DOCSLIB.ORG

The German Armed Forces Suffered 80% of Its Military Deaths in the Eastern Front

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The German Armed Forces Suffered 80% of Its Military Deaths in the Eastern Front The German armed forces suffered 80% of its military deaths in the Eastern Front. | Winston Churchill Urged the US to Nuke Moscow A document newly released from FBI archives reveals that in 1947 Churchill had urged US Senator Styles Bridges to persuade Truman to launch a nuclear attack on the USSR (http://russia- insider.com/de/politics/2014/11/11/09-00-21am/winston_churchill_urged_us_nuke_moscow ) FYI: The Eastern Front of World War II was a theatre of conflict between the European Axis powers and co-belligerent Finlandagainst the Soviet Union, Poland and other allies, which encompassed Northern, Southern and Central and Eastern Europe from 22 June 1941 to 9 May 1945. It has been known as the Great Patriotic War (Russian: Великая Отечественная Война) in the former Soviet Union and in modern Russia, while in Germany it was called the Eastern Front (German: die Ostfront), the Eastern Campaign (der Ostfeldzug) or the Russian Campaign (der Rußlandfeldzug). The battles on the Eastern Front constituted the largest military confrontation in history.They were characterized by unprecedented ferocity, wholesale destruction, mass deportations, and immense loss of life variously due to combat, starvation, exposure, disease, and massacres. The Eastern Front, as the site of nearly all extermination camps, death marches, ghettos, and the majority of pogroms, was central to the Holocaust. Of the estimated 70 million deaths attributed to World War II, over 30 million, many of them civilian, occurred on the Eastern Front. The Eastern Front was decisive in determining the outcome of World War II, eventually serving as the main reason for Germany's defeat. It resulted in the destruction of the Third Reich, the partition of Germany for nearly half a century and the rise of the Soviet Union as a military and industrial superpower. The two principal belligerent powers were Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, along with their respective allies. Though never engaged in military action in the Eastern Front, the United Kingdom and the United States both provided substantial material aid in the form of the Lend-Lease to the Soviet Union. The joint German– Finnish operations across the northernmost Finnish–Soviet border and in the Murmansk region are considered part of the Eastern Front. In addition, the Soviet–FinnishContinuation War may also be considered the northern flank of the Eastern Front. The Unknown War (Russian: "Великая Отечественная Война" (The Great Patriotic War) or "Неизвестная война" (The Unknown War) is an American documentary television series. The 20- part series documents the World War II conflict between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. The show was produced and syndicated for international distribution by Air Time International, and the executive producer was Fred Weiner. Each episode is about 48 minutes long, similar in format to The World at War. The footage was edited from over 3.5 million feet of film taken by Soviet camera crews from the first day of the war, 22 June 1941, to the Soviet entry into Berlin in May 1945. Most of these films have never been seen outside this documentary series. The series is hosted by Academy Award Winner Burt Lancaster, who spent three weeks in eight cities in the USSR for location filming. Film footage from Soviet archives comprises a major portion of the series, supplemented by film from both the United States and British archives. Appearing in exclusive interviews would be Russian Commanders like Georgi Zhukov and Vasily Chuikov. Other interviews shot for the series included Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev and Averell Harriman, who was U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union during WWII. The series was produced with Soviet cooperation after the release of The World at War, which the Soviet government felt paid insufficient attention to their part in World War II. Released in 1978, The Unknown War is sympathetic to the Soviet struggle against Nazi Germany. It was quickly withdrawn from TV airings after it ran in 1978, possibly because its tone was at odds with the growing tensions between East and West after the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan. Later it returned to airings on cable, including A&E, the History Channel and YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OuuthpJmAig FYI: The Soviet Banner of Victory (Russian: Знамя