R-5Ha Cslal4jajai€? a I.` ` I.\Eb Revieweffice of Preservation Services 1 1 LOD]T,E€

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

R-5Ha Cslal4jajai€? a I.` ` I.\Eb Revieweffice of Preservation Services 1 1 LOD]T,E€ MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR Eligible: yes DETERMINATION 0F ELIGIBILITY FORM Property Name: Gaithersburg wye/The wood Lot Inventory Number: M: 21-166 Address: North comer ofs. Frederick Avenue and Fulks corner Avenue Historicdistrict: _yes X no City : Gaithersb urg Zipcode: 20877 County : Montgomery USGS Quadrangle(s): Gaithersburg Property owner: City ofGaithersburg Tax Account ID Number: 09-00817800 Tax Map parcel Number(s): Multiple TaxMapNumber: FT561 Project: MD 355 Bus Rapid Transit Improvements project Agency: Montgomery county Dept. of Transportation Agency prepared By: VIIB Preparer's Name: George Rounds Date prepared : 7/31 /2018 Documentation is presented in: Maryland Inventory of Historic places (MIHP) Forin Preparer's Eligibility Recommendation: Eligibility recommended X Eligibility not recommended Criteria: A 8 C D Considerations: A 8 C D E F G Complete if the property is a contributing or non-contributing resource to a NR district/property.. Name of the District/Property: Inventory Number: Eligible: yes Listed: yes Site visit byMHT staff yes X no Name: Date: Description of property and Justification: rp/eczse c!ffczc7z mc7p cr#dpfoo/o/ Introduction/Location: Gaithersburg Wye/The Wood Lot (Gaithersburg Wye) is a rail spur located between the Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (8&0) to the noilh, Fulks Comer Avenue to the southeast, and S. Frederick Avenue (also known as MD 355) to the west in Gaithersburg, Montgomery County, Maryland. Originally constructed in 1888 and expanded in 1906, the wye provided locomotives with the capability to turn around in Gaithersburg, resulting in the city's emergence as an important point of origin and terminus along the rail line and contributed directly to the city's commercial and residential growth. The resource is set back from the right-of-way of S. Frederick Avenue which includes a concrete sidewalk, metal guardrail, and grassed slope. Although no formal entry to the wye is present, a paved parking area accessible from Olde Town Avenue and a concrete sidewalk located along Fulks Comer Avenue provide pedestrian access. The remaining portion of the wye is situated on a small grassed lot in a suburban setting featuring a small industrial building on an adjacent lot as well as single and mufti-family residential development and several buildings which have been converted to commercial use. MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended ELigibinty not recommended ^ Criteria : - A 8 C - D Considerations: A 8 C D E F G MHT Comments: r-5ha cslal4jAjAI€? a I.` ` I.\eB Revieweffice of preservation services 1 1 LOD]t,e€ Review.er, National Register Pr:aTgram I Da'te 3otgoqLfo+ NR-ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM M: 21-166 Gaithersburg Wve/The Wood Lot Architectural Description: As constructed, the wye sat on a single 1 -acre parcel and consisted of two spurs connected with the south side of the double- tracked line, enabling locomotives to turn around at Gaithersburg (Montgomery County Deed Book [MCDB] EBP31 :435). Two additional parcels were acquired for the wye's improvement during the 20th century, which included the enlargement of the radii of the tracks (MCDB JLB 184:451 ). Currently, only a portion of the enlarged facility is evident, including approximately 50 feet of rails and a steel freight buffer stamped, "Freight Bumping Post, The Buda Co. Chicago,Ill, Pat'd Oct 1906." The remainder of the rails, graded road bed, and other materials have been removed and/or covered by an asphalt parking area and modem residential development, which has been constructed along the site where the wye once connected with the Metropolitan Branch of the 8&0. Additionally, due to subdivision of the property in 2012, the remaining features sit on a separate detached parcel and are obscured from view by a large residential development. Historic Context Gaithersburg Wye traces its origins to shortly after the completion of the 8&0 Railroad mainline, which ran between Baltimore, Maryland and Wheeling, West Virginia. In 1853, the Metropolitan Railroad Company was formed to construct a branch line running between Georgetown and Point of Rocks, Maryland. The onset of the Civil War and the expiration of the company charter led to the demise of the company, which had completed the survey and planning of the route. Shortly thereafter, the 8&0 assumed control and began construction, completing the Metropolitan Branch at Gaithersburg on February 8,1873 (Soderburg 2009). At the time, Gaithersburg was a small agricultural settlement comprising a few clusters of homes and businesses located along the road now known as Frederick Avenue, historically known as "The Great Road West," connecting the District of columbia and lands west to the Allegheny Mountains. With the arrival of the 8&0, the small settlement developed into a railroad-centered commercial node as farmers and merchants could ship and receive produce and goods to