Javan Surili : a Survey Population and Distribution in Mt. Slamet Central Java, Indonesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Javan Surili : a Survey Population and Distribution in Mt. Slamet Central Java, Indonesia Jurnal Primatologi Indonesia, Vol. 7 No. 2 Desember 2010, p. 51-54. ISSN 1410-5373. Pusat Studi Satwa Primata, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Javan Surili : A Survey Population and Distribution in Mt. Slamet Central Java, Indonesia [SURILI JAWA : SURVEI POPULASI DAN DISTRIBUSI DI GUNUNG SLAMET, JAWA TENGAH, INDONESIA] Arif Setiawan1, Yohannes Wibisono2, Tejo Suryo Nugroho2, Ika Yuni Agustin2, Mohamad Ali Imron1, Satyawan Pudyatmoko1, Djuwantoko1 1Wildlife Laboratory, Faculty of Forestry, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta 2Forest Resource Conservation Departement, Faculty of Forestry, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta Korespondensi: [email protected] Abstrak. Survei ini adalah penilaian yang pertama terhadap populasi dan distribusi surili jawa (Presbytis fredericae) di Gunung Slamet, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Survei telah dilakukan selama 150 hari di hutan pegunungan dan menyusuri jalur-jalur yang ada sepanjang 125,38 km. Survey ini telah mencatat 233 individu dari 54 kelompok monyet surili. Metode garis transek telah diterapkan dalam survey ini dan estimasi kerapatan surili jawa adalah 5,6 – 8,16 individu/km2, yang menempati 198.68 km2 potensial habitat. Estimasi populasi surili jawa di Gunung Slamet kurang lebih 1172 – 1621 individu. Perburuan, penebangan liar, pengumpulan kayu bakar, perburuan tanaman hias adalah ancaman yang menyebabkan degradasi habitat surili jawa di hampir semua lereng gunung. Ini adalah sub-populasi terbesar yang tersisa di jawa tengah, jadi perlindungan terhadap Gunung Slamet adalah sangat penting untuk menyelamatkan populasi monyet dan habitatnya, sebagaimana kita ketahui bahwa distribusi sub-species Presbytis di jawa tengah tidak terdapat di dalam kawasan konservasi. Peningkatan status perlindungan hutan, penegakan hukum, program kesadaran konservasi, pemberdayaan komunitas harus didukung dan diteruskan di Gunung Slamet. Abstract. This survey is the ›rst assessment of the population and distribution of the Javan surili (Presbytis fredericae) on Mt.Slamet, Central Java, Indonesia. The survey was carried out for a total of 150 days in the mountainous forest, while walking 125.38 km along existing trails. There were 233 individuals recorded, belonging to 54 groups of monkeys. The line transect method was applied during the survey and it was estimated that there were 5.6 up to 8.16 individuals/km2 density of Javan surili, occuping 198.68 km2, indicating a possible potential habitat. The population of the Javan surili on Mt.Slamet was estimated at approximately 1172 – 1621 individuals. Hunting, illegal logging, fuel wood collection, ornamental forest plants gathering were threats which were the cause of massive degradation of the Javan surili habitat across the facing slope. With its largest sub-population remaining in Central Java, protecting the Mt. Slamet is urgently needed to save this monkey population and its habitat, as it is known that there is no conservation area in the range distribution of Presbytis subspecies in Central Java. Increasing the forest protection status, law enforcement, conservation awareness programs, and community based empowerment should be supported and continued in Mt. Slamet. Key words: rekrekan, surili, Mt.Slamet, population, distribution, endangered Introduction The javan surili has so far received little attention among researchers and conservationists. Presbytis fredericae Sodi (1930) is found in the Habitat within its distribution range have been central part of Java Island. Until now, the taxonomy threatened by human habitat utilization. While some of this Presbytis is still debated. Presbytis fredericae populations of Presbytis comata in Western Java of Central Java was proposed to be a distinct have already been protected within national parks species (Brandon-Jones 1995, Brandon-Jones et and conservation areas, there are no internationally al. 2004) but another recent study suggested that all Javan surilis should be treated as a single species recognized conservation areas that would protect the (Nijman 2001). This has been followed in the latest surili‘s sub species in Central Java. Only two ›eld assessment on the IUCN Red List, where Presbytis survey and one undergraduate research had been fredericae is treated as a synonym for Presbytis conducted on this species during two last decades comata (Nijman and Richardson 2008). It has been in the central Java region, mainly in the Dieng classi›ed as endangered in the list. Here, Brandon- Mountain area (Nijman 1997a; Nijman and van Jones taxonomy’s was followed in treating javan Balen 1998; Setiawan 2003), where animal density surili (Presbytis fredericae) as distinct species, was estimated to be 28 individuals/km2, and total although it is acknowledged that this should be still population size around 700 – 800 animals. Nijman considered as tentative. (1997a) has visited Mt. Slamet, but population 52 Jurnal Primatologi Indonesia, Volume 7, Nomor 