Победы, Znamya Pobedy) is the banner raised by the Red Army soldiers on the Reichstag building in Berlin, on April 30, 1945, the day that Adolf Hitler committed suicide. It was raised by three Soviet soldiers: Alexei Berest, Mikhail Yegorov, and Meliton Kantaria, from Ukraine, Russia, and Georgia respectively. The Victory Banner, made under battlefield conditions, is the official symbol of the Victory of the Soviet people against Nazi Germany during the second world war. It is also believed to be one of the national treasures of Russia and a symbol of the Transnistria. The Cyrillic inscription reads: 150th Rifle, Order of Kutuzov 2nd class, Idritsa Division, 79th Rifle Corps, 3rd Shock Army, 1st Byelorussian Front. Although this flag was not the only one to be hoisted on the Reichstag, it was the first and only survivor of all the "official" flags specially prepared to be raised there. On May 9, during Victory Day parade in Moscow, a copy of Victory Banner #5 is carried immediately behind the Russian flag by members of the 154th Moscow Commandant's Regiment Honor and Colors Guards. According to the Law of the Russian Federation, the Banner of Victory is to be stored forever in a place which provides its safety and public availability. WORLD WAR FACTS: World War I Georgia fought in the first world war within Russia and some at side of Germany. 200,000 soldiers were sent to the war out of a population of 1.5 million. 15,000 Soldiers fought at side of Germany in the Georgian Legion. World War II Joseph Stalin, born Joseph Jughashvili in Georgia. Georgia sent up to 700,000 soldiers at side of Soviet Union out of a 3 million total population to the war, 300,000 soldiers died and around 400,000 soldiers returned. 30,000 Fought at side of the Axis within the Georgian Legion, some fought out of Georgian Legion in SS and Luftwaffe. The 882nd Infantry Battalion of the Georgian Legion under the command of Shalva Loladze had revolted against the Germans on 5 April 1945 in Dutch region of Texel. (See Georgian uprising on Texel) Notable Georgian commanders of World War II: Joseph Stalin, Konstantine Leselidze, Vladimir Janjgava, Shalva Maglakelidze, Archil Gelovani. Other notable Georgian soldiers in World War II are Dimitri Amilakhvari, Noe Adamia, Meliton Kantaria, Geno Adamia, Vasilij Kvachantiradze, Yaroslav Iosseliani. http://www.archives.gov.ge/en/home ----------- FYI: Human Rights Watch: "Instead of protecting civilians, Russian forces allowed South Ossetian forces who followed in their path to engage in wanton and wide-scale pillage and burning of Georgian homes and to kill, beat, rape, and threaten civilians," said Denber. "Such deliberate attacks are war crimes, and if committed as part of a widespread or systematic pattern, they may be prosecuted as a crime against humanity." According to the HRW, 15,000 of 17,500 Georgians have left South Ossetia prior to the arrival of the Russian soldiers --> READ THIS: http://www.fpri.org/articles/2015/02/russias-quiet-annexation-south-ossetia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas De Waal the Caucasus
    THE CAUCASUS This page intentionally left blank THE CAUCASUS AN INTRODUCTION Thomas de Waal 1 2010 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data de Waal, Thomas. The Caucasus : an introduction / Thomas de Waal. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-539976-9; 978-0-19-539977-6 (pbk.) 1. Caucasus Region—Politics and government. 2. Caucasus Region—History. 3. Caucasus Region—Relations—Russia. 4. Russia—Relations—Caucasus Region. 5. Caucasus Region—Relations—Soviet Union. 6. Soviet Union—Relations—Caucasus Region. I. Title. DK509.D33 2010 947.5—dc22 2009052376 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper To Zoe This page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scramble Round 4 Finals
    The Scramble Round 4 ­ Finals 1. One of these artifacts with arms is known as a tevavor, while Momik, credited with the design of Noravank Monastery, designed many of these. The most extensive collection of these artifacts is at Noratus, while the biggest one in the world is located in Jugha, in modern­day Azerbaijan. Listed in 2000 under UNESCO, these objects often have rosettes and botanical motifs, in addition to crosses. For the point, name these Armenian “cross­stones” which are ubiquitious in Armenian cemeteries. ANSWER: ​khachkar​s 2. The last speaker of one of these languages died in 1992 and had lived in the Balikesir region of Turkey. In one of these languages, referring to wara and bara would suggest that one is speaking directly to a man about his horse and in the second case, a woman. Many speakers of these languages