DOCSLIB.ORG

Lty Classification) XI / ,; (: '1) Ta /', '

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lty Classification) XI / ,; (: '1) Ta /', ' r--- -: . ~.,., . __ ~ DO NOT TYPE IN THIS SPACE 'J. ~ PRIORITY (SecuTlty Classification) XI / _,; (: '1) tA /', '. I )[ I ( ....., .' L , FOREIG.N SRR'VICE DESPATCH I 'IlL 7 L~ u.1.:/., / I Q ,'W'IIW'UPPI FROM DES P. NO . TO THE DEPARTMENT O F S T ATE. WASHINGTON. REF B ACTION OE:PT­ / i- I ,. , ­ I For Dept, '- f) f-v N Use Only >-----,-~=---___f F OT H ER o 5 U 8 J EC T: 1;Il:etJ0'=! 1tls ~ re ito ~ 5 (u) l____-' SECR ET I HEADQU A R TE RS ... UNITED STATES AIR F R CES IN EUROPE AP O 633, US FORCES fU"PLY TO ATTN OF : OPLT 15 November 1959 8UIUE:CT : Change Nr 1 to HQ USAFE OPLAN 114-59 (U) TO: Distribution as Contained in Change Nr 1 to Basic Plan 1. (UNCLASSIFIED) References: a. IvIinutes, Contingency Plans Conference, 1-3 Septemb er 1959, at Evreux Air Base, France, (S)o b. HQ USAFE Programming Plan 512-59, 19 Oct ober 1959 j (S) o 2. (SECRET) Attached is Change Nr 1 to HQ USAFE OPLAN 114-59, 15 July 1959, effective 15 November 19590 Remove and destroy the following pages in accordance with AFR 205-1, or other appropriate service or national directives Insert t he following new pages Basic Plan, Pages 5 through 15 Pages 5 through 15 PEN AND I NK CHANGES: Table of Cont'ents, Basic Plan Delete after "G-We ather" t he paren­ under ANNEXES, Page 4 thetical phrase II(To be published later) rt 0 Insert under Page (s) , opposite Annex G, "1 - 3" a nd cha.nge GRAND TOTAL to 370 Annex A Paragraph 2a, Page 4, line 10 Delete t he l ast two sent ence q of . the paragraph beginning with "However:/ when the requir ement ooo oll . Paragraph 2c, Page 4 Delete the words "and Command PostR1 ~ Paragraph 2c(3), Page 4 De l ete t he entire pa~agraph o Paragraph 3b, ·Page 4 Change "US Ai r l ift Task Group (Prov) (reduced) fl, to IIUS Airlift Task Wing (Prov) (reduced) 11 0 Paragraph 3c, ?age 5 Delete the f inal portion of the pa a­ graph begi nning wit h , !tas augment ed 11 under 00 0 0 and insert after the word II and 11 , the words II CASE 11 1'0 Paragraph 3e, Page 5 Delete all of t he present par agraph after the wor ds II CASE 1 .11 0 . Paragraph 5~,. Page 7 Change t he l a st sentence of t he present paragraph t o read, !tHm.;ever , operational control of air bases will be normal with Commanders, 731 0t h Suppor t Gr oup and 7 01st Air Base Wing providing suppor t as herein USAFE Desio C-7209-59 s E Pcl~rtT Paragraph 5c, Page 7 In the first and second sentences change IlAirlift Task Groupll to IIAirlift Task Wing" 0 Appendix 1 to Annex A Paragraph 2c, Page 1 Change "Airlift Task Group" to "Airlift Task Wing"o Paragraph 5a, Page 3 Change "Airlift Task Group" to "Airlift Task Wing 110 Paragraph 5b, Page 3 In first sentence of paragraph, change "Airlift Task Group" to "Airlift Task Wing" 0 Annex L Title Page, Page 1 Delete the word "SERVICES" from titleo Table of Contents, Page 2 Delete the word "SERVICES" from the title at top of page o Table of Contents, Page 2 Under Paragraph 3, insert between the present sub-paragraphs band c, a new sub-paragraph "c", "Commander, 17th Air Force" and reletter sub­ sequent sub-paragraphs accordingly .. Table of Contents, Page 2 Under relettered Paragraph 3e, change ''7100th Support Wing" to "7310th Support Group"o Table -of Contents, Page 2 Under APPENDICES, delete "Info Services" from the title and sub­ stitute therefor the word "Information" 0 Title at Top of Page 3 Delete the word "SERVICES" from the title o Paragraph 3, Page 4 Insert between present sub-paragraphs band c, a new sub-paragraph "c" as follows; "Commander, 17th Air Force will: Provide personnel as indicated in Appendix 1 0 II Reletter subsequent sub-paragraphs accordir~lyo Paragraph 3, Page 4 In relettered sub-paragraph d, change "ATG" to "ATW" 0 Paragraph 3, Page 4 Under relettered sub-paragraph e, change "Commander 7100th Support Wing will: t1 to "Commander 7310th Support Group will:"o Delete present sub-paragraph (1) and re­ number present paragraph (2) as ~ . t' ~ ·~\· ; ; .1 paragraph (1) .. Appendix 1 to Annex L _ .. ~ . ;. '. : .. r c· t. Title at top of Page 1 Delete the word rrSERVICES" from titIe. 