DOCSLIB.ORG

New York City Arterial Goods Movement Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New York City Arterial Goods Movement Study New York City Arterial Goods Movement Study Rennselaer Polytechnic Institute, Polytechnic University, and Cornell University Region II University Transportation Research Center and Region 11 New York State Department of Transportation March 5, 2003 New York City Freight Arterials Study What Impact Will Future Freight Transportation Needs Have on the New York City Interstates and Truck Routes FINAL REPORT prepared for the Region II University Transportation Research Center and Region 11, New York State Department of Transportation George List, Donald Geoffroy, Jeffrey Wojtowicz, Laura Koniezny and Chanda Durnford Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute John Falcocchio, Jose Ulerio, and Ali Afshar Polytechnic University Arnim Meyburg Cornell University March 5, 2003 Acknowledgement The authors would like to acknowledge the help received from many people in the course of this research project. First and foremost is Peter King from Region 11, NYSDOT, who has contributed guidance and counsel that have been absolutely essential in understanding the purpose, scope, and context of the study, and ensuring that its focus, analysis, and findings can be most meaningful to the broadest possible audience. Supporting Peter have been Richard Hansen and Victor Teglasi, also from Region 11. Also critical have been Howard Mann and Kuo-Ann Chow from NYMTC and Alice Cheng of the New York City Economic Development Corporation, who have helped us with supporting information and guidance in the context of the Regional Freight Study, the modeling of the urban network, and the Cross Harbor Major Investment Study. Last, but certainly not least, we have to thank the people at Rensselaer who were invaluable in bringing the final report to closure, Marcia Hartnett and Jessica Josselyn. Table of Contents New York City Arterial Goods Movement Study What Impact Will Future Freight Transportation Needs Have on the NYC Interstate and Truck Route System? Executive Summary Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 Setting the Context ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 The Highway Network ................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 EZ Pass............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Parkways......................................................................................... 2-2 2.2 Rail, Water and Air Networks ....................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Rail Network................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 Water Network................................................................................ 2-2 2.2.3 Air Network .................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Freight Flow Patterns...................................................................... 2-3 2.3.1 How Freight is Carried.................................................................... 2-4 2.3.2 More about Truck Trips.................................................................. 2-4 2.4 Use of the Highway Network ......................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 Overall Perspective ......................................................................... 2-5 2.4.2 Heavily Used Segments .................................................................. 2-5 2.4.3 Truck Volumes................................................................................ 2-6 2.5 Summary......................................................................................... 2-7 Chapter 3 Evidence of Needs & Existing Problems ....................................... 3-1 3.1 Evidence from Agency Data .......................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Delays ............................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.2 Congestion ...................................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Pavement Conditions ...................................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Physical Restrictions....................................................................... 3-4 3.1.5 Connectivity.................................................................................... 3-5 3.1.6 Access to Freight Complexes.......................................................... 3-5 3.2 Evidence from Prior Studies ........................................................... 3-6 3.3 Stakeholder Inputs .......................................................................... 3-8 3.3.1 1996 NYMTC Survey..................................................................... 3-9 3.3.2 JFK Stakeholders .......................................................................... 3-10 3.3.3 Hunts Point Economic Development Corporation ....................... 3-10 3.3.4 United Parcel Service.................................................................... 3-11 3.4 Truck Needs Versus the TIP (Transportation Improvement Program)........................................ 3-12 3.5 Summary....................................................................................... 3-13 Table of Contents i Chapter 4 Methodology .................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Model Description ......................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Existing Conditions ........................................................................ 4-2 4.3 Model Validation ............................................................................ 4-3 4.4 Conclusions..................................................................................... 4-5 Chapter 5 Year 2025 ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Future Scenarios ............................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Year 2025 Traffic Projections ........................................................ 5-2 5.3 Findings........................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.1 Scenario S1 ..................................................................................... 5-4 5.3.2 Scenario S2 ..................................................................................... 5-5 5.3.3 Scenario S3 ..................