now live in Jordan, Iraq, and Egypt, and Ubykh has no native speakers. Including such languages as Abaza and Kabardian, the eastern group includes the Nakh languages. For the point, name this language group. ANSWER: ​North​west ​Caucasian languages 3.One musical group performing in this language was called Zugasi Berepe, whose founder Kazim Koyuncu (Koy­oon­jew), sang a popular song called “Didou Nana.” A newspaper in this language, Agani Murutsxi (muruts­khi) recalls Iskenderi Tzitasi’s 1929 newspaper, Mch’ita Murutsxi, or “Red Star.” Spoken in towns like Findikli and Hopa, it is written in a Latin alphabet, and most of its speakers are Muslim. For the point, name this Georgian language, spoken in Turkey mostly near Rize (ree­zay).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Togetherness TRACES
    of Togetherness TRACES TRACES of Togetherness not bEttEr not worsE just diffErEnt ISBNISBN 978-3-943897-44-9978-3-943897-44-9 0 00 9 0 9 9 0 9 0 9 783943 897449 9 783943 897449 The “Traces of Togetherness” project is supported by the Federal Foreign Office within the programme “Expanding Cooperation with Civil Society in the Eastern Partnership Countries and Russia”. citizEn journalism in thE south caucasus and russia TRACES of Togetherness Следы Eдинcтвa Birliyin izləri Միասնության հետքեր The “Traces of Togetherness” project is supported by the Federal Foreign Office within the programme “Expanding Cooperation with Civil Society in the Eastern Partnership Countries and Russia”. თანაარსებობის კვალი “Traces of Togetherness” is a project of Kultur Aktiv e.V. Spuren des Miteinanders Imprint Editors: Kultur Aktiv e.V. Editorial Bautzner Straße 49 | 01099 Dresden | Germany n summer 2018, on the banks of the Volga river in the and diversity of all Soviet republics. Each country could kulturaktiv.org | [email protected] Russian town of Ulyanovsk, something unusual hap- present itself to the others in its “own” territory on the I pened. During a citizen journalism workshop, curious banks of the Volga with sculptures, pavilions and coun- Matthias Schumann people from Armenia and Azerbaijan, with likeminded try- specific flora. As an official but ambivalent symbol individuals from Russia, searched for traces of their own of diversity within unity, and initially part of the greater Editorial Office: René Kaufmann, Christine Müller, Matthias Schumann respective national South Caucasian culture and histories Lenin Memorial Complex, the park became a reflection together. of the internal relationships between the former Soviet Layout/Satz: Mirko Däumler | www.daeumler.com republics.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Names: (Re-)Naming and Place-Name Politics in Post-Socialist Countries
    Contested Names: (Re-)Naming and Place-Name Politics in Post-Socialist Countries Ideology and Politics Journal ―Issue 1(15), 2020 Natalia Kudriavtseva and Mykola Homanyuk, editors ІДЕОЛОГІЯ І ПОЛІТИКА ИДЕОЛОГИЯ И ПОЛИТИКА IDEOLOGY AND POLITICS © 2020 Foundation for Good Politics ISSN 2227-6068 Contested Names: (Re-)Naming and Place-Name Politics in Post-Socialist Countries ― Issue 1(15), 2020 Editors of this issue: Natalia Kudriavtseva and Mykola Homanyuk Ideology and Politics Journal © 2019 Foundation for Good Politics ISSN 2227-6068 Address: via Giuseppe Compagnoni, 33, Milan 20129 Italy IPJ Editorial Board IPJ Editorial Team Korine Amacher, University of Genève Mikhail Minakov, editor-in-chief Natalya Amelchenko, National University “Kyiv- Mykhailo Koltsov, deputy editor-in-chief Mohyla Academy” Christopher Donohue, deputy editor-in-chief Dominique Arel, University of Ottawa Tetyana Bezruk, editor Stefano Bianchini, University of Bologna Pavlo Bakhmut, editor Valer Bulgakau, Arche Magazine, Minsk Christy Monet Brandly, editor Vitaly Chernetsky, University of Kansas Emily Couch, editor Alexander Etkind, European Institute University Oleksandr Holubov, editor Vladimir Fadeev, Institute of Philosophy, Kyiv Halyna Vasylenko, editor Alexander Filonenko, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Rory Finnin, University of Cambridge George Grabowicz, Harvard University Sergiy Kurbatov, Institute of Higher Education, NAES of Ukraine Pavlo Kutuev, Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute Vadym Menzhulin, National University “Kyiv- Mohyla Academy”
    [Show full text]
  • Xenophobia, Freedom of Conscience and Anti-Extremism in Russia in 2017