2, Desember 2010, p. 51-54 estimates for this area were not available. This is the Due to the mountainous landscapes and inaccessible ›rst population and distribution survey in Mt. Slamet forest in Mt. Slamet, we established several camps to provide baseline data for further conservation of in the forest. New trails were also undertaken, and the species in Central Java. avoiding trails which were usually used for climbing the mountain due to the high intensity of human Methods activities. There are several villages that we used as This study was carried out in Mt. Slamet, main camps during the ›eld work such as at Curug Central Java Province, Indonesia, the second Cipendog on the south-west slope, Curug Gomblang highest mountain in Java, with an average rainfall and Pancuran Pitue on the southern slope, Gunung of 5000-6174 mm/year and a temperature of 20- Tukung and Gunung Malang on the north-east 30 oC (Central Java Forestry Agency 2010). Even slope, and Gunung Suci on the north-west slope though there are no available speci›c assessments of Mt. Slamet (Figure1). The line transect method on habitat, observation on the changing habitat are was applied (NRC 1981 and Whitesides 1995) to based on vegetation composition along gradient estimate the density. The surveys were done by elevation of Mt. Slamet. Secondary species such walking slowly (1 km/hour), and stoped for several as Macaranga sp., and Trema sp. are dominates minutes to locate branch shaking and sounds of the at the elevation 800 m asl up to 1000 m asl, and monkeys. A local guide and two observers walked mountainous tree species belonging to Fagaceae together, while most of the ›eld work started at 06.00 family such as Quercus and Lithocarpus are the till 17.00, with a break at noon (12.00 till 14.00). dominant species in elevation between 1000 up to The number of individuals, age class, and distance 2500 m asl . of monkey to observer were recorded in prepared The main method for this survey was as silent worksheets. GPS was used to record points where as possible walking and waiting in the forest, mostly the monkeys were seen. The behavior of the primates on the forest trails established by local villagers. were observed ad-libitum, food items consumed by Figure 1. Study site and trails walked in Mt.Slamet Setiawan et al., Javan Surili : A survey population and distribution 53 the monkeys as food resources were recorded by (Agathis and Pinus), where food resources was not their vernacular name. Data were collected during higher than in the natural forest. This was observed each month in June 2005, August 2006, December at the old forest plantation (more than 20 years old) 2006, November 2007 and February 2008, and ›eld where food resources such as liana, and strangling surveys were done in 150 days. ›gs, were available among plantation trees. Local people around Mt. Slamet actually Results and Discussion recognized all the primates in their forest, Rekrekan A total of 125.38 km of forest trails were walked is the vernacular name for the javan surili, owa in Mt. Slamet. The survey results are presented in for javan gibbon, lutung for the javan silvered leaf Table 1 (Density estimate, efforts, group size of monkey/javan langur, and kethek for the longtailed Javan surili in four different locations in Mt. Slamet) macaque. It is recognized that these primates are separately for each of the four localition. Altitudinal protected by Indonesian law, however enforcement distribution of Presbytis fredericae in Mt. Slamet are still to be concerned. Hunting for javan surili varied between 750 m asl to 2500 m asl, the largest occurred, eventhough not speci›c to ›nd the group size were 14 individuals found at the eastern primates, and it seems to tend to opportunistic slope of Mt. Slamet, while the smallest group size hunting, where hunters who were not ›nding any were 2 animals. Correlation test on the number animals, would catch any animals, whatever they of individuals and elevation showed negative got. A case of hunting occurred during ›eld work relationship between abundance along elevation at the eastern slope of Mt. Slamet, where the javan gradient of Mt. Slamet, however these were not surili was shot and eaten for the meat. Hunting for signi›cantly different (rho : -0.162, S = 25686.50, pets was also recorded based on interview with p-value = 0.2552). villagers at the southern slope of Mt. Slamet, but Nevertheless, the taxonomic debate on the this trade can’t be found in the open market, and Javan surili in Java, information on population only an order by a buyer from the nearest city such and distribution are the most essential data for as Purwokerto. A juvenile javan surili was sold for conservation of this endangered leaf eating monkey. 250,000 IDR. Our density estimation was 5.6 individuals/km2 Habitat degradation have obviously happened at the southern slope and 8 individuals/km2 at at all slopes of Mt. Slamet. Forest plants hunters the eastern slope of Mt. Slamet. These densities by villages looking for ornamental plants such as were lower than in Mt. Dieng, 28 individuals/ orchids and pitcher plants causing a lot of forest trees km2 (Nijman and Van Balen 1998), while previous that were cut down.