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.4 Scenario S4 ..................................................................................... 5-9 5.3.5 Scenario S5 ................................................................................... 5-10 5.4 Overarching Trends ...................................................................... 5-11 5.5 Concluding Remarks..................................................................... 5-12 Chapter 6 Non-Capital Enhancement Options ............................................... 6-1 6.1 Geometric Restrictions on Truck Use ............................................ 6-1 6.1.1 Current New York City Regulations .............................................. 6-2 6.1.2 Vertical Clearances ......................................................................... 6-3 6.1.3 Other Jurisdictions .......................................................................... 6-3 6.1.3.1 New York State Department of Transportation.............................. 6-3 6.1.3.2 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority....................................... 6-4 6.1.3.3 Port Authority of New York and New Jersey................................. 6-5 6.1.4 Impact of the Restricted Truck Network ........................................ 6-6 6.1.5 Conclusions and Recommendations about Truck Dimensions....... 6-7 6.2 Commercial Vehicles on Parkways ................................................ 6-8 6.2.1 Possible Mitigating Solutions ......................................................... 6-8 6.2.2 Findings and Recommendations Regarding Trucks on Parkways.6-10 Chapter 7 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................. 7-1 7.1 Stakeholder Input............................................................................ 7-1 7.2 Previous Studies ............................................................................. 7-2 7.3 Present and Future Conditions........................................................ 7-3 7.4 Non-Capital Measures .................................................................... 7-5 7.5 Recommendations........................................................................... 7-6 Appendix A Support for Chapter 2 Figures..................................................... A-1 Appendix B Support for Figure 3-8...................................................................B-1 Appendix C Prior Studies..................................................................................C-1 Table of Contents ii Appendix D NYMTC Survey Results.............................................................. D-1 Appendix E Mathematical Description of the Model........................................E-1 Appendix F Network Model Data.....................................................................F-1 Appendix G Cost of Adding Capacity to the System....................................... G-1 Appendix H Additional Maps for Year 2000 and Year 2025 Model Runs...... H-1 Table of Contents iii Tables and Figures Chapter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NYMTC Regional Freight Plan
    3-1 CHAPTER 3: THE THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Photo Source: NYMTC Photo Source: 5. Implementation Guidance 3. Identifying & Assessing Needs 4. Improvements & Solutions 1. Regional Freight Plan Purpose & Desired Freight Outcomes 2. Freight System & Market Overview Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Appendix 8 | Regional Freight Plan 2018-2045 Table of Contents 1.0 Regional Freight Plan Purpose and Desired Freight Outcomes ................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan 2045 Shared Goals and Desired Freight Outcomes ......................................................... 1-2 1.2 Institutional Context ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Regional Context ....................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Required Federal Performance Measures................................................................................. 1-4 2.0 Freight System and Market Overview .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Freight System Description and Operating Characteristics ....................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Roadway Network ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Rail Network .................................................................................................................. 2-8 2.1.3 Waterborne Network
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals for the Performance Of
    February 20, 2018 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF EXPERT PROFESSIONAL PLANNING AND FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE WHARF REPLACEMENT PROGRAM DURING 2018 THROUGH 2020 (RFP #52133) Dear Sir or Madam: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the “Authority”) is seeking proposals in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP) from prospective consultants (also “you,” “Firm” and “Proposer”) for the performance of expert planning and feasibility study for the wharf replacement program. The scope of the planning and feasibility study is to provide the Authority with a framework from which to plan the systematic replacement of its waterfront structures over a span of approximately thirty (30) years for its five (5) port facilities: Port Newark, Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal, Port Jersey-Port Authority Marine Terminal, Howland Hook Marine Terminal and Brooklyn-Port Authority Marine Terminal (“Wharf Replacement Program”). The term of the agreement between the Authority and the Consultant will be for two (2) years, with up to two (2) additional one (1) year option periods, upon the same terms, conditions and pricing, unless otherwise agreed to by the Authority. The scope of the services to be performed by you are set forth in Attachment A of the Authority’s Standard Agreement (the “Agreement”), included herewith as Exhibit II. You should carefully review this Agreement as it is the form of agreement that the Authority intends that you sign in the event of acceptance of your Proposal and forms the basis for the submission of Proposals. The services to be performed by the Consultant may be funded in whole or in part by the Federal Highway Administration, therefore Federally mandated terms and conditions are applicable (See Exhibit I for applicable Federal Highway Administration Requirements).
