Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Possible Mechanism of Anticonvulsant Effect of Ketamine in Mice

Possible Mechanism of Anticonvulsant Effect of Ketamine in Mice

Indian Jo urnal of Experimental Biology Vol. 39, October 200 I, pp. I 002-1008

Possible mechanism of anticonvulsant effect of in mice

Anshu Manocha*, Krishna Kumar Sharma & Pramod Kumari Mediratta Department of Pharmacology, University Coll ege of Medical Sciences & GTB Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi 110095 Received 8 September 2000; re vised 25 May 2001

The study was designed to investi gate the effect of ketamine on convulsive behaviour using maximal electroshock (MES) test. An attempt was also made to study the possible mechanisms involved. MES seizures were induced in mice via transauricular electrodes (60mA, 0.2sec). Seizure severity was assessed by the duration of tonic hindlimb extensor phase and mortality due to convulsions. fntraperitoneal administration of ketamine produced a dose-dependent (5-50mg/kg) protection against hindlimb extensor phase. The anticonvulsant effect of ketamine was antagoni zed neither by (low as wel l as high doses) nor sulpiride, but was attenuated by , a dopamine (D 2)/sigma receptor antagoni st. Co­ administration of y-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic (GABA, muscimo l, di?.zepam and ) and N-meth yi-D­ aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, (MK801) with ketamine facilitated the anticonvulsant action of the latter . In contrast, , a (BZD)-GABAA receptor antagonist, reversed the facilitatory effect of diaze­ pam on the anti-MES effect of ketamine. Similarly, 8-amin ovaleric acid (DA VA), antagonized the facilitatory effect of ba­ clofen on anti-MES action of ketamine. These BZD-GABAergic antagonists, flumazenil or DA VA per se al so attenuated th e anti-MES effect of ketamine given alone. The results suggest that besides its known antagoni stic effect on NMDA channel, other systems i.e. sigma, GABAA-BZD-chloride chann el complex and GABA8 receptors may also be in­ vo lved in the anti-MES action of ketamine.