Recommended publications
  • Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia
    Primate Conservation 2017 (31): 71-82 Deforestation of Primate Habitat on Sumatra and Adjacent Islands, Indonesia Jatna Supriatna1,2, Asri A. Dwiyahreni2, Nurul Winarni2, Sri Mariati3,4 and Chris Margules2,5 ¹Department of Biology, FMIPA Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 2Research Center for Climate Change, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia 3Postgraduate Program, Trisakti Institute for Tourism, Pesanggrahan, Jakarta, Indonesia 4Conservation International, Indonesia 5Centre for Tropical Environmental and Sustainability Science, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia Abstract: The severe declines in forest cover on Sumatra and adjacent islands have been well-documented but that has not slowed the rate of forest loss. Here we present recent data on deforestation rates and primate distribution patterns to argue, yet again, for action to avert potential extinctions of Sumatran primates in the near future. Maps of forest loss were constructed using GIS and satellite imagery. Maps of primate distributions were estimated from published studies, museum records and expert opinion, and the two were overlaid on one another. The extent of deforestation in the provinces of Sumatra between 2000 and 2012 varied from 3.74% (11,599.9 ha in Lampung) to 49.85% (1,844,804.3 ha in Riau), with the highest rates occurring in the provinces of Riau, Jambi, Bangka Belitung and South Sumatra. During that time six species lost 50% or more of their forest habitat: the Banded langur Presbytis femoralis lost 82%, the Black-and-white langur Presbytis bicolor lost 78%, the Black-crested Sumatran langur Presbytis melalophos and the Bangka slow loris Nycticebus bancanus both lost 62%, the Lar gibbon Hylobates lar lost 54%, and the Pale-thighed langur Presbytis siamensis lost 50%.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Alien Species -Common Name
    Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Amphibians by Common Name -3 species- (Updated December 2009) Frogs Common Name Family Genus Species Poison Dart Frog, Black-Legged Dendrobatidae Phyllobates bicolor Poison Dart Frog, Golden Dendrobatidae Phyllobates terribilis Poison Dart Frog, Kokoe Dendrobatidae Phyllobates aurotaenia Page 1 of 50 Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Birds by Common Name -3 species- (Updated December 2009) Birds Common Name Family Genus Species Cassowary, Dwarf Cassuariidae Casuarius bennetti Cassowary, Northern Cassuariidae Casuarius unappendiculatus Cassowary, Southern Cassuariidae Casuarius casuarius Page 2 of 50 Controlled Alien Species –Common Name List of Controlled Alien Species Mammals by Common Name -437 species- (Updated March 2010) Common Name Family Genus Species Artiodactyla (Even-toed Ungulates) Bovines Buffalo, African Bovidae Syncerus caffer Gaur Bovidae Bos frontalis Girrafe Giraffe Giraffidae Giraffa camelopardalis Hippopotami Hippopotamus Hippopotamidae Hippopotamus amphibious Hippopotamus, Madagascan Pygmy Hippopotamidae Hexaprotodon liberiensis Carnivora Canidae (Dog-like) Coyote, Jackals & Wolves Coyote (not native to BC) Canidae Canis latrans Dingo Canidae Canis lupus Jackal, Black-Backed Canidae Canis mesomelas Jackal, Golden Canidae Canis aureus Jackal Side-Striped Canidae Canis adustus Wolf, Gray (not native to BC) Canidae Canis lupus Wolf, Maned Canidae Chrysocyon rachyurus Wolf, Red Canidae Canis rufus Wolf, Ethiopian
    [Show full text]
  • Refuting the Validity of Golden-Crowned Langur Presbytis Johnaspinalli Nardelli 2015 (Mammalia, Primates, Cercopithecidae)
    Zoosyst. Evol. 97 (1) 2021, 141–145 | DOI 10.3897/zse.97.62235 No longer based on photographs alone: refuting the validity of golden-crowned langur Presbytis johnaspinalli Nardelli 2015 (Mammalia, Primates, Cercopithecidae) Vincent Nijman1 1 Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, School of Social Sciences and Centre for Functional Genomics, Department of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK http://zoobank.org/2C3A7C82-A9BE-4FD1-A21D-113EC28C0224 Corresponding author: Vincent Nijman ([email protected]) Academic editor: M.T.R. Hawkins ♦ Received 18 December 2020 ♦ Accepted 19 January 2021 ♦ Published 11 February 2021 Abstract Increasingly, new species are being described without there being a name-bearing type specimen. In 2015, a new species of primate was described, the golden-crowned langur Presbytis johnaspinalli Nardelli, 2015 on the basis of five photographs that were posted on the Internet in 2009. After publication, the validity of the species was questioned as it was suggested that the animals were par- tially and selectively bleached ebony langurs Trachypithecus auratus (É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1812). Since the whereabouts of the animals were unknown, it was difficult to see how this matter could be resolved and the current taxonomic status of P. johnaspinalli remains unclear. I present new information about the fate of the individual animals in the photographs and their species identifica- tion. In 2009, thirteen of the langurs on which Nardelli based his description were brought to a rescue centre where, after about three months, they regained their normal black colouration confirming the bleaching hypothesis. Eight of the langurs were released in a forest and two were monitored for two months in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Organization of Shortridge's Capped Langur (Trachypithecus
    ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH Social organization of Shortridge’s capped langur (Trachypithecus shortridgei) at the Dulongjiang Valley in Yunnan, China Ying-Chun LI1, †, Feng LIU1, †, Xiao-Yang HE2, Chi MA3, Jun SUN2, Dong-Hui LI2, Wen XIAO3, *, Liang-Wei CUI1,4, * 1 Forestry Faculty, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan 650224, China 2 Nujiang Administration Bureau, Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, Liuku, Yunnan 673100, China 3 Institute of Eastern-Himalaya Biodiversity Research, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671003, China 4 College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an, 710069, China ABSTRACT organization can be categorized into solitary, pair-living and group-living speceis (Kappeler & van Schaik 2002). Solitary Non-human primates often live in socially stable individuals typically forage alone (Boinski & Garber, 2000) and groups characterized by bonded relationships their activities are desynchronized with each other both spatially among individuals. Social organization can be used and temporally (Charles-Dominique, 1978). Except for orangutan, to evaluate living conditions and expansion potential. most solitary primate species are nocturnal (Kappeler & van Bisexual group size, ratio of males to females and Schaik, 2002). Pair-living species refer to couples of one adult group composition are essential elements male and one adult female (Kappeler, 1999), such as gibbons. determining the type of social organization. Although Most primates live in bisexual groups (van Schaik & Kappeler, the first report on Shortridge’s capped langurs 1997), which are much more stable compared with other (Trachypithecus shortridgei) was in the 1970s, until mammals, and consist of more than two adults. Group living now, the species only inhabits forests of the primates displayed a diversity with respect to the size, sex ratio Dulongjiang valley in northwest Yunnan, China, with and temporal stabitliy of compositioin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socioecology, and the Effects of Human Activity on It, of the Annamese Silvered Langur ( Trachypithecus Margarita ) in Northeastern Cambodia
    The Socioecology, and the Effects of Human Activity on It, of the Annamese Silvered Langur ( Trachypithecus margarita ) in Northeastern Cambodia Álvaro González Monge A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University School of Archaeology and Anthropology Submitted in March, 2016 Copyright by Álvaro González Monge, 2016 All Rights Reserved Statement of originality The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original and my own work, except where acknowledged. This material has not been submitted either in whole or in part, for a degree at this or other university Álvaro González Monge In memoriam: GANG HU JOAQUIM JOSEP VEÀ BARÓ Acknowledgements This project wouldn’t have successfully arrived at its conclusion without the help of an astounding amount of people. I wanted to thank many more but I think two and a half pages of this must be testing for many. I’m forever indebted to my academic supervisors, for steering me towards meaningful research and pointing out my endless flaws with endless patience, for the encouragement and heaps of valuable feedback. Whatever useful information in this thesis is largely due to them: Professor Colin Groves, for accepting me as a student which I think is one of the highest honors that can be given to a person in our field of work, and his unquenchable thirst for all mammalian bits of information I brought to his attention. Dr. Alison Behie, for her patience in greatly helping me focus on the particular topics treated in this thesis and her invaluable feedback on my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Javan Leaf Monkey (Trachypithecus Auratus) Movement in a Frag- Mented Habitat, at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, East Java, Indonesia