    SoVA CENTER FoR INFoRMATIoN AND ANALYSIS Xenophobia, Freedom of Conscience and Anti-Extremism in Russia in 2017 A collection of annual reports by the SoVA Center for Information and Analysis Moscow 2018 UDC 323.1(470+571)(082.1)«2017» BBC 66.094я43+66.3(2Рос),54я43 Table of Contents X44 Natalia Yudina X44 Xenophobia, Freedom of Conscience and Anti-Extremism in Russia in 2017: A collection of annual reports by the SoVA Center for Information and Analysis; Xenophobia in Figures: Hate Crime in Russia and Efforts to Counteract [Kravchenko Maria, Sibireva Olga, Yudina Natalia / Ed. by Verkhovsky Alexander] It in 2017 ................................................................................................... 6 – М.: SOVA Center, 2018. – 127 pp.: tables Summary ............................................................................................ 6 ISBN 978-5-98418-044-3 Systematic Racist and Neo-Nazi Violence ........................................... 7 Attacks against Ethnic “Others” ................................................... 8 This collection of reports summarizes all the major areas of work addressed by the SOVA Center for Information and Analysis in 2017. Attacks against Ideological Opponents ......................................... 9 Traditionally, we are presenting our annual reports on problems with realizing the right to freedom of conscience and the principle of state secularism, and on misuse of measures to Other Attacks ............................................................................. 11 counteract
    [Show full text]
  • No. 19, May 12, 2019
    INSIDE: l Rare Ukrainian dictionaries at the Library of Congress – page 4 l Ukraine’s Day of Remembrance and Reconciliation – page 8 l Our community: Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco – pages 14-15 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXVII No. 19 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 12, 2019 $2.00 Ambassador Yovanovitch’s Zelensky wavers on parliamentary elections, early replacement sparks outcry while outlining administration priorities by Mark Raczkiewycz by Matthew Dubas KYIV – Newly elected President PARSIPPANY, N.J. – U.S. Ambassador Volodymyr Zelensky suggested he won’t nec- to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch is set to essarily pursue early parliamentary elec- depart in May, in accordance with a tions after getting sworn in later this month. “three-year diplomatic assignment in His comment came following a May 7 meet- Kyiv in 2019 as planned,” a U.S. State ing with European Union Enlargement Department spokesperson stated to Commissioner Johannes Hahn in Kyiv. RFE/RL on May 6. Ambassador His press service cited Mr. Zelensky on Yovanovitch was scheduled to vacate the need for a new election law that implied the post in July. he wants to have 450 seats in the legislature “Her confirmed departure date in elected solely on open party lists. May aligned with the presidential Currently, half the legislature is filled via transition in Ukraine,” which elected a single-mandate constituencies that watch- new president in April, the spokesper- dogs and advocacy groups say leads to son said, adding, “The team at U.S. rampant vote buying and corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Public Relations in the Nation-Building of Georgia
    GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS IN THE NATION-BUILDING OF GEORGIA Maia Mateshvili A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Mass Communication in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication. Chapel Hill 2008 Approved by: Elizabeth Dougall Lucila Vargas John Reid © 2008 Maia Mateshvili ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT MAIA MATESHVILI: Government Public Relations in the Nation-Building of Georgia (Under the direction of Elizabeth Dougall, Lucila Vargas, John Reid) On May 10, 2005, President Mikheil Saakashvili delivered a public speech to commemorate President George W. Bush’s historic visit to the country of Georgia. President Bush’s visit was an indication of the U.S.’s support of pro-Western, democratic nation- building processes initiated by Saakashvili’s administration following the Rose Revolution in 2003. Within the framework of this thesis, textual analysis of President Saakashvili’s welcoming address is conducted to uncover the embedded ideology and to identify the frames developed in the speech. Subsequently, local and international print media coverage is examined through qualitative content analysis to determine how news media covered the speech. The goal of this study is to suggest how the Georgian government can facilitate the country’s democratization by using government public relations as a strategic planning tool, and by integrating public relations approaches into the communication component of the nation-building. