UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Writing the Storyteller: Folklore and Literature from Nineteenth-Century France to the Francophone World Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/05p5h8zd Author Gipson, Jennifer Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Writing the Storyteller: Folklore and Literature from Nineteenth-Century France to the Francophone World by Jennifer Lynn Gipson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French And the Designated Emphasis in Folklore in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Nicholas Paige, Chair Professor Debarati Sanyal Professor John Lindow Spring 2011 1 Abstract Writing the Storyteller: Folklore and Literature from Nineteenth-Century France to the Francophone World by Jennifer Lynn Gipson Doctor of Philosophy in French And the Designated Emphasis in Folklore University of California, Berkeley Professor Nicholas Paige, Chair Nineteenth-century modernity, according to Walter Benjamin and other critics, kills storytelling. Instead of treating this as a real disappearance, I consider how writers continually reinvent this death to work through historically specific questions about tradition, memory, and cultural transmission. In nineteenth-century France, for example, the recurrent belief in the end of tradition prompted movements for folklore collection—like Napoléon III’s decree for the preservation of poésies populaires—as well as broad reflections about the future of cultural expressivity. Nodier, Nerval, Mérimée, and Champfleury, all combined literary creation with folklore study for the eclipse of oral tradition was, paradoxically, the very foundation of modern literature as it was coming to be defined. Thus, Nerval appends to his Sylvie a folklore collection so as to mark the distance between the written and the oral, reaffirming literary modernity while mourning tradition. Though far-removed from folklore, Barbey d’Aurevilly’s short stories and fragmented frames that impede narrative transmission also question the very possibility of storytelling. In addition to such formal innovations, writers also revisited earlier storytelling topoi. In the early eighteenth century, when Antoine Galland introduced Les Mille et une nuits to the West, Schéhérazade’s life-or-death storytelling stood as commentary on the tyranny of audience demands as the patronage system was breaking down. But nineteenth-century writers returned to this ancient storytelling sultana to think about the demands of newspaper editors, growing readerships, and the transformation of literature into mass market entertainment. Finally, interest in folklore fades on the mainland, but debates about preservation of traditions and ownership of cultural goods—debates once linked to France’s colonial projects—become central to post-colonial Francophone literature. Patrick Chamoiseau and other proponents of créolité spotlight the paradox of preserving Creole storytellers’ legacies in writing—or in French. Assia Djebar even intersperses her bloody tale of a modern Algerian Schéhérazade with fragments from Galland’s eighteenth-century text, foregrounding the question of what happens to the voice and to stories after a storyteller dies. In short, folklore has a long history of being a reference point for thinking about the very notions of literature or modernity that supposedly spell its demise. Literary depictions of storytelling tell a story less about oral culture than about literature itself. And concern about who is no longer telling stories often reveals a deeper cultural anxiety about who is now writing or reading stories. i For storytellers everywhere ii Table of Contents Introduction: Writing the Storyteller: Folklore and Literature from Nineteenth-Century France to the Francophone World 1 Chapter 1: Storytellers and Story writers: Schéhérazade’s Legacy in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth- Century France 10 Chapter 2: Literature and the Death of Folklore: Nodier and Nerval 40 Chapter 3: The Conte and the Conteur: Mérimée, Barbey, and the Nineteenth-Century Short Story 65 Chapter 4: Still the Same Old Story? Assia Djebar, Patrick Chamoiseau, and the Death of the Storyteller 93 Bibliography 124 iii Acknowledgements The sheer number of people involved in making a dissertation possible renders these acknowledgements the most necessarily incomplete part of my work. I begin by recognizing everyone who has ever supported French in the bayous of Louisiana and who made it possible for me to learn—and be proud of—the language I grew up hearing my grandmother speak. I am especially indebted to the Council for the Development of French in Louisiana and to Clint, Liz, Dana, and to everyone at France-Louisiane. Lâchez pas, mes amis. More thanks than I can express are due to my family, including my four-legged family members. Thanks to my mother “MamaLou,” a high school math teacher, who sees her three daughters as her most important work—and taught me to love books before teaching me fractions. Also to her mother, an elementary school teacher whose massive collection of discarded library books fueled my childhood imagination and whose ever-present Larousse dictionary fueled my future intellectual passion and remains one of my favorite memories of her. To my father—who years ago wondered in response to Loretta Lynn’s song “Coal Miner’s Daughter” if anyone would ever say she was proud to be an oilfield tool pusher’s daughter—my thanks for teaching me to respect the land and to never equate schooling with education. And to his mother, who knew how to do business and pick friends and whom I will always remember for her generous giving and merciless wit. To Lowry Martin, my “soul friend” and favorite Texan, whom I think of as family: know that you were the best part of life in California. One would be blessed to have a friendship half of ours. To my “substitute grandmother,” distant cousin, and dear friend, Mrs. Mary-Ingrid Jones, who did not live to see me complete this dissertation as she many times said she hoped she would, but gave me years of prayers, poems, and food containers never returned empty, and, most importantly, a model of the steadfast faith and enduring grace of a true lady. So many people have encouraged me through my graduate work: France, Margo, Jeff, master of the bell tower, Julien, my littlest friend, and his parents, to name a few. For invaluable guidance throughout this project, I thank my second and third committee members: Debarati Sanyal for her expertise on all things nineteenth-century and John Lindow for his insightful critiques of my work and for his perspectives on folklore study. While I cannot list “honorary committee members” on my signature page, I would be amiss in not naming Ann Smock as such here. My most heartfelt gratitude to the two teachers and scholars who have most shaped my graduate career. The late Alan Dundes, professor of folklore at Berkeley for over forty years, saw the folklorist in me before I did. The two years I studied with him gave me a reason to keep on in academia—and gave me an intellectual passion that became the basis of my dissertation. His influence lives on in so many Berkeley graduates who were fortunate enough to witness his sheer delight in folklore study. Telling Prof. Dundes a joke he hadn’t heard yet remains one of my greatest victories here. Lastly, my dissertation director, Nicholas Paige, is the finest teacher and mentor I could have ever hoped for, and his rigorous feedback and high expectations have made this project what it is. But I owe you thanks, Nick, for so much more than graciously adding me and my storytellers to your workload: you make hard things easier, and you pay attention to the little things that matter the most. Your example has made me a better scholar, a better teacher, and a better person, and, for that, you will forever have my gratitude. 1 Introduction: Writing the Storyteller: Literature and Folklore from Nineteenth-Century France to the Francophone World Long before stories were written, stories were told. Long before there were authors, there were storytellers. In literary practice, however, the written and the oral seldom lend themselves to such neat dichotomies. Folklore, orality, and tradition are not simply the stuff of literature’s pre-history; they are on-going players in literary history. Folklore’s most obvious role in literature could be likened to that of a library of collective cultural production from which writers from Rabelais to Proust borrow motifs, proverbs, tale types, or other traditional content. But folklore—or at least what writers imagine it to be—is also a reference point for literary production. Especially when the material conditions of print culture or the economics of literary production are in flux, writers rethink their own craft by returning to the archetypal ingredients of narrative exchange: a storyteller, a story, and listeners. The literary manifestations and implications of this are anything but simple. Original material can be presented as traditional or vice versa. Or writers can invoke oral traditions to tell a story about the past—and cast themselves as the future or their literature as an instrument of cultural transmission and preservation. Folklore in literature is, therefore, not just traditional content that can be identified, isolated and extracted