distant areas (Beck 1994: 286). Agricultural diversification also occuiTed as perishable items such as dairy products and fruit could now be transported more efficiently (Soderburg 2009). In the decades following the Civil War, railroads increasingly improved the efficiency of commercial and agricultural operations, and lands surrounding cities became accessible not only to summer residents seeking to escape the heat of washington, D.C., but also to permanent residents seeking "the pleasures as well as the advantages of a home in the country" (Kelly 2011 : 36, 40). Real estate brokers and land developers began designing planned residential neighborhoods in Gaithersburg and other towns outside of Washington, D.C. According to a Washington Post article, "The development along the Metropolitan Branch within the past few years has been phenomenal. Nearly all the land between here [Rockville] and Gaithersburg has been bought up either by syndicates or wealthy individuals, and quite a number of the newly acquired properties have been platted for sale in building lots" (Washington Post via Beck 1994: 285). In 1878, the town was incorporated and, according to the 1879 History of Montgomery County Maryland, the town possessed a town hall, public school, and a population of 200 persons, including farmers, blacksmiths, merchants, a physician, a shoemaker, and two churches (Boyd 1879: 129). Soon, the Metropolitan Branch was more utilized than the original 8&0 mainline. First, the existing tunnels along the main line could not be widened for increasingly larger engines and freight (Soderburg 2009). According to the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT) State Historic Sites Inventory Form for the Gaithersburg Wye, "the local economic and community growth created by the line resulted in vastly increased demand for local agricultural and passenger commuter services," which in turn resulted in the existing single-track line exceeding its capability. Secondly, the expansion of the line's capacity resulted in the double tracking of the Metropolitan Branch between Washington D.C. and Gaithersburg, which had begun in 1886 and was completed in 1893 (Christensen and Hott 1986: 3). MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST REVIEW E]igibi]ity recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria : A 8 C D Considerations: A 8 C D E F G MHT Comments: Reviewer, Office of preservation services Date Reviewer, National Register program Date NR-ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM M: 21-166 Gaithersburg Wve/The Wood Lot Concurrent with the double-tracking of the Metropolitan Branch, Gaithersburg emerged as the terminal site for local rail service, likely due to its status as a hub of local commerce linked via a network of market roads, as well as the residential suburbanization occurring in the area, which created demand for passenger service. On July 5,1888, the 8&0 purchased I acre for $300 from Ignatius Fulks for the construction of a "wye" that enabled locomotives to be tuned around and facilitate Gaithersburg as a terminal point and origin (MCDB EBP31 :435). Two years prior, Fulks had acquired the land as part of a 173-acre tract from John Desellum. Fulks had subdivided the 1-acre tract from the 173-acre parcel, which had acquired the name "Wood Lot" (MCDB EBP 31 :435). John Desellum noted that "more wheat is now annually delivered here than was annually grown in the whole county," and by 1894, eight of the eighteen passenger trains operating along the Metropolitan Branch were between Washington D.C. and Gaithersburg (Christensen and Hott 1986: 3-4). The MHT State Historic Sites Inventory Form for the Gaithersburg Wye, describes the operation of the wye: "With the advent of the tuning wye, passenger locomotives, and indeed complete (short) passenger trains could be `turned' at Gaithersburg. Upon arrival of a passenger `local' from Washington, the train would stop to unload on the westbound track (or siding) at the passenger station. The train's locomotive would most likely be uncoupled from the train, move to the eastbound track and then to the wye to be `tumed' and `serviced' for its return trip to Washington. If the cars of the trains were to return to Washington without being turned, they might be left in front of the station for the Washington-bound passengers to board while the locomotive was being turned and serviced" (Christensen and Hott 1986:4). Improvements to the wye began during the early 20th century, possibly to accommodate larger locomotives which would require a larger turning radius. Ignatius Fulks sold a 0.48-acre tract and 1.03-acre tract to 8&0 for $750 on January 11,1906, as shown in an accompanying plat, for the expansion of the wye (MCDB JLB 184:451). An additional 0.43-acre tract was also acquired by the 8&0 from Any Matilda Selby on February 16,1906 for $200 (MCDB JLB 188:221). A portion of the rails and a freight buffer marks the footprint of the expanded wye. A 1930 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map is the earliest depiction of the wye, and shows a single leg of the expanded facility with a lumber yard and concrete manufacturer along its path (Sanbom Map Company 1930).