    Jurnal Biologi Indonesia 7(2):213-220 (2011) Javan Leaf Monkey (Trachypithecus auratus) Movement in a Frag- mented Habitat, at Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park, East Java, Indonesia M.Hari Subarkah ¹, Novianto Bambang Wawandono ², Satyawan Pudyatmoko ³, Subeno ³, Sandy Nurvianto ³, & Arif Budiman ¹ ¹ Wildlife researcher at Wildlife Laboratory Faculty of Forestry Gadjah Mada University, ² Biodiversity Conservation, Departement of Forestry ³Faculty of Forestry Gadjah Mada University. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRAK Pergerakan Lutung budeng (Trachypithecus auratus) didaerah habitat terfragmentasi Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru, Jawa Timur, Indonesia. Pergerakan lutung budeng di daerah habitat terfragmentasi diamati dengan metode transek. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa ada empat kelompok masing masing beranggotakan 12 (grup A), 16 (grup B), 15 (grup C) dan 12 lutung (grup D). Penelitian yang dilakukan disekitar hunian penduduk, jalan, hutan terdegradasi dan jalan-jalan setapak mengindikasikan bahwa lutung dalam aktivitas hariannya memerlukan waktu 32,82% diantaranya digunakan untuk makan, 30,97% untuk istirahat dan sisanya 31,79 untuk pergerakan perpindahan. Lutung dalam aktivitasnya 50,53% menggunakan wilayah puncak kanopi tumbuhan, 41,99%menggunakan kanopi tumbuhan bagian tengah dan hanya 2,49 % yang menggunakan kanopi bawah. Kata kunci: Lutung budeng (Trachypithecus auratus), habitat terfragmentasi INTRODUCTION adapt to changes in order to survive; fail- ure to adapt dooms species to extinction Most primate species live in tropical (Isabirye-Basuta & Jeremiah 2008; forests, (Mittermeier & Cheney 1987; Sharkley1996, Newsome et al. 2005). Chapman et al. 2006) where 2 major Habitat loss and fragmentation are threats are habitat destruction and hunt- associated with fewer resources, greater ing by human (Mittermeier & Cheney isolation, and more intense and far-reach- 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Trachypithecus Auratus
    ISSN 2413-0877 Volume 2 (2015) 274-277 The 3rd International Conference on Biological Science 2013 (The 3rd ICBS-2013) IDENTIFICATION OF JAVAN LANGUR (Trachypithecus auratus) IN JAVAN LANGUR CENTER (JLC) COBAN TALUN, BATU BASED ON Cytochrome-b SEQUENCE Rita Rizky Rahmawati1, Emy Kusumawati1, Lulus Putri Aninda1, Miftahul Mushlih2, Abdul Gofur1, and Dwi Listyorini1 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science State University of Malang, Jl. Semarang 5, Malang, Indonesia 65145 2 Faculty of Biology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta Email: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Javan Langur (Trachypithecus auratus) is an endemic langur in Indonesia which classified as vulnerable primate. Some researches divided Javan Langur species into some subspecies, yet was not described properly. Cytochrome-b sequence from mitochondrial DNA is able to determine samples between and intra- species as well. This study aimed to identify the Javan Langur (Trachypithecus auratus) samples named Andin (@&) and Bobby (B&), both are rehabilitated in Javan Langur Center (JLC). The amplification of Cytochrome-b gene from whole blood DNA with PCR technique using forward primer L151625’- CTTCCATGAGGACAAATATC-3’ and reverse primer Rmuc15’-GTGGAGTATAGGTATGATTGC-3’. The phylogenetic tree reconstruction based on MEGA 5 using maximum likelihood (ML) method and pairwise distance analysis with Kimura-2 parameter model resulted that Andin and Bobby are in the same group with T. a. auratus. Andin is in the same clade with T. a. auratus haplotype aaF, while Bobby in the same clade T. a. auratus and T. a. auratus haplotype aaC. We concluded that both of them belong to T.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Articles NAT
    Research articles NAT. HIST. BULL. SIAM SOC. 61(1): 7–14, 2015 PERSISTENCE OF PRIMATE AND UNGULATE COMMUNITIES ON FORESTED ISLANDS IN LAKE KENYIR IN NORTHERN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA Ding Li Yong 1,2 ABSTRACT As more rivers in Southeast Asia’s forested landscapes are dammed, artificial land-bridge islands are becoming more ubiquitous. While the mammal faunas on these islands are poorly studied, they provide unique opportunities to investigate the impacts of fragmentation and isolation on insular biota. During the course of a 60-day survey of small (<20 ha), medium (20–50 ha) and large (>50 ha) forested islands in Lake Kenyir, Peninsular Malaysia, four primates and three ungulate species were detected on these islands, while the entire complement of six primates were found at nearby mainland sites. Five ungulates were detected on mainland sites. Notably, white-thighed surili (Presbytis siamensis) and