2 .. Under Rhein-Hain JAFIC Delete under Source all references and Tempelhof JAFIC, Page 1 toli7100 Sup Wg!1 and subst itute therefor tl 17A} '0 J .. (UNCLASSIFIED) Annex G, to HQ USAFE OPLAN 114-59, not previously published, is attached o 4" (UNCLASSIFIED) This correspondence is classified SECRET because it reveals details of a similarly classified contingency plano Regrading classification cannot be predetermined 0 FOR THE COMMANDER-TN-CHIEF: ~;~~ 2 Atchs Major USAF 10 Change Nr o 1, 15 Nov 59, (3) E e cutive, LCS/O 2 .. Annex G, 20 Oct 59 ;, (8 ) 3 OPERATI ONS PLAN) HEADQUARTERS US AIR FORCES IN EUROPE SERI AL NR 114-59) APO 633 , US FORCES 15 November 1959 - OOO I Z REFEREN CES 0 US CINCEUR Message, EC 9-6249, 21 November 1958 US Embassy, Bonn, Message, USAFE 220, 21 Novemb er 1958 US CINCEUR Message, EC 9-6262, 22 November 1958 US Embassy, Bonn, Message, USAFE 227, 25 November 1958 TASK ORGANIZATIONS 0 Seventeenth Air Force Joint Airlift Task Force (Prov) 322d Air Division (CC) Airlift Task Wing (Prov) 501st Tactical Control Wing EAME AACS Area 2d Weather Wing 7310thSupport Group 7101st Air Base Wing 1. SITUATION o (SECRET) One of the ma jor ob ject ives of USSR f o eign policy has been aimed at Allied recognition of the East German regime to further USSR-East German reunification plans o In furtherance of this objective, the USSR may permit German Demo cratic Republi c (GDR ) p e rs o n~~e l t o man check points currently held by Soviets at highway and r ail cont r ol poi nts whi l e retaining definitive control authority , attempt to subs tit .. IJe GDR personnel for USSR personnel in the Ber l in Air Safety Center, and/or permit GDR authorities to attempt to extend t heir contr ols over offi cial Allied personnel in the GDR o Inasmuch as neither t he US, UK nor FRA- CE r ecognize the GDR, one or more of these actions will r esul t in a sel f ­ imposed surface blockage of US, UK and FRENCH mi l i tar y t r ansportation only:, and the Berlin Airlift Plan, HQ USAFE OPLAN 102-59, wi l l not be impl emented. At the time Allied official travel by motor vehicle and mi l i tary train is di scontinued, it will be necessary to supply the Allied garri sons by air­ l ift. In furtherance of the US policy regarding BERLI N, this plan establishes US pr ocedures for conducting airlift operations to suppor t t he US garrison in BEELIN, and the movement of cert.ain other non-Allied car go and personnel. Specific provision is made for airlift operati ons t o: Supply the US BERLIN garrison; Transport official personnel; Transport Federal Republic of Germany mail; Fly out refugees; and, Transport non-official traveler s to the greatest extent possible. US AF E DCS/O C-7 20 9-59 HQ USAFE OPLAN NR 114-59 Change Nr . 1, 15 Nov 59 5 a" Enemy Forces o See current USAFE Intelligence Estimat es and summaries 0 b o Friendly Forces o (1) US CINCEUR will: Make available t he forces listed hereino (2) CINCUSAFE will: (a) Upon implementation of this plan, act ivate on a mlnimum scale, the US Joint Airlift Task Force Head~lart er s described i n Annex E, RQ USAFE OPLAN 102-59, and designate the Commander , Seventeenth Air Force, as . commander, additional duty 0 (b) Under CASE I and CASE II, as set forth i n Annex A provide necessary aircraft and resources currently available (on a 24-hour basis) within USAFE to sustain an airlift capabil i ty of approximatel y 70 tons per dayo (c) Provide logistical support f or US Army personne l on USAFE bases in support of the airlifto See Paragraph 4, Administration and Logisticso (3) CINCUSAREUR will: (a) Provide for the ground traffic management and t r ans­ port functions pertaining to the flow of airlift cargo to and f rom airheads and terminals by placing the appropriate services of a US Ar my Airl ift Support Command (USAASC) under the operational control of the Commander, Joint Airlift Task Force (JATF)o (b) Provide representation on the staff of the Joint Airlift Task Force Commander as requiredo See Annex E, HQ USAFE OPLAN 102- 590 (c ) Provide liaison as r equested by the Ai rlift Task Wing Commander" (d) Furnish supplies for t he support of US military forces i n BERLI N. (e) Provide representation to civilian and military agencies a s may be required under CASE I I , set forth in paragraph 1b, Annex A, Concept of Operations o (4) British and French forces will: Co operate in quadripartite . action to maintain the Allied position i n BERLIN o (5) Federal Republic of Ger many for ces and agencies will: (a) Cooperate, as requested , to a ssi st the Allied force s to mLiDtain their position in BERLING (b) Provide representation as required , on the Four Power Committee established for conduct of operations under CASE II, set fort h i n paragraph 1b, Annex A, Concept of Operations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Realignment and Indian Air Power Doctrine