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty-Second Annual Report
    1933 FIFTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD • COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31st DECEMBER, 1933 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, BROAD STREET STATION BUILDING, PHILADELPHIA, PA. Downloaded from http://PRR.Railfan.net - Collection of Rob Schoenberg - ©2019 - Commercial reproduction or distribution prohibited THE LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY DIRECTORS W. W. ATTERBURY............................. Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. HERBERT C. LAKIN............................ 14 Wall Street, New York, N. Y. A. J. COUNTY................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. W. E. FREW... , ................................. 13 William Street, New York, N. Y. HERBERT L. PRATT.... · ........................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. H. R. WINTHROP................................ 26 Broadway, New York, N. Y. G. LEBOUTILLIER. .............................. Pennsylvania Station, New York, N. Y. ALFRED H. SWAYNE............................ 1775 Broadway, New York, N. Y. JOHN A. HARTFORD........................... .420 Lexington Avenue, New York, N. Y. T. W. HULME ................................... Broad Street Station Building, Philadelphia, Pa. M. W. CLEMENT................................ Broad Street Station Building; Philadelphia, Pa. DAVID L. LUKE ................................ 230 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. CARLETON H. PALMER ........................ 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, N. Y. FLOYD L. CARLISLE ............................ 15 Broad Street, New York, N. Y. J. L. EYSMANS ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Mobility
    Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION THE EAST OF HUDSON RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONS TASK FORCE Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION Environmental Defense and the East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force On the cover Left:Trucks exacerbate crippling congestion on the Cross-Bronx Expressway (photo by Adam Gitlin). Top right: A CSX Q116-23 intermodal train hauls double-stack containers in western New York. (photo by J. Henry Priebe Jr.). Bottom right: A New York Cross Harbor Railroad “piggypacker” transfers a low-profile container from rail to a trailer (photo by Adam Gitlin). Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. The East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force is committed to the restoration of price- and service-competitive freight rail service in the areas of the New York metropolitan region east of the Hudson River. The Task Force seeks to accomplish this objective through bringing together elected officials, carriers and public agencies at regularly scheduled meetings where any issue that hinders or can assist in the restoration of competitive rail service is discussed openly. It is expected that all participants will work toward the common goal of restoring competitive rail freight service East of the Hudson. ©2004 Environmental Defense Printed on 100% (50% post-consumer) recycled paper, 100% chlorine free.
    [Show full text]
  • LIRR Pages PRR Record of Transportation Lines
    NEW YORK ZONE - ASSOCIATED UNES THE LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD COMPANY ALL SITUATE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK LENGTH OF TRACKS. MILES Oeeember 31. 1940 IncreMe and Decrease during 1940 Valuation NAME OF UNE. 0" Section -; [~ ]! Jj l~ ~ ,eoE:! l~ U U THE LONG ISLAND RAI L ROAD CO. - LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD COl1PANY,THE •• 2-N Y Long Island Clty,N.Y.,91 feet east of centre of • • passenger statlon,to Greenport,N.Y.,418 feet east of - Lo:ni~~~~ g~~~:n~~~, ~~!;~~~~. T;~~~: t~ 'whit~p;t:N: y:;" 94.43 31.53 13.42 13.18 60.07 212.63 0.13 0.13 2-N.Y. jilllctlon with Glendale Cut-off, 42 feet east of centre 4.37 4.13 0.33 8.83 - NOR~~ ~~~o~~~g~;e~cH~i:i:R:R:"""""""" ..... 2a.-N.Y. Long Island Clty,N.Y.,Float BrlC1ges J foot of 5th Street, to 460 feet east. of east line of Harold Avenue ••••...• 2.13 2.24 27.87 32.24 - I10NTAUK CUT-OFF,L.I.R,R. Long Island C1tY,N.Y.,junction with North Shore la-N.Y. Freight Branch,4 feet west of centre line- of Dutch- kills Street, to junction with Montauk Branch,154 feet west of centre line of Greenpoint Avenue •.•.•. 1.11 1.03............ 0.80 2.94 ...................... - Long Island 9ity,west line of Pierson Place,701 feet 9-N.Y. from point of switch connection with Montauk Cut- gIdi~~a~o~n~s o£e~~~o~e:I~:I) 7~~:. ~::~~. ::::: ...... 2.33 2.33 .....
