A Consortium at Hungary's Papa Air Base Greatly Expands Airlift

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Consortium at Hungary's Papa Air Base Greatly Expands Airlift C-17s inBy John A. Tirpak, Hungary Executive Editor A consortium at Hungary’s Papa Air Base greatly expands airlift capability for a group of European allies. But where does it go from here? n experiment in military airlift, playing out at a former Capability (SAC), is unique. The consortium comprises 10 NATO Warsaw Pact base in central Hungary, is being watched members and two other countries. with great interest by many members of NATO. Though it has a military hierarchy, it is not under NATO com- ATwelve nations have come together to jointly own and operate mand, nor is it an entity of the European Union or the United a trio of C-17 heavy cargo aircraft, sharing flying hours and costs Nations. The SAC is controlled by a steering committee (chaired according to their various needs. If the experiment succeeds, it by a US Air Force general officer, currently Maj. Gen. Mark O. could be a model for how NATO members, pressed by withering Schissler) that allocates flying time based on participant requests defense budgets, can buy military capabilities they must have, and contributions. Its operational organization, called the Heavy at a price they can bear. Airlift Wing (HAW), has been led by USAF officers, currently So far—and to the surprise of many—the experiment seems Col. Keith P. Boone. His successor is scheduled to be a Dutch to be a success. The arrangement, called the Strategic Airlift Air Force officer. 38 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2011 Staff photo by JohnTirpak A. USAF photo by TabithaSrA. M. Lee A C-17 on the ramp at Papa AB, Hungary. Top: A HAW C-17 approaches the boom of a 100th Air Refuel- ing Wing KC-135 during a training mission over Germany. Here: TSgt. Joseph Johns, a USAF crew chief deployed to Papa, talks with a SAC C-17 flight crew on an airfield in Lithuania. Many HAW missions fly with no USAF crew aboard. USAF photo by TSgt. Wayne Clark AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2011 39 of the cost. Hungary offered Papa—an underused base fairly central to member countries in Eastern Europe—as the unit headquarters and operating location. Most participants provide aircrews; some of the less affluent countries provide security Staff photos by JohnTirpak A. forces and other personnel for the base. The three C-17s bear the markings of Hungary and the minimalist identifier “SAC.” Since going operational, the HAW has routinely moved personnel and supplies from Europe to NATO bases in Afghani- stan, but has also taken relief supplies to Pakistani flood victims and flown to Haiti in the aftermath of the powerful “I suspect there were a lot of skeptics” that the consortium approach would work, said Schissler, head of plans and policy for US European Command. Speaking during the HAW’s first change-of-command ceremony in June at Papa AB, Hungary, where SAC is headquartered, Schissler—the chair of the SAC steering committee—ran down a list of the HAW’s achievements. He noted that the wing went from concept to the start of base operations “in just two-and- a-half years” and has since amassed more Facilities at Papa range from Cold War-era derelicts (top) to a recently updated than 4,500 flying hours without a safety control tower (above), maintenance hangar, and administrative building. mishap. “Way too many” of those hours were in combat situations in Afghanistan, the aircraft on its own was a serious 2010 earthquake. The ability of countries Schissler said. financial challenge for Sweden. such as Hungary to make a gesture like This achievement is recognized as Other nations facing a similar require- that to Haiti or Pakistan is a source of “truly amazing” by diplomats and military ment wondered whether a group buy was great national pride, said HAW officials. professionals who thought the details of feasible. NATO looked at an Alliance The HAW is “a great arrangement for running a military entity by international purchase of heavy lift aircraft, taking as every country that belongs to it,” Schissler committee—each member having its own precedent its common acquisition, man- observed, “because we gain something foreign policy and security objectives— ning, and operation of the E-3 AWACS. that none of us have enough of, which would be impossibly complicated, he However, because Sweden—and later is strategic airlift.” added. “It’s only been five years” since Finland—were likely participants but not For the smaller countries, he said, “it the concept was first broached, Schissler NATO members, the arrangement moved brings them access to a whole group of said. He paid tribute to the members for outside the Alliance. nations on a regular basis.” There is also their commitment to make the concept “some prestige being associated with this work in spite of “the political upheaval of Cultural, Language Barriers multinational effort. … It’s absolutely the last few years,” chalking it up to each There was some urgency to do a deal. historic. You can’t find another unit that country contributing “some very talented Boeing had announced that, without fur- stood up and flew combat a month after people” to the enterprise. ther orders from the Air Force or foreign getting their first airplane. It just doesn’t The SAC consortium was conceived in buyers, it would begin shutting down happen.” 