DOCSLIB.ORG

MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting November 15, 2018 4:30 Pm – 6:00 Pm Converted to Teleconference Because of Snow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting November 15, 2018 4:30 Pm – 6:00 Pm Converted to Teleconference Because of Snow MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting November 15, 2018 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm Converted to Teleconference because of Snow. Summary minutes I. Call meeting to order (Steve CHan, CHairman): Called to order at 4:33 PM II. Introductions (Steve CHan, CHairman): III. Review of October Minutes (ChristopHer Field, Secretary): A. Some corrections to September minutes B. No corrections to October minutes. IV. Review of October performance data (KatHerine Read, MARC Assistance CHief Transportation Officer): A. Report attacHed. B. Questions: 1. WHat is a crew delay? A crew delay is recorded wHen a crew arrives late (sucH as on a train tHat arrives late) or certain improper braking operations that sHut tHe train down in a way tHat causes delay. 2. WHy are most Perryville trains are not listed? THis indicates tHey were between 95% to 100% on time. 3. Recently several trains missed a stop. WHy does this Happen? Leaves can cause trains to slip and increase stopping distance leading to missed stations. 4. THe discussion regarding OTP mentions “Fuel pump modifications on MP-36 locomotives.” WHat is tHis? MARC has identified an issue witH tHese fuel pumps and is replacing all of to increase reliability. 5. Comment from Brunswick rider. In October tHere were over 90 email messages; mostly delays due to mecHanical. 18 trains were canceled due to mecHanical issues. Was tHis an unusual montH? (THe Council Secretary notes tHat “18 trains” differs from tHe “MARC On Time Performance-Discussion” wHicH states “six trains eitHer cancelled, terminated or delayed over an hour.”) Response was tree leaves on track leads to damage to wHeels and takes trains and cars out of service. Every October and early November, see more flat spots on wHeels. 6. Brunswick line rider comment: Seen an increase an single conductor train operation; in some cases my ticket was not collected. WHy? Response was training of staff for PTC has left some trains sHort. 7. Question about fraction of pass Holders vs single ticket rides. Don’t have tHe numbers present. V. Introduction of Positive Train Control (PTC) on MARC Train Service MARC, Amtrak, Bombardier and CSX management discussion: A. ApproacHing tHe Federal deadline (1 January 2019) for all trains to operate under PTC. Will make a safe mode of transportation even safer by: 1. Enforcing speed limits. 2. Enforcing train spacing and signal adHerence. B. PCT does not: 1. Eliminate grade crossing accidents. 2. Eliminate trespasser accidents. 3. Protect in low speed, terminal areas. C. To be PTC enabled, new hardware was installed in every cab car and locomotives. EacH installation took 1 to 3 weeks. THe logistics of getting tHe equipment to and from tHe sHop was a major effort. DJ commended tHe crews for tHe logistical effort. D. CSX Effort to install IETMS system: 1. $2.3 Billion investment system wide. 2. Wayside hardware installed along 10,000 miles of track. 3. Crews were trained on equipment. E. Bombardier training: 1. Classroom training for engineers and conductors. 2. Practice initializing and using tHe system at a stationary unit in tHe yard. 3. Now training in operation. F. Amtrak effort to install and implement IETMS and ACSES: 1. RigHt of way hardware installed. 2. Classroom training of train crews. G. WHile tHere will likely be some cHallenges, tHe passenger sHould notice only minor issues: 1. Some run times may increase. 