    [Show full text]
  • Rockaway Beach Branch Sketch Assessment Final White Paper Lirr Contract 6168C-10-09, Release “A”
    Credit: Newsday / John Paraskevas)II PHASE ONE: ROCKAWAY BEACH BRANCH SKETCH ASSESSMENT FINAL WHITE PAPER LIRR CONTRACT 6168C-10-09, RELEASE “A” Submitted by: In Association With: 520 Eighth Avenue, Suite 2100 New York, NY 10018 September 21, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ROCKAWAY BEACH BRANCH ............................................................................................. 1 2. DEFINITION OF OPERATIONAL ALIGNMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Woodside to White Pot Junction (Grade Section – Station 100+00 to 182+00) ....................................4 2.1.2 White Pot Junction (Cut and Embankment – Station 182+00 to 210+00) .............................................5 2.1.3 White Pot Junction to Atlantic Avenue (Cut,
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Freight Transportation Plan Background Analysis (Deliverable 1)
    NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) JUNE 2015 PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NEW YORK STATE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION PLAN BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (DELIVERABLE 1) PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 COMMON GOALS AND THEMES................................................................................................... 2 2.1 | Goals Identification ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 | Theme Identification ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 | Gap Identification......................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Geographic Coverage......................................................................................................................................... 10 Gaps in Modal Coverage ................................................................................................................................................. 11 Gaps in Coordination ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • David Keller Photographs
    1) Keller, David, c.1952- . Long Island Photograph Collection, c.1880-1971. Special Collections Department/Long Island Studies Institute Contact Information: Special Collections Department Axinn Library, Room 032 123 Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11549 Phone: (516) 463-6411, or 463-6404 Fax: (516) 463-6442 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.hofstra.edu/Libraries/SpecialCollections Compiled by: [M. O’Connor] Date [August 29, 2014] Completed: Keller, David, c.1952- . Long Island Photograph Collection, c.1880-1971. 0.6 cubic ft. Biographical Note: At age 14, self-described “railfan” David Keller, then a resident of Holtsville, purchased a Yashica twin-lens reflex camera, which he taught himself to use. He then set out on a mission to photograph Long Island Rail Road (L.I.R.R.) structures exclusively; however, his subject matter quickly expanded to include things such as trains and train crews. Keller’s father supported the young teen’s ambition, and he drove him all over Long Island to photograph the various L.I.R.R. stations. Keller later became a fixture at the “PD” tower in Patchogue, where he learned all about the history and operation of the railroad. During college, he worked for the L.I.R.R for three summers, first as a ticket clerk and later as a special services attendant. Keller and fellow avid railfan and writer Steven Lynch have published two books of L.I.R.R. photographs: The Long Island Rail Road 1925-1975 (Images of Rail) (2004) and Revisiting the Long Island Rail Road: 1925-75 (2005). In addition, Keller maintains a website titled Dave Keller’s RR Photo Archives (http://sbiii.com/d-keller/d-keller.html).