white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) were found to have persisted on islands as small as 1.1 ha two decades post-isolation, although no ungulates were observed on the three smallest (<10 ha) islands. Observed diversity patterns of primate and ungulate assemblages on forest islands may be the result of patchy, resource-influenced distributions pre-flooding, and differential abilities to disperse across the water matrix post-flooding. Further studies should resample species occurrence, on top of collecting data on abundance, demographics and genetic variability in these isolated mammalian communities. Keywords: dams, isolation, Lake Kenyir, mammals, Peninsular Malaysia, Southeast Asia INTRODUCTION Mammalian communities on tropical land-bridge islands worldwide have been little studied but are increasingly relevant in the light of understanding persistence patterns in small habitat patches as tropical forests become rapidly lost and fragmented globally (RIITTERS ET AL., 2000; GIBSON ET AL., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Lutung, Trachypithecus Barbei (Blyth, 1847)
    Contributions to Zoology, 73 (4) 271-282 (2004) SPB Academic Publishing hv, The Hague The Tenasserim Lutung, Trachypithecus barbei (Blyth, 1847) (Primates: Cercopithecidae): Description of a live specimen, and a reassessment of phylogenetic affinities, taxonomic history, and distribution ³ Thomas Geissmann Colin+P. Groves²Christian Roos ¹, 'Anthropological Institute, Universitdt Zurich-Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzer- 2 land, e-mail: [email protected]; School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian Na- 3 tional University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia, e-mail: [email protected]; Gene Bank of Pri- mates, Primate Genetics, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077 Gottingen, Germany, e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Trachypithecus barbei; taxonomy; systematics; evolution; genetics Abstract Introduction The Tenasserim lutung Trachypithecus barbei was previously The Tenasserim Lutung, Trachypithecus barbei field known from museum and observations only. specimens (Blyth, 1847) is the least known of all of Asia’s We discovered a zoo specimen and present the first confirmed primates. For instance, the only synthesis ofcolobine evidence for the continuedexistence of the species since 1967. research (Davies and Oates, 1994) mentions T. We describe the cranial pelage and colorationcharacteristics of which We first barbei once and does not infor- this species were previously unknown. present only provide any molecular evidence for recognizing T. barbei as a distinct spe- mation on the species. Likewise, Corbet and Hill cies and forassessing its phylogenetic affinities relative to other (1992) include the species as Semnopithecus incertae members of the We document the taxo- genus Trachypithecus. sedis, and Rowe (1996) does not mention it at all. based nomic history of T.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAF MONKEY, Trachypithecus Auratus Sondaicus, in the PANGANDARAN NATURE RESERVE, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA
    BEHAVIOURAL ECOLOGY OF THE SILVER LEAF MONKEY, Trachypithecus auratus sondaicus, IN THE PANGANDARAN NATURE RESERVE, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA by KAREN MARGARETHA KOOL A dissertation submitted to the University of New South Wales for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Science University of New South Wales Sydney, New South Wales Australia March, 1989 SR PT02 Form 2 RETENTION THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES DECLARATION RELATING TO DISPOSITION OF PROJECT REPORT/THESIS This is to certify that I . .1�9.-.C:eo...... MQ;.r.tQ.J:£'\hP..-. .. .J�l.... being a candidate for the degree of 1)!=>.d:o.r.--.of.-.Y.hSos.Of.hy .. am fully aware of the policy of the University relating to the retention and use of higherdegree project reports and theses, namely that the University retains the copies submitted for examination and is free to allow them to be consulted or borrowed. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1968, the University may issue a project report or thesis in whole or in part, in photostat or microfilm or other copying medium. In the light of these provisions I declare that I wish to retain my full privileges of copyright and request that neither the whole nor any portion of my project report/thesis be published by the University Librarian and that the Librarian may not authorise the publication of the whole or any part of it, and that I further declare that thispreservation of my copyright privileges shall lapse from the ... :fit.�t ............ day of ...3.o.n ....... 9..r: { ............... 19.�.<:\.................
