DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimal Interleaving: Serial Phonology-Morphology Interaction in a Constraint-Based Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimal Interleaving: Serial Phonology-Morphology Interaction in a Constraint-Based Model OPTIMAL INTERLEAVING: SERIAL PHONOLOGY-MORPHOLOGY INTERACTION IN A CONSTRAINT-BASED MODEL A Dissertation Presented by MATTHEW ADAM WOLF Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY September 2008 Department of Linguistics © Copyright by Matthew Adam Wolf 2008 All Rights Reserved OPTIMAL INTERLEAVING: SERIAL PHONOLOGY-MORPHOLOGY INTERACTION IN A CONSTRAINT-BASED MODEL A Dissertation Presented by MATTHEW A. WOLF Approved as to style and content by: ____________________________________ John J. McCarthy, Chair ____________________________________ Joseph V. Pater, Member ____________________________________ Elisabeth O. Selkirk, Member ____________________________________ Mark H. Feinstein, Member ___________________________________ Elisabeth O. Selkirk, Head Department of Linguistics ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I’ve learned from my own habits over the years that the acknowledgements are likely to be the most-read part of any dissertation. It is therefore with a degree of trepidation that I set down these words of thanks, knowing that any omissions or infelicities I might commit will be a source of amusement for who-knows-how-many future generations of first-year graduate students. So while I’ll make an effort to avoid cliché, falling into it will sometimes be inevitable—for example, when I say (as I must, for it is true) that this work could never have been completed without the help of my advisor, John McCarthy. John’s willingness to patiently hear out half-baked ideas, his encyclopedic knowledge of the phonology literature, his almost unbelievably thorough critical eye, and his dogged insistence on making the vague explicit have made this dissertation far better, and far better presented, than I could have hoped to achieve on my own. Joe Pater provided invaluable assistance through his reliable talent for noticing important connections and implications which no one else would have. My conversations with Lisa Selkirk resulted in major improvements in the exposition of the thesis, and brought many important foundational questions to the surface which would otherwise have remained dormant. With Mark Feinstein I had valuable exchanges regarding the place of my theory within a broader cognitive picture. The basic idea pursued in this thesis—putting spell-out and phonology in one tableau—was born in an independent study on morphological theory with Peggy Speas. Gaja Jarosz, John Kingston, Chris Potts, and Ellen Woolford also provided helpful iv comments related to material contained herein. Chris Potts and Lyn Frazier deserve special thanks for overseeing the torturously over-long writing of my second generals paper. It was a privilege to work with Kyle Johnson the first time that I TAed Linguistics 201. My other teachers Angelika Kratzer, Tom Roeper, and Yorghos Tripodis helped make me a more well-rounded linguist. My undergraduate linguistics teachers, in particular Bill Badecker, Luigi Burzio, Robert Frank, and Paul Smolensky, helped lay the earliest foundations for this project. My fellow phonology students have made UMass a great place to do what I do. Leah Bateman, Michael Becker, Tim Beechey, Emily Elfner, Kathryn Flack, Elena Innes, Shigeto Kawahara, Mike Key, Wendell Kimper, Kathryn Pruitt, Anne-Michelle Tessier, and Adam Werle deserve particular thanks. Outside the phonology world, Rajesh Bhatt, Tom Braden, Shai Cohen, Amy Rose Deal, Andrew McKenzie, Barbara Partee, Helen Stickney, and Youri Zabbal helped in their different ways to make the grad school experience nicer. Tim Beechey, Ilaria Frana, Vincent van Gerven-Oei, Tanja Heizmann, Keir Moulton, and Florian Schwarz were excellent company to have during the roller- coaster ride of first year. Many parts of this dissertation owe a significant debt to the assistance of phonologists from beyond UMass. The ‘once/always’ and ‘only one way of deriving counts’ predictions of the account of non-derived environment blocking in chapter 4 were identified by Donca Steriade. The analyses of Dyirbal and Pitjantjatjara in chapter 2 are adapted from my chapter ‘Lexical insertion occurs in the phonological component’ (Wolf to appear), which is forthcoming in Understanding Allomorphy: Perspectives from OT, edited by Bernard Tranel, whom I thank for inviting me to v contribute to the volume. The same material was presented in somewhat different form at the 15th Manchester Phonology Meeting, where I received valuable feedback from Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, Patrik Bye, Bruce Morén, Mary Paster, Jochen Trommer, and Christian Uffman. Marc van Oostendorp also shared interesting comments on the chapter. I had fruitful discussions of NDEB and allomorph selection with Joan Mascaró. I presented portions of chapter 3 at Reed College in April 2008, where I received many