Harvard International Review What is Nuclear Superiority? Author(s): Robert Bathurst, Albert Carnesale, Richard Garwin, Stanley Hoffmann, Steve Miller, Joseph Nye, Richard Pipes, Bruce Porter, Scott Thompson and Adam Ulam Source: Harvard International Review, Vol. 3, No. 1 (SEPTEMBER 1980), p. 1, 14 Published by: Harvard International Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42762057 Accessed: 30-12-2015 22:00 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Harvard International Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Harvard International Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Wed, 30 Dec 2015 22:00:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions HARVARD INTERNATIONAL REVIEWm Ě mm w W m mam W W September i980, volume 3, number i recentmonths, we haveseen Secretary of Defense interestswere challenged with conventional forces by the Harold Brown warn that our land-basedInter- Soviet Union on a numberof occasions, and those continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) are challengescontinued during the entireperiod of Soviet vulnerable to Soviet attack, the ratification inferiority. In of the second Strategic Arms Limitation Apparently,there is a dimensionof nuclearsuperiority Treaty(SALT) languishin the Senate,President Jimmy whichdoes notháve to do withnumbers or throwweight; Carter'sDirective 59 emphasizecounterforce targeting, ithas to do withmen's minds.