2. Minor scHedule cHanges to increase turning times because of extra steps required to initialize tHe system at tHe start of eacH run. Fortunately, initialization time has not been as long as expected. But tHere will be minor scHedule changes to increase turning times. 3. WHen trains are late, tHe longer system initialization time may reduce tHe ability to quickly turn and attempt to get back on scHedule. 4. After about a montH of experience in revenue service, will have a mucH better idea of tHe actual impact. 5. Implementation will be before 1 January, but I it may start before. H. Questions: 1. Can non-PCT enabled equipment operate on a PTC line and will any equipment be out of service on 1 January? Once tHe line is PTC, only PTC capable equipment may be operated on tHe line. Fortunately, MARC expects enougH of its equipment to be so enabled tHat tHere will be no equipment sHortage. VI. Update on November 12 Penn Line scHedule cHange and Amtrak trackwork (David JoHnson (DJ), MARC CHief Transportation Officer and Howard Carter, Rail Operations Manager, Amtrak Commuter Services): A. ScHedule cHange Monday. Train 511 Has issues. Working witH Amtrak and expect improvement next week. B. THe weekend service can now be described in a single grid. C. THe new printed scHedule now features a panel describing tHe bus service between Perryville and Newark Delaware/SEPTA to PHiladelpHia. D. MARC and Amtrak personnel met witH tHose operating bus connection to MARC. Discussed scHedule cHanges, impact of late trains, and built a sense of being one integrated transportation system. E. During tHe meeting, Amtrak announced tHat tHe work on Track 2 (tHe middle track) was completed one day early. F. Questions: 1. On tHe weekend scHedule wHat is tHe meaning of tHe orange and black “SAT/SUN*”? THe service operates at tHose stations only on tHe specified days. For example train 481/681 originates from Penn Station but originates from Saturday Martin Airport on Sunday. VII. Update on MDOT MTA CHarmPass and SmatBenefits roll-out (KatHerine Read, MARC Assistant CHief Transportation Officer): A. Still working on tHe smart benefits integration to be finisHed by end of tHe year. B. Since start up, tHere have been 13,468 ticket purcHases tHrougH tHe app witH total revenue of $151,606. PurcHases by MARC passengers make up 48% of all revenue. MTA is pleased witH tHe CHarmPass acceptance. C. Crews report liking tHe service, finding ticket taking very easy. THe app came to the rescue recently wHen tHere was a major network outage tHat prevented purcHased tHrougH tHe station macHines. RatHer tHan needing to collect many casH tickets and disputing on board purcHasing fees, crews encouraged passengers to get and use tHe app. D. No questions: VIII. Old Business: A. HaletHorpe soutHbound elevator button ligHt not fixed. B. Is tHe GPS RealTime Feed update on track for end of tHe year? THe tracking is on track to be operational by tHe end of tHe year. Don’t know wHen tHe public API interface will be available. C. Is full size bike service on track for tHe end of tHe year? Yes. (THe new scHedules say so.) 18 of 35 MARC III cars have bike racks. About 3 to 5 cars are done a week. Bike service will be in place by tHe end of tHe year. IX. New Business: A. DJ brougHt our attention to two fliers at tHe back of packet witH scHedule adjustments for THanksgiving and Christmas and New Year’s. Of special note, Amtrak Train 151 not going to operate Tuesday or Wednesday before THanksgiving. Also, Amtrak 136/196 (3:05 departure from Union) will not stop at Aberdeen. B. Toys for Tots drive 5 and 6 December at Union Station. Unwrapped, new toys, casH, or cHecks made out to “United States Marie Toys for Tots”. C. Council member commented tHat bencH missing at Seabrook was replaced yesterday. D. Council member commented tHat on train 430 on tHe crew responded well witH