helpful comments and questions, especially from Matt Pearson. Over the years, I’ve also had valuable exchanges about various aspects of the phonology/morphology interface with Adam Albright, Lev Blumenfeld, Luigi Burzio, Paul de Lacy, Melissa Frazier, Gillian Gallagher, Bruce Hayes, Ania Łubowicz, Ehren Reilly, Curt Rice, Patricia Shaw, and Paul Smolensky. At HUMDRUM 2006 at Johns Hopkins, I also had the chance to get comments on a (very) early version of the dissertation’s core proposal from Alan Prince and Bruce Tesar. Extra-special thanks are due to Elizabeth Zsiga and everyone else at Georgetown for offering me a job, which provided crucial motivation for getting this thing finished. Kathy Adamczyk, Sarah Vega-Liros, Lynne Ballard, and Tom Maxfield cannot be thanked enough for their many acts of administrative help. Pages could be filled describing the ways in which Karen Jesney helped keep me level-headed throughout the dissertation process, and the many times when she patiently put up with me when I couldn’t keep myself from coming unhinged. Her intellectual assistance was just as valuable. My parents were unfailing in their willingness to help me in every way that I asked, even as I retreated further and further into the cocoon of late-stage dissertating. The completion of this work was made vi immeasurably easier by a University of Massachusetts University fellowship, which allowed me to focus full-time on this project for the last twelve months. I am eternally in awe of everyone who has ever completed a Ph.D. on time while also teaching in their dissertation year. vii ABSTRACT OPTIMAL INTERLEAVING: SERIAL PHONOLOGY-MORPHOLOGY INTERACTION IN A CONSTRAINT-BASED MODEL SEPTEMBER 2008 MATTHEW ADAM WOLF, B.A., THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PH.D., UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST Directed by: Professor John J. McCarthy This dissertation proposes a novel theory of the phonology-morphology interface called Optimal Interleaving (OI). OI is based on Optimality Theory with Candidate Chains (OT-CC), which is proposed by McCarthy (2007a) as a serial architecture for Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky 2004 [1993]). OI adds to OT-CC the hypothesis that morphological spell-out (Halle & Marantz 1993’s ‘vocabulary insertion’) occurs in the phonological component of the grammar. OI thus allows phonological and morphological operations to be interleaved in a fashion similar to that assumed in the theory of Lexical Phonology (Kiparsky 1982a,b, Mohanan 1982). Chapters 2 and 3 argue that OI makes a number of correct predictions about phonologically-conditioned allomorph selection. Chiefly, OI derives the empirical generalization that allomorph selection is always opaque with respect to phonology conditioned by the competing allomorphs (Paster 2005, 2006, to appear). It does so while keeping phonologically-driven allomorphy in the phonology and governed by phonological constraints. OI therefore avoids a version of the Duplication Problem (Clayton 1976) which is faced by theories which derive the opacity generalization by viii attributing all allomorph selection to subcategorization in the morphology (Paster 2005, 2006, to appear; Bye 2007). Chapter 4 shows that OI, and more generally OT-CC, can be applied to non- derived environment blocking (NDEB: Kiparsky 1973a). It is shown that OI makes five correct predictions about NDEB which are not collectively predicted by any other theory of this phenomenon. OI achieves these results without having to make any special assumptions specific to NDEB. This places OT-CC at a considerable advantage as a theory of opacity relative to rule-based phonology, where NDEB requires stipulated restrictions on rule application like the Strict Cycle Condition (Kean 1974, Mascaró 1976). Chapter 5 shows that OI also lends itself to the two other main types of serial phonology/morphology interactions: ‘cyclic’ overapplication of a process, and underapplication of a process in a morphologically-derived environment. The chapter also critiques existing theories of these effects, particularly OO-faithfulness (Benua 1997), Stratal OT (Kiparsky 2000), and the phonological application of the theory of phases (Marvin 2002). ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................viii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... xiv CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Children Learn to Write Words
    How Children Learn to Write Words How Children Learn to Write Words Rebecca TReiman and bReTT KessleR 1 3 Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 © Oxford University Press 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above. You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer. A copy of this book’s Catalog-in-Publication Data is on file with the Library of Congress ISBN 978–0–19–990797–7
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Range: 0530–058F