15 18 Ketamine, a anaesthetic and a known nergic and serotonergic neurotransmission - . These sigma receptor preferring is reported to act as effects could be primarily due to its actions on the 15 18 an antagonist of N-methyl-0-aspartate (NMDA)­ NMDA receptors - • Additionally, y-aminobutyric mediated transmission by blocking the acid (GABA)ergic transmission can also be affected 1 11 (PCP) site at the NMDA receptor complex • In some by ketamine either directly or indirectli' ; however, studies, ketamine (5-40mg/kg) was found to be anti­ this contention needs further exploration. In light of convul sant against generalized tonic-clonic seizures these developments focussing the role of ketamine in (GTCS) induced by mercaptopropionic acid, pentyle­ seizures and to reconcile the rel ated divergent reports, 2 netet:-azole (PTZ), and in rats · the present study has been designed to investigate its 5 . Ketamine also di splayed anticonvulsant action on pro- or anticonvulsant action using maximal electro­ seizures due to cortical application of penicil lin in shock (MES) seizure test, an animal analogue model rabbits and abolished the tonic phase of the seizures for grandma! epilepsy. An attempt has also been made evoked by sudden cooling of toad isolated spinal to determine the possible receptor mechanisms in­ 6 7 cords · . Further, ketamine suppressed ­ volved. pilocarpine- and ethacrynic acid-induced status epi­ 8 9 lepticus in rodents · . On the other hand, in some Materials and Methods studies ketamine (2.5-30mg/kg) has been found to be Animals-Albino Swiss mice of either sex (20- proconvulsant, since it activated epileptiform dis­ 25g) (procured from Central Animal Breeding House, charges in the neocortical cobalt generated focus or AIIMS, Delhi) were used. The animals were housed . . I 'l . 10 II B h . d cort1coret1cu ar e p1 epsy 111 cats · . ot ant1- an in plastic cages at an ambient temperature (25±2°C) proconvulsant effects of ketamine (1-13 mg/kg) have and 45-55% RH and maintained on a 12: 12hr light­ also been reported in mentally retarded human epi- . 12 dark (0700-1900 hrs) cycle. Food and were 1eptiCS . provided ad libitum and animals were acclimatised to 'd . d' . NMDA I 13 14 B est es 1ts 1rect act1on on receptor · · , their environment for atleast one week before experi­ ketamine affects dopaminergic, n01·adrenergic, choli- mentation. The animals were randomly divided into different groups. *E- 99, Preet Vihar Delhi 110092, India. Each experimental group consisted of a minimum Phone 22 14073(R) of 10 animals. Each animal was housed separately MANOCHA et al.: ANTICONVULSANT EFFECT OF KETAMINE 1003 after recording its body weight and was randomized elicited complete tonic hindlimb extension (THE) in to receive the treatments according to a random num­ control mice. For recording various parameters, mice ber table. They had identification marks identifying were placed in a clear rectangular plastic cage with an the dose level group and individual number. All of the open top, permitting full view of the animals' motor experimental protocols were approved by the institu­ responses to seizure. In the pilot study, various phases tional review committee and experiments were con­ of convulsions, viz. tonic flexion, extension, clonus, ducted in accordance with the guidelines for the care stupor and mortality due to convulsions were timed. and use of laboratory animals as adopted by the Na­ To evaluate the drug effect on the seizure severity, the tional Institutes of Health (NIH). All the experiments duration of THE and mortality due to convulsions. were performed between 1000 and 1800 hrs. were selected as the parameters. Each animal was in­ Drugs-Ketamine hydrochloride (Sigma, USA), dividually observed for 2hr after MES seizures, and, naloxone hydrochloride (Sigma, USA), haloperidol at 24hr for mortality. A compound is known to pos­ (Sigma, USA), sulpiride (Sigma, USA), sess anticonvulsant