DOCSLIB.ORG

GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION the Political Crisis O F Our Time

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION the Political Crisis O F Our Time GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION The Political Crisis of Our Time A Democratic Staff Report Prepared for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate June 18, 2020 Global Forced Migration The Political Crisis of Our Time Cover photo: An Aerial View of the Za’atri Refugee Camp, U.S. Department of State, July 18, 2013. CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal iii Executive Summary 1 Chapter One—The Scale of Today’s Forced Migration Crisis 11 Chapter Two—Trends in Forced Migration 15 Why More People Are Fleeing: The Changing Nature of Conflict and Violence 15 Climate Change’s Impact on Forced Migration 22 Internally Displaced Persons Under-Recognized 24 New Challenges for Forced Migrants 24 Chapter Three—Human Rights Denied 29 Pervasive Restrictions on Freedom of Movement 29 Obstacles to Accessing Identity Documentation 30 Barriers to Healthcare, Education, and Work 32 Widespread Lack of Livelihood Opportunities and Barriers to Work 34 Gender-Based Violence: An Under-Recognized Risk 37 High Risks of Human Trafficking 39 Chapter Four—Inadequate and Inconsistent International Responses 41 Diplomatic Deficit Resulting in Persistent Conflicts and Impunity 41 Insufficient and Inflexible Humanitarian Funding 42 Aid Effectiveness and Humanitarian Sector Reform 44 Need for Expanded International Legal Protections 46 Shrinking Access to Traditional Solutions 53 Inconsistent Country-level Responses to Forced Migration 55 Chapter Five—The Trump Administration’s Domestic Agenda: Blocking All Pathways to Refuge 61 The Trump Administration’s Decimation of Existing Programs 62 The Impact of Trump Administration Policies at the U.S. Border 70 The Positive Contributions of Refugees and Immigrants in the United States 80 Damage to U.S. Military Interests 83 Chapter Six—The Trump Administration’s Global Retreat from Forced Migration 85 Repeated Attempts to Cut U.S. Humanitarian Assistance Funding 85 Withdrawal from International Fora 88 The International Implications of the Administration’s Retreat 89 Chapter Seven—Current Innovative Efforts 95 New Compacts to Improve International Coordination & Response 96 Innovative Models of Financial Assistance 97 The Compact Model 99 Solutions to Better Serve Forced Migrants 101 Incorporating Technology 104 Increasing Private Sector Participation 107 Findings & Recommendations 111 Findings 111 Recommendations 113 i GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION | JUNE 2020 ii LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL UNITED STATES SENATE, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, Washington, DC, June 18, 2020. DEAR COLLEAGUES: The United States must revive its global and moral leadership to address the urgent plight of millions of people forced to flee their homes due to conflict, violence, persecution, and severe climate-related events. This global forced migration crisis is one of the most profound and least understood challenges of our time. More than ever before, conflict and violence are driving people from their homes and forcing them to live decades in displacement. Warring parties are consistently ignoring humanitarian laws designed to protect civilians during conflict, leading to civilian casualties, the destruction of critical infrastructure, and mass displacement. Other drivers of forced migration, including generalized violence and severe climate-related events, such as droughts, flooding, extreme weather, and rising sea levels, show no signs of abating. Meanwhile, the global response has not kept pace with the enormity of need. The international community and national authorities have failed to address these causes of displacement. International organizations and host countries are struggling to protect and facilitate solutions for a growing population of forced migrants. More than ever before, U.S. leadership is needed to foster and catalyze a global coalition to address this crisis. Since its founding, the United States has offered freedom and opportunity to people around the world fleeing danger. Our history of welcoming desperate people with open arms—from European Jews following World War II to Indochinese boat people to Kosovar victims of ethnic cleansing—has reinforced our reputation as a place of refuge. Many of those who originally came to the United States seeking protection have gone on to become shining beacons for our nation—artists, innovators, public servants, and even representatives of the U.S. government. The Trump administration, however, has departed sharply from this historical precedent, abdicating U.S. leadership and undermining a global response. Available legal pathways for asylum, refugee resettlement, and protection in the United States have been severed. Refugees from Muslim-majority countries, including those fleeing atrocities in Syria, have been barred. Small children have been forcibly separated from their families and held in detention centers. Migrants fleeing violence and threats to their lives have been returned by the United States to dangerous border encampments in Mexico, waiting for decisions on their applications for months or even years. Given this challenging landscape, I directed my