a higH level of professionalism and calm to an unruly passenger in tHe quiet car. E. Recently Brunswick Line train 890 was delayed. Some passenger grumbly tHat need to pay to ride Metro. One passenger asked if conductors could hand out passes to Metro. AnotHer wondered if tHey could get a discount on tHe next montHly pass. WHile botH seem difficult to implement, MARC staff will consider tHe latter. F. Council member expressed concern about lack of grounds keeping at Perryville. Low vines are out of control in a grassy patcH and are covered by leaves. Two people have fallen wHile walking across tHe “grass”. Will cHeck it out. G. Council member expressed concern tHat during tHe construction of a new Camden Station, tHere is no sHelter for tHose waiting for a train arrival. MTA expressed sympatHy, but said tHere is little tHat can be done. But tHey would consider options. THe good news is tHe new station will be twice as large as tHe previous one. X. Meeting adjourned at 5:51 PM Upcoming meetings (THird THursday of eacH montH 4:30 to 6:00) January 17, 2019 In person February 21 , 2019 Teleconference MarcH 21, 2019 In person Reminder: E-mail rail car or station defects to KatHerine Read – [email protected] Attendance: An “X” means present in tHe room. A “P” means present by pHone. A “L” means late. MRAC Amtrak CSX Atif Adam Andreas Wilson Joe Lisska Brian Love P Howard Carter P Marco Tura P Carrie BlougH P Mike Tierney P Matt Gross P Charles Enders P Justin Waldron P Nancy Roberts P Cheryl Harris P Shaquana StepHens ChristopHer Field P TC Williamson Jr. P MTA Corrine Lopez Andrea Farmer P Dan SutHerland Weiser Bombardier David JoHnson P J.C. Hendrickson P Amika Anderson Dean Del PescHio P Joe Conny P Bill Egan P JosH Wolf J.P. Carnes-Stine P ChristopHer Bostic KatHerine Read P JudaH Prero Debbie Foster-TomascHefsky Kyle NembHard June Brandt P Jeff Gaffney Matt Mitchell KatHerine Hodges P JosH McCormack Paul Krysowaty Katina DasHiell P Lee Woodward Thomasina Swilling Kelly Kopeikin MattHew Sturgeon P Tom Mackay LaToya R. Griffin Sean McCarty Steve CHan P Debbie Foster (for Amika) Kyle NembHard P Guests JoHn Morris Neil Coolen, (Rider) Vince Hogeg (Brunsk LA) MARC Train Service On-Time Performance October 2018 Same Month Month Year to Date 2017 Brunswick Line Brunswick 96.35% 94.37% 96.95%
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting June 20, 2019 4:30Pm‐6:00Pm
    MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting June 20, 2019 4:30pm‐6:00pm Phone: 1‐888‐407‐4198 Code: 77713445# **PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOUR PHONE IS ON MUTE WHEN YOU ARE NOT SPEAKING** I. Call meeting to order Steve Chan, Chair II. Introductions III. Review of May minutes Brian Love, Acting RAC Secretary for May meeting IV. Review of May performance data Katherine Read, MARC Assistant Chief Transportation Officer V. MARC Train preparation for summer high heat/weather David Johnson (DJ), MARC Chief Transportation Officer Amtrak and Bombardier Management VI. August 5 Penn Line schedule change and 2019 Penn Line Amtrak trackwork update DJ and Amtrak Commuter Operations management VII. Old Business VIII. New Business, including questions and comments from guests Upcoming meetings (all Thursdays, 4:30‐6:00pm) July 18, 2019 (in person) August 15, 2019 (teleconference) September 19, 2019 (in person) Reminder: E‐mail rail car or station defects to Katherine Read – [email protected] MARC Train Service On-Time Performance May 2019 Same Month Month Year to Date 2018 Brunswick Line Brunswick 94.16% 96.26% 85.95% Frederick 90.15% 95.00% 87.50% West Virginia 89.39% 93.88% 81.82% Total Brunswick 91.27% 95.06% 85.08% Camden Line Camden 77.06% 87.79% 88.29% BTS OTP 83.66% 91.15% 86.88% Penn Line Baltimore 91.36% 91.76% 84.33% Perryville 86.47% 83.36% 85.09% Amtrak OTP 89.81% 89.08% 84.57% MARC SYSTEM TOTAL OTP 87.44% 89.87% 85.43% MARC On Time Performance Summary May 2019 Penn Line Weekday 89.23% Month 88.46% Year to Date 91.29% AM Southbound (Trains 401‐423)