property if it reduces or abolishes (Ranbaxy, Delhi, India), y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) the extensor phase of MES. (BDH, Poole, Dorset, UK), muscimol (Sigma, USA), Treatment schedule of ketamine, naloxone, halo­ baclofen (Ciba-Geigy, Switzerland), flumazenil peridol and sulpiride in MES test-Data were ob­ (F. Hoffmann La Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 8-amino tained on dose-response relationship of ketamine on valerie acid (DAVA) (Sigma, USA) and (+)-5- MES seizures. To this end, different groups of mice methyl-1 0, 11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d] cyclohepten- received a single ip injection of the compound (5 - 5,10-imine (dizocilpine) (Merck Sharp and Dohme, 50mg/kg) and after 30 min, animals were subjected to West Point, PA) were used. The drugs were used as MES seizure and duration of THE phase and mortal­ their respective salts. Doses of the drug are reported ity due to convulsions were recorded. Effect on gen­ as the actual amount of drug administered after cor­ eral behaviour of mice was also recorded. For nalox­ 20 rection for the salt content. Ketamine hydrochloride, one studies , after pretreating the mice with 50mg/kg naloxone hydrochloride, GABA, muscimol, baclofen, of ketamine in separate groups, at 20 min, a dose of DAVA and dizocilpine (MK801) were dissolved in naloxone (0.1 and 1mg/kg) was administered; the distilled water. Haloperidol was dissolved in a few animals' were then subjected to MES seizure 10 min 21 drops of 0.1 N lactic acid and the volume was ad­ later. For the haloperidol and sulpiride studies , mice justed with distilled water. Sulpiride was dissolved in were pretreated sc with haloperidol (0.5-2mg/kg), a distilled water with a few drops of 0.1 N hydrochloric dopamine (D2) and sigma receptor antagonist or sul­ acid. Diazepam injection (Calmpose®) was diluted to piride (20mg/kg), a D2 selective antagonist in separate the required volume with distilled water before use. groups and at 30 min, a dose of ketamine (50mg/kg) Flumazenil was uniformly suspended in distilled wa­ was administered. The animals were then subjected to ter with a few drops of tween 80. Ketamine, naloxone MES seizure 30 min later. Haloperidol and sulpiride and DAVA were administered intraperitoneally (ip) were injected 1hr prior to MES as preliminary data 2 1 22 while haloperidol, sulpiride, diazepam, GABA, mus­ and literature reports ' indicated that this time pe­ cimol, baclofen, flumazenil and MK801 were injected riod was sufficient to allow for maximum or near­ subcutaneously (sc) in the scruff of the animals. In­ maximum drug effect. The per se effects of naloxone, jection volume (1 Omllkg) was kept constant. The se­ haloperidol and sulpiride were also studied. lection of doses, route of administration and time­ Drug -interaction studies schedule of different compounds was based on pilot Interaction between GABAA, and benzodiazepine experiments and pharmacokinetic considerations. Ap­ receptor ligands and ketamine-GABAA receptor propriate vehicle controls were employed in all ex­ , GABA (100 and 200 mg/kg, sc) and musci­ periments. For each series of experiments, separate mol (0.5 and 1mg/kg, sc) were studied alone and/or in controls were used in order to avoid variation in the combination with ketamine (5mg/kg, ip). These data from day to day. agents were administered 30 min prior to exposure to MES-induced convulsions-MES seizures 19 were MES. In combination study they were administered induced by an electroconvulsometer (Techno Instru­ concurrently. Benzodiazepine agonists, diazepam (2.5 ments, Lucknow). A 60mA current was delivered mg/kg sc, 30 min), and antagonist flumazenil (0.5 transauricularly for 0.2 sec in mice via small alligator mg/kg sc, 5 min) were administered alone and/or in clips attached to each pinna. This current intensity combination with ketamine. 1004 INDIAN J EXP BIOL, OCTOBER 2001