senior Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) staff member for Migration & Human Rights, Charlotte Oldham-Moore, and SFRC Democratic Staff to prepare a comprehensive report on the global forced migration crisis. In conducting research for this report, SFRC Democratic Staff interviewed dozens of migration and humanitarian experts, analyzed key documents and reports, and carried out research trips to Colombia, Tunisia, Egypt, Bangladesh, Mexico, and Ethiopia, meeting with U.S. and national, iii GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION | JUNE 2020 provincial, and municipal government officials, United Nations and international nongovernmental organization representatives, as well as forced migrants and their host communities. I also want to thank Marisa Lowe, Judith Williams, and the SFRC Democratic Staff for their work on this report. The result of this research is a comprehensive report that lays bare the facts of today’s global forced migration crisis, the drivers of displacement, the trends impacting the situations of forced migrants, the international community’s response, and the Trump administration’s retreat. It describes a global forced migration crisis that is, at its crux, a political crisis requiring political solutions to confront the drivers of forced migration, as well as address the large numbers living in displacement. This report makes the case for urgent and sweeping action on the global forced migration crisis and argues the need for the United States to make a dramatic course correction in leading this global response. The report also makes timely recommendations for Congress, the Executive Branch, the United Nations, and other stakeholders to improve policies on forced migration. Today, there must be a bipartisan sense of urgency for renewed U.S. efforts to reform our domestic policies and international engagement relating to migration. Ignoring the plight of millions of forced migrants worldwide will only ensure that our future—the world’s and the United States’—will be far less secure and far bleaker. As the world grapples with global crisis, we must come together in global solidarity and remember those among us who have experienced the utmost dangers and require protection. Sincerely, ROBERT MENENDEZ, Ranking Member. iv A young Afghan girl waits to receive assistance at her returnee and refugee village on the outskirts of Farah City in western Afghanistan. Lt. j.g. Matthew Stroup, 130209-N-LR347-329, U.S. Navy, Feb. 9, 2013. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY girl born in a refugee camp lives her whole life in a temporary shelter, waiting A to return home to a community she has never known, a community repeatedly ravaged by war. A farmer leaves his village when insurgents arrive, then searches and fails to find shelter, water, and food. He is told to return home and is then displaced again by conflict, cycling back and forth in continuous, destitute movement. A nurse, terrorized by gang violence outside her home and domestic violence inside her home, fears for her and her daughter’s lives and leaves. They are turned away at the border, forced to wait, living in perilous tent encampments on the border, and finally deported back to danger. A fisherman is forced from their coastal community due to rising sea levels—they are no longer able to find sufficient potable water for their family to drink. They move to an urban slum to live amongst thousands of others who have suffered the same plight. A local official is forced to leave her island after tropical storm after tropical storm forces her to come to terms with the fact that her home is no longer inhabitable. She struggles to not only find somewhere for herself and her family, but for her whole island’s population—now forced to flee. No one is willing to provide them safe haven. The rich countries have closed their borders and erected walls that thousands of individuals attempt to circumvent daily. The poorer countries are inundated, less stable, and unable to provide services or safety. Thousands die each year attempting to find some place that will accept them. Millions are subjected to violence and abuse. Millions of children go uneducated. 1 GLOBAL FORCED MIGRATION | JUNE 2020 These are the stories of forced migrants already struggling to address the drivers of forced today. The exponentially increasing number of migration, and to protect and find permanent men, women, and children forced from their solutions for forced migrants. Without a homes due to conflict, persecution,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DS-5535, Supplemental Questions for Visa Applicants