    Armenian Range: 0530–058F This file contains an excerpt from the character code tables and list of character names for The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 This file may be changed at any time without notice to reflect errata or other updates to the Unicode Standard. See https://www.unicode.org/errata/ for an up-to-date list of errata. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/ for access to a complete list of the latest character code charts. See https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-14.0/ for charts showing only the characters added in Unicode 14.0. See https://www.unicode.org/Public/14.0.0/charts/ for a complete archived file of character code charts for Unicode 14.0. Disclaimer These charts are provided as the online reference to the character contents of the Unicode Standard, Version 14.0 but do not provide all the information needed to fully support individual scripts using the Unicode Standard. For a complete understanding of the use of the characters contained in this file, please consult the appropriate sections of The Unicode Standard, Version 14.0, online at https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/, as well as Unicode Standard Annexes #9, #11, #14, #15, #24, #29, #31, #34, #38, #41, #42, #44, #45, and #50, the other Unicode Technical Reports and Standards, and the Unicode Character Database, which are available online. See https://www.unicode.org/ucd/ and https://www.unicode.org/reports/ A thorough understanding of the information contained in these additional sources is required for a successful implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • N5020 2019-01-11
    ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 N____ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N5020 2019-01-11 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) - ISO/IEC 10646 Secretariat: ANSI DOC TYPE: Meeting minutes TITLE: Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 67 SOAS University of London, London, UK; 2018-06-16/20 SOURCE: V.S. Umamaheswaran ([email protected]), Recording Secretary Michel Suignard ([email protected]), Convener PROJECT: JTC 1.02.18 - ISO/IEC 10646 STATUS: SC 2/WG 2 participants are requested to review the attached unconfirmed minutes, act on appropriate noted action items, and to send any comments or corrections to the convener as soon as possible but no later than the due date below. ACTION ID: ACT DUE DATE: 2019-05-01 DISTRIBUTION: SC 2/WG 2 members and Liaison organizations MEDIUM: Acrobat PDF file NO. OF PAGES: 46 (including cover sheet) ISO International Organization for Standardization Organisation Internationale de Normalisation ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 Universal Coded Character Set (UCS) ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2 N____ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N5020 2019-01-11 Title: Unconfirmed minutes of WG 2 meeting 67 SOAS University of London, London, UK; 2018-06-16/20 Source: V.S. Umamaheswaran ([email protected]), Recording Secretary Michel Suignard ([email protected]), Convener Action: WG 2 members and Liaison organizations Distribution: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 members and liaison organizations 1 Opening Input document: 4950 Agenda for the 67th Meeting of ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC2/WG2, SOAS, London, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Phonetic Characters in Unicode∗
    Armenian Phonetic Characters in Unicode∗ Luc V. Baronian, PhD Visiting Scholar, Stanford Associate Professor, UQAC January 19, 2017 1 Introduction Armenian has a relatively small number of speakers, yet it has a sesquimillennial written tradition and several contemporary academic publications. The numeric disadvantage, combined with the existence of two standard versions of the modern language (Eastern and Western), a unique alphabet and the evolution of Armenia's universities in the sphere of Russia, rather than that of Western Europe and North America, have all contributed to a poorer knowledge of its language and its academic achievements in the West than it deserves. For example, there exists an Armenian linguistic tradition, which, like the American, French and other linguistic traditions, has used a phonetic alphabet of its own for about a century, but based on the Armenian alphabet. The works of Hrach'ya Acharyan1 were crucial in disseminating the use of this phonetic alphabet still in use today among Armenian scholars. 2 The characters proposed for inclusion in Unicode While most of the Armenian phonetic characters consist of Armenian letters with or without the use of diacritics such as the umlaut or a combining ring, I have identified two characters that cannot be represented in the current state of Unicode. The first character consists of ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER AYB (U+0561, ) rotated 180 degrees. The letter could sometimes be confused for a LATIN SMALL LETTER M (U+006D); however, in those Armenian fonts that use square angles for Ayb, the difference is noticeable. Even a rotated curvy Ayb may look different from an m, especially in the rendition of the initial m-stroke (final Ayb-stroke).
