DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Gretchen Ritter [email protected] Office of Executive Vice President

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Gretchen Ritter Ritterg@Utexas.Edu Office of Executive Vice President Gretchen Ritter [email protected] Office of Executive Vice President and Provost University of Texas at Austin Main Building 201 1 University Station G1000 Austin, TX 78712 (512) 232-3312 office (512) 475-7385 fax EDUCATION: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Political Science, Doctorate of Philosophy Cornell University, Department of Government, Bachelor of Sciences, Distinction in All Subjects ACADEMIC POSITIONS: Professor, Government Department, University of Texas at Austin, 2007 - present. Associate Professor, University of Texas at Austin, 1998-2007 Fellow of Law and Government, Harvard Law School, 2000-2001 Visiting Associate Professor, Government Dept., Harvard University, Fall 2000 Assistant Professor, Government Department, University of Texas at Austin, 1992-8 Visiting Faculty Fellow, Center for Domestic and Comparative Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 1994-5 ADMINISTRATIVE POSITIONS: Vice Provost of Undergraduate Education and Faculty Governance, University of Texas at Austin, 2009 - present. The portfolio for this position includes: undergraduate curriculum review and program approval, review of all faculty legislation, oversight for academic advising, liaison to the School of Undergraduate Studies, liaison to the Senate of College Councils, administration and selection of campus wide teaching awards, and oversight for university standing committees. In this position, Ritter convenes the Provost’s Council on Academic Advising, chairs the Committee on Undergraduate Program Review (which is responsible for undergraduate curriculum changes), and serves on the expanded Faculty Council Executive Committee 1 (FCEC+). In 2009-10, she oversaw the reorganization of the Center for Teaching and Learning. After undertaking a review of our campus side academic support programs, in 2010 Ritter created the Council of Academic Support Programs to increase coordination and share best practices for programs that seek to improve retention and support academic success, particularly for students from under represented populations. Ritter’s largest new initiative in the provost’s office has been the creation of the Course Transformation Program (CTP), founded in 2011. The CTP is an effort to redesign the large lower division gateway courses – using insights from cognitive psychology and opportunities created by educational technologies to strengthen pathways to success and promote deeper learning in these key foundational classes. Director, Center for Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Texas at Austin, 2004-2009. The Center for Women’s and Gender Studies (CWGS) is both a research and teaching program that offers degrees, promotes interdisciplinary research, hosts public lectures and conferences, and engages in outreach work in support of organizations that help women and girls in the community. Under Ritter, CWGS was the largest interdisciplinary program at UT Austin with over 250 faculty affiliates. During her tenure as director, Ritter created the CWGS Faculty Development Program, to provide mentoring and professional development to new faculty affiliates; oversaw the creation of an undergraduate major in women’s and gender studies; and established a Community Advisory Board for fundraising and community outreach purposes. PUBLICATIONS AND OTHER WORKS: Books: The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order, (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006). Goldbugs and Greenbacks: The Antimonopoly Tradition and the Politics of Finance in America, 1865-1896, (NY: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Reprinted in paperback 1999. Democratization in America: A Comparative and Historical Perspective, edited by Desmond King, Robert Lieberman, Gretchen Ritter and Laurence Whitehead, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009). Book Chapters: “Women’s Civic Inclusion and the Bill of Rights,” in Linda McClain and Joanna Grossman, eds., Gender Equality: Dimensions of Women’s Equal Citizenship, (NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 60-82. “Gender and Democracy in the American Constitutional Order,” in King, Lieberman, Ritter and Whitehead, eds., Democratization in America, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), pp. 107-132. 2 “American Political Development and Comparative Democratization,” co-authored with Laurence Whitehead and Desmond King, in King, Lieberman, Ritter and Whitehead, eds., Democratization in America, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), pp. 247-275. “Gender as a Category of Analysis in American Political Development,” in Political Women and American Democracy, Christina Wolbrecht, Karen Beckwith and Lisa Valdez, eds. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 12-30. Articles in Refereed Journals: “Education and Community Engagement: Rethinking the Role of Faculty at a Research University,” On the Horizon, forthcoming. “Women’s Citizenship and the Problem of Legal Personhood in the United States in the 1960s and 1970s,” Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 13 (Fall 2003). “Jury Service and Women’s Citizenship Before and After the Nineteenth Amendment” Law and History Review, v. 20, n. 3, (Fall 2002): 479-515. “Of War and Virtue: Gender, American Citizenship and Veterans’ Benefits After World War II,” The Comparative Study of Conscription: Comparative Social Research, Lars Mjoset and Stephen Van Holde, editors, vol. 20, 2002: 201-226. “The State of Gender Studies in Political Science,” with Nicole Mellow, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571, (September 2000): 121-35. “Gender and Citizenship after the Nineteenth Amendment,” Polity, 32, (Spring 2000): 345-75. "Silver Slippers and a Golden Cap: L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and Historical Memory in American Politics," Journal of American Studies, vol. 31, no. 2 (1997): 171-202. "Gender and the Origins of Modern Social Policies in Britain and the United States," with Theda Skocpol, in Studies in American Political Development, 5 (Spring 1991): 36-93. Reprinted in Theda Skocpol, Social Policy in the United States: Future Possibilities in Historical Perspective, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995) Also reprinted in Britain and America: Studies in Comparative History, 1790-1970, David Englander, ed., (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996) Essays and Published Proceedings: “Domestic Containment or Equal Standing? Gender, Nationalism, and the War on Terror,” in “Women’s History as Policy History: The Work of Jane Sherron De Hart,” Forum essays, Journal of Policy History 21.4 (Fall 2009). “Gender and Politics Over Time,” Politics & Gender 3(1): 387-397, (September 2007). “Is Subversion Subversive? On the Subject of Feminism,” Proceedings from a roundtable discussion with Kathryn Abrams (Boalt Law School), Katherine Franke (Columbia Law School), 3 David Kennedy (Harvard Law School) and Zipporah Wiseman (Texas Law School) presented at Subversive Legacies: Learning from the Past/Constructing the Future, conference held at UT Law School, November 22&23, 2002, published in Texas Journal of Women and the Law, 13 (Fall 2003). “Gender and American Political Development” Proceedings from a roundtable discussion with Gretchen Ritter, Carole Pateman, Eileen McDonagh, and Wendy Sarvasy, Clio, vol. 9, no. 1 (Fall/Winter 1998-1999). Book Review Essays: “Manliness, by Harvey Mansfield,” book review in Men and Masculinities, 10 (August 2008): 640-643. “Joel Handler, Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe,” book review in Law and Politics Book Review, 2005. “Kira Sanbonmatsu, Democrats, Republicans and the Politics of Women’s Place,” book review, American Political Science Review, 97 (2003). “Susan Marshall, Splintered Sisterhood: Gender and Class in the Campaign against Woman Suffrage,” book review, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 113, no. 2 (Summer 1998): 333-4. “Charles Noble, Welfare as We Knew It: A Political History of the American Welfare State,” book review, American Political Science Review, vol. 92, no. 3 (Sept. 1998): 710-11. “Modernity, Subjectivity and the Law: Reflections on Marianne Constable’s The Law of the Other,” Law & Social Inquiry. vol. 22, no. 3 (Summer 1997): 809 - 828. "Seth Koven and Sonya Michel, eds., Mothers of a New World," book review, American Political Science Review, 88, 3 (September 1994): ): 782-3. "Clarence Wunderlin, Jr. Visions of a New Industrial Order," book review, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99, no. 4 (January 1994): 1109-10. Reports and Other Works: Gender Equity Task Force Final Report, J Strother Moore and Gretchen Ritter, lead authors, report to Provost Steven Leslie, University of Texas at Austin, November 2008. “FEMCIT: International Advisory Group’s General Comments after the Leiden Meeting,” Keiko Funabashi, Jeff Hearn, Myra Marx Ferree, Gretchen Ritter, and C. Sarah Soh, project assessment for European Union Research Framework Programme, April 2008. “Women in Academic Science and Engineering,” Statement prepared for a hearing before the Subcommittee on Research and Science Education, House Committee on Science and Technology, United States Congress, October 17, 2007. Essay and Bibliography for “Constitution Day” on the UTOPIA website, September 2005, http://utopia.utexas.edu/project/constitution/reading.html 4 Interview with Michael Rogin about his Life and Work, Audio Archives Project of the Politics & History Section of the American Political Science Association, 1996. "Multiculturalism as It Really
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Liberal Tradition and the Law: Half a Century After Hartz