    Realignment and Indian Airpower Doctrine Challenges in an Evolving Strategic Context Dr. Christina Goulter Prof. Harsh Pant Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed or implied in the Journal are those of the authors and should not be construed as carrying the official sanction of the Department of Defense, Air Force, Air Education and Training Command, Air University, or other agencies or departments of the US government. This article may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. If it is reproduced, the Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs requests a courtesy line. ith a shift in the balance of power in the Far East, as well as multiple chal- Wlenges in the wider international security environment, several nations in the Indo-Pacific region have undergone significant changes in their defense pos- tures. This is particularly the case with India, which has gone from a regional, largely Pakistan-focused, perspective to one involving global influence and power projection. This has presented ramifications for all the Indian armed services, but especially the Indian Air Force (IAF). Over the last decade, the IAF has been trans- forming itself from a principally army-support instrument to a broad spectrum air force, and this prompted a radical revision of Indian aipower doctrine in 2012. It is akin to Western airpower thought, but much of the latest doctrine is indigenous and demonstrates some unique conceptual work, not least in the way maritime air- power is used to protect Indian territories in the Indian Ocean and safeguard sea lines of communication. Because of this, it is starting to have traction in Anglo- American defense circles.1 The current Indian emphases on strategic reach and con- ventional deterrence have been prompted by other events as well, not least the 1999 Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, which demonstrated that India lacked a balanced defense apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions for More Information on This Publication, Visit
    C O R P O R A T I O N ALAN J. VICK, SEAN M. ZEIGLER, JULIA BRACKUP, JOHN SPEED MEYERS Air Base Defense Rethinking Army and Air Force Roles and Functions For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR4368 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0500-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The growing cruise and ballistic missile threat to U.S. Air Force bases in Europe has led Headquarters U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East
    U.S. Military Bases and Facilities in the Middle East Fact Sheet - Matthew Wallin i June 2018 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable Gary Hart, Chairman Emeritus Admiral William Fallon, USN (Ret.) Senator Hart served the State of Colorado in the U.S. Senate Admiral Fallon has led U.S. and Allied forces and played a and was a member of the Committee on Armed Services leadership role in military and diplomatic matters at the highest during his tenure. levels of the U.S. government. Governor Christine Todd Whitman, Chairperson Raj Fernando Christine Todd Whitman is the President of the Whitman Strategy Group, a consulting firm that specializes in energy Raj Fernando is CEO and founder of Chopper Trading, a and environmental issues. technology based trading firm headquartered in Chicago. Nelson W. Cunningham, President of ASP Nelson Cunningham is President of McLarty Associates, the Scott Gilbert international strategic advisory firm headed by former White Scott Gilbert is a Partner of Gilbert LLP and Managing House Chief of Staff and Special Envoy for the Americas Director of Reneo LLC. Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty, III. Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, USMC (Ret.) Vice Admiral Lee Gunn, USN (Ret.) Brigadier General Cheney is the Chief Executive Officer of Vice Admiral Gunn is the President of the Institute of Public ASP. Research at the CNA Corporation, a non-profit corporation in Virginia. Norman R. Augustine The Honorable Chuck Hagel Mr. Augustine was Chairman and Principal Officer of the Chuck Hagel served as the 24th U.S. Secretary of Defense and American Red Cross for nine years and Chairman of the served two terms in the United States Senate (1997-2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Flight Test Reports 07.05.2020 Pilatus PC-21