Recommended publications
  • MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting June 20, 2019 4:30Pm‐6:00Pm
    MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting June 20, 2019 4:30pm‐6:00pm Phone: 1‐888‐407‐4198 Code: 77713445# **PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOUR PHONE IS ON MUTE WHEN YOU ARE NOT SPEAKING** I. Call meeting to order Steve Chan, Chair II. Introductions III. Review of May minutes Brian Love, Acting RAC Secretary for May meeting IV. Review of May performance data Katherine Read, MARC Assistant Chief Transportation Officer V. MARC Train preparation for summer high heat/weather David Johnson (DJ), MARC Chief Transportation Officer Amtrak and Bombardier Management VI. August 5 Penn Line schedule change and 2019 Penn Line Amtrak trackwork update DJ and Amtrak Commuter Operations management VII. Old Business VIII. New Business, including questions and comments from guests Upcoming meetings (all Thursdays, 4:30‐6:00pm) July 18, 2019 (in person) August 15, 2019 (teleconference) September 19, 2019 (in person) Reminder: E‐mail rail car or station defects to Katherine Read – [email protected] MARC Train Service On-Time Performance May 2019 Same Month Month Year to Date 2018 Brunswick Line Brunswick 94.16% 96.26% 85.95% Frederick 90.15% 95.00% 87.50% West Virginia 89.39% 93.88% 81.82% Total Brunswick 91.27% 95.06% 85.08% Camden Line Camden 77.06% 87.79% 88.29% BTS OTP 83.66% 91.15% 86.88% Penn Line Baltimore 91.36% 91.76% 84.33% Perryville 86.47% 83.36% 85.09% Amtrak OTP 89.81% 89.08% 84.57% MARC SYSTEM TOTAL OTP 87.44% 89.87% 85.43% MARC On Time Performance Summary May 2019 Penn Line Weekday 89.23% Month 88.46% Year to Date 91.29% AM Southbound (Trains 401‐423)
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Train Service On-Time Performance November 2018
    MARC Train Service On-Time Performance November 2018 Same Month Month Year to Date 2017 Brunswick Line Brunswick 85.00% 93.56% 95.76% Frederick 89.66% 93.37% 94.83% West Virginia 89.74% 92.22% 92.31% Total Brunswick 88.10% 93.05% 94.30% Camden Line Camden 91.63% 90.48% 97.54% BTS OTP 89.99% 91.67% 96.04% Penn Line Baltimore 86.81% 83.93% 90.01% Perryville 81.62% 84.40% 85.09% Amtrak OTP 85.12% 84.08% 88.41% MARC SYSTEM TOTAL OTP 86.95% 86.97% 91.27% MARC On Time Performance Summary November 2018 Penn Line Weekday 84.26% Month 83.22% Year to Date 90.34% AM Southbound (Trains 401‐423) 83.20% PM Northbound (Trains 426‐448) 80.23% AM Northbound (Trains 400‐412) 80.85% PM Southbound (Trains 537‐449) Trains below 89% (late more than twice, red‐bold lower than 79%): 400 (73% month, 91% YTD) 453 (84% month, 72% YTD) 404 (74% month, 85% YTD) 511 (66% month, 82% YTD) 412 (63% month, 65% YTD) 517 (81% month, 79% YTD) 414 (79% month, 89% YTD) 520 (81% month, 89% YTD) 424 (71% month, 76% YTD) 525 (66% month, 79% YTD) 426 (81% month, 85% YTD) 532 (81% month, 80% YTD) 430 (79% month, 83% YTD) 536 (85% month, 82% YTD) 431 (85% month, 86% YTD) 537 (76% month, 81% YTD) 433 (63% month, 79% YTD) 544 (85% month, 75% YTD) 438 (84% month, 87% YTD) 579 (68% month, 71% YTD) 439 (84% month, 87% YTD) 610 (47% month, 88% YTD) 446 (68% month, 85% YTD) 634 (76% month, 74% YTD) 447 (68% month, 63% YTD) 641 (86% month, 85% YTD) 448 (85% month, 88% YTD) 642 (81% month, 85% YTD) 449 (71% month, 77% YTD) 100% for month: 407, 409, 451 Penn Line Weekend 93.33% Month 92.32%
    [Show full text]
  • Mcfrs Community Risk Analysis and Standards of Cover
    MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER Fire Station 20 Battalion 2 Bethesda Station 9041 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda Description – Ownership: Volunteer – Employees: 3 Shift Work – Apparatus Housed: Engine – Specialty Team: Hazmat – First Due Area: 4.05 mi2 – Volunteers: totaled in with the sister company Fire Station 6 Overview Bethesda, Station 20, is surrounded by important institutions, not only for their medical breakthroughs and clandestine facilities but for the employment opportunities given to the area. The businesses and institutions bring a large number of people into Station 20’s first due area during rush hour but also the two federal hospitals and research facilities bring people from all over the world. Scattered around the different facilities are quiet residential communities that have been settled for the most part since WWII. Because it is a hazmat house, two certified hazmat technicians must comprise at least two of the three-person staffing on the engine. The engine responds to hazmat incidents for additional staffing for the Hazmat Team, and Station 20 personnel certify annually by completing NFPA 472 competencies which is completed as a monthly drill . Station 20 also houses the scheduling office for the operations of Montgomery County Fire Rescue. 218 MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER High Risk Areas – Including Hazards Station 20 has METRO tracks through their first due area and it services two METRO stations: Grosvenor and Medical Center – just miles apart. The Grosvenor station serves a heavily-populated residential area and the Medical Center station services two large federal properties: NIH and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 33, Number 2 Second Quarter 2011
    ISSN 1053-4415 A QUARTERLY MAGAZINE PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY $8.00 VOLUME 33, NUMBER 2 SECOND QUARTER 2011 Letter from the Editor When I was fewer than a dozen years Lincoln, the raids by “Stonewall” Jackson, old, the centennial of the Civil War was cel- the massive transport of Union troops The official publication of THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO ebrated. It became a centerpiece of life, in southward, the defense of the railroad and RAILROAD HISTORICAL SOCIETY school and in the newspapers, along with the attacks launched against it. P. O. Box 24225 dozens of events to commemorate 100 Indeed, one worthy task—volunteers, Baltimore, Maryland 21227-0725 e-mail: [email protected] years after this and that battle or happen- please!—is to compile a timetable of website: www.borhs.org ing. It actually began with the centennial these wartime events so that they can be Missing Sentinel: [email protected] of the Harpers Ferry raid, which, of course, properly commemorated as their anni- The Baltimore and Ohio Historical Society is a involved the B&O as a central factor. versaries roll around. A bibliography of non-profit corporation dedicated to preserving and disseminating historical information about At precisely the same time, I began my the B&O story during the Civil War is The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. lifelong fascination with model railroading also a good and easy project for someone Copyright ©2011 ISSN 1053-4415 and railroad history. So there it all is: today so inclined. SOCIETY OFFICERS I’m a B&O modeler, an amateur railroad There should be photo exhibitions Bob Hubler, President Bob Weston, VP Operations historian, a Civil War re-enactor, and the and research material published on the George Stant, VP Finance owner of a Civil War-era B&O layout.