    What Hartz Didn’t Understand about the “Liberal Tradition” Then, and Why It Matters for Understanding Law Now1 Carol Nackenoff Department of Political Science Swarthmore College [email protected] For Presentation at the University of Maryland Law School/Georgetown Law Center Schmooze, March 3-4, 2006 To what extent, and in what sense, is it meaningful to talk about the liberal tradition as a context within which constitutional deliberation takes place in the United States? There certainly are very real constraints on what most of those who don black robes and speak the language of constitutional law seem to be able to think. Justice Robert Jackson wrote that “never in its entire history can the Supreme Court be said to have for a single hour been representative of anything except the relatively conservative forces of its day."2 The Constitution establishes much tighter boundary conditions for deliberation for some legal scholars and jurists than for others, and arguments abound about whether the principles and values expressed in that document are fixed or available to later generations to interpret for themselves. That legal discourse has been relatively constrained remains clear.3 It is also reasonably clear that the 2004 election assured that 1 Portions of this paper have just been published as “Locke, Alger, and Atomistic Individualism Fifty Years Later: Revisiting Louis Hartz’s Liberal Tradition in America,” Studies in American Political Development 19 (Fall 2005): 206-215. Thanks to Aaron Strong and Ian Sulam for research assistance. 2 Robert H. Jackson, The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy (New York: A. A.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Us Government and Politics: American Political Development
    POL 433/USA 403: TOPICS IN U.S. GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO WINTER 2019 Dr. Connor Ewing [email protected] Schedule: Monday 10:00am-12:00pm Location: OI 7192 Office Hours: Mon. & Tues. 12:00-2:00 pm, Larkin 215 Course Description This course explores the substance, nature, and study of American political development. It will begin by examining the methodology, mechanisms, and patterns of American political development from the founding to the present. Emphasis will be placed on divergent perspectives on the nature of political development, particularly narratives of continuity and discontinuity. Taking an institution-based approach, the course will then examine the central institutions of American politics and how they have developed over the course of American political history. Relevant to these institutional developments are a host of topics that students will have the opportunity to explore further in various written assignments. This include, but are not limited to, the following: the Constitution and the founding; political economy, trade, and industrialization; bureaucracy and administration; citizenship and inclusion; race and civil rights; law and legal development; and political parties. Course Objectives This course is intended to: • provide students with an understanding of key themes in and approaches to American political development; • expose students to multiple methods of political analysis, with an emphasis on the relationship and tensions between qualitative and quantitative methods; and • develop written and oral communication skills through regular classroom discussions and a range of writing assignments. Course Texts • The Search for American Political Development, Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek (Yale University Press, 2004) • The Legacies of Losing, Nicole Mellow and Jeffrey Tulis (University of Chicago Press, 2018) All other readings will be available on the course website.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 American Political Development Spring 2012, W 7:00-9:30Pm, PAC
    American Political Development Spring 2012, W 7:00-9:30pm, PAC 422 Instructor: Elvin Lim Office: PAC 308 Phone: 860.685.3459 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: M 4:15-6:00PM and by appointment Course Description This course introduces students to a scholarship and a method of analysis that melds the historical with the institutional, applied to understanding the evolving state/society relationship in American political life. We examine developmental junctures in US history; critical-theoretical themes that cut across studies in political development; and then we will unpack the meaning and assumptions behind development itself. Logistics You should purchase the following books from a bookstore of your choice: Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek, The Search for American Political Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004). Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1991). Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Transformations (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1998). You can access all other readings listed below at this course’s Moodle page inside the Readings folder via https://moodle.wesleyan.edu/login/index.php. The best way to contact me is via email at [email protected]. For help on writing, you may want to consult http://www.wesleyan.edu/writing/workshop. Students with documented disabilities must request from Dean Sarah Lazare a letter outlining the accommodations to which you are entitled. Information on disabilities services is available at http://www.wesleyan.edu/deans/disabilities.html. Requirements Class Participation (15%) Your participation should be rooted in class readings and directed to the topic being discussed. Mid-Term Paper (35%) This is an eight-paged (double-spaced) paper due in class on 4/11.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Jeung Oregon 0171A 12691.Pdf