Interaction between GABA8 receptor ligands and tered with ketamine, these GABAergic drugs in their ketamine-GABA8 receptor , baclofen (2.5 respective doses significantly enhanced (?<0.001) the and 5 mg/kg, sc) and antagonist DAY A (50mg/kg, ip) protective effect of ketamine against MES seizures. were studied alone and/or in combination with keta­ Flumazenil (0.5 mg/kg) when given along with keta­ mine (5mg/kg, ip). These agents were administered mine, significantly (P < 0.001) attenuated the anti­ 25-30 min prior toMES. MES effect of the latter drug (Table 1). In animals Interaction between glutamatergic ligands and ke­ previously treated with diazepam (2.5 mg/kg) and tamine-The effect of NMDA receptor antagoni st ketamine, when treated with flumazenil, there was a MK 801 (0.1 mg/kg, sc) was studied alone and/or in reversal of faci litatory effect of diazepam on the pro­ combin ation with ketamine (5mg/kg, ip). Drugs were tective effect of ketamine. However, the mortality was administered 30 min prior to MES. In case of combi­ not significantly altered in all the above groups (Table 1). nation study they were administered concurrently. Interaction between GABA 8 receptor ligands and Statistical analysis-The duration of THE phase ketamine-Baclofen (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) per se sig­ of MES convulsions expressed as the arithmetic mean nificantly (P<0.001) decreased the duration of THE ± SE was analysed by one-way analysis of variance phase. Although it also reduced the mortality inci­ 23 24 (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's 't' test • . A dences (2/10,0/10) when compared to vehicle-treated grouped Chi-square test was initially used to deter­ control (4/1 0), the effect was not statistically signifi­ mine the overall differences in the mortality due to cant. DA VA, a GABA8 receptor blocker (50 mg/kg) convulsions. If a sign ificant effect was found, indi­ did not produce any effect per se, but it significantly vidual differences were determined by using a single (P<0.001) reversed the anti-MES effect of baclofen Chi-square test. P<0.05 was taken as a statistically and increased the mortality incidence (1110) [Table 2]. significant difference. When baclofen (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) was administered with ketamine (5mg/kg), it enhanced (P < 0.001) the Results protective effect of ketamine (Table 2) while DA VA Effect of ketamine-The lower doses of ketamine (50 mg/kg) attenuated the anticonvulsant effect of (5-lOmg/kg) produced mild sedation without affecting ketamine (?<0.001). In animals pretreated with both their gait /cage activity when compared to vehicle baclofen (5 mg/kg) and ketamine, DA VA reversed the treated control animals. However, ketamine in higher facilitatory action of baclofen on the anti-MES effect doses (25-50 mg/kg) produced motor incoordination of ketamine. However, the mortality was not signifi­ as observed with staggered gait whenever the animals cantly altered in all these groups (Table 2). moved. Interaction between glutamatergic ligands and ke­ MES induced tonic convul sions in all the animals. tamine-MK 801 (0.1 mg/kg) per se offered a signifi­ The end-point i.e. THE in vehicle treated control was cant protection (P was not significantly affected as compared to control =:2: '0~c . (Fig. 1). :c ~ 8 .... 1/) 0 Interaction betwee!l GABAA receptor ligands a!ld c Q) 0 :{l 4 ketamine- GABA (100 and 200 mg/kg), muscimol :;:;..c: e a. (0.5 and I mg/kg) and diazepam (2.5 mg/kg) per se :J 0 offered protection against MES in a dose-dependent Control KT(5) KT(10) KT(25) KT(50) fas hion. There was a significant reduction (P < 0.001) Drug treatment (mg/kg) in duration of THE. The mortality rate (3110) was re­ duced. Although, the difference was not stati stically Fig. ! -Effect of ketamine (KT) on maximal electroshock significant. Flumazenil pretreatment reversed the (MES)-induced convul sions in mice. [KT (mg/kg, ip ) treated protective effects of diazepam (Table 1). group s: 5; 10; 25; 50; "P