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Train Service On-Time Performance November 2018
    MARC Train Service On-Time Performance November 2018 Same Month Month Year to Date 2017 Brunswick Line Brunswick 85.00% 93.56% 95.76% Frederick 89.66% 93.37% 94.83% West Virginia 89.74% 92.22% 92.31% Total Brunswick 88.10% 93.05% 94.30% Camden Line Camden 91.63% 90.48% 97.54% BTS OTP 89.99% 91.67% 96.04% Penn Line Baltimore 86.81% 83.93% 90.01% Perryville 81.62% 84.40% 85.09% Amtrak OTP 85.12% 84.08% 88.41% MARC SYSTEM TOTAL OTP 86.95% 86.97% 91.27% MARC On Time Performance Summary November 2018 Penn Line Weekday 84.26% Month 83.22% Year to Date 90.34% AM Southbound (Trains 401‐423) 83.20% PM Northbound (Trains 426‐448) 80.23% AM Northbound (Trains 400‐412) 80.85% PM Southbound (Trains 537‐449) Trains below 89% (late more than twice, red‐bold lower than 79%): 400 (73% month, 91% YTD) 453 (84% month, 72% YTD) 404 (74% month, 85% YTD) 511 (66% month, 82% YTD) 412 (63% month, 65% YTD) 517 (81% month, 79% YTD) 414 (79% month, 89% YTD) 520 (81% month, 89% YTD) 424 (71% month, 76% YTD) 525 (66% month, 79% YTD) 426 (81% month, 85% YTD) 532 (81% month, 80% YTD) 430 (79% month, 83% YTD) 536 (85% month, 82% YTD) 431 (85% month, 86% YTD) 537 (76% month, 81% YTD) 433 (63% month, 79% YTD) 544 (85% month, 75% YTD) 438 (84% month, 87% YTD) 579 (68% month, 71% YTD) 439 (84% month, 87% YTD) 610 (47% month, 88% YTD) 446 (68% month, 85% YTD) 634 (76% month, 74% YTD) 447 (68% month, 63% YTD) 641 (86% month, 85% YTD) 448 (85% month, 88% YTD) 642 (81% month, 85% YTD) 449 (71% month, 77% YTD) 100% for month: 407, 409, 451 Penn Line Weekend 93.33% Month 92.32%
    [Show full text]
  • Mcfrs Community Risk Analysis and Standards of Cover
    MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER Fire Station 20 Battalion 2 Bethesda Station 9041 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda Description – Ownership: Volunteer – Employees: 3 Shift Work – Apparatus Housed: Engine – Specialty Team: Hazmat – First Due Area: 4.05 mi2 – Volunteers: totaled in with the sister company Fire Station 6 Overview Bethesda, Station 20, is surrounded by important institutions, not only for their medical breakthroughs and clandestine facilities but for the employment opportunities given to the area. The businesses and institutions bring a large number of people into Station 20’s first due area during rush hour but also the two federal hospitals and research facilities bring people from all over the world. Scattered around the different facilities are quiet residential communities that have been settled for the most part since WWII. Because it is a hazmat house, two certified hazmat technicians must comprise at least two of the three-person staffing on the engine. The engine responds to hazmat incidents for additional staffing for the Hazmat Team, and Station 20 personnel certify annually by completing NFPA 472 competencies which is completed as a monthly drill . Station 20 also houses the scheduling office for the operations of Montgomery County Fire Rescue. 218 MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER High Risk Areas – Including Hazards Station 20 has METRO tracks through their first due area and it services two METRO stations: Grosvenor and Medical Center – just miles apart. The Grosvenor station serves a heavily-populated residential area and the Medical Center station services two large federal properties: NIH and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • R-5Ha Cslal4jajai€? a I.` ` I.\Eb Revieweffice of Preservation Services 1 1 LOD]T,E€