    LABOR MARKET POLICY AMERICAN STYLE: STATE CAPACITY AND POLICY INNOVATION, 1959-1968 by YONGWOO JEUNG A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy March 2020 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Yongwoo Jeung Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Gerald Berk Chairperson Craig Parsons Core Member Joseph Lowndes Core Member Daniel Pope Institutional Representative and Kate Mondloch Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded March 2020. ii © 2020 Yongwoo Jeung This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (United States) License. iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Yongwoo Jeung Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science March 2020 Title: Labor Market Policy American Style: State Capacity and Policy Innovation, 1959- 1968 This dissertation delves into the American state’s capabilities by examining its experiments with corporatism and labor training during the 1960s. The dissertation relies on the frameworks of layering, patchwork, intercurrence, and entrepreneurship from various disciplines including comparative historical analysis, historical institutionalism, American Political Development, and the school of political creativity. The dissertation first challenges the mainstream view that regards as impossible any tripartite bargaining among U.S. labor, management, and the state. The United States experimented with the unique tripartite committee—the President’s Committee on Labor- Management Policy—in the early 1960s to address emerging problems such as automation and intractable industrial conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Department of Political Science
    A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Los ANGELES 1920,1987 Winston W Crouch, .Professor Emeritus The Department of Political Science, Los Angeles, June 1987 ., A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Los ANGELES Winston W. Crouch, Professor Emeritus ··1 :, The Department of Political Science, Los Angeles, June 1987 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several persons contributed to the preparation of this departmental history. In i addition to Chairman Richard Sisson, Professors Richard Baum, Robert Fried, Douglas Hobbs, Andrzej Korbonski, Charles Nixon, and Ronald Rogowski gave very helpful counsel and suggestions at various stages of the project. Professor Emeritus J.A.C. Grant provided information regarding some of the earlier years. Clare Walker's (Departmental Management Services Officer) knowledge of de­ partmental personnel and its records was invaluable. Becky Carrera (Administra­ tive Assistant) was similarly helpful. Moreover, she put the manuscript on the computer. Barbara Jess (Graduate Counselor) provided the information about the Ph.D. graduates. Vicki Waldman (Undergraduate Counselor) helped with some points about the undergraduates, and James Bondurant (Curriculum Coordinator) supplied enrollment figures. Daniel Rodriguez, an undergraduate research assistant, combed the Law Library references for departmental graduates who serve in the state and federal judiciaries. Dorothy Wells, of the Public Affairs Section of the University Research Library, also provided bibliographic assistance frequently. All their efforts are greatly appreciated. w.w.c. I. I TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword (Richard Sisson) . iii : . lI' History Narrative The Southern Branch Period, 1920-192 7 . 2 Development of a University Department, 1928-1940 ............... 7 World War II, 1940-1946 .
    [Show full text]
  • SAP Volume 7 Issue 1 Cover and Front Matter
    STUDIES IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT VOLUME 7 - ' NUMBER 1 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.40.40, on 26 Sep 2021 at 21:20:56, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X00000651 STUDIES IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT Editors Karen Orren, Political Science, University Stephen Skowronek, Political Science, of California Los Angeles Yale University Editorial Advisory Board Joyce Appleby, History, University of Terry M. Moe, Political Science, Stanford California, Los Angeles University Walter Dean Burnham, Government, Elizabeth Sanders, Political Science, New University of Texas School for Social Research Eldon Eisenach, Political Science, Martin Shapiro, Law and Political University of Tulsa Science, University of California, Berkeley Samuel Kernell, Political Science, University of California, San Diego Martin Shefter, Government, Cornell University Stephen D. Krasner, Political Science, Stanford University Theda Skocpol, Sociology, Harvard University Theodore J. Lowi, Government, Cornell University Cass R. Sunstein, Law and Political Science, University of Chicago Richard L. McCormick, History, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Rogers M. Smith, Political Science, Yale University Terrence J. McDonald, History, University of Michigan Studies in American Political Development is a semi-annual periodical which publishes theoretical and empirical research on political development and institutional change in the United States. A diversity of subject matters and methodologies is invited, including comparative or international studies that jlluminate the American case. Manuscripts of up to 75 pages in length, exclud- ing footnotes, will be considered. There is a "Notes" section for shorter presen- tation of research perspectives and findings.