    Page 1 of 22 Before the BUREAU OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Washington, DC 20520 ) 60-Day Notice of Proposed ) Information Collection: ) COMMENTS OF THE Supplemental Questions ) IDENTITY PROJECT for Visa Applicants (Form ) AND DS–5535; OMB Control ) RESTORE THE FOURTH Number 1405–0226), Docket ) Number DOS–2017–0032, ) FR Doc. 2017-16343 ) ) The Identity Project (IDP) <http://www.PapersPlease.org> Restore The Fourth, Inc. <https://www.restorethe4th.com> October 2, 2017 The Identity Project and Restore The Fourth Comments on Supplemental Questions https://papersplease.org for Visa Applicants (Form DS–5535) https://www.restorethe4th.com October 2, 2017 Page 2 of 22 I. INTRODUCTION The Identity Project and Restore The Fourth, Inc., submit these comments in response to the “60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Supplemental Questions for Visa Applicants” (Form DS–5535; OMB Control Number 1405–0226), Docket Number DOS–2017– 0032, FR Doc. 2017-16343, published at 82 Federal Register 36180-36182 (August 3, 2017). The proposed (and already ongoing) information collection does not comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the First and Fourth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, or the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). This vague and overbroad supplemental collection of information from a vaguely-defined subset of would-be visitors to the U.S. is inappropriate as a matter of policy, and contrary to U.S. national and international interests in democracy and human rights. In many cases, it would be impossible for prospective visitors to provide the requested information. Exceptions to this collection of information, like decisions to require it in the first place, would be discretionary with the Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement – Global Trends in 2015
    GLObaL LEADER ON StatISTICS ON REfugEES Trends at a Glance 2015 IN REVIEW Global forced displacement has increased in 2015, with record-high numbers. By the end of the year, 65.3 million individuals were forcibly displaced worldwide as a result of persecution, conflict, generalized violence, or human rights violations. This is 5.8 million more than the previous year (59.5 million). MILLION FORCIBLY DISPLACED If these 65.3 million persons 65.3 WORLDWIDE were a nation, they would make up the 21st largest in the world. 21.3 million persons were refugees 16.1 million under UNHCR’s mandate 5.2 million Palestinian refugees registered by UNRWA 40.8 million internally displaced persons1 3.2 million asylum-seekers 12.4 24 86 MILLION PER CENT An estimated 12.4 million people were newly displaced Developing regions hosted 86 per due to conflict or persecution in cent of the world’s refugees under 2015. This included 8.6 million UNHCR’s mandate. At 13.9 million individuals displaced2 within people, this was the highest the borders of their own country figure in more than two decades. and 1.8 million newly displaced The Least Developed Countries refugees.3 The others were new provided asylum to 4.2 million applicants for asylum. refugees or about 26 per cent of the global total. 3.7 PERSONS MILLION EVERY MINUTE 183/1000 UNHCR estimates that REFUGEES / at least 10 million people On average 24 people INHABITANTS globally were stateless at the worldwide were displaced from end of 2015. However, data their homes every minute of Lebanon hosted the largest recorded by governments and every day during 2015 – some number of refugees in relation communicated to UNHCR were 34,000 people per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Housing, Land & Property in Forced
    ACCESS TO HOUSING, LAND & PROPERTY IN FORCED DISPLACEMENT CONTEXTS Photo by Ivan Roma Manukrante AUTHOR Considerations and Recommendations for Katrien Ringelé, the World Bank Group and Other Investors Norwegian Refugee Council Executive Summary PEER REVIEWERS Access to Housing, Land and Property (HLP) is foundational to socio-economic Jim Robinson, Global inclusion and an essential steppingstone for refugees and IDPs (‘displaced Protection Cluster persons’) to rebuild their lives.8 Access to HLP means having a home, free from the Jamila El Abdellaou, fear of forced eviction, a place that offers safety, and the ability to seek livelihood HLP Expert opportunities. Displacement creates specific barriers to accessing HLP, and host government policies and practices may further restrict access intentionally or unintentionally. It is equally important to ensure that HLP legal frameworks are fully implemented and protected when violated. This requires considering HLP issues among the host population alongside those of displaced persons. Unresolved HLP issues are linked to recurring displacement, and may cause or worsen conflict, undermining stability and socio-economic development. The WBG and other investors have a role to play in strengthening host government response 8 Although different legal frameworks are applicable to refugees and IDPs, the types of barriers and challenges both groups face are similar. Therefore, the paper will refer to ‘displaced persons’ going forward. Access to Housing, Land & Property in Forced Displacement Contexts 21 to displaced person’s HLP access challenges. Such an approach begins with a thorough understanding of the HLP legal frameworks and practices and how they relate to displaced persons. It also requires implementing concrete mechanisms to enable displaced persons’ access to HLP, undertaking policy dialogue with governments, and addressing HLP rights violations as part of development efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized REPORT NO: ACS14361 Eastern Africa HOA Displacement Study: Forced Displacement and Mixed Migration in the Horn of Africa June 25, 2015 © June 2015 The UNHCR and The World Bank Group Geneva and Washington All rights reserved. Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank and UNHCR. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of UNHCR, The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank or UNHCR concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Forced Displacement: an Introduction