    CANADIAN DEFENCE REVIEW Special COVID-19 Edition VOLUME 26 ISSUE NO. 2 F-35 Targeting FFCP INSIDE THIS ISSUE COVER STORY F-35 CANADA’S FEATURE INTERVIEW Chief of the Defence Staff Volume 26/Issue 65432 Price $12.95 T COVID-19 Publications Mail Agreement Number 40792504 Defence Industry Steps Up PILATUS AIRCRAFT O Next Gen Trainer 75 INDUSTRY PROFILE DEFENCE P COMPANIES tkMS Canada PILOT TRAINING PILATUS PC-21 FAST JET TRAINING IN THE SHAPE OF A TURBOPROP CDR recently sent Aviation Editor, Joetey Attariwala, to Stans, Switzerland, to visit Pilatus Aircraft. We wanted to learn about the Pilatus PC-21, an advanced single engine turboprop training aircraft that is changing the way air forces train the next generation of military pilots. And for Canada, the PC-21 could be an ideal fit for the FAcT (Future Aircrew Training) project and potentially for F-FLIT (Future Fighter Lead-In Training), as well. Here is our firsthand report from Switzerland. PC-21 with Swiss Air Force F-18 Pilatus, which is nestled in the Nidwalden avionics from Canada’s CMC Electronics and JET-LIKE CHARACTERISTICS valley, was founded in 1939 and is the only the company has also worked with Montreal- The ability to do this lies in the PC-21’s Swiss company developing, manufacturing based, CAE in the past. impressive jet-like flying characteristics along and marketing aircraft to customers around Interestingly, Pilatus flew a PC-21 all the with modern technologies which are suited for the world. The privately held company is a way from Switzerland to CFB Moose Jaw to the novice pilot as much as it is for advanced global leader in the manufacture and sale take part in the 2019 Saskatchewan Airshow.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with SYDNEY M. WOOD C-47 Pilot, Air Force, World War II. 2000 OH 354 1 OH 354 Wood, Sydney M., (1923-2003). Oral History Interview, 2000. User Copy: 2 sound cassette (ca. 105 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 105 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Video Recording: 1 videorecording (ca. 105 min.); ½ inch, color. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: Sydney Wood, a New Jersey native, talks about his World War II service as a pilot with the Army Air Corps in Europe. Wood discusses enlisting with a friend who was turned down by the military for being colorblind, basic training at Brady (Texas) in a PT-19, and having no choice in his assignment to multi-engine transport planes. He touches on coming down with the flu when he was supposed to be getting his assignment. Stationed at Heston Air Force Base (London, England), he discusses flying C-47s loaded with fuel to troops stationed in France and a secretive transfer to Sweden. Wood describes military life in Sweden including not being allowed to tell his family where he was stationed, transporting supplies to Kirkenes (Norway) for the Norwegian underground, the poor rations the Swedish Army provided, getting under-the-table alcohol at Swedish restaurants, and difficulties receiving mail. He emphasizes the engine problems caused by the cold, and he estimates they usually only had two airplanes working out of ten. He recalls his impression of efforts Bernt Balchen made to supply Scandinavian allies.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Equipment and Force Structure Requirements to Meet External Threats, 2032
    IAF Equipment and Force Structure Requirements to Meet External Threats, 2032 Vivek Kapur* In keeping with the theme ‘IAF Deep Multidimensional Change 2032: Imperatives and a Roadmap’, this article focuses on the responses to the external threat challenges that are likely to be face by IAF in 2032. These external challenges have been identified to be the individual Chinese and Pakistani threats as well as a combined Sino-Pak threat. The article confines itself to developing a possible force structure only in terms of numbers of combat and support aircraft of various types for 2032. It contains an examination of the currently planned IAF structure for the year 2022 and beyond, against the war-gamed force requirement for winning wars along our borders while retaining capability to project force in areas of national interest beyond our borders. The article underscores the fact that the current plan for the force structure requires to be enhanced to meet the challenges successfully. INTRODUCTION This article follows ‘Challenges for the Indian Air Force: 2032’ (Vol. 7, No. 1, January-March 2013), dealing with the main challenges Indian Air Force (IAF) is likely to face in 2032, when it completes a century. Here, I assess possible responses to the external challenges posed by the Peoples Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) and Pakistan Air Force (PAF). I do so separately in a single-front war scenario against either one and follow it up with a worst case scenario of a simultaneous war against both. I begin * The author was a Research Fellow with the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anti-Access Threat and Theater Air Bases