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes DETERMINATION 0F ELIGIBILITY FORM Property Name: Gaithersburg wye/The wood Lot Inventory Number: M: 21-166 Address: North comer ofs. Frederick Avenue and Fulks corner Avenue Historicdistrict: _yes X no City : Gaithersb urg Zipcode: 20877 County : Montgomery USGS Quadrangle(s): Gaithersburg Property owner: City ofGaithersburg Tax Account ID Number: 09-00817800 Tax Map parcel Number(s): Multiple TaxMapNumber: FT561 Project: MD 355 Bus Rapid Transit Improvements project Agency: Montgomery county Dept. of Transportation Agency prepared By: VIIB Preparer's Name: George Rounds Date prepared : 7/31 /2018 Documentation is presented in: Maryland Inventory of Historic places (MIHP) Forin Preparer's Eligibility Recommendation: Eligibility recommended X Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A 8 C D Considerations: A 8 C D E F G Complete if the property is a contributing or non-contributing resource to a NR district/property.. Name of the District/Property: Inventory Number: Eligible: yes Listed: yes Site visit byMHT staff yes X no Name: Date: Description of property and Justification: rp/eczse c!ffczc7z mc7p cr#dpfoo/o/ Introduction/Location: Gaithersburg Wye/The Wood Lot (Gaithersburg Wye) is a rail spur located between the Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (8&0) to the noilh, Fulks Comer Avenue to the southeast, and S. Frederick Avenue (also known as MD 355) to the west in Gaithersburg, Montgomery County, Maryland. Originally constructed in 1888 and expanded in 1906, the wye provided locomotives with the capability to turn around in Gaithersburg, resulting in the city's emergence as an important point of origin and terminus along the rail line and contributed directly to the city's commercial and residential growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33, Number 2 Second Quarter 2011
    ISSN 1053-4415 A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY $8.00 VOLUME 33, NUMBER 2 SECOND QUARTER 2011 Letter from the Editor When I was fewer than a dozen years Lincoln, the raids by “Stonewall” Jackson, old, the centennial of the Civil War was cel- the massive transport of Union troops The official publication of THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO ebrated. It became a centerpiece of life, in southward, the defense of the railroad and RAILROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY school and in the newspapers, along with the attacks launched against it. P. O. Box 24225 dozens of events to commemorate 100 Indeed, one worthy task—volunteers, Baltimore, Maryland 21227-0725 e-mail: [email protected] years after this and that battle or happen- please!—is to compile a timetable of website: www.borhs.org ing. It actually began with the centennial these wartime events so that they can be Missing Sentinel: [email protected] of the Harpers Ferry raid, which, of course, properly commemorated as their anni- The Baltimore and Ohio Historical Society is a involved the B&O as a central factor. versaries roll around. A bibliography of non-profit corporation dedicated to preserving and disseminating historical information about At precisely the same time, I began my the B&O story during the Civil War is The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. lifelong fascination with model railroading also a good and easy project for someone Copyright ©2011 ISSN 1053-4415 and railroad history. So there it all is: today so inclined. SOCIETY OFFICERS I’m a B&O modeler, an amateur railroad There should be photo exhibitions Bob Hubler, President Bob Weston, VP Operations historian, a Civil War re-enactor, and the and research material published on the George Stant, VP Finance owner of a Civil War-era B&O layout.