    _____________________ Région et Développement n° 44-2016 __________________ THE ECONOMICS OF FORCED DISPLACEMENT: AN INTRODUCTION Paolo VERME* Abstract - Forced displacement − defined as the displacement of refugees and Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) due to violence – has reached an unpre- cedented scale and global attention during the past few years, particularly in the aftermath of the Syrian refugee crisis in 2011 and the European Union’s migration crisis in 2015. As this plight gained momentum, economics found itself unprepared to answer the basic questions surrounding refugees and IDPs. Few economists or institutions were working on forced displacement. Economic theory or empirics had little to offer in terms of articles published in journals. Data were found to be scarce, unreliable or inaccessible. Can economics rise to the challenge? Is the economics of forced displacement different from neoclas- sical economics? Can we use off the shelves models to study forced displaced populations? What are we missing to do the economics of forced displacement? What are the data constraints that limit economists in this work? This paper provides a first non-technical introduction to these topics. We argue that the modelling of utility, choice, risk and information in a short-term setting is the key to address the problem. Neoclassical economics lacks some of the theoreti- cal ingredients that are needed but recent developments in game theory, neu- roeconomics and behavioral economics have opened new horizons that make the task of modelling forced displacement within reach. Empirics is clearly limi- ted by the scarcity of quality data but an example shows how welfare econo- mists can start working with existing data.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Human Dimension of Forced Migrants
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE BELAS-ARTES Globalization and Human Dimension of Forced Migrants My Kaaba is HUMAN Sinem Taş Trabalho de Projeto Mestrado em Arte Multimédia Especialização em Fotografia Trabalho de Projeto orientado pela Professora Doutora Margarida Medeiros 2017 DECLARAÇÃO DE AUTORIA Eu Sinem TAŞ, declaro que a presente dissertação / trabalho de projeto de mestrado intitulada “Globalization and Human Dimension of Forced Migrants: My Kaaba is HUMAN ”, é o resultado da minha investigação pessoal e independente. O conteúdo é original e todas as fontes consultadas estão devidamente mencionadas na bibliografia ou outras listagens de fontes documentais, tal como todas as citações diretas ou indiretas têm devida indicação ao longo do trabalho segundo as normas académicas. Sinem Taş Lisboa, 31/10/2017 RESUMO Imigração é um fenómeno que existe há séculos por causa da necessidade humana de criar novas condições de vida, procurar melhores oportunidades, encontrar solos férteis ou, às vezes, de simplesmente mudar de vida. Assim, a imigração pode ser inevitável (por exemplo nos casos de desastres naturais, guerras, guerras civis, conflitos e genocídios) ou voluntária (pela necessidade de mobilidade). Este trabalho reivindica que a imigração é diretamente construída pelas condições financeiras e políticas desde o princípio (e não pelos eventos naturais), com um foco especial nos factores como a globalização e as suas consequências para a população. Este trabalho tem como inspiração o valores humanistas dos Bektashis, que será esclarecido nos próximos capítulos. Pessoas, aparelhos de estado ou grupos influentes organizam e causam massacres e catástrofes por interesses políticos ou económicos. Por esses motivos, milhões de pessoas foram assassinadas, violadas e perseguidas.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 16-1436 In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, A PROJECT OF THE URBAN JUSTICE CENTER, INC., ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ITS CLIENTS, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI JEFFREY B. WALL Acting Solicitor General Counsel of Record CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitor General HASHIM M. MOOPPAN Deputy Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN C. BOND Assistant to the Solicitor General AUGUST E. FLENTJE Special Counsel DOUGLAS N. LETTER SHARON SWINGLE H. THOMAS BYRON III LOWELL V. STURGILL JR. Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 [email protected] (202) 514-2217 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Constitution and Acts of Congress confer on the President broad authority to prohibit or restrict the entry of aliens outside the United States when he deems it in the Nation’s interest. Exercising that authority, the President issued Executive Order No. 13,780, 82 Fed. Reg. 13,209 (Mar. 9, 2017). Section 2(c) of that Order suspends for 90 days the entry of foreign nationals from six countries that Congress or the Executive previously designated as presenting heightened terrorism-related risks, subject to case-by-case waivers. The district court issued, and the court of appeals upheld, a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of Section 2(c) against any person worldwide, because both courts concluded that the suspension violates the Establishment Clause. The questions presented are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Labor and Basic Rights in Science and Bioprospecting