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my heartfelt gratitude and express profound appreciation to the members of my thesis committee for their continuous guidance and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Augusto Dala Costa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at Tartu University Library MA Dissertation Toponymy and the issues of memory and identity on the post-Soviet Tbilisi cityscape Word Length: 20984 University of Glasgow International Master, School of Social and Political Sciences University of Tartu Master of Arts, Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies Ilia State University Master of Caucasian Studies, School of Arts and Sciences Augusto Dala Costa 2348460D Supervisors: Dr. Oliver Reisner (Ilia State University) & Dr. Heiko Pääbo (University of Tartu) International Master Central and Eastern European, Russian and Eurasian Studies 31st January 2020 Table of Contents Introduction 1. Memory and Commemoration on toponymy 2. Tbilisi’s Panorama 2.1. Historical Background 2.2. Contemporary developments and the national discourse 3. Research Methodology 4. Renaming policy decrees 4.1. General analysis 4.2. Districts 4.2.1. First of May/Didube district 4.2.2. Kalinin/Mtatsminda district 4.2.3. Kirov/Krtsanisi District 4.2.4. Ordzhonikidze/Vake District 4.2.5. Factory/Samgori District 4.2.6. 26 Commissars/Isani District 4.2.7. Lenin/Nadzaladevi District 4.2.8. October/Chughureti District 4.3. Stations 4.3.1. October/Nadzaladevi Station 4.3.2. Komsomol/Medical Institute Station 4.3.3. 26 Commissars/Avlabari Station 4.3.4. Lenin/Freedom Square Station 4.3.5. Polytechnical Institute/Polytechnical Station 4.4. Streets 5. Toponymy Renaming Table 5.1. General analysis 5.2. Renamings by theme 5.3. Renamings by year 5.4. Renamings by district 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The War Myths
    No part of this publication may be copied or reproduced in any form without written permission from the publisher. Authors of this work: Igor Bigun, Sergii Butko, Volodymyr Viatrovych, Kyrylo Halushko, Serhii Horobets, Sergii Gromenko, Oleksandr Zinchenko, Olesia Isaiuk, Bogdan Koro- lenko, Maksym Maiorov, Vasyl Pavlov, Rostyslav Pyliavets, Yana Prymachenko, Sergii Riabenko, Viktoria Iaremenko. Under the editorship of: Oleksandr Zinchenko, Volodymyr Viatrovych, Maksym Maiorov Ukrainian Institute of National Memory www.memory.gov.ua “LikBez. Historical Front” Center for Research on the Liberation Movement Liberation Movement Electronic Archive The cover image uses the “Remembrance Poppy” symbol created by the Ukrainian Institute of National Memory and the National Television Company of Ukraine. Symbol’s Creator: Serhij Mishakin Translation: Larysa Zariczniak, Oleg Prots Photograph’s Taken From: Branch State Archives of the Security Service of Ukraine, Central State CinePhotoPhono Archives of Ukraine named after H. Pshenychnyi, Centre for Research on the Liberation Movement Archives, German Federal Archives (bundesarchiv.de), “Istorychna Pravda” (istpravda.com.ua), Centre for Research on the Liberation Movement Electronic Archive (avr.org.ua), Wikipedia Commons (www.commons.wikimedia.org), “LikBez. Historical Front” (likbez.org.ua), waralbum.ru © Igor Bigun, Sergii Butko, Volodymyr Viatrovych, Kyrylo Halushko, Serhii Horobets, Sergii Gromenko, Oleksandr Zinchenko, Olesia Isaiuk, Bogdan Korolenko, Maksym Maiorov, Vasyl Pavlov, Rostyslav Pyliavets, Yana Prymachenko, Sergii Riabenko, Viktoria Iaremenko, Text, 2017. © Oleksandr Zinchenko, Volodymyr Viatrovych, Maksym Maiorov, Arrangement, 2017. The War Myths How are myths created? And more importantly, why are myths created? And what can be done with these myths? Is it even necessary to do something? If you are holding this book in your hands than it means you also want an answer to some of these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponymy and the Issues of Memory and Identity on The
    ІДЕОЛОГІЯ І ПОЛІТИКА ИДЕОЛОГИЯ И ПОЛИТИКА IDEOLOGY AND POLITICS © 2020 Foundation for Good Politics ISSN 2227-6068 TOPONYMY AND THE ISSUES OF MEMORY AND IDENTITY ON THE POST-SOVIET TBILISI CITYSCAPE Augusto Dala Costa1 University of Glasgow https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2020.01.00007 Abstract. The present article deals with the renaming of the toponymy of Tbilisi, Georgia, from as early as final years of Soviet rule in the country in the light of newly translated data from Georgian to English. It discusses the changes in the cityscape in relation to the national discourse that was built in the post-Soviet times, assessing how this discourse relates to the city history and the broader national context, which aspects