2006, when a number of NATO nations the C-17 production line. It was the last The US provides the consortium with identified a need for long-range, outsize chance to “get in on” the C-17 before crew training at its C-17 schoolhouse— cargo capacity beyond the performance the line closed. Altus AFB, Okla.—through the Foreign of tactical airlifters, such as the C-130. Eventually, a deal was struck. The char- Military Sales program. Because the Sweden, a neutral nation belonging ter members in the SAC were the NATO C-17 is an American aircraft and crews to the EU but not NATO, was deep in members Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, are schooled at an American base, initial negotiations to buy C-17s from Boeing. Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Po- regulations and procedures were grafted It needed a capability to move people land, Romania, Slovenia, and the United from USAF wholesale. That is gradually and large equipment directly to forward States, plus non-NATO Partnership for changing, said Lt. Col. Christian Lang- locations half a world away to meet its Peace countries Sweden and Finland. feldt, the HAW’s director of operations. UN peacekeeping commitments. How- The US contributed one of three C- Langfeldt, of the Norwegian Air Force, ever, the cost of buying and supporting 17s, a third of the personnel, and a third said the principal challenges facing the 40 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2011 unit are “the culture [and] the language can he order anyone to support a mission for the HAW’s C-17s. About 50 Boeing barrier. We have to translate everything that person’s country has not approved. personnel work at the base and perform two times.” The steering committee meets four nearly all of the aircraft maintenance, There are other cultural hurdles. Nor- times a year for a heavy series of meet- although HAW personnel serve as crew way’s air force, for example, has no enlisted ings to plan the use of the aircraft, which chiefs. Several other buildings have been personnel, only officers. Some countries’ are budgeted for 3,165 hours a year, or renovated for living, dining, and office personnel are forbidden to work more than roughly 1,000 hours per airplane, although support functions. 40 hours a week, and there are different the actual hours flown in 2010 was about HAW personnel privately acknowledge rules regarding crew days and crew rest 2,800 hours across the fleet. It tries to plan Papa’s main shortcoming is the lack of a periods, for example. “The regulations the use of the aircraft as far ahead as pos- hangar that can enclose an entire C-17. The are different for all the varying countries,” sible, but some wiggle room is built in to wind and cold of the Hungarian cornfields Langfeldt said. “You have to understand accommodate pop-up requirements. In the surrounding Papa can make maintenance [that] things are different, [and] how you event of a conflict that can’t be resolved, on the big airplanes a trial in winter. receive words is important.” the nations have agreed to let the HAW “Think Minot,” one USAF member of USAF regulations are gradually being commander make the final call. the HAW said, referring to the Air Force shifted to account for the HAW’s unique So far, he has not had to serve as tie- base in North Dakota. “Imagine Minot in mix of people and national styles. “We’re breaker. winter without a hangar to work in.” The making it our own,” he said. “We try to issue has the attention of the steering com- show the Americans that it is possible to Papa’s Shortcomings mittee, and is stimulating a debate about do it in different ways.” A rail line runs adjacent to the base, and whether to stay at Papa, due to a financial Langfeldt said the various participants much heavy gear can be brought to the windfall coming to the SAC. have sent quality people to the unit. They airplanes for transport, although one senior The HAW’s three aircraft were bought in want to “put their best foot forward,” he officer described the condition of the rail a hurry because Boeing was getting ready to said.