    [Show full text]
  • MSR-4: Annotated Repertoire Tables, Non-CJK
    Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4 Annotated Repertoire Tables, Non-CJK Integration Panel Date: 2019-01-25 How to read this file: This file shows all non-CJK characters that are included in the MSR-4 with a yellow background. The set of these code points matches the repertoire specified in the XML format of the MSR. Where present, annotations on individual code points indicate some or all of the languages a code point is used for. This file lists only those Unicode blocks containing non-CJK code points included in the MSR. Code points listed in this document, which are PVALID in IDNA2008 but excluded from the MSR for various reasons are shown with pinkish annotations indicating the primary rationale for excluding the code points, together with other information about usage background, where present. Code points shown with a white background are not PVALID in IDNA2008. Repertoire corresponding to the CJK Unified Ideographs: Main (4E00-9FFF), Extension-A (3400-4DBF), Extension B (20000- 2A6DF), and Hangul Syllables (AC00-D7A3) are included in separate files. For links to these files see "Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4: Overview and Rationale". How the repertoire was chosen: This file only provides a brief categorization of code points that are PVALID in IDNA2008 but excluded from the MSR. For a complete discussion of the principles and guidelines followed by the Integration Panel in creating the MSR, as well as links to the other files, please see “Maximal Starting Repertoire - MSR-4: Overview and Rationale”. Brief description of exclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for an Armenian Script Root Zone LGR 1 General Information
    Proposal for an Armenian Script Root Zone LGR Version 3 Date: 2015-06-04 1 General information The purpose of this document is to give an overview of the proposed LGR and the rationale behind the design decisions taken. It includes a discussion of relevant features of the script, the communities or languages using it, the process and methodology used and information on the contributors. The formal specification of the LGR can be found in the accompanying XML document (Proposed-LGR-Armn- 20150604.xml). 1.1 Script for which the LGR is proposed Code: Armn N°: 230 English Name: Armenian Property Value Alias: Armenian Date: 2004-05-01 English name of the script: Hye Native name of the script: հայ The Armenian language is an Indo-European language spoken by the Armenians. It is the official language of the Republic of Armenia and the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. It has historically been spoken throughout the Armenian Highlands and today is widely spoken in the Armenian Diaspora. Armenian has its own unique script, the Armenian alphabet, invented in 405 AD by Mesrop Mashtots. Linguists classify Armenian as an independent branch of the Indo-European language family. There are two standardized modern literary forms, Eastern Armenian and Western Armenian, with which most contemporary dialects are mutually intelligible. 1 1.2 Principal languages using that script List Language code and name for each (from ISO 639-3) ISO 639-1 hy ISO 639-2 arm (B) hye (T) ISO 639-3 Variously: hye – Modern Armenian xcl – Classical Armenian axm – Middle Armenian Glottolog arme1241 Linguasphere 57-AAA-a 1.3 Geographic territories or countries with significant user communities for the script Official language in Armenia Nagorno-Karabakh Republic Big Diaspora using the Armenian language in Argentina Brazil Cyprus France Georgia (Samtskhe- Javakheti) Hungary Iraq Lebanon Poland Romania Syria Turkey Ukraine United States 2 Uruguay Total Armenian population in the world is about 10mln.
    [Show full text]
  • Fasold R., Connor-Linton J
    0521847680pre_pi-xvi.qxd 1/11/06 3:32 PM Page i sushil Quark11:Desktop Folder: An Introduction to Language and Linguistics This accessible new textbook is the only introduction to linguistics in which each chapter is written by an expert who teaches courses on that topic, ensuring balanced and uniformly excellent coverage of the full range of modern linguistics. Assuming no prior knowledge, the text offers a clear introduction to the traditional topics of structural linguistics (theories of sound, form, meaning, and language change), and in addition provides full coverage of contextual linguistics, including separate chapters on discourse, dialect variation, language and culture, and the politics of language. There are also up-to-date separate chapters on language and the brain, computational linguistics, writing, child language acquisition, and second language learning. The breadth of the textbook makes it ideal for introductory courses on language and linguistics offered by departments of English, sociology, anthropology, and communications, as well as by linguistics departments. RALPH FASOLD is Professor Emeritus and past Chair of the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University. He is the author of four books and editor or coeditor of six others. Among them are the textbooks The Sociolinguistics of Society (1984) and The Sociolinguistics of Language (1990). JEFF CONNOR-LINTON is an Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University, where he has been Head of the Applied Linguistics Program and Department