    [Show full text]
  • Pa R K & R Id E
    800.745.RIDE commuterconnections.org !"a$!"a$ 800.745.RIDE !"a$ ImIm!"a$Im A} !"a$!"a$ !"`$ ?Ï!"a$ !"a$ !"a$ !"a$!"a$ !"a$Im Im!"a$Im!"a$ !"a$Im !"a$Im )" !"a$ FINKSBURG 14 6 A| !(6 Iq (!10 !"a$!"a$Im !"b$ CASCADE Im HYDES EMMITSBURG HUNT VALLEY A¡ !"a$ MAUGANSVILLE GLYNDON Im !"a$ !"a$)"5 W A S H I N G T O N !(23 !"a$Im18 !"a$ImIm!"a$!"a$Im ?ç Iu I¥ (!7 ImIm !"a$Im FORK Ix CLEAR SPRING ?è Aø Im 4 !( !(14 Io RISING SUN REISTERSTOWN AÇ ?þ !"c$ BIG POOL Iy SMITHSBURG LITTLE ORLEANS BERKELEY SPRINGS ?ë TANEYTOWN !(5 ?Ë CONOWINGO COLORA ?Î B A L T I M O R E 17 KINGSVILLE GREAT CACAPON ?¾ !"a$ ?ï ?ó LUTHERVILLE TIMONIUM (! Iq ?Ó THURMONT C A R R O L L !(24 DARLINGTON GLEN ARM JOPPA !(2 1 8 ROCKY RIDGE ?Í (! 15 (!8 ")!( KEYMAR !(3 JARRETTSVILLE !(10 !(4 OWINGS MILLS ?¾ !(7 Iu A{ ?Ï AÓ !"d$ 5 STEVENSON 25 M O R G A N ?Ë PORT DEPOSIT ELKTON (!3 (! ?¾ !(9 Io Aw NORTH EAST "5 AÃ Ig ?ï WESTMINSTER Ay !(1 TOWSON ) HEDGESVILLE 4 PAW PAW FALLING WATERS ?Å UNION BRIDGE ?ù (!2 (! !"d$ MONKTON !"d$ Iy ?¿ ?Ó 9 ?Î UPPERCO ") %&l( 7 !( CHARLESTOWN WHITE MARSH Ix !"e$ FAIRPLAY !"a$ %&l( Io CHURCHVILLE ?ñ !"c$ ")12 ")2 NEW WINDSOR C E C I L PIKESVILLE PARKVILLE LEVELS ")8 (!7 13 (!27 AÇ SPARKS GLENCOE !(4 RANDALLSTOWN (!2 6 NOTTINGHAM • SYKESVILLE !(3 1 Highways/Major Roads Highways/Major 11 H A R F O R D !( CHESAPEAKE CITY WOODBINE (! (!1 !(1 Iu B A L T I M O R E ")3 Iy KEEDYSVILLE ")9 ?Ï A} 10 13 MARRIOTTSVILLE (!2 ?Ò FINKSBURG !"d$ ") (! ROSEDALE !(15 LIBERTYTOWN !(10 14 ")6 • 3 !"c$ (! HOV/Express Lanes Access Lanes HOV/Express )"5 ")1 A¡ HYDES LISBON )"21 B E R K E L E Y F R E D E R I C K 15 4 ?Ð SHARPSBURG 5 ") WINDSOR MILL (! ?Õ !(2 !(7 18 ") ?Ì COOKSVILLE 19 MIDDLE RIVER FORK GWYNN OAK Baltimore (! MIDDLETOWN • ?Û ROHRERSVILLE 4 WOODSTOCK Free vs.
    [Show full text]
  • I-270 Monorail Feasibility Study
    I-270 MONORAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FEBRUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapters Tables Executive Summary ................................................................................1 ES.1 Design Criteria ................................................................................2 Chapter 1 Introduction ..........................................................................9 ES.2 Potential Environmental Resource Impacts .....................................4 Chapter 2 Analysis ..............................................................................15 ES.3 Total Project Costs ..........................................................................5 Chapter 3 Impacts and Costs ...............................................................53 ES.4 Total Routine Operating Costs ........................................................5 Chapter 4 Findings ...............................................................................63 ES.5 Projected Changes in Daily Boardings for Major Transit Routes .....6 References ES.6 Projected Changes in Daily Trips Between Build and No Build........7 Appendices 2.1 Design Capacity – Number of Passengers ......................................20 2.2 I-270 Feasibility Study Monorail Design Criteria ............................22 Figures 2.3 Standard Station Dimensions .........................................................30 ES.1 Feasibility Study Monorail Alignment .............................................3 2.4 Metrorail Montgomery County Station Analysis .............................32
    [Show full text]
  • MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting November 15, 2018 4:30 Pm – 6:00 Pm Converted to Teleconference Because of Snow
    MARC Riders Advisory Council Meeting November 15, 2018 4:30 pm – 6:00 pm Converted to Teleconference because of Snow. Summary minutes I. Call meeting to order (Steve CHan, CHairman): Called to order at 4:33 PM II. Introductions (Steve CHan, CHairman): III. Review of October Minutes (ChristopHer Field, Secretary): A. Some corrections to September minutes B. No corrections to October minutes. IV. Review of October performance data (KatHerine Read, MARC Assistance CHief Transportation Officer): A. Report attacHed. B. Questions: 1. WHat is a crew delay? A crew delay is recorded wHen a crew arrives late (sucH as on a train tHat arrives late) or certain improper braking operations that sHut tHe train down in a way tHat causes delay. 2. WHy are most Perryville trains are not listed? THis indicates tHey were between 95% to 100% on time. 3. Recently several trains missed a stop. WHy does this Happen? Leaves can cause trains to slip and increase stopping distance leading to missed stations. 4. THe discussion regarding OTP mentions “Fuel pump modifications on MP-36 locomotives.” WHat is tHis? MARC has identified an issue witH tHese fuel pumps and is replacing all of to increase reliability. 5. Comment from Brunswick rider. In October tHere were over 90 email messages; mostly delays due to mecHanical. 18 trains were canceled due to mecHanical issues. Was tHis an unusual montH? (THe Council Secretary notes tHat “18 trains” differs from tHe “MARC On Time Performance-Discussion” wHicH states “six trains eitHer cancelled, terminated or delayed over an hour.”) Response was tree leaves on track leads to damage to wHeels and takes trains and cars out of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcfrs Community Risk Analysis and Standards of Cover
    MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER Fire Station 1 Battalion 1 Silver Spring Station 8110 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring Description – Ownership: County – Employees: 10 Shift Work – Apparatus Housed: Engine, Truck, Ambulance, Medic – First Due Area: 2.08 mi2 – Active LOSAP Volunteers: 36 – IECS Volunteers: 22 Overview Silver Spring Station 1 is located between Georgia Avenue (MD97) and the METRO/CSX train tracks in their back yard. Georgia Avenue itself is a major six lane highway that runs from Washington D.C. to Howard County, a county bordering Montgomery County to the northeast. Silver Spring itself “serves as the primary urban area in Montgomery County”4and has been revitalized in recent years with new national retail chains, theaters, and restaurants as well as many family-owned restaurants with their own ethnic diversity. In 2003, Discovery Communications (Discover Channel) built their new headquarters on the corner of Georgia Avenue and Colesville Road. It is a huge, state- of-the-art facility that employees over 1,000 people. 106 MCFRS COMMUNITY RISK ANALYSIS AND STANDARDS OF COVER High Risk Areas – Including Hazards Silver Spring has both the METRO and CSX railroad running through the downtown area which is served by Fire Station 1. The railroad right-of-way is used by CSX, Amtrak, and MARC trains. The Silver Spring METRO station is an above ground station. METRO services many professionals, visitors and students. In November 2010, the Silver Spring METRO Station had 12,602 pedestrians entering the METRO and 12,185 pedestrians exiting the METRO during the weekdays alone. For weekends during November 2010, 10,775 pedestrians entered the METRO at the Silver Spring Station and 10,620 exited.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting Trends for Primary Jobs During 2014
    Commuting Trends For Primary Jobs During 2014 Published April 2018 City of Gaithersburg Planning and Code Administration 31 South Summit Avenue Gaithersburg, Maryland 20877 Telephone: (301) 258-6330 [email protected] www.gaithersburgmd.gov City Officials Mayor Jud Ashman City Council Neil Harris Laurie-Anne Sayles Micheal A. Sesma Ryan Spiegel Robert T. Wu Planning Commission Chair John Bauer Vice Chair Lloyd S. Kaufman Commissioner Matthew Hopkins Commissioner Danny Winborne Alternate Commissioner Philip Wessell Responsible Staff Raymond Robinson III, Long Range Planning Manager Gregory Mann, Planner II Alyssa Roff, Transportation Planner Commuting Trends for Primary Jobs During 2014 City of Gaithersburg, Maryland Table of Contents Part 1: Report Purpose and Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………2 Methodology Overview ………………………………………………………………………………...4 Montgomery County Subdivisions and Census Tracts………………………………………..………...7 Mode of Commute Analysis ………………………………………………………………………...….9 Comparison to 2011-2012 report ………………………………………………………………………17 Study Area: City of Gaithersburg ……………………………………………………………………...18 Study Area: East of I-270 ……………………………………………………………………………...36 Study Area: West of I-270 ……………………………………………………………………………..53 Study Area: Census Tracts ……………………………………………………………………………..69 Comparison to 2011-2012 Census Data ………………………………………………………….…….95 Part 2:Appendix A. American Community Survey (ACS) 2014 B. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Data City of Gaithersburg Data East of I-270 Data West of I-270 Data
    [Show full text]
  • Iv. Central County Central County 183