Recommended publications
  • Realignment and Indian Air Power Doctrine
    Realignment and Indian Airpower Doctrine Challenges in an Evolving Strategic Context Dr. Christina Goulter Prof. Harsh Pant Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs requests a courtesy line. ith a shift in the balance of power in the Far East, as well as multiple chal- Wlenges in the wider international security environment, several nations in the Indo-Pacific region have undergone significant changes in their defense pos- tures. This is particularly the case with India, which has gone from a regional, largely Pakistan-focused, perspective to one involving global influence and power projection. This has presented ramifications for all the Indian armed services, but especially the Indian Air Force (IAF). Over the last decade, the IAF has been trans- forming itself from a principally army-support instrument to a broad spectrum air force, and this prompted a radical revision of Indian aipower doctrine in 2012. It is akin to Western airpower thought, but much of the latest doctrine is indigenous and demonstrates some unique conceptual work, not least in the way maritime air- power is used to protect Indian territories in the Indian Ocean and safeguard sea lines of communication. Because of this, it is starting to have traction in Anglo- American defense circles.1 The current Indian emphases on strategic reach and con- ventional deterrence have been prompted by other events as well, not least the 1999 Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, which demonstrated that India lacked a balanced defense apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East
    U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East Fact Sheet - Matthew Wallin i June 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable Gary Hart, Chairman Emeritus Admiral William Fallon, USN (Ret.) Senator Hart served the State of Colorado in the U.S. Senate Admiral Fallon has led U.S. and Allied forces and played a and was a member of the Committee on Armed Services leadership role in military and diplomatic matters at the highest during his tenure. levels of the U.S. government. Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Chairperson Raj Fernando Christine Todd Whitman is the President of the Whitman Strategy Group, a consulting firm that specializes in energy Raj Fernando is CEO and founder of Chopper Trading, a and environmental issues. technology based trading firm headquartered in Chicago. Nelson W. Cunningham, President of ASP Nelson Cunningham is President of McLarty Associates, the Scott Gilbert international strategic advisory firm headed by former White Scott Gilbert is a Partner of Gilbert LLP and Managing House Chief of Staff and Special Envoy for the Americas Director of Reneo LLC. Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty, III. Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, USMC (Ret.) Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.) Brigadier General Cheney is the Chief Executive Officer of Vice Admiral Gunn is the President of the Institute of Public ASP. Research at the CNA Corporation, a non-profit corporation in Virginia. Norman R. Augustine The Honorable Chuck Hagel Mr. Augustine was Chairman and Principal Officer of the Chuck Hagel served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense and American Red Cross for nine years and Chairman of the served two terms in the United States Senate (1997-2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Flight Test Reports 07.05.2020 Pilatus PC-21
    CANADIAN DEFENCE REVIEW Special COVID-19 Edition VOLUME 26 ISSUE NO. 2 F-35 Targeting FFCP INSIDE THIS ISSUE COVER STORY F-35 CANADA’S FEATURE INTERVIEW Chief of the Defence Staff Volume 26/Issue 65432 Price $12.95 T COVID-19 Publications Mail Agreement Number 40792504 Defence Industry Steps Up PILATUS AIRCRAFT O Next Gen Trainer 75 INDUSTRY PROFILE DEFENCE P COMPANIES tkMS Canada PILOT TRAINING PILATUS PC-21 FAST JET TRAINING IN THE SHAPE OF A TURBOPROP CDR recently sent Aviation Editor, Joetey Attariwala, to Stans, Switzerland, to visit Pilatus Aircraft. We wanted to learn about the Pilatus PC-21, an advanced single engine turboprop training aircraft that is changing the way air forces train the next generation of military pilots. And for Canada, the PC-21 could be an ideal fit for the FAcT (Future Aircrew Training) project and potentially for F-FLIT (Future Fighter Lead-In Training), as well. Here is our firsthand report from Switzerland. PC-21 with Swiss Air Force F-18 Pilatus, which is nestled in the Nidwalden avionics from Canada’s CMC Electronics and JET-LIKE CHARACTERISTICS valley, was founded in 1939 and is the only the company has also worked with Montreal- The ability to do this lies in the PC-21’s Swiss company developing, manufacturing based, CAE in the past. impressive jet-like flying characteristics along and marketing aircraft to customers around Interestingly, Pilatus flew a PC-21 all the with modern technologies which are suited for the world. The privately held company is a way from Switzerland to CFB Moose Jaw to the novice pilot as much as it is for advanced global leader in the manufacture and sale take part in the 2019 Saskatchewan Airshow.