were commemorated, and which were left out. The translated data consists of the Tbilisi City Council Decrees from both pre-Soviet and post-Soviet years and a book concerning Tbilisian toponymy and their history from the Georgian Encyclopedia tomes. With this data, an unprecedented database was produced, and from it the toponyms were cataloged accordingly. From the cataloging, the paper then describes and analyzes the toponymy replacements in-depth, mostly using qualitative methods such as discourse analysis, but hinting at some quantitative models, such as tables and comparisons between yearly renamings. The article brings a new understanding of how the national discourse is imprinted in the toponymy of the capital and its implications for the geopolitical context, also significantly contributing to the field, in the English literature, with the new data. Keywords: political toponymy, cultural memory, memory studies Introduction Studies on aspects of memory, identity, and culture can embrace a great scale of subjects, since they are part of everyone’s life, in their realities and environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Familiar Strangers: the Georgian Diaspora in the Soviet Union
    Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora in the Soviet Union By Erik Rattazzi Scott A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair Professor Stephan Astourian Professor Victoria E. Bonnell Professor Victoria Frede Professor Leslie P. Peirce Spring 2011 Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora in the Soviet Union © 2011 By Erik Rattazzi Scott Abstract Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora in the Soviet Union By Erik Rattazzi Scott Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Yuri Slezkine, Chair The experience of the Georgian diaspora in the Soviet Union is a story of the paradoxes of Soviet empire. On the one hand, the arrival of the Red Army in Tbilisi in 1921 brought Georgia’s brief period of independence to an abrupt end. On the other hand, membership in the newly-constituted Soviet Union opened up new opportunities for Georgians and other ethnic minority groups. Such opportunities were seized upon most effectively by an internal Georgian diaspora within the Soviet Union, a small but highly mobile and visible community. The Georgians, who traveled to Moscow from the periphery of the Soviet empire, could be seen at the center of Soviet life at every stage of Soviet history. Georgians headed the state that built socialism, provided the food and entertainment when Soviet citizens desired new forms of consumption and leisure, dominated the burgeoning second economy, and were among the first to seek an exit from the Soviet Union amidst the rising nationalism that accompanied its demise.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Strategies in Contemporary Georgia
    DOI 10.14746/ssp.2017.4.1 Tamar KARAIA Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Tbilisi State University (Georgia) Memory Strategies in Contemporary Georgia Abstract: Georgia, as a former Soviet republic, began dealing with its Soviet past, but in the 1990s these processes were limited and delayed. Therefore, we cannot speak about a continuous politics of memory and this led to changeable foreign policy pri- orities. After the Rose Revolution, the new government introduced reforms in most of the key spheres of institutional life. Re-addressing the totalitarian past saw a number of problematic manifestations in political and cultural life in this post-Soviet country. For the renovation of the state system, it was essential to make corresponding bounda- ries with the pre-revolution state system. Analyzing the politics of memory, symbol- ism is the most notable attitude in this period. After 2006, when Georgian citizens were deported from the Russian Federation, the tendencies of the politics of memory changed rapidly. Terms such as “occupation,” “repression” etc. appeared in the politi- cal discourse. From this period on, the strategies of memory could be associated with a politics of victimization and the formation of the collective memory prioritized as a national security issue. Key words: Georgia, collective memory, identity transformation, memory sites, lus- tration, Occupation Museum fter the collapse of the Soviet Union, the new independent states re- Afused to use the existing version of the assessment of historical facts and proposed a new, national interpretation. The consolidation of the na- tion around new ideals and the formation of new identities which would confront the Soviet one was the main challenge of this process.
    [Show full text]