    [Show full text]
  • PSC 5330 American Political Development
    Baylor University Political Science 5330 American Political Development Professor David Nichols Course Goals and Objectives: This course will provide an introduction to field of American Political Development which has emerged as an important field of study in American politics over the last ten to fifteen years. Its focus is the growth and development of American political institutions over time and the extent to which political institutions shape one another and political history. Through an examination of the interaction of variables such as political thought, social and economic interests, political actors, and institutional structures and ways in which these variables shape political outcomes, the course will seek to identify patterns of political development, an provide a complex understanding of the causes of political change in American politics. The principal objectives of the course are to: 1. familiarize students with the theoretical assumptions underlying the field of American political development 2. encourage students to consider different approaches to the study of political change 3. provide students with a historical context in which to understand contemporary political institutions 4. develop the skills necessary to undertake a research project in this field Required Texts: James W. Ceaser. Presidential Selection: Theory and Development (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979). David R. Mayhew. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an American Genre (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002) Michael Nelson. The Evolving Presidency: Addresses, Cases, Essays, Letters, Reports, Resolutions, Transcripts, and Other Landmark Documents, 1787-2004, 2nd edition (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2004) Sidney M. Milkis, The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System Since the New Deal (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993) Stephen Skowronek.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Mcthomas, Ph.D
    Mary McThomas, Ph.D. Department of Political Science and Public Administration Mississippi State University 105 Bowen Hall ● Mail Stop 9561 Mississippi State, MS 39762 662-325-7864 (office) / 662-325-2716 (fax) [email protected] EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California at Los Angeles Department of Political Science, August 2007 Major Fields: Political Theory and American Politics Dissertation: The Right to Privacy: Individual Liberty, Property Interests and the Dual System of Privacy Rights in the United States Committee: Carole Pateman (co-chair), Andrew Sabl (co-chair), Karen Orren, Lynn Vavreck, and Clyde Spillenger (Law School) Research Interests: Immigration, Gender & Politics, Individual Rights in a Pluralistic Society, Law & Social Norms, and American Political Thought Master of Arts in Political Science University of California at Los Angeles Department of Political Science, April 2002 Bachelor of Arts in Politics University of California at Santa Cruz Department of Political Science, June 1992 Graduated with College Honors Minor: Literature PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science Brown University, August 2011-July 2012 Political Theory Project Assistant Professor Mississippi State University, August 2008 – Present Department of Political Science and Public Administration Courses Taught: PhD Level: Normative Political Analysis Masters and Undergraduate Level: Western Political Theory; American Political Theory; Women, Politics and the Law;
    [Show full text]
  • POL433:USA403 Syllabus
    POL433/USA403: TOPICS IN U.S. GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS: AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO WINTER 2020 Dr. Connor Ewing [email protected] Schedule: Monday 10:00am-12:00pm Location: BL 113 Office Hours: Mon. & Tues. 12:00-2:00 pm, Larkin 215 Course Description This course explores the substance, nature, and study of American political development. It will begin by examining the methodology, mechanisms, and patterns of American political development from the founding to the present. Emphasis will be placed on divergent perspectives on the nature of political development, particularly narratives of continuity and discontinuity. Taking an institution-based approach, the course will then examine the central institutions of American politics and how they have developed over the course of American political history. Relevant to these institutional developments are a host of topics that students will have the opportunity to explore further in various written assignments. This include, but are not limited to, the following: the Constitution and the founding; political economy, trade, and industrialization; bureaucracy and administration; citizenship and inclusion; race and civil rights; law and legal development; and political parties. Course Objectives This course is intended to: • provide students with an understanding of key themes in and approaches to American political development; • expose students to multiple methods of political analysis, with an emphasis on the relationship and tensions between qualitative and quantitative methods; and • develop written and oral communication skills through regular classroom discussions and a range of writing assignments. Course Texts • The Search for American Political Development, Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek (Yale University Press, 2004) • The Legacies of Losing, Nicole Mellow and Jeffrey Tulis (University of Chicago Press, 2018) All other readings will be available on the course website.