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with SYDNEY M. WOOD C-47 Pilot, Air Force, World War II. 2000 OH 354 1 OH 354 Wood, Sydney M., (1923-2003). Oral History Interview, 2000. User Copy: 2 sound cassette (ca. 105 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 105 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Video Recording: 1 videorecording (ca. 105 min.); ½ inch, color. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: Sydney Wood, a New Jersey native, talks about his World War II service as a pilot with the Army Air Corps in Europe. Wood discusses enlisting with a friend who was turned down by the military for being colorblind, basic training at Brady (Texas) in a PT-19, and having no choice in his assignment to multi-engine transport planes. He touches on coming down with the flu when he was supposed to be getting his assignment. Stationed at Heston Air Force Base (London, England), he discusses flying C-47s loaded with fuel to troops stationed in France and a secretive transfer to Sweden. Wood describes military life in Sweden including not being allowed to tell his family where he was stationed, transporting supplies to Kirkenes (Norway) for the Norwegian underground, the poor rations the Swedish Army provided, getting under-the-table alcohol at Swedish restaurants, and difficulties receiving mail. He emphasizes the engine problems caused by the cold, and he estimates they usually only had two airplanes working out of ten. He recalls his impression of efforts Bernt Balchen made to supply Scandinavian allies.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Equipment and Force Structure Requirements to Meet External Threats, 2032
    IAF Equipment and Force Structure Requirements to Meet External Threats, 2032 Vivek Kapur* In keeping with the theme ‘IAF Deep Multidimensional Change 2032: Imperatives and a Roadmap’, this article focuses on the responses to the external threat challenges that are likely to be face by IAF in 2032. These external challenges have been identified to be the individual Chinese and Pakistani threats as well as a combined Sino-Pak threat. The article confines itself to developing a possible force structure only in terms of numbers of combat and support aircraft of various types for 2032. It contains an examination of the currently planned IAF structure for the year 2022 and beyond, against the war-gamed force requirement for winning wars along our borders while retaining capability to project force in areas of national interest beyond our borders. The article underscores the fact that the current plan for the force structure requires to be enhanced to meet the challenges successfully. INTRODUCTION This article follows ‘Challenges for the Indian Air Force: 2032’ (Vol. 7, No. 1, January-March 2013), dealing with the main challenges Indian Air Force (IAF) is likely to face in 2032, when it completes a century. Here, I assess possible responses to the external challenges posed by the Peoples Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and Pakistan Air Force (PAF). I do so separately in a single-front war scenario against either one and follow it up with a worst case scenario of a simultaneous war against both. I begin * The author was a Research Fellow with the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Lty Classification) XI / ,; (: '1) Ta /', '
    r--- -: . ~.,., . __ ~ DO NOT TYPE IN THIS SPACE 'J. ~ PRIORITY (SecuTlty Classification) XI / _,; (: '1) tA /', '. I )[ I ( ....., .' L , FOREIG.N SRR'VICE DESPATCH I 'IlL 7 L~ u.1.:/., / I Q ,'W'IIW'UPPI FROM DES P. NO . TO THE DEPARTMENT O F S T ATE. WASHINGTON. REF B ACTION OE:PT­ / i- I ,. , ­ I For Dept, '- f) f-v N Use Only >-----,-~=---___f F OT H ER o 5 U 8 J EC T: 1;Il:etJ0'=! 1tls ~ re ito ~ 5 (u) l____-' SECR ET I HEADQU A R TE RS ... UNITED STATES AIR F R CES IN EUROPE AP O 633, US FORCES fU"PLY TO ATTN OF : OPLT 15 November 1959 8UIUE:CT : Change Nr 1 to HQ USAFE OPLAN 114-59 (U) TO: Distribution as Contained in Change Nr 1 to Basic Plan 1. (UNCLASSIFIED) References: a. IvIinutes, Contingency Plans Conference, 1-3 Septemb er 1959, at Evreux Air Base, France, (S)o b. HQ USAFE Programming Plan 512-59, 19 Oct ober 1959 j (S) o 2. (SECRET) Attached is Change Nr 1 to HQ USAFE OPLAN 114-59, 15 July 1959, effective 15 November 19590 Remove and destroy the following pages in accordance with AFR 205-1, or other appropriate service or national directives Insert t he following new pages Basic Plan, Pages 5 through 15 Pages 5 through 15 PEN AND I NK CHANGES: Table of Cont'ents, Basic Plan Delete after "G-We ather" t he paren­ under ANNEXES, Page 4 thetical phrase II(To be published later) rt 0 Insert under Page (s) , opposite Annex G, "1 - 3" a nd cha.nge GRAND TOTAL to 370 Annex A Paragraph 2a, Page 4, line 10 Delete t he l ast two sent ence q of .