    THE ANTI-ACCESS THREAT AND THEATER AIR BASES by Christopher J. Bowie Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments 2002 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent public policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking about defense planning and investment strategies for the 21st century. CSBA’s analytic–based research makes clear the inextricable link between defense strategies and budgets in fostering a more effective and efficient de- fense, and the need to transform the US military in light of the emerging military revolution. CSBA is directed by Dr. Andrew F. Krepinevich and funded by foundation, corporate and individual grants and contributions, and government contracts. 1730 Rhode Island Ave., NW Suite 912 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7990 http://www.csbaonline.org CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................................ I ABOUT THE AUTHOR ....................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... i Summary Results.................................................................................................................................................. ii What Are the Basing and Logistical
    [Show full text]
  • THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology
    THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology FINAL REPORT January 2008 Prepared by: Van Citters: Historic Preservation, LLC 220 Adams Street SE, Suite A Albuquerque, NM 87108 THE HOBBS ARMY AIR FIELD: Its History & Archaeology Final Report January 2008 B-17s over the Hobbs Army Airfield. Photo Courtesy of Don & Dorris Yarbro. By William A. Dodge, Ph.D. The History & Archaeology of the Hobbs Army Air Field ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared to, in part, the stipulations set forth in a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Hobbs and the New Mexico State Historic Preservation Officer (see Appendix A). The project was funded by the City of Hobbs and its City Commission. Many individuals were integral in the gathering and collating of the data contained within this report. The author wishes to thank Mr. Joe Dearing, City Planner, and members of his staff, particularly Julie Henry and Julie Nymeyer, in the Planning Division for their assistance in coordinating the various facets of this project, particularly their help with organizing the oral history interviews and obtaining historic maps and plans of the Hobbs Army Air Field. Mr. Ray Battaglini of the Hobbs Chamber of Commerce graciously provided access to Chamber files on the air field. Reference librarian, Bob Hamilton, at the Hobbs Public Library offered helpful suggestions on historical sources, and the entire library staff were always helpful and friendly despite my seemingly endless requests for newspaper microfilm reels. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque District, kindly provided copies of research data collected by Tech Law for the remediation assessment that was an invaluable help to this project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Airpower in the Aftermath of the Gulf
    The Future of Air Power in the Aftermath of the Gulf War Edited by Richard H. Shultz, Jr. Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. International Security Studies Program The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Tufts University Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-5532 July 1992 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Future of air power in the aftermath of the Gulf War/edited by Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., Richard H. Shultz, Jr. p. cm. Includes index. 1. Air power-United States-Congresses . 2. United States. Air Force-Congresses . 3. Persian Gulf War. 1991-Aerial operations, American-Congresses . I. Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. II. Shultz, Richard H., 1947-. UG633. F86 1992 92-8181 358.4'03'0973-dc20 CIP ISBN 1-58566-046-9 First Printing July 1992 Second Printing June 1995 Third Printing August 1997 Fourth Printing August 1998 Fifth Printing March 2001 Sixth Printing July 2002 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the editors and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Contents Page DISCLAIMER . ii FOREWORD . vii PREFACE . ix PART I Strategic Factors Reshaping Strategies and Missions Introduction . 3 Air Power in the New Security Environment . 9 Secretary of the Air Force Donald B . Rice Air Power in US Military Strategy . 17 Dr Edward N. Luttwak The United States as an Aerospace Power in the Emerging Security Environment . 39 Dr Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. Employing Air Power in the Twenty-first Century .