Table 1-Effect of benzodiazepine-GABAA receptor acting drugs per se and on the anticonvulsant activity of ketamine (KT) in max imal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice

Group Treatment Duration of hindlimb extensor phase( sec) Mortality## (mg/kg,ip or sc) (Mean± SE) #

I. Vehicle 16.00 ± 0.2 1 3/10 2. DZP (2.5)* 3.60 ± 0.43** 0110 3. FLM (0.5)* 15.80 ± 0.25 3/10 4. DZP (2.5)* + FLM (0.5)* 12.40 ± 0.31 ** 1110 5. GABA (100)* 12.50 ± 0.27** 0/10 6. GABA (200)* 8.10±0.18** 0/10 7. MUS (0.5)* 10.90 ± 0.31 ** OliO 8. MUS (1)* 5.00 ± 0.21 ** 0/10 9. KT (5) 10.90 ± 0.55** 2/10 10. KT(5) + DZP (2.5)* 2.60 ± 0.60 ** OliO 11. KT(5) + FLM (0.5)* 15.70 ± 0.15* * 3/10 12. KT(5) + DZP (2.5)*+FLM (0.5)* 10.30 ± 0.75** 1110 13. KT(5) + GABA (100)* 7.80 ± 0.30 ** 0/10 14. KT(5) + GABA (200)* 6.70 ± 0.26 ** OliO 15. KT(5) +MUS (0.5)* OliO 4.50 ± 0.17** 16 KT(5) +MUS (I)* OliO 2.30 ± 0.33** 2 F (15,144) = 167.094 X 1sd r = 6.03 (?<0.01)

*Drugs administered by sc route. **?<0.001 as compared with control( vehicle) or per se effect of ketamine or diazepam or its combination. Group 2,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,16 1; Group 4 vs 2; Group 10,11,13,14,15,16 vs 9; Group 12 vs 10; n=10. #One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's 't' test;## Grouped Chi-square test with Yates correction. DZP, diazepam; FLM, flumazenil; GABA, y-aminobutyric acid; MUS, muscimol.

Table 2 -Effect of GABA8 ergic drugs and NMDA receptor antagonist, MK80 I per se and on the anticonvulsant activity of ketamine (KT) in maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice

Group Treatment Duration of hindlimb extensor phase( sec) Mortality## (mg!kg,ip or sc) (Mean± SE) # 1. Vehicle 16.10 ± 0.75 4/10 2. BAC (2.5)* 10.00 ± 0.33** 2/10 3. BAC(5)* 5.10 ± 0.28** OliO 4. DAVA (50) 15.30 ± 0.37 3/10 5. BAC (5)* + DA VA (50) 14.30 ± 0.15** l/10 6. MK80 1 (0.1 )* 2.00 ± 0.56** 0/10 7. KT (5) 11.20 ± 0.42** 2/10 8. KT(5) + BAC (2.5)* 6.50 ± 0.43** 0/10 9. KT(5) + BAC (5)* 3.30 ± 0. 15** 0/10 10. KT(5) + DA VA (50) 16.40 ± 0.22** 3/10 11. KT(5) + BAC (5)* + DA VA (50) 11.80 ± 0.90 ** 1/10 12. KT(5) + MK801 (0.1)* 1.90 ± 0.46** 0/10 2 F(11,108) = 137.29 X 11ctr = 9.54 (?<0.01)