    [Show full text]
  • The World's 25 Most Endangered Primates, 2006-2008
    Primate Conservation 2007 (22): 1 – 40 Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates, 2006 – 2008 Russell A. Mittermeier 1, Jonah Ratsimbazafy 2, Anthony B. Rylands 3, Liz Williamson 4, John F. Oates 5, David Mbora 6, Jörg U. Ganzhorn 7, Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna 8, Erwin Palacios 9, Eckhard W. Heymann 10, M. Cecília M. Kierulff 11, Long Yongcheng 12, Jatna Supriatna 13, Christian Roos 14, Sally Walker 15, and John M. Aguiar 3 1Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA 2Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust – Madagascar Programme, Antananarivo, Madagascar 3Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA 4Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK 5Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, USA 6Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA 7Institute of Zoology, Ecology and Conservation, Hamburg, Germany 8Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, México 9Conservation International Colombia, Bogotá, DC, Colombia 10Abteilung Verhaltensforschung & Ökologie, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany 11Fundação Parque Zoológico de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 12The Nature Conservancy, China Program, Kunming, Yunnan, China 13Conservation International Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia 14 Gene Bank of Primates, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany 15Zoo Outreach Organisation, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India Introduction among primatologists working in the field who had first-hand knowledge of the causes of threats to primates, both in gen- Here we report on the fourth iteration of the biennial eral and in particular with the species or communities they listing of a consensus of 25 primate species considered to study. The meeting and the review of the list of the World’s be amongst the most endangered worldwide and the most in 25 Most Endangered Primates resulted in its official endorse- need of urgent conservation measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Richness of Gunung Slamet, Central Java, and the Need for Its Protection
    Biological richness of Gunung Slamet, Central Java, and the need for its protection C HRISTIAN D EVENISH,ACHMAD R IDHA J UNAID,ANDRIANSYAH,RIA S ARYANTHI S. (BAS) VAN B ALEN,FAJAR K APRAWI,GANJAR C AHYO A PRIANTO R ICHARD C. STANLEY,OLIVER P OOLE,ANDREW O WEN N. J. COLLAR and S TUART J. MARSDEN Abstract Designating protected areas remains a core strategy we discuss different options for improving the protection in biodiversity conservation. Despite high endemism, mon- status of Gunung Slamet, including designation as a tane forests across the island of Java are under-represented National Park or Essential Ecosystem. in Indonesia’s protected area network. Here, we document Keywords Conservation planning, Garrulax rufifrons the montane biodiversity of Gunung Slamet, an isolated slamatensis, Gunung Slamet, Hylobates moloch, Indonesia, volcano in Central Java, and provide evidence to support Java, species distribution models, threatened species its increased protection. During September–December , we surveyed multiple sites for birds, primates, terrestrial Supplementary material for this article is available at mammals, reptiles, amphibians and vegetation. Survey doi.org/./S methods included transects, camera traps and targeted searches at six sites, at altitudes of –, m. We used species distribution models for birds and mammals of con- servation concern to identify priority areas for protection. Introduction We recorded bird species ( globally threatened), n the face of the current global extinction crisis mammals (five globally threatened) and reptiles and I(Bradshaw et al., ; Ceballos et al., ), it is vital amphibians (two endemic). Our species distribution models to establish protected areas that can serve as biological reser- showed considerable cross-taxon congruence between im- voirs for species and ecological processes (Chape et al., ; ’ portant areas on Slamet s upper slopes, generally above Jenkins & Joppa, ; Le Saout et al., ; Venter et al., , m.
    [Show full text]