    [Show full text]
  • I.Mkrtumyan, Armenian Registry
    Arm GP Proposal for an Armenian Script Root Zone LGR (TLDCON-2015, IDN Session) I.Mkrtumyan, Armenian Generation Panel ISOC Annual Meeting, Yerevan, 1 Nov. 7, 2012 General information Armenian IDN • Code: Armn • N°: 230 • English Name: Armenian • English name of the script: Hye • Native name of the script: հայ The announcement for the successful completion of Armenia's string evaluation has been posted at https://www.icann.org/news/announcement- 2014-11-20-en. September 10, 2015 TLDCON-2015, IDN Session 2 Armenian language • The Armenian language is an Indo- European language spoken by the Armenians. It is the official language of the Republic of Armenia and the self- proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. It has historically been spoken throughout the Armenian Highlands and today is widely spoken in the Armenian Diaspora. September 10, 2015 TLDCON-2015, IDN Session 3 Armenian language • Armenians has its own unique script, the Armenian alphabet, invented in 405 AD by Mesrop Mashtots. • Linguists classify Armenian as an independent branch of the Indo-European language family. • There are two standardized modern literary forms, Eastern Armenian and Western Armenian, with which most contemporary dialects are mutually intelligible. • Total Armenian population in the world is about 10mln. September 10, 2015 TLDCON-2015, IDN Session 4 Geographic territories or countries with significant user communities for the script Official language in Armenia and Nagorno Karabakh Republic Big Diaspora using the Armenian language in Argentina Poland Brazil
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian and Cyrillic Homoglyphs
    IDN Root Zone LGR Workshop Sarmad Hussain | ICANN54 | 21 October 2015 Agenda Root Zone LGR – Asmus Freytag, IP Community Updates Chinese GP update – Wang Wei Japanese GP update – Hiro Hotta Arabic Script GP update – Nabil Benamar Armenian GP update – Igor Mkrtumyan Cyrillic GP update – Yuriy Kargapolov Q/A | 3 Armenian Generation Panel Lianna Galstyan and Igor Mkrtumyan Armenian language • The Armenian language is an Indo-European language spoken by the Armenians. It is the official language of the Republic of Armenia and the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. It has historically been spoken throughout the Armenian Highlands and today is widely spoken in the Armenian Diaspora. The following web site contains a full description of the Armenian repertoire for use in the Armenian writing system: http://www.omniglot.com/writing/armenian.htm October 21, 2015 IDN Workshop, ICANN 54 45 Selected code points Code Script Name Code Script Name 0561 ա ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER AYB 0574 մ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER MEN 0562 բ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER BEN 0575 յ RMENIAN SMALL LETTER YI 0563 գ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER GIM 0576 ն ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER NOW 0564 դ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER DA 0577 շ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER SHA 0565 ե ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER ECH 0578 ո ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER VO 0566 զ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER ZA 0579 չ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER CHA 0567 է ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER EH 057A պ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER PEH 0568 ը ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER ET 057B ջ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER JHEH 0569 թ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER TO 057C ռ ARMENIAN SMALL LETTER RA 056A ժ ARMENIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Adjust Identifier Properties