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Access Threat and Theater Air Bases
    THE ANTI-ACCESS THREAT AND THEATER AIR BASES by Christopher J. Bowie Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2002 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent public policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking about defense planning and investment strategies for the 21st century. CSBA’s analytic–based research makes clear the inextricable link between defense strategies and budgets in fostering a more effective and efficient de- fense, and the need to transform the US military in light of the emerging military revolution. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundation, corporate and individual grants and contributions, and government contracts. 1730 Rhode Island Ave., NW Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 http://www.csbaonline.org CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ I ABOUT THE AUTHOR ....................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... i Summary Results.................................................................................................................................................. ii What Are the Basing and Logistical
    [Show full text]
  • THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology
    THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology FINAL REPORT January 2008 Prepared by: Van Citters: Historic Preservation, LLC 220 Adams Street SE, Suite A Albuquerque, NM 87108 THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology Final Report January 2008 B-17s over the Hobbs Army Airfield. Photo Courtesy of Don & Dorris Yarbro. By William A. Dodge, Ph.D. The History & Archaeology of the Hobbs Army Air Field ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared to, in part, the stipulations set forth in a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Hobbs and the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer (see Appendix A). The project was funded by the City of Hobbs and its City Commission. Many individuals were integral in the gathering and collating of the data contained within this report. The author wishes to thank Mr. Joe Dearing, City Planner, and members of his staff, particularly Julie Henry and Julie Nymeyer, in the Planning Division for their assistance in coordinating the various facets of this project, particularly their help with organizing the oral history interviews and obtaining historic maps and plans of the Hobbs Army Air Field. Mr. Ray Battaglini of the Hobbs Chamber of Commerce graciously provided access to Chamber files on the air field. Reference librarian, Bob Hamilton, at the Hobbs Public Library offered helpful suggestions on historical sources, and the entire library staff were always helpful and friendly despite my seemingly endless requests for newspaper microfilm reels. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque District, kindly provided copies of research data collected by Tech Law for the remediation assessment that was an invaluable help to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Airpower in the Aftermath of the Gulf
    The Future of Air Power in the Aftermath of the Gulf War Edited by Richard H. Shultz, Jr. Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. International Security Studies Program The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Tufts University Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-5532 July 1992 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Future of air power in the aftermath of the Gulf War/edited by Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., Richard H. Shultz, Jr. p. cm. Includes index. 1. Air power-United States-Congresses . 2. United States. Air Force-Congresses . 3. Persian Gulf War. 1991-Aerial operations, American-Congresses . I. Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. II. Shultz, Richard H., 1947-. UG633. F86 1992 92-8181 358.4'03'0973-dc20 CIP ISBN 1-58566-046-9 First Printing July 1992 Second Printing June 1995 Third Printing August 1997 Fourth Printing August 1998 Fifth Printing March 2001 Sixth Printing July 2002 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the editors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Contents Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . vii PREFACE . ix PART I Strategic Factors Reshaping Strategies and Missions Introduction . 3 Air Power in the New Security Environment . 9 Secretary of the Air Force Donald B . Rice Air Power in US Military Strategy . 17 Dr Edward N. Luttwak The United States as an Aerospace Power in the Emerging Security Environment . 39 Dr Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Employing Air Power in the Twenty-first Century .