    [Show full text]
  • Pa R K & R Id E
    800.745.RIDE commuterconnections.org !"a$!"a$ 800.745.RIDE !"a$ ImIm!"a$Im A} !"a$!"a$ !"`$ ?Ï!"a$ !"a$ !"a$ !"a$!"a$ !"a$Im Im!"a$Im!"a$ !"a$Im !"a$Im )" !"a$ FINKSBURG 14 6 A| !(6 Iq (!10 !"a$!"a$Im !"b$ CASCADE Im HYDES EMMITSBURG HUNT VALLEY A¡ !"a$ MAUGANSVILLE GLYNDON Im !"a$ !"a$)"5 W A S H I N G T O N !(23 !"a$Im18 !"a$ImIm!"a$!"a$Im ?ç Iu I¥ (!7 ImIm !"a$Im FORK Ix CLEAR SPRING ?è Aø Im 4 !( !(14 Io RISING SUN REISTERSTOWN AÇ ?þ !"c$ BIG POOL Iy SMITHSBURG LITTLE ORLEANS BERKELEY SPRINGS ?ë TANEYTOWN !(5 ?Ë CONOWINGO COLORA ?Î B A L T I M O R E 17 KINGSVILLE GREAT CACAPON ?¾ !"a$ ?ï ?ó LUTHERVILLE TIMONIUM (! Iq ?Ó THURMONT C A R R O L L !(24 DARLINGTON GLEN ARM JOPPA !(2 1 8 ROCKY RIDGE ?Í (! 15 (!8 ")!( KEYMAR !(3 JARRETTSVILLE !(10 !(4 OWINGS MILLS ?¾ !(7 Iu A{ ?Ï AÓ !"d$ 5 STEVENSON 25 M O R G A N ?Ë PORT DEPOSIT ELKTON (!3 (! ?¾ !(9 Io Aw NORTH EAST "5 AÃ Ig ?ï WESTMINSTER Ay !(1 TOWSON ) HEDGESVILLE 4 PAW PAW FALLING WATERS ?Å UNION BRIDGE ?ù (!2 (! !"d$ MONKTON !"d$ Iy ?¿ ?Ó 9 ?Î UPPERCO ") %&l( 7 !( CHARLESTOWN WHITE MARSH Ix !"e$ FAIRPLAY !"a$ %&l( Io CHURCHVILLE ?ñ !"c$ ")12 ")2 NEW WINDSOR C E C I L PIKESVILLE PARKVILLE LEVELS ")8 (!7 13 (!27 AÇ SPARKS GLENCOE !(4 RANDALLSTOWN (!2 6 NOTTINGHAM • SYKESVILLE !(3 1 Highways/Major Roads Highways/Major 11 H A R F O R D !( CHESAPEAKE CITY WOODBINE (! (!1 !(1 Iu B A L T I M O R E ")3 Iy KEEDYSVILLE ")9 ?Ï A} 10 13 MARRIOTTSVILLE (!2 ?Ò FINKSBURG !"d$ ") (! ROSEDALE !(15 LIBERTYTOWN !(10 14 ")6 • 3 !"c$ (! HOV/Express Lanes Access Lanes HOV/Express )"5 ")1 A¡ HYDES LISBON )"21 B E R K E L E Y F R E D E R I C K 15 4 ?Ð SHARPSBURG 5 ") WINDSOR MILL (! ?Õ !(2 !(7 18 ") ?Ì COOKSVILLE 19 MIDDLE RIVER FORK GWYNN OAK Baltimore (! MIDDLETOWN • ?Û ROHRERSVILLE 4 WOODSTOCK Free vs.