*Drugs administered by sc route. ** P < 0.001 as compared with control (vehicle) or per se effect of ketamine or baclofen or its combination. Group 2,3,4,6,7, 8, 9, 12 vs 1; Group 5 vs 3; Group 8,9,10,12 vs 7; Group 11 vs 9; n=IO. # One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's 't' test; ## Grouped Chi-square test with Yates correction. BAC, baclofen; DA VA, &-amino valerie acid. 1006 INDIAN J EXP BIOL, OCTOBER 2001

Table 3- Effect of naloxone (NLX), haloperidol (HP) and sulpiride (SP) per se and on the anticonvulsant activity of ketamine (KT) in maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice Group Treatment Duration of hindlimb extensor phase (sec) Mortality## (mg/kg, ip or sc) (Mean± SE) #

1. Vehicle 15.60 ± 0.62 4110 2. NLX (0.1) 15.20 ± 3.36 3/10 3. NLX (I) 16.00 ± 1.14 4/10 4. HP (0.5)* 15.50 ± 2.39 1/10 5. HP (I)* 16.10 ± 2.26 2110 6. HP (2)* 2/10 16.90± 1.81 7. SP (20)* 1/10 14.90 ± 1.25 8. KT(50) 0/10 0.90 ± 0.38** 9. KT(50)+NLX(O.I) 0/10 0.50 ± 0.40 10. KT(50)+NLX( I) 0/10 11. KT(50)+HP(0.5)* 1.30 ± 0.73 0110 12. KT(50)+HP(I)* 3.90 ± 0.53 0/10 13. KT(50)+HP(2)* 6.30 ± 0.30* 1/10 14. KT(50)+SP(20)* 9.30 ± 0.70** 0/10 0.20 ± 0.13 F(l3,126) = 22.22 X213dr= 13.52 (P < 0.01) *Drugs administered by s.c. route. *P<0.05; ** P<0.001 as compared with control (vehicle) or per se effect of ketamine. Group 2,3,4,5, 6, 7, 8 vs l; Group 9,10, 11,12,13,14 vs 8; n=IO. #One-way AN OVA followed by Dunnett's ' t' test; ##Grouped Chi-square test with Yates correction.

vulsions as compared to vehicle-treated control (Table suggest that GABAergic system may be involved in 2). When MK 801 ( O.lmg/kg ) was combined with the action of ketamine; since PTZ interferes with ketamine (5 mg/kg) in separate groups of mice, the GABA transmission and interacts with picrotoxinin protective effect of ketamine on MES seizures was binding site of GABA-benzodiazepine receptor com­ potentiated by MK 801, i.e. duration of THE was sig- plex and inhibits e5S]-t-butylbicyclophosphoro­ • nificantly reduced (?<0.001) and there was no mor­ 5 34 35 thionate (e S]-TBPS) binding ' . In the present tality as compared to mortality incidence (2110) in the study, the facilitation of protective effect of ketamine ketamine (Smg/kg) treated group (Table 2). on MES seizures by GABAergic agents, like diaze­ Interaction of ketamine with and dopa­ 36 37 pam, GABA and muscimol suggests that GABAA­ mine/sigma receptor ligands-Naloxone (0.1 mg/kg BZO mechanisms may be participating in atleast and 1 mg/kg) failed to reverse the protective effect of some ofketamine's anti-MES effect. Additionally, the ketamine against MES-induced convulsions. While reversal of facilitatory effect of diazepam on ketamine haloperidol (0.5-2mg/kg) a 0 dopamine and so called 2 protection of MES convulsions by flumazenil, a short­ sigma receptor antagonist reversed the effects of ke­ acting pure antagonist of the benzocliazepine recogni­ tamine, sulpiride (20 mg/kg) a selective 0 2 receptor 38 antagonist failed to show any significant reversal of tion site of GABAA receptor indicates that BZO site ketamine effect. None of these agents had any effect on BZO-GABAA receptor complex could be possibly per se against MES-convulsions (Table 3). involved in action of ketamine in the brain. This sug­ gestion gets further credence from observations, Discussion where flumazenil per se also attenuated the anti-MES GABA plays a critical role in the etiopathology of effect of ketamine when given alone. Further, the fa­ 5 epileps/ . GABAergic mechanisms have been impli­ cilitation of anticonvulsant action of ketamine by ba­ 9 cated in protection from a variety of chemo- and clofen, a GABA8 receptor agonise and attenuation of e I ectros h oc k -.In d uce d setzures. 26.?-8 . B enzo d'tazepme . anti-MES effect of ketamine alone as well as when (BZD) agonists, like diazepam are positive allosteric given in combination with baclofen by OA VA , a 40 modul ators qf GABA-mediated neurotransmission in GABA8 antagonist , show that besides GABAA, 28 30 CNS - . Ketamine has been found to be effective GABA8 receptors also in some way play a role in the against PTZ-induced convulsions2.4,J I-JJ_ These reports an ti-MES effect of ketamine. MANOCHA et al.: ANTICONVULSANT EFFECT OF KET AMINE 1007