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Directory
    NATO’s Directory of Public Information and Public Affairs Officers Annuaire OTAN des Responsables de l’Information et des Affaires publiques DIVISION DIPLOMATIE PUBLIQUE NATO PUBLIC DIPLOMACY DIVISION DE L’OTAN B-1110 BRUXELLES B-1110 BRUSSELS BELGIQUE BELGIUM Courriel : [email protected] Email: [email protected] SITE WEB : www.otan.nato.int WEBSITE: www.nato.int 0082-10 NATO GRAPHICS & PRINTING TABLE OF CONTENTS I. NATO HEADQUARTERS BRUSSELS INTERNATIONAL STAFF . I-1 MILITARY COMMITTEE & INTERNATIONAL MILITARY STAFF . I-7 II. NATO COMMAND STRUCTURE ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS SHAPE (Mons/BEL) . II-9 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND BRUNSSUM (NLD) . II-11 HQ ALLIED FORCE COMMAND HEIDELBERG (DEU) . II-12 HQ ALLIED AIR COMMAND RAMSTEIN (DEU) . II-13 HQ ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND NORTHWOOD (GBR) . II-14 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND NAPLES (ITA) . II-15 HQ ALLIED FORCE COMMAND MADRID (ESP) . II-16 HQ ALLIED AIR COMMAND IZMIR (TUR) . II-17 HQ ALLIED MARITIME COMMAND NAPLES (ITA) . II-18 HQ ALLIED JOINT FORCE COMMAND LISBON (PRT) . II-19 HQ ALLIED SUBMARINE COMMAND (Norfolk/USA) . II-20 ALLIED COMMAND TRANSFORMATION HQ SACT (Norfolk/USA) . II-21 JOINT WARFARE CENTRE (Stavanger/NOR) . II-23 JOINT ANALYSIS LESSONS LEARNED CENTRE (Monsanto/PRT) . see HQ SACT JOINT FORCE TRAINING CENTRE (Bydgoszcz/POL) . II-24 NATO UNDERSEA RESEARCH CENTRE (La Spezia/ITA) . II-25 NATO DEFENSE COLLEGE (Rome/ITA) . II-26 NATO SCHOOL (Oberammergau/DEU) . II-27 NATO MARITIME INTERDICTION OPERATIONAL TRAINING CENTRE (Souda Bay/GRC) . see HQ SACT III. NATO & MULTINATIONAL FORCES / ORGANIZATIONS NAEW & CF, E-3A COMPONENT (Geilenkirchen/DEU) . III-29 NATO COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SERVICES AGENCY (NCSA) (Mons/BEL) .
    [Show full text]
  • Main Elements of the Government Bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total Defence 2021–2025
    Main elements of the Government bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total defence 2021–2025 Main elements of the Government bill Totalförsvaret 2021–2025 Total defence 2021–2025 This document is a translation carried out by the Ministry of Defence of the main elements of the Government bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025” (Total Defence 2021-2025). The Government submitted the bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025” to the Riksdag on 15 October 2020. On 15 December 2020, the Riksdag voted in favour of the Government's proposal, among other things, on an overall objective for total defence. This document follows the structure and table of contents of the Government bill “Totalförsvaret 2021–2025”, and starts with Chapter 4 (Policy Focus). Ministry of Defence 2 (180) Content 4. Policy Focus .................................................................................... 6 5. Security Policy .............................................................................. 13 5.1 Developments in security policy ................................................................... 13 5.1.1 The European security order ................................................................. 13 5.1.2 Developments in Sweden's neighbourhood ........................................ 15 5.1.3 Developments in Europe ....................................................................... 23 5.1.4 North America ........................................................................................ 31 5.1.5 The Middle East .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of England Air Force Base in Central Louisiana
    University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 12-19-2008 Military Base Closure and Community Transformation: The Case of England Air Force Base in Central Louisiana Phyllis E. Mayo University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Mayo, Phyllis E., "Military Base Closure and Community Transformation: The Case of England Air Force Base in Central Louisiana" (2008). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 898. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/898 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Military Base Closure and Community Transformation: The Case of England Air Force Base in Central Louisiana A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Urban Studies Concentration in Management by Phyllis E. Mayo B.S. Louisiana State University, 1988 December 2008 © Phyllis E.
    [Show full text]