    [Show full text]
  • Eason CV Winter 2018
    Mackenzie Hamilton Eason Curriculum Vitae Department of Political Science Mobile: 970-618-2452 University of California, Los Angeles Email: [email protected] Box 951472, 4289 Bunche Hall Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472 EDUCATION University of California, Los Angeles (entered Fall 2013) Ph.D. in Political Science, expected Fall 2018. Major Fields: Political Theory and International Relations. Secondary field: Formal Theory and Quantitative Methods. Qualifying paper passed with distinction, April 2015. University of California, Los Angeles J.D., 2012, Law. Specializations: Law and Philosophy, Critical Race Studies. University of Colorado, Boulder M.A., Comparative Literature, 2009. University of Colorado, Boulder B.A. Philosophy and Humanities, 2007. Summa Cum Laude in Philosophy. Magna Cum Laude in Humanities. Graduated with distinction (Dean’s list all semesters). Elected Phi Beta Kappa. FELLOWSHIPS, HONORS, AND AWARDS Graduate Research Mentorship, UCLA Graduate Division, 2016-2017. Graduate Summer Research Mentorship, UCLA Graduate Division, Summer 2016. Best Paper Award, UCLA International Institute Third Annual Conference, Los Angeles, California, April 25, 2016. Tuition Scholarship, Cornell School of Criticism and Theory, Summer 2016 (declined). Rapoport Fellowship, UCLA Department of Political Science, 2016. Departmental Fellowship, UCLA Department of Political Science, Summer 2015. Graduate Summer Research Mentorship, UCLA Graduate Division, 2014. Mackenzie Eason CV Page 1! of 5! October 2016 Departmental Fellowship, UCLA Department of Political Science Fellowship, 2013-2014. University Fellowship, UCLA School of Law, 2009, 2010, 2012. Phi Beta Kappa Crisp Fellowship, PBK Alpha Chapter, CU Boulder, 2007. Kirkland B. Greer Memorial Scholarship, CU Boulder, 2005, 2006. PRESENTATIONS/PAPERS PRESENTED “Legacies of Empire in International Law: Strategy and Criminality in the Long 19th Century,” American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, August 30 – September 2, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • An Experiment in Unifying Theories of American Political
    THE ENLIGHTENMENT IN PRAXIS: AN EXPERIMENT IN UNIFYING THEORIES OF AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jacob William Johnson, B.A., M.A. __________________________ Michael Zuckert, Director Graduate Program in Political Science Notre Dame, Indiana March 2008 THE ENLIGHTENMENT IN PRAXIS: AN EXPERIMENT IN UNIFYING THEORIES OF AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT Abstract by Jacob William Johnson There is a problem in the way the study of American political development (APD) is currently bifurcated between the “cultural” approach and the “institutional” approach. The cultural approach tries to explain change in terms of historical forces such as race, economics, liberalism, the founding, and so on. The institutional approach, on the other hand, tries to explain change logically, in terms of the history of the operational procedures of institutions such as political parties. The trouble is that these two approaches cannot integrate each other’s findings, and they maintain -- internally -- differing and opposing schools of thought about what exactly drives the evolution of America’s politics. My way of making sense out of this chaos is very straightforward: I Jacob William Johnson argue that at the root of all of America’s political development is a radical philosophical movement called the Enlightenment. In chapters one and two I show how there are four specific types of early Enlightenment thinking at work in America’s founding. I argue that these “types” are exemplified by the ideas of Francis Bacon, Charles Montesquieu, Thomas Hobbes, and Jean-Jacque Rousseau.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Federal Government and Slavery: Following the Money Trail
    The Federal Government and Slavery: Following the Money Trail David F. Ericson This study contributes to two bodies of literature. First, it amends the recent literature on the development of the American state.1 Second, it amends the recent literature on the impact of slavery on American public policy. In fact, this study uniquely brings together those two bodies of literature by showing how slavery contributed to the development of the American state. While the first body of literature largely ignores how slavery affected the development of the American state, the second traces the proslavery biases of federal policies without discussing how those policies positively affected the development of the American state. The assumption common to both bodies of literature is that to the extent slavery affected the development of the American state it negatively affected that development.2 This study corrects that assumption. Stephen Skowronek’s analysis of the development of the administrative capacity of the American state during the Progressive era has powerfully influenced the field of American political development. Skowronek argued that the Progressive era was the “critical juncture” when an early American state of “courts and parties” was transformed into a more modern bureaucratic state. Though at times he characterized the early American state as relatively weak and stateless compared to the twentieth-century American state, he ultimately concluded that they were two different kinds of states.3 For the most part, Richard Bensel agreed with Skowronek’s assessment of the early American state.4 But unlike Skowronek, Bensel analyzed the massive state-building programs that were launched during the Civil War, in both the North and the South.
    [Show full text]