    182 PLACES FROM THE PAST IV. CENTRAL COUNTY CENTRAL COUNTY 183 IV. CENTRAL COUNTY HISTORIC DISTRICTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTHOUSES HISTORIC DISTRICT (1776+) NR Vicinity of Washington Street and Courthouse Square, City of Rockville Municipality Rockville has been the county seat since Montgomery County was estab- lished in 1776. Citizens selected Rockville for its central location along an established road and for its well-established taverns to accommodate those with court business. Originally known as Montgomery Court House, the town was called Rockville by the early 1800s. Throughout the years much of Rockville’s activity has centered on the Courthouse. The Red Brick Courthouse was built in 1891, for $50,000. It is the third courthouse on the site, replacing the original courthouse of 1779, and another built in 1840. Designed by Baltimore architect Frank E. Davis, the Courthouse is built of hand-pressed brick accented with native Seneca Sandstone. The building was one of the last load-bearing , M-NCPPC, 1975 masonry structures in the county and is the finest example of Romanesque Revival architecture in the county. Most attorneys maintained offices Michael Dwyer around the Courthouse Square. The historic district includes the 100 Red Brick Courthouse (1891) block of South Washington Street, including the Gothic Revival Christ Episcopal Church, designed by Frank Davis and built 1884-7. Frame resi- dences on this block, built between 1884 and 1903, reflect Queen Anne and Colonial Revival styles popular in this era. After World War I, increasing county population led to the need for a larger courthouse. The State Legislature approved the acquisition of a Grey Courthouse (1931) block of land, to raze the existing buildings, and construct a new Courthouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix : Historic Preservation Program
    Appendix : Historic Preservation Program Objective The intent of the County’s preservation program is to provide a rational system for evaluating, protecting, and enhancing the County’s historic and architectural heritage for the benefit of present and future generations. Historic sites and districts are essential elements of community identity and the unique character of the County and its communities. The Master Plan for Historic Preservation and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, Chapter DA of the Montgomery County Code, are designed to protect and preserve Montgomery County’s historic and architectural heritage. Placement on the Master Plan officially designates a property as a historic site or historic district and subjects it to the procedural requirements of the Ordinance. Any substantial changes to the exterior of a resource or its environmental setting must be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) and a historic area work permit issued under the provisions of the Ordinance, Section BDA-F. In accordance with the Master Plan for Historic Preservation and unless otherwise specified in the amendment, the environmental setting for each site, as defined in Section DA- of the Ordinance, is the entire parcel on which the resource is located as of the date it is designated on the Master Plan. Historic Sites in Gaithersburg West The Gaithersburg West Master Plan includes historic sites that were designated in the IHE Gaithersburg Vicinity Master Plan (Belward Farm, St. Rose of Lima) and the I Germantown Master Plan (Clopper Mill Ruins). Immediately bordering the area are Maple Spring Barns and Pleasant View Church, designated in the @@B Potomac Subregion Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Trust Nr-Eligibility Review Form
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST NR-ELIGIBILITY REVIEW FORM Property Name: Metropolitan Branch, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Inventory Number: Address: Extending through Montgomery County, from Takoma Park NW to Dickerson Owner: CSX Transportation, Inc. Tax Parcel Number: Multiple (See Survey Form M:0-2) Tax Map Number: I-495/I-95 Capital Beltway Corridor Transportation Project: Improvement Study Agency: State Highway Administration Site visit by: Staff: D No D Yes Name: Eligibility recommended: _X_____________ Eligibility not recommended: Criteria: i:gi A D B D C D D. Considerations: DA OB De OD OE OF OG D None Is property located within a historic district? i:giNo 0Yes Name ofDistrict: Is district listed? 0No 0Yes I-495/I-95 Capital Beltway Corridor Transportation Improvement Study Documentation on the property/district is presented in: Historic Resources Suvey and Determination of Eligibilitv Report Description of Property and Eligibility Determination: (Use continuation sheet ifnecessary and attach map and photo): The Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad was previously surveyed by William E. Hutchinson and Carlos Avery of Sugarloaf Regional Trails in 1979. The rail line has not been altered since the prior,survey. The Metropolitan Branch of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A and C for its association with the transportation industry, as well as the agricultural and residential development of Montgomery County. The development of the railroad provided a needed stimulus to the stagnant economy of Montgomery County in the late nineteenth century. The railroad revived the agricultural economy of Montgomery County by allowing farmers to quickly ship perishable goods to market such as dairy products and produce.
    [Show full text]