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Directory
    NATO’s Directory of Public Information and Public Affairs Officers Annuaire OTAN des Responsables de l’Information et des Affaires publiques DIVISION DIPLOMATIE PUBLIQUE NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION DE L’OTAN B-1110 BRUXELLES B-1110 BRUSSELS BELGIQUE BELGIUM Courriel : [email protected] Email: [email protected] SITE WEB : www.otan.nato.int WEBSITE: www.nato.int 0082-10 NATO GRAPHICS & PRINTING TABLE OF CONTENTS I. NATO HEADQUARTERS BRUSSELS INTERNATIONAL STAFF . I-1 MILITARY COMMITTEE & INTERNATIONAL MILITARY STAFF . I-7 II. NATO COMMAND STRUCTURE ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS SHAPE (Mons/BEL) . II-9 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND BRUNSSUM (NLD) . II-11 HQ ALLIED FORCE COMMAND HEIDELBERG (DEU) . II-12 HQ ALLIED AIR COMMAND RAMSTEIN (DEU) . II-13 HQ ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND NORTHWOOD (GBR) . II-14 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND NAPLES (ITA) . II-15 HQ ALLIED FORCE COMMAND MADRID (ESP) . II-16 HQ ALLIED AIR COMMAND IZMIR (TUR) . II-17 HQ ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND NAPLES (ITA) . II-18 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND LISBON (PRT) . II-19 HQ ALLIED SUBMARINE COMMAND (Norfolk/USA) . II-20 ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION HQ SACT (Norfolk/USA) . II-21 JOINT WARFARE CENTRE (Stavanger/NOR) . II-23 JOINT ANALYSIS LESSONS LEARNED CENTRE (Monsanto/PRT) . see HQ SACT JOINT FORCE TRAINING CENTRE (Bydgoszcz/POL) . II-24 NATO UNDERSEA RESEARCH CENTRE (La Spezia/ITA) . II-25 NATO DEFENSE COLLEGE (Rome/ITA) . II-26 NATO SCHOOL (Oberammergau/DEU) . II-27 NATO MARITIME INTERDICTION OPERATIONAL TRAINING CENTRE (Souda Bay/GRC) . see HQ SACT III. NATO & MULTINATIONAL FORCES / ORGANIZATIONS NAEW & CF, E-3A COMPONENT (Geilenkirchen/DEU) . III-29 NATO COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICES AGENCY (NCSA) (Mons/BEL) .
    [Show full text]
  • Main Elements of the Government Bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total Defence 2021–2025
    Main elements of the Government bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total defence 2021–2025 Main elements of the Government bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total defence 2021–2025 This document is a translation carried out by the Ministry of Defence of the main elements of the Government bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025” (Total Defence 2021-2025). The Government submitted the bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025” to the Riksdag on 15 October 2020. On 15 December 2020, the Riksdag voted in favour of the Government's proposal, among other things, on an overall objective for total defence. This document follows the structure and table of contents of the Government bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025”, and starts with Chapter 4 (Policy Focus). Ministry of Defence 2 (180) Content 4. Policy Focus .................................................................................... 6 5. Security Policy .............................................................................. 13 5.1 Developments in security policy ................................................................... 13 5.1.1 The European security order ................................................................. 13 5.1.2 Developments in Sweden's neighbourhood ........................................ 15 5.1.3 Developments in Europe ....................................................................... 23 5.1.4 North America ........................................................................................ 31 5.1.5 The Middle East .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]