    [Show full text]
  • I-270 Monorail Feasibility Study
    I-270 MONORAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FEBRUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters Tables Executive Summary ................................................................................1 ES.1 Design Criteria ................................................................................2 Chapter 1 Introduction ..........................................................................9 ES.2 Potential Environmental Resource Impacts .....................................4 Chapter 2 Analysis ..............................................................................15 ES.3 Total Project Costs ..........................................................................5 Chapter 3 Impacts and Costs ...............................................................53 ES.4 Total Routine Operating Costs ........................................................5 Chapter 4 Findings ...............................................................................63 ES.5 Projected Changes in Daily Boardings for Major Transit Routes .....6 References ES.6 Projected Changes in Daily Trips Between Build and No Build........7 Appendices 2.1 Design Capacity – Number of Passengers ......................................20 2.2 I-270 Feasibility Study Monorail Design Criteria ............................22 Figures 2.3 Standard Station Dimensions .........................................................30 ES.1 Feasibility Study Monorail Alignment .............................................3 2.4 Metrorail Montgomery County Station Analysis .............................32
    [Show full text]
  • Mcfrs Community Risk Analysis and Standards of Cover
    MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER Fire Station 1 Battalion 1 Silver Spring Station 8110 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring Description – Ownership: County – Employees: 10 Shift Work – Apparatus Housed: Engine, Truck, Ambulance, Medic – First Due Area: 2.08 mi2 – Active LOSAP Volunteers: 36 – IECS Volunteers: 22 Overview Silver Spring Station 1 is located between Georgia Avenue (MD97) and the METRO/CSX train tracks in their back yard. Georgia Avenue itself is a major six lane highway that runs from Washington D.C. to Howard County, a county bordering Montgomery County to the northeast. Silver Spring itself “serves as the primary urban area in Montgomery County”4and has been revitalized in recent years with new national retail chains, theaters, and restaurants as well as many family-owned restaurants with their own ethnic diversity. In 2003, Discovery Communications (Discover Channel) built their new headquarters on the corner of Georgia Avenue and Colesville Road. It is a huge, state- of-the-art facility that employees over 1,000 people. 106 MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER High Risk Areas – Including Hazards Silver Spring has both the METRO and CSX railroad running through the downtown area which is served by Fire Station 1. The railroad right-of-way is used by CSX, Amtrak, and MARC trains. The Silver Spring METRO station is an above ground station. METRO services many professionals, visitors and students. In November 2010, the Silver Spring METRO Station had 12,602 pedestrians entering the METRO and 12,185 pedestrians exiting the METRO during the weekdays alone. For weekends during November 2010, 10,775 pedestrians entered the METRO at the Silver Spring Station and 10,620 exited.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting Trends for Primary Jobs During 2014
    Commuting Trends For Primary Jobs During 2014 Published April 2018 City of Gaithersburg Planning and Code Administration 31 South Summit Avenue Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 Telephone: (301) 258-6330 [email protected] www.gaithersburgmd.gov City Officials Mayor Jud Ashman City Council Neil Harris Laurie-Anne Sayles Micheal A. Sesma Ryan Spiegel Robert T. Wu Planning Commission Chair John Bauer Vice Chair Lloyd S. Kaufman Commissioner Matthew Hopkins Commissioner Danny Winborne Alternate Commissioner Philip Wessell Responsible Staff Raymond Robinson III, Long Range Planning Manager Gregory Mann, Planner II Alyssa Roff, Transportation Planner Commuting Trends for Primary Jobs During 2014 City of Gaithersburg, Maryland Table of Contents Part 1: Report Purpose and Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………2 Methodology Overview ………………………………………………………………………………...4 Montgomery County Subdivisions and Census Tracts………………………………………..………...7 Mode of Commute Analysis ………………………………………………………………………...….9 Comparison to 2011-2012 report ………………………………………………………………………17 Study Area: City of Gaithersburg ……………………………………………………………………...18 Study Area: East of I-270 ……………………………………………………………………………...36 Study Area: West of I-270 ……………………………………………………………………………..53 Study Area: Census Tracts ……………………………………………………………………………..69 Comparison to 2011-2012 Census Data ………………………………………………………….…….95 Part 2:Appendix A. American Community Survey (ACS) 2014 B. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Data City of Gaithersburg Data East of I-270 Data West of I-270 Data
    [Show full text]
  • Iv. Central County Central County 183