    [Show full text]
  • QIAA Newsletter
    ______________________________ ______________________________ Q I A A NEWS 24-HOUR HOTLINE: ALL MAIL TO: ON THE INTERNET: 7 1 8 - 5 2 0 - 5 0 2 1 P.O. Box 754088 www.queensaa.org OFFICE ADDRESS: PARKSIDE STATION EMAIL: [email protected] 105-29B METROPOLITAN AVENUE FOREST HILLS NEW YORK EMAIL: [email protected] OFFICE TELEPHONE: 718-520-5024 11375-9088 JANUARY-FEBRUARY-MARCH 2009 UPDATES TO THE APRIL 2008 QUEENS AREA MEETING BOOK NEVER SEND A NEWCOMER TO A MEETING THAT HAS CLOSED OR TO A GROUP THAT HAS SUSPENDED ITS MEETINGS. th (compiled as of January 20 2009: Please copy and insert this information into any meeting books distributed at your group.) Pg. 9 - Astoria. CRESCENT no longer meets on Thursday. But, Tuesday's Open Meeting at 8:00 P.M. is still open to all, including the general Public. - ASTORIA FRESH START has been discontinued. - ASTORIA SAFE & SOBER has added the former FRESH START Meeting on Monday (Closed at 12 Noon) to the others at the Episcopal Church location, 30-14 Crescent Street. Pg. 11 - BAYSIDE PRIMARY PURPOSE has discontinued the Friday 9:30 P.M. Meeting. Pg. 12 - College Point. FROM THE ASHES has a new time for the Sunday Closed Meeting - 6:00 P.M. instead of 6:30, and there is no longer a Big Book Meeting on Wednesday. The Sunday Beginners and Wednesday Closed schedules remain unchanged. Pg. 13 - Flushing. AUBURNDALE GROUP has consolidated their 2 Meetings on the last Wednesday of the month only into one Open Meeting at 7:30 P.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    to approximately 1838 in the mid-Atlantic States Introduction prior to the American Civil War.” History of the Transfer Bridges: What Are They? Cross Harbor Freight Program (taken from the PA Greenville Yard Cross Harbor Freight Program-Basis Transfer Bridges are used to transfer automobiles, rail of Design Report December 20, 2012) cars or pedestrians from land based to water based transportation systems or vice versa. For example a Greenville Yard is the western terminus of the current ferry ramp that acts as a bridge between land and the rail car float (barge) system, which operates between ferry is an example of a transfer bridge. Transfer Jersey City and 65th Street Facility on the Brooklyn bridges can also be used to transfer rail cars onto and waterfront. The barge rail car float system that moves off of car floats. A car float is a barge that has rails goods across the New York Harbor has been in mounted on the deck so that rail cars can be pushed existence since before the growth of the national onto the barge for transport across a river or harbor. highway system and before the construction of vehicular bridges spanning the Hudson River. The Car floats rise and fall with the tide. Also the Cross Harbor rail freight operation at Greenville Yard freeboard on the car float changes as the loading on once encompassed six rail transfer bridges; as many the car float changes. The freeboard is the distance as thirty-nine rail car floats barges, and upland rail from the waterline to the top of deck.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017- 2026 Capital Project List — Renew Sorted by Department, Facility, and Program (In Thousands)