There is also growing evidence that NMDA sub­ References type of excitatory (EAA) receptors play an I Anis N A, Berry S C, BUJ1on N R & Lodge D, The dissocia­ 41 tive anesthetics, ketamine and phencyclidine, selectively re­ important role in epilepsy • In fact, competitive and duce excitation of central mammali an neurons by N-methyl- non-competitive antagonists of NMDA receptor have 0-aspartate, Br 1 Pharmacal, 79 ( 1983) 565. shown potent anticonvulsant activity in a wide range 2 Taberner P V, The anticonvulsant activity of ketamine against 42 of seizure models . Ketamine is a well known non­ seizures induced by pentylenetetrazo l and mercaptopropionic competitive NMDA receptor antagonist and exerts its acid, Eur 1 Pharmacal, 39 (1976) 305. 3 Myslobodsky M S, Golovchinsky V & Mintz M, Ketamine: effects by entering and blocking the open c<~;tionic 36 Convulsant or anti-convul sant?, Pharmacal Biochem Behav, channel linked to NMDA receptors . MK801 is also 14 (198 1) 27. a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist which 4 Velfsek L, Mikolasova R, Blankova-Vankova S & Mares P, acts at a site within the ion channel of NMDA recep­ Effects of ketamine on metrazol-induced seizures during on­ 43 44 tor complex . Sharma et al. demonstrated the pro­ togenesis in rats, Pharmacal Biochem Behav, 32 ( 1989) 405. 5 Velfskova J, Velfsek L, Mares P & Rokyta R, Ketamine sup­ tective profile of MK801 and ketarnine in both rats presses both bicuculline- and picrotoxin-induced generalized and mice against NMDA-induced epileptogenic ex­ tonic-clonic seizures during ontogenesis, Pharmacal Biochem citotoxicity. In this study, MK801 potentiated the an­ Behav, 37 (1990) 667. ticonvulsant effect of ketamine on MES seizures 6 Sagratella S, Ni gli o T & Scotti de Carol is A, An in vesti gati on which indicates th at the anti-MES effect of ketamine on the mechani sm of anticonvulsant action of ketamine and phencyclidine on convulsions due to cortical applicati on of is also mediated at NMDA receptors. peni cillin in rabbits, Phannacol Res Commwz, 17 ( 1985) 773 . The observation that the protective effect of keta­ 7 Dal6 N L & Pifia-Crespo J C, Ketamine aboli shes the tonic mine on MES was reversed by haloperidol, a dopa­ phase of the seizures evoked by sudden cooling of toad iso­ 22 5 mine (D2) and sigma receptor antagonist .4 but not lated spin al cords, Neuropharmacology, 3 1 ( 1992) 509. 28 8 In oue M, Uriu T, Otani H, Hara M, Omori K & Inagaki C, by sulpiride, a selective D2 receptor antagonist indi­ Intracerebroventric ul ar injecti on of ethacrynic ac id induces cates the involvement of sigma but not D2 receptors in status epil epticus, Eu r 1 Pharmacal, 166 (1989) 10 l. the mediation of antiseizurogenic activity of keta­ 9 Fujikawa D G, Neuroprotective effect of ketamin e adminis­ mine. Further, the failure of naloxone to attenuate the tered after statu s epilepticus onset, Epilepsia, 36 (1995) 186. anticonvulsant action of ketamine rules out the in­ 10 DeVore G R, McQueen J K & Woodbury D M, Ketamine hy­ volvement of opioidergic system in this effect. drochloride and its effects on a chronic cobalt epileptic corti­ cal focus, Epilepsia, 17 (1973) I 11. Collectively, present findings suggest a role of I I Black J A, Go lden G T & Fariello R G, Ketamine activation GABAA-benzodiazepine coupled receptor system, of experimental co rticoreticul ar epi lepsy, Neu rology, 30 GABA8 receptors and sigma receptors besides (1980) 315. NMDA receptor channel in the anticonvulsant action 12 Bennett D R, Madsen J A, Jordan W S & Wiser W C, Keta­ of ketamine. The observation that ketamine acts on mine anesthesia in brai n damaged epi leptics : Elec trographic and clinical observations, Neu rology, 23 ( 1973)449. BZD binding sites on BZD-GABAA receptor complex 13 Wong E H F, Kemp J A, Priestl ey T, Kni ght A R, Woodruff (flumazenil antagoni sm) and on GABA8 receptors is G N & Iversen L L, The anticonvulsa nt M K- 80 1 is a potent an important finding. The results further hi ghli ght a N-meth yi-D-aspartate antagoni st, Proc Nat/ Acad Sci USA, 83 possible sigma receptor mediated link with NMDA ( 1986) 7104. 14 MacDonald J F, Mi lj kovic Z & Pennefather P, Use-dependent and GABAergic neurotransmitter systems in anti­ block of excitatory am ino acid currents in cultured neurons by MES action of ketamine. This suggestion gets support ketamine, 1 Neurophysiol, 58 (I 987) 25 1. from the previous study which documented that sigma 15 Vargiu L, Steffani E, Musinu C & Saba G, Poss ib le ro le of binding site is functionally associated wi th NMDA brain serotonin in th e central effects of ketamine, Neurophar­ receptor complex as agoni sts at this receptor interfere macology, II ( 1972) 305. 16 Gli sson S N, El-Etr A A & Bloor B C, The effec ts of keta­ in a non-competitive all osteric manner with NMDA­ 46 min e upon norepinephrine and dopamine levels in rabbit brain mediated cationic conductance . parts, Naunyn Schmiedeberg 's Arch Pharmacal, 295 (I 976) 149. Acknowledgement 17 LodgeD, Ani s N A & Bu rton N R, Effects of op ti ca l isomers The authors thank Prof.S.K.Kulkarni, Director, of ketamine on excitation of cal and rat spinal neurones by amino acids and acetylchol ine, New·osci Lell. 29( 1982) 281. CIIPP, Panjab Un iversity, Chandigarh for criticall y 18 Lodge D & Johnston G A R, Effect of ketami ne on amino reviewing the manuscript. This study was fin ancially acid-evoked release of acetylcholine from rat supported by CSIR, New Delhi. in vitro, Neurosci Lett, 56 ( 1985) 371. 1008 INDIAN J EXP BIOL, OCTOBER 200 I