    182 PLACES FROM THE PAST IV. CENTRAL COUNTY CENTRAL COUNTY 183 IV. CENTRAL COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSES HISTORIC DISTRICT (1776+) NR Vicinity of Washington Street and Courthouse Square, City of Rockville Municipality Rockville has been the county seat since Montgomery County was estab- lished in 1776. Citizens selected Rockville for its central location along an established road and for its well-established taverns to accommodate those with court business. Originally known as Montgomery Court House, the town was called Rockville by the early 1800s. Throughout the years much of Rockville’s activity has centered on the Courthouse. The Red Brick Courthouse was built in 1891, for $50,000. It is the third courthouse on the site, replacing the original courthouse of 1779, and another built in 1840. Designed by Baltimore architect Frank E. Davis, the Courthouse is built of hand-pressed brick accented with native Seneca Sandstone. The building was one of the last load-bearing , M-NCPPC, 1975 masonry structures in the county and is the finest example of Romanesque Revival architecture in the county. Most attorneys maintained offices Michael Dwyer around the Courthouse Square. The historic district includes the 100 Red Brick Courthouse (1891) block of South Washington Street, including the Gothic Revival Christ Episcopal Church, designed by Frank Davis and built 1884-7. Frame resi- dences on this block, built between 1884 and 1903, reflect Queen Anne and Colonial Revival styles popular in this era. After World War I, increasing county population led to the need for a larger courthouse. The State Legislature approved the acquisition of a Grey Courthouse (1931) block of land, to raze the existing buildings, and construct a new Courthouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix : Historic Preservation Program
    Appendix : Historic Preservation Program Objective The intent of the County’s preservation program is to provide a rational system for evaluating, protecting, and enhancing the County’s historic and architectural heritage for the benefit of present and future generations. Historic sites and districts are essential elements of community identity and the unique character of the County and its communities. The Master Plan for Historic Preservation and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Chapter DA of the Montgomery County Code, are designed to protect and preserve Montgomery County’s historic and architectural heritage. Placement on the Master Plan officially designates a property as a historic site or historic district and subjects it to the procedural requirements of the Ordinance. Any substantial changes to the exterior of a resource or its environmental setting must be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and a historic area work permit issued under the provisions of the Ordinance, Section BDA-F. In accordance with the Master Plan for Historic Preservation and unless otherwise specified in the amendment, the environmental setting for each site, as defined in Section DA- of the Ordinance, is the entire parcel on which the resource is located as of the date it is designated on the Master Plan. Historic Sites in Gaithersburg West The Gaithersburg West Master Plan includes historic sites that were designated in the IHE Gaithersburg Vicinity Master Plan (Belward Farm, St. Rose of Lima) and the I Germantown Master Plan (Clopper Mill Ruins). Immediately bordering the area are Maple Spring Barns and Pleasant View Church, designated in the @@B Potomac Subregion Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Trust Nr-Eligibility Review Form
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM Property Name: Metropolitan Branch, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Inventory Number: Address: Extending through Montgomery County, from Takoma Park NW to Dickerson Owner: CSX Transportation, Inc. Tax Parcel Number: Multiple (See Survey Form M:0-2) Tax Map Number: I-495/I-95 Capital Beltway Corridor Transportation Project: Improvement Study Agency: State Highway Administration Site visit by: Staff: D No D Yes Name: Eligibility recommended: _X_____________ Eligibility not recommended: Criteria: i:gi A D B D C D D. Considerations: DA OB De OD OE OF OG D None Is property located within a historic district? i:giNo 0Yes Name ofDistrict: Is district listed? 0No 0Yes I-495/I-95 Capital Beltway Corridor Transportation Improvement Study Documentation on the property/district is presented in: Historic Resources Suvey and Determination of Eligibilitv Report Description of Property and Eligibility Determination: (Use continuation sheet ifnecessary and attach map and photo): The Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was previously surveyed by William E. Hutchinson and Carlos Avery of Sugarloaf Regional Trails in 1979. The rail line has not been altered since the prior,survey. The Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A and C for its association with the transportation industry, as well as the agricultural and residential development of Montgomery County. The development of the railroad provided a needed stimulus to the stagnant economy of Montgomery County in the late nineteenth century. The railroad revived the agricultural economy of Montgomery County by allowing farmers to quickly ship perishable goods to market such as dairy products and produce.
    [Show full text]