԼԵՐԵՆ ՏԱՌԱԴԱՐՁՈՒԹՅԱՆ I. ԸՆԴՀԱՆՈՒՐ ԴՐՈՒՅԹՆԵՐ 1. Սույն կարգով կանոնակարգվում են այն հիմնական դրույթները, որոնք անհրա- ժեշտ են մեկ միասնական համակարգում Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումների անգլերեն և ռուսերեն հրատարակման և օգտագործման ժամանակ։ 2. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվի համար մշակվել է մեկ մասնակի կարգ, որը հիմնականում անհրաժեշտ կլինի Հայաստանի Հանրապետության աշխարհագրական անվանումներով ռուսերեն և անգլերեն քարտեզներ, ատլասներ, գրական և տեղեկատվական նյութեր հրատարակելիս, ինչպես նաև ճանապարհային, վարչական շենքերի և այլ նպատակների համար նախատեսված ցուցանակներ տեղադրելիս։ 3. Յուրաքանչյուր լեզվով անվանման ճիշտ ձևն ամրագրվում է` համադրելով մի քանի սկզբնաղբյուր։ 4. Հայերեն աշխարհագրական անվանումները պետք է տառադարձվեն այլ լեզուներով` հիմք ընդունելով տվյալ լեզվի արտահայտման առանձնահատկությունները, առավելագույնս մոտեցնելով դրանց գրելաձևերը հայերենի արտասանության հնչողությանը։ Առանձին դեպքերում ընդունված ավանդական գրելաձևերը հասցվել են նվազագույնի։ 5. Աշխարհագրական անվանումների տառադարձությունը, որպես կանոն, կատար- վում է հայերենի ժամանակակից գրելաձևից՝ հաստատված «Հայաստանի Հանրապետության վարչատարածքային բաժանման մասինե Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքով և տերմի- 11_0220 2 նաբանական կոմիտեի 1956 թվականի սեպտեմբերի, 1958 թվականի փետրվարի և 1978 թվականի փետրվարի համապատասխան որոշումներով։ Հայերենի այն հնչյունները, որոնք չունեն ռուսերեն և անգլերեն համարժեքներ, տառադարձվում են հնարավորինս ավելի մոտ
    [Show full text]
  • English Were Elaborated and Submitted on a Regular Basis to the World Bank Team
    Public Disclosure Authorized CONNECTING THE DOTS: TRANSPORT, POVERTY, AND SOCIAL Public Disclosure Authorized INCLUSION - EVIDENCE FROM ARMENIA December 2017 Transport and ICT Global Pracce EUROPE Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Connecting the Dots: Transport, Poverty, and Social Inclusion - Evidence from Armenia December 2017 Transport and ICT Global Practice EUROPE CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective November 1, 2017) Currency Unit = Armenian Dram (AMD) AMD 486,671 = US$1 US$ 0,00021 = AR$ 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Regional Vice President:Cyril Muller Country Director: Country Director:Mercy Miyang Tembon Senior Global Practice Director: Senior Global Practice Director:Jose Luis Irigoyen Practice Manager: Practice Manager:Juan Gaviria Task Team Leader(s): Task Team Leader(s):Steven Farji Weiss Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • THE STUDY on LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT in the REPUBLIC of ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., L
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT – 1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - February 2006 KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. THE STUDY ON LANDSLIDE DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FINAL REPORT VOLUME-V SECTORAL REPORT-1 - PRESENT CONDITIONS - Table of Contents Page CHAPTER 1 NATURAL CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Topography ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Geology ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Climate ................................................................................................................................ 6 CHAPTER-2 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM........................................................... 8 2.1 Legal System................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Policy, Budget, and Economy ...................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER-3 COMMUNITY STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 18 3.1 Purpose and Policy Of Study.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government of the Republic of Armenia
    E2203 Public Disclosure Authorized Government of the Republic of Armenia MCA-Armenia Team Proposal for Public Disclosure Authorized Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Impact Assessment of the Concept Paper Public Disclosure Authorized September 2005 Government of the Republic of Armenia Proposal for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance Environmental Impact Assessment CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................3 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL ..........................................................4 2.1. Proposed Investment Areas.......................................................................4 2.2. Current Situation of Irrigation Infrastructure and Proposed Investments...4 2.3. Current Situation of Rural Roads and Proposed Investments.................36 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN ARMENIA...................50 3.1. Legal Framework......................................................................................50 3.2. International Agreements .........................................................................53 3.3. Institutional Framework ............................................................................57 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS....................................................................60 4.1. “No Action” Alternative .............................................................................61 4.2. Potential Positive Impacts ........................................................................62
    [Show full text]