19 Swinyard E A, Brown W C & Goodman L S, Comparative as­ razol and tetrazole analogues with the picrotoxin site of the says of antiepileptic drugs in mi ce and rats, 1 Pharmacal Exp benzodiazepine-GABA receptor-ionophore complex, Eur 1 Th er, 106 (1952) 3 19. Pharmacal, 98 (1984) 337. 35 20 Czuczwar S J & Frey H-H, Effect of and morphine­ 35 Maksay G & Ticku M K, The di ssociati on of [ S] t­ like analgesics on susceptibility to seizures in mice, Neuro­ butylbicyclophosphorothionate binding differentiates convul­ pharmacology, 25 (1986) 465. sant and drugs th at modulate GABAergic trans­ 21 Baudry M, Martres M-P & Schwartz J-C, In vivo binding of mi ssion, 1 Neurochem, 44 (1985) 480. 3 H-pimozide in mouse striatum: Effects of dopamine agonists 36 Rogawski M A & Porter R J, Antiepileptic drugs: Pharmacol­ and antagoni sts, L1je Sci, 21 ( 1977) 1163. ogical mechani sms and clinical efficacy wi th consideration of 22 Walker J M, Bowen W D, Walker F 0, Matsumoto R R, De­ promising developmental stage compounds, Pharmacal Rev, Costa B & Ri ce K C, Sigma receptors: Biology and function, 42 ( 1990) 223. Pharmacal Rev, 42 (1990) 355. 37 Sieghart W, Multiplicity of GABAA-benzodiazepine recep­ 23 Dunnett C W, A multiple comparison procedure for compar­ tors, Trends Pharmacal Sci, 10 (1989) 407. ing several treatments with a control, 1 Am statist Ass, 50 38 Brogden R N & Goa K L, Flumazenil: A reappraisal of its (1955) 1096. pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy as a ben­ 24 Statistical methods, edited by S P Gupta (Sultan Chand Pub­ zodiazepine antagoni st, Drugs, 42 (1991) I 06 1. li shers, India) 1990. 39 Bowery N, GABA8 receptors and their sign ificance in mam­ 25 Meldrum B S, Epi lepsy and y-aminobutyric acid-mediated in­ malian pharmacology, Trends Pharmacal Sci, 10 (1989) 401. hibition, lnt Rev Ne urobiol, 17 (1 975) I. 40 Robinson TN, Cross A J, Green A R, Toczek J M & Boar B 26 Bowdler J M & Green A R, Regional rat brain benzodiazepine R, Effects of the putative antagonists and 8- receptor number and y-aminobutyric acid concentration fol­ aminovaleric acid on GABA8 receptor bi ochemistry, lowing a convul sion, Br 1 Pharmacal, 76 ( 1982) 291. Br 1 Pharmacal, 98 (1989) 833. 27 Wielosz M, Stelm asiak M, Ossowska G & Kleinrok Z, Effects 41 Monaghan D T, Bridges R J & Cotman C W, The excitatory of electroconvulsive shock on central GABAergic mecha­ amino acid receptors: Their classes, pharmacology, and di s­ ni sms, Pol 1 Pharmacal Pharm, 37 ( 1985) 113. tinct properti es in the function of the central nervous system , 28 Principles of Neuropsychopharmacology, edited by R S Ann Rev Phannacol Toxicol, 29 ( 1989) 365. Feldman, J S Meyer & L F Quenzer (Massachusetts, Sinauer) 42 Croucher M J, Collins J F & Meldrum B S, Anticonvulsant 1997. action of excitatory amino acid antagoni sts, Science, 2 16 29 Costa E & Guidotti A, on tri al: A research (1982) 899. strategy for thei r rehabilitation, Trends Pharmacal Sci, 17 43 Kemp J A, Marshall G R & Priestley T, A compari son of th e ( 1996) 192. agoni st-dependency of the bl ock produced by uncompetitive 30 Neuroscience, edited by D Purves, G J Augustine, D Fitz­ NMDA receptor antagonists on rat cortical sli ces, Malec patrick, L C Katz, A-S LaMantia & J 0 McNamara (Massa­ Pharmacal, I ( 1991) 65. chu setts, Sinauer) 1997. 44 Sharma A C, Thorat S N, Nayar U & Kulkarni S K, Dizocil­ 3 1 Hayes B A & Balster R L, Anticonvulsant effects of phency­ pine, ketamine and ethanol reverse NMDA-induced EEG clidine-like drugs in mice, Proc Fed Am Soc Exp Bioi, 44 changes and convulsions in rats and mice, Indian 1 Physiol (1985a) 724. Pharmacal, 35 (1991) lll. 32 Hayes B A & Balster R L, Anticonvulsant properties of phen­ 45 Matsuno K, Kobayashi T, Tanaka M K & Mita S, a 1 Receptor cyclidine-like drugs in mice, Eur 1 Phannacol, 117 (1985b) subtype is in volved in the relief of behavioural despair in the 121. mouse forced swimming test, Eur 1 Pharmacal, 3 12 ( 1996) 33 Velfsek L, Vondrickova R, Mares P, Models of simple partial 267. and absence seizures in freely moving rats: Action of keta­ 46 Kulkarni S K & Verma A, Glutamate-dopamine receptor in­ mine, Pharmacal Biochem Behav, 45 (1993) 889. teraction in neuropsychiatric di sorders, Drugs Today, 27 34 Ramanjaneyulu R & Ticku M K, Interaction of pentylenetet (1991) 255.