    Proposal to Adjust Identifier Properties Date: 2019‐10‐07 Authors: Asmus Freytag, Mark Davis and Michel Suignard 1 Status This is an updated document. Appendices 3 and 4 are new, and for each section the proposed changes have been summarized. 2 Overview UTS#39 “Unicode Security Measures” provides a breakdown of code points by several overlapping Identifier Types. For example, “Exclusion” is based on UAX#31 “Unicode Identifier and Pattern Syntax” Table 4 and defines code points that should be excluded from identifiers as belonging to scripts and blocks of special use, archaic, liturgical and other uncommon or problematic characters. Since 2013, ICANN has been engaged in a process of defining the repertoire for IDN top level domain names resulting in a specification called the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (RZ‐LGR). As first step in that process, a Maximal Starting Repertoire (MSR) has been created, that similar to the Identifier Types attempts to set an outer boundary of code points, within which the LGRs for specific scripts can be designed. The scope of the RZ‐LGR and therefore the MSR in principle encompasses all modern writing systems that are in general, everyday use. (See the [Procedure] document establishing the parameters and goals of the project). The development of the MSR took into account the information from UAX#31 on recommended scripts, but excluded Bopomofo, which was seen as not sufficiently general. Where code points weren’t associated with known orthographies, the developers consulted the original character proposals (where available) to understand the nature of the proposed character and whether they were for modern orthographies of more specialized purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • IDN Program Update Sarmad Hussain | IDN Program Sr
    IDN Program Update Sarmad Hussain | IDN Program Sr. Manager | 24 June 2015 Agenda ¤ IDN Program - Overview and Progress – Sarmad Hussain ¤ Integration Panel Update – Integration Panel ¤ Community Updates: • Arabic Generaon Panel – Meikal Mumin • Armenian Generaon Panel – Igor Mkrtumyan • Japanese Generaon Panel - Hiro Hoa • Korean Generaon Panel - Kyongsok Kim ¤ Q&A | 3 IDN Program – Overview and Progress Sarmad Hussain IDN Program Senior Manager ICANN Overview of Presentation !! IDNs at Top Level •! IDN TLD Program ?(@' ?(@' A9)&%B&#+,*' H)I).,93)*6' o! Label Generation Ruleset (LGR) #*C'D,,.'E-FG' E-JKJG' o LGR Toolset ! 4HL'M#"K' 4HL'&&D?H' 439.K'E-NG' O#:6'D"#&1' o! IDN Variant Implementation •! IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process 4HL'?#*52#5)' 4HL''439.K' Implementation D#$.):' (2%C).%*):'' !! IDNs at Second Level for gTLDs P,332*%&#+,*:'-.#*' •! IDN Implementation Guidelines QR)&2+,*' •! IDN Tables !! Community Outreach and Involvement | 5 IDN TLD Program H)6)"3%*)' 439.)3)*6' 4C)*+Y7'4::2):' H)B*)'-",$.)3' A,.2+,*' A,.2+,*' P#:)'A62C%):T' 4*6)5"#6)C'4::2):' -",W)&6:T' -",W)&6:T' !"#$%&' @)9,"6'' -F'?(@'X0?' -F'?(@'A9)&:K' PU%*):)' A9)&%B&#+,*' #*C'D,,.:)6' P7"%..%&' -JKF'?(@'-",&)::' -JKJ'?(@' Y,"'6U)'@,,6'Z,*)' H)I).,93)*6' -<!AQ'F'EJSFFG' H)I#*#5#"%' -['\:)"' -N'?(@' ("))1' -<!AQ'J'EJSFF;FJG' -<!AQ'V'EJSFJ;FVG' QR9)"%)*&)'A62C7' 439.)3)*6#+,*' -<!AQ']'EA%*&)'JSFVG' ?#+*' Y,"'D?H'M#"%#*6:' Community agreed to define Label Generation Rules (LGR). Reports and documentation of all completed projects available at: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/reports-2013-04-03-en.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Malware Analysis Report For
    ID: 430572 Cookbook: browseurl.jbs Time: 16:38:56 Date: 07/06/2021 Version: 32.0.0 Black Diamond Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Analysis Report https://www.weebly.com/app/help/us/en/topics/quick-answer-guide 3 Overview 3 General Information 3 Detection 3 Signatures 3 Classification 3 Process Tree 3 Malware Configuration 3 Yara Overview 3 Sigma Overview 3 Signature Overview 3 Mitre Att&ck Matrix 4 Behavior Graph 4 Screenshots 4 Thumbnails 4 Antivirus, Machine Learning and Genetic Malware Detection 5 Initial Sample 5 Dropped Files 5 Unpacked PE Files 5 Domains 5 URLs 5 Domains and IPs 6 Contacted Domains 6 Contacted URLs 6 URLs from Memory and Binaries 6 Contacted IPs 6 Public 6 General Information 6 Simulations 7 Behavior and APIs 7 Joe Sandbox View / Context 7 IPs 7 Domains 7 ASN 7 JA3 Fingerprints 7 Dropped Files 7 Created / dropped Files 7 Static File Info 17 No static file info 17 Network Behavior 17 Network Port Distribution 17 TCP Packets 17 UDP Packets 17 DNS Queries 17 DNS Answers 17 HTTPS Packets 18 Code Manipulations 20 Statistics 20 Behavior 20 System Behavior 20 Analysis Process: iexplore.exe PID: 3412 Parent PID: 792 20 General 20 File Activities 20 Registry Activities 20 Analysis Process: iexplore.exe PID: 4084 Parent PID: 3412 20 General 20 File Activities 21 Registry Activities 21 Disassembly 21 Copyright Joe Security LLC 2021 Page 2 of 21 Analysis Report https://www.weebly.com/app/help/us/en…/topics/quick-answer-guide Overview General Information Detection Signatures Classification Sample URL: https://www.weebly.c No high impact signatures.
    [Show full text]