    Accepted manuscript for the Annals of American Geographers, please do not cite without permission A Human Right to Science?: Precarious Labor and Basic Rights in Science and Bioprospecting Authors: Benjamin D. Neimark Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre A24 LEC 3 Library Ave, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK LA1 4YQ, email: [email protected] Saskia Vermeylen Senior Lecturer and Chancellor's Fellow University of Strathclyde, Strathclyde Centre for Environmental Law and Governance Glasgow , UK G1 1QE 1 Accepted manuscript for the Annals of American Geographers, please do not cite without permission Abstract Does everyone have the right to benefit from science? If so, what shape should benefits take? This article exposes the inequalities involved in bioprospecting through a relatively neglected Human Right, the right to benefit from Science (HRS). Although underexplored in the literature, it is acknowledged that market-based conservation practices, such as bioprospecting, often rely on cheap “casual” labor. In contrast to critical discourses exposing the exploitation and misappropriation of indigenous people’s cultural and self-determination rights in relation to bioprospecting (i.e., biopiracy), the exploitation of a low -skilled labor force for science has been little examined from a human rights perspective. Reliance on cheap labor is not just limited to those directly involved in creating local biodiversity inventories, but a whole set of other workers (cooks, porters, and logistical support staff), who contribute indirectly to the advancements of science, and whose contribution is barely acknowledged, let alone financially remunerated. As precarious workers it is difficult for laborers to use existing national and international labor laws to fight for recognition of their basic rights or easily to rely on biodiversity and environmental laws to negotiate recognition of their contribution to science.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism and Global Mobility
    U.S. Versus Them The effects of the September 11 attacks on migration policy in the United States and how this has influenced visa issuances to migrants from Muslim-majority countries in particular Anke van Gils Bachelor Thesis Geography, Planning and Environment (GPE) Nijmegen School of I Management Radboud University Nijmegen July 2020 U.S. Versus Them The effects of the September 11 attacks on migration policy in the United States and how this has influenced visa issuances to migrants from Muslim-majority countries in particular Author Anke van Gils Student Number S1003915 Supervisor Prof. Dr. Henk van Houtum Bachelor Thesis Geography, Planning and Environment (GPE) Nijmegen School of Management Radboud University Nijmegen July 2020 II Summary This Bachelor’s thesis focusses on the impacts of the September 11 attacks on visa issuances to migrants from Muslim-majority countries, in comparison to those to migrants from other countries. Since post-9/11 political and media discourse have influenced the general view of Muslims toward a more negative image, one might expect that this has also had a restrictive influence on visa issuances to migrants from Muslim-majority countries. The purpose of this thesis is therefore to find out whether migration policies have indeed become more restrictive for Muslim migrants in particular, and whether we see this impact in a larger decrease in issuances to migrants from this category, as compared to other migrants. To answer this, various methods have been used. First, a general literature framework was established through examining existing literature on how foreign policies are being developed, how these have affected global mobility over the years, and on how framing and securitization processes can affect these policy developments.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITIONERS V
    No. In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ET AL., PETITIONERS v. STATE OF HAWAII, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI NOEL J. FRANCISCO Solicitor General Counsel of Record CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General JEFFREY B. WALL EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitors General HASHIM M. MOOPPAN Deputy Assistant Attorney General JONATHAN C. BOND MICHAEL R. HUSTON Assistants to the Solicitor General SHARON SWINGLE H. THOMAS BYRON III Attorneys Department of Justice Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 [email protected] (202) 514-2217 QUESTIONS PRESENTED The Constitution and Acts of Congress confer on the President broad authority to prohibit or restrict the entry of aliens outside the United States when he deems it in the Nation’s interest. Exercising that authority after a worldwide review by multiple government agencies of whether foreign governments provide sufficient infor- mation to screen their nationals, the President issued Proclamation No. 9645, 82 Fed. Reg. 45,161 (Sept. 27, 2017). In accordance with the recommendation of the Acting Secretary of Homeland Security following the multi-agency review, the Proclamation suspends entry, subject to exceptions and case-by-case waivers, of cer- tain categories of aliens abroad from eight countries that do not share adequate information with the United States or that present other risk factors. The district court issued a preliminary injunction barring enforce- ment of the Proclamation’s entry suspensions world- wide, except as to nationals of two countries.
    [Show full text]