    2017- 2026 Capital Project List — Renew Sorted by Department, Facility, and Program (in thousands) 2017-2021 2022-2026 2017-2026 ProjeCt ID ProjeCt Title Stage Asset Category Spending Spending Spending TUNNELS, BRIDGES AND TERMINALS GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE REHABILITATION AND RECOATING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR FORT CB04-223 Planning Bridges $3,900 $1,500 $5,400 WASHINGTON AVE REHABILITATION AND RECOATING OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR CB04-224 Planning Bridges 4,200 1,500 5,700 AMSTERDAM AVENUE REPLACEMENT OF LIGHTING ALONG FIXTURES, FEEDERS AND Electrical Power & CB04-229 Planning 1,700 – 1,700 WIRING RAMPS Lighting Electrical Power & CB04-241 REHABILITATION OF NJ/NY HIGH TENSION ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR Planning 9,400 46,600 56,000 Lighting CB04-260 REPLACEMENT OF TOLL COLLECTION SYSTEM Construction Control Systems 55,000 – 55,000 CB04-263 REHABILITATION OF TRANS MANHATTAN EXPRESSWAY Planning Paving & Roadways 800 39,100 39,900 REHABILITATION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL, LEAD ABATEMENT & CB04-286 Planning Bridges 5,300 7,200 12,500 PAINT FOR NEW YORK RAMPS HVAC, Plumbing & CB04-310 REPLACEMENT OF CHILLER AT TOLL HOUSES Planning 4,900 3,000 7,900 Sprinklers CB04-312 UPGRADE/REPLACEMENT OF SIGNS AND FIELD DEVICES Design Control Systems 49,000 800 49,800 Electrical Power & CB04-325 REPLACEMENT OF EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEM Design 3,300 – 3,300 Lighting CB04-328 UPGRADE OF FLAG HOIST SYSTEM ACCESS Planning Bridges 1,500 – 1,500 CB04-330 REHABILITATION OF HUDSON RAMPS COMPLEX – PHASE II Planning Bridges – 3,400 3,400 REHABILITATION OF ROADWAY DECK OVER EMERGENCY
    [Show full text]
  • Railroads in New York State - 2013 NJT Campbell ! LEGEND ! ! ] ! NYSW Hall MNJ Berkshire [NS] Maybrook Beacon ! ! Jct
    CP to CSXT to Montreal [AMTK] ! Montreal CP St. Lambert, QUE CN [CSXT] ! Montreal, QUE N i a g a r a FRR [CSX] Mechanicville ST Huntingdon SOM ! Hoffmans Central Station ! [CP] [AMTK/NS] Mechanicville [CN] Lockport CSXT ! CP Rooseveltown ! East Alburg NIAGARA Lockport CP [CSX/NS/ST] CSXT ! ! Rouses Point Fort Covington NECR FALLS CSXT CSXT [AMTK/NS] RotterdamCSXT MSTR ! CSXT AMTK S a r a t o g a Rouses Point ! [CN] Massena CSXT Jct. ST Helena Mohawk Niagara Falls ST [AMTK] Yard Plattsburgh I T Yard X CP CSXT NorfolkNYOG S ! C [AMTK/NS] CANADA Port Kent North Tonawanda South [AMTK/NS] SCHENECTADY [CSX] CP ! ! CP C l i n t o n CSXT Schenectady Port of NYOG Norwood C l i n t o n ! !Plattsburgh Martinsville Carman Ogdensburg ! Westport CP [NS] CSXT Cohoes ! NECR North CSXT Port Henry Bluff Point CANADA Tonawanda ! Schenectady VT Yard CSXT AMTK Ticonderoga T F r a n k l i n X Toronto, ONT S [CP/CSXT] Castleton C Watervliet NECR Essex Jct. Tonawanda Oakville, ONT ! ! CSXT Whitehall Rutland Burlington E r i e St Lawrence [CSX] Aldershot, ONT Kenmore SNY CP TROY NECR Yard SNY West Albany CP BUFFALO Rome Fort Edward [CP] Grimsby, ONT Niagara Falls VTR Yard Rochester CSXT [CN/CP/NS] [AMTK] ! St. Catherines, ONT Buffalo Syracuse Utica to NECR Black Rock CSXT Niagara Falls, ONT Gouverneur! ! ADCX White River Jct. Depew Amsterdam Saratoga Springs CSXT [AMTK] ! CSXT Saranac International Lake Voorheesville ! CSXT [AMTK] Frontier Buffalo Lake Bridge CSXT [AMTK] ALBANY ! Placid Kenwood Schenectady Newton ! Yard DLWR ! Rensselaer Exchange St.
    [Show full text]